Cities as leeches

True.

Very true.

http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/16752-2/

Per person, their productivity is likely negative.

I don’t understand how social housing is even available for the cities, when it’s a luxury to move there.

The Chinese do deliberately rip off exports on quality though. The same goods are made better for Chinese consumption, like steel quality. That might sound minor, unless there’s a war on.

The problem with the cities is twofold: one, it attracts the hardworking because jobs are scarce. This has been true since the Industrial Revolution. Secondly, there is too much entertainment. Too many bread and circuses. You shut down the cinema, the theatres, the comedy stages, the football fields, and suddenly the misery of living in such close proximity to people who hate you would be insufferable.

London is the worst for it. You can come to London but you can never leave.

Dopamine fiends, all of us.

We grow luvvies and other wastes of space who think they did something.
Attention is like air to a blow-up doll to these people.
The arts are the worst for ego-stroking. It’s all so fake. Everything is amazing and mind-blowing and great.

Really? Your burger is great?
On the level of Alexander?!

They’re just trying to justify the debt expense.

Take ’em down, someone please, take them down the dozens of pegs where they learn their skills actually settle.
They and their lifestyle wouldn’t be possible without illegal slave labour. God forbid they watch their own child or drive them to school or clean their own toilets.

The greatest thing I ever read about the Roman Empire is that they reviled actors. Openly. They’d mock them in the streets. About as far away from the respect of a philosopher, to dole out political advice. They were known to be brats and degenerates and socially excluded as such. They are literally professional liars.

Here, we give them Knighthoods.

I await the grim spectre of fiscal death.

Overprotective parents cause Peter Pan Syndrome

They wouldn’t dare put a real pathology in the DSM V.

The parents might not be able to blame their children. They might stop paying their shrink bills. Quelle horreur. 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070501112023.htm

Peter Pans – almost always male.

When sexually mature, promiscuous and critically, definitively incapable of commitment (seeing it as tantamount to prison, do not expect logic, but preposterous metaphors from them). As you can expect, problems with pair bonding, even purely social connections with other men. Therefore, they tend to befriend one another. Mature and successful men avoid them but they rationalize this as a virtue and brag about it.

They regress frequently to various stages of childhood, notably when stressed in an argument (especially one they started, quite the bully to relieve their random anxiety). They tend to violence and physical aggression, but not when a parental-like figure e.g. police, boss, or other authority e.g. club bouncer is present. They laugh at the law until before a judge for their ignorance/recklessness/cruelty, when they play victim. Remember, sorry is the magic word and you can break any law as long as you pretend you’re sorry after…

The male (at least 9/10, he is male, it is a male condition based on physical aspects of denial, as they cannot menstruate, that brings women to speedier emotional maturity as it’s hard to deny*) is easy to spot because they act like a teenager into their twenties, hold similar expectations for themselves and their life into their thirties and, humiliatingly for their relations, beyond. As other men begin to accrue success in their 20s/30s, they’re still stuck doing the same nonsense as their school years. They blame society for this, they are always blameless because they are always duty-free, the Real Victim Here (TM). There is no midlife crisis because in their mind they are still fifteen. They are simply immature. The world is forever their oyster. In myth we find nothing like this, the young gods have to die to get anywhere. Or else otherwise grow up and renew into adulthood. The ancients would’ve cut them off and forced them into real employment. Nowadays they whine on blogs about the many ways The Man has wronged them and start up pretentious forums blaming literally anyone else for their personal life. Conspiracies are popular. It alleviates some of their deep-seated guilt. They sometimes try to pull rank where it is least appropriate, with the green rudeness of a child e.g. correcting a Christian on the Bible as an atheist, lecturing women on babymaking and so on. They attempt to appear as if they have moral authority and we find many con artists and fraudsters in their ranks. It would be fine if they kept to their own but so ensured of their own superiority and legal invincibility, they see the world as both inferior and a mark, with goods they earned but didn’t deserve as much as him, because he has real feelings, unlike everyone else. Real feelings and excessive volumes of them, as well as poor control of himself in general, make him worthy of pity. Everyone is out to get them, as they are out to get everyone. Paranoia (vague, unfalsifiable) is aggression projection.

They see any societal obligation as a trick, a prison. However, to everyone else, they are a Fool, with none of the luck, thinking society will hold them to special, zero standards (yes, narcissism) and to think they are being put upon, asked something in excess of average. Is it any surprise their father abandoned such a case? Emotionally or physically? At a certain point they do become completely insufferable and cannot be helped by anyone but a professional. Do they seek a professional? Never. That would be a responsible thing to do. Instead they’d rather waste their life and suffer, and cause others to suffer around them as well. They’re the first to tell you how nice and great they are, like a child at a reunion begging for attention.

