China’s been buying American food supply

Don’t skip this one. If you eat, this is important.

https://www.revealnews.org/article/how-china-purchased-a-prime-cut-of-americas-pork-industry/

That is a national security issue.
You need the food supply for your own nation.
I’ve yet to hear any politician here say this is a problem. For the whole West.
Britain is doing it too, as covered with our heritage pork industry but here’s America.

This is a plot.

“These are not Russian communists. They like Americans.”

Traitors, traitors everywhere.

Casual Russophobia, the shell game of politics.

Chinese companies, at the urging of their government, have launched a global buying spree, a new phase in their unprecedented economic experiment. And they’re targeting a resource that climate scientists, economists, the U.S. government, even Wall Street, all forecast will become dangerously scarce in the coming decades: food.”
“Food is poised to become the oil of the 21st century, with scarcity and demand creating a situation ripe for wars, riots and uprisings.
“We have a situation in the world food economy today where the growth in demand is exceeding the supply,” said Lester Brown, a food economist and founder of the Earth Policy Institute.
Food – namely crops such as soy, wheat and corn from which most other food products, such as pasta, bread and livestock meat, are derived – is in dwindling abundance as the world’s population grows ever larger, adding 220,000 mouths to feed every day.”

Need I say I told you so or is that Malthus’ place?

Thessalonians comes to mind.

“It is part of the transition from an age of surplus to one of scarcity,” Brown said.’

Read: FAMINE.

“The world is set for a geopolitical struggle over food.”

Those trigger war, we need a pandemic.

The Chinese government already is dealing with looming food shortages within its own borders as tens of millions are eating more as they move from poverty into the middle class. The government is pushing Chinese businesses – both state-owned and privately held – to gobble up agricultural resources from around the world, including Africa, Europe and the United States.”

That should be illegal as part of national security.

Food security, clue is in the name.

“With the Smithfield purchase, a Chinese company now owns 1 in 4 pigs raised in the U.S.”

But I’m imagining things and why do prices keep going up?

You’re funding fat Chinese citizens. To learn who rules over you….

“The question for U.S. lawmakers is: Did the Smithfield takeover represent business as usual for international commerce, or did it signal a concerted effort to control food supplies by one of the world’s most powerful governments?”

#yawn

“If the Chinese government was involved in the 2013 deal, some influential U.S. lawmakers say they need to take action to protect against foreign intervention in a vital U.S. resource.”

It’s more vital than stealing weapons technology in colleges.

“He testified to Congress that the Chinese government has no management control over Shuanghui.
That, however, is not the case.”

Ooooof course it is.

“a research lab that had genetically engineered the leanest pigs on earth”

Why modern pork isn’t as healthy as real pork. You can’t even get fatback anymore.
Bacon is a traditional Saxon meal, it merits legal protected status.
He goes on to blame the ‘shareholders’. No, put on your big boy pants and do the difficult job of telling them No.

“And Colaco knew Pope’s interest in buying a 20 percent stake in China’s largest meat company, Shuanghui International.”

How? Spying. And that’s bribery, the exchange ‘offer’.

The Chinese already consume half of the world’s pork,

greedy piggies

and they are growing wealthier and hungrier for meat every year. In a single generation, China’s fast-growing wealth has transformed a nation of impoverished rice and noodle eaters into the world’s largest middle class, which can increasingly afford meat in its diet.”

Any vegan who starts on the West instead of China doesn’t understand math. They calculate per person (wrong) but when you consider volumes, Asia is clearly starving out the rest of the world, including their precious Africa.
Most Westerners have been priced out of their birthright because suppliers are allowed to sell to foreigners first, rich ones.

Remember how the Chinese are eating most of it for the gaslighting lower down.

“Wan had transformed a government-owned slaughterhouse, where he was appointed manager in 1984, into China’s largest meat company”

Coincidence, I’m sure.

“Pope proposed to Wan that they take a 20 percent stake in each other’s companies. Smithfield would gain a powerful ally in Wan, who is politically connected to China’s top leaders and also a member of the National People’s Congress.”

Is Trump going to move on any of this?

“The partnership would be equal, reflecting the fact that although Smithfield Foods generated more than twice the revenue and was far more advanced in terms of global reach and pork technology than Shuanghui, growth rates in China were far higher.”

Doesn’t sound equal. That actually sounds like a downside, demand side loses in capitalism.

“It was a match made in free-market heaven.”

‘Libertarians’ are whores for the richest foreigner.
Treasonous whores.

Using the word free while selling out your country. For shame.

If libertarians didn’t sell the farm (cough) to China after WW2 their population would’ve stabilized as well and we wouldn’t have these problems.

And since when do we care so much about rich Chinese over our own people? That’s their Government’s problem, not ours. The rank classism of this reeks.

