Traits of toxic people and PUA/’game’ gaslighting

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-flux/201608/8-common-traits-the-toxic-people-in-your-life
” They focus on problems, not solutions.”
e.g. Critical theory and being ‘unhelpful’ for…?
“They use other people to accomplish whatever their goal happens to be.”
e.g. PUAs. Formal term is triangulation, they tell you what you want to hear.
“They make you prove yourself to them.” You only qualify yourself to a superior, peer must be assumed until proven and isn’t based on a demographic factor, it’s individual. In the reverse…
e.g. Everyone who says, in effect ‘I dislike your opinion, so you’re part of outgroup’, a no true scotsman.
“Beware of people who find fault with you and make you wrong. Loyalty is foreign to them.”
They’re never wrong, are they? 😀
“Toxic people often make you want to fix them and their problems. They want you to feel sorry for them, and responsible for what happens to them. Yet their problems are never really solved, for once you’ve helped them with one crisis, there’s inevitably another one. What they really want is your ongoing sympathy and support, and they will create one drama after another in order to get it. “Fixing” and “saving” them never works, especially since you probably care more about what happens to them than they do.”

It’s good I already mentioned pick-up and ‘game’ because it actually follows the stages of gaslighting abuse.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/communication-success/201704/the-7-stages-gaslighting-in-relationships

I’ll illustrate with examples, where possible.
1. Women are worthless. Counter: then why are you obsessed with them? You don’t base your life around something worthless. [They don’t want women to be happy without them and without being their hookers, hence the contradiction with the Western value of liberty and tradition of not being promiscuous and degenerate (applies to both sexes). They implicitly believe ‘Women should be forced to sleep with me’. Hold up there, Mohammed! They bought into the lie of porn – all women want you and they’re ‘playing hard to get’. Sexual entitlement is the secret of a loser’s desperation. The women in porn are paid to act interested, even they’re not. They also conveniently forget a supposedly desirable harem is marriage, with Middle Eastern duties on the man, the man is 100% financially responsible and the women don’t work. They refuse to get married once and object to that polygamy because it reduces nubile supply.]
2. Women are (various bad things, implying men are not). No proof, no comparison of data from both sexes. Long opinion pieces. Counter: Differentiate that from sexism. [Third-wave Feminists do this stuff too, but everyone’s already explaining that.] Negging doesn’t even work, just look at their ‘success rate’. The terms are so Orwell.
3. (They literally tell their followers –cult– to escalate whatever criticism comes their way after attention-whoring –peacocking-, so I don’t need to put anything here. They literally use the word escalate, even when what they’re escalating e.g. ‘kino’, code for physical contact, is illegal aka assault). Search PUA+game+”escalate”
4. Aside from continuation long after it’s socially acceptable, stalking, doxing and harassment, I’d also include dogpiles and other ways to get their internet boyfriends involved to keep punching down. Because punching down, 5 or more against 1 is so much better? ‘Amused mastery’ isn’t what it sounds like, it’s the denial and dickishness women uncannily and universally despise about just these guys, since they refuse to admit any useful point (brick wall) and deny-deny-deny while claiming women are the ones denying reality. They laugh at the frustration, like children, oblivious to how stupid they objectively look (also to other men).
5. Google “dread game” it’s literally this stage. Seriously.
6. ‘Beta game’ aka pretending to be a decent person for a little while. Narcissists do this already but male borderlines need to be told how to imitate it, to get the supply they need. Most ‘game’ is feigning K-selected characteristics that are evolutionally desirable while hiding what they really are, that’s why they burn out like the psychopaths they stupidly admire – it’s one big act. They pretend being fake men for years is a strength and sunk cost means they never admit it. That’s what all the ‘macho man’ fake masculinity spiel is, they’re trying to convince themselves of the delusion. Ask them how their mother’s doing. Better yet, ask her WTH happened.
7. Look up all the quotes and forum topics on ‘game’ sites describing all women as whores that want to be raped and choked, specifically. Sometimes beaten, with fists or a belt. They really do think this, they’ve projected all their desensitized sick porn habits on the Evil Lilith Judaism myth. Men don’t dominate women, they never have, they work with women on mutually agreed upon goals, the sexes cooperate or those examples die. They’re thinking of sexual domination because they don’t think with Upstairs Brain.

In effect, these males want sex slavery without the balls to run their own life, a Mommy replacement. Remember, one of Mohammed’s ‘wives’ (captive slaves) poisoned him.

They’re not joking when they say they don’t want women to have rights because they don’t see women as human. In which case, their sexuality is dubious (bestiality? which religion is that common to again?) and they can’t expect women to do any work, including childcare. Let alone their ‘share’ of the housework.

‘Game’ proponents pretend to teach the socially inept how to find wife material. They lie to other men to make shekels and seem respectable. That’s why I did the still-popular post on What does it get you? Less than the average guy, guessing. That’s without going into the brown caste of most game practitioners, desperate in their White and Blonde fetishes/Fevers. But sure, it’s the women gagging for you, huh? They don’t select for the quality or marriage, those males (not men) don’t see it, don’t value or respect it and couldn’t keep it if it managed to fall from the sky to their lap. They sexually select (DARWIN) for cheapness, easiness and sluttiness. No wonder they keep finding women to be sexually damaged, emotionally disturbed (the ones attracted to them) and disloyal. They’re signalling what they are. Birds of a feather…

Remember!

The one common denominator in all your failed relationships, is you.

Roosh V quotes for fun

Try these on for size. Share around promiscuously if you like.

rooshquote8rapesatirearticle rooshvquote1 rooshvquote2 rooshvquote2happy rooshvquote3 rooshvquote4 rooshvquote5 rooshvquote6 rooshvquote7 rooshvquote9 rooshvquote10 rooshvquote11 rooshvquote12 rooshvquote13 rooshvquote14 rooshvquote15 rooshvquote17 rooshvquote18dating rooshvquote19tea rooshvquote20goodmarry rooshvquote21sextourism rooshvquote22inspirationalfeminazi rooshvquote23 rooshvquote24 rooshvquote25bang rooshvquote26

rooshvquote27 rooshvquote28 rooshvquote29needwomen rooshvquote30 rooshvquotesexcardio16

All these are SATC quotes, with the exception of one by Audrey Hepburn and one by Marilyn Monroe.
With minimal editing. I bet it was hard to tell.

The manosphere is the male equivalent of Carrie Bradshaw. If you find a good woman, you don’t need books on Text Games and Juicing Recipes. If you have kids, you don’t have time to give traffic views to their clickbait. You have unplugged from their system. The PUA scam relies on you being Forever Alone. Like its proponents.

QED.

Here’s a real one.

“I’m not white. Why should I care about the future of white societies?”

source screencap
waronwhitegirls.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/anti-white-rok-rooshv-manosphere-neomasculinity2.jpg

Dwell on that while he’s cosplaying conservative. He’s about as right-wing as Lindy West.

He’s playing you to make more money. He’ll say anything, he’s a shill.

http://aaronsleazy.blogspot.ca/2015/01/is-roosh-banging-hookers-in-third-world.html

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/daryush-valizadeh-top-10-most-insane-quotes-return-kings-leader-roosh-v-1541792

the odds that I will meet a new girl who I genuinely care for and maybe even love will be about the same as me winning the grand prize of a scratch ticket lottery game.

Your future following kebab.
The doxxer (SJW tactics) got doxxed by none other than Anonymous.

http://www.forgetthebox.net/when-the-doxer-gets-doxed-anonymous-shares-roosh-vs-info-with-the-world-201502051/

The SJWs have a rare victory in common with us.

http://www.rooshv.com/does-armpit-odor-make-me-irresistible-to-women

Take the pozz. The whole load.

Self-styled alphas more prone to depression

Typical ‘blokes’ who see themselves as competitive, dominant playboys ‘at greater risk of depression’

“In general, individuals who conformed to strongly masculine norms tended to have poorer mental health and less favourable attitudes toward seeking psychological help, although the results differed depending on specific types of masculine norms.”
“While all typical “lads” were found to be at greater risk for mental health issues, the researchers found particular traits put a bloke at greatest risk.
They were self-reliance, the pursuit of playboy behaviour, and power over women.”

positive, negative, negative
creative, destructive, destructive
Men need women, punishing us for this is bound to eat away at them.

“The masculine norms of playboy and power over women are the norms most closely associated with sexist attitudes.
“The robust association between conformity to these two norms and negative mental health-related outcomes underscores the idea that sexism is not merely a social injustice, but may also have a detrimental effect on the mental health of those who embrace such attitudes.”

Using and then disdaining someone evolutionally in need of your protection and love (femininity) is sure to cause self-loathing. Guilt builds up over time into shame and then self-loathing, which is often projected to the trigger.
Sexism is really a neurosis, a rationalization of one’s personal potency. See Inferiority and Superiority Complexes.
It’s a lot of pressure to outdo billions of people, still living. They are terrified of mano-e-mano competition. Socially, other men terrify them, and women sense this cowardice, as a weakness to pick on something weaker still – usually women, sometimes animals or children (sadist hunters, serial killers and pedophiles). Misogynists get very threatened by historical stories of female success, dismissed as impossible, or the merest prospect of any kind of meritocratic empowerment, feeling unable to complete on a level playing field. The player lifestyle is one of shame and deception. They burnout and end up alone, having lost many friends to the lifestyle too. Don’t pity the predators, they chose their fate. What you sow, you shall reap. Karma is a bitch.

Harassment still illegal but apparently women need extra protection

This is silly. I saw some anti-fems complaining about it and it made no sense

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/county-in-uk-makes-it-a-hate-crime-to-upset-women/article/2596356

It’s already illegal.

Harassment, assault, stalking.

I got a tingling sensation in my Bullshit O’Meter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_Nottingham#Ethnicity

28.46% non-white.

There’s your necessity.

In an effort to crack down on the alleged “tidal wave of abuse and harassment” women face every day, the county’s police force is now considering things like catcalling and pickup lines to be a hate crime if they are directed toward a woman from a man.

They’re never directed the other way and those things are already illegal, they just made it official.
Because you don’t see it the other way, they didn’t mention it.
However, a woman groping a man on public transport? Illegal.
A woman stalker? They happen to celebrities most famously, illegal.
Women being chucked out by a bouncer for refusing to take No for a reply? I’ve seen that more often than the man equivalent because women assume they won’t be hurt or punished for doing it. Illegal, police can be called.

The law is being applied equally but the crime is not practiced by both sexes in the same manner.

includes behavior targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman.

antisocial behaviour
already illegal
however, hate crime is largely hinged on targeting, so yes, it would be, just like the Rotherham rapists going for white girls
it’s part of their motivation, since nobody can help what they were born
we can’t suddenly become men whatever surgery is available
the anti-fems are usually smarter than this…

Of course, that could include anything a woman deems offensive or unwanted from a man. It’s completely subjective.

