Gen Y women more likely to cheat, slightly

Apparently?

We have a single lying chart, people. A single, lying chart. The Y-axis tops out at 30%.

Why Are Millennial Women Cheating More Than Men?



11% female, 10% male.
Wow, huge. LOL

Nah jk, it’s well within the error rate. Logically, if they’re all straight and fucking one another, it’d have to be.

Let’s pick this apart.

Who do they want to distrust whom?

Demographically, who is that?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/millennials-most-racially-diverse-generation-u-s-history-n46361
“the most racially diverse generation in U.S. history. About 43 percent are non-white”

Yup, that’ll do it. Especially when certain demos like the mixed and Hispanic are pushed to marry by relatives.

Back to top article:
“Joan says she was raised according to strict gender norms. “I grew up in the Philippines, a super conservative Catholic country, where cheating was a big no-no for women,” she explains. “You’re supposed to just accept your lot in life, but cheating in men is excused and often encouraged.” She can see a marked difference in the views of women her age compared to those her mother’s age. “Millennials are both way more jaded and way more chill than the previous generation,” she muses.”

How to spot anti-natal propaganda, MGTOW bait?

Note the use of white names, when sexual behaviour is best predicted along racial lines and Gen Y is heavily non-white, in America.
Men are meant to set the standards. What men do, women follow.

Whatever they do.

Monkey see, monkey do, morally.

Do I like this? No. Is it true? Yes. Morally, women are total sheep.

Anything men do, a sizeable number of lemmings with tits shall pursue too.

It’s the conscientious conformity.

“Relationships in general are different [in our generation],” Joan continues. “There seems to be more of a spectrum in how people date, which leads to all sorts of gray areas and wiggle room.

Hey, the PUAs wanted that ambiguity, they got it.

“While most of the women I speak to cheated while in ostensibly monogamous relationships — not a particularly noble challenge to institutional monogamy, they admit — some have now moved on to open or poly arrangements.

The Jews of Silicon Valley (Jews are very loose) push polygamy and polyandry follows, especially among non-white women.
You can tell this is true because they haven’t reported the key demographics – race and religion.

They want you to assume American here = white and Christian, because the story is negative.

Among more white age groups, women are in fact more faithful.

“Without fail, women told me that the men they cheated on were disappointing partners who weren’t meeting their relationship needs.”

No such thing as a ‘partner’. That’s PC language.

The need to have a husband and protector. They never ask about this need.
aka Men who won’t marry get no loyalty. You can’t commit adultery (the only actual, real ‘cheating’) on someone who isn’t your spouse. They didn’t say the vows! What they cheatin’ on?! Exactly? Instagram photo sanctity?!!

Nobody mentions this, for narrative. They’re interviewing an unmarried ‘cheat’ for that quote – fuck all to do with this ‘survey’ which I’m sure was conducted out of an urban area, right?

And don’t ask her what this “need” was in this unmarried woman to feel secure.

Ask these questions.

I never felt guilty,” Sophie says firmly. “All of my partners were people I took care of in the ways you always take care of men: emotionally, sometimes financially and dealing with untreated mental illness.”

So she was acting as a support, a wife.

In return, she got nothing. Worse, drained emotionally, financially and psychologically (dealing with crazies is maddening).
No ring to boot, she moved on. That’s sane. Nobody says anything, I’m not American so I don’t feel threatened in the least by honesty.

If he crazy, emotionally immature and exhibits psychopathic parasitism: LEAVE. That isn’t a MAN.

It’s like the unholy trio of hell naw. Those people shouldn’t even be dating (especially the emotional immaturity part).

Why are American men like this now, is a damn better question. They should be taking care of the woman, no wonder they bolt, the gender roles are backwards!

No woman wants to be your adult caretaker Peter Pan, even your own Mommy.

That’s how Psycho happened. These ‘men’ are acting like they’re disabled, WTF.

Literally no woman wants an adult baby. No one respects that.

All women to the manchild:

You cannot raise children without a husband, an actual man.

Laziness ain’t a disability. 

