The male c-word: CUCK

I’ve been waiting to do this post for a while. Biding my time. OK, let’s go.Even better, give them a pitying look and smirk no matter what they say.

Heavy on meme. Short on brain.

shitposthistory

arcuck

It isn’t the fetish. It refers to a brand of traitorous self-proclaimed conservatives that don’t even talk the talk. A milquetoast inefficiency born of fear of disapproval. An ideological traitor but fence-sitter and desperate people-pleaser. They will betray their ingroup to please the outgroup that will never accept them, and they know this.

A peculiar kind of betrayal charaterised by ingroup loathing, as opposed to self-loathing. In fact, all they care for is reputation, being densely narcissistic.

Cuckservatism: Seeking approval from other (usually liberal) men like they’re your wife.

Example? Exhibit A:

cuckproof

cuckchicken

Yes, that’s the reason. Some of you may remember my use of this meme.

It has nothing to do with the paraphilia, it’s the sound a chicken makes.

It’s the male c-word because it attacks the inconsolable male weakness: cowardice.
This is intentional. It precisely targets their masculinity, since they push androgyny.
It points out their non-traditional sexual practices, for mockery. As manwhores.
This is intentional.
Obviously I knew this but I question how many others do?
Technically, the first man I called a cuck was Roosh. I don’t think he got it.

It’s psyops. It attacks their lifestyle.

By comparison, ‘cunt’ attacks the source of femininity and female power. It doesn’t really work unless you hate women. What’s so bad about having one? Men go into debt to rent one.
Everyone hates a skeeze and a traitor. They don’t care for truth but for selfish profit. They signal altruism but sell your future down the river, counting your shekels.

carrlthecuck

cuckecheese cuckfb cuckglenn cuckhappen

It relies on a tropism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_faith#Psychology

“While self-deception may be a tropism, not consciously done, it may be guided by “projects” one may set for one’s life, such as a desire for personal pleasure, wealth, power, or to get into heaven”

cuckles cuckonme

‘a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’

cuckreddit

We’ve been cucking for political parties for years, I simply pointed it out.
Fetish secondary definition: Voting for them while they screw us.

cucktales cucktrump everyoneisacuck

nowisnotthetime

wordofday

altrightrobot

To be perfectly frank, I’m surprised it spread this far.
I just thought the chicken anime thing was funny.

I suppose it demonstrates the finer principles of ‘why mockery?’ I discussed.
The truth won’t get a cuck’s attention. All they care about is reputation. Tell the truth about that, and he’ll listen to you. We keep using insults in circulation because they work.

I never thought pigs were the appropriate metaphor for bad men. Chickens.
Bland and annoying.

Well, there we are.

Finally.

Bonus question: in the original yodel video, it sounds like he’s saying another meme.
Which one could it be?

weareallshitpostershere

I recently became a meme so I’m trying to restore my meme karma.

Gen Z most conservative gen since the 40s

http://www.marcomm.news/gen-z-is-the-most-conservative-generation-since-those-born-before-1945/

I reported on the Gen Y conservative swing, especially the women.
Not surprising in light of the fact the Left is importing and siding with their rapists.

happy flanders

However, now the data on Gen Z is coming in and I said they’d be more extreme and splintered.

This aims to be a neat summary. Neat explanations are frequently superior.

Oh, this is gonna be fun. I can have fun with this.

The hypocrisy of the signalling Right

I lost a bet to write this because it’s the reddest of redpills. Shove it up your rectum, there’s plenty of room.

You’re probably not gonna like me for this. Stop reading if you’re easily trigg-ed (cough Forney cough).

But I call out these things wherever I see them. No penis passes. No ingrouping/No Enemies on the Right special appeals, because that is my point. You are not right wing, if we’re still going by what is likely an outdated paradigm based on behaviours, in light of identity politics, which are largely innate.

Literally most of the supposed Right Wing has a serious issue with hypocrisy. You wanna lead? #1 Be the example. Otherwise, GTFO. It’s literally the bare minimum for inclusion. If you want a stable society of smug marrieds, you need to get married or at least desire marriage if you meet your One. Don’t advise other people to do what you would not or cannot do yourself. You don’t get to ride the carousel and then complain why do carousels exist? You. You’re the consumer keeping this damaged system (SMP) in business.

