Thou shalt not question liberal creationism. But sex/race is not biological, only sex-uality, somehow.
All inequalities are caused by individuals, but also systems, unless they repent.
Thou shalt not question the motives of any signalling nor its source.
Thou shalt be degenerate in thy sexuality, for the glory of herpes-san and the Glaxo stockholders.
Thou shalt corrupt thy youth, to better eliminate all possibility of traditional resurgence.
Thou shalt decry your inferiors as stupid, classism is encouraged. Thou shalt dehumanise the meek and poor, to protect them against themselves.
All disagreements are either ‘ignorant’ or false consciousness, a kind of evil possession by the spirit of Hitler. Thou shalt never consider the studies or proofs contra to the dogma. To be bigoted is good, unless one is ‘uneducated’.
Thou shalt support thy own destruction and advocate one’s own genocide by uplifting other races, level 1 Asian, level 2 African and level 3 the raceless, as your genetic and cultural superiors.
Thou shalt deny religion while adhering to cult-like tenets and never oppose its dogma.
Thou shalt call all virtues a vice, an oppression.
Thou shalt publicly proclaim the godly goodness of political correctness.
Thou shalt push secular dogma as normal and desirable conversation topics with strangers. Convert all unbelievers or else, shun them.
Thou shalt envy and beg the government punish them for the following sins;
being sexually pure,
being moral around the immoral, aka common sense, and thereby shaming them by negative example,
and blaspheming against these tenets with the unforgivable sin of original thought.
Thou shalt advocate eugenics, such as killing babies or the feeble and old, unless expressly described as such.
Thou shalt also proclaim the equality of humans as a species without laughing.
Thou shalt support the welfare cliff, to secure votes.
Thou shalt support white country colonialism, to secure votes.
Thou shalt oppose rape, unless it be corrective by a Muslim or a Jew.
Thou shalt push for freedom, via government surveillance and organ ownership.
Thou shalt censor the thoughts and thereby, the spirit.
In the holy name of futile usury, Amen.
The convenient, anti-white We, fellow white people. By the way, try polyamory! Marriage is over-rated, ignore the studies. Being family oriented is for squares, look at the Boomers, they did fine! If you do marry, nothing is sacred. Being a cuck is okay if God is dead!
“We’re free because we say we are”.
Ok, breathe underwater since you hate being human.
The reprobate mind is repetitive, I tire of it.
“we r special and modern and smart, virtue isn’t real lol”
Keep giving your shekels to corporations who’d let you die in the street. Sweet replacement for family.
Individualism is the belief system of weaklings. Perma-adolescents.
“you can’t tell me how to live!” angst
It’s easy to spot a slut because they assume everyone else is. If you point out their statistical rarity, they melt down in angst.
I love how the second half is bitching like an omega but instead of admitting the depression and changing (like an adult) they double down on being a degenerate.
I figured when they had a bloke randomly sing with and kiss a tranny (to applause, of course) and then a race mixing weeb proudly talk about how much of a cuck he was. Why yes, betray your ancestors, kiss a boy (in a dress, no less) and “like” it. Very anti-establishment.*
*Standard BBC3 fare.
It’s like the male version of “I’m so random” rawr XD girls.
If men spontaneously tend to become leaders, then in an allocative system should favour women; if humans are naturally heterosexual, then allocative systems should favour any preference except heterosexuality; if a particular group rules and another is ruled, then the allocative system should invert the existing hierarchy.
If humans are naturally monogamous (we are), then polygamy lite aka hook-up “culture”, if humans are naturally racially selective, then miscegenation with any other race. If white nations are civilized, then rapper culture of disrespecting women and family and propriety.
Being merely subversive and crudely inversional, the positive policies of political correctness are therefore arbitrary, changeable over time – generating a stream of stimulating novelties for the jaded bureaucratic palate.
The evaluation of PC policies in terms of human happiness, suffering, income or any other principle is again variable – and often PC policies will make things worse from any common-sensical and experiental perspective.
But none of that matters, since the politically correct solution is always intrinsically superior in so far as it removes the scope or possibility of individual selfishness.
You’re not allowed to laugh at them.
See: Why mockery?
As narcissists, your laughter is like death to them.
….For political correctness to act as if Virtue is higher than Truth and Beauty is therefore very swiftly to embrace that which opposesThe Good – not merely the narrowly wicked (anti-virtuous) idea of Bad, but further to destroy the whole capacity for Good.
Political Correctness is purposefully subversive of The Good
PC is not ignorant of The Good – it knows what is The Good.
PC must indeed know enough about The Good, that it may subvert it.
And indeed, knowledge of The Good is built into humans: this is termed Natural Law
The point of PC is that it systematically subverts Virtue, Beauty and Truth and pursues wickedness, ugliness and lies – and not by accident, not merely by ignorance nor by selfish short-termism – but as a matter of the highest principle.
In morality, PC pursues the-opposite-of-Virtue. It learns about spontaneous human morality – Natural Law – and it does… something else.
Political correctness subverts the natural and spontaneous. It reacts-against it. In practice it does the opposite, or what it conceives to be the opposite: PC inverts.
Because humans naturally love Beauty, and value those who create Beauty; therefore PC subverts Beauty and aggressively promotes dysphoric stimuli. Politically correct art is anti-Beauty – it regards The Beautiful as Kitsch at best and tyrannically fascist at worst; it is about creating expectations then thwarting them, it is about replacing harmony with dissonance, edification with shock, delight with horror, pleasing sounds with noise, elevating subjects with disgusting subjects, aesthetic elevation with visceral degradation.
replacing in general
your genes, clothes, music, paintings, opinions
it is vulgar and crude, its adherents worship their own baseness
they project what they fear: replacement with good genes, good fashion, good music, good paintings, reasoned opinions, funny comedy
Don’t fight them, fuck them, as Littlefinger pointed out. Fuck them up by outshining them.