If American men reject their gender role, women abandon theirs. Hardly a choice.

“I didn’t really trust or respect men deeply enough anyway.”

Were you listening?

BOOM. Right there. Trust, then respect. We instinctively cannot trust a man who is inadequate on all cylinders of his gender role. Women are jaded because the men are soft.

What have they earned, by their actions? What masculinity is there to trust, exactly?

Women don’t respect sluts, either.
Women respect patriarchs, married and loyal husbands.
They’re conflating stats of adulterers (married) to the weasel word cheats – on what? They’re unmarried.

The faux confusion of “cheating” with “adultery” is a false equivalence, mind you.

Adultery in this survey hugely the lowest among wives of WW2 soldiers. No connection to the death of masculinity, obviously.

When are we bringing back stoning for adultery? Both guilty parties, full Bible!

An END to cucking!

Misogynists are just bitchy entitled brats

They act like a bitchy woman. They do not act straight.

e.g. As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality.

Respectful to friends and superiors, never to ugly women or inferiors. Very antisocial personality.

e.g. He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.

Narc triangulation, men say he’s good, women say he’s bad. Narc sucks up attention.

r-types, like Labour pitting Muslims against Christians. Whoever wins, will vote for Labour.

“He’s such a nice guy” – red flag, nice to men = evil to women. Men are meant to compete.

It’s a perversion of gender role.

A guy like that tried ignoring me once, thinking I’d decided to go out with him after being pressured. (nope) Treat them mean and all. Like I said, “didn’t even notice”. Really, actually, didn’t. Since he was playing the female role, why would I? I’m not the man.

If I were a dyke, I still wouldn’t notice him, a male. It STILL makes no sense, to this day.

Answers on a postcard. If they liked ‘strong independent (manly) women’, one keyword there is independent.

He threw a tantrum about me ‘missing him’ (almost stranger) and it being a ‘test’ (not a single date) and stomped off, half-expecting me to chase him. It was comical. His dick was not valuable. Dick is not a rare commodity. Turned out to be a nutjob. Shocker. I’d actually felt better when he wasn’t around, this is why they can’t be the woman.

They treat women mean and act like women (schoolgirls who won’t talk to you), then complain when the woman leaves. They believe affection must be tinged with abuse. Trauma bonds formed by control and gaslighting aren’t love, stupid bitches. Any secure person will run for the hills over broken glass.

“Nice Guy” – repressed rage (usually left-wing, white guilt and Asian fetish) and kinda gay.

An Asian Nice Guy would have guilt with a White fetish, Anglo culture obsession (opposite of weeb).

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

It’s a defense mechanism from narc inferiority/superiority complex and self-loathing but mostly a blind spot, e.g.

  1. He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
  2. He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
  3. He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
  4. On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
  5. He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
  6. He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

If that all sounds borderline to you, yes, a lot of misogynists are undiagnosed male borderlines.

3. is a psychopath, as is 5 and 6.

Huge hypocrites, project women as doing all of those. Implying men are impossible candidates.

Lower IQ, since misogyny is an indicator of inferiority. Defense in defense mechanism avoids this fact.

Falsely claim men are intelligent despite huge number of retards.

Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them.

Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.

Idiots. Defective brains.

The wounded masculine. Sadism. A woman who spots them (empath) and so, isn’t hurt, becomes a ‘bitch’. He was the one bitching, trying to wound her. Not wounding her wounds his ego, narcissism 101.

Real men don’t treat the weaker sex like crap, they have a duty. Women need men and men need women, emotionally.

Video: 10 arguments against pre-marital sex

or fornication, if you dislike PC terms.

Pleasantly surprised by this logic.

Yes, promiscuity x divorce risk must be studied more, actually. Much more. One major issue mathematically is how few promiscuous marry AT ALL to even qualify for the studies so marital rate too (since that’s important information for people). Then psychological issues round out the methodology for the ones that predispose to those behaviors in the first place (not a free choice, a compulsion) and muddy the waters in the non-pathological population (i.e. not personality disorders).