Common sense, seriously.

Give up your own degeneracy THEN I’ll trust you’re opposed to it.

well leaves nope no go leaving

Otherwise, you’re an empty signalling piece of shit.
No better than the SJWs. Narcissism of small differences, it burns like your probable STDs.

The rest of us can totally see it. 20/20.
I’m finally pointing it out.

People who cannot control themselves seek to control others. This is the rule with SJWs and the people who repurpose the fashy memes seriously.  Note they don’t have the originality or sense of humour to come up with good ones themselves?
For example, these people with negative Social Intelligence come on here asking if I’m actually a man but anytime they wanna criticise me, I magically become a woman. Okay, that’s misogyny (and magical thinking) and all your claims to meritocracy fall flat when you do this. This is why feminists laugh at you, which is fine, but by extension and association (you steal our memes and terms) at people like me. The MSM loves you because you drag down us.

Minor point: I hate how being funny is now seen as a masculine thing when it’s really a gay thing. Going by pop culture. Which is actually a feminine thing, if we’re selecting a gender. I’m actually very femme in my critique. There’s nothing wrong with me. There is something wrong with expecting women to act like men (feminist programming, pornography) socially and sexually.

You think I’m bitchy? That isn’t an insult to an actual woman. I’m meant to be femme, fam.
I’m funny and I’m feminine. I don’t care if you approve or I’d camwhore on YT and sit next to Milo on panels for Old Media shekels.

Don’t like it?

well fuck off gary oldman

This isn’t a safe space for crybabies, I don’t give a damn which side you claim to be on. Know a tree by its fruit, motherfuckers and wifeswipers. If you think actual cuckoldry is funny, and Beta Bux, you aren’t really party to our level of integrity or the ideas discussed therein. We don’t actually hate other men. We critique politi-cucks because they sell out everyone and our futures, female and yes, your competition, other men. Real men. Men with a future. Manly men who don’t need to keyboard warrior themselves by slagging off the opposite sex before they cry to sleep at night, Tinder still open in their free hand.

It’s like the old people who ‘don’t get’ GIFs (cough Roosh cough). Well, you aren’t the target audience, how is that my problem? You’re acting like I should change the way I operate for your comfort.

Back to the people who judge everyone to distract from the total genetic and social failures of themselves. This doesn’t work.

They’ll bitch about Sandra Fluke slutting it up, but when they slut it up, that’s fine for society! It doesn’t increase everyone’s insurance payments, either, does it? They get real cagey about it. Why the shame? Why hide your face and name, AlphaBro5000?

I'm so vague I may as well be inhuman unless my ego catches up to me

If women were really attracted to your beliefs, why hide them IRL? It’s such a teenage fuck fantasy but coming from old men (30+, no excuse) discussing ‘swimming in pussy’ seriously it makes you wonder if the Western values can be saved. CM got to them and they don’t even know what they’re pushing. They care about being cool and would sell their souls to do it. It’s pathetic. People like that detract from our moral authority if we allow them to feed off our ideas, leech our readers and take donations (whores of Patreon) like a Church of Depravity. You know they aren’t paying taxes.

You can easily see them whining like entitled babies because they can’t find a Mummy to marry. Why? Society doesn’t owe you a whole other person, you have to earn it. Step 1: stop crying.

Their abandonment expectation pings strongly male borderline.
If you think everyone else (female) is crazy, get your own head checked, maybe.

They can’t get women because wife material aren’t lesbians. We see how bitchy and effete they are. Gay men are the original misogynists, as I’ve observed feminists point out in a rare, redpill moment.

They can’t attract women to the ideology because they try to kick us out. It’s intentional.

To quote Aurini, of all people;

Well who do they hate? They hate the original fans. All these movements, the masses show up and hate the founders. They wanna moderate the tone, make it more inclusive

The projection is strong and true. See the Alt Light. I called this months ago when they tried outgrouping the AR founders by calling us… cucks.

i don't even whatever

Oh noes, what-ever will be do?!!! Of all the insults? Are you kitten-mee?

why confused what wtf

I was aghast at the time. I mean, not bothered, they can’t stop us or our memes and they certainly can’t control us like that rant seemed to imply. We’re smarter. We have the IQ in this equation. We don’t scream into video cameras.

what ho whatwhat hello yep yes yeah we know english

On their own sites it’s worse. They censor like SJWs.