Exactly. All crimes are on a case-by-case basis. We have these things called judges and juries to sort it out? Not public opinion, or even personal opinion?
Assault is completely subjective according to our law.
Men commit most crimes, this is an expected pattern that they would be the main perp. In any crime. Based on stats.

Newsweek reports that now “everything from verbal comments to unwanted physical approaches” will be considered a hate crime. Send a woman a text when she doesn’t like you? Hate crime. Tell your female friend she looks good today? Hate crime.

That’s hysterical over-reaction. From ‘men’. [or someone who panders to the insecure ones]
You are not forced to make lewd comments (always illegal) nor block someone’s physical space or prevent them from moving, say by grabbing (always illegal). Even our police cannot do those things, see kettling, they’re wearing body cams now. Pick-up endorses these things as building rapport, being an alpha dog and ‘escalating’ ‘kino’. …If the internet told you to jump off a cliff….
How could sending a text be illegal if she gave you her number? Did you take the number? Illegal.
If she’s your friend, why would she report you? How is ‘looking good’ an insult??? [This one nonsense example makes more sense further down when you see the ‘journalist’]

The MGTOW-pandering lot want something to complain about again. This isn’t even in your country. You said something had to be done post-Rotherham, this is part of it. Mind your own shit. You have riots, plural.

The only thing mentioned in the Newsweek article that even remotely sounds like it merits the time of police officers is when a man takes a photo of a woman without her consent. Depending on the type of photo and reason for taking it, that can be disgusting.

We don’t base our laws on how it sounds like to skanky Americans?
Without her consent is the entire frickin’ point. Without. As in, cannot obtain. As in, denied.

Erm it isn’t about what makes the man feel comfortable – that’s the point. If you go up to any stranger and cause public disturbance they could report you, whatever your sex or sexuality or fetishes. Begging is illegal, so is soliciting. This is in keeping with the antique laws, old as paper. We are not a high trust society. You can’t expect to be welcomed by strangers, that is unreasonable, entitled and egoistic/emotional. Women are the ones being approached, not their choice, 99% of the time it’s that way around, the ‘men’ in question do NOT listen when told by a fellow citizen to respect their right to be left in peace because of this shit they read online, and then, as these twerps remind us, all women are in physical danger of rape, so we need to be extra vigilant to potential rapists and protect ourselves.

Pick one. Stranger danger or men do their damn job if they’re claiming to be so masculine.
How do we protect ourselves? Well, we banned guns, most knives, we can’t touch one another, so words will have to do. Fire with fire.

That includes telling a creepy stranger who clearly only wants a free hooker and to comment on your body like parts at a butcher to go fuck himself. Men don’t like being treated this way either, they find it humiliating, demeaning and emasculating.* Real life is not porn. There is no entitlement to sex. They could just leave a card and say nothing but where does it call that illegal? Nowhere! Instead they want to reduce the rights of women in the First World. Unmarried women, because it’s less likely they’ll get beaten up by relations, but I’ve seen it tried on married ones too. Those people are trash. Do not defend them, even vicariously.
Those photos are often posted online, another crime. Upskirts on porn sites for example. Faces are shown, identifying information like locations and bus routes. Do most men wear skirts? No, but I’m sure the law would also be applied to upskirts of a man in a kilt if you want to get decked by a Scotsman. Please, go ahead, internet toughie.

There was no intent to disrespect the unknown woman, but now, just because a man took the photo, that could be a hate crime.

Yanks and your emphasis on bloody opinions. High off your own gas. That sounds like a great legal defense, I didn’t mean to. Truly, superb. I didn’t mean to corner her and grab her and refuse to leave her alone when asked. There was no intent to disrespect in any of that behaviour, judge.

Filming in public is illegal, I covered this with pick-up artists filming in London.
Photos can be incitement of harassment or simply derogatory, libelous to the reputation. Especially with lewd comments. Getting the picture? Actions have consequences. If it gives you a sexual thrill from a stranger, it’s probably illegal e.g. frottage. Your ignorance of our law does not excuse that.

All those whiny outrage feminist articles that most people laugh off as first world problems are now influencing actual criminal law.

Look up the actual criminal law.
Fucking spergs. Shoot these people with the anarchists, they’re a waste of air.
Protecting people is so bigoted! ~ retards

If a Muslim comes up to your 9 year old niece and asks a lewd question, this law would protect her. We don’t have guns and almost no right to physically defend ourselves. What else is there, darling?
It’s a reaction to the cultures they freely admit are truly misogynistic. As in, women as cattle-whores. With no choice, so keep trying it on. Any unchaperoned woman is fair game to rape. Okay, side with those people, but don’t pretend your incentive is First World freedoms.

There is no arguing against this if you look it up. Journalists do research, not this vacuous bitching.

Shockingly, domestic abuse won’t be considered a hate crime, even though it is an objectively offensive crime, because it has its own established procedure. Go figure.

Number one. OPINION IS NOT LAW. Ahem.

It won’t be considered a (new) crime (on the books) because it’s already a crime with all the full statutes to cover it, isn’t that TERRIBLE?!

Checkmate, feminazis! You already protect women in the comfort of their own home!

what wtf wut confused shocked are you seeing this omfg how

Also, men are protected from being battered by their spouses too! Because that happens and the law recognizes it! The UK legal system hates men and this is PROOF! ahahahahaha!

“Understanding this as a hate crime will help people to see the seriousness of these incidents and hopefully encourage more women to come forward and report offences.”

Guess the perps. Why would they be afraid of reporting white men in their own country?
Because it isn’t mostly white men committing these crimes.
It’s those who prey on white meat. Sure, screw the harassers whatever their race, same with all criminals, but sexual crime isn’t fine if the perp is a white male. There are no Get Out Of Jail Free cards, unless you’re really arguing for some kind of institutional, legally valid white privilege?

“Women and girls face a tidal wave of abuse and harassment every day. Our law has to send a clear signal that this is not acceptable. It is a crime.”

That woman quoted as if she is wrong, is correct. It’s a re-codification and clarification of the law, this happens locally all the time (case law?). I may think hate crime logic is flawed, severely, but if you’re gonna have it, it’d be a good idea for places like Sweden or Germany to take it up, don’t you think?
The purpose is to DETER more serious crimes, by people who already don’t respect the law of this country.

…who could that be?????

It protects the white women because the men aren’t doing it.

omg really wtf go away no audrey

This will become common, and necessary, as things get worse.

Sure, blame us. Blame the victims. You want tradition, though, right? As long as you don’t have to get off your arse.

It must be nice to have so little actual crime that the police can focus on such things.

It sounds like the nasal tone of a bitchy pajama boy. I could also go into a Swiss bank wearing a ski mask and holding a black water pistol. I don’t because that is a stupid thing to do. Do not act like a rapist if you are not a rapist. If women must protect ourselves, the law must support us in that endeavor because the men forsook their sex’s historical duty.
If women are victims, should the police laugh it off? But when the NYE attacks happened it was all “they’re hurting our women! we must stop this! we need more laws!”

The real question: why do you assume your behaviour toward women would get you into legal trouble?

Wouldn’t the judge let you off, if you truly did nothing wrong?
It’s like the ones who say I just wanted to buy her a drink as if that was really It and spiking drinks doesn’t happen. Women are not under any obligation to accept attentions from men, it is dangerous. That’s why men threaten women with rape online, when we can’t even see who it is but they can see us. Playing I’m Not Like the Other Guys snowflake routine doesn’t work, because you are a stranger. The rapists say that too. The ones so nice they have to remind you/tell you how Nice they are, because you can’t be trusted to form that opinion by yourself. Nobody should be given the benefit of the doubt where matters of physical safety are concerned. This isn’t even a sexual point, it’s common sense.

Freedom of association. Freedom. As in, everyone. Nothing to do with voting rights (suffrage was universal, not female) or emotionality (ostrogen is not the emotion hormone, if anything that’s testosterone with clear forensic links to crime and mental instability). There’s really no such thing as too much oestrogen in women, and in men it’s actually too little testosterone, rather than oestrogen, causing their health problems. HBD doesn’t care about your feels. “Estrogen is partly responsible for creating healthy sperm” #science

Do you remember what the excuse was, of the Rotherham rapists to the police?
They’re our girlfriend.
How was this possible?

They picked her up. Between ‘home’ and school. Pick-ups. Literal. In taxis. 

They go on to mention an online poll, about online stuff.
As if that has anything to do with this.
Online. Aka not in public. Not a law. Not even English.

Then-

That actually makes this law misandrist, since only men can be the perpetrators even though women are guilty as well.

It doesn’t say that and case law, a single case, could easily disprove it. With the help of the Equality Act, you silly Yank.
‘That’ says nothing but triggered opinion. You and your specious non sequiturs.

As we’ve seen time and time again from outrage feminists [American] on social media [online], any criticism of a woman is misogyny [patently false]. That would make this article misogynist [if you say so?], but I wouldn’t be prosecuted [but…you just said… it broke a law] — not just because I don’t live in Nottinghamshire [you don’t need to, it’s called a holiday?] — but also because I’m a woman. [nope, a lesbian would also be guilty of harassing women, you utter prat]

This guy (sperg logic, more masculine) is as retarded as Lindy West.
Even she wouldn’t go that far into Whataboutism derailment combined with What IF.
I often slag off male opinions on this topic when they’re wrong, because men are usually the only ones discussing these things. This is an example of a dippy conservative cuck, shilling for shekels like the best Jezebel tarts.

Wait, so all this being triggered is still from a woman, objecting to misogyny objections, even though there’s no feminists in sight?

….Wow America. You used to be cool.
She’s actually siding on the same side as ISIS, because America.

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

It’s like a Yank right-wing Claudia Boleyn, she assumes that anything protecting women is automatically bad and wrong based on her political position (more insulting, as true conservatives do not hate women) but actually Claudia is more logical than this person.

It’s almost as if we abandoned our moral standards and manners, and then panicked over their absence and are now trying to bring them back in the form of legislation.

WE?

OUR?

Whither this liberal universalism henceforth stench?

Who is dis bich?

Let’s take bets, shall we?

Well, that explains everything.

Well, that explains everything.

Her message is Don’t listen to stupid women – unless they’re me.

She’s jealous of the women who actually get hit on, regardless of the danger involved. No wonder she hates feminists. Narcissism of small differences, isn’t it?

Spot the difference.

Spot the difference.

We have a self-hating women vying for male attention by insulting herself like a male feminist/self-hating beta and a man-hating woman who wants to fuck men out of revenge by taking their own money to make it possible.

“I’m on Instagram because of peer pressure” reads her Instagram bio.
Yes, her politics are informed by similar concerns.

She is living proof that she is wrong but sees no contradiction.