It seems to operate by weakening pair bonds until the person is incapable of making them.

I know AC would agree with me that an amygdala atrophy study in the promiscuous and also divorced groups would be illuminating. Imagine if you can check divorce risk with a brain scan before marriage!

And once developed, can it ever shrink or is gain permanent?

comment

This is an old truth that has been only relatively recently abandoned. The reasons for all Christian principles are entirely practical. There is a saying ‘you are not punished for your sins, but by them

The big lie spoken by manwhores in particular is that ruining themselves emotionally (and physically) will make them better husbands for the right woman. The feminists carbon copied that rationalization, it’s still bullshit. How does adding psychological issues make you better in any way? And why should your spouse have to clean up the messes left by a trail of people who hurt you? And if you were remorseless and mistreated, abandoned them, what’s to stop you doing it to your spouse? Why reward that with love and fidelity?

Some people are incapable of loving and therefore don’t deserve to be loved.

Unequal yokes are abusive.

In romantic/sexual relationships, what doesn’t kill you makes you weaker.

“Muh Experience” is the idiot’s way of claiming that learning everything wrong will make them right. It’s insanity. This isn’t a pop quiz you can redo, it’s your life; it isn’t a game you can respawn into ad nauseum, you are learning patterns and reactions and if they don’t work, you’re far, far worse off than the person with NO “experience” – this is Dunning-Kruger.

Experience of failure means you’re wrong. You’re the common denominator.

The definition of insanity is the man who fucks around and wonders why he can’t find marriage material.

Hook-up culture has trained men into being useless husbands, they have the opposite required qualities.

To put it crassly, they’re saying “I shit in the pool, why is the water brown?”

Where have all the good women gone? Well, how many women have you slept with? Subtract those from the communal pool. Now extrapolate.

No, you can’t Have It All. You never could, it was a Boomer marketing gimmick. But the economy (and GDP) make more money from cads than dads. The politicians are playing them. They don’t care about you. They don’t care if you’re a genetic dead-end.

These useful idiots would literally argue the man who fucks 100 women and finds no love (0/100) is better husband material than a man who fucked zero women and also found no love yet, the unproven quantity. Narcissists lie.

Lust doesn’t lead to love, it leads to personal disgust. Hollywood lied so you’d sell your soul buying their stuff to fill the emptiness of your single life. They can’t admit it without the self-loathing attacking them so they blame the “thots” in standard projection and denial of agency. If you’re so easily led into temptation, you’re too weak to call yourself a man.

If you treat your love life like a game, women will see you as a joke.

Men rejecting masculinity

Alt title: men rejecting their gender role (then blaming women).
https://www.mercatornet.com/above/view/apatheism-is-more-damaging-to-christianity-than-atheism-and-antitheism/21642

“More nuanced and incisive rebuttals, such as Edward Feser’s The Last Superstition and David Bentley Hart’s Atheist Delusions, somehow never quite achieved the same recognition.”

cabal

“The questions and debates engaged in by the new atheists were often reductive, emotionalized and glib, but one does have to grant that they at least tackled the great questions of faith in their way.”

All redditfags do is strawman and pretend to be House on social questions while their own lives are miserable bachelorhoods full of porn and video games. It’s like church ladies self-congratulating.

Yeah, in spite of mathematical certainty, they’re all 130+ and can’t spell or compose a sentence for shit. O.K.

The only way they feel good about themselves is crusaderism, finding a “sinner” and making them feel bad or stressed e.g. Christians.

“Its supporters soon tired of tedious and repetitive debates,

with their navel

and they began to argue with each other about social justice and political correctness.”

And failed, clue.

Nothing they say is original. They’re multicultural monstrosities.

“The answer lies in the grey zone between believers and atheists.

no?

If you want to find the real wolf steering sheep away from the flock, look not to fedora-bedecked atheists, but to your average apatheist.”