They project their own flaws onto women. Much like serial killers, they have a dependent relationship with their mother. All other women are whores, or something to be used. You see, the world is their playground. We are all toys (Machiavellianism with none of the wit).

They see ‘feminine’ virtues as weakness e.g. compromise, popularity, empathy, fortitude, all these for ‘suckers’. By making it female-exclusive, they can never be accused of them, in their twisted mind. If you remind them of Jung’s balance, they get offended.

The hard thing is never necessary, and they would argue, seldom the right thing either. This is awfully convenient for them. 

It isn’t women that terrify them but the burden of fatherhood. If they happen to cause a pregnancy, they’ll blame the woman. You see, in their minds, they do not believe they are fertile, because what child can have children? They are deluded, at times possibly psychotic e.g. accusing a woman they consented to have sex with of rape, because she fell pregnant. They often make excuses to abandon the woman and that’s how deadbeats are made. The more psychopathic ones will torment their new family out of resentment for curtailing ‘his’ freedom (belonging to and only due to him, as the only Real Human) and slowly push them away, often with male-seeming outlets e.g. strip clubs, porn addiction, affairs, also cutting off financial support (this being the one objective form of abandonment that cannot be concealed, either they pay or not). Still, they are a veritable cornucopia of excuses when pulled up on this objective fact, like a child who ‘forgot’ his homework. Physical or other abuses of the mother are also common, since her body shackles him to his spawn, intellectually, and he probably identifies with a male child too much to hurt it (narcissism). They are the type to murder their children to ‘get back at’ the mother and then kill themselves in faux grief to avoid Patriarchal legal punishment or to simply beat/punish the female children for reminding him of their mother. Usually, child abusers start on the little girls, for various reasons (access, sociability, gaslighting, guilt-tripping, lower odds of revenge or being believed, acting out/up accusations, ‘straight’ sex, and so forth) if they can.

A good Patriarchal society whipped this scum out of town at the first sign and let him starve. They knew better than to think it could be fixed by kindness, such people are a cancer. Their enemy is the Patriarch, the Father they came to hate, although they are liars. They often call for a Patriarchal system, believing it will increase their power as a male, extending it to all males, rather than installing it to families, including mothers. The childless receive no benefit from a family-oriented system but he is quite stupid. The urge to control others is as strong as their urge to be ‘free’, with their perverse definitions of all taking and no giving, no duties, no responsibilities, to travel and use people like disposable objects, only to be revered in old age as if hedonism or owning genitalia is an accomplishment. They seem to believe too, that speaking out cheaply for the cause of Patriarchs now will prevent them from being treated as they justly deserve if that system came about e.g. they wouldn’t be kicked out of society away from the nubile daughters and rich drinking buddies.

Nowadays they keep secret social media accounts or avoid them altogether, terrified of the parental figures of society, like employers, from knowing what they are and denying them opportunities.  You see, they can abandon you, but you cannot abandon them. You must give them everything because they deserve it. They probably have a list.

Do not pity them, they want you to nurture them like a mother figure so they might use you, as a parasite.

Good news?

They die alone, having no true friends. They are forever lonely because they cannot connect with themselves and refuse to grow (modern parlance: sell out). They are stuck but aging. If they have children, they are loathed for their ultimate failing, in secret or openly. Strangely, they balk at open accusations of how they behave, wishing to rebel Them Vs The World, while openly admitting their actions/beliefs when it is socially desirable (compulsive deception, stemming from no true identity, possible borderline feature). For example, they will claim to be monogamous but also claim monogamy is impossible or over-rated (cognitive dissonance doesn’t affect children as they are incapable of logic, these men are retarded in many ways) to make themselves seem more appealing in other men’s estimations and gain their favours (this is also wrong, and hardly ever works, but they are too dense to see it). They cannot connect with women, because they are not truly men. They do not deserve the title, instead accurately, they are adult male. Women are an alien creature to the man-child. They do not like (read: temper tantrums/mantrums) being reminded of their age or its consequences, they project their ignorance (or innocence) onto the object, and call women crazy/stupid/wrong etc. Here we find a glib misogynist (you cannot hate something you do not understand) that dismisses anything he doesn’t understand or that goes against his preconceived beliefs as <relates to women speciously, therefore I may ignore it>, this neurosis enables his lifestyle. Escapism and emotion (that they inaccurately dub masculine for egocentrism) are their sole purpose in life, these combined they call experience. A postmodern monster. The fuckboy is also a Peter Pan with a focus on the psychopathic sexual aggressions (people merely as soil to stake a flag in, porn as real). Modern society enables these people e.g. the parasite single of the Japanese male. The Western equivalent either mocks them, projecting by geography, or idolizes them (Japanophiles and some very creepy sexual attractions you must take seriously).