Women don’t think like me. aka I’m special. You’re a woman. Technically. Proving women can and do, in fact, have differing opinions. Like men. I’m careful to say feminist when I mean feminist, not woman. It’s silly to assume someone always takes a position for sexual attention (like White Knighting) as if there are opinions you can’t hold for logical reasons, but in this case…

Why do I think she’s attention-seeking for her career?
Well before, a few years ago, she was covering such important political topics as milk.

http://townhall.com/columnists/asheschow/2012/08/13/when_did_milk_become_bad_for_you

I will refrain from the obvious joke about guzzling approval.

She also cosplays. According to search engines.

I wonder, if a Muslim were to harass her in this costume, whether she’d be asking for it?

Tbf, she denies it. I doubt that’s her arse neither. Otherwise she’d know about harassment firsthand.

Whatever, point still stands. If that was her in the picture, feel free to harass her whatever she is wearing or doing or even if she asks you to stop, because women are never legitimately the victims of bad men since feminists exist.

All men are good and would never harass, stalk or rape women!
Ignore those pesky crime data reports!

That isn’t just as retarded as the All Victim narrative!
No Victims, heard it here first.

*http://metro.co.uk/2015/06/06/this-is-what-happened-when-a-woman-catcall-men-5233425/
They only included the ones in this reel where men liked it. Try it in real life. Ask random men to smile in the street and watch their Wow you creep reaction. Whoever does it. Have a load of regular feminists go up to men and paw at them, building kino. I said if they wanted to ruin Roosh V, they’d follow him around copying him. Forever. And distribute his step-by-steps in public flyers. Well, if it’s legal and morally acceptable, no problem right? So they can’t complain when other men hit on them because that’s misandrist. Men get to hit on whoever they want, including other men. Watch what happens when we take the brakes off gay rapists.

harassment

No, that is exactly what men do nowadays. They call it banter or lad culture, it isn’t. They walk up to women and speak like that, like they’re in porn. I find recording them makes them go away because they know there’s something to be ashamed of. This law is supposed to make them confine that stuff to anonymous internet comments where it’s less likely to escalate and easier to prove. Young men talking the way rappers only used to get away with in music videos.

It’s an American expectation based on tipping culture, antidepressant culture with pills to make you smiley and the power dynamic of servers. A random woman in the street is not angling for a tip, any tip. A neutral expression is not sad. I once heard a model describe it thus when recounting one instance, “No, I won’t smile at you because I’m not serving you. In fact, I’m better than you because you need my approval and you’ll never have it.”
If women don’t smile at you, maybe you’re the reason?

Any random person talking to you in public is weird. Doesn’t need to be sexual.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/northerner-terrorised-london-by-saying-hello-20151001102473

the world is not America
women do need protection, that isn’t saying men do not
also, women need a labour ward, is this sexist?

these people are still crying sexism for any acknowledgement of differences but also trying to argue the feminist crying is wrong because logic and differences? Idiots.

Mike Cernovich: Potemkin Alpha Male

someone who threatens to sue everyone isn’t a threat
I can’t believe Dick Measuring Twitter trolls are still a thing.

“why was this high-rolling attorney wasting his time with juicing e-books and blogging?” they always try to push themselves as worldly James Bond types…. the real JB didn’t need to cheat and he married happily, they can’t keep a good girl
and juicing is dumb, you need the fibre whole to balance out the fructose or you’ll die like Steve Jobs but no, they want their Ponzi get money/pussy easy scams and wonder why lasting $$$ elude them as they chase short-term prospects like psychopaths
“is a Potemkin alpha male whose success in life is as artificially inflated as his testosterone levels” they’re the male equivalent of mommy bloggers but instead of recipes and crafts, it’s supplements and angry rants about how Women Ruin Everything and Men are Innocent Victims of Vagina Magic – this is why other men scoff at them and they have no real power, they bitch like gay men and thankfully they are genetic suicides so, who cares?

imagine being so fragile in your identity you base your entire life around bravado and homoerotic posturing for other men?

my personal favourites complain about immigrants while being sex tourists and think living in Asia on pittance is ‘success’ to be envied – in the middle of nowhere, sure, everyone cares, nobodies with a diary male edition

it’s funny how they go on about female gold diggers when they have no money

datalounge has less drama but we’re supposed to believe these are the Real Men?

and how can masturbation be invented by Marxists? literally how

https://storify.com/SJWIlluminati/juicebro-is-fucking-nuts

that is hilarious, I have spread it to everyone
are they so full of shit because they don’t eat fibre?
it’s lifestyle blogging like the girl who goes to India and stands in front of a temple
“Twitter battle” used seriously
final note, why are the ragequit r-type anger issues guys, always the ones claiming to be either cynics, epicureans and/or stoics? #signalling

they aren’t even right-wing, as you can tell by their lifestyle, but anti-happy for groups they hate (currently SJWs) and that kinda dishonesty is the reason the manosphere was an abortion of Sexual Revolution signalling, these of Calhoun’s Beautiful Ones too vain, dumb and full of cum to be adults
Go Galt on desperate attention whores, whatever their politics or lifestyle, you’ll instantly feel relieved and it rustles their triggered jimmies the most

Internet Famous Angry Men

It’s been about a year since I last wrote about Michael C. Cernovich, the part-time lawyer, full-time Internet bum who’s publicly threatened to sue me (that is, when he hasn’t got me confused with Zoe Quinn.) Back then, I smelled a rat – Cernovich claimed to be a successful lawyer, yet he was seemingly no longer was actively practicing law just a year after finally getting his law license; and the address he gave as his law offices turned out to be a rental condominium in a residential neighborhood. Looking at it on Google Street View, there was nothing about the property which suggested it was really a law office, yet it was Cernovich’s address of record to the CA State Bar, and theoretically the place clients sent this big-shot lawyer their checks.

It was one of several details of Cernovich’s life that didn’t add up: why was this high-rolling attorney…

View original post 1,069 more words

Roosh’s press conference, a breakdown

This will be brief but I wanted to highlight how ridiculous this is.
He thinks this makes him look good when he’s actually taking a dive like Anita Sarkeesian, he’s literally playing Victim Pro.

cool mocking shades yes peace

About as smooth as gravel.

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/transcript-rooshv-press-conference-6216.html

Bear in mind the AS comparison, I’ll come back to it. Rebel outsider or precious victim, you can’t be both.
Bearing in mind, he said this before, to repeat myself;

https://archive.is/oh4Zo

I can’t say I’m angry at their coverage. The reason is that there is nothing the media can do anymore to hurt me, and even if they paint me as a baby murderer, I will still gain readers because of it. When you are in an anti-fragile position, you’re immune to all manner of attacks, and so it’s the coverage alone that helps me because it gets my ideas across to those who have yet to see it.”

Ready? Here we go.
(Also if someone wants to shop his face on that chicken, please be my guest).

Roosh: All right, are you ready? Is that a yes? Oh, we have a new one. Where do you work from?

Female Reporter: Um, Martha Stewart?

Roosh: Martha Stewart?

Female Reporter: Yes.

(Laughter)

Roosh: Okay, yeah, sure. I don’t know how she got in here. Someone must have told her. All right, so first I’m going to make a statement and then you can ask me anything. Cool?

Insulting a woman for doing her job for yet another woman is an excellent way to prove you aren’t a misogynist, what a way to begin. Someone give him a speech course for the Muslim equivalent of Christmas, please.

All right, so the world has gone insane in the past week.

Gaslighting the world press. I don’t think that’s gonna work.
But yes I’m sure the whole world is at fault, not you. #whatnarcissism

Why? Number one, I had organized meet ups around the world for men to enjoy a social happy hour to meet in private and talk about anything. Work, politics, girls, just to meet.

Just to meet. Is that why all the security? Code names, really?
When you say politics, is that a yes or no to foreign sedition?
When you say girls, (and not women,) do that include tuition on how to get them into bed when otherwise they might not?

Okay? Number two, a year ago I wrote an article How to Stop Rape. This article, to a 10-year-old, was obvious that I didn’t intend to legalize rape or cause harm against women.

He sounds like he’s implying his average reader has the IQ of a 10yo. It wasn’t even his worst article, I’ve covered his degeneracy, completely serious and claiming to be truthful, and I believe the Daily Mail used that post to cherry-pick a quote, I recognized my own work.
There’s a new concept called Schrodinger’s Douchebag, they’ll say something raw and depending on the reaction, will reveal whether they were serious (and edgy) or ‘only joking’ and blame you for what they said. As in, how could you think I meant the thing I composed in my head? I don’t think that’s gonna work on… what? Millions of people? A billion? Blame-shifting only works on the type of immature girl he prizes himself on targeting.

But starting on Sunday, a lot of you have lied by saying that I am a pro-rape advocate.

That was literally the point of the article. Thought experiment or no.
You did write IN advocacy of it. And specifically rape of women, which you never philosophically justified. Philosophers still advocate their positions, even when mocking them. Read a book?
I want to pull a Diogenes and hold aloft a chicken *cough* while proclaiming;
“Behold! I’ve brought you a man.” *Roosh softly cucking*

He wants women to get hurt!

You said it would teach them a lesson. How can that possibly be misinterpreted?
He’s gonna turn into a slang term at this rate, it’ll go from douche to Roosh the Douche and eventually just Roosh.

If you think I’m being harsh, he actually said: “Bad encounters are sure to occur, but these can be learning experiences for the poorly trained woman

Is this how feminists feel all the time? Victim blaming, minimizing, speaking of women like dogs, no blame on the criminal while he’s claiming victim in his own speech.

and  “The exception for public rape is aimed at those seedy and deranged men who randomly select their rape victims on alleys and jogging trails”
…unlike those seedy enough to use pick-up? getting them too drunk to consent? drugs not out of the question?

And then the third thing, you said the meet ups are about rapists. They want to gather to learn how to rape. They are going to exchange tips. Some of you have called it a rape rally! What the hell is that? A rape rally? So because of that I’ve been all over the world in terms of the news. Over 100 articles have been written.

This is especially interesting because he didn’t actually deny it. He’s catastrophized it (for questioning his *snort* moral fibre) but he didn’t say, ‘no, I’m not going to teach them how to take sex from unwilling women.’

He needs to be very careful about this because if he keeps implying legal action and talking big, a lawsuit might be started by a larger party to get in first, setting events off, and everything about him will come out. Possibly some past rape accusations such as when he lies about his name, as he admits to doing. Pick-up might even be outlawed from a case that large, defined as hate speech as I already explained the legal precedent in seduction law and fraud.

The result is what? I’m currently the most hated man in the world.

Please.

don draper crying baby wah wah wah

You’re like those celebrities who complain when cameras follow them.
You choose the work, you choose the attention. You don’t get to pick only the positive attention, big baby. And he slags off women for being whiny victims, can we say Projection?

Governments from all over the world have talked about me. Australia has tried to keep me out.

It’s their country, entitled prick. You were saying all about the perils of immigration in other articles.

They called up their Navy to keep me out because they thought that I was going to get in through a private yacht.