No, hedonist. They pay lip service to virtue to continue a life of vice, massive cognitive dissonance.
You are not special, broflakes. This is not a special thing worthy of a snowflake term.
e.g. they will say all men should be married, and refuse to get married. Idiots.
They will say all men do better in the military and call the draft “sexist” (like evolution didn’t happen).
Women are weak but should magically overpower any male attacker with kung fu grip (but hitting a man is sexist).
They will know about atheist sub-fertility and refuse to be religious because they think it’s beneath them, a status signal, and again, they’re avoiding patriarchal standards i.e. no manwhoring, no carousing, no drugs, no lechery, actual standards of historical masculine virtue.
They don’t want to grow up or can’t (emotionally regressed). Peter Pan spent all his time “having fun” and dodging responsibility.
The idea of being a gentleman or “respectable” is something they dismiss out of hand with another mis-label, cuck.
No, a cuck is someone who rejects tradition and history in their own life while verbally going on (and on and on…) about its importance, they’re cuckservatives hoping to freeload off the backs of real men’s hard work. For thee but not for me. They’re worthless humans, if they won’t contribute they should emigrate. They’d actually take a class on Penis Studies (Man Studies) because they’re so mind-numbingly boring (predictable, all on the same diet, same clothes, same haircut, same reading material across borders, like a cult of dull) and lacking in individuality.

They’ll say men should be providers – and refuse to provide even for themselves (a mantrum) and worse, defend deadbeats!
Cowardly r-types.

“It’s okay when we do it” hypocrites. They’re socialists who self-loathe in different ways. An abortion clinic on every corner and whore pills in every 13yo girl’s hands would be alright by them! Moral relativists. “Social liberal, economic conservative” cucks. All the gibs, as long as someone else pays.

You can only strike from your gender role if you were competent enough to have ever achieved it.

They reject their gender role, like male SJWs, in favour of materalism, atheistic hedonism (acting like an animal). It’s the exact same thing.
In their own ideal society, they’d be rejects!
Nihilism in the pomo sense of the word is the belief system of losers, it’s their cover for postmodernism while pretending to be oh-so different (special) from the SJWs (narcissism of small differences).
Even this article’s like “this is a new and special thing”.
No? It’s just that we notice because dueling is illegal (otherwise their lip would get them shot by a real man) and they can’t be cannon fodder without an overt war. This is what happens in the dysgenic situation when you let the Low IQ males with delusions of superiority (a self-proclaimed penis pass, if you will, on all sin) run their whining mouth about how, in the most spoiled society ever, they’re still abject failures! Oh, poor baby in your air conditioned palace on welfare! It must be so hard!
Their failure isn’t society’s fault, it’s a character fault and on the contrary, the ones bitching online are exclusively reared in the middle-class (they had advantages).

They have no excuse.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/19/middle-class-white-male-memes/

If a meme about a spoiled suburbanite Prince stereotype offends you…. it should.

Shame is GOOD.

Their slide down the social mobility scale is a sign the system works. You aren’t entitled to a better life than your parents unless you work at least as hard (complaining isn’t work).

I’d know.

9/10 they’re actually nagging. But they do nothing themselves. Only nag. We have male shrews! They expect the rest of us will step in like their helicopter parents. You’re an adult, we owe you nothing.

The Boomers are right about the entitled ones. It just happens to be the hippy kids.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/the-anti-spanking-initiative-is-r-selected/

Nagging only works if you’re bound i.e. parents, marriage. Nagging society doesn’t wash and given the advantages men have on many levels (that they deny “male privilege is a myth” when they seek to evade responsibility or champion with hyperbole “men are superior biologically” to signal, both when it’s convenient, like we don’t notice), they don’t have an excuse that blames women e.g. when boys lose out on math tests and other schoolwork, it’s because they study less around the time they discover porn. Asians can’t watch that stuff all day, look at their grades, it isn’t “all men”, it’s all degenerate men who make poor lifestyle choices. So they want a meritocratic system – but only when it leads to positive outcomes for themselves (liars).

