The races (sub-species) are biologically distinct and a study on ancient Africans

The races (sub-species) are biologically distinct, QED:
https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-comment2007

A debate has arisen regarding the validity of racial/ethnic categories for biomedical and genetic research. Some claim ‘no biological basis for race’ while others advocate a ‘race-neutral’ approach, using genetic clustering rather than self-identified ethnicity for human genetic categorization. We provide an epidemiologic perspective on the issue of human categorization in biomedical and genetic research that strongly supports the continued use of self-identified race and ethnicity.

Parroting a comment I made to Vox for SEO.

And just like white people have other ‘species’ DNA (Neanderthal), so too do Africans (non-Neanderthal).
https://phys.org/news/2011-09-modern-humans-interbred-archaic-hominin.html
I too, fucking love science.

“Instead, we looked at DNA from modern humans belonging to African populations and searched for unusual regions in the genome.”
And they were older than modern. Imagine my shock.
“What we do know is that the sequences of those forms, even the Neanderthals, are not that different from modern humans,” he said.
-BECAUSE THEY THE SAME SPECIES. Sorry, broke into spontaneous ebonics because of the topic.
“They have certain characteristics that make them different from modern DNA.”
No shit?

Could be better or worse depending on the variant. They refuse to clone Neanderthals because no company could own them (human rights are based on demonstration of human IQ) and they’d be the smartest human on the planet. It would show us all up. I want it to happen. Neanderthals were more civilized than us, we learnt funerary rites from them. Please clone the African ancestors too, see what happens.

“Then we asked ourselves what does the general pattern of variation look like in the DNA that we sequenced in those African populations, and we started to look at regions that looked unusual,” Hammer said. “We discovered three different genetic regions fit the criteria for being archaic DNA still present in the genomes of subSaharan Africans. Interestingly, this signature was strongest in populations from central Africa.”
I’ll fly high on this one and say no comment.

“We are talking about something that happened between 20,000 and 60,000 years ago – not that long ago in the scheme of things,” Hammer said. “If interbreeding occurs, it’s going to bring in a whole chromosome, and over time, recombination events will chop the chromosome down to smaller pieces. And those pieces will now be found as short, unusual fragments. By looking at how long they are we can get an estimate of how far back the interbreeding event happened.”
Outbreeding depression…. it isn’t inter-breeding, it’s out-breeding….
“We think there were probably thousands of interbreeding events,” Hammer said. “It happened relatively extensively and regularly.”

He can’t be saying, they were literally fucking monkeys? No. …No? No.
Are they technically humans they were screwing or not? At best, they mixed races. At worst, bestiality. I read a conspiracy that human anatomy is so weird because we’re the result of primates mating with hogs. That’s why pig hearts and such work on us. It was surprisingly detailed and I couldn’t think of anything to counter it.* I am also scared now.

I’m making the odd low/no effort post when I can be asked.

*Also explains the Biblical prohibition on pork.

Explaining Adultery, parts of the Bible, disease etc.

No one has typed out an explanation of this, to my knowledge. Sure there are linguistic essays but… still.

Here’s the logical explanation of certain things. Ending with collaborating science.

Adultery is a sin because it’s a pollution of bloodlines, that’s why it’s called that but the sexual action or compulsion is already covered under the coveting commandment. Fornication between two singles, while a sin, is not polluting the bloodlines of the marital couple. It doesn’t defile the marital bed, as the Bible puts it (Hebrews 13:4). It’s “and” adulterers, they’re discrete categories. The adultery involving one married party may produce a child with defects (especially with the effect of STDs from sleeping around, which they’d bring back to the marital bed, onto their own children – and might kill them), or the child maritally or the one “extra-maritally” may eventually marry their own part-sibling and then produce defect. All the sexual prohibitions are henceforth founded in an avoidance of bloodline corruption.

They’re not being ‘lame’ and killing your ‘buzz’ man, it’s babymaking. Don’t make broken babies!

The sterile view of reproduction is like a Marxist’s view of labour – delusional.

re Deut 23:2 and the mistranslation in later editions:
Legitimacy is based on bloodlines more than marital status but under the parent-approved marriage model the former suitability led to the latter ceremony. They’d have veto power on funding the wedding and allowance of inheriting anything should the child try to brattishly insist on an adulterous match. Banishment (disowning) is the parental right should the child “dishonour” (commandment) their parent’s standards. A bastard didn’t refer to unmarried parents back then but moreso what we’d call politely a hybrid, Darwin a mongrel. Later editions mistranslated the concept of ‘bastard’ for ((reasons)). Logically, unmarried parents could feasibly marry at any point in the next 18 years and 9 months, the insult cannot be based on something so easily remedied. Instead it’s “in the blood”, it’s about the “seed”, it’s genetic. It’s the existence of the kid itself which is the affront, the offense to the holy, and that’s why ‘bastard’ is levied at the child – not the parents! They brought shame on their pre-existing family (bloodline) by virtue of their dishonourable existence, of a blemish. The OT often condemns men who mate with ‘foreign women’, the archetype of demonic seductress. That’s why usually understanding God (who forgives individuals) forbade the child to enter the church, holy ground, sacred temples, unto the 10th generation, because it was a perversion of his creation and divine, famous plan for separation of peoples; its existence was Satanic, a testament to playing God. Its existence was an insult to God, directly, it was an ABOMINATION.
Now we have the medical stats to back this up from the individualist perspective, from mental problems to organ death from child cancer, nobody mentions it…?
Why? Why not? Who’s behind that cultural ignorance?
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Race-Mixing/
The sins of the father onto the child i.e. you produce an unnatural thing, it suffers unnaturally.

Period blood isn’t the only unclean thing: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Semen

So bad marital discernment (selection) relates to the reprobate mind. Selection is the ONE job of men looking for a wife. The Bible gives plenty of advice on men seeking a wife, what to look for.