“Pope picked up the phone. Colaco cut straight to the deal. The Chinese were ready, he said. But it wasn’t a partnership they wanted.”

Classic manipulation tactic and the greedy piggy fell for it. Modern men are weak.

I’d have laughed and slammed the phone down.

“Smithfield is not for sale,” Pope shot back.’

Sure he did – and everybody clapped.

“But I do like this discussion,” he finished.’

Crooked CEOs are worse than politicians. The latter you can vote out and hang.

“Both Pope and Colaco told me that they remembered the call as cordial and succinct.”

You agreed to sell a part of your country’s history quickly?

“The Chinese didn’t want to save him. They wanted to buy him.”

Well, he is a whore. They were right.

New Money, they think if they buy the world they ‘win’ and become the new dominant Empire.
Treat everyone like a whore for sale is their MO.

“The U.S. Treasury Department was in the midst of reviewing the takeover for any national security risks. That review, by an obscure office within the department, was to remain classified per U.S. law.”

It should’ve been cancelled, simple as.
Here’s the part I mentioned before, Americans priced out of America.

“Two years earlier, the Chinese government had signaled its strong desire for overseas agriculture. It had unveiled its five-year plan, which amounts to the Communist Party’s roadmap for the country’s economy. A major focus of this plan: buying up overseas farmland and foreign food companies.

Why is American homesteading land so expensive, Americans?

In 2011, the year the five-year plan was announced, Chinese nationals owned $81 million worth of U.S. farmland.

Repatriate it, simply refuse to acknowledge their ownership claim as valid due to foreign security issues. We do it all the time.

By the end of 2012, the Chinese owned $900 million in U.S. farmland – a 1,000 percent increase – making them the largest buyers that year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

You should’ve known when they changed the soldier breeding programme to two children despite over-population.

The Smithfield deal included another $480 million in U.S. farmland, which would push the Chinese stake to nearly $1.4 billion in less than two years.”

Successful nations don’t sell land or companies to outsiders.
This should be the law, it needs to be enforced. It’s a type of border control.

“He testified that the Chinese government had absolutely no management control in Shuanghui.”

He lied, was he under oath?

“Pope explained that the deal would create jobs in the U.S., not destroy them. Shuanghui’s plan to import more American pork would ramp up production at Smithfield’s 460 hog farms, creating more money for farmers and more jobs at the slaughterhouses.”

And more food to a foreign army to kill all the people you ‘gave’ jobs.
Don’t work with Commies, eventually they’ll shoot you too.

“I think it is good for America. I think this is the opportunity America has been looking for to import jobs.”

Wait, visas?

“Stabenow pushed back. She wanted to know why Smithfield could not increase its sales to China as an American company and why only a takeover by a Chinese firm would open the doors to the world’s largest pork market. The Chinese government was unfairly blocking American hog farmers from exporting there, she said.”

A patriot. They ignored her, didn’t they?
She was right, so they did.

“American grain companies had supported the deal. In the past five years, China has become their biggest foreign customer.”

You say ‘American’.

Is it (((American)))?

“Roberts lampooned criticism of the deal, asking Pope, “Did you realize you were the victim of a Chinese communist plot?”
Laughter broke out in the hearing. Pope chuckled.”

They know it’s treason.

“For Wan, who had served as a foot soldier in Mao Zedong’s army….”

Was he one of the cannibals?
[Probably].

“Shuanghui is now China’s largest meat company, and with the addition of Smithfield Foods, it has become the world’s largest producer of packaged meats, pumping out millions of tons of hot dogs and sausages every year.”

As American as your hot dogs?
Armies need protein.
The signs were there.

“The campus also has a massive refrigerated warehouse larger than a football field. It houses something found only in China: a national pork reserve. Much as the U.S. government maintains a strategic oil reserve, China stashes away vast amounts of frozen pork in case of price inflation or war. The mammoth warehouse I was staring at housed 110 million pounds. It is one of the many pork-reserve warehouses that Shuanghui operates for the government across China.”

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED.

“or war”, they write blithely.

Hoping you won’t notice. But we did.

“He said Smithfield’s processing equipment was three times faster.”

Great deal for them – America not so much.

“It also stated something surprising. Shuanghui is required to adhere to Beijing’s five-year plan, the Communist Party’s national economic agenda. And the document was clear. Shuanghui meets its obligations and follows the path laid out by the Communist Party.”

Are you surprised? I’m not.

“Despite its public listing in Hong Kong, Shuanghui answers to the Chinese government – going beyond regulatory compliance. It receives directives from Beijing, and it follows them. The company’s candidness surprised me, especially because U.S. senators had been sparring over this exact topic a year earlier. Here was conclusive proof.”

Is the sell-out in jail? No? Wow, almost like a Cabal is protecting him.