For years, some people focused (against my advice) on Reaction Vids. That still gives them cultural hegemony. People don’t want warmed-up shit. Give them something better instead, the bar’s never been lower!
They want to be relevant – so ignore them.
A lot of blokes struggle to realise the POWER of omission.
Stop feeding them your attention.
Their street creed is how much they offend the right wing. Starve the Beast.
And PC reacts against The Truth. Truth is to be subordinated to the goal of subversion. Unwanted Truths are Hate Facts. Universally known Truths are replaced with narrow scraps of bureaucratically defined principles; spontaneous and obvious knowledge is contested, undermined, broken-up and contradicted one fragment at a time and replaced with Professional Consensus (Peer Review).
This article analyzes the effortful control of automatic processing related to social and emotional behavior, including control over evolved modules designed to solve problems of survival and reproduction that were recurrent over evolutionary time. The inputs to effortful control mechanisms include a wide range of nonrecurrent information–information resulting not from evolutionary regularities but from explicit appraisals of costs and benefits. Effortful control mechanisms are associated with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the ventral anterior cingulated cortex. These mechanisms are largely separate from mechanisms of cognitive control (termed executive function) and working memory, and they enable effortful control of behavior in the service of long range goals. Individual differences in effortful control are associated with measures of conscientiousness in the Five Factor Model of personality. Research in the areas of aggression, ethnocentrism, sexuality, reward seeking, and emotion regulation is reviewed indicating effortful control of automatic, implicit processing based on explicit appraisals of the context. Evidence is reviewed indicating that evolutionary pressure for cooperation may be a critical adaptive function accounting for the evolution of explicit processing.
Incentives are everything. Stop saying degeneracy and other weakness is okay.
We get imprisoned more than a capitalist in China.
The bacon mosque guy was murdered.
For a prank.
There’s suppression and then there’s a literal threat of death.
Various people have tried to doxx me (and been wrong, like no I’m not a Russian, not a man, etc etc) but while being illegal itself (both finding that data and disseminating it) would also be incitement to violence, up to and including death. So add on aiding and abetting GBH, murder. And you wonder why women aren’t online talking about any of these topics? Please. Most of them cave into vanity or hide behind a husband from cowardice, also limiting their topics…. then what’s the point? They’re afraid to offend. You should be offended, it’s good for you. Bruce Charlton’s got a lot of good material on this. It’s metaphysical, people shouldn’t take it so personally. Either there’s proof (like the China food theft thing that cucks tried to twist into All Asians when no, China is not even most Asians) or there’s other information like a train of logic that can be debunked and if you can’t…. why do you still want to dismiss it? When women mention these things it’s different than when men do it. Men debate for fun, women for survival. When a woman brings up an issue, that’s the time to worry. It isn’t a joke and joking about it is foolish. Women are people-pleasers so to bring up anything, least of all an uncomfortable topic, you sit up and pay attention. The Vikings trusted the wives with the family money, thinking they could see into the future. Women do have an intuition about the environment, to raise a family in it. We still entrust women with the family purse, to buy the food and other supplies. This is not a game.
PC is a cult and it’s death to the sane. You can’t even ask to be left alone. The Race Relations Act (UK) revoked our right to hire by merit LONG before ‘equality’ targets. Meritocracy died with that legislation, targets of obedience for show came later. You don’t wanna be the first corporate to stop clapping that rainbow flag. Track GDP since the RRA came through, it’s quite something.
Diversity is our strength, look at GDP! So good for companies, it must be enforced by the State!
But yeah, evil, evil data. Communism happens to other countries that… tell you… who you can… hire….
Yes. I went there.
The Orwell wording is the worst part.
The IQ ceiling in hiring is just silly. Every occupation has an IQ minimum to perform, there is no maximum but employee demand. Surely discriminatory companies are a good thing, since discrimination means to parse quality? Surely companies prejudiced against talent would fail? This credentialism is trying to get around the system while also profiting from tokens, have no pity when they lose their shorts.
Anti-competence laws, anti-competent managers kowtowing to them.
Isn’t the purpose of state schooling discrimination based on the academic IQ? Why have grades? They’re an IQ proxies. If all students are equal, do away with sets, have ONE exam board for ALL schools (even Eton) and ONE exam paper of equal difficulty (since we’re all the same, mentally). There should be no psychometrics, so education majors should be locked up for tracking ‘progress’, which is 100% of the thing they do.
The status quo is intellectually dishonest. It’s okay when they do it, since you’re evil.
Hollywood is 100% propaganda. Why else would it exist? A slice of America that evades ((taxes)) and doesn’t represent either higher art or Americans? Why does it get tax breaks while evading paying the taxpayer public?
Cuckservatives annoy me more than libertarians pretending to be centrists because at least the latter admit their beliefs are entirely selfish. Cuckservatives act like family men but also like the idea their daughter might become a hooker or their son might grow drugs. Obviously family values.
7,600 views as of now. Needs to be longer. Like the rope The Guardian is using to hang itself.
The more you know about ye olde public hangings, the funnier that joke gets.
Greta is literally weaponised autism. ...It isn’t very effective.
This is also worth a try.
There needs to be an UnPC ezine of some description recommending this stuff.
