Why does the BBC keep hiring ugly people?
Why does the BBC keep hiring ugly people?
Did the women walk in behind the men doing it?
According to the Koran, the women wearing lipstick are whores.
Blasphemers are not Christians.
When will the right hand possess them?
At this point the only way they could signal harder is with a Circumcision for Solidarity.
Obviously they’re going to get circumcised and not just appropriate their clothing?
Otherwise they aren’t trying hard enough.
But White Guilt is indeed justified in terms of the failure of Western Civilisation – when that failure is seen in terms of apostasy: in terms, that is, of abandonment of Christianity, and the adoption of secular, materialistic, and hedonistic goals (especially the sexual revolution, which puts subverted/ inverted sex and sexuality at the heart of the human condition).
The original sin of baseness.
In sum, White Guilt is caused by Leftism (that is, historically, anti-Christian, anti-religious anti-metaphysical in its origin and basis); which is consistent with the obvious fact that Leftists are most susceptible to White Guilt, and as societies have become more Leftist, they have become overwhelmed by White Guilt: have become paralysed, filled with self-hatred and a semi-covert wish for personal and cultural death.
Thanatos, arguably the root of Do what thou wilt Satanism.
So specific White Guilt is merely a specific instance of the general, legitimate and proper shame of those who have abandoned the proper and necessary centrality of Christianity to the West
*Pathological altruism is also a curiously white problem, genetically.
and who support further abandonment* – and who implicitly (but against their explicit will) recognize that without a Christian rationale – more generally without a central religious basis – The West is necessarily an evil civilisation.
Explains the rise of Christophobia, a reminder of what we lost or wasted.
Like showing a bad Baby Boomer the national debt they wracked up.
(look up rack-rent, Millennials)
It’s getting a denial case to stop projecting. Impossible. Their psyche is constructed on that platform, it’s as impossible to pull yourself up by the bootstraps, literally.
If the false reality is peeled back, even a small crack (look up any so-called “hate fact”), their whole life has been more than a waste but a perversion, a corruption, a series of irreparable deaths. They see their own demon, their Shadow, their own evil, their own worst enemy, has been themselves. Always.
Meaning, their self-destruction, when viewed clearly, was totally logical and deserved.
That last part they are in mortal dread of.
The creature they wanted to become (and presently are, as a human being) only deserves more of the same but combined with the agony of knowing what they did wrong. It’s like Medusa’s gaze, it kills them. They are already dead inside but that revelation (lol) turns them to stone.
In biological terms, it overwhelms their amygdala. Gravity is too strong and disintegrates their ideological bones. By their vaunted evolutionary standard, they are already dead (and have the lifestyle to prove it) and let down every single one of their blood line. They are in outer darkness already. They were fighting against it and so let it take them over. How many mentally ill people consider it a good thing and treat it like a beloved pet? They came to identify with the damaging force.
They see their impotence, their power stolen by lies. Self-improvement to evil.
They can never be rid of it. It is THEM.
Imagine a horror film where the main character finds out he is the serial killer.
Does he kill himself or let it live?
Why else spend all that time travelling?
Why else try to “find yourself” – escape yourself, more like.
With enough lies, and more company, equally miserable, they can stay deluded.
I wanted to explain this because I am not soft on these people at all. I know what’s coming for them. I won’t lift a finger to ease their burden. Nor should any one Good.
What they (later admittedly) revere is what they should fear.
God is not a man. God has no sex and no gender. Considering all the wrath, he sounds quite like the enraged feminine, like Eris, there is a poetic justice (Eris was literally the fairest, it was a test, the apple should have been returned). Comparable to how noble people, with any decency, are called boring or stuck-up. It used to be class and dignity. Jesus had the ancient feminine virtues of wise women, like Athene (who betrayed women in the trial of Orestes). In fact, wise is the same origin as witch. It refers to a deep intuitive knowledge, it isn’t a practice. Witches had the knowledge of natural medicine and power of life or death. Jesus had the knowledge of God as the Christ and power of salvation.
When a person claims they want to change the world, they often mean “to be more like me” aka deluded.
Akin to the atheists trying to produce Heaven/Eden on Earth/Mars. It changes nothing about the problem.
It’s a red swan, trust me.
Shame and ostracization are their greatest fears and quite inevitable.
They’re drugging themselves with male victory soma – steroids.
If they feel the complacency (and entitlement) of the victor, why bother?