“He broke it down for me. The Chinese government acts like a de facto board of directors for the country’s domestic industries – even for publicly traded companies like Shuanghui. The Communist Party issues the five-year plan, and Shuanghui is expected to follow that direction. The government can say it wants the Chinese meat industry to employ certain strategies, and all domestic companies are expected to adhere. Yet the day-to-day management of the company, how it chooses to carry out those directives, is left to the company’s management. And if there is no directive, the company is free to proceed as it views best.”

Communism.

“For helping carry out the government’s agenda, Shuanghui received a $4 billion loan to take over Smithfield. The loan was approved in a single day.”

Woooow.

“I asked Robert Wan why the government was so interested in Shuanghui’s business.
“Pork is considered a national security issue in China,” he said.”

BOOM.

Pork is considered a national security issue in China”

oh, but the guy acting white was really gracious? He was laughing at you.

You can’t spend their fake money if you’re dead.

“They are entering a new phase of development, one that is taking them outside of China’s borders as they look to acquire companies and farmland overseas.”

How was WW2 won? Farms.

Watch the farms.

“The jobs will remain. But they will be lower-quality, lower-paid jobs of hog slaughtering and hog breeding,” she said. “The higher-paid, higher-value-added jobs that deal with marketing the products, processing the food, the technology development, that will go.”

Again, Libertarians are whores. Free market is code for globalist. We used to just call those traitors.

“With its five-year plan in 2011, the Chinese government identified meat processing as a strategically important industry, and with the Smithfield purchase, the country gained access to the world’s most advanced animal rearing, slaughtering and meat processing and distribution technology, she said.”

National security, you’ve boosted theirs.

“Haley has testified before Congress several times on how China’s growth is damaging the U.S. economy.”

They ignored her.

“The Chinese will quickly import Smithfield’s technology to China”
“The United States increasingly will become a large hog farm for the Chinese”

Think of the cost if they included the oil barrels to ship. Why isn’t that law?
Globalization will fail for that reason, spending $20 to send a product halfway around the world and ‘save’ 20 cents is doomed to fail.

“Hog farming is one of the most polluting industries in the world, and so that will occur in Smithfield and elsewhere, the 400-plus farms that Smithfield and now Shuanghui owns around the United States,”

Well at least America gains in pollution.

“But here it is in its simplest form: Haley has found that China begins by importing the technological know-how and raw materials from the U.S. Then Chinese businesses use cheap labor to manufacture products for export back to the United States – offering lower prices in direct competition with established businesses in the U.S. This part of her theory is obviously not new.
But here is where she advances the conversation: She has found that even in industries in which the labor cost of the final product is relatively low, meaning it accounts for 2 to 7 percent of the total, Chinese companies still are able to sell the product for 25 to 30 percent less than their American competitors. In other words, China’s big advantage is not just the cheaper labor.
So what is it? Heavy subsidies from the Chinese government, she says.”

War. Trade war.
The Trojan Horse of Trade.

When you think about it, globalism is really a way of saying international Marxism because it erases national borders and fulfills the “to each according to his ability…” dogma.

“Chinese businesses are able to undercut the prices of American producers and begin to control a larger and larger share of the market.”

You need to shame people for buying Chinese.

The oil barrels used to ship, the slave labour, lots of ways to go about it.

The quality argument, they did knowingly sell toxic baby formula.

“In two to five years, we will start noticing major changes in the United States. China will be in many agricultural sectors, not just pork. China will start acquiring much larger farms, for example. China will start consolidating,” she said. “So, in these oligopolistic industries, such as pork, where four manufacturers control over 75 percent of the American pork industry, there will be much price cutting, layoffs, etc., as competitors start feeling the hot breath of China on their necks.”

That’s now.
Good luck MAGA with that millstone.

I don’t hate China, as some shills have claimed, I love my people in America. If America fails, we’re on the block next.
China is oppressing them in the most under-handed ways in a manner tantamount to a declaration of war. Stealing food supply? Super-villain territory.

BTW, you’re still paying China foreign aid.

““The Chinese, in my opinion, are behaving rationally. Food is in short supply in China. It’s a source of unrest in China,” Haley said. “They have OK’d the acquisition of agriculture in the United States to further Chinese interests.”

Anti-American interests.

“China and the U.S. are roughly the same size geographically – about 3.7 million square miles. But China has more than four times as many people to feed.

r-selection ends predictably
the checks won’t clear eventually

And it has less arable land than the U.S.”

As in, without buying America’s food security, they’d instantly lose a war.
It’s cheaper for them to buy America itself than buy from America every year.

“Moving toward a meat-centric diet has put an incredible strain on China’s agriculture system. Simply put, Chinese farmers can no longer keep up.”

By buying from China, you’re directly supporting the Chinese Communist government.

Communists make the best slavers, they actually believe they’re doing good.