The Guardian is the jobcentre of obnoxious twats because your parents were so ashamed they cut you out of the trust fund. If you’re too dumb for academia and too bland for acting and too serious for politics, you’ll fit right in.
If they want a million views, half an hour on why Islam is toxic masculinity and toxic masculinity secretly means Islam, because it does. Everything they slag off – harassment, lechery, rape, oppression of wives (equal yoking), all of it. It literally is a pop. They want all men to act more white Christian and less Anything Else. It’s psyops to bring back white supremacy culture a la British Empire (which was multicultural) but without men in charge (coughs Victoria was a slag and sold out our identity like a cheap whore*). Now THAT would get da views.
*Now every arsehole calls themselves British because they drink tea.
No. That’s Chinese. English people secretly hate tea, we’re just addicted.
British died with the Empire, why are we still using this word? Nobody means Welsh do they? They all want to be English. It’s actually a race, no. This isn’t like Doctor Who psychic paper. “Hello, yes, this is my white privilege, as you can see here it says British, cuckold of the Greater European Empire of Supreme Woke Values. Praise be Allah-Gaia.”
Surprised they haven’t run an “initiative” called “pegged against Patriarchy”.
THE BBC has come under fire for broadcasting a segment on Halal meat on Sunday night’s Countryfile with viewers accusing the Corporation of hitting a “new low” and “justifying vile Halal slaughter practices on our soil”.
Mr Heap said: “Like some other religions how the animal is killed is significant and for Muslims that means Halal slaughter in which a blessing is said before the animal dies.
Discussing the practice the Imam said: “There are certain practices where you want to fulfil a commandment of God and you’re basically invoking God’s name upon that. You are making the sacrifice in the name of God and now it’s made Halal. Halal means permissible and it’s been made permissible by God for you.”
It isn’t our God. That’s a violation of our human rights.
BELGIUM is set to challenge European Union laws on halal and kosher slaughter in a court case that could have massive repercussions across the bloc.
The french-speaking region of Wallonia, on September 1, will become the second Belgian authority to ban halal and kosher slaughter in a move to ban killing animals without first stunning them.
It’s barbaric. They try to call it “traditional” in our news propaganda but it isn’t traditional here, it doesn’t belong here and never will. Also, the Muslim religion is so young it should barely merit anyone’s consideration.
Flanders first introduced a ban, which came into effect on New Year’s Day, on the Muslim and Jewish ways of ritually slaughtering animals. Critics of the ban have suggested the move comes as part of a shift to an anti-immigrant shift across Belgium as the right-wing Flemish nationalists continue to cement themselves in mainstream politics.
Or Europe wants to be European? If they don’t like it, fuck off home.
While the court could take up to two years, any decision could set a precedent for the whole of the European Union.
A number of EU countries, such as Denmark, Sweden and Denmark, have banned traditional slaughter without stunning.
But the court challenge will test European laws between animal welfare and religious freedoms across the bloc.
The freedom not to eat that shit?
Mohamed Bouezmarni, the head of the Muslin association in the town of Arlon, has warned bans could drive the ritual slaughter underground.
He told Politico: “Everyone will do it at home, or in some corner, hidden from view.
Grounds for deportation.
“I think that is not the animal activist’s aim.”
Pinchas Goldschmidt, the president of the Conference of European Rabbis, warned Jews were left as “collateral damage” while bans targeted the Muslim community.
Go home to Judea. Nobody cares.
Europeans want their continent to have our own people’s practices.
That’s our birthright.
If you go to Y. Tube and look up hal al slaughter you will see the horrific abuse these animals are put through , they are kicked , thrown about , and the sheer terror is plain to see in the animals. This barbaric practice is abhorrent , worse till in moos lime countries , were people, including children stand and watch, laughing at the terrified animals, and blood running down the streets .
I have seen it for real in a slaughter house about 50 years ago. The animal to be killed and those in close proximity can hear, smell and sense it and the cries and screams they make is awful to hear and see them struggling. The problem with the meat though is that any animal that suffers unnecessary or undue stress means that their bloodstream is packed with endorphins that are released and it is said that the meat does not taste as good as it would do if not stunned first in a calmer environment. Personally I would rather limit the practice so that the majority of the population who are non-participants of those faiths know that animals were killed humanely.
aka civilization? yeah, we have a bias to that
It’s also more bitter and tough from the adrenaline, a taste the East prefers, so you can’t even justify from a taste perspective.
They are pure scum these people that put animals through this type of abuse.,
Unfortunately, these backward peoples do not share our thoughts about cruelty to animals. They seem to gain some pleasure from maintaning the practice on the grounds that the man with a child bride said so. Obscene.
You forgot the part where he ordered his son to divorce so he could rape the wife. What Muslims call visions were literally just lucid dreams, it’s demonic to pass that off as religion.
Islam and Judaism, the kiddy rape religions.
High time the UK also banned these cruel practices. If a persons religion stops them from eating non-Halal meat they can become vegetarians
It’s laughable seeing Butchers trying to make Halal Slaughter look good
Ritual and Slaughter are two words that should never be combined in anything considered legal. It is illegal for very good reasons and there should be no exceptions.
They merely practiceon non-human animals.
With Kosher, we all know Jack the Ripper. That’s why he killed them by the neck, a tricky thing unless you’re a halal/kosher butcher. There are multiple tough layers of tissue. He ate Mary Kelly’s face.
Take a good, long, hard look. Should this ritualistic killing practice be legal in the First World?
And that guy tried the same thing on the non-jew mother of his child.
“ripping parts of her face off and draining her of all her blood in their Hollywood apartment”
same as Mary Kelly
An autopsy found she was tortured for eight agonising hours before she died from her injuries.
