A shrink on sexual harassment “can’t you take a compliment?”

It’s odd how men will admit women are sensitive about their appearance then continue to attack us on it.

Yeah, that’s bullying. Even in school, that is not flirting.

A delightful, common sense explanation.

In before autism;

If you DON’T ‘believe’ in sexual harassment – go to a gay bar on a Saturday.

See how long you last.

That is a woman’s life.

Men are lecherous pigs, regardless of sexuality. What does a lecherous woman look like? A man.

Since any reading this and disbelieving are cowards, simply ask every woman you know and care about (assuming any stuck around you) about their experiences. There are always experiences, regardless of ‘age’ and seeming ‘fuckability’. Don’t talk over them excusing it, just ask the question, shut up and listen.

Actually, 9/10 male rudeness is the inability to shut up and listen. There are studies.

OT Rape accusations imply guilt. A totally honest man needn’t fear them.

https://www.jeunesepayne.co.uk/single-post/2016/11/07/Sexual-Harassment-%E2%80%9CCan%E2%80%99t-you-take-a-compliment%E2%80%9D

“When someone shouts across the street at me “show us your cunt”, or even just wolf-whistles, it’s not because they think it’s going to make me feel good.

It’s a reminder that they could overpower and attack you. R-types don’t care for rule of law, Ks are respectful (either ignoring you in public or getting introductions the decent way).
I saw a very right-wing blog post an article about how the author could easily rape any woman he likes.
In quite graphic detail and practically frothing at the prospect. I don’t read that blog anymore.
This was supposed to scare us all straight (and into agreement with him).

Rape isn’t funny to women, it appalls us (ESPECIALLY the conservative ones), it’s worse than murder. Imagine getting castrated, male power stripped and stolen. Rape is worse for women, at the very least for the conception aspect. A man joking about rape is an r-type trying to pass for K (strong). Those are the worst.

When women see a man seriously laugh (not from shock, but enjoyment) at domestic abuse or whatever sexual ‘prank’ is going on, it would be like watching a woman laughing at a man gored on barbed wire in WW1. Our thought is always the same: what if that were me?

This is why women choose compassion in mate selection studies.

Which sex has the blacker humour?

“Can’t you take a joke?”

Is civilization a joke? They make me wonder.

This is why the right wing’s reputation suffers. Manwhores cosplaying Patriarchy. They seem to think it means concubines and slavery, rather than monogamy and industry.

As for the genuine conservatives…

If they can’t fuck it or kill it, they’re probably going to insult it.

It’s not a well-intended or genuine interaction. They’re not even under some misguided impression that such comments will make me want to have sex with them.

Some are truly that stupid.

Thought process as follows:

If I make her hate me, it’ll remind her of my mother/her father.

Presuming all fathers are incompetent (r-selected) as his. Another layer of insult.

Resent women? No! I simply happen to crush and abandon them all by sheer coincidence!
Distrust women? Sure! They made me leave them! Projection’s only real when women do it!

It’s simply an exertion of power. The aim is to get approval or laughter from others, and discomfort or gratitude from me.

That is better known as sadism.

It is caused by degenerate media, especially the supernormal stimuli of HD streaming online porn.
I guarantee you 100% of those males are porn addicts, the female leches too. The testosterone has to go somewhere, they lack the impulse control (hypofrontality) and time preference to do something good with it.

A compliment is something you would feel comfortable giving a man, woman, or child because you believe it would make them feel good. You’re not boosting anyone’s self-esteem by reminding them that, by society’s standards, “you look acceptable enough for me to fuck”.”

There is always the insult that your primary value is whether they’d use you as their whore.

They’re calling you a whore.

That’s what no woman will admit.

You’re soliciting women on the street. As a whore. But at least whores can charge.

They refuse to accept they’re being rude but they wouldn’t say it if children were present. They desperately want attention but project this onto the provocateur (and looking good isn’t an excuse for anything, is it?) although differing tastes apply, so you can’t even hide your attractiveness since they’ll always be someone Into That. [cough pervert cough]
In conclusion, blame porn. Speaking to people like that (a whore) might not even be acceptable in a purely sexual, private interaction. If they’re smart, they’d leave immediately. It’s demeaning, dehumanizing and morally bankrupt, like the source.

Provocateur is a word I use deliberately… it’s never applied to men, is it?
There’s no such thing as Adam Teasing and Taharrush ‘games’ go after… which sex?

