Define “normal”

it’s interesting people are siding with Joker in a clown world of the current year.

Called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/11/10/why-mockery/

And this stance by Sargon is, therefore, blatantly wrong. People with a conscience are not mentally unhinged for wanting good and justice to prevail, stop accepting their rhetorical subtext. They are locked in here with YOU, we outnumber THEM, we out-skill THEM, you can have FUN with them. YOU have that choice, they can only react.

“For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief.” Ecclesiastes 1:18

Initially, yes. Once it’s absorbed, you can be a whiny broflake like Sargon (somehow ‘surprised’ the people who say they hate white people, actually hate white people!) or be an adult and think “huh, useful”. ADAPT or DIE. I am literally years ahead on this curve.

Soft-pawed little liberals reee.

wah wah poor handsome white man with talent

hahaha no.gif

really?

cursed with awesome?

would you rather be an SJW, Sargon?

quit hiding your power level FFS, at least to yourself

little triggers the SJW hive like agreeing with them

capitalise on the stupidity of PC culture (as he does.… his livelihood relies on strong SJW culture, just sayin’)

you have the advantage, the red pill is actually very financially valuable

THINK

science drink

What would the (Jewish) Jesus do?

A – nothing (Churchian logic) because meek = weak in character now.

B – Jew everyone (atheistkult logic), the guy who rejected Satan’s materialism

C – Jew everyone so hard and in such a way that nobody could Jew anyone ever again…. it would be infamous Jewing. This is the Domino Approach. The pattern is the choice. Punish virtue (them) or punish vice (Christians*, allowing them to heap responsibilities on themselves, waiting for the dam to break).

You can steal tactics and use them better with your legitimately superior IQ is all I’m sayin’.

*”Be wise as serpents” – literally Jesus

dealwithit jesus

You don’t have to help everyone, did he help the moneylenders? Drop the school conditioning. You don’t have to save anyone (cuckservative logic, and you’re not Jesus), they are not being irrational, they actually mean what they say, they are not children.  They are not pure, innocent, gullible or just misunderstanding after years of conversation. Are they good or evil? Do they promote good or evil? You just don’t like the idea of the traitor but hey, Judas.

You fret like menopausal women about the End Times or the SJWs ‘winning’.

Winning what, exactly?

I would dearly like a serious answer on a postcard to that question.

I’m sick of broflakes using it for clickbait. Stop being so hysterically reactive to everything the Left does and man up. Let Gollum** die with the ring, we don’t give a fuck?

**Jewish myth.

It’s almost like these guys tacitly support the evil thing that makes them money. God forbid you might have to get a real job down a coalmine like we know every masculinity blogger secretly claims to want…

What if the SJWs ‘won’ everything, then?

hmm uhuh o rlly really ah sure thing

We know they cannot maintain First World living, they also are ignorant as to the value of Western Civ. Developing yourself will spite the Marxist, they cannot transfer the skills out of your brain.

“the prince of this world is judged” John 16:11

Stop acting like Atlas trying to play God, when you can’t even graduate to full-time adult. It’s Satanic to be such a control freak you genuinely think you speak for all men, all women or all right-wingers. Focus on your purpose instead.

Like logically, if women are property, you can’t be a deadbeat, you’d be lynched. Patriarchy holds men and spoiled sons fully accountable for abandonment, viscerally. There are many things you wimps feel entitled to, thanks to SJW Sexual Revolution BS, that are outright evil e.g. if you ‘get’ a woman pregnant, you feel entitled to demand an abortion. Or they’d charge the father for the starvation of their children, because provider gender role is male. MRAs doublespeak accept and reject this. It isn’t the mother’s responsibility to feed it, they had a duty to stick around. These guys want to be a whore like Hilton with no consequences, but reality burdens other people that way.

Who wants to pay for trash? To take their place in financial ruin?

You only have any rights over a child if you married their mother.

Get out of here with your ghetto logic to the contrary.

That’s what marriage is, you bloody retards. How are you adults who don’t get this?

The MRAs are angry they don’t immediately own another human being, as if that ever happened. Marriage gives you paternal rights, nothing less, and with it, responsibility! You were never yoked, you get NOTHING. You didn’t want her as your wife or she didn’t want you as her husband, you ‘deserve’ NOTHING. You are entitled to NOTHING. You have NO rights over the woman (who belongs to her family) because you stuck your dick in her one time, consensual or not. There is no Biblical basis for that, never has been but there is from killing attempted rapists….?

A spent seed is worthless, a fertile field is valuable. For people who mock SJW’s ignorance of biological difference, sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive? Nine months of extreme endurance on the body is very expensive. Have you looked up how medically damaging pregnancy is? Why aren’t single mothers suing for medical bills?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/9288375/pregnant-women-limit-human-endurance/

And no appreciation? No wonder they’re angry.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/10033108/mind-blowing-photo-womans-bones-moving-during-labour/

Don’t blame the sluts for what the deadbeats did. Would they need a ‘stepdad’?

The modern mangina tries to draw from the rights of the husband (patriarch) when he never stepped up to that plate. Can I draw a veteran’s pension, by that logic? Fake patriarchs are just sexually active Peter Pans.

The broflake types are acting in bad faith, literally. Plus the fallacy. They’re acting like they matter, like their opinion is real, like their feels are important and all the hysteria and chicken little is really pissing me off. I was here first. I never fell for the e-celeb cancer. It’s bad optics and drains attention from worthy ends. So what if the “economy” stock market collapses? I don’t live in Asia like a treasonous POS, I don’t give a shit.

Gary Oldman speaks to me on a spiritual level

Actually, I look forward to it. Lie down with dogs, get fleas.

You, God, are my God,
earnestly I seek you;
I thirst for you,
my whole being longs for you,
in a dry and parched land
where there is no water.

Drinking the tears of the anti-white/weeb menace is justice. They jumped ship – onto the Titanic.

lolmaletears

You can’t pretend to care about Muh West while living East, Judas.

Do not listen to trolls, scoffing at muh evil white mother figures.

“Cast out the scorner, and contention shall go out; yea, strife and reproach shall cease.” Prov 22:10

In trivial but hilarious news, only recently have people finally stopped telling me to move to China. See why it’s cheap now?

teadrinking sipping pretentious sarcastic bitch mmhmm not my problem lol

Where is this emboldened reaction from the people so desperate to be seen as right-wing?

https://biblereasons.com/fake-christians/

If you die because you followed some bravado blogger’s advice, that’s just natural selection ma fren.

yay happy

Their weak, lily-livered reaction from behind the safety of air con and a Macbook is the sign of our degeneracy. And they actually think they’re icons? They’re philosophers?*** They’re men of the people? People look up to their whining? People respect them? They admire their screeching?