‘Chinese officials only recently have recognized the futility of their long-cherished national goal of food self-sufficiency, said Fred Hu, former head of Goldman Sachs for greater China.

Not high IQ then. As if the Marxism didn’t give it away.

China will have to import a large quantity of foods from all over the world,” said Hu, a Chinese national who helped raise funds for Shuanghui and now advises his government.

Until we blockade it. Which we’ll have to, to feed our own people.

He agreed with Haley that food is increasingly a matter of political stability for the Chinese government.
“We have a one-party state, and the Communist Party depends on its ability to deliver economic prosperity and consumer satisfaction,” Hu said. “In that way, for the severe shortage of any particular food item, or very significant price inflation, that could be a source of public discontent.”’

The way to beat China is ruthless capitalism, stop buying from them and jack up the prices.

“The government also ordered its domestic food producers to scour the globe, buying foreign companies and agricultural resources that China could control in the coming decades”

During a war, your enemy owns your food. Who wins?

Seige warfare on vulnerable domestic civilians is sneaky little ratbag warfare. Typical r-types. Attack the children, elderly and sick. They suffer first under food supply disruptions.

China is securing food supplies – increasingly, high-end food such as meat – for its middle class.”

You said national security, that means military.

“The U.S. still enjoys probably the highest living standards in the world,” he said. “My advice for you in the West, after your criticisms, is that you probably should eat less meat to control weight and to stay healthy, right?”

Gaslighting microdick. That’s a Mean Girls tier insult.

He just tried to neg white people. They’re really insecure, huh?

Actually eating meat is healthier and Americans are fat due to processed carbs, they know this.

Trump should specially stamp every product from China or a Chinese company so people have informed consent when buying.

That’s the best, simplest solution. Totally legal, more legal than the current labelling.

PRODUCT OF CHINA in huge letters on the front with the Marxist symbol in blood red.

So other people can see you’re buying it too.

After all, informed consent. People should know which government and ideology their money supports.

Actually, why isn’t there a public list of companies that seem domestic but are actually foreign owned? People have a right to boycott if they please.

“Everyone wants to see China succeed. It’s an old civilization,” she said.

No, if they win, you lose. Zero sum. They’re heartless monsters, their culture is one of torture.

“But it is our government’s prerogative and our government’s responsibility to look out for the interests of U.S. consumers and U.S. industry, just as the Chinese are looking out for their industry and their customers.”

trans. Do your job. You’re not Mother Theresa.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, who asked Haley to testify before the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, said the U.S. government needs to do more to protect U.S. agriculture.
She is calling on the Treasury Department, which reviews foreign acquisitions of major U.S. businesses, to expand the definition of national security to include food. Such a change could prevent future takeovers of America’s farm and food companies.
Food is too vital an industry for the American people to allow it to be undercut by the Chinese government in the way that it has happened in other industries, Stabenow said when I visited her office in Washington.
“Food security is national security,” she said. “It’s as much a threat for Americans if we don’t control our own food supply as it is if another country gets some kind of defense secret.”

Food production is a defense secret.

In tiny text again: “Food is poised to become the oil of the 21st century, with scarcity and demand creating a situation ripe for wars, riots and uprisings.”

Pope still denies the Government connection, meaning he knew all along.

“But for the first time, he publicly acknowledged the Chinese government’s five-year plan.”

Traitor.

“In many respects, this is carrying out the government’s five-year plan, which is to improve the quality and the security of their food supply,”

Keyword: security.

“Pope said Smithfield Foods now is transferring its technology to China”

Muh jobs!
Maybe Pope giving a blowjob under the table to the Chinese Government.

“It will process the meat in China and sell it under the Smithfield brand, according to the company.”

How many American brands have been gutted?
Do the American people not have a right to know in the labeling?

It’s false advertising to use an American brand for a non-American company.

Cultural appropriation is serious business. Especially when it’s used to subvert the culture in question.

“I handed him the Bank of China document that stated the government’s financial support for the deal.”
“I think the concern that others should have is that there’s going to be more foreign companies wanting to buy U.S. companies,” Pope said. “We need to have a bit of concern that what we’ve got, others value more than we do.”

The nerve.

Your choice, America. Label your products correctly or allow foreign governments to literally buy your food over you.

Currently, a lot of “your” food is reserved for a Chan or Wan. The good stuff.

Oh, and stop remittance. That’s an easy one. You hemorrhage money there. Tax it to the hilt.

Fund your replacement says Bill Gates

Nice try, I posted about this yeeears ago.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/sep/18/the-african-youth-boom-whats-worrying-bill-gates

“What worries Bill Gates most?”

The orange snazzy number with his name on it?

“The booming population of Africa looms over his foundation’s latest global survey.”