What does that look like?
Allow them to train in this and it’s probable they’ll use it on you once they have numbers.
From the recent murder:
Her skull was exposed after parts of her scalp and one ear were either cut or ripped away.
Or chewed off.
According to the Toronto Sun, Dr James Ribe of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office said: “I have never seen this before.
“And I doubt hardly any forensic pathologists in this country or abroad have even seen this, outside of, perhaps, wartime … it’s extremely rare.
“[Her] entire scalp was traumatically absent and was not found, was not present with the body.”
The report shows there was also an injury to Kasian’s jaw that appeared to be human bite marks.
Those are similar to Kelly.
So this religious sacrifice stuff is not trivial.
comment from Express paper
One way to deal with it is to mark all food that is halal as such, and no meat prepared where ANY halal slaughter happens is marked as halal. Then we, the non barbaric people of the planet, can refuse to buy any halal meat and avoid all shops where halal is sold.
They want to deceive.
For example all NZ lamb is halal, ALL of it. But this is not marked. And if you ask any of the major supermarkets if they can guarantee that any particular cut of meat they produce is or is not halal they cannot guarantee this. Why? Because they are scared. Let us make them scared of going broke!
The law is already there. They need a legal case.
A fine point here
Imagine the debate if freedom of religion was extended to people following the Incas’ religion. Should the human victims be stunned before their hearts are ripped out?
Yeah, that’s the point. You’re training up executioners. Just in case a One World Religion were forced on us at any point.
Our supermarkets should be legally obliged to label meat which is halal/kosher so that as consumers we can make an informed view as to whether or not to buy it.
“Under the Consumer Rights Act, traders have certain obligations when they supply goods (including digital products) to a consumer. This basically means that your business has to comply with certain rules when you sell things to customers.
Under the legislation, the products you sell must:
be of a satisfactory quality
be fit for purpose
match the description
be installed correctly, if installation was part of the contract”
Implying non-Halal when it isn’t, is a violation. Deception by omission.
There are others but I can’t be bothered to go hunting when it’s obvious. Transparency is vital.
if they want this kind of slaughtered babaricly meat, go to your country of ancestry. too much of muslim and jewish ways are being forced on us.
The Jews made up Islam to weaponise against Christian Europe, study up.
The child rape exemption is a critical similarity. Oddly similar ages and everything.
Non-Muslims can’t have Halal, it’s idolatry and an animal sacrifice when Jesus was the last sacrifice. But Muslims can eat Kosher…. it’s the same religion. Atheists also have a right to abstain from these products, it’s basic consent.
“During the process, a Muslim will recite a dedication, know as tasmiya or shahada.”
“Tesco says the only difference between the halal meat it sells and other meat is that it was blessed as it was killed.”
“Blessed?” Are you serious? No wonder their company is tanking.
Ever since this came out, 2014, people are boycotting.
They’ve lost clean half their pricing.
“Stunning of livestock has been mandatory in the the EU since 1979, although member states can grant exemptions for religious slaughter.
Note: Member…. states… not nations. Sections of EU Empire.
Some countries, including Denmark, have opted to ban non-stunning slaughter altogether. The UK government says it has no intention of banning religious slaughter.”
How many Gov petitions can you ban? Can we reach Brexit Party for comment?
“Jewish law strictly forbids the use of stunning and meats are not blessed in the same way.
Unlike for halal, kashrut does not require God’s name to be said before every slaughter after an initial blessing.”
Not our God. Who is we?
“Currently, there is no requirement for halal or kosher meat to be specifically labelled.”
False, trades description act and various consumer protection laws as well as religious rights to decline consent (it’s idolatry to any other religion so Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist etc).
The laws are right there. You are neglecting the population and animal rights in refusing to enforce them. There’s a negligence here bordering on criminal “oversight”.
Slight detour but relevant. #######
Presumed consent with organs is also a violation. Will you care when they book your euthanasia appointment? The boat people need transplants, evil Anglo. You had an unlicensed opinion and the diversity board has voted to terminate you with extreme prejudice. Yet nobody is asking in the run-up to this election. A country of sheep led to slaughter.
“If passed, it is expected to come into effect in England in spring 2020 – because the timetable for its introduction will allow for a year of “transition” to the new law.”
“Under the new law, those who do not wish to donate their organs will still be able to opt out via the register and by using an NHS app that launches at the end of the year.”
Opt-outs make “errors” and bodies are raped anyway (yes, it’s organ rape, the forcible seizure or taking), found hollowed-out when checked. We won’t gut you, trust the app! What if they don’t have access to the app? Old phone, no phone? Even the Nazis didn’t do this shit.
“Currently, fewer than half of families give consent for their loved one’s organs to be donated if they are unaware of their wishes, and ministers hope that the new system will encourage people to make their wishes known before their death”
They’re going to over-ride the families with it.
“Under the new plans, specialist nurses will be on hand to discuss donation with families after a loved one dies.” Guilt-tripping the grief stricken, shame on them. And define “dies” because viable organs are still alive at the point they’re ripped out, it’s murder. So after it’s proclaimed dead but not biologically?
“We need to address myths and misconceptions around donation, and we will only do this by having informed debate and dialogue, which I hope will be fostered by these proposals.”
Are all NHS doctors obligated by oath to donate? No? Huh. Funny that. All politicians signing this in at least? Why won’t this register be public? It would reduce errors.
Consent to donate, comrade. We won’t kill you.Here, take a shiny cutesy death card and await treatment for twelve hours before we suspiciously put you/r loved one on a Death Care Pathway (still done).
