Pathogenic cancer DNA change proven

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180627160355.htm
Study STDs. Dare ya.

“The research, published in the journal eLife, shows that the human leukemia virus (HTLV-1) acts at a large number of sites across the human genome, disrupting the regulation of tens of thousands of genes.”

One virus.

One strain, of one virus.

“HTLV-1 is thought to infect more than 10 million people around the world. The virus can be transmitted through unprotected sex, blood transfusions, and from mother to baby via breast milk.”
Harmless fun. Fuck a Thai girl, kill your baby. Who are you to judge? They aren’t hurting anyone. What the wife doesn’t know, won’t hurt her. – Satan

“They add that the findings provide new insight into how viruses like HTLV-1 can alter the structure of the human genome, which can result in diseases such as cancer.”

The wages of sin.

When will it be taught in Sex Ed?

Never ever ever ever.

Anal sex linked to anal cancer, says Captain Obvious

http://www.medicaldaily.com/does-anal-sex-lead-anal-cancer-3-facts-and-myths-400561

Close to 90 percent of anal cancer cases can be traced back to HPV. But the cancer itself is relatively rare.

Not the point. You shouldn’t have STDs in your arse.
That’s the point.

If only we had a book of some kind, teaching people these basic facts of life.

What to do, sure, but more importantly and practically, what not to do…

Yeah, that’ll do.

Honestly, the worst lie atheists peddle is that the rules of reality are arbitrary.
Things are called bad for a reason – because they ARE bad for you. Personally.
Morality is based on the individual and their dumb-arse choices.

Couldn’t resist.

It’s gay sex. Doesn’t matter if you’re doing it with a woman, if you’re not doing it with the woman parts of the woman. Gay sex habits, gay sexual statistics. Because we know that bell curve ends well.

“And though cases have been slowly increasing in recent decades, only one of every 500 people will develop anal cancer in their lifetime, generally between the ages of 55 to 64 — a stark contrast to the one in every 22 people who will develop colorectal cancer.”

  1. Not correcting for sexual ‘lifestyle’. Not an argument.
  2. As if microbes cannot migrate. Through the same system. With zero boundaries. The area of the tract is vastly larger than the opening. Accounting for physical size.

See note.

“Similarly, the greater number of sexual partners, the greater the risk of cancer.”

I keep seeing the manosphere complain about prostate cancer but deny… this bit.

http://www.livescience.com/45743-sti-std-trichomoniasis-trich-prostate-cancer.html
How did it get there? Magic?

You can only shut out reality for so long. Before it comes knocking on your backdoor.

You notice how so few of these sex-positive people are willing to talk about medical facts, from HBD to STD immunity?

Prostate cancer is under-funded, therefore women are wrong.

Prostate cancer is bad, therefore breast cancer is funny.

Prostate because man. Manly man macho man. Listen to Mr Man. Anal fun.

Note: This pathogenic cancer aetiology is a great score for Gay Germ theory. I wonder if the ‘men’ indulging in the medically, morally wrong type of sex to imitate porn stars (great sexual role models) will show greater effeminacy (and other atypical gender psychological outcomes). So the pussies complaining about cancer in men as sexist are happily spreading germs they know probably cause cancer in women. No sympathy necessary.

“two-thirds of new cases are diagnosed in women.”

Did I mention the best part?
Men can catch and keep STDs in their urethra from not wearing a condom, it makes you less of a man regardless of where you stick it. It doesn’t just protect the woman/receptive party.  Even the testes are not immune, as Ebola shows.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279435042_Immunophysiology_of_the_Male_Reproductive_Tract

I mean, anal sex with a woman can still result in pregnancy so I don’t know what argument they’ve got at this point.

http://www.womenshealthmag.com/mom/pregnancy-from-anal-sex

Almost like it’s evil (as eating bad pork used to be fatal, prior to antibiotics and electric ovens). All the stuff about the sin of men lying as with other men refers to this practice, it isn’t exclusive to gays but it’s the only internal type they can do, they don’t have as much choice. When God got mad at sodomites, they might’ve been doing it to women, also raising questions about spilling seed with the expected pre-marital stuff to boot. I mention that because the guys who get high and mighty about doing it with women, are actually worse according to the Bible than the homosexuals they look down on.

Wherever anal sex is discussed, it should be dismissed, based on literally ALL the evidence.

Never taught to kids as the ‘same’ and OK to emulate based on porn.

Sex ‘addicts’ bad in bed

Quality over quantity, kittens.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/sex-addicts-biggest-most-embarrassing-6769757

Obviously, why else keep moving on? They can’t satisfy anyone.

“But researchers found they were also more likely to suffer from erectile dysfunction and “sexual boredom”, which can make it impossible to hold down a healthy, loving relationship with just one person.
“While an examination of the relationship between erectile dysfunction and hypersexuality may appear somewhat surprising at first glance, clinicians recognise the role of erectile dysfunction as a feature of hypersexuality.” the team of academics wrote in The Journal of Sexual Medicine.
“Indeed, dysfunction (accompanied by a low desire for partnered sexual activity) is a common observation in the clinical practice with patients seeking help for excessive sexual behavior, whereas these men seem to frequently use pornography and masturbate.””