Imagine what your Victorian grandpa would say.

“We need a good war”, I love that speech.

***I am clearly joking. It’s on the about page for God’s sake.

People these days don’t know their arse from their elbow, they dunno they’re born alright.

What is the Real Meaning of the Verse, “Wise as a Serpent and Harmless as a Dove?”

Do-gooders with pathological altruism are doing evil.

I the LORD search the heart and test the mind,
to give every man according to his ways,
according to the fruit of his deeds.

They are judged by their results.

Why worry about them? Are they your child?

oh come on my god why NO kill me now

Stop.

Stop the cucking already.

matrix system

We infantilise our “fellow whites” when freedom means you can choose to be dumb, you have agency to be evil – you cannot choose to force people to help you or believe you were innocent of knowing the fruit of your deeds would occur or bail you/others out of your own reaping when you were gloating about the sowing. Beware of non sequiturs.

It’s sad but some people have wasted lives. Some Marxists today would’ve been the past century’s sacrificial war heroes.

One month of reasonably, calmly mocking the wolves in sheep’s clothing (see recent islam meme for a start) would be glorious. Nobody wants to do it. Get one Owen Jones and his MO is kaput. No such person playing anti-white messiah could attempt his career path in future. You kill the hydra, not one head.

This is not only sanctioned but ordered. It isn’t my success, it’s all God.

Serve Him or Satan, easy choice.
I don’t want idolatry, I don’t want fame, I want good to win. That’s faith.

That’s why people connect to the new Joker too. It’s spiritual.

He’s a broken spirit.

John 17:15:

“I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil”.

are you not entertained

Do you know how easy it is to destroy these people with simple Bible quotes?

Nothing beats it as rhetoric or dialectic.

Ancient wisdom – appeal to authority and tradition. If they argue back, they validate. Critical theory requires they validate with argumentation.

would you rather be big fish in little pond or little fish in big pond?

Joker hits on Ecc 4:14 The youth may have come from prison to the kingship, or he may have been born in poverty within his kingdom.

stoicism isn’t nihilism, satanism, hedonism, apathy, despair

it’s remembering you can treat emotions as reasons without letting them rule you

the SJW is our chew toy and I wouldn’t have it any other way

computer.gif

they wanted this reality, they wanted to play This Game, the kid gloves are off, be careful what you wish for, these people are essentially self-destructive but how this happens can serve our thede interests long-term and culturally for better or for worse

1 cor 3:17 If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy that person; for God’s temple is sacred, and you together are that temple.

they wanted to play replace me! complete with bloody signposts.. so we do

refugeesracism

what kind of meritocracy honouring birth rights do we replace them with?

that is the only question that matters

The Great Replacement will happen whether you like it or not.

they killed internet bloodsports for beginning to discuss that pro-socially, logically and calmly!

 

I’d mention white slaves, including little girls across England…. but okay.

genocide

Social Services are actually paid to steal children here, per child. I believe Blair brought it in. That’s how it happens that trafficking for rape is written up as ‘gangs’ instead of white slavery, and active ongoing genocide by all markers especially point e.

Paying for children is slavery but everyone’s too scared to meme it. It puts off women from having kids…

paying per child = slave trade, right now, taxpayer-sponsored

That’s something to really shriek about.

the SJW is most scared of white people when they’re laughing at the anti-white plans

sarcy clapping

think about it

because they have a better one

Gen Y women more likely to cheat, slightly

Apparently?

We have a single lying chart, people. A single, lying chart. The Y-axis tops out at 30%.

Why Are Millennial Women Cheating More Than Men?



11% female, 10% male.
Wow, huge. LOL

Nah jk, it’s well within the error rate. Logically, if they’re all straight and fucking one another, it’d have to be.

Let’s pick this apart.

Who do they want to distrust whom?

Demographically, who is that?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/millennials-most-racially-diverse-generation-u-s-history-n46361
“the most racially diverse generation in U.S. history. About 43 percent are non-white”

Yup, that’ll do it. Especially when certain demos like the mixed and Hispanic are pushed to marry by relatives.

Back to top article:
“Joan says she was raised according to strict gender norms. “I grew up in the Philippines, a super conservative Catholic country, where cheating was a big no-no for women,” she explains. “You’re supposed to just accept your lot in life, but cheating in men is excused and often encouraged.” She can see a marked difference in the views of women her age compared to those her mother’s age. “Millennials are both way more jaded and way more chill than the previous generation,” she muses.”

How to spot anti-natal propaganda, MGTOW bait?

Note the use of white names, when sexual behaviour is best predicted along racial lines and Gen Y is heavily non-white, in America.
Men are meant to set the standards. What men do, women follow.

Whatever they do.

Monkey see, monkey do, morally.

Do I like this? No. Is it true? Yes. Morally, women are total sheep.

Anything men do, a sizeable number of lemmings with tits shall pursue too.

It’s the conscientious conformity.

“Relationships in general are different [in our generation],” Joan continues. “There seems to be more of a spectrum in how people date, which leads to all sorts of gray areas and wiggle room.

Hey, the PUAs wanted that ambiguity, they got it.

“While most of the women I speak to cheated while in ostensibly monogamous relationships — not a particularly noble challenge to institutional monogamy, they admit — some have now moved on to open or poly arrangements.

The Jews of Silicon Valley (Jews are very loose) push polygamy and polyandry follows, especially among non-white women.
You can tell this is true because they haven’t reported the key demographics – race and religion.

They want you to assume American here = white and Christian, because the story is negative.

Among more white age groups, women are in fact more faithful.

“Without fail, women told me that the men they cheated on were disappointing partners who weren’t meeting their relationship needs.”

No such thing as a ‘partner’. That’s PC language.

The need to have a husband and protector. They never ask about this need.
aka Men who won’t marry get no loyalty. You can’t commit adultery (the only actual, real ‘cheating’) on someone who isn’t your spouse. They didn’t say the vows! What they cheatin’ on?! Exactly? Instagram photo sanctity?!!