If someone works harder than you, they deserve to beat you! Add up hours studied and you’ll find female (and male) conscientiousness isn’t bias, they activate with their IQ the traits which help them. The guy or girl “winging it” the night before deserves to fail*. Low IQ don’t have the IQ to know what they’re NOT doing! That isn’t everyone else’s fault! If there are systemic forces against men in some fields, the same must be true of women in other fields because that is how systems work, ya dummies!

Otherwise it’s like saying there’s north without south or taste without those tacky cheese squares at the other end of the spectrum. Logic is consistent! Smart men address the topic of stupid men – until they’re shouted down as “sexist” (???), like smart women.

It just so happens by nature that there are more lazy men! So yeah, they fail! Confound!

You cannot ignore the left half of the bell curve, men overpopulate it!

They’ve simply never survived in these numbers before because responsibility is the new leprosy in a decadent West. It makes a lot of sense actually. No prior society (that didn’t collapse) ever had to tolerate this much stupid and it shows.

If we live in clown world, send in the clowns…

War is like sexual selection, it’s a good thing that keeps the bad genes down. The modern world is like adding shit to the pool so it doesn’t feel excluded.
It turns out you don’t need to sterilize irresponsible people, just give them a free sex doll on condition they never have children (or they’d be aborted). We could solve this in two generations if we stopped listening to their “feelings” (they don’t have feelings, relativists, they only ramble and screech).

Seriously, hand them sexbots on condition of no kids to inflict on the future world (and no sex crimes, because apparently their hand wasn’t as big as their ego). They’re genetic suicides anyway, that or move them (could be cheaper) to a literal Pleasure Island with no internet (no corrupting the outside world) and they can never leave (I figured Westworld was about this, a brothel prison with no victims, would’ve been cooler). They’d OD in about a week without the nanny state. Actually, a literal death camp could work very simply: press lever 1 for food or 2 for heroin. Technically, it’s suicide. Dummies are predictably hedonic.

*They’ve been told it’s important for literally over a decade. You can lead a horse to water. Education is wasted on the lazy and stupid, and they’re the same people. That’s Dunning-Kruger. They’re blind to what they’re missing because they’re missing it!

They cannot see past their ego to anything, including Pascal’s Wager. Again, deny and dismiss, typical cuck.
The destructive person (antisocial to society) telling you you deserve to be destroyed (like an SJW) because society sucks unless it’s sucking them off (but it isn’t their job to fix it?)… boys who weren’t raised with real discipline have no shame (sociopath trait). They’ve been allowed to get away with ruining themselves and remaining psychologically as teenagers.

It’s just the dysgenic men too proud to become blatant SJWs. 

Actually worse than SJWs, wow. They’d sell their grandma for a porn star.

You can’t sympathize with people who hate you and your people.
There’s the obvious traitor and the sneaky little shits who under-mine attempts to make things better for everyone because the gap to their own life would become greater. Fifth Column is worse.

Incels are bachelors

Single, unmarried. It’s their choice.

This is normal. This is the historical norm. If you don’t marry, you have no right to sex ever.
If you want to be a degenerate, you shouldn’t expect society to approve or support you in it.

Why must I keep explaining this to dopey Americans? That is what marriage means. It’s a sexual bond enshrined in law for the protection of both parties, although we should bring back other, older laws to protect it further e.g. false light, breach of promise, criminal conversation, alienation of affections, abandonment charges.

You could get an arranged marriage to a desperate third world woman or save up and pay for it. You do not, so you don’t really want the sex. Nobody is entitled to sex, and that’s one of the reasons birth control shouldn’t be supported by taxpayers. Some societies pay for hookers for the disabled, it’s absurd. Maybe you could move there and feign a spinal injury. Instead of nagging like a petulant child that no woman wants to go near you, you could try to grow up. It isn’t about the sex? Nobody in this life can demand love and affection from anyone else. Coincidentally, you’re often the same group moaning that feminists must earn respect. Everyone must, including you. If nobody respects or likes you, you can’t force it and have only yourselves to blame. Why didn’t your incompetent parents tell you this?