What’s to stop ‘mistakes’ when they plant cards on people who didn’t want it? You can’t ask questions, the state owns your body. China is a human rights monster, remember?
“We must have a full, consistent public education system with faith groups, schools, colleges, universities, and with the public as well,” she said.
Revelations doesn’t apply to you if you’ve been butchered. I do wonder if the cannibals are planning on nicking a lot of this organ meat. I find it odd Jimmy Saville wanted to be left alone in NHS morgues with fresh human corpses.
We live in Hell, I’m 99% sure. Gaslighting kids to donate their organs when 3D printing exists but they’re too cheap to do it (despite a rejection rate of zero). Lord, please destroy socialism soon.
Consent to your destruction, all this says. If you think it isn’t related, including the Cannibalism for Global Warming initiative, you haven’t been paying attention.
“The HFA says many slaughterhouses will have chosen to move to halal processes so they do not lose Muslim customers.
The latest census suggests there are 2.7 million Muslims in the UK, with a spending power estimated in the region of £20bn.”
Latest was done almost ten years ago.
“Jewish and Muslim leaders agree, and have called for “comprehensive labelling” of meat.”
THEN WHY ISN’T THIS ACTED UPON. WE NEED COMMENT PRE-ELECTION.
Especially since this is EU related and we had Parliament petitions.
Abigail Ward, 16, who attends Gildredge House school in Eastbourne, East Sussex, was told by exam board OCR that she had made ‘obscene racial comments’ while answering her Religious Studies exam in June.
On the subject of halal butchers, the student had written, ‘…which I find absolutely disgusting.’
Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, the 36-year-old said the family were shocked by the decision to disqualify her daughter, and the exam board has since been overturned the decision.
Rat being tapped out of a halal animal like it’s normal. The conditions are disgusting and we’ve seen people filming in the places here, videos on the paper websites, with loud music terrifying the animals and what looks like shit everywhere because they were so terrified.
As far from clean as possible.
The prevalence of animals with bilateral false aneurysms was 7 and 8 percent for
Shechita and Halal slaughter, respectively, whereas no false aneurysms occurred during
bleeding in cattle that were electrically stunned and simultaneously developed a cardiac arrest. The authors concluded that combination of false aneurysms and collateral routes to the brain present a risk of sustained consciousness during religious slaughter in cattle.
….Velarde et al. (2003) showed that lambs that were hoisted and bled without being stunned, lost less blood from the sticking wound than lambs that were electrically stunned (250 V, 50 Hz,
3 s), hoisted and then stuck.
aka the more European way
The authors mentioned as a likely explanation that the muscle
contractions associated with electrical stunning forced blood away from skeletal muscles
towards the vessels in the thorax and abdomen.
And other proof of its inhumanity. 80 pages of it.
Aspiration of blood and refluxing gut content after the incision was considered a welfare concern after slaughter without stunning. Though this problem was mainly associated with the
inverted position, it occurred with the upright position for both Halal and Shechita slaughter (Gregory et al., 2009). The authors examined bovine respiratory tracts following Shechita and
Halal slaughter without stunning, and also in captive bolt stunned animals. During all the
treatments animals received the cut in the upright position. The study found blood lining the
inner aspect of the trachea in 19% of the Shechita, 58% of the Halal and 21% of the
stunned/cut cattle. Blood was found in the upper bronchi of 36% of Shechita, 69% of Halal
and 31% of stunned/cut cattle. Ten percent of the Shechita, 19% of the Halal and 0% of the stunned/cut cattle had fine bright red blood-tinged foam in the trachea. Blood covering the
larynx was recorded for all cattle. It was concluded that concerns about suffering from airway irritation by blood could apply in animals that are either not stunned before slaughter or do not lose consciousness rapidly whilst blood is present in the respiratory tract (Gregory et al.,
2009). These concerns are based on the fact that fluid in the respiratory tract in conscious
animals leads to irritation of sensory receptors lining the airway, and in particular the
receptors on the glottis and the carina of the trachea. In animals with intact vagus nerves there
could have been a cough or expulsion reflex, but coughing would be absent when the vagi had
been severed (Canning, 2007) though lower airway irritation may still occur through
sympathetic-spinal afferent pathways (Quin et al., 2007).
Again animals are put into these restrainers by hand and the head is supported
by hand during and after the cut. Sheep have been observed shackled by one leg (Catanese et
al., 2009; Cenci Goga et al., 2009) before sticking for Kosher slaughter (up to 17 kg
liveweight, line speed exceeded 200 sheep/ h) and for Halal slaughter (sheep up to 55 kg
liveweight, line speed could exceed 150 sheep/ h). Shackling time averages ranged between 1 and 4 minutes before performance of the cut, but can reach 5 minutes if the time was needed to sharpen the knife or if the operator had to approach first to perform the cut. During
shackling before sticking some sheep hung calmly whereas others struggled. Struggling was
increased if a sheep touched another struggling sheep. Sheep reactions also included turning the head to the side and apparently looking around, kicking with the hind leg and vigorous struggling including movements of the whole body. In the last case, the movements were thought to be escape behaviour. Struggling and vocalisation sometimes occurred in response to the cut.
Vocalising in sheep sound like a child screaming MAAAAA for its mother, it’s eerie and almost human.
Keep eating halal and telling yourself it’s okay.
The whole paper is kinda like that. The animals beg to be let go, that’s probably why they like it.