Nobody mentions this, for narrative. They’re interviewing an unmarried ‘cheat’ for that quote – fuck all to do with this ‘survey’ which I’m sure was conducted out of an urban area, right?

And don’t ask her what this “need” was in this unmarried woman to feel secure.

Ask these questions.

I never felt guilty,” Sophie says firmly. “All of my partners were people I took care of in the ways you always take care of men: emotionally, sometimes financially and dealing with untreated mental illness.”

So she was acting as a support, a wife.

In return, she got nothing. Worse, drained emotionally, financially and psychologically (dealing with crazies is maddening).
No ring to boot, she moved on. That’s sane. Nobody says anything, I’m not American so I don’t feel threatened in the least by honesty.

If he crazy, emotionally immature and exhibits psychopathic parasitism: LEAVE. That isn’t a MAN.

It’s like the unholy trio of hell naw. Those people shouldn’t even be dating (especially the emotional immaturity part).

Why are American men like this now, is a damn better question. They should be taking care of the woman, no wonder they bolt, the gender roles are backwards!

No woman wants to be your adult caretaker Peter Pan, even your own Mommy.

That’s how Psycho happened. These ‘men’ are acting like they’re disabled, WTF.

Literally no woman wants an adult baby. No one respects that.

All women to the manchild:

You cannot raise children without a husband, an actual man.

Laziness ain’t a disability. 

If American men reject their gender role, women abandon theirs. Hardly a choice.

“I didn’t really trust or respect men deeply enough anyway.”

Were you listening?

BOOM. Right there. Trust, then respect. We instinctively cannot trust a man who is inadequate on all cylinders of his gender role. Women are jaded because the men are soft.

What have they earned, by their actions? What masculinity is there to trust, exactly?

Women don’t respect sluts, either.
Women respect patriarchs, married and loyal husbands.
They’re conflating stats of adulterers (married) to the weasel word cheats – on what? They’re unmarried.

The faux confusion of “cheating” with “adultery” is a false equivalence, mind you.

Adultery in this survey hugely the lowest among wives of WW2 soldiers. No connection to the death of masculinity, obviously.

When are we bringing back stoning for adultery? Both guilty parties, full Bible!

An END to cucking!

Misogynists are just bitchy entitled brats

They act like a bitchy woman. They do not act straight.

e.g. As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality.

Respectful to friends and superiors, never to ugly women or inferiors. Very antisocial personality.

e.g. He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.

Narc triangulation, men say he’s good, women say he’s bad. Narc sucks up attention.

r-types, like Labour pitting Muslims against Christians. Whoever wins, will vote for Labour.

“He’s such a nice guy” – red flag, nice to men = evil to women. Men are meant to compete.

It’s a perversion of gender role.

A guy like that tried ignoring me once, thinking I’d decided to go out with him after being pressured. (nope) Treat them mean and all. Like I said, “didn’t even notice”. Really, actually, didn’t. Since he was playing the female role, why would I? I’m not the man.

If I were a dyke, I still wouldn’t notice him, a male. It STILL makes no sense, to this day.

Answers on a postcard. If they liked ‘strong independent (manly) women’, one keyword there is independent.

He threw a tantrum about me ‘missing him’ (almost stranger) and it being a ‘test’ (not a single date) and stomped off, half-expecting me to chase him. It was comical. His dick was not valuable. Dick is not a rare commodity. Turned out to be a nutjob. Shocker. I’d actually felt better when he wasn’t around, this is why they can’t be the woman.

They treat women mean and act like women (schoolgirls who won’t talk to you), then complain when the woman leaves. They believe affection must be tinged with abuse. Trauma bonds formed by control and gaslighting aren’t love, stupid bitches. Any secure person will run for the hills over broken glass.

“Nice Guy” – repressed rage (usually left-wing, white guilt and Asian fetish) and kinda gay.

An Asian Nice Guy would have guilt with a White fetish, Anglo culture obsession (opposite of weeb).

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

It’s a defense mechanism from narc inferiority/superiority complex and self-loathing but mostly a blind spot, e.g.

  1. He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
  2. He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
  3. He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
  4. On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
  5. He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
  6. He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

If that all sounds borderline to you, yes, a lot of misogynists are undiagnosed male borderlines.

3. is a psychopath, as is 5 and 6.

Huge hypocrites, project women as doing all of those. Implying men are impossible candidates.

Lower IQ, since misogyny is an indicator of inferiority. Defense in defense mechanism avoids this fact.

Falsely claim men are intelligent despite huge number of retards.

Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them.

Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.

Idiots. Defective brains.

The wounded masculine. Sadism. A woman who spots them (empath) and so, isn’t hurt, becomes a ‘bitch’. He was the one bitching, trying to wound her. Not wounding her wounds his ego, narcissism 101.

Real men don’t treat the weaker sex like crap, they have a duty. Women need men and men need women, emotionally.

Video: 10 arguments against pre-marital sex

or fornication, if you dislike PC terms.

Pleasantly surprised by this logic.

Yes, promiscuity x divorce risk must be studied more, actually. Much more. One major issue mathematically is how few promiscuous marry AT ALL to even qualify for the studies so marital rate too (since that’s important information for people). Then psychological issues round out the methodology for the ones that predispose to those behaviors in the first place (not a free choice, a compulsion) and muddy the waters in the non-pathological population (i.e. not personality disorders).

It seems to operate by weakening pair bonds until the person is incapable of making them.

I know AC would agree with me that an amygdala atrophy study in the promiscuous and also divorced groups would be illuminating. Imagine if you can check divorce risk with a brain scan before marriage!

And once developed, can it ever shrink or is gain permanent?

comment

This is an old truth that has been only relatively recently abandoned. The reasons for all Christian principles are entirely practical. There is a saying ‘you are not punished for your sins, but by them

The big lie spoken by manwhores in particular is that ruining themselves emotionally (and physically) will make them better husbands for the right woman. The feminists carbon copied that rationalization, it’s still bullshit. How does adding psychological issues make you better in any way? And why should your spouse have to clean up the messes left by a trail of people who hurt you? And if you were remorseless and mistreated, abandoned them, what’s to stop you doing it to your spouse? Why reward that with love and fidelity?

Some people are incapable of loving and therefore don’t deserve to be loved.

Unequal yokes are abusive.

In romantic/sexual relationships, what doesn’t kill you makes you weaker.