Cast not ye pearls among swine, neither spill your seed, it’s very simple conceptually. Don’t waste a breeding opportunity with a bad match or selfishness. You want societal shame back? Start with masculine self-control (Lev 22:4) because you’ll be healthier for it. This isn’t just spiritually good but physically too. Like don’t stick your dick in crazy. At least a woman’s period isn’t alive for all the stigma, there’s nothing to kill. God designed women to self-clean the baby oven, there’s no shame in it. Poor analogy to the modern Onans. You have a specific story about sexual continence, sexual hygiene, call it whatever, it’s being a man.
https://www.openbible.info/topics/spilling_your_seed
https://biblereasons.com/evil-women-and-bad-wives/

If you marry badly, that doesn’t absolve you of responsibility for her sins. You’re the man, you’re responsible, be she some Polish whore (they’re mostly marrying Arabs and Japs) or an ABG/LBFM thot (mostly autists).

Prov 22:14  The mouth of an adulterous woman is a deep pit; a man who is under the LORD’s wrath falls into it.

I’m picturing the conceited weebs who start lecturing the rest of us (projection in ego defense of their error) on how white people in the West should become more Asian. You eat the bugs first, bug boy. Such cucking is, as you can see, Biblically predicted as God’s wrath upon the reprobate mind. Insecurity breeds insecurity, misery loves company, fuck-ups want you to copy them.

If everyone fails, the sexual Marxists reason, then nobody fails!

They want no holy (wholesome, pure) group to be able to compare poorly to.

deceit, malice, envy….

https://biblehub.com/romans/1-28.htm

why be envious of people you claim to be doing better than? Why talk about the West at all after you left? Why are you obsessing over it, if it’s inferior culturally? Racial deserters should STFU and stay in their jungle. We don’t want to hear from you, stay gone. There’s a rise in snarky gammas online giving weeb “commentary” that sounds like CCP propaganda. It’s anti-white, sod off. Why should we care what you think? You ran away from the problems, drop them. It’s like a Boomer who retired to France complaining about UK immigration. No Susan. You don’t get to.

Stats show up their forum anecdotes as fantasies. They wanted mixed bloodlines, right, they’ll be happy with the black grandkids I presume (since mixed dates other mixed, statistically).

In Deut 7:3 even the unequal yoking between the races is forbidden, before the prospect of children is mentioned.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%207&version=KJV
Cultures are intended to be sovereign. Interconnection is weakness.
7:4 says how mixed marriages are insults because of cultural cucking i.e. your child will adopt foreign ways.
Learn to tell your kids no, Boomer. JUST SAY NO.

Otherwise, unchecked, they “invent new forms of evil” like the conceited weebs that are becoming the new Fedora Boy.

insolent, arrogant, boastful….

It’s like the Gap Year story that never ends.

NEVER.

And we’re all expected to listen to it.

One word: why?

Do evil, fine, don’t be boastful though. I shouldn’t be socially expected to listen to some woman’s sob story about how she married a Muslim either. Tough tits, bitch. You knew they was a snake. You signed up for shit. It’s like the thots joining Islamic State, I no longer feel loyal to you either. I owe you nothing.

Stop coddling them. They’re grown men rationalizing objectively, scientifically shit marriages.

And encouraging the same multicultural evil to other men, that’s gender treason. You shouldn’t enable it.

There were 10 basic rules. Multicultural tradlarpers moved, so please stop talking to us like you’re a Westerner. You’re an outsider now, ree.

https://biblehub.com/romans/1-32.htm

Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things are worthy of death,they not only continue to do these things,but also approve of those who practice them.

Worthy of death, how would God manifest that in case of adulterous children?

Suicidal temperament, perhaps?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

Cancer risks?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25792752/

Our results confirm that there are ethnic and racial differences in the incidence of childhood leukaemia. These differences indicate that some genetic and/or environmental/cultural factors are involved in aetiology of childhood leukaemia.

American diet means you should compare to European whites for accuracy. Twinkies are thots, not food groups.

The highest risk of ALL was observed for children with a combination of Hispanic ethnicity and White race compared with non-Hispanic whites (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.44).

They actually leave out mixed of most studies e.g. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14559954/

unless they can rig the numbers from the small group because it’s so bad in outcome. It’s impossible to find prevalence data, why?

It’s true in other species scientifically, outbreeding depression is unholy, it defiles the wholesome in God’s eye. That invites wrath.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10762398/

https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article/96/2/114/2187513

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12144669/

Mixing stunts growth, even in plants. Sure, you might have kids but great-grandkids won’t happen.

So what was the point?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15487997/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14983018/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15807418/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9375532/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4066391/

Deny the lies of the spiteful mutants, anti-natalists aren’t so toxic to the zero sum of Darwinian competition. To actively encourage our genocide is evil.

Funny that the cuckservatives slagging off the Boomers want a free pass to act just like them despite decades of data now. That didn’t exist for them. You’re living in the experiment.
And yes, the Boomers should’ve been disowned by their parents for marrying wrong or too often.

They’ll deport, sorry “return” tortoises for their own good – but not humans.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19426071.300-galapagos-tortoises-untangling-the-evolutionary-threads.html

The spiteful mutants of the Boomer gen became worse in the spiteful mutants of Gen Y and Z – but nobody is condemning them.

Science and Bible agree, how much do you need?

I heard a theory the trash segment of Boomers should’ve been picked off by war like Vietnam and the draft dodging is the main cause of our dysgenics. Possible and funny.

So how to know the weeb boys abroad are lying?

Weeb offspring and mental problems:

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/uoc–baa081108.php

A new study of Chinese-Caucasian, Filipino-Caucasian, Japanese-Caucasian and Vietnamese-Caucasian individuals concludes that biracial Asian Americans are twice as likely as monoracial Asian Americans to be diagnosed with a psychological disorder.

A+ parenting.