They think Ban Hammer makes them correct.

It’s the SJW paradigm. They have SJW tactics, like safe spaces, censoring and doxxing. They’ve tried to fake doxx me, which was relatively funny as a study in projection.

These people don’t wanna overturn the r-selected Sodom, they benefit from it. Watch what happens when you offer to restrict their porn to 18+. Wailing like a toddler. Is that a pro-family conservative value, people?

Here’s a tidbit of wisdom for ya.

What’s good for the goose, is good for the gander. Know what this means?

If it’s good for men, it’s good for women too. This is how logic works. Either the behaviour is prosocial or antisocial.

Nothing to do with feminist equality. Feminists breathe, breathing isn’t feminist.
Quit it with the non-sequiturs.

The Muh Dicks can go to the Middle East where their culture belongs, where they’ll feel really comfy in a Taharrush or Eve Teasing setup. Because a woman in a miniskirt is the problem and showing skin is evil (ask yourselves what species of ‘Christian’ is this and did it survive the Industrial Revolution). Meanwhile, men walk around with their bitch tits out and women magically resist the temptation to rape them.

Back to the rampant sexuality, which is meant to be healthy because Darwin? These people didn’t read Darwin, clearly. He’s very stern and disapproving of bestial sexualities. It’s inhuman. He discusses breeding, not ONSs. Hence, non-human animals are not degenerate, they lack the agency and choice and birth control.
Where exactly, did Darwin say this thing about men being able to fuck whatever and wherever? Where did the biology touch you, Jerry? No place for naturalistic fallacy, the average IQ of Alt Righters is higher than your Asian anime waifu. They’ll admit objectively that culture is over-sexualised, freely, but if you dare suggest, if you dare question Internet-Alpha-Man, that he might be oversexed and it might be unhealthy if you look at the psychiatry and suicide rates…. you must be a feminist because, apparently, they follow the Biblical virtue of prudence now?

Detour: They say ‘Double Standard’ like it’s an argument? They use it like a thought-terminating cliche, like a K/O instant win of the argument. This is the poison you get corrupting us from the manosphere. That’s not an argument. It’s basic logical hypocrisy. You say human rights, that applies to all humans. You say meritocracy, that is blind to anything identity and purely based on merit. Double Standard is a fallacy when there are two sets of rules to one society. It cannot work practically. It’s a logical inconsistency. Do you understand how stupid you sound?

It’s maths, you manwhores.
Has the HPV penetrated that much of your microbiome?
We all know about the hypofrontality. It’s brain damage, reeeee.

Women are people, worthy of respect. Women are half the equation for a prosperous society.

If you disagree with that, you’re not traditional.

The West was built off the backs and blood and sweat of good women and good men. Neither is the enemy. The feminists want that Gender War to have something to do. That isn’t looking in a mirror. Anyone who wants to turn you against your natural inclination to the opposite sex is an enemy to the nuclear family, they are anti-natal.

Ask these people if they want Hook-Up Culture, State Sponsored Abortions and Free (Taxpayer) Birth Control (chemical abortifacents). If they say Yes to any of these, they are Left wing. Instead, they are deceivers, trying to subvert the right wing with the promise of Free Goodies and dopamine addiction. Same way they did with the poor black community, look at your future.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Black-Mans-Guide-Out-Poverty/dp/1503119688

You’re just an inverted feminist, with the sexes switched out. Call yourselves MRA, you wanna rentseek and feed from the trough with the other piggies. Call yourselves MGTOW, you never actually Go, do you? You never leave women alone, especially online? You seek us out. It’s creepy. We can see you’re not doing any of the things you claim to be. We are smarter than you. You may delude yourself, other people aren’t wearing Blinders.

Men can err. Women can err. Neither sex is good or evil. Common sense.

They claim they want Patriarchy but a Patriarchy would’ve strung them up by now for corrupting their daughters and binge-drinking. Don’t get me started on the creepy pedophilia of sex tourism. They’re lying, they’re empty signalling hoping to win points from both sides.

The priors are all wrong, all the way down. Turtle logic. All the way down. The circular reasoning of It’s all female’s fault (fun fact: most women aren’t feminists) because I said so. …And? Anyone with your notch count, worse who’s proud of it, is no moral authority. This isn’t a game, this is the future of society at stake.

