Scared of the word “vagina”

MISOGYNISTS

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/08/healthline-website-says-the-term-vagina-is-not-gender-inclusice-will-start-using-front-hole-instead/

When various politicians avoided the word in a reproductive debate, that’s what they were called.

Men don’t get to define womanhood. “Front hole” is the cake hole, obviously.

They hate women because it’s competition for straight men. Really. They only pretend to be female to rape men. It’s the sneaky fucker strategy.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/book-the-man-who-would-be-queen-transgender-psychology/

Literally their thought process.

“Will I be more successful getting straight men as a woman than I am at getting gay men as a man?” (The last decision has to be weighted by a particular transsexual’s degree of preference for straight versus gay men. Most vastly prefer straight men.)” Rapists.

Disgusting rapists.

Straight men don’t want them. NO MEANS NO.

Legal recognition as a “woman” is about coercion and rape, so men can’t object. I won’t stand for it.

They do everything they can to oppress women (we can’t say vagina, really eunuch?) and if they had their way, they’d just kill us all as sexual competition, it’s insanity. You’ll see.

The violence is the reason they want to be “women”, actually female-passing, they think, sociopathically, it’ll be easier to get away with legally. They’re testing the woman-bashing theories of MRA’s perverse interpretation of gynocentrism and every time, it fails.

e.g. expect to see more of this, tranny rage. Testing the law.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/08/04/jury-rejects-transgenders-claim-that-transition-medication-caused-him-to-try-to-kill-3-people-with-an-axe-660657

When they aren’t above the law, cue crocodile tears and the incredible sulk.
They aren’t in another state or anything, they’re actually aroused by the thought of violence. They’re more present.
Medically, reducing your testosterone levels would make you less violent (there are studies), so you’re doubly responsible 1. for doing it, nutjob and 2. for blaming women’s hormones (sexist) and lying in court (perjury).

Remember Ed Gein.

Cross-dressing is a trait of serial killers and has been studied as a top fetish in prison populations.
They get angry (and the threats are all translated “you wouldn’t like me when I’m angry”) because when you spot a predator (mask drop), it attacks! [This is what real women put up with, with creepy straights. Exactly this, the intimidation, coercion and “the creeps” survival instinct.] They’ll also target young (underage) men/boys because, like most sexual predators, they take advantage of the benefit of the doubt (trust), how society enables them with myths and social inexperience. Men must discuss how to avoid predators themselves, the time is now. Learn about freeze responses and ways to escape such a situation. There’s widespread grooming of adults and minors to accept the behaviour as “good” and “fun” whatever their personal objection (conscience).

Intimidation – you aren’t allowed to find me sexually repulsive gaslighting (I’ve written before that if you aren’t allowed to be sexually repulsed, you aren’t free).

Coercion – scared you might like it? It doesn’t count as gay…

I mentioned a study I could scrape up before.

You aren’t allowed to study these anymore.

Paraphilias deserve no legal protected status, look at these!

But gay penguins adopt!

Why do you think this makes homosexuals look less like predators?

If you look them up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad%C3%A9lie_penguin#Reproduction

Young Adélie penguins which have no experience in social interaction may react to false cues when the penguins gather to breed. They may, for instance, attempt to mate with other males, with young chicks, or with dead females.

On account of the birds’ relatively human-like appearance and behavior, human observers have interpreted this behavior anthropomorphically as sexual deviance. The first to record such behavior was Dr Levick, in 1911 and 1912, but his notes were deemed too indecent for publication at the time; they were rediscovered and published in 2012.[17][n 1] “The pamphlet, declined for publication with the official Scott expedition reports, commented on the frequency of sexual activity, auto-erotic behaviour, and seemingly aberrant behaviour of young unpaired males and females, including necrophilia, sexual coercion, sexual and physical abuse of chicks and homosexual behaviour,” states the analysis written by Douglas Russell and colleagues William Sladen and David Ainley. “His observations were, however, accurate, valid and, with the benefit of hindsight, deserving of publication.”

They blame global warming.

It makes frogs gay too?

unpaired = r-selected

Reminder: compulsive masturbation is a paraphilia-related disorder.