Other methods are to place the bird in a cone before performing the cut or placing the birds in lateral
recumbency for Halal slaughter. According to Dialrel experience, restraining poultry for
Shechita was performed manually or by shackling chickens and turkeys before cutting,
although the latter was not according to kosher rules. During shackling chickens could hang
calmly or show wing flapping which in some cases was vigorous and long lasting.
Less suffering huh?
Including Halal Tufano. Don’t buy from him, he doesn’t even put it on his FAQs.
“The lack of honesty and accountability in the current market for naturally raised animal products has driven me to provide people a product they can find their true health with.”
“We will be sourcing meat from farmers raising animals for us to these quality standards.”
Highest quality Halal cuckery. You have to write to him before he’ll admit it, which is illegal.
“Halal signage be displayed where an establishment sells both halal and non-halal products”
As is that. He doesn’t label and it’s meant to be per product like with allergies.
Trust no cuck, [bonus gifs at end] you actually have to seek this out even from people who pretend not to be snowflakes. It’s sad I know this legal side and Americans don’t… or pretend not to. No document disclosure either.
NEW YORK “All food items must also have a halal label affixed to them when they are packaged and being sold as such”
You know they have to hire Muslims to do it too right?
“Slaughter by a Muslim”
So they’re isolating the food industry from Westerners.
When sheep are group stunned in a pen, they may hide their heads under animals which makes it difficult to correctly place the electrodes.
The average number of cuts as reported by Gregory et al. (2008) was 3.2 cuts during Shechita and 5.2 cuts during Halal slaughter of cattle.
The one cut propaganda is a LIE.
In sheep, according to the experience of the Dialrel WP2 members, the minimum number of cuts required to sever the major blood vessels of the neck for Halal (without stunning) and kosher slaughter ranged from 1 to 6. For cattle
either one or up to 60 sweeps of knife have been found.
Up to 60.
Religion of cruelty.
For poultry usually one cut was
performed. Additionally to multiple cuts, after withdrawing the knife from the wound, additional cuts were sometimes performed during Kosher and Halal slaughter. Each time the
knife touches the surface of the wound the potential exists for further nociceptor activation.
Even if the knife blade is twice as long as the width of the throat, there are limitations to cut the neck of large cattle with a small number of cuts. This is due to the fact that according to
the area to be cut the length of the blade increases disproportionately depending on the
pressure that can be applied by the operator (Adams and Sheridan, 2008).
Especially in sheep but also in cattle an additional aspect may be thick wool or coat, which
may have to be parted before the cut. Otherwise this would constrain the blade during cutting
and could cause blunting of the blade. Blunt blades are especially welfare relevant if the neck
is not sufficiently stretched to fixate the flexible skin around the neck of sheep or cattle
(Wenzlawowicz and Holleben, 2007).
As for the painless lie, will you settle for EEG?
Measurement of the electrical activity of the brain to assess noxious stimuli has been described in chapter 2.6.2. Recent advancements in electrophysiology have allowed quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in response to painful/noxious sensory input, allowing the experience of pain to be more precisely assessed in humans and animals. This methodology has been applied to the question of pain during slaughter of calves by ventral-neck incision. In a series of experiments the results showed clear evidence for the first time that the act of slaughter by ventral-neck incision is associated with noxious stimulation that would be expected to be perceived as painful in the period between the incision and loss of consciousness (Mellor et al., 2009). First the use of changes in the EEG
power spectral and a minimal anaesthesia model was validated for the assessment of noxious
sensory input using amputation dehorning as a noxous stimulus (Gibson et al., 2007). Then
the model was used to investigate the impact of ventral-neck incision without prior stunning (Gibson et al., 2009b). The results demonstrated that ventral neck incision produced changes
in the EEG indicating that it was a noxious stimulus and therefore could be perceived as painful in conscious animals. This was then confirmed in the second study addressing the
question whether the EEG responses after ventral neck incision were due primarily to the
cutting of neck tissues or to interruption of blood flow to and from the brain. The results demonstrated that the predominant noxious stimulus was cause by the transection of neck tissue not the loss of blood flow to and from the brain (Gibson et al., 2009a). In sheep there is
no direct EEG data that demonstrates pain in response to the cut, however based on the physiological similarities between sheep and cattle, it stands to reason that the neck cut in non stunned sheep will cause pain (Hemsworth et al., 2009).
The animal cruelty people are right on this one. This is why we fully stun.
Nerves severed during the neck cut have been described by Gregory (2004, page 96) to be able to proceed signals for up to 4 seconds.
A lifetime in neuroscience. The time dilation of the stress alone would make it seem like five minutes.
Direct activation of neurones during transection of
the nerve results in an intense but brief injury discharge in the afferent nerves. The overall
effect is likely to be a sense of shock, comparable to an electric shock.
Uhuh…. convenient metaphor.
Subsequently, undamaged nerve endings and also nociceptors in the neck wound respond if stimulated or disturbed especially from cold drafts and mechanical effects depending on the way the wound is managed before consciousness will be lost (Gregory, 2005b; Gregory, 2004). Nerve
conduction velocities ensure that activation of brain centres following major cutting injury occurs within milliseconds. Therefore, the potential experience of pain is directly relevant to
the events following the neck cut (Hemsworth et al., 2009).
During the Dialrel spot visits even under apparently optimum conditions, reactions to the cut as vocalising or exhaling (as long as the trachea was intact), retracting movements, struggling or shivering have been found especially in cattle during Halal and Shechita slaughter without stunning in both turning pens and upright systems. Reactions in sheep have been observed as
struggling directly after the cut but also shivering. Reactions of poultry have been retraction movements and wing flapping.
You can’t pretend it’s better.
