This article analyzes the effortful control of automatic processing related to social and emotional behavior, including control over evolved modules designed to solve problems of survival and reproduction that were recurrent over evolutionary time. The inputs to effortful control mechanisms include a wide range of nonrecurrent information–information resulting not from evolutionary regularities but from explicit appraisals of costs and benefits. Effortful control mechanisms are associated with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the ventral anterior cingulated cortex. These mechanisms are largely separate from mechanisms of cognitive control (termed executive function) and working memory, and they enable effortful control of behavior in the service of long range goals. Individual differences in effortful control are associated with measures of conscientiousness in the Five Factor Model of personality. Research in the areas of aggression, ethnocentrism, sexuality, reward seeking, and emotion regulation is reviewed indicating effortful control of automatic, implicit processing based on explicit appraisals of the context. Evidence is reviewed indicating that evolutionary pressure for cooperation may be a critical adaptive function accounting for the evolution of explicit processing.
Incentives are everything. Stop saying degeneracy and other weakness is okay.
THE BBC has come under fire for broadcasting a segment on Halal meat on Sunday night’s Countryfile with viewers accusing the Corporation of hitting a “new low” and “justifying vile Halal slaughter practices on our soil”.
Mr Heap said: “Like some other religions how the animal is killed is significant and for Muslims that means Halal slaughter in which a blessing is said before the animal dies.
Discussing the practice the Imam said: “There are certain practices where you want to fulfil a commandment of God and you’re basically invoking God’s name upon that. You are making the sacrifice in the name of God and now it’s made Halal. Halal means permissible and it’s been made permissible by God for you.”
It isn’t our God. That’s a violation of our human rights.
BELGIUM is set to challenge European Union laws on halal and kosher slaughter in a court case that could have massive repercussions across the bloc.
The french-speaking region of Wallonia, on September 1, will become the second Belgian authority to ban halal and kosher slaughter in a move to ban killing animals without first stunning them.
It’s barbaric. They try to call it “traditional” in our news propaganda but it isn’t traditional here, it doesn’t belong here and never will. Also, the Muslim religion is so young it should barely merit anyone’s consideration.
Flanders first introduced a ban, which came into effect on New Year’s Day, on the Muslim and Jewish ways of ritually slaughtering animals. Critics of the ban have suggested the move comes as part of a shift to an anti-immigrant shift across Belgium as the right-wing Flemish nationalists continue to cement themselves in mainstream politics.
Or Europe wants to be European? If they don’t like it, fuck off home.
While the court could take up to two years, any decision could set a precedent for the whole of the European Union.
A number of EU countries, such as Denmark, Sweden and Denmark, have banned traditional slaughter without stunning.
But the court challenge will test European laws between animal welfare and religious freedoms across the bloc.
The freedom not to eat that shit?
Mohamed Bouezmarni, the head of the Muslin association in the town of Arlon, has warned bans could drive the ritual slaughter underground.
He told Politico: “Everyone will do it at home, or in some corner, hidden from view.
Grounds for deportation.
“I think that is not the animal activist’s aim.”
Pinchas Goldschmidt, the president of the Conference of European Rabbis, warned Jews were left as “collateral damage” while bans targeted the Muslim community.
Go home to Judea. Nobody cares.
Europeans want their continent to have our own people’s practices.
That’s our birthright.
If you go to Y. Tube and look up hal al slaughter you will see the horrific abuse these animals are put through , they are kicked , thrown about , and the sheer terror is plain to see in the animals. This barbaric practice is abhorrent , worse till in moos lime countries , were people, including children stand and watch, laughing at the terrified animals, and blood running down the streets .