“Muh Experience” is the idiot’s way of claiming that learning everything wrong will make them right. It’s insanity. This isn’t a pop quiz you can redo, it’s your life; it isn’t a game you can respawn into ad nauseum, you are learning patterns and reactions and if they don’t work, you’re far, far worse off than the person with NO “experience” – this is Dunning-Kruger.

Experience of failure means you’re wrong. You’re the common denominator.

The definition of insanity is the man who fucks around and wonders why he can’t find marriage material.

Hook-up culture has trained men into being useless husbands, they have the opposite required qualities.

To put it crassly, they’re saying “I shit in the pool, why is the water brown?”

Where have all the good women gone? Well, how many women have you slept with? Subtract those from the communal pool. Now extrapolate.

No, you can’t Have It All. You never could, it was a Boomer marketing gimmick. But the economy (and GDP) make more money from cads than dads. The politicians are playing them. They don’t care about you. They don’t care if you’re a genetic dead-end.

These useful idiots would literally argue the man who fucks 100 women and finds no love (0/100) is better husband material than a man who fucked zero women and also found no love yet, the unproven quantity. Narcissists lie.

Lust doesn’t lead to love, it leads to personal disgust. Hollywood lied so you’d sell your soul buying their stuff to fill the emptiness of your single life. They can’t admit it without the self-loathing attacking them so they blame the “thots” in standard projection and denial of agency. If you’re so easily led into temptation, you’re too weak to call yourself a man.

If you treat your love life like a game, women will see you as a joke.

Men rejecting masculinity

Alt title: men rejecting their gender role (then blaming women).
https://www.mercatornet.com/above/view/apatheism-is-more-damaging-to-christianity-than-atheism-and-antitheism/21642

“More nuanced and incisive rebuttals, such as Edward Feser’s The Last Superstition and David Bentley Hart’s Atheist Delusions, somehow never quite achieved the same recognition.”

cabal

“The questions and debates engaged in by the new atheists were often reductive, emotionalized and glib, but one does have to grant that they at least tackled the great questions of faith in their way.”

All redditfags do is strawman and pretend to be House on social questions while their own lives are miserable bachelorhoods full of porn and video games. It’s like church ladies self-congratulating.

Yeah, in spite of mathematical certainty, they’re all 130+ and can’t spell or compose a sentence for shit. O.K.

The only way they feel good about themselves is crusaderism, finding a “sinner” and making them feel bad or stressed e.g. Christians.

“Its supporters soon tired of tedious and repetitive debates,

with their navel

and they began to argue with each other about social justice and political correctness.”

And failed, clue.

Nothing they say is original. They’re multicultural monstrosities.

“The answer lies in the grey zone between believers and atheists.

no?

If you want to find the real wolf steering sheep away from the flock, look not to fedora-bedecked atheists, but to your average apatheist.”

No, hedonist. They pay lip service to virtue to continue a life of vice, massive cognitive dissonance.
You are not special, broflakes. This is not a special thing worthy of a snowflake term.
e.g. they will say all men should be married, and refuse to get married. Idiots.
They will say all men do better in the military and call the draft “sexist” (like evolution didn’t happen).
Women are weak but should magically overpower any male attacker with kung fu grip (but hitting a man is sexist).
They will know about atheist sub-fertility and refuse to be religious because they think it’s beneath them, a status signal, and again, they’re avoiding patriarchal standards i.e. no manwhoring, no carousing, no drugs, no lechery, actual standards of historical masculine virtue.
They don’t want to grow up or can’t (emotionally regressed). Peter Pan spent all his time “having fun” and dodging responsibility.
The idea of being a gentleman or “respectable” is something they dismiss out of hand with another mis-label, cuck.
No, a cuck is someone who rejects tradition and history in their own life while verbally going on (and on and on…) about its importance, they’re cuckservatives hoping to freeload off the backs of real men’s hard work. For thee but not for me. They’re worthless humans, if they won’t contribute they should emigrate. They’d actually take a class on Penis Studies (Man Studies) because they’re so mind-numbingly boring (predictable, all on the same diet, same clothes, same haircut, same reading material across borders, like a cult of dull) and lacking in individuality.

They’ll say men should be providers – and refuse to provide even for themselves (a mantrum) and worse, defend deadbeats!
Cowardly r-types.

“It’s okay when we do it” hypocrites. They’re socialists who self-loathe in different ways. An abortion clinic on every corner and whore pills in every 13yo girl’s hands would be alright by them! Moral relativists. “Social liberal, economic conservative” cucks. All the gibs, as long as someone else pays.

You can only strike from your gender role if you were competent enough to have ever achieved it.

They reject their gender role, like male SJWs, in favour of materalism, atheistic hedonism (acting like an animal). It’s the exact same thing.
In their own ideal society, they’d be rejects!
Nihilism in the pomo sense of the word is the belief system of losers, it’s their cover for postmodernism while pretending to be oh-so different (special) from the SJWs (narcissism of small differences).
Even this article’s like “this is a new and special thing”.
No? It’s just that we notice because dueling is illegal (otherwise their lip would get them shot by a real man) and they can’t be cannon fodder without an overt war. This is what happens in the dysgenic situation when you let the Low IQ males with delusions of superiority (a self-proclaimed penis pass, if you will, on all sin) run their whining mouth about how, in the most spoiled society ever, they’re still abject failures! Oh, poor baby in your air conditioned palace on welfare! It must be so hard!
Their failure isn’t society’s fault, it’s a character fault and on the contrary, the ones bitching online are exclusively reared in the middle-class (they had advantages).

They have no excuse.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/09/19/middle-class-white-male-memes/

If a meme about a spoiled suburbanite Prince stereotype offends you…. it should.

Shame is GOOD.

Their slide down the social mobility scale is a sign the system works. You aren’t entitled to a better life than your parents unless you work at least as hard (complaining isn’t work).

I’d know.

9/10 they’re actually nagging. But they do nothing themselves. Only nag. We have male shrews! They expect the rest of us will step in like their helicopter parents. You’re an adult, we owe you nothing.

The Boomers are right about the entitled ones. It just happens to be the hippy kids.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/the-anti-spanking-initiative-is-r-selected/

Nagging only works if you’re bound i.e. parents, marriage. Nagging society doesn’t wash and given the advantages men have on many levels (that they deny “male privilege is a myth” when they seek to evade responsibility or champion with hyperbole “men are superior biologically” to signal, both when it’s convenient, like we don’t notice), they don’t have an excuse that blames women e.g. when boys lose out on math tests and other schoolwork, it’s because they study less around the time they discover porn. Asians can’t watch that stuff all day, look at their grades, it isn’t “all men”, it’s all degenerate men who make poor lifestyle choices. So they want a meritocratic system – but only when it leads to positive outcomes for themselves (liars).