In conclusion it can be stated with the utmost probability that animals feel pain during the throat cut without prior stunning. Whereas the actual cut itself can only be evaluated using behavioural signs, questions remain about standardisation of cutting techniques. Because in all probability animals are able to experience pain during and after the cut, the question of duration of consciousness is very important. This applies as well for a smooth cut performed
by a skilled operator.
Cut, singular? Up to sixty!
Risk factors for increased pain include increased number of changes of direction of the cut, increased number of cuts, wound manipulation (e.g. second cut), insufficient length of the blade, increased cutting time, a blunt blade, nicks on the blade, increased diameter of the neck, increased flexibility of the skin due to insufficient tension of the neck tissue during the cut, thick wool or coat and excitable animals.
Is there such a thing as a non-excitable animal?
Section 4.1.2 goes into loss of consciousness.
It is also possible that animals regain consciousness during bleeding (see chapter 2.8 and also below). The duration of overall consciousness is of particular importance
I’ll stop here, you get the gist.
I’m too disgusted.
some bonus Halal Tufano GIFs/vids, I have the video footage but can’t upload it here on this site.
“happy”? lying or deceiving?
Halal is also cheaper to produce because it’s so inhumane and has fewer equipment requirements.
I know film people and they send me videos, GIFs and stuff. The irony of those two clips together with the same Old Hollywood aspect ratio was amazing.
Edit: They told me about this …thing and uploaded it for me, pasting links, hope this works. We pass around videos like this all the time and have a right good laugh about it so ignore the count. That was us before this post went live. He is Halal Tufano now.
You could probably edit some hideously gory Halal thing between these clips but I’ll spare you,
Shills, shills everywhere.
They also recently sent me this. If it looks like something Hollywood would produce, that’s because it is.
Costing up to £100,000 for an academic year, the Institut auf dem Rosenberg is more than twice as expensive as Eton college and educates the offspring of some of the wealthiest people in the world. Most of whom, it turns out, will be taught by teachers who trained in the cash-strapped classrooms of UK state schools.
Why they can’t talk about classism.
Those teachers who find themselves in Rosenberg’s five-star setting are a small subset of the thousands leaving their students in Oldham and Lewisham, Liverpool and Leicester, and heading for Switzerland, China, Canada, Dubai, Australia, Thailand, Mexico, Nepal and numerous other international education destinations.
The 230 pupils of more than 40 different nationalities are just back after their half-term break – the younger children are cute and chatty, while the older pupils sidle by with barely a glance.
The multiculturalism starts early so you don’t know anything else.
The benefits include small classes, capacity to save, private healthcare, free flights home and no Ofsted
No anal sex classes in Year 1? Bigots.
The school is discreet about alumni – apart from the Mexican Nobel laureate Mario J Molina, after whom the school’s science centre is named – but it is happy for you to know it includes European royalty and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs.
Degeneracy for thee but not for me.
Besides, here there’s less time spent managing behaviour and more time doing what teachers love – teaching their subject. At home, he says, his work was results- and Ofsted-driven. Here he feels he can be more creative, more independent. “In the UK you are constantly having to report to certain people about certain things. Here you are trusted to do what you think is best for the student.”
Socialist complains about socialism.
Can we rescind their citizenship? We trained them up and they fled.
Eilish McGrath is head of social studies at Rosenberg and echoes McCarron’s sentiments. She began her teaching career at Hathershaw college in Oldham, a comprehensive with a large number of disadvantaged pupils, followed by a sixth-form college in Macclesfield. She enjoyed the work, but having spent much of her childhood in the Middle East and Asia, she moved to Dubai, where she taught at Repton school, one of a growing number of British independent schools that are opening international branches overseas.
They not only don’t care about you, they fund and train up your invaders.
Often exhausted by their experiences in the UK, they complain of excessive workload, stress, a lack of work-life balance, funding cuts, a dread of Ofsted, an obsession with paperwork, accountability measures, poor behaviour, children bringing weapons to school, high staff turnover … the list goes on.
The benefits of working abroad, they say, don’t just include sunshine, free accommodation and tax-free earnings, but small classes, more resources, better work-life balance, freedom to travel, capacity to save, private healthcare, free flights home and no Ofsted. Their strength of feeling is eye-opening. “I would burn in hell before returning to teach in an English school,” says one teacher who moved to the Netherlands. “Teaching in the UK is exhausting,” says a secondary school art and design teacher who moved to an international school in Thailand.
Yeah can we just trap these people there and wait for the next war or plague?
Though few of the teachers who contact us are motivated by money, one 33-year-old left her primary school in Tower Hamlets, east London, for an international school in Yangon in Myanmar because she couldn’t make enough money to survive in London. Now she earns £5,000 more, plus a yearly bonus, in a package topped off with free accommodation, flights and medical insurance. “Working conditions are better, with sizes that are half of a UK class. It would be insane for me to return to the UK.”
Can we make that official?
Fifth columnists, they vote in our ruin and replacement then skip the country.
Janet Birch, a science teacher, left the UK for Two Boats, the government school on Ascension Island, a British Overseas Territory in the south Atlantic. In her north London secondary, she felt that the workload was excessive, pupils were poorly behaved, resources were tight and the job was stressful. “I could be earning more in England but I would not be able to save as much,” she says. She described her new situation: “The pupils are delightful, the classes are small, resources are plentiful, workload is reasonable, staff work well together.” Island life suits her – she dives, walks and is a projectionist for the local cinema.
