Why are terrorist attacks so shocking to Westerners?

From the immigrants, specifically.

http://gameofthrones.wikia.com/wiki/Guest_right

I had to pick something you’ d actually read.

IRL section

It has been argued that in the Book of Genesis, the violation of hospitality is what truly made Sodom and Gomorrah considered to be wicked, resulting in God condemning everyone in the cities to die. In the narrative, God decides to destroy the cities but Abraham implores him to have mercy and spare the cities if even ten righteous people could be found there. God therefore sent two angels disguised as men to Sodom, who were refused hospitality by all until they encounter Abraham’s nephew Lot, who had recently moved to Sodom with his family. Lot welcomes the two as guests into his home, and eats with them at his table. A crowd of men from the city later gathers outside of Lot’s home and demands that he send the two strangers out of his house, “so that we might know them” (have sex with them). Lot is so horrified at their intentions that he even offers to let the crowd of men voluntarily have sex with his own virgin daughters rather than allow the two men who are his guests to be harmed.

That’s how serious it was.

The crowd refuses but the angels then reveal their true forms, strike the crowd blind, and warn Lot that he and his family must leave the city at once. Sodom and Gomorrah are destroyed at dawn by God raining down fire and brimstone from the heavens.

Refugees welcome?

SJWs do not protect them maternally, but based on hospitality.
Cut that bond and obligation, the defense is severed.

Going back to the last time this happened, why were we kind to the Jews before the end of WW2? Same reason. It’s the exact same reason.

Why are the Greeks such pushovers?

Many subsequent generations interpreted the story of Sodom and Gomorrah to be a condemnation of homosexual sex acts (to the point that “sodomy” became a common term for homosexual sex acts), but modern biblical scholars have pointed out that the inhabitants of Sodom are never explicitly condemned for engaging in homosexual sex. Rather, the crowd of men gathered outside Lot’s house did not horrify him simply because they wanted to engage in homosexual sex, but because they wanted to rape and harm guests within his own home, whom he had formally extended his protection over as part of guest right.

While other books of the bible (i.e. Leviticus) condemn homosexuality, the violation of the laws of hospitality is considered to be an infinitely worse transgression. The Midrash contains numerous commentaries and stories about the villainies of the Sodomites, not particularly focusing on homosexual sex but on their overall cruelty, including accounts of them horribly killing those who showed mercy to the poor.

This also explains the Celtic hesitance here to punish the violators.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospitality#Celtic_cultures

Celtic societies also valued the concept of hospitality, especially in terms of protection. A host who granted a person’s request for refuge was expected not only to provide food and shelter for his/her guest, but to make sure they did not come to harm while under their care.

Except we granted them nothing, other immigrants in the system decided, and refuge is temporary.

reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2g87dd/was_there_an_equivalent_in_medieval_times_to/

Likewise, guests were to not abuse a host’s hospitality, but to behave honorably and appreciatively. There are many ancient Greek stories that hinge on violations of xenia. That is, in western culture today, it’s considered bad manners to treat your guest or host rudely, but it was a much more significant violation of the social code to behave in such a way in Ancient Greece. Actually, the same can be said in the Old Testament. 

Ancient etiquette, national honour.

Given the outcome of Sodom, am I concerned about mass immigration?

Not particularly, although I probably should move.

Examples: if you’ve read The Odyssey, you’ll see a huge component of the story is the Suitors living in Odysseus’s house, and taking advantage of his hospitality.

Tick tock.

about Lot

 (This passage is, in my opinion, meant humorously, but that element has been lost in time and in the desire of some to take the Bible literally).

Take my daughters!
translation
Nothing is sacred.

on GOT

 Ultimately, despite my love of GRRM and his work, it’s almost a sign of laziness to identify this as #basedonhistory. It’s not. It’s pirated from history and redressed as Ren’Fayre-bleak. The world relies so heavily on the audiences expectations how a ‘feudal society’ operates that it gets away with never having to explain anything at all.

Exactly, he doesn’t get the mind. He only writes bland, vacant nihilism – the angsty teen edition and the pomo Boomer who fucks and drinks and is really funny to himself/happy only when bitter and drunk.