If someone works harder than you, they deserve to beat you! Add up hours studied and you’ll find female (and male) conscientiousness isn’t bias, they activate with their IQ the traits which help them. The guy or girl “winging it” the night before deserves to fail*. Low IQ don’t have the IQ to know what they’re NOT doing! That isn’t everyone else’s fault! If there are systemic forces against men in some fields, the same must be true of women in other fields because that is how systems work, ya dummies!

Otherwise it’s like saying there’s north without south or taste without those tacky cheese squares at the other end of the spectrum. Logic is consistent! Smart men address the topic of stupid men – until they’re shouted down as “sexist” (???), like smart women.

It just so happens by nature that there are more lazy men! So yeah, they fail! Confound!

You cannot ignore the left half of the bell curve, men overpopulate it!

They’ve simply never survived in these numbers before because responsibility is the new leprosy in a decadent West. It makes a lot of sense actually. No prior society (that didn’t collapse) ever had to tolerate this much stupid and it shows.

If we live in clown world, send in the clowns…

War is like sexual selection, it’s a good thing that keeps the bad genes down. The modern world is like adding shit to the pool so it doesn’t feel excluded.
It turns out you don’t need to sterilize irresponsible people, just give them a free sex doll on condition they never have children (or they’d be aborted). We could solve this in two generations if we stopped listening to their “feelings” (they don’t have feelings, relativists, they only ramble and screech).

Seriously, hand them sexbots on condition of no kids to inflict on the future world (and no sex crimes, because apparently their hand wasn’t as big as their ego). They’re genetic suicides anyway, that or move them (could be cheaper) to a literal Pleasure Island with no internet (no corrupting the outside world) and they can never leave (I figured Westworld was about this, a brothel prison with no victims, would’ve been cooler). They’d OD in about a week without the nanny state. Actually, a literal death camp could work very simply: press lever 1 for food or 2 for heroin. Technically, it’s suicide. Dummies are predictably hedonic.

*They’ve been told it’s important for literally over a decade. You can lead a horse to water. Education is wasted on the lazy and stupid, and they’re the same people. That’s Dunning-Kruger. They’re blind to what they’re missing because they’re missing it!

They cannot see past their ego to anything, including Pascal’s Wager. Again, deny and dismiss, typical cuck.
The destructive person (antisocial to society) telling you you deserve to be destroyed (like an SJW) because society sucks unless it’s sucking them off (but it isn’t their job to fix it?)… boys who weren’t raised with real discipline have no shame (sociopath trait). They’ve been allowed to get away with ruining themselves and remaining psychologically as teenagers.

It’s just the dysgenic men too proud to become blatant SJWs. 

Actually worse than SJWs, wow. They’d sell their grandma for a porn star.

You can’t sympathize with people who hate you and your people.
There’s the obvious traitor and the sneaky little shits who under-mine attempts to make things better for everyone because the gap to their own life would become greater. Fifth Column is worse.

Incels are bachelors

Single, unmarried. It’s their choice.

This is normal. This is the historical norm. If you don’t marry, you have no right to sex ever.
If you want to be a degenerate, you shouldn’t expect society to approve or support you in it.

Why must I keep explaining this to dopey Americans? That is what marriage means. It’s a sexual bond enshrined in law for the protection of both parties, although we should bring back other, older laws to protect it further e.g. false light, breach of promise, criminal conversation, alienation of affections, abandonment charges.

You could get an arranged marriage to a desperate third world woman or save up and pay for it. You do not, so you don’t really want the sex. Nobody is entitled to sex, and that’s one of the reasons birth control shouldn’t be supported by taxpayers. Some societies pay for hookers for the disabled, it’s absurd. Maybe you could move there and feign a spinal injury. Instead of nagging like a petulant child that no woman wants to go near you, you could try to grow up. It isn’t about the sex? Nobody in this life can demand love and affection from anyone else. Coincidentally, you’re often the same group moaning that feminists must earn respect. Everyone must, including you. If nobody respects or likes you, you can’t force it and have only yourselves to blame. Why didn’t your incompetent parents tell you this?

There’s a simple way to relieve yourself but if you’re porn addicted that’s a separate issue and real sex between people who like one another isn’t anything like porn, you’ve been training your brains wrong.

Other humans do not have a right to consent unless they also have a right to reject. It’s part of freedom of association, it isn’t even sexual. Hollywood tells you everyone else is having sex. No and it’s envious to resent the world for this mistaken perception, simply look up life partner count stats and drop it a few points for lying. All women are not hookers and even hookers where they exist are not free. Stop being so entitled. You’re not entitled to date a fat woman and they’re not entitled to you either. Without this element of personal choice and mutual exchange, there is no relationship.

You wanted to be single. Lone wolves don’t get laid. Pick up a book on it. You chose the life. It’s defined by celibacy. Celibacy is the proper term for what you are if you don’t ‘get laid’, what are you? A tea tray?! Your personal issues with horniness require professional intervention when it becomes a warped identity and net obsession. Get your hormones checked at least. What you urge has nothing to do with sexual status, show me that documentation to prove otherwise. The ‘sowing your wild oats’ thing is another internet myth shared by sad men grunting into cameras about how the whole world hates them but owes them… doesn’t it have that right to dislike them? What are you adding to it? You have all this opportunity and you’re no better than the Muh Dick rapefugees.

Entitlement is ugly in both sexes. You don’t deserve jack shit. You never did.

Ask yourself, how crazy do you sound like, trying to insist on something nobody can force?

There is no Affirmative Action for sex, you’re a desperate degenerate. h/t uncabob for pointing out that’s exactly what they want, state-sponsored fuckathons. You have two hands.
Manwhores aren’t better than you either, they just like to tell you that. It’s a lie.

Source: The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement

As for the genetic dregs, those existed in every society. Why should they breed if nobody wants them? Sexual selection is an evolutionary pressure test, it exists for the collective good of all. You couldn’t impress those women’s families either, so what exactly are you advocating? Bride kidnapping?

Men with social problems make terrible fathers if they did breed, those issues are more common in men.