Misandrist women avoid men but misogynistic men seek out women.

Hello, the bulk of MGTOW.

They seek women out to punish them [1]  for what is perceived (projection) as the other’s wrongdoing. It’s never them, never examine the self!!!

Sexual predators, sexual sadism.

I guess womb envy comes into it somewhere but mention that after they play the feminist ‘Penis Envy’ record for the millionth time and suddenly the concept might be shaky? [SJWs lie, r-types lie, logic is a lie to them, thinking is K]

1 Who are you? You can’t lose the chub and get a good job, get out of anyone’s face. At least join a church or Greeenpeace or something. A useful Crusade.

I know, I know.

“Yes, but –

What about men?”

…What about the men?

Where are the men when this happens? [2]

Women exist, women are the fair sex. Women will be sexually harassed as long as we live. Men need to police other men, we certainly can’t.

Think too of the racial and class angles.

Is this acceptable as a way to treat people in the first world?

2

Sign of an r-type male: when you defend a woman from attack (and attack it is), you get accused of White Knighting. Yes, but White Knights are a good thing (Ks) and protect other Ks from monsters…

They never speak to men that way, knowing the odds of an altercation. Cowards to boot. Sexual competition makes the rabbit flee. At times, they’ll use the term incorrectly (in defense of another r) as a compliment of her sexual quality (lie) to get her into bed. It uses triangulation, the common manipulation tactic. Are those men crazy? Probably male borderline, it’s under-diagnosed. It would explain their romantic or intimacy issues that can be masked socially to some extent. R-types fear intimacy because it leads to responsibility and commitment, turn-offs. R/K does neatly align with attachment conditions (anxious-avoidant, secure)…. with the Mother (Freud wins).

Another sign “why are women so easily offended?” [3]

Only the ones around you.

Hm.

Yes, it’s definitely us…

all three billion of us, currently. And they say women can’t do maths?

3

Prelude to gaslighting, All women are crazy bullshit. Pathologizing a problem makes it go away!

See also the classic “why won’t women-” do whatever Lord Fauntleroy wants?

Narcissistic entitlement brewing up to rage. Histrionic, effete rage.

“Women used to be ladies”

The latest meme making an irritating entrance into popular thought.

TLDR; read bolded.

It’s intended to insult clubbing culture (fine, ban clubs, otherwise, STFU about them).

Like most memes appealing to history, it’s misled at best, misleading at worst.

Rewind to the earliest times with video.
Ladies have fun too. Anything less is an overhanging lie from the Sexual Revolution.

“Yes but women used to be demure and coy, they didn’t dress and act like sluts.”

It is ironic the modern man has such a lax definition, as if looking at a man ‘the wrong way’ is slutty.

Women have always ‘made eyes’ at men, because we have eyes. When we use them, we’re accused of making eyes because studies show men are acutely sensitive to social overtures from women.


Maybe, just maybe, the nature of people doesn’t change much over time, and not everything is about you and how hard done-by you are? The term for that is a victim complex.
Look up the Evelyn Nesbit scandal, it was their OJ.
They even had versions of the Kardashians, pin-up girls before pin-ups, which really date back to the 18th century and painted adverts. If you believe any advert, it’s a de-facto IQ test and you lost.


Maybe read some social history before acting like you understand all women?

Especially those in other time periods.

^If that were true, you’d be a billionaire selling us bullshit. Advertising people understand people.

Funnily enough, women tend to be up on social history, so I find a meme that relies on our collective ignorance of it rather entertaining. The average woman knows as much social history trivia as a man knows military.

In perfect truth, such males want to castigate degeneracy without drawing attention to their own.

Let alone limiting it. R-types playing K.

This is intellectually dishonest, an argument based on bad rhetoric, bad faith, historical ignorance and makes for a coward. If you’re irritated that, in a world where sex is freer than ever, you still cannot get laid, perhaps the problem is not the people you fail to impress?

Maybe the problem is that you keep bitching like a gay guy.

Don’t look at a pretty woman and think the modern version of ‘ANKLE?!!!!‘ only to wonder why you’re labelled a creep and become a social leper. Offended people on this stuff are dull from birth.

Look and think ‘that’s nice’ and move on with your day because this superficial shit is not, by definition, important.

The women least likely to wear a miniskirt are prostitutes, because the goods are not given away for free.

Everything you know is wrong.