Cos you said you’d go by boat, sneaky little liar. He misses out, ‘forgets’ anything that makes him look culpable.

So the Navy got called up. In England, the House of Commons debated me for half an hour to say how I’m a bad man who shouldn’t be allowed entry.

Yes, I know, I’ve been there.

dean winchester supernatural evil smirk lol laughing amused

Where do you think they got that idea? You said you hated London, you told men never to go there (we need our tourist money), after all, why should we let you back? Nobody owes you a visa. Then you go on to slag off Glasgow for having Scottish soul. Roosh makes friends wherever he goes, how he does it, nobody knows….

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/daryush-valizadeh-watch-uk-parliament-debate-banning-repulsive-us-pickup-artist-1541972
“If criminal offences have been committed – including incitement of violence against women – then the government would expect local police forces to deal with any offenders appropriately.” That’s your formal warning, FYI.
Also, the sarcastic tone to naming “Return of Kings” is because they’re slagging off a real-life monarchy. In case you didn’t catch that. You bitches write about it, we live it. GSTQ.
Are you oppressed or not? If so, you can’t be surprised the Man (the local law you PUAs keep ignoring) is keeping you down. If not, you’re a liar.

Mayors from everywhere, Canada, have said were going to keep him out (like they could anyway they are just a mayor, a mayor can’t keep someone out). The governor of Texas said the same thing. Police from everywhere said that all meetups will be monitored.

Public meetups. If you meet up IN PUBLIC, it’s a public meetup. That’s what words mean.

A private meetup for men is going to be monitored. 1984 is here.

It isn’t private. Anyone could show up. It isn’t on private property, at best rented. Land laws aren’t the same, it’s a semi-public space, so banning anyone on demo grounds is illegal. As he admitted, there is a political motive I’m sure intelligence services will be looking into, and those need to be filed and registered with the proper authorities, ahead of time. Even SJWs have to do this. You can’t go to a foreign land and expect their laws won’t apply to you…. unless you’re a Roosh.

Worst of all, my family’s address was put on the Internet through the hacking group Anonymous

Even better, give them a pitying look and smirk no matter what they say.

ah, that name again…

comes up a lot doesn’t it?

and your colleagues at the Daily Mail confirmed the doxx and say that I my mom’s meatloaf everyday.

DM is a gossip rag, as the writers will freely admit down the pub. They like ‘spoons. Nobody takes it seriously. They post on the Queen, cancer and various outrage porn. Most of the writers are preening middle-class toffs, like the Sun, which is toffs being ironic. The Guardian is toffs being hilariously serious.

Dozens of threats have come in.

Ooh, dozens. Is that more or less than AS? ZQ? Is this a competition now?
He said multiple times we shouldn’t take online bullying seriously, that the threats weren’t real so these SJWs should get over it.

Someone said that they’re going to burn my house down but save my mom. So I’m glad, but you have to understand that your work and the work of your own colleagues have incited a mob based on lies that has put my family in danger. If they get hurt right now, God forbid, it’s because of you. It’s because you didn’t read a damn article, you misinterpreted, and now we have this rage mob to where, as you can see, I had to hide this. I told you don’t tell anyone.

He’s a thirty-something year old MAN and he’s still pointing the finger and blaming other people for his fuck-ups?
Notice he doesn’t blame the victim when it might be him?

I must state right now that not a single woman has been hurt by me.

He didn’t use the r-word… odd diversion…
And the oven-worthy post proves that emphatically false.

I’ve never been accused of rape.

Give it time.

I’ve never been charged.

That’s… not the same thing…..

No follower of mine has read something by me and then gone to rape because I know if they did hurt a woman it would be all over the news. Not a single woman has been hurt.

Big talk.

Yet, there is a real rape mob somewhere and there is media from the country where that mob is. Who wants to volunteer what country has an active rape mob? What happened on New Year’s Eve in Cologne?

Typical rabbit.
You’re ganging up on me, you should feelbad! Don’t look at me, look at that guy! That other guy! Let’s you and him fight! [Roosh is a woman confirmed]
Ignore the Muslim predator writing books encouraging brown men to take Europe, country by country, calling all white women whores for these other Muslims in Europe, going country to country, calling white women whores! That makes me doing it O.K.! Right?

also, “active rape mob” – subconsciously, he’s thinking he runs the passive rape mob, who could be that overt about it but prefer trickery, and that makes it morally acceptable

Does anyone know? Someone? On New Year’s Eve mobs of men assaulted women, they raped them, and what did you guys do? You covered it up.

that was just the German Government, wrong audience, get a lesson pls

So when a real rape happens that goes against the agenda of your boss, you actually hide it. But then when no rapes happen and I try to do a meetup you lose your shit.

Nothing happened because you cancelled it, can, can he hear himself?

So I just wanted to come here just to state that not only are you guys not honest in your reporting of me but that no one has been harmed and when real harm takes place you don’t say anything. That is not right and not fair. I pray to God that nothing happens to anyone that is close to me and if it does it’s your fault. That’s my statement.

No, who started it?

Typical rabbit.

I might’ve talked shit but he punched me! I might’ve slapped him but then he hit back! Wah wah wah! I could never be the instigator!

I’m surprised he isn’t crying. You can get fake tear stuff online.

All right, is there anything else?

Reporter: Why do you think people think of you as a rapist?

Roosh: They need a target to get all the rage that the citizens have to put it on someone that doesn’t conflict with the agenda of your bosses and the ruling establishment. Roosh, go after him, it doesn’t matter if he gets hurt but we can’t go against our immigrant agenda. We can’t go against the feminist agenda. So we need to get the masses (the idiots who believe the stuff that you write) and put it on to something else. So you put it on me. I’m just a scapegoat. They are just using me.

Bear in mind what I re-quoted up top.
He asked for it.
He really wanted it.
He was gagging for it.

Yes, those are common appeals to the jury from rapists.

You know what really bothers me here? How low, how cheap, how evil, does a person have to be to use rape victims like that? For his own ‘agenda’? As a Get Out of Jail Free card? Not even that, a Criticism-Free Card.

But, I’m going to harness this. I’m going to harness all this coverage that you guys are giving me and convert it to money and women. That’s what I’m going to do. That’s the job that I have to do. I’m getting emails from a lot of girls right now and I plan (once this drama dies down if I can survive it) I may have to get in touch with them. That’s what you given me. You have made me one of the most famous men in the world. Granted, it was a lie. It was a lie. But hey, this is where we are right now so I’m going to work with what you gave me.

IF I did it……

….and he’s going to keep doing it. Officially, after this point, he deserves no empathy whoever he tries to rope in. He chooses to continue doing the same thing, and in an SJW-esque display of madness, expects a different result.

Female Reporter: Do you acknowledge that any of your writing might be genuinely offensive or upsetting to some people?

Roosh: So what?

He thinks that is a macho response. Pause. Drink it in.

American Psycho is the best satire of the 20th century

Like a little ghetto bitch.
Yeah, I called you a ho, so what? What are you gonna do about it, fight me? #seconds later# omg I can’t believe you hit me you crazy bitch!

If you make your private life public information, we’re allowed to judge. Again, you put your name, face and intimate life out there (in nauseating detail). You rejected your own legal right to privacy on those topics.

Female Reporter: Do you blame all of their reaction solely on media misinterpretation?

Roosh: I blame them for not reading what I write, for taking the mentality of a 10-year-old kid.

The ever-mature, You’re just too stupid to appreciate my genius! emo kid line.

Female Reporter: Your writing is offensive on its face.

Roosh: So what? So what? I have freedom of speech.

in AMERICA

in AMERICA

#grabs speakerphone#

IN AMERICAAAAAA.

(aka not where you wanted to hold your meetings)

Be offended, good, that means my writing got you.

3edgy5u

spot the fallacy: if you’re upset, you must be wrong

answer: non-sequitur

Female Reporter: So you acknowledge that you did provoke some of this yourself.

Roosh: I acknowledge that as a writer my job is to get attention and I did it. Right? But so what if you are offended. So what if I make fun of you? Is that we’re at right now that we can’t write things that hurt people’s feelings?

We’ve always been at that point, I wouldn’t expect you to understand. This is called the First World. It’s called etiquette and it’s the reason your ancestors came here from that Muslim shithole where gang rape is a fun family sport. How has nobody mentioned his sister? Must I do everything?

You can write whatever you want.
You can’t complain about the reaction.
Except you are. Is he borderline cos that would explain the entitlement and the constantly striving after a (neomasculine) identity.

Good, get offended, feel something, but don’t lie. Don’t lie. And that’s what you guys have done.

Don’t lie, says the guy who lies about his name.

Male Reporter: So do you consider yourself a victim in this scenario?

Roosh: You know what? No. [acts like it] I take full responsibility for everything that I have done but that doesn’t mean that I can’t state what you did wrong. [shifting the blame] I’m not saying “oh, I wish I could turn back the hands of time. I wish I didn’t write that article.” No, I wrote it. It came from my mind and it’s going to stay. But if you did something wrong then I get to  call you out on it too. Right?

He… he thinks he’s a moral authority.

scoff skarsgard

Female Reporter: So, do you have any regrets about publishing the article?

Roosh: None. None.

A man with a conscience would have mentioned his mother. I guess he ‘forgot’ to care now the topic of his own pain is off the menu and her shield status has expired.

Female Reporter: Well, you added this was a thought experiment this week. Do you regret not adding that early on?

That’s my question.

Roosh: I regret that people are so stupid that I have to put that in there right now. I never imagined that people would take that in a literal way to lie in order to push their miserable agenda. I never thought that you guys would lie about it. But now, because the masses believe the nonsense that you write, I have to treat everyone like an eight-year-old kid and say this [wait, say it? it wasn’t?] was a thought experiment even though to anyone who is not an idiot should have known that.

You should know the true meaning of what I write without me having to say, even though, as a writer, my entire purpose is clarity. He wants us to read his mind.

Expresses my feelings on this issue

Reporter: So why did you write it originally?

Roosh: Because I am a writer #slowclap# and I write things to make a point. That article was making a point about personal responsibility. That a woman’s safety is not only in the hands of men but it’s in their own hands too. That’s why. I guess that point didn’t get through, so on that account I did fail. I failed to give the point but that doesn’t mean that I did anything wrong. I did not.

#speechless#

Reporter: So a woman that got raped did something wrong.

Roosh: You know, if a woman got raped that is a sad thing. That is a bad thing.

Have you ever seen serial killers confess?
They feel the need to point out murder is bad, repeatedly, because they expect nobody else will know or remember if they don’t. That’s how out of touch this is.

But whose fault is it? #facepalming# Is it the woman fault? No, I’m not saying that. [literally just did, previous sentence] But a woman can do things to reduce the likelihood that she will get hurt. If I get a BMW car right now and I leave the key inside and I park it in a bad area and it gets robbed. Whose fault is that? Is it the thief’s fault? Or is it my fault for being a moron?