Monogamous societies still have rites of passage and rules of courtship to prove you earn a wife and are capable of supporting a household as its head.

https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success

You don’t want to do that? You don’t want to grow up. We don’t see 13-year old boys demanding free copies of Hustler because they have ‘urges’ so obviously, society must tend to them.

The standards of humanity in all time periods won’t be dropped for your magical snowflake American fatasses.

Be a man and you will attract a woman.

Not that you should really care about such an arbitrary definition of a rite of passage as sex. Does a dog become a man after it ‘bangs’? Or is this a red herring, a distraction from bigger crises and problems like a good job or buying a house? Is a virgin unworthy of respect if they do good in the world, compared to a Kardashian? You should be against virgin shaming, not self loathing.

Drop the bitchy personality, it doesn’t even get women ‘laid’ and to be honest, it’s effeminate, gay men do it.
Do straight women want teh gays? No. Not the sane ones, at least.

Don’t be this guy.

They’re not even good friends. Women get the creepy friend pretenders all the time, some are tough to spot and assume their ‘trick’ of being a totally different person will magically make you grow sexual feelings for someone acting about twelve. It’s the sneaky fucker strategy in humans and unlike in fish, it doesn’t work.

It isn’t the fault of half the world’s population if you aren’t desirable. If you were desirable, you still wouldn’t be entitled to a sex buffet. If kings have to ask consent, you have to take No for an answer too.

Cut out the entitlement, you’re fucking pathetic. Actual men with accomplishments would agree. Stop wasting your life being a bitch or go gay, they’re never short on options.

You aren’t married? Why should anyone sleep with you? …. Why.
You hate marriage, kids, women in general? Don’t be shocked if we can sense this and run like the human plague you are. Don’t base your life on something dissolute and meaningless as orgasms.

Video: The sorrow of the man-child

This guy is legit.

Zizek is a troll.

From Muh Future post

Boys cannot become men without women. It’s the missing puzzle piece. Insulting women is making your situation worse, the enemy wants you to be anti-women and anti-natal (they’re the same thing).

Their elders won’t let them grow up.

Hmm.

familiar

http://www.apa.org/monitor/jun06/emerging.aspx

29 year olds being infantilised?

Are you fucking kidding?

Fun fact: retardé means delayed.

Signs of an Emotionally Immature Adult

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-superhuman-mind/201611/10-signs-emotionally-immature-adult

Little Prince (or Princess) Syndrome, when it occurs in adulthood, is also known as Peter Pan Syndrome.”
Little Prince (or Princess) Syndrome is related to, but not identical to, Emperor Syndrome, a term is primarily used to describe Chinese boys with no siblings who behave like little tyrants.”

Unfair, Princess Syndrome is more common with the Chinese women at present. You don’t see Chinese men giggling and running round big Chanel stores with their friends on Daddy’s credit card.

“Little Princes and Princesses, as I define them, are grown men or women who act as if they are selfish children, narcissistic teenagers, or irresponsible young adults, and feel entitled to behave as they see fit. Following are 10 traits typical of someone living with Little Prince or Princess Syndrome. (For simplicity’s sake, I use the term Little Prince below, and refer to the role of mothers, not father, but the signs are applicable to all genders.)”

A selection;

He acts like a child, a teenager, or a person who is much younger than he is. He might throw temper tantrums or party all night with people 10 years younger than him.

He acts as if women should serve him. He expects to be taken care of and be pampered on demand. He will happily take but never give.

He cannot maintain a long-term, stable romantic relationship. Former partners end up becoming his enemies or new playmates.

He is commitment-phobic in nearly all areas of life—despite having a needy attachment style. It can take him six months to commit to buying a new sofa.

I have seen that.
My words-
“It’s a sofa, you can dump it.”

They see their possessions as an extension of them.
Possessions include people.

If you don’t make them look good, you’re gone.
The excuse is usually pleasing others, so they also look good to you. B.S.

Btw, Asians invented ghosting. You made less money? You missed a promotion? They forget to send you a dinner party invite. It makes you wonder if they’re capable of the friendship thing with one another too.

He is often passive-aggressive, meaning he has a tendency to engage in an indirect expression of hostility through acts such as subtle insults, sullen behavior, stubbornness, or a deliberate failure to accomplish required tasks.

They are not subtle.
Have you ever met a subtle man?… I rest my case.

He is a narcissist or exhibits a childish selfishness. If something is even mildly inconvenient, he will resist doing it.

Emotional child.

He rarely thinks anything is his fault. He blames everyone around him for everything that goes wrong in his life—even his mother if he can’t find another scapegoat.”

Victim blaming, victim mentality… tendency to complain about victim culture because they think they’re entitled to that pity, not that it’s wrong. Whiny and lots of nagging, like an old woman.

If you find this useful, you might find these too.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/is-america/201601/con-artists-and-their-marks

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-flux/201610/9-classic-traits-manipulative-people

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201609/meet-the-real-narcissists-theyre-not-what-you-think
“For example, he suggests, some narcissists can be of the “communal” variety and actually devote their lives to helping others. They might even agree with such statements as “I’m the most helpful person I know,” or “I will be known for the good deeds I have done.” “Everyone has met grandiosely altruistic martyrs, self-sacrificing to the point where you can’t stand to be in the room with them,” Malkin says.

And there are highly introverted, or “vulnerable,” narcissists. These individuals feel they are more temperamentally sensitive than others. They react poorly to even gentle criticism and need constant reassurance. The way they feel special might actually be negative: They may see themselves as the ugliest person at the party or feel like a misunderstood genius in a world that refuses to recognize their gifts.”

They can’t back up their claims and if you compare them, they’re usually average. Pointing this out triggers narc rage.

They don’t just ‘use’ others, they use others as…. it’s instrumental.

They cannot self-regulate, they use other people as emotional tampons (especially men) and require excess ‘take’ and their giving is inferior, low quality but they over-value it because *they* are dispensing it. Thinking you’re special is in your actions, not a set of words. Tend to idolize others too, broken perceptions.

What PUAs get wrong about ‘alpha wolves’

https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/pick-up-artists-dont-understand-what-alpha-even-meansas-evidenced-by-wolves

Everything?

Alpha means being a Patriarch – married, traditional, monogamous, loyal, fertile.