(The testosterone released by compulsive masturbators has the same effect, teenage boys used to have more motivation when it was discouraged, SJWs noticed).
Testosterone is the dominant hormone in both male and female brains.
regulates the turnover of the social monoamines, dopamine and serotonin.
They’re happy pills, indirect happy pills.
For people too proud to admit they’re depressed.
The hormone also has many other actions in the brain; thus the social brain’s main chemical, without exaggeration, is testosterone
Peterson told you none of this.
investigate social dominance and trustworthiness behaviors
Whatever I say, they’ll insult me.
Actually, why do I care what they think? Who else does?
Fine. If you need to get energy from drugs, and don’t see that as a problem to be dropped at some point, you’re as bad a degenerate as the people you insult. Why do you think they’re doing it??
(Also: why r-types do drugs. There’s nothing intellectual about it. To avoid negative consequences, they get high or drunk or laid again, to avoid the experience’s outcome and the need to learn from it).
Guardian test, they’re doing it. For the “energy” = narc supply.
But women don’t care about looks, huh….. keep telling yourself that.
At best, you’re the Beautiful Ones. Still unfit and not masculine.
Studies in animals have implicated the amygdala in emotional and social behaviours, especially those related to fear and aggression. Although lesion and functional imaging studies in humans have demonstrated the amygdala’s participation in recognizing emotional facial expressions, its role in human social behaviour has remained unclear. We report here our investigation into the hypothesis that the human amygdala is required for accurate social judgments of other individuals on the basis of their facial appearance. We asked three subjects with complete bilateral amygdala damage to judge faces of unfamiliar people with respect to two attributes important in real-life social encounters: approachability and trustworthiness. All three subjects judged unfamiliar individuals to be more approachable and more trustworthy than did control subjects.The impairment was most striking for faces to which normal subjects assign the most negative ratings: unapproachable and untrustworthy looking individuals. Additional investigations revealed that the impairment does not extend to judging verbal descriptions of people. The amygdala appears to be an important component of the neural systems that help retrieve socially relevant knowledge on the basis of facial appearance.
Basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex are implicated in cue-outcome learning. In this issue of Neuron, Schoenbaum et al. show that, following basolateral amygdala lesions, cue-selective neurons in orbitofrontal cortex are more sensory driven and less sensitive to the motivational value of an outcome, suggesting that predictive value coding in orbitofrontal cortex is dependent on input from basolateral amygdala.
They’re conditioning themselves for pathological altruism.
By making your brain happy, you make it dumber.
It’s the illusion of safety. Your body assumes the threat is dead.
Your body also produces less of a thing when you supplement. Basic biology.
So men and women shouldn’t take any sex hormones unless they produce zero.
If your levels are normal (for your AGE, Peter Pan), you’re poisoning yourself.
Yet others still have suggested that hypogonadal males (a.k.a low testosterone-producing males) who had their testosterone increased saw no jump in aggressive behaviour, and in fact became more friendly, energetic and, well, happy.
If you’re being treated badly, the chemical suffering is vital to fixing that. It’s like cutting off nerves, they’ve deadened their sense of injustice.
Notice how when men get power, they become over-friendly and obliging?
Ah, they say, but wouldn’t this also occur in women?
The result: the women who had received testosterone without knowing became fairer, more generous and had increased efficiency in social interactions, while the other group (those who had been told that they were receiving testosterone) behaved much more unfairly. In sum: one group acted they way they thought testosterone should affect humans (and it wasn’t pretty). But the reality was much different. Case and point, ladies and gentlemen.
Notice how many pathological altruist women are high-T? And middle-class?
You’re buying the chemical fake equivalent of class. I cannot think of anything more indicative of a loser.
I used to think it was the broke guy with a sportscar.
If anyone’s doping T, it should be women. It makes us nicer and better looking. When we produce less naturally, no loss.
It’s always the “inferior” men who abuse women, isn’t it? They seem to be lacking in T.
In civilization, status is conferred to men who cooperate. Killers get wiped out quickly.
And nothing less.
If you want someone to leave an area, don’t make them feel welcome.
If you befriend them, they’ll never go. NEVER EVER EVER.
A lot of men are weak on this point. “He’s an alright bloke, it’s just all the people like him that are the problem!”
They didn’t even need a horse, FFS. They just turn up and these morons go “this is fine” like nothing will change. There’s never just one and they send the nice one first.
It’s called boiling the frog.