He keeps digging.
You think he’s done, but NO-

he keeps-

DIGGING.

There shouldn’t be thieves. Or rapists. That’s the moral point. You are a moron.

Reporter: It’s the thief’s fault.

Roosh: Okay, but would you advise me to leave the key in there? Of course not! Only an idiot would. So okay, so I’ll go ahead and be an idiot but don’t be mad when her car gets stolen. Just do the right things to keep yourself safe. We can’t even tell people what to do anymore to keep themselves safe? That’s weird.

By that logic, you could tell a person to do absolutely anything as long as you say it will keep them safe. Who are you to control other people? Who are you?

Reporter: When you say thought experiment, what was the thought experiment? What specifically?

Also my Q.

Roosh: The thought experiment is that if the government wasn’t completely holding the hand of adult women every step of the way and telling them that nothing you can do is wrong, maybe they would do a little bit of a better job not incapacitating themselves with alcohol and drugs and meeting random guys on the Internet that they don’t know and going to his house to watch Netflix.

You …teach men to do that. Just that. That’s literally your life’s work.
Doesn’t that make you the more responsible party?

sex with actual women mgtow infight

I think I could get laid by more women than Roosh. They certainly hit on me often enough.

Okay, and let’s hold men completely responsible for trying it on with a woman who isn’t 100% willing? Yes? No? Oh, you don’t think they’re a rapist? The Government shouldn’t completely hold the hand of adult men every step of the way and tell them nothing they do is wrong! Meeting random girls is risky! Drinking alcohol on a night out too! If you take that risk, you deserve a true/false rape accusation! For being a moron!

See how this works?

Reporter: But is this experiment just one blog post? Is it a website? Is it books?

Reporter 2: Can you just break down the lie? What I mean by that is can you break down the the crux of your article? Because some people here are unfamiliar, at least I am. I’m not from the Daily Mail.

Roosh: Can you read? I mean can you guys go. No, look guys, you want me to break it down. Read it!

The Do you even lift? of replies.

Down down down he goes…

Reporter: I mean how it got twisted by the media.

Roosh: The media said that the article said that this man wants to legalize rape. That was a lie.

WHY YOU MORON. HOW. SPECIFICALLY. REASONS. LOGIC.

Reporter: Okay, what part of your satirical argument that you’re making can you maybe understand that they took and turned it into that lie?

Roosh: Not honest. They were not honest and they knew it. The people who wrote that and said that the article is true, that that is a “pro-rape” article, they lied. That’s it. They are lying people. Most people in the media are liars.

He just keeps saying they’re liars without explaining as if that’s gonna wash.
Also, saying that to the media? Not smart. Doesn’t he call himself an entrepreneur?

Reporter: So you made a suggestion in this article which was what? Because I haven’t read it.

Roosh: Are you listening to what I’m saying, my friend? I’m telling you that I tried to make a point about personal responsibility. That’s what I did. Okay? You missed that point. Everyone here did. Some people got it. 

Is English his first language?

Reporter: Is this like a multi-year point though? You been trying to do this for like four, five, six years. What about, like, Return of Kings?

Roosh: Okay, is there an article there that you don’t like? That you got offended by?

Reporter: Well, on the front page as soon as you get there one click away it gives you a list of articles to read on “Rape Culture” Was Manufactured To Wage An Unjust War Against Men.

Roosh: Bingo.

WHYYYY.
I put myself through this so you guys don’t have to.

Reporter: The Equality Movement Is Allowing Women To Tyrannize Men. The Deregulation Of The Sexual Marketplace.

Roosh: Okay, you’re just reading headlines, man. Read the articles.

YOU WROTE THE FUCKING HEADLINES.
The outrage! The posturing! Faux brain cells!

Unless he’s admitting to writing clickbait, which makes him no better than the media he slags off.

Reporter: Is this is part of your thought experiment?

Roosh: No, these articles are making a point. [you said the same thing about the rape one] They provide evidence. [no] They provide arguments. [hella no] You’ve read it and you take from it what you want [you can’t write for toffees?] but don’t then go into your media outlet to lie about it. [you haven’t explained the lie though, still, making us doubt there was one]

Reporter: Is the satire something else?

Roosh: How to Stop Rape was a satirical article.

as opposed to…?

Reporter: Okay.

Roosh: These are not.

None of the others? Is this official? So unless tagged, serious?

Female Reporter: So, you know the outrage isn’t only about that one article. A lot of people think that you’re writing about women in general being submissive and [bad audio]. It’s also offensive.

Roosh: I don’t care. #press conference holds shakily#

Female Reporter: Is that something that you believe?

Roosh: Do I believe that a woman should submit to a man? Yes. Does that mean that my family’s address should be put online because of that? And the media should stake out their home because of what I write? No. Using these lies to incite these idiots on the Internet? No.

Wait, that is rape. That is literally the definition of rape, the physical, sexual submisson part. Yes, you do believe in rape. What does Islam mean again, to submit? Submission is not a choice or regarding of consent or human freedom, it is forced. He is trying to play traditional people with this neomasculinity crap but we know the use of the words we choose and it’s submission of a wife to her husband, as they mutually agreed in their vows, not A woman to A man, a random man she owes nothing.

No woman should submit to him because he is a bachelor, a word as insulting as spinster because they require no social respect. The command about submission only applies to married folk, and only when there is a conflict (rare), it doesn’t mean She Does Everything He Says. It means the woman backs down in the event of a dispute within the house. That’s it, a small trivial point rarely exercised. A woman is not a slave (his inner Muslim is coming out). The majority of the time they are a team, a single unit, the House against the World, such an imbalance of tyrant and slave would drive the marriage to dissolution.

Hark the entitlement goes deeper.

Reporter: What’s your justification for believing that women should be submissive? That seems to be…

Roosh: I’m not here to argue why I believe what I do. #yes# #yes you are# Okay? You have to go online, I’ve been writing for years and years, if you really care about that go do your homework. I’m just here to talk about the events of the past week.

He sounds like an omega in this. They’re spiteful and vengeful. They’ll obsess for years and plot. Reams of paper he spilled ink on these topics, it would make sense.

Reporter: I did read some of the things that you wrote and I’m curious and a lot of people here meeting you for the first time are curious to know where you…

With these rude interruptions (why are PUAs always rude little shits?), he’ll get a little dot by his name on their files.
Code Don’t Go Easy.
Keep digging, fool.

Roosh: I really think that you guys don’t read things. You see, Caitlin will write something

Note how the stupid wrong person in his examples is always female?

and you’re like “Okay, Caitlin’s article it’s getting hits so I’m going to copy and paste hers”. So it’s like a game. You guys are writing the same thing. I’m just try to understand what is happened. As you can see of been under a lot of stress [AMYG-DALA!] from all this mob that is coming after me because of the things that you wrote that don’t conform to the real world. I don’t get it. And it’s clear to me that you guys haven’t done your research. You’re ready to write that this guy is pro-rape without knowing where that false idea comes from.

Remember: rabbits project.
It’s you! It’s your fault! You’re deluded! They can’t possibly have read what I wrote because it’s impossible to disapprove of, even though I said I like offending people [above] and even if they did disapprove, I don’t care, so what? What are they gonna do, hit me?
#wait#
Stop talking about the things I wrote after I said multiple times in this very speech I enjoyed the attention!

Female Reporter: Roosh, I have a question for you from the Bang books. So I obviously have done my research and there are several instances…

Roosh: I know. She has known about me.

Female Reporter: …There are several instances in the Bang books where you recount having sex with women who were too drunk or incapacitated to consent. Now people reading that would certainly come away with the impression that you raped those women.

Man is drunk? Roosh calls it rape and backs the MRAs, bleating about ma ooman rights. The rapist must be locked up! This is evil!
Woman is drunk? Roosh calls it seduction and charges men to read about it. He must be respected in his ‘rights’ and allowed to profit and say anything Little Rooshie feels like! This is good – for men!

But he doesn’t hate women! He just treats us differently! …. Less human. That isn’t misogynistic….

#sound of flickering dictionary pages#

Here’s the definition of misogyny!

Hatred of females.
(under Hatred, this is a Psychology Dictionary)
A deep, enduring intense emotion expressing animosity, anger and hostility toward a person, group or object. Hatred is usually assumed to be characterized by a) the desire to harm or cause pain to the object of the emotion and b) feelings of pleasure from the object’s misfortunes. [rabbits’ MO, clearly we need to scan Roosh’s brain, Roosh, the guy who admits to watching rape porn]
(under Sexism)
A prejudice based on sex. …First, a prejudice is generally treated as an attitude or belief, while the term sexism generally connotes differential action and behaviour towards persons which discriminates them on the basis of their sex. Second, the term is nearly always used with respect to discrimination against females, a unitary focus that derives from the objective data of society but which unfortunately delimits the meaning of the term.

See? Completely different to what Roosh does.
Not.

Most of his articles are literally sexist. That’s why feminists mention ‘double standard’ so often, holding a double standard on the basis of sex (not some other third factor) is literally sexist. He does it all the time. As I pointed out, in that pro-rape article, he wanted not rape legalized, but specifically the rape of women. That is the very definition of sexism. Like if I said ‘men can’t be primary caregivers’ that is purely based on their sex, nothing about possible ability for the act (individual-based potential/likely ability is moot for discussion, it doesn’t matter), and marks them out, discriminates them as subject on the basis of their sex. Their demographic group. Ding ding Prejudice Lane.

Roosh: I don’t know anyone except for maybe you that thinks that [Reggie? Can we get Reggie Yates on line 1 Cheryl?] and people who have lost their minds when it comes to consensual sex. [gaslighting again oh dear]

Also, consensual sex is just sex. No need to point it out.
~coughs and points to the serial killer thing~

People who don’t have any idea what girls are doing outside right now and what they will do in an hour or two once they get drunk and pick the guy that they like and let him do whatever he wants with her. So macho sex writing, to convert that to rape takes such a leap of faith that you have to be a liar to think that’s true.

Questioning someone’s true memory of a thing you literally wrote is also gaslighting.

Could you all imply my facepalming so I needn’t type it?

Female Reporter: You literally say that they were too incapacitated to consent.
#cheering from the peanut gallery#
Roosh: Macho sex writing is not a court. It’s not a piece of evidence that you can… Maybe some things I wanted to come across as an aggressive guy. Maybe I did. But just because there doesn’t means that there is a victim out there and she suffered. Have I raped anyone? No.

wow omg likey

Actually real name/identity blog posts and published works are admissible in a court of law.
European law, at least.
And if you’re selling books as true, when you know you fudged the details, that is Passing Off and other trade infractions, including fraud…

It seems like a matter of time before he’s literally telling it to the judge. Never seen a speech this bad. None of them are even lawyers, can you imagine? They could sell the court tape, I’d buy one.

Reporter: Is that fiction?