They’re trying desperately to signal K-selected traits with an r-sexuality.
That’s why it fails. No, you fail, you’re inferior socially, found wanting.
It’s easier to signal being a good father and run (cowards) than to actually become a man.
There is also the matter that Alpha is an animal aristocracy, not only are you born into it but high fitness isn’t limited to males, there are Alpha females obviously because the Alphas of the pack are K-selected aka the Alpha Male only lies with his female. This isn’t a lion/pride arrangement and in prides, the lionesses hunt (work).
Protean displays as mixed messages?
Protean displays are done by defensive cowards when faced with a predator…. actually yeah, PUA < most women.

‘But it’s the alpha/beta hierarchy that’s really having a renaissance online. And its current use completely ignores the science behind it. So I went to a wolf park to study their “on the prowl” behavior.
“[Alpha is] a term that was coined in biology, just the first Greek letter in the Greek alphabet, just a convenience thing,” says Monty Sloan, senior animal curator and staff photographer at Wolf Park. “And it’s been kind of undermined by public perception of what that might mean.” First of all, wolf packs have two alphas: a male and a female. “There’s always two alphas in a pack. That’s what defines a pack. The pack might be two wolves, but socially, they are dominant. They are alphas. If more wolves enter the pack, they’ll submit to those two. And what you’ll see is a linear hierarchy develop.”‘

Like a ….class system?

Alpha is a power couple.

If you’re not married to an alpha while being one yourself, you’re not Alpha with a capital ‘A’, at most potential.

I’ve been trying to correct them on the ethology for years.

‘These two alphas are usually a breeding pair, and in wolves found in the Midwest, wolf packs are usually a nuclear family. This is why some wolf researchers have abandoned the term alpha altogether, like David Mech, whose book The Wolf popularized the idea of an alpha wolf in the 1970s. “[T]hey are merely breeders, or parents, and that’s all we call them today,” he writes on his academic website. Rather than one alpha male having some harem of lady-wolves at his beck and call because he’s so strong and butch, the alpha male is daddy.
You don’t fight to get to the alpha position, you usually inherit it. You’re usually in the right place at the right time,” says Sloan. “All you have to do is have offspring, and the offspring are going to grow up submitting to their parents. That’s all it takes.”‘

K-SELECTION.
Genetic superiority, proven by wits.

Genetic suicides or deadbeats can NEVER, EVER BE ALPHA.

I’ve mentioned the Darwin of why on here, it’s the Parental Investment theory.

Do they listen? No. That would involve real self-improvement and the sunk cost fallacy of bullshit e-books has wormed into their brain. Love is not a game unless you’re crazy. Taylor Swift crazy.

‘According to To Be An Alpha, a website dedicated to helping men become the alphas of their pack, alpha males that take control are “vocal and loud” and “aren’t afraid to get physical.”‘

Obnoxious and boyishly immature? Entitled?
They’re trying to rebrand a gobby chav teen as the epitome of masculinity?

‘Dominant breeding wolves aren’t afraid to get physical, but they don’t start fights either. “You don’t typically see a dominant wolf going around, parading around acting tough and aggressively confronting the other wolves,” says Sloan. “When you do see that, it’s usually a sign of a lack of confidence. Ironically, the animal is not very confident if it’s doing that, and it’s not comfortable at all.”‘

Freud. Signalling masculinity, like talking about it, means you aren’t. You’re lying and hoping people won’t forget you exist. That’s narcissistic, that’s solipsistic (wait, no, just egocentric and selfish). The abuse of ‘solipsism’, which funny at first as intellectual posturing, now grates.

Any man who must say I am King, isn’t a King?

If you insist on picking a sex that leads the Alpha debate, it’s female.

Another major misconception is that alpha males are dominant over alpha females. “The dominance between the sexes is not that important to them,” says Sloan.
The wolves I visited at Wolf Park were a group of siblings: Kanti, Bicho, and Fiona. Kanti is the alpha male, Fiona is the alpha female. She is also dominant over Kanti. “If there is an altercation between the female and Kanti, Kanti is on his back submitting,” says Sloan. “Even though she is much smaller than him, she is the dominant wolf in the pack.” This is typical of the packs in Wolf Park.’

tfw literal animals are more socially intelligent than you, Roosh V
It’s Bateman’s Principle, the mother makes babies and in K-terms, that’s all that matters. Eggs > Sperm
Women are more selective, women need to be protected but this is from other males, sexual competition.
How many men would die for their woman/children? How many of those are men?
Yet they claim they want a Patriarchy. Surrrre. Patriarchy isn’t male liberty, it’s male enslavement to women. At least, in Darwinian terms but at least the good men survive biologically. Women’s lib was liberation for the sexuality of men to fuck and run. Sexual Revolution was terrible for women, great for men. If you take away our vote and retain your own, all the legs will be shutting. And then other men will take yours, based on history.

“It turns out, not even peacocks truly peacock. We may think their visual display is pretty enchanting, but peahens aren’t always looking at the display. They’re listening. Peacocks vibrate their tail feathers in two distinct patterns; they twerk, essentially.”

shh, I enjoyed letting them make fools of themselves and it makes them easier to avoid
God Bless Ed Hardy for that.

Peacocking is actually about male attractiveness, genetic beauty i.e. the gym does nothing, lookism is real.

Commitment phobia in men

Came across this by chance.

https://www.elsaelsa.com/astrology/men-dont-want-to-partner-because-women-are-toxic/

You shouldn’t be blaming women for the decisions of men. This applies to homosexuals too.

Men are responsible for their own f-ups and they’re failing society by refusing to commit. Boo hoo child of divorce, grow up! Blaming your parents, seriously? How old are they?

Men are meant to lead, including in establishing families. They are lazy. That is why society rots, weak men.

Just Be Yourself is terrible advice. They expect to be held to no external standard they wouldn’t pass. Trophies, get ya trophies! Hold them to a classic standard they can’t pass? You’re a cunt, at least a bitch. No, really, that’s the level they sink to. Children with male lusts. I want a reality show where we send these Nice Guys on dates and watch them being rude, let a studio audience vote on how they truly behave. They’ll deny, deny, deny. The audience is biased. They’re never wrong, like a toddler.

They claim to treat women with respect…. only to make a sex joke, call a girl who wasn’t interested ‘a whore’ (???), fornicate and lie about it, cheat…. they think we’re stupid. Especially considering this thing called Internet.

It’s the ghetto model of courtship which is to say: trash. No fathers. R-types claiming to be reliable, successful and responsible….we can see you’re not.