Guest rights and rituals of hospitality existed across not only medieval Europe but across recorded time in history. Whether this is greeting an incomer by extending a hand in ‘friendship’ (or simply to show you’re not holding a weapon) to offering tea and biscuits to demonstrate to your daughter-in-law that you’re not going to bite her head off for daring to cross the threshold.

This could be considered our cardinal value as a race, the broader umbrella, white kind.

https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/events/hospitality-protection-and-refuge-in-early-english-law

Essentially, the rapefugees claim sanctuary then desecrate any form of right we gave them.
The term sexual terrorism applies, they violate beyond the physical to mock our culture.

This seminar places Anglo-Saxon (c.600-1100) legal treatments of refuge in the context of a broader web of ideas, looking at the problems that hospitality could raise by giving potentially threatening outsiders protection without simultaneously integrating them into local legal networks, and the various ways we find laws trying to address these problems without denying people’s right to protect their guests in principle.

Politeness is the pleasant parent of PC.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1893554392/qid=1143761279/sr=1-8/ref=sr_1_0_8/026-1234967-5390809

http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2006/03/please_can_we_s.html

First, political correctness is a stern, fierce movement which is completely sane and sets out deliberately to stop us from saying – and thinking – various things. It is not a joke, nor is it out of control. It is deliberate, purposeful and serious. Those who enforce it plan to change the world and they will succeed for as long as we treat PC as a laugh, or as some sort of batty bureaucratic mix-up which will go away in the end.

Cultural Marxism would intersect here.

…We also need to realise that it has one very powerful weapon. It poses as the friend of good manners. It claims that it is the only force that can stop people being rude, dismissive or unpleasant to racial minorities or homosexuals. It pretends that it is the only movement that is interested in improving the lives of women

They want to disinherit us from our culture by handing it over to guests who want to water it down. We can’t move away but we try.

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/why-is-totalitarianism-demanded-by.html

Totalitarianism is the natural end-point for modern, mainstream secular Leftism; and now that ‘everybody’ in The West is on the Left and primarily secular (including self-identified ‘right wingers’ and ‘Christians’) – ‘everybody’ is united in demanding totalitarian thought control.

In suppressing dissenting voices, it is their own thoughts that crave to be controlled. When life is understood as nothing but subjective feelings, then the idea is for our-selves to be manipulated into having the best feelings: we want to be convinced by soothing propaganda, we want a pleasing alternative reality…

Hence my contempt for the signalling right, the fakers.
They are blue pill as the rest. Cowards scurrying to hide badfeels.

from The tragedies of Euripides translated by R. Potter
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tragedies-Euripides-Translated-R-Potter/dp/1143759370

To be unwise with the unwise is painful. 

it continues

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ONIIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA307&lpg=PA307&dq=who+dares+not+speak+his+free+thoughts+is+a+slave

Full treatise here

http://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.co.uk/

Any time someone gives me shit for valuing freedom and being gobby about it As A Woman, I can’t help but wonder how fundamentally illiterate they are.

We only need defend ourselves when our men fail us.

Or is the fairer sex supposed to sit on our arses and pretend to agree with the rapists and their defenders? Isn’t that then a betrayal? A morally strong woman is not a threat to a man with strength to match. Our job is virtue and keeping virtues clear in the public mind (to chastise, from the verb chaste) and defend virtue (child-rearing).

http://thebackbencher.co.uk/political-correctness-is-the-death-knell-of-free-speech/

If only we had a word.

Yes, attacking our children, state, monarchs and way of life are affronts.
It flies in the face of Nurture dogma.
It suggests the better we treat them, the more they hate us.
Irrespective, it is most repugnant to the high trust groups, that survived the Ice Age with tribal bonds (read A Troublesome Inheritance). You want civic nationalism? You ‘integrate’ and ‘assimilate.’ This doesn’t appear possible. It never was. We’re noticing too early.
The pathologically altruistic Whites are still reeling from disbelief, mind boggled, and writing these off as random madness, strange coincidence, than deliberate treason and violation of our sacred, tolerant hospitality.

The consequences for misjudging intent would be too severe, because we would violate it ourselves.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/category/pathological-altruism-among-whites/

There isn’t something wrong with us. We didn’t evolve for this situation. We evolved for ingroup preference. Multiculturalism was deliberately planned to exterminate us. To ‘kill us with (our own) kindness’.

Look at the slogans. Hope, not Hate?

Hope for what? Love, not hate? Where is the love indeed, Black Eyed Peas?