Zane and his co-investigator, UC Davis psychology graduate student Lauren Berger, found that 34 percent of biracial individuals in a national survey had been diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as anxiety, depression or substance abuse, versus 17 percent of monoracial individuals. The higher rate held up even after the researchers controlled for differences between the groups in age, gender and life stress, among other factors.

1/3. Over a THIRD of them are literally mentally diseased at the intensity to diagnose.

The study included information from 125 biracial Asian Americans from across the U.S., including 55 Filipino-Caucasians, 33 Chinese-Caucasians, 23 Japanese-Caucasians and 14 Vietnamese-Caucasians.

Stop listening to spiteful mutants.

Nobody’s jealous, they’re clinically evil. Shun the reprobate mind.

High diversity, low trust society: https://web.archive.org/web/20061013041712/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c4ac4a74-570f-11db-9110-0000779e2340.html

deport the whores

nb. The edgy anti-natal rhetoric worked on the Boomers first, ask the dead half of Gen X. However, there’s more than one way to skin a cat and clearly more than one way to commit genetic suicide.

The womb is a very sophisticated form of printer. It prints people. That’s why women hate being conflated for one, it’s an appliance. Don’t defile the womb of your people, that’s treason. Do not corrupt the seed.

Plato’s natural slaves, do not follow. Degenerates are compulsive liars e.g.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3203037/

https://sti.bmj.com/content/87/Suppl_2/ii14

Syphilis infection in sex workers ranges from 8.8–9.5% in the Yunnan province to 8% in Guangdong to 3.5% in Beijing (Chen XS, personal communication, 2010).

https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article/24/4/431/503360

High levels of infection in these groups are found in most sub-Saharan African and South-East Asian countries. There is a high rate of concurrent infection for HIV and other well known STDs in patients. Rates as high as 70% of HIV infection are found in African patients with STD, whereas the rates are reaching 15–20% in patients with STD in Thailand [9,10].

Ting Tong has HIV. 1 in 5, roll the die to die. Is it really cheaper to live there with pozz med bills?

If you wanna larp as a gay guy, at least do fun things with your prostate.

If you get her a green card?

https://hyphenmagazine.com/blog/2010/05/study-finds-disturbing-std-rates-among-asian-americans

Over the course the study, Hahm unmasked some myths common about Asian Americans. She said, “There’s a perception that Asian Americans in particular aren’t practicing sexually risky behaviors.  But we found that Asian American young women are at risk of high STDs.  For instance, Asian American women had a higher prevalence of STDs than White women in both 1995 (10.4% vs. 7.7) and 2001 (13.5% vs. 8.3%).  The incidence of STDs (not diagnosed with STDs in 1995, but developed STIs in 2001) among Asian American women was also higher than that of White women.” Moreover, the power dynamic between genders became immediately clear.   Asian American women were four times more likely to have a STD than their male counterparts. “This was shocking,” said Hahm, “It was so much higher than the males.” Accounting for the gender disparity, Hahm suggested that…“Asian and Pacific Islander women also have broader interracial dating patterns than Asian American men. This might explain why these women are exposed to higher rates of STDs.”

when you mix, expect an itch

I think these findings definitely go against some prior conceptions about Asian Americans and sexually transmitted diseases. The 4:1 ratio of STDs among Asian American women to men is astounding. To see what this means, I looked up some global data of STD rates around the world, broken down by gender. In East Asia, and on every other continent, women have slightly higher STD rates than men, however nothing comes remotely close to the 4:1 ratio among Asian Americans.

It’s unclear what the study means by “power dynamic,” whether it means sexual power/demand, or power within the culture. One can speculate on a wide variety of reasons for why the STD rates are the way they are. I’ll refrain from doing so, but nevertheless I thought it was noteworthy to bring up, as a point of discussion. How does this strike you?

it means they culturally celebrate and enable whores – like the childbearing geisha

Trust no thot nor weeb.

Link: Outbreeding Depression

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/genetic_structure_and_outbreeding_depression

This phenomenon can occur in two ways. One way is by the “swamping” of locally adapted genes in a wild population by straying from, for example, a hatchery population. In this case, adaptive gene complexes in wild populations are simply being displaced by the immigration of genes that are adapted to the hatchery environment or to some other locality. For example, selection in one population might produce a large body size, whereas in another population small body size might be more advantageous. Gene flow between these populations may lead to individuals with intermediate body sizes, which may not be adaptive in either population. A second way outbreeding depression can occur is by the breakdown of biochemical or physiological compatibilities between genes in the different populations. Within local, isolated populations, alleles are selected for their positive, overall effects on the local genetic background.

Due to nonadditive gene action, the same genes may have rather different average effects in different genetic backgrounds—hence, the potential evolution of locally coadapted gene complexes. Offspring between parents from two different populations may have phenotypes that are not good for any environment. It is important to keep in mind that these two mechanisms of outbreeding depression can be operating at the same time. However, determining which mechanism is more important in a particular population is very difficult.

beige people, blandifying selection traits

In other words, genetic structure, aka, genetic correlation structure is more than additional ethnic genetic interest—it can be function, hence loss of that structure results in loss of function resulting in outbreeding depression.

….

Evidence for outbreeding depression is much less extensive than evidence for inbreeding depression, but outbreeding depression is nevertheless a general genetic phenomenon. One problem in studying outbreeding depression is the number of generations that may occur before outbreeding depression reveals itself. The effects of outbreeding enhancement due to the masking of deleterious alleles and outbreeding depression due to hybrid breakdown may cancel each other in the first generation after crossing individuals from two populations. So the effects of outbreeding depression may not be apparent for a few generations.

They just know that inbreeding is more of a problem than outbreeding—and that’s why they’re “justified” in imposing outbreeding on populations with government force and technologically amplified panmixia.

Quotes and sarcasm, deserved.