Ask a man with sisters if he judges their sexual desperation on what they wear.

Imagine if we applied the same judgementalism to men – all short-sleeve shirts are hereby signs of a gigolo. Shorts? Whore! Wear trousers like a proper man!

Only in the 20th century did it suddenly become acceptable (imho, no) for an adult man to wear shorts. It was considered ridiculous and you’d be mocked for it like turning up to a funeral in assless chaps, as was going topless until coal-miners striked because of job demands. This is the God’s honest truth. Look it all up. Shorts are literally the most immodest thing a man can wear, the male mini-skirt. It’s worse than a mini-skirt because things can play peek-a-boo. Short sleeves come in a close second and were taken up by the Italians with the sleeveless ‘wife-beater’ where they both should have been left, men couldn’t show their waistcoat at the beginning of the 20th Century.

Casual or modest, pick ONE.

I heard this meme from Clarey on YT years ago – he immediately began to criticize every modest fashion going, with an emphasis of vitriol for the maxi skirt. …That’s just a skirt. It’s a term for a proper skirt.

This stuck in my mind because I assumed it was a joke and waited for the punchline, the hypocrisy was so overt to a non-American. You have no idea what you want, but you know how much you want it!

He hated totally normal skirt lengths, pictured in the Edwardian videos, because it covered women up and he couldn’t ogle them, no more than five seconds after saying, to paraphrase- Why don’t women dress like ladies anymore?

The problem is male demand.

Male demand for risque fashions. Rappers are the main problem.

You can see how years of this from Kindergarten can make for avoidance of anyone who tries to pull it.

You can’t countersignal if nobody values your opinion to begin with. Look through the photos of the men saying these things and you’ll quickly realize they attract casual women because they are casual men. I haven’t seen a single one that owns a single (ONE) good suit. A good suit, by style standards and formality rules. Not a great suit, not an impressive suit, not an elegant suit, not a gentleman’s suit. A single decent item.

Which brings me to my next point: how do you intend to pay for that?

More fabric, more $$$$$. That is not a typo. A suitable wardrobe is 4-figures, a good one is five. This is based on wear and variety for activities. Being formal is more expensive, rappers lie.

Look at the guys making these claims about ladies. Are they gents?

Any woman looking at these guys will immediately notice the discrepancy, it’s like…

Which fork, Forney?

They have no clue of basic etiquette and try to prattle on like a stage mother.
They are alcoholics who couldn’t tell you the difference between a white wine and red wine goblet if their lives depended on it.

Nobody takes this ‘advice’ seriously. They have nothing to offer but opinion and personal complaint.

The funniest thing my society friends ever heard about women’s fashion was one drab man telling, loudly, anyone who would listen, that spaghetti straps were the sign of a slut.

This story still does the rounds and I’ve heard people quoting it without getting the joke.
Guess the nationality. Go on, guess. I think we all know.
Guess what he was wearing with his bad tan and fake Rolex he kept showing to people who could tell the difference.

These are the guys who refuse to buy a drink to assert interest (formal politeness) or buy a dinner they invited their intended to (the formal rule) but they want a woman with expensive taste?

Are you quite sure?

They slob around in t-shirts and shorts, in general, and wonder why the women draped in £3,000 Dolce don’t give them a second look. Class does come into it. The problem is, they have none.

Therefore, they refuse to see it as an issue…. because it IS the issue.

Women do not qualify to men. Eggs are expensive.

However, not looking like ‘Kevin the teenager’ helps.

Would you show up for a job interview wearing this? Are you using it for a sport? If the answer to both is NO, do NOT wear it out of the house and for the love of Christ get a good suit before you start spouting off on Patriarchy and the dire need of male leadership.

You don’t care how you look? Yes, it shows.

Hate sluttiness? Push to ban all contraception and sexual health clinics. Yes, all.

Hate immodest clothing? Push for Elizabethan clothing laws. Yes, in social history, there are many, many actual, literal laws that restricted things like length for modesty, and most women are aware of these. It would also mean strippers are illegal and you can’t pretend to be rich in clubs without actually being rich.

I don’t expect these guys to grow the balls, ..do you?

Conformity is a feminine virtue, as I mentioned earlier, so don’t blame all women for the actions or obscenity of singular examples, otherwise, all men are like Jack the Ripper; non sequiturs about men would be far more insulting.