Women always raise an eyebrow when a man brags about his sex drive. This is why.

“Perhaps unsurprisingly, sex addicts may find it very difficult to hold down a long term love affair – particularly if their private parts are unwilling to perform their erotic role when required.”

Think about it – if they can’t satisfy themselves, could they anyone else?

reallycome on dean

Meanwhile, oral sex HPV cancer link accrues evidence.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/oral-sex-causes-throat-cancer-7221082#rlabs=7%20rt$category%20p$8

Search term pathogenic cancer.

I believe there was a malignant form passed between dogs via sex too. Historically.

Pathogens causing psychology issues again: rage

Intermittent Explosive Disorder, this time. Explains those dumb enough to protest Trump rallies.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rage-disorder-linked-with-parasite-found-in-cat-feces/

Have you ever seen an angry rat? It chews through things and makes a lot of noise. Attracts predators. It’s like a temper tantrum or narcissistic rage.

In the study of more than 350 adults, those with a psychiatric disorder called Intermittent Explosive Disorder, or IED, were twice as likely to have been infected by the toxoplasmosis parasite compared with healthy individuals with no psychiatric diagnosis.

The study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that toxoplasmosis — usually a mild or nonsymptomatic infection from a protozoan parasite called Toxoplasma gondii — may somehow alter people’s brain chemistry to cause long-term behavior problems. Previous studies have linked toxoplasmosis to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, impulsivity and suicidal behavior.

And there are more chronic issues coming out as affected. I wonder if those people had a tendency toward self-delusion prior to infection…

http://neurosciencenews.com/microbes-alzheimers-neurology-3826/

It’s almost like the brain is bathed in a chemical vat for subsistence…

facepalm leslie howard

Are polygyny, promiscuity, hypergamy and cuckoldry pathogenic?

http://www.unz.com/pfrost/first-sexual-transmissibility-and-then/

Yes, why aren’t there studies of vaginal bacteria cultures? Doctors already take millions of samples.
I would also like to see male sample studies from STD checks to ascertain % transmission. As do the men, I would imagine.

Is this why feminists are insistent upon receiving oral? Subconsciously trying to pass on promiscuity or cuckoldry-causing strains?

dean that's enough no more internet laptop shut no no no nuhuh supernatural

This is too much of a fuck-mind to consider all at once. It sounds scarily probable.

Is the cause of feminism pathogenic? The case for T. Gondii

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/breakthrough-medical-treatment-for-feminism-related-disorders/

…Growing evidence revealed in the journal Preventive Veterinary Medicine suggests T. Gondii also causes vast amounts of personality disorders in humans. The CDC reports about 60 million Americans are infected with T. Gondii, which creates brain plaques that can alter human personalities; in particular, it makes people’s thinking more gender neutral: studies show infected women adopt active male-associated traits and infected men adopt passive female-associated traits. In other words, infected humans become feminists as their new behaviors conflict with cultural expectations of normal gender behavior.

Observed mostly anecdotally, the high number of feminist cat lovers is a further result of T Gondii’s modification of human mental processes, creating feminists out of otherwise normal humans who, likewise, lose behavioral and physical characteristics more normalized to their respective genders, much in the same way as T. Gondii makes rodents adopt suicidal sexual desires.

The feminist inclinations inculcated in T. Gondii infected human individuals have additional effects: they disrupt human pair-bonding and sexual reproduction, inevitably leading to a solitary death of the host feminist that can go unnoticed for weeks or even months by the larger, uninfected society. Once one of these infected feminists dies alone and is subsequently consumed by rats or cats, the life cycle of T. Gondii proceeds even faster, but this is not essential to the survival of the infection, merely an enhancement.

Around 20% of the U.S. population is infected with T. Gondii. Also, around 20% of the U.S. population identifies as feminist. Studies of the overlap of these two populations are expected to provide routine confirmations of this discovery, better establishing both correlation and causation of Feminism and related disorders such as schizophrenia by T. Gondii….

Those infected with it (rat studies finding) are docile. They don’t perceive risk or danger correctly. They love everyone. Sound familiar?

For fun, I’ll throw in my 2 pence with this study of how T. Gondii affects human culture.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17015323/

The latent prevalence of a long-lived and common brain parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, explains a statistically significant portion of the variance in aggregate neuroticism among populations, as well as in the ‘neurotic’ cultural dimensions of sex roles and uncertainty avoidance. Spurious or non-causal correlations between aggregate personality and aspects of climate and culture that influence T. gondii transmission could also drive these patterns. A link between culture and T. gondii hypothetically results from a behavioural manipulation that the parasite uses to increase its transmission to the next host in the life cycle: a cat. While latent toxoplasmosis is usually benign, the parasite’s subtle effect on individual personality appears to alter the aggregate personality at the population level. Drivers of the geographical variation in the prevalence of this parasite include the effects of climate on the persistence of infectious stages in soil, the cultural practices of food preparation and cats as pets. Some variation in culture, therefore, may ultimately be related to how climate affects the distribution of T. gondii, though the results only explain a fraction of the variation in two of the four cultural dimensions, suggesting that if T. gondii does influence human culture, it is only one among many factors.