There’s a simple way to relieve yourself but if you’re porn addicted that’s a separate issue and real sex between people who like one another isn’t anything like porn, you’ve been training your brains wrong.

Other humans do not have a right to consent unless they also have a right to reject. It’s part of freedom of association, it isn’t even sexual. Hollywood tells you everyone else is having sex. No and it’s envious to resent the world for this mistaken perception, simply look up life partner count stats and drop it a few points for lying. All women are not hookers and even hookers where they exist are not free. Stop being so entitled. You’re not entitled to date a fat woman and they’re not entitled to you either. Without this element of personal choice and mutual exchange, there is no relationship.

You wanted to be single. Lone wolves don’t get laid. Pick up a book on it. You chose the life. It’s defined by celibacy. Celibacy is the proper term for what you are if you don’t ‘get laid’, what are you? A tea tray?! Your personal issues with horniness require professional intervention when it becomes a warped identity and net obsession. Get your hormones checked at least. What you urge has nothing to do with sexual status, show me that documentation to prove otherwise. The ‘sowing your wild oats’ thing is another internet myth shared by sad men grunting into cameras about how the whole world hates them but owes them… doesn’t it have that right to dislike them? What are you adding to it? You have all this opportunity and you’re no better than the Muh Dick rapefugees.

Entitlement is ugly in both sexes. You don’t deserve jack shit. You never did.

Ask yourself, how crazy do you sound like, trying to insist on something nobody can force?

There is no Affirmative Action for sex, you’re a desperate degenerate. h/t uncabob for pointing out that’s exactly what they want, state-sponsored fuckathons. You have two hands.
Manwhores aren’t better than you either, they just like to tell you that. It’s a lie.

Source: The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement

As for the genetic dregs, those existed in every society. Why should they breed if nobody wants them? Sexual selection is an evolutionary pressure test, it exists for the collective good of all. You couldn’t impress those women’s families either, so what exactly are you advocating? Bride kidnapping?

Men with social problems make terrible fathers if they did breed, those issues are more common in men.

Monogamous societies still have rites of passage and rules of courtship to prove you earn a wife and are capable of supporting a household as its head.

https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success

You don’t want to do that? You don’t want to grow up. We don’t see 13-year old boys demanding free copies of Hustler because they have ‘urges’ so obviously, society must tend to them.

The standards of humanity in all time periods won’t be dropped for your magical snowflake American fatasses.

Be a man and you will attract a woman.

Not that you should really care about such an arbitrary definition of a rite of passage as sex. Does a dog become a man after it ‘bangs’? Or is this a red herring, a distraction from bigger crises and problems like a good job or buying a house? Is a virgin unworthy of respect if they do good in the world, compared to a Kardashian? You should be against virgin shaming, not self loathing.

Drop the bitchy personality, it doesn’t even get women ‘laid’ and to be honest, it’s effeminate, gay men do it.
Do straight women want teh gays? No. Not the sane ones, at least.

Don’t be this guy.

They’re not even good friends. Women get the creepy friend pretenders all the time, some are tough to spot and assume their ‘trick’ of being a totally different person will magically make you grow sexual feelings for someone acting about twelve. It’s the sneaky fucker strategy in humans and unlike in fish, it doesn’t work.

It isn’t the fault of half the world’s population if you aren’t desirable. If you were desirable, you still wouldn’t be entitled to a sex buffet. If kings have to ask consent, you have to take No for an answer too.

Cut out the entitlement, you’re fucking pathetic. Actual men with accomplishments would agree. Stop wasting your life being a bitch or go gay, they’re never short on options.

You aren’t married? Why should anyone sleep with you? …. Why.
You hate marriage, kids, women in general? Don’t be shocked if we can sense this and run like the human plague you are. Don’t base your life on something dissolute and meaningless as orgasms.

Video: The sorrow of the man-child

This guy is legit.

Zizek is a troll.

From Muh Future post

Boys cannot become men without women. It’s the missing puzzle piece. Insulting women is making your situation worse, the enemy wants you to be anti-women and anti-natal (they’re the same thing).