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/kinship_and_fertility

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/319/5864/813

This paper demonstrates that, in an analysis of Icelandic couples born between 1800 and 1965, there is a “significant positive association” between kinship and fertility; maximal reproductive success was observed for couples with kinship relatedness at the level of third or fourth cousins.

The authors conclude that these differences in reproductive success (i.e. fitness*) have a “biological basis” – that is, a genetic basis.

Strikingly, however, our results show that couples related at the degree of third to fourth cousins exhibited the greatest reproductive success.

In order to maximize fitness, therefore, one doesn’t have to move that far from the endogamous extreme.  Just a few rungs upward on the kinship distance ladder produces benefits superior to that of both extremes.  It’s totally irresponsible and mendacious to use the fitness costs of obvious incest to argue for reckless hybridization (**) with the most genetically distant organisms with which individuals are cross-fertile.

“It could be argued that in human populations there is a point of balance between the disadvantages associated with inbreeding versus those with outbreeding,” said Alan Bittles, director of the Center for Human Genetics at Edith Cowan University in Western Australia.

Therefore, not only is it unlikely – as has been asserted on this blog previously – that any putative “hybrid vigor” can compensate for lost parental kinship, but it’s also highly unlikely that “hybrid vigor” exists to any significant extent for most human populations past the “second cousin” level.  Defining fitness in the proper biological sense, the recent deCODE findings suggest that increased hybridity past an optimal point may in fact reduce reproductive fitness above and beyond the real losses in genetic interests due to foregone parental kinship.

From the Udry study discussed by J. Richards in a previous blog post, to the lack of any evidence of enhanced reproductive success of mixed couples and their offspring, to these latest deCODE findings that reproductive success may be maximized by closer kinship, it would seem that when in doubt, one should err on the side of increased endogamy (to the level of “third cousins” only, of course).

Duh.

When even deCODE – which decided to sift through James Watson’s ancestry and make public their dubious findings because of a politically correct distaste at what they perceived as Watson’s (presumably “racist”) comments on African intelligence levels – publishes findings that show a biologically based enhanced fitness for mating at high levels of kinship relatedness, then one must wonder how any scientifically objective individual could possibly still peddle the idea that cross-racial mating is somehow a biologically preferable choice.

Fetishes.

An important point: it’s really not so important that high kinship actually enhances reproductive fitness, or the mechanisms whereby that occurs.  More important is the lack of evidence for the contrary view: that increasing levels of exogamy leads to “hybrid vigor” and enhanced fitness.  The findings from this study constitute yet more evidence that “hybrid vigor” is not an important force – if it is one at all – for humans.

It doesn’t exist in humans, we’re not racehorses.

Prized, rare (or unique) traits like genius, maybe, but that’s kin-related, subrace max.

In the absence of such “hybrid vigor,” parental kinship takes “center stage.”  The possibility that endogamy may actually raise fitness per se, as suggested by deCODE, is just “icing on the cake,” hammering home the point that mating “between the lines” of genetically distant groups is not required for enhanced fitness.

*Reproductive success and the maintenance/expansion of distinctive genetic information are the reasonable measures of biological fitness, not whether “Tiger Woods smells better on the golf course,” or any other inane commentaries that spew forth from the addled “minds” of certain hysterical proponents of objectively maladaptive inter-racial couplings.
An example of maladaptive inter-racial hybridization is found here.  Again, that’s not even considering reproductive fitness or parental kinship, but merely negative health consequences of introducing one race’s genes into another race’s genome.

**Responsible researchers and conservationists are beginning to understand the consequences of reckless hybridization and outbreeding depression.  Some quotes, and my comments:

the available data suggest that risks of outbreeding, particularly in the second generation, are on par with the risks of inbreeding.

If there’s no advantage for hybridization in the long run, then what’s the point?  Note that this paper is talking about decisions to “intentionally hybridize” animals – we are not concerned with parental kinship when considering animals, only the relative “quality” of the resultant phenotypes.  Even with that, hybridization is questionable.  However, we are humans, and as such, have concerns above and beyond these considerations – such as kinship issues.  So, everything said about hybridization in animals holds true for humans, but, for humans, the underlying cost of hybridization – foregone parental kinship – is something additional that concerns us in dealing with mating choices.

Meanwhile, managers can minimize the risks of both inbreeding and outbreeding by using intentional hybridization only for populations clearly suffering from inbreeding depression…

Yes.  This is the conservative approach.  While Ashkenazi Jews can be said to “clearly suffer” from “inbreeding depression” the same cannot be said of European ethnic groups, or Europeans as a whole (or, for that matter, Africans, Asians, etc.).

The low IQs of Eastern Europeans are inbreeding depression.

Again – and this cannot be stressed enough – that’s not even considering parental kinship (or genetic interests in general).  The Ashkenazim may have preservationist considerations that may lead them to reject hybridization independent of whatever “benefits” genetic mixing may bring, and the cost/benefit ratio may very well favor that rejection.  However, given that Europeans are not “clearly suffering” from “inbreeding depression” there is no reason to follow Ziv’s advice and destroy our genetic interests for non-existent “benefits” to “solve” a non-existent “problem.”

Destroy yourself now because you might, at some point, destroy yourself!

….nah

….maximizing the genetic and adaptive similarity between populations…

In other words, if, for some reason, hybridization is decided upon, one should pick for the hybridization a population as genetically similar to the original population as possible.  One does not pick the most genetically distant populations possible!

…and testing the effects of hybridization for at least two generations whenever possible.

to ensure fertility, not the liger issue

Yes – instead of promoting widespread human panmixia based upon how Tiger Woods might smell on the golf course.  Of course, one may look at highly admixed populations throughout the world and use those for “testing the effects.”  Even leaving kinship concerns out of the picture, the results with respect to positive traits have not been encouraging.