Roosh: No. It’s not. My interpretation of it may be, but she’s just taking quotes out of context anyway.

no =/= maybe
either it’s a quote OR it’s out of context

and he’s calling them stupid?

Reporter: You made a point that you have an office that overlooks a golf course. You made that clip about speed before is that true?

Roosh: Golf course?

Reporter: Yeah.

Roosh: I have no idea what you’re talking about. Golf course?

Reporter: Yes, you have an office that overlooks a golf course.

Roosh: I don’t remember ever saying that, man.

I do not recall.

Reporter: You mentioned the immigrant agenda and the feminist agenda before. I’m trying to get a better idea of what your personal politics are.

Roosh: I would say that it’s anti-globalists which the Daily Beast represents a globalist type of platform.

You travel the world, for work, you are a globalist.

Reporter: What do you mean by globalist?

Roosh: Anything that benefits the current top 1000 men in the world in the US and Europe. You have a globalists and you have the nationalists. I would lean more towards a nationalist. Tradition, patriarchy, local solutions instead of globalization.

hahaha fuck you

Degenerate scum thinks it’s people. Pat pat.
You wish you were cool.
You didn’t wanna know before the power balance shifted. Called us all sorts of things for defending our countries, even now when we enforce our borders against the likes of you.
A Patriarchy (married men, fathers) would hang him (bachelor) in the town square for seduction and rape.
Patriarchy is not kind to men. It is cruel to bachelors and spinsters. Patriarchy is kind to traditional people who don’t ‘play’ around (ever) and spread disease (he admitted he’s failed to use condoms).

BTW You don’t deliver ‘local solutions’ by skipping the country.

Reporter: So does that mean you’re voting for?

Roosh: Donald Trump comes the closest to what I think is true.

Please let Trump ban him from the USA as a Muslim. Please. It’d be so funny. Cancel his passport one time, just to see his face.
I happen to know for a fact that Mr Trump is a delightful fellow in private, who loves women. He won’t side with you, Roosh the Douche. He is married with children. Note the rabbity technique of siding with the largest group, largest reputed male authority figure, trying to pass themselves off as One of Us? For personal protection?

#chicken noises#

Female Reporter: You express concern about your family after you were doxxed. Does that make you regret threatening to doxx reporters and protesters? Who…

Roosh: I never threatened that. I said I was going to make a list of the names and the social networking accounts. I never said I was going to share their address. That was another lie. Another lie is that I live with my mom. It’s like you guys can’t stop lying. A man can’t visit his mom? I wished I lived with her! But no, that was a lie. See now, I don’t think it’s a good idea to say it but I live somewhere in Europe.

…………………I’m guessing on a visa?

So I’m just here for a short time and I happen to be here and the Daily Mail… I have to say though they had a lens that was far away I was like what’s that over there and you see on the Internet it was right there so… There’s people outside my dad’s house now probably.

http://europe.newsweek.com/roosh-v-return-kings-meeting-422724
Literal Quote: “We must hold journalists fully accountable for their incitement.”
If the post was innocuous, why did he lock it?

Female Reporter: You own that house then right?

Roosh: No, I don’t own the house.

Female Reporter: It’s registered in your name.

Roosh: Well, I don’t know how. #cringe#

Female Reporter: So it’s not your house?

Roosh: It’s not my house. Okay let me stop that and start again. So I don’t want to stay here all night with you guys. I have other things that I have to do so were going to wrap this up at 8 o’clock. Cool?

All that talk of being liars, he sure wants to put a stop to any easy Y/N questions…

Reporter: What else has happened these last couple of days? Did you get dozens of [bad audio]. Has your phone been ringing off the hook? Or your parents’ phone?

Roosh: You know, I think from a security standpoint it’s not smart to share that kind of stuff.

Like he said about celebrity rape claims, we can’t just believe him because he said it happened. Without proof, he must be lying. We have to assume that first now. There are just too many professional victims going around trying to rentseek, sorry.

Reporter: Where do you office out of? Do you find yourself writing on the road?

Roosh: There’s a golf course that is outside of my office… No.

(Laughter)

Roosh: I’m mobile, so um. Office out of, I never heard that kind of phrase before (laughs) but Starbucks? You know?

Reporter: Can you confirm that you did have to upgrade the DDOS protection on the website after the threats?

Roosh: We already had it because my servers were attacked last year. So we already had the systems in place but they were sending 20 million false requests every hour.

Reporter: Actually 20 million?

Roosh: Yeah, that’s the actual number.

Sounds like an anon op.

This was on Tuesday. Monday and Tuesday. Once the Australian thing hit. Now I must say, when the Australia thing hit that was a lot of fun because those people were obsessed about me and I was telling them that I was to come in by boat. But then the shit kind of got real once it came here, you know? Having fun with them is good but when they announce your address and are advising people to go down that then it’s no longer fun.

What, see you in person? For your shitposting online? Right of reply?
Hey, you wanted meetups.
Someone could even say you needed to take some… ‘personal responsibility’.
The only person responsible for your safety, after all, is yourself. If someone attacks you, it might not be entirely their fault. Something you wrote might have provoked them in the same way a short skirt might provoke a rapist. That was the key takeaway message of the article, wasn’t it? That if you can’t completely ensure your physical safety, and nobody can, crime perpetrated against you is somehow your fault. Even a little?

Reporter: Would you say that media misinterpretation is the best thing that ever happened to you?

Roosh: The best and the worst. I mean what’s going to happen now? I’m going to be known, because of you, as a pro-rape advocate for the rest of my life until I die. Oh, that’s the guy that believes that all women should be raped. But at the same time they’re going to say that’s the guy. They’re going to know me. I could take a dump in a box right now and sell it because of you. So that’s what you have done to me. You have made me such a famous guy. I was a guy with the blog, just a guy with a blog, and you have taken me from here to this based on a lie. Now, I’d rather you had not done that but it happened and that is life right? So you’ve got to deal with what actually happens.

Reporter: Would you consider donating some of that money to a rape crisis center?

Roosh: (laughs) I mean I think that the fact that the entire mainstream is trying to stop rape and assault against women I think they’re doing fine. But if they want to donate money to me to help with the bodyguards that I have to hire right now then they are more than welcome to.

Wait, wait –what?

We’re meant to feel sorry for you because YOU don’t feel physically safe?
Are you fucking kidding?

I just… I can’t even. Wow. Just wow. Such irony. Much sexism. Wow.

Reporter: How many bodyguards do you have around you right now?

Roosh: Unfortunately, I can’t share that right now but you can count which guys back there are kind of large, you know?

How many are ROK readers?
Zero, because they’re all pussies.

Reporter: So what are the plans for the next couple of days?

Roosh: The next couple of days is really, probably, to get out of town since it is a little bit hot right now.

Run rabbit run rabbit
run run run…

It’s not that I really think someone is going to come and stab me but it’s not smart to stay in the city where everyone knows where I am at. So I will probably go up or down the East Coast.

Reporter: How often do you return for your mom’s meatloaf?

Roosh: I come for the meatloaf once a year for like one month. And hey, you know, I like to stay with her. I wish I could stay more. I was trying to stay for a month but now, because of this, I had to say goodbye to her.

Mommy Issues.
Hey, he calls the opposite on random women all the time, I think that’s fair.

Reporter: Have you had any trouble traveling internationally yet and you expect it?

Roosh: No. I think England did not go ahead and say that I’m banned. I don’t think Australia will let me in now.

That’s cos you cancelled beforehand. It was unnecessary.

Reporter: Do you plan on trying to go to Australia?

Roosh: I don’t see why I would go there. Yep.

Female Reporter: What does your mom think about all this?

Roosh: My mom is angry. My mom is very angry.

Female Reporter: At you?

Roosh: Not at me. At you guys. She wants me to hit you guys back. Like you don’t understand a Middle Eastern mom, they get angry. I’m having to calm her down because she wants to fight. I’m saying Mom you gotta simmer down now. But no, she said son I support you, do what you gotta do, this is a matter of your speech and as long as you’re not doing anything illegal.

His mother is more of a man than he’ll ever be.
Not a good man, supporting that, but still.
When it comes out he’s done something illegal (over so many years there must be something that sticks) I wonder what she’ll do.

Reporter: What does she think of your treatment of women?

Roosh: Treatment of women? My mom doesn’t know. My mom doesn’t know how I make love to this girl or that girl. [but you film it] She knows who I am. She knows that whatever I write on the Internet and the monster that you have made me there that I have never hurt a woman. [no she explicitly said she supports you AS LONG AS you aren’t a criminal, there’s a catch] You would think by now, guys, that one girl would come forward and say “Yeah, Roosh did it, he raped me”.

Is he seriously tempting fate that hard?

One, you would think. Not one has come forward. Not one. Even though I have been known everywhere. So how do you explain that? Not one.

He seems to be implying that rape doesn’t count unless it’s recorded.
As if plenty don’t go to the police for whatever reason. They can still come out later.
#coughs Bill Clinton, Bill Bill Clinton Bill#
Just because you’ve been alright so far doesn’t mean you’ve got away with it.

It is weird how a lie can get to this point in time. So I’m not sure what the function of the media is because if you’re just going to lie and when the public is really in threat like in Germany was. Women in Germany right now are in threat. You don’t protect them but you come against me, what are you doing?

Reporter: The media cover that pretty extensively. I can email you a bunch of… (offers proof)

Roosh: After the outrage came. From day one? No.

Reporter: That is absolutely not true.

Reporter is correct. Roosh is lying. The media is covering it plenty, actually.
Previously, they were blocked by politicians in the EU, because it was an ongoing case and they didn’t want the illegals to disappear and skip to another country, that wasn’t the media per se. Blame Schengen.

Reporter: Back to what Caitlin was saying earlier, do you at least agree that, legally speaking, the technical legal definition that a woman is too drunk to consent to sex and you have sex with her, that is legally defined as rape. Can you at least…

Roosh: How about the man? If the man is drunk, can he consent to rape? [impossible]

Reporter: We can talk about that in a moment.

Roosh: No, no. It’s the same thing.

If it’s the same thing, and drunk men are categorically raped, then yes, you did rape them, the drunk women.

Reporter: No, no, no, you’re not answering the question.

Roosh: You’re not going to tell me what is right and wrong.

Spoken like a true psychopath. Indignation over questioning their morality, because they have none, so they won’t be able to explain it (like how he couldn’t explain the supposed lie).
They don’t actually know, that’s the joke. They change it, verbally, as they need to manipulate people.

Reporter: Okay, woman, man, whatever, that is a legal definition of rape. Do you disagree with the legal definition of rape?

Roosh: If a man is drunk and a woman has sex with him is it rape?

Reporter: Yes.

Female Reporter: It is not the legal definition of rape in many places though.

Reporter: In many places no…

Roosh: You’re trying to redefine the definition of consensual sex so that every man is on the hook for rape. That is what you’re trying to do. So no, I don’t agree with you.