The bleached 20th Century American vision of Christianity, do nothing.

Push this button.

Keep pushing.

…They’ll have nothing.

Kindness of the Whites based on sanctuary is the glue of the anti-West, the anti-white.
Ah, but paleface, they’ll say, sanctuary can only be extended to those within the same religion.
They will claim they were never our guest, never accepted hospitality, but soldiers, and can therefore kill us with impunity. Do whatever they want, they even have a religious instruction manual.

We’re pagans, racially. They can kill pagans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword_Verse

http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/pagansources.htm

Ironically, they are pagans worshiping the Kaba stone.

We gave these people life itself, through foreign aid, charities keeping their governments afloat, a home here… and they do this. The Saxon is beginning to hate – the ungrateful guest.

Consider how prosperous we’d be, if we’d left them all alone and never imposed our charity.

The scientific term is compassion fatigue, Stefan.

Video: Political correctness

Oh, people know.

They just don’t say anything.

Each sketch in this film is said to contain different social critiques.

This is from the greatest film of all time, Movie 43.

Called the worst film of all time by Hollywood.
Critics have no sense of humour anymore.
It mocks Hollywood and uses its own techniques as rope to hang it by.

They want shock value?

The hook is that respected Broadway and Oscar-winning actors signed up.

The critics don’t understand when something is supposed to be crass.

It’s a parody – that’s the joke. It’s dialed to 11. Actually, it isn’t stupid if you think about what literally happens.

Once the shock value wears off, there are interesting questions.

Such as in Leprechaun, do we only take an interest in minorities to make money off them?

Tall Poppy Syndrome and the myth of equality

http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/102769

Now, all of these in fact have been the economic effects of pursuing far too much equality, and I think we have very much now come to the end of the road. And, in fact, we find that the persistent expansion of the role of the state, beyond the capacity of the economy to support it, and the relentless pursuit of equality has caused, and is causing, damage to our economy in a variety of ways. It’s not the sole cause of what some have termed the ‘British sickness’ but it is a major one.

Now, what are the lessons then that we’ve learned from the last thirty years? First, that the pursuit of equality itself is a mirage. What’s more desireable and more practicable than the pursuit of equality is the pursuit of equality of opportunity. And opportunity means nothing unless it includes the right to be unequal and the freedom to be different.

One of the reasons that we value individuals is not because they’re all the same, but because they’re all different. I believe you have a saying in the Middle West: ‘Don’t cut down the tall poppies. Let them rather grow tall.’ I would say, let our children grow tall and some taller than others if they have the ability in them to do so. Because we must build a society in which each citizen can develop his full potential, both for his own benefit and for the community as a whole, a society in which originality, skill, energy and thrift are rewarded, in which we encourage rather than restrict the variety and richness of human nature.

Diversity!

Read Genius Famine.
n.b. The problem of obedience in schools also applies to the military.

Now, holding these views as strongly as I do, you can imagine that I was particularly interested to read a description of some of the problems in Czechoslovakia. And the description went like this—and I’ll tell you the year to which it referred in a moment. ‘The pursuit of equality’—I’m quoting—‘has developed in and unprecedented manner [end p147] and this fact has become one of the most important obstacles to intensive economic development and higher living standards. The negative aspects of equality are that lazy people, passive individuals, and irresponsible employees profit at the expense of dedicated and diligent employees, that unskilled workers profit at the expense of skilled ones, that those who are backward from the viewpoint of technology profit at the expense of those with initiative and talent.’

The problem isn’t women, even the ditzy ones. It’s a systemic issue.
You see the same moral weakness in all-boys schools, for instance.

Video: Feminists admit rape gangs, angry

Many councils broke out the shredders so their Rotherham-like state sponsored child abuse doesn’t come out.

The denial shows the real r-types, protecting the pedophiles at any cost to the outgroup.

New Yorker: Trump as literally Hitler

hahaha fuck you

http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/philip-k-dicks-intellectual-vision-for-living-in-a-fascist-america

drive-by bitching today

“plausible” – they keep using that word a lot…..

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

“reverse the New Deal,” correct me if i’m wrong, …but that sucked?

I was taught at school it basically saved the West and these same textbooks were wrong on plenty of other stuff once you read around them, as almost nobody did.