While the data on outbreeding depression are dwarfed by those on inbreeding depression, the few studies that exist suggest that concerns over outbreeding should be taken seriously, as the effects can in some cases be as damaging as severe inbreeding.

Yes, taken seriously, instead of making juvenile comments about which male celebrity may be better able to “induce orgasm” in which female celebrity.  Again, given the costs for humans of foregone kinship, where are the “benefits?”

As a start, managers should strive to do no harm.

What should we think of those who, seemingly, wish to maximize harm?

That is, we should intentionally hybridize populations only when there is hard evidence that a population is suffering from inbreeding depression.

Speculation about how Tiger Woods might smell after a round of golf does not constitute said “hard evidence.”  There is no “hard evidence” that European populations (or Africans, Asians, etc.) are “suffering” from inbreeding depression.  Other small populations may be “suffering;” in that case, let those groups decide to balance the costs and benefits of hybridization – and a “pro” choice hardly means choosing the most distant groups possible as mates.

…low levels of gene flow are predicted to have disastrous effects on populations vulnerable to outbreeding (Edmands & Timmerman 2003).

Yes.

As a final postscript, readers may be interested in an alternative viewpoint with respect to the function of sexual reproduction – which stresses species and chromosomal stability over “increased genetic diversity.”

By diversity they mean the healthy range.

Unhealthy is culled by natural selection.

Also:

“Well, South Asians are the product of mixing between several Caucasoid and Asiatic people, and problems with their racial classification notwithstanding, the fact remains that European Caucasoids and East Asians clearly belong to different races.  In a classic example offered by Arthur Jensen, different bands of a rainbow blend into each other, yet this does not mean that a rainbow doesn’t contain different color bands that are easily distinguished from each other, except at the boundaries. ” marriage post (so not really gene heavy)

Genetic distance studies. Forensic skull analysis. Actually, you can clearly see group and case boundaries.

Outbreeding depression

There need to be more studies on this but I know scientists are busy with buttered toast experiments and rating their own farts.

This is the genetic thing you never hear about, despite everyone and their purebred* dog knowing about inbreeding depression.
Hybrid vigour doesn’t even apply to modern wheat.

And hybrid is misused.

I saw this explanation:

A hybrid is a cross between two closely related strains such as an Arab and a Jew or a Swede and a Spaniard. A mongrel is a cross between different races such as a Mulatto, a Mestizo, a Eurasian, etc.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123847195000733

Positive outbreeding studies are conducted on flies.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024081416729

…I don’t even, insects are already heavily inbred by default so outbreeding isn’t really possible.

Outbreeding depression is more of an issue than inbreeding (some inbreeding is good for a gene pool, the most fertile and healthy couple combinations and normal historically), which is fixed by breaking the pattern for a few generations. However, you cannot undo outbreeding depression in part due to its novelty. It’s easy to add, impossible to take away.

Click to access FrankhamConsBiol2011.pdf

Actually it’s the combination of genes that makes the organism unfit.
(The fact of lower parental singular quality aside, two mutts won’t make a prize dog).

Its ideal environment doesn’t exist. In any other environment, it’s defective.
In the race for life, they’re disabled. It’s like mixing wines, they lose their distinctive character but other examples haven’t. In a competition…

Easy example:

One nose selection gene for cold weather, one selection for hot.
Result: poorly adapted child for either.

*They care about the dog’s bloodline more than their grandkids, who will hate their guts.

The hypocrisy of Yellow Fever

I think this is pol.

yellow-fever

inb4 Muh SE Asian IQ!
Mostly nurture, mostly maths education, a select few types of Asian only. Really it’s like the Chinese studying the genetics of IQ, they’re selecting for autism (the men probably already have to think mating strategy should be based on a grade, it’s a school grade writ large and ASIANS CHEAT*). Due to their caste system, a white man will never be able to marry those quality ones. They lock you out too. If you have to play a new sport, you were a failure at the old one.

Same guys who carp on about feminists being fat, while holding at least three whole stone on their stomach.**
They do this on video. They know we can see them. I think I know why you can only attract those ‘feminazis’ dude… leagues exist, but they don’t know they’re being ripped off (less than their value in their head) in a foreign culture’s league. They can’t distinguish the faces and the class structures well enough. Boy, are they in for a shock.

Epigenetics is more important than genetics when it comes to weight. Your kids will be fat, if you’ve been fat prior to conceiving them. Marrying a woman with the body of a little girl*** (slag off Scarlett Johansson all you want for Ghost in the Shell, you will never, ever find an Asian woman with that voluptuous, womanly hourglass figure, they do not exist without surgery) won’t change your own doritos and diet cola DNA. Since you probably definitely like anime and that’s their culture or at least Asian, they’ll get heavily into it as well. Good luck selling them on identity politics when they don’t have an identity as ‘mixed’. Oh, they might become SJWs when frustrated by their dating life, lucky you. Have fun trying not to raise the next embittered, angry at all white blonde women Elliot Rodger. And he wasn’t even ugly. Still a social failure, and he was rich and thin. Welcome to the real world, Neo. These are facts.

If she is using you for your sperm/house, and she divorces you, good luck expecting any mercy from a furious dragon, one raised to think of you as the asshole that bombed/attacked her people (Oriental revenge is like Muslim, it travels down for centuries). The most callous white woman has more sympathy than an Asian woman in divorce court, I’ll be willing to bet most of those Terrible Divorce stories, that you read about in sad text posts, if you looked at the picture, it’d be an Asian woman. We all know about green card ones. They never post pictures of the ex-wife, do they? They know the reader will assume it was a white woman, you have to explicitly ask and they’re hesitant to admit it because I told you so is the rational response.  You can’t leave your league … or it will leave you.