Ah, of course. The old reliable.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/09/11/comic-the-routine/

“By the end of this century there will be 4 billion more people on Earth –”

no there won’t, you know there won’t, but you need to rob the people from the present while they’re still alive

“and 3 billion of these extra souls will be born in Africa. The challenge, he says”

what reverse psychology?

and this isn’t our problem, it’s theirs

they have governments to solve their problems

white people should leave/stay out of it

“is that “Africa must almost quadruple its agricultural productivity to feed itself. That’s very daunting.””
War and famine. It can’t even handle its current or former populations, this is heavily IQ and also the laziness of refusing to farm.
If Africans want to escape Bill Gates, they should be allowed to. They’re frightened of him.

So aborting them would be genocide but not white people?

Bet your life on it?

The Romans didn’t need mobile phones

https://singularityhub.com/2018/05/06/leapfrogging-tech-is-changing-millions-of-lives-heres-how/#sm.0001m4bpkjv3qd4nxh12rj926apnx

This won’t end well.

They’ve built a house on sand.

“Even as countries tackle these issues, population growth could toss the biggest wrench into the spokes of continued progress. Though Sub-Saharan Africa’s poverty rate declined by 13 percent between 1990 and 2013, the absolute number of people living in poverty actually rose by 113 million.”

but Malthus is redundant, the good times last forever, right, 1928?

OT Plenty of people in the West don’t have mobile phones so why don’t they get free ones?

So you know SHTF in Africa when the cell towers go down.

Population, r-selection, food supply and famine

I wanted to throw you some further data that doesn’t quite fit in the UK-specific economic post I’ve planned. It does, however, affect our economy, especially our local (European) food supply and costs. It squeezes our own development by virtue of a see-saw, either they command these resources (our landmass and its fruits) or we do.

Previous: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/07/update-to-population-point-in-automation/
Originally: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/06/what-is-automation/

Premise: R-selection, to breed beyond the resources of your land, is suicidal in the long-run but also reduces standard of living in the short.

https://population.org.au/articles/2011-09-16/population-growth-damages-standard-living

“Those states with the highest rates of population growth suffered the largest reduction in standard of living”, said Dr John Coulter, Vice President of Sustainable Population Australia commenting on the latest ABS population data released yesterday.”

This could easily be predicted because, as resources are constant and finite, by increasing the demand, there will be less per head, or a lower standard of living. We can also see this in food prices, with extra-European over-population, beyond locally sustainable levels, basic costs go up, primarily the most fundamental cost being foodstuffs themselves.

If you complain about data volume, here is some going back to 1264.
https://ourworldindata.org/food-prices/

Why would food be important in discussions of population? /sarc
You’re sustainable or you’re dead. The system, ecosystem, is efficient and supportive of its lifeforms, or else it fails. There is no wiggle room for error or data concealment.

http://www.worldwatch.org/global-food-prices-continue-rise-0

“As both climate change and population growth continue to increase, there is reason to believe that food commodity prices will be both higher and more volatile in the decades to come.”

https://www.ft.com/content/84807466-c91d-11e7-ab18-7a9fb7d6163e
We in Britain currently eat from food banks so some Chinese parvenu can eat a roast chicken and feel successful and vote Hammer & Sickle. Where is the social justice outrage? [proof at end]
Petrol has gone down in the same time so no, you can’t blame oil.
To go from this century’s statistics.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/315418/foodpocketbook-2013update-29may14.pdf
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130124042648/http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/files/defra-stats-foodfarm-food-pocketbook-2012-130104.pdf

In a report from 2012: “Food prices have risen 12% in real terms over the last five years taking us back to 1997 in terms of cost of food relative to other goods.” “In May 2012 the main food issue of concern to respondents was food prices at 63%, an increase from 60% in November 2011.”
Sounds vaguely like hyperinflation. I’m sure that has no political consequences whatsoever.

Caring is not a choice. We’re producing more food than before, but it’s going out, away to greedy nations like China. [see end]
https://www.trusselltrust.org/2017/04/25/uk-foodbank-use-continues-rise/

Yes, it affects me.
https://foodfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FoodInsecurityBriefing-May-2016-FINAL.pdf
It affects my people.
“The survey found that 28% of adults skimped on their own food in the last year so that others in their households could eat”
Back to the rest of the world:

“Between 2000 and 2012, the World Bank global food price index increased 104.5 percent, at an average annual rate of 6.5 percent.”

“Food prices will also likely be driven up by population growth, increasing global affluence, stronger linkages between agriculture and energy markets, and natural resource constraints. According to the FAO, although high food prices tend to aggravate poverty, food insecurity, and malnutrition, they also represent an opportunity to catalyze long-term investment in agriculture, which could boost resilience to climate change and augment global food security.”

That is one loud canary, isn’t it?