But women are natural conservatives, once we’ve bred and have something to protect, men are natural liberals if you look at any worker’s union, whether or not they breed. Look at the class pyramid Marx pointed out, the majority is working class and the majority of working class men vote Left, men are natural socialists because it backs up their natural provision duties. Quit projecting and look at the facts. If you look at voter trends as I have on here, men are the liberal problem. Quit applying American SJW on campus demo BS to the rest of the world. It’s a bubble. It isn’t real, look at the stats or be content in your laziness/ignorance.

It’s a class issue and SJWs will do anything to deny that, because they’re upper-middle privileged.
You don’t see working class men making bank by bitching on Youtube, do you? Too busy working to keep people like you in antibiotic shots, which thanks to people like you, are now failing.

The wages of sin used to be paid by the sinners. This was just.
These people will protect these things, this corrupt degeneracy, this ‘culture’.

After all this time, they still don’t get the Matrix references.
And these people claim to have founded us? Bich plz.

They don’t want to revolution or reform anything. They care for pleasure and being narcissists, pulling one over on conservatives by signalling as one while playing feminist to screw them too gives them extra shots of pozz dopamine.

They are parasite singles, as the Japanese correctly fingered. This is simple;

If someone claims to complain about degeneracy, they’d better not be contributing to it.

That’s the sound of a thousand body pillows being stuffed into mattresses in the distance.

Nod and back away from the crazies

The same people who never hold the male feminists and SJWs and founder of FEMEN accountable. Because Penis Pass. This is, to turn a phrase, hella dodgy.

There isn’t a separate Deadly Sins list for women and men. You’re either going to Hell in this White Christian society you claim to want, or you’re not. Simple enough reasoning, you’d think.

For pointing any of this out I get called a feminist. Really? Ad hominem doesn’t work, silly. I’m still correct and the points stand on their own merit whatever you dislike about my personality or my tone (tone policing wahey). Really, I was mean? Welcome to reality, remove the dummy from your gaping rainbow cakehole. You kiss your mama with that misogynist maw? If all women are whores, that includes your Mother. I tend to agree. Idiots cannot see their unintended consequences or unfortunate (logical) implications, but it’s funny to those of us with an IQ with digits of three.
Good luck keeping a Patriarchy when no woman will sleep with you, dipshits. You need our support and our complicity to breed. We aren’t robots that keep the babies of rape, either.

Consent requires a basic level of intelligence to know when and what to reject. [Also why if women can’t vote, fucking them would be pedophilia, legally. Either we have agency and can make such weighty decisions like reproduction or not. Pick ONE.]

Even ‘crazy’ feminists need the security of birth control before sleeping with the crazy of you, man who wants ‘no-strings’ sex like that has ever existed in the history of humanity. Sluts are damaged forever, but ignore player burnout. Why does no decent woman want me? [1]

Listen to yourselves.

I listen to myself.

Darwin doesn’t apply to sterile sex and even IF she got pregnant, you’d be the first lot to 180 your ‘principles’ (really signals) and demand an abortion OR an exemption from child support.

To quote pieces from elsewhere.

The world doesn’t owe you sex. That’s entitlement. No IFs or BUTs. That’s entitlement. Put down the porn. They’re the male Sandra Flukes expecting the rest of us to give them orgasms…. because they exist, therefore they deserve it.

Did porn tell you that?

porn cheat archer

If you think hypersexuality is a positive force for society, you’re a feminist.

The Sexual Revolution was feminist. The defining cornerstone. If you wouldn’t unwind that, you don’t want a Patriarchy. Either it existed historically, in which case the feminists are right, or it never existed like Male-Only Suffrage and you’re wrong. Again.
They have no power over men without sex, as the failed strike not to sleep with Trump supporters has proven. Turns out, most of his supporters were straight and female (women win elections in democracy by sheer force of numbers) so this is awkward. Your definitive woman-hating ideologies fail basic predictions. Congrats, you’re in the same category as global warming. Hug it out, happy non-breeder. 

They would agree with that sentiment, I think. I have no illusions where these supposedly right-wing males stand. The lays never lie. Your politics is proven by your personal life.