No, the example was a female rapist.
He’s trying so hard to be a psychopath with this I’m gonna say borderline again, they idolize psychos.
Apparently drunk men are fair game to him from now on. So hey, let’s wait until he’s drunk and pay a really fat feminist to sleep with him. Come on, it’ll be funny. We can film it (since he also advocates that every time a man has sex) and split the royalties.

Reporter: Do you believe Bill Cosby is a rapist?

Roosh: I haven’t seen all of the evidence but I think that it’s weird that 20 years after… [that’s a No despite drugging them, hmmm…, will anyone ask if he’s handled drugs?]

Reporter: If any of these women came back and said “Oh, Roosh did whatever”, here is somebody with a long history of…

Roosh: The evidence that I have seen is girls wanted to be with him and take drugs with him, and then 20 years after that say that he hurt them.

No, they didn’t want to, that’s why he slipped it in their drink.
Deception.
And why would they want to take drugs that make them unconscious? Out cold? With no memory? Drugs a rapist would use, that give no thrill to the victim? And why would he wait for sex until they were out cold?

The Muslim genes express themselves eventually, don’t they?
He literally doesn’t see the problem. He is blind to it. He cannot see, like Bill’s victims after the coffee.

Reporter: So you don’t agree that that is a legal definition of rape?

Roosh: I don’t think that they are being honest.

That was a yes or no question. He’s being evasive at his own gig.

Reporter: If they were?

Roosh: If they were, look man I’m not a lawyer. See this is where we are right now where the mainstream is so obsessed about rape. [no you chose the topic to write that article] We don’t even know what consensual sex [just sex, it isn’t sex without consent, it’s rape] is anymore. This is what we have done. [sharing the blame? no that fails] So no you’re coming after me for an article where, clearly, I didn’t intend for people to think that I want all rape to be legal. [no not all rape, just rape of all women] So we’ve lost our minds. [gaslighting] From now on about sex, the United States is just gone. [then revoke your citizenship] We don’t know what sex is anymore. We don’t know what consensual sex is anymore and that’s because of the work that you have done.

Normal people with a healthy conscience know what consent is.
They have never required the media to inform them.

Reporter: How did this become your issue? We all have different issues we care about passionately, how did this become yours?

Roosh: It’s not my issue. I’ve written over 3000 articles and maybe 10 of them were about rape.

Yes, like “How Women Train Men to Rape“.
And, remember that serial killer confession point again?
How could I forget “Six Reasons You Should Not Rape A Girl.
Hint: None of them are ‘because it’s evil‘.

His #1 reason? It hurts your penis. …How would he know?
He goes on to list “Hypothetical reversals” for when it’s acceptable. No really.
#2 Self-exposure to STDs. #wait for it#
#3 Prison (being caught)
#4 Child support (I am not making this up)
#5 Hookers are easier.
“Hypothetical reversal: You want to experience the rush that comes from committing a felony.” He sounds experienced.
#6 Finding a slut and tricking her into bed is easier (and presumably not rape in his twisted mind).
Considering all the blather about drunk women, consider this finishing paragraph.
“If you’re reading this right now, it’s safe to assume you already have the morals that prevent you from becoming physically violent against a woman, but for the man who has been raised by lions, I hope this list helps him understand the self-harm of committing such a horrible act. As long as you don’t confuse violent rape with the legal act of sleeping with a promiscuous girl that’s as intoxicated as you, you should be okay.”

Crazy people think if something isn’t explicitly on the lawbooks, it’s okay. That it’s moral, in fact. That is their damage.

And as for Roosh’s personal blog, we all know he typed this gem with his own two hands.

rooshvrapistdrunk

Roosh: “During sex, all the power belongs to the male… She doesn’t care about equality, or protecting women from men like me; she just deeply resents the fact that sex is where men completely dominate.”
Other people have been quoting him too.
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/
In the UK at least, this is illegal.
https://daryushvalizadeh.wordpress.com/2015/07/21/roosh-explains-how-he-gets-always-unprotected-raw-sex-no-matter-if-she-insisted-for-condom/
This is rape. Consent is conditional, as I have explained before and cited the relevant statute. If a woman says ‘with a condom’, it isn’t a negotiation. There is no compromise. It’s either sex or rape.
“Roosh explains that he lies about his STDs, and that all the men should lie about their STDs or if they were ever tested, this way assuring that raw unprotected sex will happen.”
Also rape, and criminal charges like ABH may be placed (Actual Bodily Harm) for knowingly passing on a venereal disease.
Roosh: “I’ve had several girls insert my beautiful naked cock inside them while chanting “Get a condom !”
“Girls are supposedly the more intuitive of our species, but if so many feel right about fucking me without a condom, then I must conclude that they don’t know shit. They’re all dirty little whores who truly disgust me with their sex habits. I don’t care if she’s a lawyer, government worker, or environmentalist—if she lives in a metropolitan city and fucked you by the third date, she’s a bucket of disease”

Hey, he wanted us to go read his stuff, I’m obliging.

Do you think he’ll ever look in the mirror one day and hate himself? I don’t.

Reporter: [bad audio] (starting to doubt this transcript is honest)

Roosh: Because when I was in college I want to learn how to make love to every attractive girl that I saw. [whatever their wishes] So I needed to learn which skills that I had to do. Is there anyone that I have not called on yet because I’m trying to think of who is kind of quite. Why are you guys here then?

Reporter: Martha Stewart over there.

(Laughter)

Female Reporter: Um, are you happy?

(Laughter)

Roosh: That’s why we didn’t call on her. I mean happiness is what? Am I happy that people have the wrong impression of who I am? No! But am I happy that I’m probably going to cash in on this as long as I can survive the next couple days? Hey, you gave it to me, you gave me a package and now I will run with it. You can’t turn the clock back. [famous last words]

Reporter: How much have you made off of this in total?

Roosh: You know I have to get my accountant to really tally it. Has sales of books gone up? Yes. Has advertising sales gone up? Yes.

Reporter: What is your vision for the future for male-female relations?

Roosh: (laughs) Okay, well, what I’ve been trying to show on my website is that equality doesn’t work. I mean it doesn’t. If we have a divorce rate that is 50% or more, it doesn’t work. [most of those are 2nd, 3rd… divorces, many by men] I think we have to go back to the days where the man leads the household. [you don’t have a household, your opinion is invalid] I think that’s the only way. But are we in the US? I don’t think so. I think there’s a couple of countries left where we can, maybe in Eastern Europe. The Muslim countries… You guys love Islam so I’m thinking that you guys would love… You guys give it a pass. They have a patriarchal system in the household. Do you get on them for that? In an Islamic marriage, there are some Muslim guys here, rape cannot happen during a marriage. Do you write about that? No.

Reporter: Yes.

Roosh: No you don’t.

Reporter: Yeah we do. I’ll send you a bunch of links on that.

He keeps lying, it’s so sad.

Roosh: Please do, please do. And I’m going to read them carefully. But you guys give it a pass, you guys give Islam a pass for a patriarchal model that I write about but you come after me. Can we get something over here?

Female Reporter: She’s just my photographer.

Roosh: (Sighs)

Female Reporter: I am mostly here just to listen. Everyone else has mostly covered all the questions that I would’ve asked so.

Roosh: Ask anything.

Female Reporter: Why did you pick this hotel?

Roosh: I used to actually come here on dates. I used to bring dates here. This was back in 2000s. This was a place where I used to bring a date. We would sit on a couch upstairs and I would make my smooth moves on them here. This was 2005, 2006.

Reporter: Just to clarify something earlier, you were saying that Donald Trump was the closest. Besides the anti-PC stuff, what do you like about his 2016 campaign?

Roosh: He hates you guys too.

Reporter: Besides that.

Roosh: That’s enough for me. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Reporter: The media is not a political ideological position.

Roosh: Becoming anti-establishment is. You don’t understand, half you will be out of a job within five years time. [also, wow]

Post-collapse, bloggers will starve. You have no other skills. You’re a parasite
(I don’t monetize because of this, giving me time to do useful things, this is a hobby).

Reporter: So you like that he is nationalist and anti-establishment.

Roosh: And the reason is you’re not serving the needs of the public. You’re not. The establishment sites are losing views and I’m sure a lot of you have not seen your salaries increase in the way that you wanted. It’s because we don’t believe in the mainstream anymore. In this case, what you did to me is now showing the world what you guys do and how you operate.

They’ve been asking reasonable questions, douche.

Reporter: I didn’t do anything to you…

Female Reporter: Why did you end up canceling all the meetings? Because a lot of them weren’t going to be protested right?

Roosh: A lot of them were. I would say at least half of them. This news made it to Russia.

Female Reporter: [bad audio]

Roosh: Who said they’re not? You know, a mistake that I made was saying lets let these masculine, strong men organize, who hate the government, probably, and meet. That was kinda dumb. Because this could be a threat against us. So if we have to go underground, I’ll go underground. We never had a goal where we had to do everything in public.

Sounds like a terror cell.
Is he going to join Islamic State next? Full terrorist final form? He already praised their system where they kill, rape and starve little girls. They’d be dead by now without Western aid.

Reporter: If you and the people who follow your website closely are so strong, why do it in secret?

Roosh: Are you going to go to a meeting where the cops are on you?

As if the secret police are going to announce they’re secret police, goddamn.

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

If MI5 doesn’t already have a UK agent on this under deep cover I’ll eat my hat. This cheeky Robin Hood number.
Isn’t he proud of his ideas? #chicken noise# Dare you to get a soapbox in London, it has plenty of Muslims.

Reporter: I have before. [this is a specimen Roosh is unacquainted with, a man with balls]

Roosh: I don’t like this guy. I mean he’s just being argumentative. #CHICKEN NOISE INTENSIFIES#

Female Reporter: Was there supposed to be a public component at all to these meetings?

Roosh: No, it was just the most efficient way to organize people who like me and who like my site. Hey guys, just meet here at this time.

Female Reporter: They were not planning on doing anything there. They were just going to hang out, right?

Roosh: No, okay, I’m going to tell you. There were going to meet at that point and say where’s the Pet Shop? It’s right here. Okay, hey cool, what your name? Where are you from? There’s a bar over here let’s go for a drink. That was it! That was it and then the worldwide anger came.

and discuss what? a bar is public so… if we recorded you, that would be alright?

Reporter: But again if they’re strong, masculine, brave, why the subterfuge? #slowclap#

Roosh: Because you have angered a mob that wants to disrupt their meeting because you have gotten governments against them by lying about their intention.

Why not prove them wrong by showing up and being peaceable? Unless you didn’t want to be peaceable. Rabbits are such cowards. Yes, run along. Run along. You were called out and exposed, you got burned.

Now the world thinks that they’re going to meet to rape people. So why are they going to meet now? Do you think it’s smart to go and meet now? After that? You would go to a meeting where everyone is targeting you as a potential person who is going to rape. That’s what you would do? Of course not! You don’t seem like the type that would stand up to someone who is coming against you. I mean, do you lift? You don’t lift.