Quite the pearl-clutchers, they are easily offended. It’s always your fault.

I don’t blame the parents, when the child is an adult.

*I’ve seen a handful of female variants, but they were very masculine, presenting like the male case, hating themselves, and they were always on the Pill, usually from their teens. They deny fertility as a responsibility or any other aspect of physical and sexual health. Never want children, love abortion. Refuse to get sterilized, because that’s a limit and infertility is associated with age.

Why does the manosphere think it has the moral high ground?

It doesn’t. At all. In fact, it’s actually worse than feminism in some respects because they know full well how wrong what they encourage and do really is, they see the damage to society and keep doing it because other people are (begging if they jumped off a cliff…). They seem to be dallying with the Alt Right since this EU crisis (whatever) and some dipping their toe into Neoreaction (fine) ideas and acting shocked and pearl-clutching like the worst SJWs when these traditional people reject them. Like, actually traditional, as in living it. Or in politer circles, when they ignore them, hoping they’ll go away.

They don’t get it.
They don’t have the moral high ground.

I have a mixed readership so allow me to explain a bit.

Off the top of my head, like Feminist vs. PUA … let’s consider the so-called ‘degenerate’ behaviours they verbally lambaste when (feminist) women do it while hypocritically enacting them or endorsing them in their common conversations with others who are/will do them aka incitement. (Looks misogynist to an outsider because it is, in some cases, like how dare a single woman support herself with a job – when the alternative is welfare).
I’ve gone for the practical, somewhat PC term destructive because it’s easier to agree upon.

fuckingdegenerates

None of those people with the spare time to push these Zeitgeist online have a real job or an actual life. Their Apocalypse Value is zero. They deserve zero respect. AKA r-types gonna r.

And they wonder why the traditional people are giving them the side-eye.

Really?

She sLAYS them

It comes from a puerile understanding of masculinity, including the laughable attempt to ape Neoreaction’s success with ‘Neomasculinity’, where r-types pretend to reform and play both sides (I guess you could say, game both sides) by talking about K-ideas, what an effort... and bitch “Why won’t women (who aren’t married to me and owe me nothing) submit to me?” when they’ve done literally nothing to prepare for that role and on the contrary, much to disqualify them from the MMP.
As if anyone in their Right mind (pun wholly intended) is going to take pointers on how to be a man from Roosh. Do you want his life? Is it aspirational for traditionalists up until now? What’s your gut telling you? A person’s past and choices can’t lie for them.

Their troubles seem to come from a very convenient excuse to avoid maturity.

Men aren’t exempt from prosocial behaviour, far from it, they’re supposed to be more virtuous to lead women and establish societal standards.

p.s. I see the spelling error and I don’t care.

Why I think the MRA/Angry MGTOW bitches will ultimately fail

Spectacularly. 

dis gonna be good anticipation pull up a chair listen watch

I’ve been asked this and it’s a fair question, this’ll be the one time I address the topic so I can leave it alone. To fail. On its own. Some joke about the entropy of sexual frustration.

What unites the two groups?

Condition 1:

“society is unfair!”

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing

Life is unfair but go on.
Condition 2.  As I put it earlier:

wah wah wah Matriarchy is keeping me down”

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

Passive and unmanly but I’ll roll with that as premise.
The writing will be clunky, probably.

Why does modern society hate men?
Men fight the Government.

Think on that for a bit and come back.

Men don’t ask for things like women. Men overthrow, men topple, men destroy and war. They don’t need you for war anymore. What do they need you for, that they can’t get elsewhere?
If you are not willing to do those things, give your life to a cause, you are not a man and what you are defending is a luxury of the First World rather than a right. If you can live without it, it isn’t a right.
This is the point where they get anecdotal and apply injustice/victim mentality to areas of life that do not and will never apply to them e.g. the old canard, marriage is evil but I’m never getting married or women are dumb bitches I don’t need them why don’t they like me or my personal favourite I don’t need children where is my pension. 

Quick test: do they read the Victim Bible called The Guardian? If so, Pass Go and fuck yourself.

Let’s take the feminist metaphor that they want to use, to make the Government fuck men over further, but these guys keep agreeing with for suicidally stupid reasons: the Gender War. Let’s buy into their frame further.
Life isn’t a movie, it doesn’t matter which side is ‘right’, it is made by who has the biggest bastard on their team.
In this case, the Government. Who literally hold all the cards, and write all the laws, and hold all the guns (UK edition).