Speaking of traditional, they do know Asian cultures are matriarchal, right? White women are the least conniving (proof below, at least physical deception) of all the races, as I’ve explained before. The Asian girls fake femininity**** itself (and even pupil size, how is that not worse than cheating with fake tan?) and have you seen what you’ve got waiting for you in middle age, what an aged Asian looks like? You don’t buy the calf, you buy the cow.

acidcow.com/girls/20695-asian-girls-before-and-after-the-makeup-75-pics.html
Conniving. They don’t even need to be female. Cheek swab for a chromosome test on a first date?

Look at it. Study this until it’s burned in your brain the next time the media tries to push Asian women as more European (in beauty) – than Europeans.
https://www.dramafever.com/news/chinese-girl-transforms-into-another-person-with-makeup/
Suuuuuure, man. O.K.
I guess that’s why they get so much surgery on their eyes. Because they don’t hate themselves or wanna trick anyone.

What you want to marry, guys. Even Asian men wished they looked like that, that’s why they draw them.
Google ‘Asian girl makeup transformation’ and browse a few hours, it’s cleansing.

They don’t know the culture, they don’t know any of this.
What do they know? Anime.

animepedo

She won’t be a schoolgirl forever. She’ll be a worse tiger mom than any LA white bitch, and she won’t even be hot. At least black women mellow out with age, those guys are forward planners. Have you seen a chill Asian woman over 35? Have you seen one that didn’t turn into a raisin at menopause? When they ‘travel’ to these countries, they only look at the prime, early peak (spoiled) ages, 15-25. They don’t look at the older women, men have a known blindness to this. Joke’s on them, aside from having children with psychiatric issues because their parents hate themselves (I’ve linked to those heartbreaking stories before), who won’t be able to date/mate with anyone other than other Mixed Race (that means black, your grandkids will probably be black), they’ll be stuck with a woman from a foreign culture they didn’t take one month to learn about and observe, who’ll dominate him so hard that he begs for death.

I encourage them, once they’ve left the white gene pool, to stay out.

I heard it once from a very blunt Chinese man “once you go rice hat, they don’t want you back.”
By all means, show off your Asian waifu. Please, warn us in advance to avoid you.

Worst of all, those kids will be UGLY. Have you seen those kids? This isn’t even a race thing, they just look like their parents. It’s just that their parents were ugly so the children look deformed. Like you warped their face in photoshop. Look it up, look around at a heavy traffic area, you’ll see it. You think they’ll reproduce, really?

*Yes that applies to sexual cheating, once her Asian duty is done by giving birth and she doesn’t need your dick anymore (Asian husbands are severely under-sexed, explaining the creepy porn, they’re obligated to produce children, not to screw). But if they’re so smart, why is cheating epidemic in Asia just to match European Uni standards…? Riddle me that, motherfucker. Indian girls are the smart Asians, but I have a feeling they’d be disgusted at the idea of marrying one (they prefer the also fake hairless look for some porn strange porn reason). Confuse sexual beauty for childlike and pervert Darwin to do it. Object when you call this creepy. Not an insult, a description.

**Have you noticed the bitchiest commentators slagging off short hair (hello Hepburn) as ugly, are themselves ugly, constantly sweating on the face (bad diet) and very, very bald?

***The irony being that the feminists are in a better genetic position, since playing the racial roulette is a high risk strategy for attractive children, you get very stacked odds against. A very masculine woman and a very feminine man can have highly attractive children, unlike the kid with some name after an anime character whose eyes look like that super-high cat look the drag queens do. You have to see it, to see what I mean but it’s uncanny valley, like a half-Asian Cumberbatch but more alien. The slightest bit of fat on their face, and it’s even worse, the eye narrowing is plain weird to watch with Western double lids.

**** They have to be really girly, or their little girl looks would seem incongruent and creepy to you. It’s an act and it disappears once she gets what she wanted (usually a ring on it). Watch the way her mother chides her father in a quiet moment for breathing, it’s worse than any Shakespearean shrew, that’s waiting for you.

They deserve all they get. They didn’t listen, let them learn.
go on moss popcorn

I’ll peace out with two images for the It’s Not So Bad crowd.

My personal favourite.


Continue to look down on ‘white trash’.

Link: Does race-mixing increase physical attractiveness?

https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/893/

“Leroi and Razib need to understand that in so far as physical attractiveness related to a genetic constitution associated with better canalization of development and developmental stability is concerned, mixed-race individuals are expected to be, on average, worse off than individuals with little other-race genetic admixture.  Razib may mention hybrid vigor (offspring better than parents, overall, on average) and ignore the possibility of what appears to be more likely—which I will elaborate on in the future: outbreeding depression (offspring worse than parents, overall, on average).”

Give that man a cookie. Good read. Quite detailed, not long enough.

Imho, this woman has retained her Anglo-features, a better study would be to look at her genome (and others of mixed race) and see which % they inherited from each of their parents, and of these, how many dominant features from the races considered lower on the general attractiveness scales (to put it PC for once).


Source: majorityrights.com/images/uploads/newsweek.jpg

Although Indian features are easy to spot in profile (mostly in the nasal projection and an inverted bridge curve). The women can be quite beautiful if they have a small nose e.g. Aishwarya Rai, with Nord-European coloration of the eyes but typical puffy ‘pillow’ lips.
Actually, it’s quite funny to trace the European coloration by hair color. It works very well as a predictor. Southern Europe is largely black-dark brown with a smoother thicker texture, mid-Europeans, as England for example, have medium-light brown with a fine wave texture, and the uppermost Nordic countries have the highest percentages of blonde, with medium thickness and often curls. Although there is a scatter of darker blondes in England, for instance, and redheads are exactly where you would expect, in Ireland, mid-European level. The isolation of Ireland preserved their recession and many papers have predicted the redhead will die out in a century or two.

Certainly, white people have the most visual variation in colour of any race, since we hit the entire scale. I’ve noted the rare mixed race women who are truly beautiful (most, contrary to media stereotype, have an unnatural combination of features bordering on creepy/uncanny valley), they mute the more dominant features of the less pleasing parentage within a distinctly European bone structure (I’m trying to be polite). Pics or it doesn’t happen, right?