I have seen it for real in a slaughter house about 50 years ago. The animal to be killed and those in close proximity can hear, smell and sense it and the cries and screams they make is awful to hear and see them struggling. The problem with the meat though is that any animal that suffers unnecessary or undue stress means that their bloodstream is packed with endorphins that are released and it is said that the meat does not taste as good as it would do if not stunned first in a calmer environment. Personally I would rather limit the practice so that the majority of the population who are non-participants of those faiths know that animals were killed humanely.
aka civilization? yeah, we have a bias to that
It’s also more bitter and tough from the adrenaline, a taste the East prefers, so you can’t even justify from a taste perspective.
They are pure scum these people that put animals through this type of abuse.,
Unfortunately, these backward peoples do not share our thoughts about cruelty to animals. They seem to gain some pleasure from maintaning the practice on the grounds that the man with a child bride said so. Obscene.
You forgot the part where he ordered his son to divorce so he could rape the wife. What Muslims call visions were literally just lucid dreams, it’s demonic to pass that off as religion.
Islam and Judaism, the kiddy rape religions.
High time the UK also banned these cruel practices. If a persons religion stops them from eating non-Halal meat they can become vegetarians
It’s laughable seeing Butchers trying to make Halal Slaughter look good
Ritual and Slaughter are two words that should never be combined in anything considered legal. It is illegal for very good reasons and there should be no exceptions.
They merely practiceon non-human animals.
With Kosher, we all know Jack the Ripper. That’s why he killed them by the neck, a tricky thing unless you’re a halal/kosher butcher. There are multiple tough layers of tissue. He ate Mary Kelly’s face.
Take a good, long, hard look. Should this ritualistic killing practice be legal in the First World?
And that guy tried the same thing on the non-jew mother of his child.
“ripping parts of her face off and draining her of all her blood in their Hollywood apartment”
same as Mary Kelly
An autopsy found she was tortured for eight agonising hours before she died from her injuries.
What does that look like?
Allow them to train in this and it’s probable they’ll use it on you once they have numbers.
From the recent murder:
Her skull was exposed after parts of her scalp and one ear were either cut or ripped away.
Or chewed off.
According to the Toronto Sun, Dr James Ribe of the Los Angeles County Coroner’s office said: “I have never seen this before.
“And I doubt hardly any forensic pathologists in this country or abroad have even seen this, outside of, perhaps, wartime … it’s extremely rare.
“[Her] entire scalp was traumatically absent and was not found, was not present with the body.”
The report shows there was also an injury to Kasian’s jaw that appeared to be human bite marks.
Those are similar to Kelly.
So this religious sacrifice stuff is not trivial.
comment from Express paper
One way to deal with it is to mark all food that is halal as such, and no meat prepared where ANY halal slaughter happens is marked as halal. Then we, the non barbaric people of the planet, can refuse to buy any halal meat and avoid all shops where halal is sold.
They want to deceive.
For example all NZ lamb is halal, ALL of it. But this is not marked. And if you ask any of the major supermarkets if they can guarantee that any particular cut of meat they produce is or is not halal they cannot guarantee this. Why? Because they are scared. Let us make them scared of going broke!
The law is already there. They need a legal case.
A fine point here
Imagine the debate if freedom of religion was extended to people following the Incas’ religion. Should the human victims be stunned before their hearts are ripped out?
Yeah, that’s the point. You’re training up executioners. Just in case a One World Religion were forced on us at any point.
Our supermarkets should be legally obliged to label meat which is halal/kosher so that as consumers we can make an informed view as to whether or not to buy it.
“Under the Consumer Rights Act, traders have certain obligations when they supply goods (including digital products) to a consumer. This basically means that your business has to comply with certain rules when you sell things to customers.
Under the legislation, the products you sell must:
be of a satisfactory quality
be fit for purpose
match the description
be installed correctly, if installation was part of the contract”
Implying non-Halal when it isn’t, is a violation. Deception by omission.
There are others but I can’t be bothered to go hunting when it’s obvious. Transparency is vital.
if they want this kind of slaughtered babaricly meat, go to your country of ancestry. too much of muslim and jewish ways are being forced on us.
The Jews made up Islam to weaponise against Christian Europe, study up.