Foot in the door.
You feed one cat and suddenly all of them are there, waiting.
If you feed a sense of belonging, they stay. They have attached like a leech to your philia and suck and suck and suck until you finally notice.
That is pathological altruism. Idiots.
Of course, even love of one’s neighbour is only observed theoretically and as a means of signalling that you are on the right side. Incidentally, I find that loving your distant neighbour is now used as an excuse to pay less attention to your near one, demonstrating that love has little to do with it and is just used as an excuse to dismantle traditional structures of truth and rob them of their spiritually protective qualities.
So modern liberal doctrines might have some truth in them but it is the truth of a counterfeit rather than the genuine article. Indeed liberalism is best seen as precisely that, a counterfeit of Christianity, a Christianity flattened out, secularised and brought down to this world. It was very probably specifically designed to replace the real thing by apparently retaining the good bits
but throwing out the superstitions. In fact, it does the very opposite and keeps the shell while discarding the nut.
But then those who oppose liberal doctrines must take care that they do not fall into the extreme of denying these have any validity at all, even on a relative level. If you oppose liberalism, as you should, you must not let that push you into the opposite extreme.
Remember there are two commandments, love God and love man. The latter must be seen in the light of the former but if you neglect the latter then you become almost as bad as those who neglect or deny God. This too is part of the test of today. Don’t let the lies of the enemy lead you into the over-reaction of rejecting the reality of the truth he presents in a deformed and corrupted state….
there is now no excuse for being a Leftist, its falsity and its evil are there for all to see – in the foreground and in the background, in books and in our daily lives and face to face conversations.
Every single Left Wing prediction has failed. Count ’em.
Every. Single. One.
While a century, or two, ago the pretensions of atheism, materialism, radicalism, modernism etc. were superficially plausible – now they are not.
Assuming human beings have their eyes open.
Generally, I have found them to be walking around with both eyes shut.
They don’t want to see.
It would be inconvenient.
They might need to change and self-improve in real ways and actually give up things that are bad for them.
Not the January selfie model of self-improvement.
I’m considered very good-looking and even I think the selfie thing has gotten silly.
Another post: https://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2016/07/why-are-things-coming-to-point-now-in.html
“This is a time when those on the side of Good should not fear: fear is the motivation of evil, not Good. Evil is afraid because it is ultimately unnatural – a web of lies – and must be sustained artificially by energy, effort, control…”
Love the truth and hate the Father of Lies. Now..
Someone help me down from this pulpit.
Old but gold. A lot of new people won’t have seen this.
The gist of the concept? To assist the outgroup at the expense of the ingroup.
To ‘help’ in such a way that objectively and permanently hurts.
Where soft-heartedness becomes sadism.
Where conscientiousness becomes toxic and kindness, abusive.
Compassion as harm or self-harm. Self-loathing is part of it, a socially desirable means of self-destruction.
The self-righteous people who virtue signal, are covered in her book specifically.
This lady wrote the book. The seminal intellectual standard on the topic.
It has its own wikipedia page:
Chapter 1 sample:
It’s an official academic book published by Oxford University Press.
Can’t get more legitimate than that, can you? Read it, keep it, it’s a classic.
Gift it to Guardian readers if you’re feeling salty.
Best Amazon review:
Of particular interest to me, as a clinical psychologist, is how the information in this book illustrates the phenomenon of infantalizing people or otherwise restricting their emotional growth which then renders them, from a developmental standpoint, perpetual adolescents and thus pathologically dependent on others. The research provided by the multiple contributors to this amazing book provides very convincing, if not concrete, examples of doing for adults what they can do for themselves, and how it harms them for a lifetime. It also covers the areas where narcissistic individuals, to include doctors, lawyers, psychologists, social workers, and politicians, “do for others” against the others’ wishes. To infantilize someone the process is simple: Take over or dismiss their decision making process, remove personal responsibility, remove lessons or consequences for life choices, and then blame other people or institutions for the disastrous personal choices one makes. As well, to continue to save someone from him or herself is the primary construct of the infantalization process. The targets of pathological “care” never learn to adapt to life’s slings and arrows, they never learn critical thinking skills, and they remain vulnerable, controllable, and dependent on others for their daily life decisions. This incredible book describes the process thoroughly. It should be required reading in any university “helping profession” curriculum as well as for every politician in office. To those who insist on cradle to grave “caring” of others, you may need therapy after reading this book.