Their elders won’t let them grow up.

Hmm.

familiar

http://www.apa.org/monitor/jun06/emerging.aspx

29 year olds being infantilised?

Are you fucking kidding?

Fun fact: retardé means delayed.

Signs of an Emotionally Immature Adult

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-superhuman-mind/201611/10-signs-emotionally-immature-adult

Little Prince (or Princess) Syndrome, when it occurs in adulthood, is also known as Peter Pan Syndrome.”
Little Prince (or Princess) Syndrome is related to, but not identical to, Emperor Syndrome, a term is primarily used to describe Chinese boys with no siblings who behave like little tyrants.”

Unfair, Princess Syndrome is more common with the Chinese women at present. You don’t see Chinese men giggling and running round big Chanel stores with their friends on Daddy’s credit card.

“Little Princes and Princesses, as I define them, are grown men or women who act as if they are selfish children, narcissistic teenagers, or irresponsible young adults, and feel entitled to behave as they see fit. Following are 10 traits typical of someone living with Little Prince or Princess Syndrome. (For simplicity’s sake, I use the term Little Prince below, and refer to the role of mothers, not father, but the signs are applicable to all genders.)”

A selection;

He acts like a child, a teenager, or a person who is much younger than he is. He might throw temper tantrums or party all night with people 10 years younger than him.

He acts as if women should serve him. He expects to be taken care of and be pampered on demand. He will happily take but never give.

He cannot maintain a long-term, stable romantic relationship. Former partners end up becoming his enemies or new playmates.

He is commitment-phobic in nearly all areas of life—despite having a needy attachment style. It can take him six months to commit to buying a new sofa.

I have seen that.
My words-
“It’s a sofa, you can dump it.”

They see their possessions as an extension of them.
Possessions include people.

If you don’t make them look good, you’re gone.
The excuse is usually pleasing others, so they also look good to you. B.S.

Btw, Asians invented ghosting. You made less money? You missed a promotion? They forget to send you a dinner party invite. It makes you wonder if they’re capable of the friendship thing with one another too.

He is often passive-aggressive, meaning he has a tendency to engage in an indirect expression of hostility through acts such as subtle insults, sullen behavior, stubbornness, or a deliberate failure to accomplish required tasks.

They are not subtle.
Have you ever met a subtle man?… I rest my case.

He is a narcissist or exhibits a childish selfishness. If something is even mildly inconvenient, he will resist doing it.

Emotional child.

He rarely thinks anything is his fault. He blames everyone around him for everything that goes wrong in his life—even his mother if he can’t find another scapegoat.”

Victim blaming, victim mentality… tendency to complain about victim culture because they think they’re entitled to that pity, not that it’s wrong. Whiny and lots of nagging, like an old woman.

If you find this useful, you might find these too.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/is-america/201601/con-artists-and-their-marks

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-flux/201610/9-classic-traits-manipulative-people

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201609/meet-the-real-narcissists-theyre-not-what-you-think
“For example, he suggests, some narcissists can be of the “communal” variety and actually devote their lives to helping others. They might even agree with such statements as “I’m the most helpful person I know,” or “I will be known for the good deeds I have done.” “Everyone has met grandiosely altruistic martyrs, self-sacrificing to the point where you can’t stand to be in the room with them,” Malkin says.

And there are highly introverted, or “vulnerable,” narcissists. These individuals feel they are more temperamentally sensitive than others. They react poorly to even gentle criticism and need constant reassurance. The way they feel special might actually be negative: They may see themselves as the ugliest person at the party or feel like a misunderstood genius in a world that refuses to recognize their gifts.”

They can’t back up their claims and if you compare them, they’re usually average. Pointing this out triggers narc rage.

They don’t just ‘use’ others, they use others as…. it’s instrumental.

They cannot self-regulate, they use other people as emotional tampons (especially men) and require excess ‘take’ and their giving is inferior, low quality but they over-value it because *they* are dispensing it. Thinking you’re special is in your actions, not a set of words. Tend to idolize others too, broken perceptions.