The child rape exemption is a critical similarity. Oddly similar ages and everything.
Non-Muslims can’t have Halal, it’s idolatry and an animal sacrifice when Jesus was the last sacrifice. But Muslims can eat Kosher…. it’s the same religion. Atheists also have a right to abstain from these products, it’s basic consent.
“During the process, a Muslim will recite a dedication, know as tasmiya or shahada.”
“Tesco says the only difference between the halal meat it sells and other meat is that it was blessed as it was killed.”
“Blessed?” Are you serious? No wonder their company is tanking.
Ever since this came out, 2014, people are boycotting.
They’ve lost clean half their pricing.
“Stunning of livestock has been mandatory in the the EU since 1979, although member states can grant exemptions for religious slaughter.
Note: Member…. states… not nations. Sections of EU Empire.
Some countries, including Denmark, have opted to ban non-stunning slaughter altogether. The UK government says it has no intention of banning religious slaughter.”
How many Gov petitions can you ban? Can we reach Brexit Party for comment?
“Jewish law strictly forbids the use of stunning and meats are not blessed in the same way.
Unlike for halal, kashrut does not require God’s name to be said before every slaughter after an initial blessing.”
Not our God. Who is we?
“Currently, there is no requirement for halal or kosher meat to be specifically labelled.”
False, trades description act and various consumer protection laws as well as religious rights to decline consent (it’s idolatry to any other religion so Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist etc).
The laws are right there. You are neglecting the population and animal rights in refusing to enforce them. There’s a negligence here bordering on criminal “oversight”.
Slight detour but relevant. #######
Presumed consent with organs is also a violation. Will you care when they book your euthanasia appointment? The boat people need transplants, evil Anglo. You had an unlicensed opinion and the diversity board has voted to terminate you with extreme prejudice. Yet nobody is asking in the run-up to this election. A country of sheep led to slaughter.
“If passed, it is expected to come into effect in England in spring 2020 – because the timetable for its introduction will allow for a year of “transition” to the new law.”
“Under the new law, those who do not wish to donate their organs will still be able to opt out via the register and by using an NHS app that launches at the end of the year.”
Opt-outs make “errors” and bodies are raped anyway (yes, it’s organ rape, the forcible seizure or taking), found hollowed-out when checked. We won’t gut you, trust the app! What if they don’t have access to the app? Old phone, no phone? Even the Nazis didn’t do this shit.
“Currently, fewer than half of families give consent for their loved one’s organs to be donated if they are unaware of their wishes, and ministers hope that the new system will encourage people to make their wishes known before their death”
They’re going to over-ride the families with it.
“Under the new plans, specialist nurses will be on hand to discuss donation with families after a loved one dies.” Guilt-tripping the grief stricken, shame on them. And define “dies” because viable organs are still alive at the point they’re ripped out, it’s murder. So after it’s proclaimed dead but not biologically?
“We need to address myths and misconceptions around donation, and we will only do this by having informed debate and dialogue, which I hope will be fostered by these proposals.”
Are all NHS doctors obligated by oath to donate? No? Huh. Funny that. All politicians signing this in at least? Why won’t this register be public? It would reduce errors.
Consent to donate, comrade. We won’t kill you.Here, take a shiny cutesy death card and await treatment for twelve hours before we suspiciously put you/r loved one on a Death Care Pathway (still done).
What’s to stop ‘mistakes’ when they plant cards on people who didn’t want it? You can’t ask questions, the state owns your body. China is a human rights monster, remember?
“We must have a full, consistent public education system with faith groups, schools, colleges, universities, and with the public as well,” she said.
Revelations doesn’t apply to you if you’ve been butchered. I do wonder if the cannibals are planning on nicking a lot of this organ meat. I find it odd Jimmy Saville wanted to be left alone in NHS morgues with fresh human corpses.
We live in Hell, I’m 99% sure. Gaslighting kids to donate their organs when 3D printing exists but they’re too cheap to do it (despite a rejection rate of zero). Lord, please destroy socialism soon.