That growth is not possible, the planet is not infinite, infinite growth is impossible. Soil erosion, for instance, is making it so there is LESS arable land in the world over time and this change appears permanent, caused by over-farming….
Britain figured out its business with an Agricultural Revolution, places like China try to outsource their inability to feed their population (Commies) instead of farming responsibly and denying its population the luxuries they purchase on credit and continue to demand.

Here’s a good article that goes into erosion.
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/nov/26/why-seed-banks-arent-the-only-answer-to-food-security

The technology they need won’t exist, it’s magical what they’d expect of it.

http://www.fao.org/docrep/U3550t/u3550t02.htm

Consider that China is actually land-poor, this fits like a glove.

A country’s ability to feed itself very much depends on three factors: availability of arable land, accessible water and population pressures. The more people there are, especially in poor countries with limited amounts of land and water, the fewer resources there are to meet basic needs. If basic needs cannot be met, development stalls and economies begin to unravel. In some poor countries, attempts to increase food production and consumption are undermined by rapid population growth; migration from rural to urban areas; unequal land distribution; shrinking landholdings; deepening rural poverty; and widespread land degradation. Lower birth rates, along with better management of land and water resources, are necessary to avert chronic food shortages.”

Famine. This dude.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Horsemen_of_the_Apocalypse#Black_Horse
https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/the-horsemen-of-revelation/the-horsemen-of-revelation-the-black-horse-of
All these natural disasters are written up as Acts of God.

This is what happens when men run everything, it fails from bureaucracy. You need a blend of influences in society to thrive. They’re too busy competing with one another to provide for the future, nurturing is the female ability.

“By formally recognizing women’s pivotal role, governments will be taking a big step toward safeguarding food production”

They won’t do that, they’re dumb enough to think women are only baby machines and the brain is a coincidence.

At current levels, to support these parasites, the world must somehow pull an additional 70% out of its backside.
https://www.populationinstitute.org/resources/populationonline/issue/1/8/

http://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2083276,00.html
“Population Growth Has Driven Up the Food Price to Alarming Levels”
It opens with Malthus. They know.

I’m not picking on China, they are genuinely that thick. It’s a case study in What Never To Do.

https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a16995

I am by no stretch the first person to note these facts. It’s glaring.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-15/why-we-should-worry-about-china

Recently. That’s just recently.

End.

China is literally taking British food out of the hands of British people.

I’m not making this up. It’s on the official websites. e.g.
http://www.china.doingbusinessguide.co.uk/the-guide/selling-food-to-china/
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/huge-export-win-to-china-for-uk-food-producers
China is in the top 10 markets for our food and drink.
https://www.fdf.org.uk/exports/ukexports.aspx
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exporting-to-china
“growth ensured by Chinese monetary policy” lol
Yes, Communists can be trusted with your money.
https://www.marketingtochina.com/golden-age-british-food-beverage-china/
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/may/20/chinese-middle-class-snap-up-western-goods
https://www.ft.com/content/2166f9ec-b128-11e3-bbd4-00144feab7de
https://themarketmogul.com/chinese-hungry-for-the-british-food-industry/
How many do you NEED?
https://www.globalmeatnews.com/Article/2017/08/14/UK-and-China-sign-200m-pork-export-deal
https://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/841369/Brexit-export-deal-UK-China-food-agreement-British-pork-farming
http://www.cbbc.org/sectors/food-and-drink/

“China will become the world’s largest market for imported foods by 2018, predicts the country’s National Bureau of Statistics of China. China is already the largest grocery market in the world with an estimated value of £1 trillion, according to grocery industry researchers IGD. In 2016 UK food and drink exports to China increased by 49% with particularly strong growth in pork, beer and seafood. As a result China entered the UK’s top 10 food and drink export markets for the first time.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/british-food-exports-will-be-engine-for-growth

Let’s grow by preferentially selling the food our own people need to foreigners with more cash!

Great plan!


Not more valuable cash, more pieces of paper.

Why didn’t this happen to Japan? It’s an island.

Selling to outsiders only from the surplus would be anti-libertarian, anti-globalist.
Wanting to feed our children is racist.

Update:

Just let the white babies starve in the name of Marx. /s

Here’s what is actually going on:

Britain wants to strengthen its industry but needs foreign buyers in the mean time.

The Russians are simply using China to take down America, then pull a Littlefinger and doublecross them. Go to war against them. What are they gonna do? They have no food and no oil to import it with, it would be the easiest victory in military history. Why do you think the EU is helping China? To lessen their dependence on Russia. Russia is post-Communist and sees all the stupid shit China does, yet encourages it? Please. Communist countries like China always need to be rescued by the capitalist ones… who would rescue them? The people who would be calling in debts nobody could afford to pay? And they have well above a billion people, rescue yourself with your superior IQ.

Relevant fact: Soldiers would need even more food. China is doomed.