“decades later, the world is ruled by fascist powers.”
unlike the EU
“A year later, the show’s second season has arrived amid a resurgence of real-life white nationalism”
[citation needed]
“As a man with a vocal admiration for authoritarian leaders is about to be sworn into the White House”
if the words hurt them, imagine the guy who comes after Trump
the force of the full pendulum swing might kill them
Pence is the real Republican and Trump knew he’d be competition in a future election, the man is not dumb, he pretends to be, like a less cuddly Boris Johnson, better thought of as the snake of Westminster. 
>The past is not the present, this reality is not sci-fi. Stop.
you must be new here
These people are academics??????
ffs this is why they lost
everything is Hitler, shares in Hitler memes, buy buy buy
they tried really hard to make the nazis look bad in that show, like – they have cameras
but the modern internet is worse so…. nah
no crime, no disease, but they have cameras, goys
“non-Aryan people, and their culture, have been eradicated”
I am a lady and I won’t rise to that bait.
omg why no facepalm god ugh wut
The urbanites really hate the idea they’ve been replaced, huh?
Your politics are not relevant, guy in a studio apartment.
You can tell they’ve been getting their politics from comedians for too long.
“shows Americans adapting to fascism with an alarming smoothness” idiots
implying all americans are white and xian
true, but idiots
shooting themselves in the foot
like in every white man, a Hitler crouches, waiting to spring out
….like, I wish they had at least one ball…
anything but a weeb, basically
Hitler is really just this century’s Napoleon anyway.
“Tuesdays, they burn cripples, the terminally ill,” he says. “Drags on the state.”
…..this person either knows nothing about communist state murder or chooses to ignore it
and if they’re terminally ill, that’s euthanasia, which they support
#factsarehard
“For those not targeted for elimination, the show suggests—for nice young white men like Joe Blake in particular—the American Reich would not be terrifying at all. It might, in fact, look a lot like the America we already know.”
youliar
I demand 50 privilege points for this gif.
Harry is the epitome of white privilege, he is literally magic and saves the world with Saviour Complex.
the 2nd season was just banal, tepid, so-so
the death potion scene in fantastic beasts was fucking disturbing and that’s a kid’s film
“Yet it becomes worryingly easy to overlook his atrocious misdeeds,”
>heroes must be spotless jesus figures, implies the jew
they dropped the brackets trend pretty quickly when it revealed their power levels, didn’t they?
“an expert emotional manipulator who terrorized subordinates and innocents alike” 
that's enough stop please karen will and grace
-all the judgemental stares for that vacuous comment-
a competent, intelligent white man with no vices is now satan
how far has popular culture sunk
even superman is killing illegal aliens
if Trump turns out to be milquetoast, all bluster, will they hate him more, or less?
” In another year, the show’s insistence on humanizing fascists might have seemed like a provocative choice”
…….lolwut
dehumanizing people IS fascism
fascists are people, human and capable of love cos this isn’t a fucking disney story, it’s reality
“when it is more urgent than ever to distinguish right from wrong, real news from fake, and differences of political opinion from the dangerous undermining of democracy”
things the vatican would say for $200
“the dangerous undermining of democracy”
people voting for someone we don’t like, this undermines my right to win, somehow
still think trump is controlled opposition
the jewish line is too hard and pushed too hard
the resistance to socialism is often full of shitty people, they can’t be both pro-state and rebels, these bloody signallers
“moral desperation, a loss of faith in anything but self-destructive violence”
r/atheism
“unavoidable complicity of living “normally” under empire”
bull-shit, son
nobody has a choice there, it’s live or die, until you can vote in someone new
the hero never has a family, cos he wouldn’t risk them for his ego
“a novelist—an eccentric inventor of alt-histories who served as a stand-in for Dick himself”
is that an allusion to alt-right
is this like the new voldemort
you don’t pronounce the T, it’s silent, so it’s really alt-rye. we are big on gluten.
all-aryan heritage grains, really, which is germinatedly superior
artists step out of the politically correct because it’s morally wrong
*mic drop*

You can see why it’s called the Jew Yorker, can’t you?
well if white identity politics is morally wrong, in a time of relativism, and jews are white, and not a race*, and up is down, every jewish person is literally hitler? #sjwlogic

blackadder I know sarcastic

*implies Israel/Judea is not anybody’s homeland, because those exist for races, not religions