The alarm bells have been ringing for some time about the exodus from our classrooms. One poll by the National Education Union (NEU) this year found that one in five teachers (18%) expects to quit in less than two years, and two in five want to quit in the next five – most blame “out of control” workload pressures and excessive accountability.
“We know that teachers have a strong social mission and they want to make the world a better place, and work with disadvantaged children,” says Mary Bousted, joint general secretary of the NEU. “But the reality is we are making teaching just too hard to do.”
It’s babysitting! They do nothing!
They get solid months off per year.
When these people come back and bitch about state pensions, remember this.
Louise Sturt, an English teacher with 25 years experience in the state sector in England, would agree. She finally quit her comprehensive near Bristol after years of funding cuts, restructuring and deteriorating behaviour.
“dogwhistles” aplenty in this article
they know, they know what the low iq nations are like they just want to be somewhere else when the riots happen to you
Staff numbers had been reduced dramatically, she says. She now works at the private Dubai English Speaking college. “We’ve got a nice place to live. We’ve got sunny days every day. It feels like an adventure.” After so many years in state education, she feels sad she has finally “gone over to the other side. I would go back to it. There are not that many people I speak to who would.”
On the other side of the planet, Katy Bull is thriving in her role as head of kindergarten in a small international school in Tequisquiapan, a popular tourist town in central Mexico. “I remember spending weekends in the UK sat inside planning, marking, assessing, worrying … Now I actually have a life. I would still say I work extremely hard, but extremely hard on the things that count. I feel intrinsically motivated to be an outstanding teacher, and not because Ofsted inspectors are pressuring me.”
Omg you big meanie Ofsted expecting them to jump through your hoops for a wage.
[Ofsted are dodgy, pedo-pushing and do fake things in their documents and lie to cover up for child abuse though.]
Modern foreign language teacher Mary McCormack, who quit her job at a school in Wolverhampton for Canada, has similar memories of weekends and “the piles of books that needed to be corrected every three weeks – robbing me of my Sundays”.
You got summers and other holidays off but you’re not a farmer, you don’t need summers off.
And in Quebec? “Little to no lesson observations. Complete trust as a professional. I am paid more, but the high taxes mean that my take-home is slightly less than what it would be in the UK. This being said, I would never consider coming back to a British classroom.”
Could demographics have anything to do with that?
In the run-up to a general election in which education is likely to be a key battleground, all parties have pledged more money for schools. The Tories have promised increased starting salaries for teachers of £30,000, while Labour pledged an end to high-stakes school inspections, but whether any of it is enough to stem the exodus of teachers remains to be seen.
Ofsted has lied about child abuse and covered it up, what stakes?
They have a Common Purpose, you could say.
Prof John Howson, an authority on the labour market for teachers, says it is classroom teachers with between five and seven years’ experience that are being lost in greater numbers than ever – the very people who should be moving into middle leadership positions. And while once upon a time they might have gone abroad to work in the international sector temporarily, Howson fears these days they may prefer what they find overseas and not return.
A capitalist system?
What’s more, a significant increase in the number of secondary school pupils is projected over the next few years.
with sub-replacement native birth rate, no prizes for guessing why they fled
This means we will need more teachers, not fewer, just at the time the international schools market is booming and will be trying to lure British teachers in ever greater numbers to fill its classrooms overseas. According to the Council of British International Schools, the sector will require up to 230,000 more teachers to meet staffing needs over the next 10 years. “I fear that we may have to go looking elsewhere around the world for teachers to come and work here,” says Howson.
the solution to problems caused by Third World immigration – more Third World immigration!
That’s Owen Jones tier reasoning.
The champagne socialists could just be banned from leaving or coming back. That’s the solution.
This is also why they want open borders. They can afford to run from the diversity, you can’t!
In Switzerland, McGrath contemplates a different future, away from the exclusive surroundings of the Institut auf dem Rosenberg, back to her classroom in Oldham. “Would I go back and teach in the UK?” She sits back and reflects. “When I worked in Oldham, I really liked the challenges of the students I was working with. Now working here, I would find it very hard to go back.”
Racist bigot. Obviously.
Teachers are just the new, secular missionaries, utterly useless people who should be shipped off abroad and never let back in. We used to let our rabbits go off to Africa, get malaria and die there. That was a smarter system.
The person who solves the problem of the poor behaviour of the 5% of pupils, solves the recruitment crisis.
IQ is mostly genetic, just deport them and the family.
I’d have thought Guardian folk would detest schools like Rosenberg. And this from the paper that rails against private education. By all means point out the inadequacies of Ofsted etc but giving voice to Guardian reading teachers who have left UK comprehensives to teach at private schools abroad smacks of hypocrisy. You would also do well to focus some of your journalistic energies to the problems of pupil behaviour – mentioned here by several teachers.
My word, the hostility below the line here is quite something.
How dare British teachers decide to leave behind their crumbling, underfunded schools, excessive workload, undisciplined kids (discipline starts at home, folks, whether you want to accept that or not), crap salaries, crippling bureaucracy and being used as a political football, in order to go elsewhere to pursue the profession that they actually signed up to do?
Do not pity these people whatever happens to them.
This is another negative to our short term thinking, we use student loans to take the expansion of the universities in this country of our government books but this just means that graduates have another incentive to leave.
as long as they can’t vote or come back when SHTF with exotic diseases in their system then fine
Asia has a syphilis problem and have you read the fatal symptoms of that one? All it takes is one set of antibiotics to fail, like super gonorrhea beforehand.
Why come back when staying away means that in a few years time the taxpayer will pay off your student loan instead?
It’s cute they think they’ll be allowed back to sponge off the pension system after paying no taxes.