Women being biologically distinct from men doesn’t make us inferior. What I just described is sexual dimorphism. It’s a silly question, morality doesn’t apply in science. Feminists try to force the issue, doesn’t work. Either it’s true or it isn’t and if you choose to make spurious claims, yeah, people will think you’re full of it, because you’re hiding behind the apron strings of Science like a surrogate rhetorical Mommy. Oh, you have one study? Call Al Gore. At least he commits. Read a real book. The maximal difference is within chance level, about 5% tops. Unlike race, which you deny while using the term ‘racist’ for opponents. The modern human is androgynous too, so this is probably far less in our reality. Apply logic, remove Womb Envy (as real as Penis Envy).

Like, I’ve been here for years. Literally years. I know how this goes.

You can’t outsignal an original member.

These male entryists, these absolute antisocial degenerate losers wheedle their way into a successful cultural bandwagon (e.g. the Manosphere) and start booting out the original members that made it good (they don’t but it looks that way cos we leave). If this sounds familiar, it’s the SJW tactic that ruined Geek Culture.

Mainstream is fine. These people are cancer.

So they come up to people like me and try to outgroup me. Like Oh, it’s a shame the Alt Right has women, we don’t hate women but let’s all move to a homoerotic island for Male Supremacy.

“Let’s you and him fight” – this is the abuse tactic called triangulation.
Characteristic of gaslighters and rabbits, but I repeat myself.
Divide and conquer, like this is new? Like they invented this??

How stupid do they think we are?

Real men want a good wife and good children. They oppose anything that stands in the way of that ambition, the only real ambition if you remove contemporary culture selling you on the SATC ‘dream’ of materialism and sex blogging. They don’t get much joy out of bitching on a sausage-fest forum and crying into their hentai porn screen with the futility of someone who doesn’t deserve their fertility.

They burned down the manosphere and other associated groups and now they’re trying to do it with us.

It won’t work because we’re basing our material on reality and have smarter people naturally but if we don’t pay attention soon, removing the sin equivalent of kebab won’t be as easy. Our MSM rep will suffer. ‘Member that Vox Day (OK on other topics) claims to know what white people need to do better than we know ourselves. Why are we allowing the mystery meat to lecture us? Someone please explain the reasoning here. Isn’t this the problem in the first place, taking tips from the outgroup that hate us?

Misogyny, which does exist on the internet (as well as misandry, can’t have one without t’uther), rots any ideology that seeks to create a healthy society because men and women need each other and that’s nothing to be ashamed of. It isn’t bitchy/faggy/weak to want to breed and raise your spawn. Anyone who tries to shame you for the biological imperative to settle down and have a family is brainwashed. Essentially, if they say the nuclear family is good, they’re also claiming you’re not good enough to reproduce. Mellow on that thought.

The manosphere is the male equivalent of Carrie Bradshaw. If you find a good woman, you don’t need books on Text Games and Juicing Recipes. If you have kids, you don’t have time to give traffic views to their clickbait. You have unplugged from their system. The PUA scam relies on you being Forever Alone. Like its proponents.

If people want to let their genetics die with them, I think they should be encouraged.

These entryists burned down the manosphere with bitchy sweeping statements about all women. Sure, sure, NAWALT. But it’s true. It’s like when the feminists go on about men being rapists. It’s true that sweeping statements have no basis in reality. You’re being sexist. You are not judging the person based on their actions, but their sex, and making exemptions (a fallacy) based on a special sex. Just because you spend all your time in clubs surrounded by the worst quality people (birds of a feather) doesn’t make women in the same city like that. There’s an egregious problem with Americans projecting and trying to World Police the sexuality of the world (non-America).

You are Sodom. Sort yourself out.
You are the hub of degeneracy. No pity party for you. No limp-dick standing around Won’t Someone Do Something? You’re the Alpha Males, that means it’s your fault. Responsibility is an alien concept to r-types, even the somewhat self-aware ones for sexual manipulation (rape) purposes.

Magical White Man isn’t going to ride in and save you. You are not the victim, you are the criminal. You caused this mess. You are not Princess Peach in need of rescue from the meanies. Don’t try to Snowflake while throwing up bravado. It doesn’t work. It fools nobody. Hypoagency is a feminist lie. Men have as much self control as women. You are possibly more responsible if you believe in ‘Men should lead’ theories. Since leaders bear the brunt, logically.