Why aren’t women virtuous, they ask, not a virgin themselves.

Because none of the previous words will get through to ‘these’ people.

We mock idiots like you.

Self-styled alphas more prone to depression

Typical ‘blokes’ who see themselves as competitive, dominant playboys ‘at greater risk of depression’

“In general, individuals who conformed to strongly masculine norms tended to have poorer mental health and less favourable attitudes toward seeking psychological help, although the results differed depending on specific types of masculine norms.”
“While all typical “lads” were found to be at greater risk for mental health issues, the researchers found particular traits put a bloke at greatest risk.
They were self-reliance, the pursuit of playboy behaviour, and power over women.”

positive, negative, negative
creative, destructive, destructive
Men need women, punishing us for this is bound to eat away at them.

“The masculine norms of playboy and power over women are the norms most closely associated with sexist attitudes.
“The robust association between conformity to these two norms and negative mental health-related outcomes underscores the idea that sexism is not merely a social injustice, but may also have a detrimental effect on the mental health of those who embrace such attitudes.”

Using and then disdaining someone evolutionally in need of your protection and love (femininity) is sure to cause self-loathing. Guilt builds up over time into shame and then self-loathing, which is often projected to the trigger.
Sexism is really a neurosis, a rationalization of one’s personal potency. See Inferiority and Superiority Complexes.
It’s a lot of pressure to outdo billions of people, still living. They are terrified of mano-e-mano competition. Socially, other men terrify them, and women sense this cowardice, as a weakness to pick on something weaker still – usually women, sometimes animals or children (sadist hunters, serial killers and pedophiles). Misogynists get very threatened by historical stories of female success, dismissed as impossible, or the merest prospect of any kind of meritocratic empowerment, feeling unable to complete on a level playing field. The player lifestyle is one of shame and deception. They burnout and end up alone, having lost many friends to the lifestyle too. Don’t pity the predators, they chose their fate. What you sow, you shall reap. Karma is a bitch.

Link: The ‘Alpha’ is Omega

http://uncabob.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/the-manosphere-is-basically-full-of-shit.html
“When the game community talks “Alpha” they are really describing “Omega” and when they say “Beta” they are really describing “Zeta.” …
However, it is entirely false to confuse the Alpha with Omega traits. One must keep in mind that human beings naturally exhibit pair-bonding and Alphas still pair bond while Omegas do not. [DS: CANNOT]. Most high partner count people I know, such as my two friends I mentioned above, are Omegas, not Alphas. They are sexual deviants with numerous sexual partners but their social ranking is low and that is why they need to continually game more than one woman at a time. They can only fool a woman into believing they are Alpha for a short amount of time and they have little ability to actually keep a woman of high mating value. Another reason they continually need to have more than one chick on the go is to protect their own emotional vulnerability. Of course, this behaviour also provides the Omega male with social proofing, which helps them get more chicks, but this is a different kind of social proofing than that which the Alpha male gets.
Each time an Omega “scores” another man gets screwed over. Except for virgins, pretty much all women are romantically involved with someone at the time they decide to discard the old for the new. This is not conducive behavior for gaining social power amongst the other males surrounding the Omega male, and in fact will soon leave him completely powerless and struggling for survival. If an Omega were the town blacksmith and he screwed 100 of the local women, he would soon find a large portion of the town shunning him and taking their business to the next town, if someone didn’t outright kill him first for his cuckolding behavior. There is very, very little survival value for a woman and child to be attached to an Omega male. Without government welfare picking up the slack and creating a “Keynesian Sexual Marketplace,” the natural market would soon see both the Omegas and their lovers removed from the race. [DS: WILL see them removed from the future, whatever they do now]
And herein lies the quandary with “game” as it is put forth in the Manosphere today. We have the Omega class (low value males – lower than Beta) posing as Alphas (high value males), and since Omegas are the scum class rather than socially powerful Alphas who have other males’ cooperation (along with high female attraction), the Omegas are flourishing while Beta males are floundering after being relentlessly propagandized to emulate the weak-willed traits of the Zetas. And, in many ways, Omegas are scum for how they treat other males. There are many who believe that when out pussy-hunting, it is their right to screw other men’s wives and then get a chuckle at their cuckolding of other men. This is deviant behavior, and certainly not “Alpha.””