The stunning Vanessa Williams proves my point more than words ever could.

However, such women are the exception of the mixed, incredibly rare, not the rule. Hollywood has tried to pass these creatures off as the norm. And it’s unfair to hold them to a single race’s standard, I think the movement to have a mixed classification in its own right is the …fair move (sorry).

This woman puts it better.
https://nicolamarven.wordpress.com/2014/04/11/mixed-race-people-are-not-beautiful/

All this makes me physically cringe from the screen.  What are they doing?  Don’t they realise the damage they’re causing by perpetuating this beautiful little brown baby bullshit? Oh! What lovely end-products of interracial social cohesion!  It’s as bad as a Channel 4 programme I once saw made by an anxious middle-class Asian mother.  She was eager to prove that the product of her marriage with a white English man would not be inferior, and so went around to scientists and researchers getting them to say stupid things about how mixed-race people might be smarter or have more symmetrical faces.  What a load of mul(atto) poo.  It’s as bad as phrenology.  It’s actually – ironically – racist.  And yes, of course you can be racist against mixed-race people.  The thing is though, we’re unlikely to have a cohesive voice to shout back at you but, brilliantly, because we’re as mixed-up as your teenage daughter’s underwear drawer, you can’t get out of it.  There’s no “Oh but I can’t be racist against them because I’m X or Y or have Z as a friend” crap.  Bad luck loser, we’re EVERYTHING.  There’s no hiding. Time to confront your own messed-up xenomania.

I like this woman. She’s honest.

We’re not products.  We’re people.  And some people are ugly.  Some people are really ugly. Some black people are ugly, some white people are ugly, some frickin Filipineseafrojafaican people are ugly.  Why should the racial mixing suddenly make people beautiful?  What is beautiful anyway?  It’s got nothing to do with race.  Saying mixed-race people are more beautiful than others is the WORST thing you can do for the mixed-race community.

It’s too much pressure for any race. I think each group should have its own beauty standards e.g. T or A or L, without feeling the need to compete on something largely gifted at birth.

Hybrid vigour is indeed a racist caricature, derived from comparing slave humans to horse breeds (they wanted the better workers so ‘bred’ their slaves together, arranging marriages, for more muscular men, for instance). Thankfully, as I’ve covered, hybrid vigour is a myth, in fact the evidence suggests a single instance of truly outbreeding (ancestors from two completely separate continents, neighbouring countries are fine), as it’s called, is as bad in general as generations of inbreeding (two to three generations during famine produces little difference or most of Europe would be thick).

Do you see what I mean about the Uncanny Valley though? The PC way to put it is an alarming tendency toward the … evolutionally novel. They look like they don’t fit.

A standard of their own would be fitting and better for a healthy sense of esteem without treading on toes.

“You think these things because these women are not seen The Other.  They are not seen as their race, they are just seen as women.”

applause all around hiddleston

Exactly, just because the science suggests one thing in theory is no excuse to be bitchy to one another IRL. You do you.
They had no control over it, it’s their parents fault (Eurasian men are especially bitter about this) and it’s each human’s duty to make the best of the beauty hand they were dealt.

Update: listen, we can’t all be Nutan. Consider how many Indians had to breed to get to a woman who looks suspiciously white (dormant genes exist – epigenetics).

nutan beauy

The Latina beauty standard is actually Spanish, which is a mixture of pampered English skin, French manners and Italian looks. Before Coco Chanel held us to male field labourer standards… thanks, you anorexic Nazi-fucking whore. I don’t want to see a 12yo painted orange and dressed in drag. That’s no role model.

The sheer majority of mixed race propaganda is all Italian in description. Dark, glossy hair, a tan and curves. This is rare, even in Europe.

that's enough stop please karen will and grace

I mean, I can fit it, so thank you, but also fuck you guys for implying there’s anything wrong with blondes with green eyes. It’s harsh and uncalled for.

Link: Male Yellow Fever, female White Fever and the terrible burden of mix children

https://longingfordeath.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/asian-women-and-white-men-the-truth-from-a-eurasian-male/

It is dark.

Little surprise mixed children have high rates of genetic disease (outbreeding is equally as damaging as inbreeding) and psychiatric illness, considering the number their own parents do on them. Imagine knowing one party was a perv who probably believed that myth that Asian women have smaller vaginas (they do not, all women are practically the same size according to my manwhore friends, how would that even work evolutionally for childbirth) and the other superficially wanting whiter looking children regardless of the consequences to that child. Both parents self hate their own race and it’s passed on.

Selfishness is the cardinal sin of parenting.

We are lauded up as some kind of beautiful Hapa miracle children, but in reality we are born out of nothing other than cultural fetishization and the pursuit of certain physical attributes, neither of which we are capable of having, since we are, after all, Asian men. Only after we are born do our parents begin to panic and start trying to instill self-esteem in us by teaching us about our heritage, falsely encouraging us to believe that we will be accepted by whites, or worse, by Asians, the same Asians that our mothers were trying to escape from. But it’s obvious by just going outside, where you can see White male / Asian woman couples sitting next to other white male / Asian woman couples they don’t even know – that love is not colorblind, and as a Eurasian male this became evident to me in my teens.

I don’t blame them for hating their parents or the races they belong to. No wonder they’re ingrouping to other mixed race kids for identification. That’s like their parental substitute. The parents were irresponsible and should be ashamed of themselves.

Littlefinger would own you at Rock Paper Scissors

The Myth of ‘Hybrid Vigour’: Mixed Race/Beige People lies

This was intended to go in another drafted post but it ended up longer than the original draft topic. As a tangent this is worth detailed excavation. It operates on no logical, genetic, moral level.