(keyword: auto-erotic)

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00926239908404008

The subgroup of males with both PAs and lifetime PRDs (n = 123) self-reported the greatest number of lifetime SIDs, the highest incidence of physical and sexual abuse, the fewest years of completed education, and the highest likelihood of current unemployment or disability.

Oh look, a male promiscuity study – the promiscuous are losers!

no experience in social interaction” – in humans, that is abuse experience
a strangely common prevalence in homosexual adult males

Why not test IQ too?
Impulse control is tied to it.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-012-9900-3

Why is this relevant?

Well, pedophilia has already been claimed as NOT a paraphilia.

Like homosexuality before it. I guess it’s just a coincidence most pedophiles are homosexually-oriented men.

The present article examined the question instead by comparing the major correlates and other features of homosexuality and of the paraphilias, including prevalence, sex ratio, onset and course, fraternal birth order, physical height, handedness, IQ and cognitive neuropsychological profile, and neuroanatomy.

You could just study it directly.

e.g.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3769077/

Various ‘preferences’ and sexual interests have fallen in and out of being defined as paraphilic, for example, up until 1973 homosexuality was classified as paraphilic under the DSM (diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders)-II. Its subsequent removal led to some arguing that if homosexual orientation is not in itself abnormal, then the inclusion of other sexual behaviors classified as paraphilic cannot be justified as a concept and should be removed entirely from future editions

Paraphilia essentially means anti-Darwin, that was the purpose of the concept.

http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-03599-001

 Besides homosexuality, the DSM also listed sadism, masochism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, pedophilia, and fetishes as mental disorders.

Yah.

Members of the activist committee believed that the law and psychiatric diagnosis were and should be independent.

Nay.

Our hope was that one day the entire group of sexual disorders would be dropped from DSM, at least those currently listed as the paraphilias.

Thanks, Silverstein!

I’m resting my case gently so you can do your own research.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynophobia

BDSM changes your brain

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/hooked_up_and_tied_down_the_neurological_consequences_of_sadomasochism

….In The Brain That Changes Itself, psychiatrist Norman Doidge summarizes research on the neurobiological aspects of sexual development. He writes: “The human libido is not a hardwired, invariable biological urge but can be curiously fickle, easily altered by our psychology and the history of our sexual encounters,” and he goes on to conclude: “Sexual taste is obviously influenced by culture and experience and is often acquired and then wired into the brain.”

Examples of cultural pushes into fetish/unnatural sex: spanking from public schoolboys in the 19th century, oral during the 50/60s with the pressure to perform for a boyfriend before marriage, and most harmful of the three from an STD perspective, nature’s petri dish anal ‘sex’ since the 90s promotion of the ‘gay lifestyle’.

With BDSM, the story of the brain gets even more complicated. Here, a person is not just forming neural networks or brain maps in the areas of the brain responsible for sexual interest, sexual arousal, sexual climax, and so on. With BDSM, a person is fusing distinct neural networks that were meant to operate separately…..

I am awed and cowed by sublime perfection.

Whenever a feminist tries the “don’t knock it until you’ve tried it” lie/line of “pushing boundaries”, “exploring oneself” and “there are no limits, it’s harmless”, bear this type of research in mind. You know, science. Medicine.

Human beings have neural networks related to sexual behavior, and these are shaped in subtle ways by our sexual experiences. We have separate neural networks related to anger and aggression, and these are shaped and strengthened when people engage in violent or domineering behaviors. We have still more separate brain maps for fear and anxiety, which are shaped and reinforced by frightening or anxiety-provoking experiences.

If you think about these three emotional experiences—sexual arousal, aggression, and fear—they are typically quite distinct emotional experiences. There is some overlap between them in terms of physical or bodily response: all three, for example, involve increases in heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure, because all three involve activation of the sympathetic nervous system. And yet, for most healthy individuals, sexual arousal, aggression, and fear remain distinct emotional, cognitive, and physical experiences. This is, I will suggest, a good and healthy thing.

You shouldn’t need a further high from Nature’s own ultimate high.

So these neural networks and these experiences normally remain distinct—unless our experiences begin to fuse them together. When this fusion happens, the brain gets confused…