We used to hang people for this

While obviously I do mean the paedophile, I also mean the entire family. Know a tree by its fruit. The signs must’ve been there and they knew what they let into that house. Did he like anime? Did he have an Asian ‘girlfriend’ at some point? Did he start trying to change the definition and follow some naturalistic fallacy that any woman who bleeds is fair ‘game’? The signs were there. At no point do the parents blame themselves, despite this ‘man’ living at home. Under their care. What would this be called? An honour-killing of some description, wouldn’t it?
One of the few cases where abortion is not only moral, it is vital.
Followed with the sterilization of all parties involved.

Bestiality brothels shouldn’t surprise you

PETA is suspiciously silent.

http://daily.bhaskar.com/news/WOR-animal-brothels-a-lifestyle-in-denmark-shocking-cases-of-animals-being-brutally–4452570-PHO.html

“Lifestyle choice” now where have we heard that before?
R-types = animal rapists and violent abusers.
Germany = animal porn illegal, rape of animals legal.

I happen to know from a paraphilia researcher that Germany has had bestiality brothels for a long, long time. It used to be known for that in Europe, over places like Amsterdam. S&M and bestiality. That was its USP. It had laws that didn’t expressly forbid them because it was a great way to blackmail foreign diplomats. Picture Hitler crying.
Danes have something similar but who cares about Denmark? Danes with Great Danes, sick bastards.
This is what happens when sexual entitlement meets weak consent laws.
They also use heavily pregnant women to test the pedophilia laws, since they’re technically having sex involving a child.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/prostitution-pregnancy-pornography-exploitation-consent-a7697536.html

Instead of blaming prostitution (and fornication), they blame capitalism. There’s nothing more objectifying or dehumanizing for the species than hookers and sex robot slaves. Is that the best use of humans or robots?

The women-are-property meme is not only un-Biblical (violates the vows about honouring and cherishing), it’s part of the degenerate spiral to paedophilia because if women are property and cannot say NO (withhold consent, the assumption) then neither can little girls.

OT How long before vore becomes an accepted fetish among African cannibals?
The ultimate way to deal with this is to spread out pamphlets from the Koran that forbid premarital or extramarital ‘fun’.
They can’t possibly dispute with this, without insulting their own religion. It becomes No True Muslim.

Nobody chooses the niqab, ‘to submit’, the meaning of Islam’s name. Similarly, no sane woman chooses to become a hooker. It’s exploitation on par with trafficking, which is sex slavery that uses prostitution as its cover.
Nobody owns an unmarried woman’s body, the only sexual right is the conjugal and the religious canon in Christianity clearly states that the spouses own one another’s bodies. Atheists lie, thinking if they can’t control one woman, a whole flock couldn’t possibly refuse to submit…. A+ logic. Having one nagging wife is Hell, imagine a herd.

A white woman’s body isn’t a public squeezy toy and even a dog understands ‘No’, unlike these IQ85 degenerate scumbags.

Video: Muslim in Canada defends pedophilia

http://www.facebook.com/AnsweringChristHaters/videos/1210222092433197/

They’re getting so bold, aren’t they?

I think the only sensible reply to this is Deus Vult.

“Silence is consent.”

The feminists say nothing.

This completely contradicts the notion of consent, which is a positive construct that must be actively given, in all law, so I would question the translation of that word. It must mean something else, Islam knows no such thing as consent. There is only its meaning, ‘submission’. Submission is never consensual, it is coerced. Coercion is like blackmail in another signed (non-marital) contract, it vitiates consent, it becomes invalid. One must be free to consent.

Lying about the conjoined medical phenomena of menstruation and puberty is another strike against reason.

This entire sham of a religion is merely an excuse for war. No other religion is warmongering. It is totally incompatible with the West and its culture and people.

Trump in Epstein’s Black Book

It went down the memory hole but recent cuckey events have made me ponder.