Update to population point in Automation

So you all see it.

Update: I would like to point out humans shifted in the West to a more K model as soon as infant mortality dropped. This is a fact, it is so overt in nature it proves itself if you only look. It demonstrates itself. The rest of the world (e.g. India) has failed to make this shift to reflect medical changes and that is why the Malthusian trap will hurt them more and others like them (presently by things like a drop in standard of living from overcrowding), since they choose to ignore this selection pressure change. That isn’t our fault, they could copy us, they seem to think they can have their cake and eat it, have too many kids and just cash in on the prosperity from the finite resources as before, a billion mouths and counting. No. For the same reason I can’t buy a cup of coffee then wonder where my money went. If your culture doesn’t adapt, it is culled by the inevitable courses of events. You can’t keep outsourcing your problems, including by blame games. System is broke, fix it.
The shift the Victorians called civilizing or civilization was well-known at the time, they wanted imperialism to expand these benefits.
Common sense is about survival so no, I don’t give a shit what IQ China claims to have, they are stupid by dictionary definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/stupid

They are pursuing a pre-Industrial sexual strategy, producing a billion economic drains like resources are infinite and ignore the mathematical impossibility of it turning out in their favour.
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-feeding-china/

China is the most heavily r-population in the world, they are leeching off the global food supply now to avoid famine. As in, one of the horsemen of the Apocalypse. This includes Europe’s dwindling local production too.

https://www.cnbc.com/2015/10/21/how-hungry-is-china-for-the-worlds-food.html
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.48/full
https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/markets-and-prices/market-briefs/pdf/07_en.pdf
Section 3 China.

“China bumped into the natural limits….” Definition of peak-r.

Screencap for the trust issues

China’s food demand and supply is often cited as one of the driving factors for the increase in world agricultural prices.” Stop blaming Brexit.

Demonstrable fact and the first page of sodding Google, people.
China food crisis, China food shortage, China food supply, China food demand, China food security.

Like I said before, they’ll eat each other.

“Despite its vast size, China is land poor — with only 20 acres of arable land per 100 people — according to the World Bank.” – CNBC

I tried a cheeky search to see how easy this information is to find. I’ll include it on the economic post but
https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2016/december/link-fertility-income
they were right, there is a known connection between the variables.
China undoing its one-child policy will revert its prosperity, it’s inevitable.
The Relationship Between Fertility and National Income
Recent paper 2016
The Relationship between Fertility Rate and Economic Growth in Developing Countries by an Asian.
lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8727479/file/8768892.pdf
“On the one hand, total fertility rate has a negative effect on economic growth in the current period”
The most populous continent/race isn’t Africa/n. It’s Asian.
You must be pretty stupid to be worse off than Africa, after all the shit we put them through. China is trying to put them through more though, classic r-respawn pattern.

The EU know this.
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Fertility_statistics_in_relation_to_economy,_parity,_education_and_migration
“Changes in fertility partially follow changes in the economy, with an average lag of less than two years”
pwned

https://tvhe.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/the-birth-rate-vs-the-growth-rate/

They actually want to expand their pensions in China, that’s how slow they are to adapt.

china is fucked, capital F, a shortlist
https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-china-pensions/china-to-transfer-state-assets-to-pension-fund-in-bid-to-boost-shortfall-idUKKBN1DI06E
“China will begin a pilot program this year to transfer shares in state-owned firms to social security funds in an effort to make up for shortfalls in the nation’s pension scheme, according to a notice published by the cabinet on Saturday.”
https://www.ft.com/content/d4ce82e4-937a-11e5-bd82-c1fb87bef7af
“The whole retirement system must be overhauled” it opens.
They refuse to stop being collectivistic, with huge population density numbers, they will starve themselves to feed old people who refuse to work. The culture is backward, sputtering to a halt as it deserves and also refuses to account for their tortoise-like genetics.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-26/china-s-pension-gap-is-growing-and-nobody-wants-to-talk-about-it
“pension gap is widening” Really?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-labour-retirement-idUSKCN0W1077
Raising the age tiny increments changes nothing and you know it. Some of them expect to retire at fifty. Working for less than half of their life. Fifty.
This type of slothful society doesn’t deserve to survive.
It isn’t pathological altruism, it’s entitlement from the ingroup. Those implode, when resources contract back (what goes up…) to the previous norms, pre-boom.
http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1919654/demographic-time-bomb-chinas-army-young-educated-and-willing
“True, at the surface, China is beginning to grapple with one of the most severe demographic challenges in living memory.” Historically unprecedented demands on the land, emigration/immvasion is required.
Japan has a better balance of consumers (drains) to producers, and their economy is more honest about its debt.
China will be worse off than Japan, it must be.
Problem caused by too many of us? Let’s breed more of us!
A solution only a politician, a sociopathic one, might consider sound.
“But there are two reasons why China’s alleged demographic time bomb will fail to detonate the way pessimists allege.”
No, between your ego and math, you lose.
“And they are increasingly globally minded: nearly 300,000 Chinese now study in the US.”
Globalism has been great for every country that adopted it, of course.
I bet they wanna stay there too, only to vote in more Communism, those BASED Asians too snowflake to hear the mere name of Taiwan.
“But, by itself, the demographic shift will not be the undoing of China’s economic miracle.”
Yeah, getting bitten by a snake isn’t the problem, it’s the venom.
Writer for HSBC lies, no vested interest in there.
So successful they hide data. Con artists need chumps to sell their shtick to.
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2117167/inconvenient-truth-china-omits-key-figures-may-have-highlighted
“The bureau gave no reason why it stopped publishing the data and did not reply to questions from the South China Morning Post.”
“The decline in fertility rates may be more due to the impact of China’s rapidly growing economy, as a similar trend has been observed in places such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.”
Yes, you want to be compared with Japan…
“they may require significant encouragement to have any children at all,” the report said.”
Yeah, their real growth is dead/dying. The Asian Princess culture or Little Emperor Syndrome did them in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_sickness