There’s a serious attitude problem where they think they’re perfect ‘just the way they are’. OK, if you’re a Disney Princess…

Do you want to date an emotional toddler? Complete with tantrums and gaslighting (I never said that text you are showing me). They’re insane.

That’s why even their girlfriends run. Narcissism has a mask that lasts 6-18 months. Under it, they’re ugly.

Commitment phobia is a classic of men and culture reinforces this.

That men can’t afford to keep a wife (they expect she’ll provide for him but also stay at home, be Madonna and Whore, mother and porn star, have at least 4/5 jobs at once – cook, cleaner, hostess, bar friend, primary caregiver, insanity!) and economically, they can’t afford a family.

They refuse to admit this poverty has anything to do with the Gen Y/Z work ethic.

Sure.

They are anti-traditional but want the safety net of it.

It’s now common to hear from perma-single men;

“Why should I buy a woman dinner?”

  1. it’s a choice?

Literally, that’s the point of a date, the man proves he is worthy, as suitor. That’s all, 100%, what a date is. When you ask a woman on a date, you are offering to do exactly that, no more or less. Everyone sniggers at these idiots behind their backs, it’s retarded to the point of humiliation. Every woman hearing that, our eyes widen and we cringe. It’s like hearing a feminazi. They want without giving. Reciprocity is found in birds, FFS.

They refute that fact. Like feminists questioning gender norms (that’s what it is). They deny a male gender role but claim to be masculine? ….. no. Certainly, it puts off anyone traditional in a hundred-mile radius like sexual mustard gas.

But all the issues addressed herein are blatant and disrespectful (almost disdainful) of women in that implication. Women will never want to breed with a misogynist, that would be crazy-stupid. Automatically, any wife material woman will think ‘cad’ if a man doesn’t think she’s worthy a minor social ritual. He won’t ever provide,that is a Bad Man, to shirk his end of the equation, and we don’t wanna be welfare queens. Then with age, wrinkles and losing hair, they still go after the teenage women who always ignored them. …Losers.

Love isn’t a numbers game by age or approaches.

They bring a pornographic misogyny to the table. You’ve seen them rant, right? Women are higher EQ, we understand their psyche from their speeches. Yeah, we hear you. Wish we didn’t. That’s why none of us wanna date you. Cooties metaphors should be left at school. Mixed social settings are a rehearsal for coupled life and 21st century man is far more rude than the average feminist. They just don’t know it and we quietly avoid them.

They complain there are no ladies…..

There are. But you’re not a gentleman. Hence, Nice Guy memes. .,,They aren’t nice, they’re users. They think we’re stupid, while knowing about the EQ thing. Dissonance.

For a flipped example of the above question.

They have become like feminists – the worst kind: “why do I need to look pretty on a date?”

That’s the kind of dumb where they dunno social conventions aren’t a choice. Do it or not, no customizing. It’s like something a five year-old would say. “Why do I need to open the door for her? She should open it for me!*” children are meant to be inconsiderate, though, you grow out of it. *Those are not the values of a traditional man.

The psychology is interesting – they get everything they want from ‘girlfriends’ aka the idea of a GF makes a wife redundant. Legally, men are shirking their duty and there is a widespread maturity problem in all ages and both sexes today. It’s simply apparent in men because young men are failing to thrive on purpose, preferring porn and video games.

Disloyalty is on the rise, thanks to gay culture infiltrating straights (Grindr, Tindr).

Cheating is supposed to get you divorced. 10 commandments.

Peter Pans are a known issue, look at the men over 21 who care as much about the future as a 13yo girl (psychopathic high time pref) and act like teenagers (OMG the slang, so wrong).

They’re trying to demand impossible things of women (look like a supermodel, don’t be vain, be wise, don’t age, have expensive taste but pay for yourself because we love you). Women are leaving (most of) them on the shelf because the effete modern male is NOT a man and has NOTHING to offer. Look at them sometime.

Talk to them, ask them what they’ve got going for them, what gets women.

…It’ll get awkward.

If you were a woman, honestly, would you marry any of them? Give up all potential…. for that?

Worst part?

They blame women for their incompetence at being men.

That’s why they’re alone. As a man in all traditional metrics, how do they do?

Not fake muscles like breast implants, fake masculinity looks vain and gay (cos it is).

Professional reputation, any savings, desire for children, will to parent and be a good father, impulse control, no temper, no resentment of women. Things historically considered basic.

Most can’t even speak to women without insulting them (to later ask with truly autistic self-awareness ‘why do they avoid me?’) , creep around, lech, openly deride what is feminine and good and expect a 10 to plop out the Heavens just for them.

Negging attracts the damaged ones. They’re totally insecure together at least.

If no woman is good enough, their masculinity will never be tested.

If they never marry, they can’t fail as a husband.

Cowards. 9/10. Cowards.

Petty, childish, nauseatingly evasive from an adult.

Women are waiting for them to self-correct.

They want the best of both worlds in all cases or they check out. Swallowed equality propaganda, but men must prove themselves to women to breed. They try to get women to qualify then wonder why only the masculine ones apply?? They don’t want to provide anything, so they receive nothing. They are spoiled and entitled, whiny and bitchy like other women, the worst ones.. the ones we avoid even for friendship. I said the opposite here once, it applies vice versa; if women wanted someone whiny, bitchy, effeminate, we’d be lesbians!

We don’t want another woman, even if he has a penis. Also porn isn’t real and no woman will ever worship it. Don’t put pussy on a pedestal, inverted. No Mighty Phallus expectations.

Your body doesn’t make you masculine, gender is MENTAL.

They are mentally deficient in this. How many can hang a picture? Change oil? Take a punch?

Men, 101. Their grandfathers would be disgusted and ashamed.

This is common sense.

They do not know this. Women resent needing to teach a male age-peer the fundamentals, we’re not Mom. That is creepy.

They aren’t worth the effort. Part of the male fitness test is initiative. They don’t want to do some male duties? They’re broken, like society.

TLDR: They’re wholly selfish but can’t even take care of themselves. A woman wants a husband, not a moaning child.

They are not husband material, they deny such a thing exists (very progressive) because they’d fail any fair test; they’re not even men. They’re male children that survived to 18 without maturing. I hated typing this, makes me fear for the West.

It’s so bitter and narcissistic raging, they’re seriously talking about cloning. …. they couldn’t afford.