My sentiment on the tide against PC.

So what are you gonna do?
What can you do?
Sweet FA.

Government will crush the bitchy MGTOW and MRA agenda.
The equality paradigm (that isn’t fair! that’s discrimination bc I’m a man!) requires victims. The physically stronger sex cannot take a dive and fake an injury, this isn’t football. It doesn’t work. It will never work, whining delta, gamma and omega males cannot speak for their stronger counterparts, as feminists cannot speak for normal women. It’s called History. History is the proof men are not the weaker sex. Yet they keep going. At this point it’s embarrassing.

This isn’t all good for women and many women do not support the actions of Government, as many men don’t either (one of the issues with democracy, check out neoreaction some time folks).

The women who do (feminists) make a grievous error.
Women think Government will protect them. When things happen, SHTF, which do they need?
The sociopathic pen-pushers or men, in the street?
Yet they stab their guardians in the back and with crimson hands say “what happened?”. You became a concubine for the system. You are the whore for Babylon. That’s what happened. No wonder the men are doubtful. Distrustful. Some are just as bad though, and deserve no moral high horse, they deserve an ass. They don’t object to female parasitism, as long as they get a good, long suck off the State teat too. So it isn’t about sex. Sex doesn’t divide us. It’s about politics, it’s r/K. The fake MGTOW are the r-selected and want the world to improve around them, the real are K and want to improve themselves.
They want all the goodies too, to be ‘equal’ with feminists, with none of the responsibility too. Like feminists. They want a wife, all the cooking, sex, affection, kids but with none of the obligation, so they get a free hooker and call her a girlfriend. The girlfriend isn’t really giving it up for free, but he keeps up the pretense that it might get serious. To keep her, he must deceive her. He is the male equivalent of the feminist monster, who marries you to divorce you.

For the free hooker label;

What’s the point of a hooker? You enjoy their company. You leave when that stops.
What’s the point of a bf/gf, again?…

It used to be husband/wife auditions, there was a set timing to it, for courting. Now it’s a way for a man to claim a woman, like he owns her legally (wife), use up the best years of her life (youth) and ward other men off…. without commitment. Without any responsibility on his side.
And they complain about the societal decay, the fallout from this. Sure, there are many women on welfare, but how many of the fathers wanted to marry the mother of their children and financially support them? Are we all adults here? Do men deserve some moral exemption from a problem caused by two?
And you hear all these stories like “my gf cheated on me boo hoo” and it’s like, there’s no such thing. There are two relationship statuses: single or married. This is why men ‘cheat’ on their gf. They know this. What is the duty of a bf/gf? What? The idea is almost laughable.
There is no commitment that is not codified in law. She owed you nothing because you gave her nothing.

Counterexample: Same way a gf isn’t entitled to a proposal after X years. Or your money.

And which sex allowed it to become this way? Which sex allowed Patriarchy to decay and crumble?
Men. Men have only other men to blame.

Most of it, is that they wanted free sex. The primary motivation for men. Except nothing in life is free. So they had to give women excess power in exchange. If men wanted to reinstall a Patriarchy, all they would need to do is swear off sex with women. Then what? What can they do? What can they dangle as incentive, like training a dog? We all know they’ve got nothing, as a whore’s only value is sex. The MRA/angry MGTOW group are fighting against other men, sociopathic men running the system (and still blaming women somehow, which does make them misogynists). Do you think the sociopaths of the system really care what’s fair? What do you have to offer? You don’t have a pussy to whore out. You don’t have money. The tax system already took it. You’re already screwed.

Surprise! The Sisterhood lied to you to try and steal your prospects for themselves.

But go ahead, keep bitching about it. Like a girl. It makes you look really competent and adult.

Our elders are criticizing us because we see past their BS.

The rest of us are watching you and it’s quite funny. We lost sympathy when you started being stupid.
When it collapses, you’ll blame everybody but yourselves. That’s why it will fail.

Mouse Utopia, Social Decay and Cultural Collapse

link here

I wish they did more articles like this.

“Calhoun and his researchers found that in a space-limited/resource unlimited environment, the population of mice would explode; peak-out and then collapse to extinction. This test was replicated several times and it was found that these led to the same outcome each time. The reason for this phenomenon was found to derived from social decay which worsened with each generation. The social decay led to unrest in the environment, which in turn led to sub replacement fertility. It was concluded that nature has a limit in which social animals can interact.”

The UK population rate is paltry and far beneath replacement level, propped up by parasitic immigrants (there is no N cap on child benefit). Feminism is literally a societal suicide note. Death is the great equalizer.

Here’s the experiment referenced.