Society doesn’t improve because men won’t improve.

That doesn’t mean notch counts, this isn’t Pacman.

The West won’t save itself because the men are expecting women to rescue them.

It’s simple.

Don’t be degenerate. If you ‘can’t’ do this, why do you expect your kind to do it too?

Unless you don’t expect change, which makes you a vacuous, signalling liar.

Impotent or deceptive, it can only be one.
Either way, we don’t want you. The problem is not with us.

^HINT.
After this, most obvious of signs, flashy neon, they still won’t get it.

Sure, these people masterminded the whole meme thing, right, Alt Right?

[1]  Really I should trash-compact my points less. I know.

And being nice gets you nothing. That’s called the First World standard. It’s the minimum. You aren’t special for being polite to women because women are people, the same way women aren’t entitled to a drink because they smiled at a guy.

A puppy is nice.

Nobody wants to fuck a puppy.

Have the standards for husband slipped so low?

The self-aware r-types try to win women from both sides by signalling K. Run away. They’re crazy. Leave them to the cokeheads and sluts. Let the genetic suicides get on with it and burn out their pleasure circuits. Yes, that’s what (player) burnout is.

Link: Assortative mating and class

http://www.unz.com/jman/the-son-becomes-the-father/

Hardly any social mobility. No hypogamy. No hypergamy (the small-scale sociology theory seems to be wrong over many generations when you look at the genetics). I wasn’t expecting that. It shows psychology has its limits too, when they’re looking in the wrong place (teachers) and asking the wrong questions (how valuable is an education?).

What we see is clearly an argument for sexually selective Leagues. (Bear in mind, it would count MMV as well as SMV). It seems to be mostly genes.

The idea that this transmission of status over time has been as Clark found it squares well with another facet I discuss frequently on this blog: the fact that parenting doesn’t have much of a lasting effect on children’s outcomes.

Although parenting can let the team down if it’s atrocious (i.e. modern) and without instinct. But it seems later generations might have hope of regaining lost ground. Presumably there’s regression to mean in parenting quality, and since most people are totally forgotten by the 4th generation it’s no wonder we see no effect.

The interesting thing is that even the people who take me seriously on this point still believe that there’s something their efforts can do, beyond keeping their children fed, clothed, clean, and cognizant of the basic ways of the world. Steven Sailer frequently suggests that the outcome of poorer children, especially those of color (mostly Hispanics) would improve if they had fewer of them, and hence could afford to invest more in each, despite the fact that this doesn’t hold up in adoption studies.

It’s an oxytocin-based instinct, but it only seems that the majority of the affectionate instinct actually needs to be applied to the spouse (in both directions) to maintain the stability for the children. Another reason divorced parents are awful. Also, I wonder whether this would change the minds of any cuckolds saying they ‘don’t mind’ if a child isn’t theirs, as long as they raise them? This applies to women raising the children of former wives too.

This study found that “cultural transmission” (i.e., from parents) couldn’t explain the pattern seen in children (indeed, the parent-child correlation was negative once you removed heredity). The non-parental environment explained the variance, suggesting that other influences, such as peers, likely explain the results.

Why else do you think mothers care so much about who their child has for friends?
It can predict crime, drug use and all sorts (peer pressure).

This issue squares the matter with Gregory Clark’s results. That is, when you consider other facets, education per se doesn’t seem to mean much in the end. Apparently, you can’t teach moxie. This is revealed by the fact that every trait “going in” that shapes a person (and should be relevant to educational attainment) reliably shows absolutely no shared environment impact.

The Middle Class fallacy. Grit and resilience come into it too (the upper class have it, the middle class despise it).
You could put little Tarquin in the best school to ever exist, it won’t make him a genius.

…including one’s work preferences and interests, the presence or absence of mental disorders, and including the features of a person we think of as “character.” Parents leave no lasting effect on any of it, aside from what they bequeath to their children genetically….

The upper class try to teach their children life skills like grit too.
The middle class assumes it will just happen. Guess who wins.
We’ve all heard comparisons of our character or habits to deceased family members, right?
I would like to see hobbies compared genetically because birth order and sibling rivalry supposedly make children opt into different ones despite genetic similarity.

Who you choose to have children with is the most important decision of your entire life. No pressure. 