It’s the worst of all possible worlds.

New Money, ugh.

Video: The Fourth Industrial Revolution

Automation replaces the only labour about 3/5 of the world can do.
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/fun-iq-list/
Russia only cuddles up to China for its industry. Which has the superior culture?
In thousands of years, what have they created? Manufacturing is something a monkey could do better than a human if it weren’t for animal rights groups. When the industries aren’t demanded, what about the insane 20th Century population boom of the farmer regions, able to do nothing else?

They can all vote but less than half can produce net, more than they consume, than the lotus-eaters.

What happens to those people?

When their governments will be unable to provide charitable donation food?

http://www.socialmatter.net/2017/05/19/myth-20th-century-episode-19-malthus-discontents-population-policy/

The problem with AI has many layers.

Surveillance yes, another Master yes, hacking and bugs, humanity.

What about the economies it totally destabilizes?

It would be like an alien announcing themselves, overnight change.

There won’t be any leisure robots. Do we have robot butlers?  The idiots are being sold on their own enslavement using their most predictable head-nodder, the Muh Dick method. We’ll have VR, like a WOW sub, most of the world won’t afford it.

AI that advanced WILL steal your job.

The military will keep the best, always does.

You’ll become a cyborg whether you want to or not.
Biometric ID cards were the first attempt.

Any deaths, like computerized cars, go down as a malfunction.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/20/autos/jeep-recall-anton-yelchin/index.html

If someone’s paying to pimp your life, they want to own YOU.

China won’t ever eclipse America’s post-war success. America didn’t even deserve it because it was spared most bombing. China is too corrupt, too culturally dishonest, to be the standard currency.

Look at the attempts to repair the reputation

https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21699898-fraud-bureaucracy-and-obsession-quantity-over-quality-still-hold-chinese

China already spends lavishly on research and development, and publishes reams of scientific papers. Spending on R&D has more than doubled as a share of the economy since 2000, reaching 2.1% of GDP in 2014, just below the rich-world average, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an inter-governmental think-tank. Meanwhile, GDP itself has trebled. The OECD thus says China will be the world’s largest R&D spender by 2019. In terms of scientific papers published in English, the country is second only to the United States, and its output is rising by 20% a year.

If you’re wondering why so much medicine kills you.

But much of the published work is insubstantial, and a worrying amount is fraudulent. 

Commies. Can’t trust a collectivist.

http://reason.com/blog/2014/07/22/socialists-are-cheaters-says-new-study
Just do the studies and see.

Marxism was more toxic to the East than West, it plugs into racial differences.
This can never be changed.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/jan/31/socialists-conservatives-born-not-made
Allows the corrupt to float fake money.

But as President Xi admitted to the assembled academicians this week, science and technology remains “a bottleneck” for economic growth in China. The biggest problems are fraud and the academies of science and engineering themselves.

In 2014 China’s anti-corruption watchdog said it had “uncovered fraud in research grants managed by China’s Ministry of Science and Technology”. In April the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology retracted an article by scientists from Dalian University, in Liaoning province, because it suspected the peer-review process had been subverted. In 2015 BioMed Central retracted more than 40 papers submitted by Chinese researchers.

The prevalence of fraud reflects poor oversight and a dodgy research culture.

But sure, I’m imagining it.
Why do we need honest science?

Meds that aren’t poison?

Gold that contains gold?

https://coinweek.com/world-coins/canadian-coins/avoid-becoming-victim-fake-gold-coin/

More commonly counterfeited gold coins are Chinese gold pandas, $20 Liberty Head gold coins and St. Gaudens gold coins.

Oversight…