Consent to your destruction, all this says. If you think it isn’t related, including the Cannibalism for Global Warming initiative, you haven’t been paying attention.
“The HFA says many slaughterhouses will have chosen to move to halal processes so they do not lose Muslim customers.
The latest census suggests there are 2.7 million Muslims in the UK, with a spending power estimated in the region of £20bn.”
Latest was done almost ten years ago.
“Jewish and Muslim leaders agree, and have called for “comprehensive labelling” of meat.”
THEN WHY ISN’T THIS ACTED UPON. WE NEED COMMENT PRE-ELECTION.
Especially since this is EU related and we had Parliament petitions.
Abigail Ward, 16, who attends Gildredge House school in Eastbourne, East Sussex, was told by exam board OCR that she had made ‘obscene racial comments’ while answering her Religious Studies exam in June.
On the subject of halal butchers, the student had written, ‘…which I find absolutely disgusting.’
Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, the 36-year-old said the family were shocked by the decision to disqualify her daughter, and the exam board has since been overturned the decision.
Rat being tapped out of a halal animal like it’s normal. The conditions are disgusting and we’ve seen people filming in the places here, videos on the paper websites, with loud music terrifying the animals and what looks like shit everywhere because they were so terrified.
As far from clean as possible.
The prevalence of animals with bilateral false aneurysms was 7 and 8 percent for
Shechita and Halal slaughter, respectively, whereas no false aneurysms occurred during
bleeding in cattle that were electrically stunned and simultaneously developed a cardiac arrest. The authors concluded that combination of false aneurysms and collateral routes to the brain present a risk of sustained consciousness during religious slaughter in cattle.
….Velarde et al. (2003) showed that lambs that were hoisted and bled without being stunned, lost less blood from the sticking wound than lambs that were electrically stunned (250 V, 50 Hz,
3 s), hoisted and then stuck.
aka the more European way
The authors mentioned as a likely explanation that the muscle
contractions associated with electrical stunning forced blood away from skeletal muscles
towards the vessels in the thorax and abdomen.
And other proof of its inhumanity. 80 pages of it.
Aspiration of blood and refluxing gut content after the incision was considered a welfare concern after slaughter without stunning. Though this problem was mainly associated with the
inverted position, it occurred with the upright position for both Halal and Shechita slaughter (Gregory et al., 2009). The authors examined bovine respiratory tracts following Shechita and
Halal slaughter without stunning, and also in captive bolt stunned animals. During all the
treatments animals received the cut in the upright position. The study found blood lining the
inner aspect of the trachea in 19% of the Shechita, 58% of the Halal and 21% of the
stunned/cut cattle. Blood was found in the upper bronchi of 36% of Shechita, 69% of Halal
and 31% of stunned/cut cattle. Ten percent of the Shechita, 19% of the Halal and 0% of the stunned/cut cattle had fine bright red blood-tinged foam in the trachea. Blood covering the
larynx was recorded for all cattle. It was concluded that concerns about suffering from airway irritation by blood could apply in animals that are either not stunned before slaughter or do not lose consciousness rapidly whilst blood is present in the respiratory tract (Gregory et al.,
2009). These concerns are based on the fact that fluid in the respiratory tract in conscious
animals leads to irritation of sensory receptors lining the airway, and in particular the
receptors on the glottis and the carina of the trachea. In animals with intact vagus nerves there
could have been a cough or expulsion reflex, but coughing would be absent when the vagi had
been severed (Canning, 2007) though lower airway irritation may still occur through
sympathetic-spinal afferent pathways (Quin et al., 2007).