Reminder: The most ‘mixed’ Europeans (with other Europeans) are pure as driven snow:
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/01/23/genetics-white-americans-are-very-white/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/01/23/genetic-study-white-americans-are-98-6-european/

The Beige People are promoted, and there is much mainstream media extolling of their imagined virtues, contrary to… evidence.

Wrong on so many levels. First of all, blondes would be dead as the dodo. Her eyes would be dark brown. Look up the female fertility rate by nation, she’d be practically entirely black. Read some Mendel for how that would work out.

There are people who salivate over this prospect: ” “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.” Sickeningly racist.
This also flies in the face of recent genetic evolution, that clearly shows a divergence: “Human races are evolving away from each other,” Harpending says. “Genes are evolving fast in Europe, Asia and Africa, but almost all of these are unique to their continent of origin. We are getting less alike, not merging into a single, mixed humanity.” Further, “We show that humans are changing relatively rapidly on a scale of centuries to millennia, and that these changes are different in different continental groups.”
The myth of so-called hybrid vigour flies in the face of the most probable causes of desirable characteristics such as intelligence, for example low genetic load. Exactly what it sounds like. If you divide rocks between barrels, you’re still carrying rocks, the same load of rocks and this is why the latest developments in healthcare are refining treatments based on the common ailments of the patient’s demographic (race). Paying attention to this stuff is literally saving lives. 

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(08)61886-3/abstract
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/38950/title/On-Race-and-Medicine/

Hybrid vigour has been given the PC name ‘heterosis’ but its origins lie in the racism of claiming slaves are hardier when bred like prize animals. It is quite literally Scientific Racism to claim we must breed out the evolved diversity of innate differences of humans as if we’re cattle. Most people have a confirmed tendency toward genophilia and prefer to date and reproduce within their own race, what if this majority refuse? As we all know from LGBT+ campaigning, who you are sexually attracted to (and not to) can never be a choice.
“We intend to create in Europe a mixed race of Asiatic and Negroid people” source

However, The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study found Whites scored the highest at IQ106 and the mixed race IQ99, slightly below average. At best, the studies in this area have shown the mixed child averages between their parents, much like the inherited finding for height. The ‘magic dirt’ hypothesis of immigration is groundless and fell prey to the Sociologist’s Fallacy: “The evolutionary theory does however predict that when different races occupy approximately similar environments, such as for instance in the United States, Britain and the Netherlands, the intelligence differences will remain. This prediction has been examined in twenty three societies worldwide in Lynn (2008) and has been confirmed in every case.” – Lynn in 2010.


This bodes well for a global high IQ future.
Which leads to a healthy, growing economy.
There is no other way to do this but encourage WEIRD IQ levels.
Which are inherited.

The Flynn Effect has tailed off since nutrition has been resolved for children, the factor is finished and the formula/data tinkered with to follow its projections for publication (sounds familiar) but in all likelihood it is a demonstration of measurement error writ large, as modern supposedly more intelligent people struggle even with the language of previous generations, let alone their testing standards. This should not be possible [black swan/negative evidence]
Mixed studies are rarely done and beg the question – a mix of whom? A mixed children of European races, further subdivided into Northern/South territories could present IQ gains as the nations are high IQ, high technology societies already. A parent from these combined with a parent from a low IQ undeveloped nation could not. Furthermore, it is remiss to ignore the validity of genetic ties to native homeland, bound up in human rights. Globally, White people are a strict minority and such experimentation would clearly violate the UN conditions for genocide. Moreover, the recessive genomic nature of White traits, compared to and unlike all other races, mark it as unsuitable for such experiments intending to knowingly dominate and replace such natives with outgroup gene sequences, and would make it a form of institutional ethnic cleansing. Legally, these recessive races should deserve protections from such interference in much the same way as we protect endangered species. Or is a bird’s life worth more than that of a human? Reservations now or reservations later.
Altogether, mixed race children have poorer environmental outcomes (such as higher homicide rates) and it would be unethical to encourage this. One-drop theory refers to the dominance of certain racial sequences down the centuries, where unexpected baby skin coloration might arise for example. Considering Dawkin’s work, we do not truly own our genes to make this irresponsible choice, our responsibility as a carrier for them as meme will be to pass on as many of them as purely as possible into the future and this cannot be done by becoming the Mendelian cuckoldry party. Forensic anthropology have proven racial taxonomy goes down to the bone, whatever you call it. Ignoring the differences won’t stop Asia from researching them, it’s coming out eventually. You can be there or you can be on the wrong side of history. We can view these differences under a microscope, they are not imaginary. We have a duty to protect this natural diversity of Homo Sapiens into the future. Every race has a right to exist, live in their homeland and self-determine.
Hybrid vigour is a dangerous myth. There are strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages, within every single race and genetic diaspora. These are not a bad thing. They are natural. All of them. Evolution has formed them as adaptive. We cannot understand the full relevance of these varied profiles and we are ethically bound to leave them alone before meddling in the very blueprint of life.

Finally, we already know the genetic sweet spot for health when it comes to Inbreeding and Outbreeding. We would know this evolutionary boon by its natural super-fertility. 
It’s third-cousins that provide the perfect blend.

In a paper published today deCODE scientists establish a substantial and consistent positive correlation between the kinship of couples and the number of children and grandchildren they have. The study, which analyzes more than 200 years of deCODE’s comprehensive genalogical data on the population of Iceland, shows that couples related at the level of third cousins have the greatest number of offspring….

The findings hold for every 25-year interval studied, beginning with those born in the year 1800 up to the present day. Because of the strength and consistency of the association, even between couples with very subtle differences in kinship, the authors conclude that the effect very likely has a biological basis, one which has yet to be elucidated.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-02/dg-dlc020408.php
h/t: http://isteve.blogspot.co.uk/2008/02/darwinian-sweet-spot-3rd-cousin.html

Unless you can come up with stronger findings (you can’t) –

Stop lying.