If you can’t say it, you can’t think it.
In 1989, the New South Wales parliament in Australia passed the Anti-Discrimination Act that includes these chilling passages, Orwellian in their implications:
The law invests in the Anti-Discrimination Board the power to* determine whether a report is ‘fair,’ and whether a discussion is ‘reasonable,’ ‘in good faith,’ and ‘in the public interest.’ The Board will pronounce upon the acceptability** of artistic expression, research papers, academic controversy, and scientific questions. An unfair (i.e., inaccurate) report of a public act may expose the reporter and the publisher to damages of up to $40,000.3
*Laws can’t change shit about reality, they have no such “power”.
**The worst kind of church.
The Left always does the same thing: pretends to be nice, gets in power, censors, punishes, intimidates, introduces freedom-killing laws and eventually shoots free-thinkers in the back of the head when re-education*** fails.
Gaslighting*** when an individual does it.
The Berkeley police finally restored order, moving the crowd out of the building and into the street, where they continued to chant, shout, and demonstrate.
“Demonstrate” civil unrest ya mean?
It isn’t a violent mob if it’s students?
Shoot them like dogs if they won’t act like humans.
Use the pellets if you aren’t hard enough for bullets. Water jets?
Since Irving’s invitation to speak came from the Berkeley Coalition for Free Speech, they apparently also no longer teach irony at that institution.
ba dum dum tssh
And given the horrific history of race relations in America such hate speech laws could be rationalized
Is that a joke?
as relevant to the claim that there are genetically-determined differences between blacks and whites
Races do exist, it’s the basis of forensics?
in intelligence, because such information (whether true or false) might lead white supremacists and other bigots to commit violence against blacks.
THE TRUTH IS NOT AN EXCUSE.
THE TRUTH IS NOT AN EXCUSE.
Because parts of science may be true but not all science is legal to discuss.
Land of the FREEEEEEEEE…..
Or, considering the long struggle women have had to gain parity to men,
one could argue
if one is a liar
that research on gender differences in cognitive abilities could turn back the clock on women’s rights
The economy isn’t suddenly going to lose the majority of its workforce on a Maybe.
should a disparity be found in favor of the gender still dominant in positions of power.
The laws showing favour to women are based in those differences, same with race.
You cannot deny those differences while pushing for laws founded on them.
Since people act on their beliefs,
Not violently, they don’t. Unless you curtail their freedom to passively avoid.
Freedom of association keeps society peaceful.
and beliefs are expressed in the form of speech,
To be challenged.
You can’t challenge someone who isn’t talking.
isn’t it reasonable to argue that certain scientific findings be categorized as a form of hate speech that should be censored?
Science describes reality.
You do not have the power to censor reality.
You cannot magically raise African nations’ IQs either. This is King Canute levels of delusion.
Social engineering was a fraud. Head Start didn’t work on little white Timmy either!
Diverse or equal, you cannot claim both. First place or no winners, pick. Merit or bias?
What they really want is a visible hierarchy you are forbidden to question.
To know who rules over you….
Thankfully, the populace always outnumbers them. And more people means more brains noticing the same observations and reality.
People will notice and if you make it taboo, they’ll think about it more.
That’s how oppression works.
Angela Merkel admitted the experiment of multiculturalism failed, why can’t we discuss this?
Hate speech is a postmodern construct that won’t last the century. You cannot rule a feeling illegal. The CPS are not psychics divining feelings from the ether and it isn’t enforced equally, it’s enforced against whites and therefore, illegal by our original founding laws. “Protected groups”, the basis for the “positive” discrimination (end) of justice do not exist either because we are all equal under the law according to the true and real law. Justice is blind. And if science is to be believed, everyone is racist, so either it doesn’t count by neutralisation OR every crime, is a hate crime – that’s impossible to enforce and again, neutralises.
Stereotypes are statistically true and if social science continues to deny its un-PC findings, it will find itself de-funded, put on trial for abuse of position and on the wrong side of history.
Under the law equality is a legal construct, technically a legal fiction.
For example, the legal fiction will expect a man can run to a fire alarm until in a case one turns up to court in a wheelchair. Then the fiction dissolves, in that case. It is not kid gloves, the way it’s treated.
Being treated with dignity is something else entirely, mostly a personal decision (they mis-inform to bias) to treat someone as average, above or below (but still human) and the law cannot demand respect from one subject to another, no man can insist on being accorded honourable status without earning it.
The Honour’s List is a joke, full of preening narcissists.
The law has over-stepped its place for decades. We never needed a race relations act for millennia! If people can’t act like civilized First Worlders, should they even be here? To be tolerated in our land is their privilege, their immigrant privilege, not their right.
Even that has its conditions and that applies to say, whites in Africa.
As for Europe?
They never conquered us and we never voted for them to be nor remain here.
We refuse to worship invaders and kiss the toes of traitors.
Positive = Punishing children for what their fathers might’ve done. Treating natives as second-class in their rightful homeland because treating anyone as second class is what evil tyrants do.
They never enforce by class, do they? You’ll find most non-whites protected by such laws are middle-class against the working-class aka it’s social INJUSTICE.
It’s become illegal to offend the middle class.
Nobody gives a shit if Christian white van man is offended. Oh, but volunteer for the army, and you won’t get hired in the police!
The new no Irish signs.
The justification of such laws in the consequentialist argument that people might be incited to discrimination, hate, or violence if exposed to such ideas fails the moment you turn the argument around and ask:
Thinking is not a crime, a thought is not violence.
Any idea that can die with the slightest criticism, should.
They have one job and people are noticing the lies.
If you won’t inform them of the truth, they’ll hate you.
Scientism: the false belief that objective reality is politically correct.
Scientism is dying, like the non-whites and women science pretends aren’t any different, and so cannot legally develop functional medication for!
[Metaphor is also not dehumanizing or all Disney films are illegal.]
[i’m always extra]
Tangents, get cha tangents here!