What, I was kidding above, I didn’t think-

Reporter: No, I don’t.

Roosh: I do lift but I lost some weight.

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking up

They're so stupid it's a laughriot

laughing rdj crack up

I’m just saying, like, this guy is saying go into the fire. Who is going to do that?

A MAN.

A male with conviction and honour.

That’s absurd! This is where all these absurd ideas come from, from you guys. It doesn’t make any sense! It doesn’t make any sense. (sighs) So we got five more minutes.

Reporter: Do you feel that leaving town or having bodyguards takes away from your masculinity?

#wheezes#

#dying of laughter#

Roosh: No! If your life is in danger, no. [it isn’t, are SJWs a true physical threat or not?] If you want to stand up and fight and get into a confrontation, that’s fine, but right now the heat is on my mom and dad so me leaving is going to take the heat away. [no nobody threatened them] So I am considering them in the actions that I do. Last summer I had two speeches in Montréal and Toronto and the same anger came. What did I do? I stood there.

[You ran like a little bitch, turned and flipped them off from behind bodyguards and a closed door, it’s on camera. I saw the footage.]

Why? Because my family was not in danger. They didn’t post their address. For the record, I held the speeches even though the mayors came out against me but now it’s not worth a public happy hour to go against the police, governors, mayors, and all that stuff and put the safety and privacy of the men who follow me… I can’t toss them into that. [hey at least they won’t be raped] I can toss myself into that. [yeah] I can hire a bodyguard. [no, then you’re risking the bodyguard] I can go out right now and drink (which I will) but I’m not going to put them in danger. [If it came down a choice of Them or You, you would though, wouldn’t you? r-type scum, no loyalty] That would be like just looking out for me instead of the men who trust the things that I do.

I think he cancelled because HE didn’t wanna show up.

Female Reporter: How many men would you say those are?

Roosh: It’s hard to say, but based on the site traffic that I get for Return of Kings, I get one million uniques each month. Out of the hard-core people who really follow me it could be as high as 200,000.

Forum stats are much lower and more accurate. Lies.

Female Reporter: And how many of them were you expecting to go to these meetups around the world?

Roosh: There’s no way to know because it was just show up. Okay, so we got time for one more.

There’s no way to know because you **cancelled**.

Reporter: How many women have you been with?

Roosh: (sighs) A lot. I have been with a lot, but that’s not relevant to the current matter at hand. But thank you. Thank you all for coming. I expect more lies in your articles that are going to come up but I just wanted to do this to show what the truth is. Okay? So have a good night.

He counts notches (ew) but refuses to state a number?
Yeah, he’s lying, it’s much lower than people expect.
I heard a really good joke that he’s probably a virgin. I wish it was funny but I refuse to laugh at female pain.

Sorry, up top I assumed this would be brief but the Questions took up a lot of time and I had good material.

PUAs fail common definition of masculinity

K-types (selfless with societal investment) set the standard.

I love to watch the self-proclaimed redpills get their knickers in a twist over findings they don’t like after tittering over feminists doing the same. It’s petty but it’s funny in a meta way.
The majority of men grow out of the stereotypical opinion that teenage boys have about notches and being a ‘player’. They value being respected more highly (at odds with that r-type narcissistic instinct).

http://psychcentral.com/news/2008/08/27/male-definition-of-masculinity-is-a-surprise/2831.html

Contrary to stereotypes about sexual performance and masculinity, men interviewed in a large international study reported that being seen as honorable, self-reliant and respected was more important to their idea of masculinity than being seen as attractive, sexually active or successful with women.

Patriarchs don’t respect the manwhores that might corrupt their daughters or cuck their sons. Most men are patriarchs compared to PUAs. The media portrayal of their lifestyle and social approval on reality TV makes them assume it crosses over to real life, when it doesn’t. Most people don’t approve of sluts, even other sluts. Let alone respect them.

inb4 ‘beta’ – those are the qualities of kings, real kings

The study published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine included interviews with more than 27,000 randomly selected men from eight countries (Germany, U.S., U.K., Spain, Brazil, Mexico, Italy and France), with about 16 percent of the men reporting erectile problems.

Spot the porn addicts.

Regardless of age or nationality, the men more frequently ranked good health, harmonious family life and good relationships with their wife or partner as more important to their quality of life than material, self-fulfilling or purely sexual concerns.

aka Most men are mature. They aren’t selfish. That’s wise. Happiness studies support that opinion.

Who knew the real men aren’t online bitching? Who knew?

There’s more to life, kids.

The Don Juan Complex

Complex of Don Juan
Complex derives from constant personal frustrations incurred in intimate relations with women. Sad love story with a broken-heart-end or sexual traumatic experience might also be in the roots of this masculine complex.
Complex`s manifestations vary from case to case, whereas, common aspects are the following:
– Psychological perception of a woman as a source of pleasure, which can and should bring satisfaction to a man;
– Ignorance about women;
– Easy-going and superficial attitude towards all women without exception;
– Tendency to change the intimate partners frequently, without concentration on someone in particular;
– Dramatization of the relations with women, e.i. leaving without saying ‘good-bye’ etc.;
– Habit to live at woman`s cost;
– Incapacity to truly love a woman and to build the long-term and stable relations with her.
Unfortunately, such people are not capable to create a family, and in a case when the person aims at changing his life, the psychoanalysis and personal-relations therapy shall be applied.

source: https://analyticalpsychology.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/types-of-psychological-complexes/

The men who like drama so much they go around sowing it.

Bet that burns, being shown up as a greedy little bitch by a white middle class man

Which group does this remind me of? Answers on a postcard.

Roosh V fraud? and OT: Game footage illegality

h/t Bob: http://uncabob.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/i-called-it-years-ago.html

https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2015/08/30/roosh-never-got-laid-in-ukraine/

I’m not saying it’s true, I’m saying it would make logical sense. He hated London, remember?

Includes this video;

Misconception: You don’t have to explicitly say you’ve had any form of romantic relationship up to sex with a woman for it to be within illegal territory. With all the EU law on top of national law, which Americans don’t understand at all, the mere inference e.g. picture use, mention by name, would be enough in the context of such websites. American “jokes” only fly in America, about Americans. In Europe, they might get you arrested.

I do find it slightly disturbing that he is obsessed with women of my race and totally ignores non-white women (pedestal anyone?).
From a woman’s perspective, women of that level never fall for a pick-up unless they want to aka whores. I can tell they are not whores (women can tell). This top-tier band of women are so used to being hit on, it bounces off. I’ve seen this in person and asked about it, they find the whole concept tiresome and slightly sickening to the stomach. Not to mention dehumanizing. However, lying about a woman’s reputation like this is in fact slander and libel, so I wonder why he would be so stupid as to try that on. Is he one of the people who naively believe the internet doesn’t count? How long before women like this band together with SJW money to sue him? A matter of time if the allegations are in any way true. Reputation is dead serious legal business, a woman’s sexual history is no joking matter and no one could say he didn’t deserve it.
I have encountered many Arab men who’ve done this, the classic trick being photoshop girlfriends. I just wish he’d stick to lying about his own race, since he is a realist. The demographics of the PUA skew heavily toward Arabic men. However, they seem to have an almost predatory focus on European, white women. This is the secret reason SJWs are bothered by them so much, cultures value white women and feminism especially.

Slightly OT.

I have seen Game recordings filmed in London and been horrified. That is illegal and could be used in court as evidence of harassment, so they shouldn’t be doing it in self-interest either. Either they don’t know it’s illegal, or they don’t care and I don’t know which is worse.
https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress.com/2015/07/21/pua-talks-to-women-and-gets-into-trouble-with-police-proving-game-does-not-exist/

http://filmlondon.org.uk/get-permission-film

Section 137 of the Highways Act 1980 restricts these rights where the use of the highway causes an “obstruction” to other users rights of free passage. If you are considered to be causing an obstruction then there is a risk that you will be stopped from filming.

Literally stopping women (something even the police don’t do) would count.

http://www.jisclegal.ac.uk/ManageContent/ViewDetail/ID/3217/Is-it-okay-to-film-people-in-public-places-21-August-2013.aspx

In accordance with Data Protection legislation (Data Protection Act 1998) consent should be obtained from any individual who is the focus of a video recording in order to process his/her personal data fairly.  Where a recording involves individuals other than the main players, then, in some circumstances, the images of other individuals may constitute personal data and the data protection regime may come into play

http://filmlondon.org.uk/legal

Where consent has not been obtained, the filmmakers must decide if they can still include the image or whether they will need to take steps to obscure the individual’s face…

…Filmmakers should carefully consider whether there are any defamatory meanings implicit in their footage. If there are then identifiable personal images should not be used without consent….

Filming women for what would legally be considered sexist purposes or to imply she is easy (as the focus of a Game attempt) would be included in this.

Where possible, obtain written consent from anyone shown on camera. If an individual is the focus of a particular shot or video then consent is essential. If you have captured an individual in the background of a shot and they are clearly identifiable, you will also need their consent. Remember that even if someone’s face is obscured, they could still be identifiable in other ways (i.e. through their car number plate).

Voice.

You should not use images of an individual in a manner that could be defamatory and lower their reputation. Avoid all manipulation of an image that suggests a context or meaning that was not part of the original image and do not associate an individual with a negative or damaging story unless such association is accurate and truthful. Remember that what you might think of as harmless could be very damaging to a different person’s reputation (i.e. the head of a bank wrongly associated with a story about credit card companies charging excessive fees).

…Laws in Europe prohibiting the photography of citizens for public display have delayed the release of Google Street View in some countries.[9]

Literally, Game videos (filmed in the UK at least) shouldn’t exist. Even private use (fap videos) would be dodgy, let alone the retarded quality to “Let’s publish this on Youtube because that must be fine”! The very reasons for filming are the ones the laws expressly forbid (i.e. seeing the woman, hearing the woman).

Persistent or aggressive photography of a single individual may come under the legal definition of harassment.[4]

There are also copyright issues, especially if the person you film is much higher in status (which you may be unaware of), because they are contributing to the value of the copyright which you distribute and without a model release or some such, it’s also grounds for a civil suit.

Extreme example;

A right to privacy exists in the UK law, as a consequence of the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law through the Human Rights Act 1998. This can result in restrictions on the publication of photography.[28][29][30][31][32]

Then there’s the idea of a private conversation in public (including content i.e. one’s personal life). Essentially, these “players” are being total fucking idiots. The burden of proof is civil, 51%.

There are also use of likeness laws and tying them to a product (a man’s Game or Game website/books count) as commercial purposes behind the video, which also go ahead without consent. Even researchers fall afoul of this law but the Universities somewhat protect them. Somewhat.

Personally, I would sue. And I’m generally tolerant of men making fools of themselves in public.