Deadbeat self-styled ‘players’ and welfare queens are deviants deserving of one another. They often share the same mental illnesses (sex addiction, drug/drink abuse, domestic abuse, and borderline/antisocial/NPD, all three flavours of the same pathology).

I’ve seen some in the manosphere rubbing their hands with glee at the thought of those ‘whores’ getting their comeuppance.

correction ohuhno idiots

Uh… aren’t you a whore, too?

Sleeping around for social attention is worse than doing it for money.
If you also need men/women for your self esteem, and engage in notch-counting, that’s pathetic. Sexual Pokemon, really? Gotta bang em all?

Be careful what you wish for. You want the promiscuous to be outed, shunned socially?

Men won’t be forgiven for their sexual vices either.
In a K-society, reputation is everything.

Men are actually judged harsher for being cads and punished by patriarchal societies more lethally, because the fathers with power wish to protect their innocent women. That’s the way it ought to be too. Women are usually led astray by men, sexually. Men are the sex in active pursuit, the hunt. Men are the source of the sexual problem.

[n.b. These promiscuous people of each sex being about 15% of the population in all studies, nowhere near what they presume while salivating with sadistic delight over the prospect of female pain for the gall to sexually reject them aka omegas].

These discussions never mention the negative consequences for men, and this is unfair to them, they should be informed about what they’re doing, and how the negative repercussions won’t solely strike women when/if collapse comes.

Having it All is impossible, yes. That also applies to men. Namely, you can’t be a slut (r-type) at present and expect to contentedly settle into K-selection monogamy when the SMP collapses. Studies show dissatisfaction. You’ve already damaged your brain’s ability to pair bond. Once it’s gone, it’s gone forever. There are brain scans. You’d have to deny the holy power of MRI to allow the cognitive dissonance to believe in the Sexual Revolution’s Big Lie. No, casual sex isn’t good for you. It isn’t good for anyone.

The manosphere ignores anything that makes them feelbad and triggers them with social consequences/responsibility/duty, in this regard, they’re the male equivalent of the feminists they verbally deride while secretly wishing to hate-fuck them. Childish people, childish priorities.

Muh dick is a Third World motivation.

I don’t know a single player who sustained a marriage, let alone a happy one. I can think of a pairing with one moderately good woman, but that bloke was mostly good anyway already and who knows, they could divorce. Players either die alone or die alone with a string of divorces under their belt, warning off The Youth from marriage because they were too impulsive and selfish to make it work themselves. It’s like the welfarites who tell the aspirant never to get a job, because those suck.

Link: Manwhores as poor husband material

She always goes for the nice perspective, doesn’t she? Never gives them a smack and the blunt truth.

hookingupsmart.com/2012/05/07/relationshipstrategies/can-a-manwhore-ever-really-settle-down-even-if-he-wants-to/

“In this culture, though, plenty of guys have lots of casual sex while young, fully intending to settle down later, marry and have a family. They may find the transition to monogamy especially difficult. The more women a man has had sex with, the lower the odds that he can be sexually gratified by one woman. Ever.

Understatements. That type often turn to porn within a marriage and maintain to the therapist (!!!) that it “doesn’t count” as cheating, Bible be damned. The addiction to novelty from the times of promiscuity have ruined him for the institution of marriage.

If the (wasted SMV) behaviour is bad, it doesn’t matter which sex does it. It’s bad for MMV. Definitively. No exceptions.
These market values are opposites and rely on opposing values and behaviours. If you spend one, you lose the other. It’s a tradeoff. You can never Have it All. It’s impossible. This parody of the Single Life is being sold to men now, as they began with Empowered Woman, they have moved to the more-profitable Eternal Bachelor. ‘Fully intending’ – based on? They were sold a myth, that sex is always good and causes no social damage. An obvious falsehood.

The genetic dead-ends I don’t care for, they got what they deserved. They wanted to be alone, they are.
On the other hand, there are plenty of decent men (who’ve never behaved in such a way) who can’t find wives, and it has to be repeated that these are different scales e.g. probably don’t try to attract your future wife (of high MMV) in a club setting (literally the modern SMP). It’s like going bird hunting underwater.

What to do?

No, he doesn’t need to think about it from his view (selfish). Culture already tells us to do that too much. He’s seeking. He’s in the position of need. The solipsism of that letter, ignoring his terrible treatment of the opposite sex he claims to cherish, betrays why he’ll end up dissatisfied whoever comes along, it’s always about him.

Think about it from his Perfect Woman’s perspective.