The PDF is on Gawker, of all places.
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/trump-and-pedophilia-epstein-black-book/
Still yet to hear a convincing explanation for this.
A black book is a filter of the most important contacts.
I’d follow up on the actors, personally. The weakest links. Any scandals or hush-ups involving them.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1145556/pg1
I’m not going to say which one sticks out. Based on the thesp rumour mill.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2780681/pg2
“It also depends if there was a ‘contact book’ and a 2nd ‘black book’.”
Very important, omitted information.
“Almost every big name libtard is on that list.”
A fluke, I’m sure.
I did hear the one I’m thinking of, among other embarassing tales, did gay porn at one point.
Not one you’d instantly suspect either. That’s why he hates the internet. The real reason. Probably terrified it’ll come out some day. A thing with Jolie did.
This particular list is deliberate, it’s a dox of something for sure.
“Everyone on that list that is someone very important, and knows they cannot be touched and don’t care”
“Some replies were sceptical that this client list was a general overall list of Epstein’s clients. Wrong, this particular list is specific to his seemingly pedophile clients and the butler who found this client list mysteriously died after this disclosure. Epstein was a billionaire and surely kept separate unique categorical black book lists according to the relationship with his clients ie investments etc. The butler attempted to sell this particular list and I believe was killed as a result by this exposure.”

Cross-reference children’s charities, the NGOs are smothered in child rape scandals.

Any celebrity should be desperate to clear their name.

Tactical voting this election for non-cucks


Credit: Relatively Stable British Memes

And then there’s this one.

And the honest v.

I wonder if they’re going to get it.

Given the backfire effect, probably not.

It’s like the Remoaners after Brexit.

Denial of reality, classic r.

I’m busy running around for this GE which surprised me so, so much, like I did Brexit last year.

My prediction? The WWC want Brexit and they’re angry. They voted for it and the supposed conservatives (cucks) aren’t delivering. The working class won’t vote Labour after Rotherham, the traitors have lost two, three generations easily and the old 20th century WWC loyalty goes along with it.
Miliband’s out of touch comments about Islamophobia really sealed it, however socialist Corbyn tries to virtue signal, it’s obvious he doesn’t care about workers from this country and the London mayor isn’t even British. Meanwhile, Trump cuddles up to Merkel over May and nobody says anything. Surrounded by deceivers.

Third party protest votes will be the way to go, and post-Brexit, there’s one obvious candidate.

A coalition is a distinct possibility, but it eats into Labour so for now the Tories won’t care.

Video: Interview with a sex slave

Notice some themes. Pedophiles breeding children for these purposes. Involving the elite, to control them. Slavery and torture. Still referred to like prostitution (part of the reason it should be illegal, no excuse for these ‘owners’). She calls it ‘having sex’ when no consent was given i.e. rape. Typical of these cases.

They keep politely calling it trafficking – no. It’s slavery.

I’d be interesting to know how many of these slaves are white and how these evil people network.

‘Member that time Richard Dawkins defended pedophiles?

http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm/

Yeah, I ‘member!

remember this when we're beyond all hope

I heard a rumour, which I am loathe to openly repeat so story time.

A long long time ago in a land far far away in Cambridge or maybe it was Oxford, a little boy called Dick was touched by a priest and vowed to destroy the Catholic Church, hating god ever after. The End. P.s. it made him a bit of a pedophile but like, only on weekends. Like demonic possession (h/t Vox Day for that metaphor) the urge never leaves them, regardless of whether they act on it.

Is the Left’s push of Sexual Revolution narratives a ploy to destroy age of consent?

All this Milo nonsense is raising questions.

Namely, why are they suddenly in shutdown, denial mode?

Was something, some legal challenge, brewing in the next victim group, rising?

When the likes of Salon did those pro-pedophilia articles?

reminder

http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/the-sexual-revolution-and-children-how-the-left-took-things-too-far-a-702679.html

I won’t go into detail on this … thing.

Monsters.

take it from M Greyland

Now for all well-meaning people who believe I am extrapolating from my experience to the wider gay community, I would like to explain why I believe this is so: From my experience in the gay community, the values in that community are very different: the assumption is that EVERYONE is gay and closeted, and early sexual experience will prevent gay children from being closeted, and that will make everyone happy.

everyone is damaged
useful excuse to an abuser
there is no rape
useful excuse for rapists

If you doubt me, research “age of consent” “Twinks,” “ageism” and the writings of the NUMEROUS authors on the Left who believe that early sexuality is somehow “beneficial” for children.