Indeed, when we consider the effect of measurement error (adding it to the heritability estimate and to the somewhat nonsensical negative gene-environment correlation values), the heritability of political attitudes and social values skyrockets, being upwards of 85% (74%) for views towards pornography in women (men). The heritability of overall political orientation, when accounting for measurement error, teeters on 100%!

Liberals and conservatives will be battling for a long time to come.

Bodes well for r/K.
I think this is why K-types seem so betrayed when divorced. Total speculation. I’m sure a lot of spouses cheated on would like to stone the 3rd party responsible. Religion is a good excuse to kill the competition.

(Hence the “shared environment” ≠ “all environment.”)

That needs to be made clear for the all  would-be sociologists.

But that’s all OK, yes? The whole point of education is to “shape” the raw individual beyond his/her genetic predilection, right? Wrong.

Education cannot change potential, it can only improve performance up to the ceiling OF potential, how many times do I have to say this?

The problem is that everything that comes out, the adultout comes, shows a shared environment impact that is also zero.

If your parents were screw-ups and couldn’t hold a marriage together, you’ll probably be a screw-up too. It’s the circle of life.

OK, so you might be willing to accept that you can’t shape your child’s personality or values. You can’t control his major life outcomes. You can’t even control how much money he will go on to earn. But surely you can do something useful, like leave your children a lifetime of happiness, right? After all, I believe, and advise, that a parent’s key duty, after ensuring that their children grow up healthy and safe, is to ensure that each has a happy childhood. Surely that must count for something, too,? It does, in the form of fond memories of childhood.

This is so brutal. So redpill.
The lesson is choose your spouse wisely and once you’ve got them, stick with them. You can’t choose your own genetic profile, but you can damn well choose theirs! (This is why women are so selective).

One’s lifetime of happiness boils down to genes and to the fickleness of luck.

yes lestat dancing happy cheery morbid black comedy

I’m one of the lucky people who can be contented in a shed.
It’s like when I was told Follow your Dreams and the money will follow! I was always like ‘but if you are happy, why do you still need the money to justify your decision?’, that art teacher did not like me, not one bit. School really is a prison but that’s news to nobody, frankly. You’re there to do a thing (pass grades) and finally they grant your release. Might as well game the system and learn other, more useful things with their resources while you’re there.

He will be who he will be. It’s only my job to help him get there, and pass on the legacies of all those who came before him. I did all I could do: I married well. Beyond that it’s in the hands of “fate”.

That’s the healthy parental attitude, not the Trophy Child, as I call them, where they need something to brag about like it’s a prize-winning pet or the Dead Dreams Model where the child is pressured to do what the parent wishes they had (a whole career, not little stuff).

The vagaries of the circumstances no doubt imbued good fortune on some and dashed the success of many others.

Whether your society (born into) was just and meritocratic, I’d wager.

But through it all, the thing that is at the root of continuity – DNA – remained the active ingredient to propagate lineages in their respective places through out the ages.
It is as it was said in the Richard Donner Superman films: “The son becomes the father, and father becomes the son.

Superman quotes now? Epic.

The genetics of politics

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/08/120827122410.htm

…This paradigm shift has led to novel insights into why people vary in their political preferences and could have important implications for public policy.

“We’re seeing an awakening in the social sciences, and the wall that divided politics and genetics is really starting to fall apart,” says review author Peter Hatemi of the University of Sydney. “This is a big advance, because the two fields could inform each other to answer some very complex questions about individual differences in political views.”…

Study: The self-control consequences of political ideology

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/06/17/1503530112.abstract
Other coverage here: phys.org/pdf354215618.pdf
and here: http://phys.org/news/2015-06-liberals
and here: http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-06-belief-free-edge-self-control.html

Oh, r-types.

They want to be victims so badly, they learn helplessness and dependence and stamp their little feet. They reject their agency and wonder why nobody takes them seriously.

Gif is completely, totally relevant.

 

Video: Evolutionary laziness and political allegiance

As for the brain stuff, the forebrain evolved after the hindbrain and the nature/nurture discussions come down to whether primacy can be changed (obscured by hemidominance discussions, this is what they really mean). I think it is possible but the effort expended would be greater than the dividend. Nature always wins.

Hemisity: http://www.psych-it.com.au/Psychlopedia/article.asp?id=263