Assuming he met her tomorrow, how repulsed would she be? Perfect wife material for him, right there. What would she think. Isn’t that the most important thing, logically? The opinion of the one you want to attract? 

Why would she choose him?
Good women are at a higher premium in this age than good men. I’d bet a million dollars she’d Next him. For one with better pair bonding (biological fidelity) ability.

That physical/emotional disconnect the manwhores exhibit is very disturbing, a trait shared with serial killers, and to act on it betrays a cheapened view of her sex (rightly or wrongly). The cheating risk alone would be bad to a wife material woman, but the knowledge of comparisons, as a woman ages and her body changes with childbearing, is unbearable.

Why risk it?

Outside a film, exceptions aren’t made for the Monomyth Hero.

Men aren’t as special as they think they are. No trophies for trying.
Women are not a reward for XYZ. They have more at stake biologically than men, and we behave accordingly (with the Right to Reject).
Gen X men are seeing that. Gen Y on average sleep around less than their parents, but the promiscuous are very promiscuous and pull up the average. Those people are likely going to marry and suffer for their poor choices (of spouse or previous behaviour, haunting them like the Shags of Seasons Past), marry and divorce or die alone. I can’t summon the sympathy for people who chose this path, their belief in entitlement to another person is repugnant.

Cheap, easy sex is an addiction, sure as porn, drink and drugs. This is why players experience burnout as their dopamine system crashes, or simply don’t attract the same level of attention from their target women as they age into the “I could be her father” range.

Mother Nature has a sense of humour.

‘To settle’ is actually a good thing, a happy event leading to a life of contented domestic bliss. Feminists tainted it.

In strict answer, no.

Manwhores can never settle.

In the same way as slutty women, they will always pine for what they’ve had, if you’ll pardon my French, on the cunt conveyor belt.

p.s. There needed to be an equivalent of the cock carousel. Isn’t a nice thought, is it?

p.p.s. Look at the r-type delusion in the comments. When the data runs against their blind faith, the data must be wrong… even when it’s on women’s preferences, in which men have zero valid opinions. If you wanna find a manwhore, cite the data on their long-term ineligibility and how they can’t be trusted, and see who gets triggered.

r/K and Trivers’ Parental Investment Theory

I assume you know r/K, here is a paper direct from the source on the latter.
You’re smart enough to draw the connection here.

http://www1.appstate.edu/~kms/classes/psy2664/Documents/trivers.pdf

Promiscuity is bad for males.

triverspromiscuity

Science. Evolution.

GTFO, haters. Either swallow the redpill data or quit pretending to care about the truth.

shrug lol toldyaso fuck you batemanhappy bateman

Also, evobio arguments about fertilization don’t apply to sterile sex.
For the same reason a man’s opinion on periods is baseless, they aren’t really having it.

DAT Table 7.1

Link: The Fake Player or ‘Nice Guy’ Fuckboy

http://elitedaily.com/dating/fckboy-nice-guy-player/1318600/

These have always been around.

They’re trying to play both fields, good girls and bad.

The simplest filter is to refuse to sleep with them, hence the infamous Nice Guy meltdown.
If sex is all they want instead of that romantic buildup, they’ll leave.

See how they portray themselves on social media. If they don’t have social media or heavily filter it, run, because nowadays only two types of people don’t have it: serial killers/rapists and people trying to hide who they really are.

Note how quickly they’ve gone through women historically. If they get over women quickly they’re either a plain cheat or a serial monogamist (emotional infidelity, lining up the next before dropping the last, stone cold bastard).

Good girls are likelier to fall for it out of unwillingness to conceive that some men might fake romance to get a higher quality of woman into bed. Aka Casanova strategy.

When the romance reaches a peak, ask clearly “Is there anyone else?” Other than an immediate, clear, slightly-hurt No, there’s someone else. If there’s someone else when you’re in full romance mode, he’s worthless.

See, he doesn’t want you to throw his lie back in his face later on, his social group will shame him more than he feels himself (clue: none). He’s hoping you’ll never ask. However, either party has a right to ask when the connection is building.

Worse than the honest fuckboy who upfront says it’s only about sex.

Thankfully, they rarely pass on their genes, too infatuated with possibility and The Chase to settle on a single woman. What single woman could be Perfect enough to bear his child, after all? He has so many to compare her with!

Leave the boys to it.
Seek the men.