Again animals are put into these restrainers by hand and the head is supported
by hand during and after the cut. Sheep have been observed shackled by one leg (Catanese et
al., 2009; Cenci Goga et al., 2009) before sticking for Kosher slaughter (up to 17 kg
liveweight, line speed exceeded 200 sheep/ h) and for Halal slaughter (sheep up to 55 kg
liveweight, line speed could exceed 150 sheep/ h). Shackling time averages ranged between 1 and 4 minutes before performance of the cut, but can reach 5 minutes if the time was needed to sharpen the knife or if the operator had to approach first to perform the cut. During
shackling before sticking some sheep hung calmly whereas others struggled. Struggling was
increased if a sheep touched another struggling sheep. Sheep reactions also included turning the head to the side and apparently looking around, kicking with the hind leg and vigorous struggling including movements of the whole body. In the last case, the movements were thought to be escape behaviour. Struggling and vocalisation sometimes occurred in response to the cut.
Vocalising in sheep sound like a child screaming MAAAAA for its mother, it’s eerie and almost human.
Keep eating halal and telling yourself it’s okay.
The whole paper is kinda like that. The animals beg to be let go, that’s probably why they like it.
Other methods are to place the bird in a cone before performing the cut or placing the birds in lateral
recumbency for Halal slaughter. According to Dialrel experience, restraining poultry for
Shechita was performed manually or by shackling chickens and turkeys before cutting,
although the latter was not according to kosher rules. During shackling chickens could hang
calmly or show wing flapping which in some cases was vigorous and long lasting.
Less suffering huh?
Including Halal Tufano. Don’t buy from him, he doesn’t even put it on his FAQs.
“The lack of honesty and accountability in the current market for naturally raised animal products has driven me to provide people a product they can find their true health with.”
“We will be sourcing meat from farmers raising animals for us to these quality standards.”
Highest quality Halal cuckery. You have to write to him before he’ll admit it, which is illegal.
“Halal signage be displayed where an establishment sells both halal and non-halal products”
As is that. He doesn’t label and it’s meant to be per product like with allergies.
Trust no cuck, [bonus gifs at end] you actually have to seek this out even from people who pretend not to be snowflakes. It’s sad I know this legal side and Americans don’t… or pretend not to. No document disclosure either.
NEW YORK “All food items must also have a halal label affixed to them when they are packaged and being sold as such”
You know they have to hire Muslims to do it too right?
“Slaughter by a Muslim”
So they’re isolating the food industry from Westerners.
When sheep are group stunned in a pen, they may hide their heads under animals which makes it difficult to correctly place the electrodes.
The average number of cuts as reported by Gregory et al. (2008) was 3.2 cuts during Shechita and 5.2 cuts during Halal slaughter of cattle.
The one cut propaganda is a LIE.
In sheep, according to the experience of the Dialrel WP2 members, the minimum number of cuts required to sever the major blood vessels of the neck for Halal (without stunning) and kosher slaughter ranged from 1 to 6. For cattle
either one or up to 60 sweeps of knife have been found.
Up to 60.
Religion of cruelty.
For poultry usually one cut was
performed. Additionally to multiple cuts, after withdrawing the knife from the wound, additional cuts were sometimes performed during Kosher and Halal slaughter. Each time the
knife touches the surface of the wound the potential exists for further nociceptor activation.
Even if the knife blade is twice as long as the width of the throat, there are limitations to cut the neck of large cattle with a small number of cuts. This is due to the fact that according to
the area to be cut the length of the blade increases disproportionately depending on the
pressure that can be applied by the operator (Adams and Sheridan, 2008).
Especially in sheep but also in cattle an additional aspect may be thick wool or coat, which
may have to be parted before the cut. Otherwise this would constrain the blade during cutting
and could cause blunting of the blade. Blunt blades are especially welfare relevant if the neck
is not sufficiently stretched to fixate the flexible skin around the neck of sheep or cattle
(Wenzlawowicz and Holleben, 2007).
As for the painless lie, will you settle for EEG?
Measurement of the electrical activity of the brain to assess noxious stimuli has been described in chapter 2.6.2. Recent advancements in electrophysiology have allowed quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in response to painful/noxious sensory input, allowing the experience of pain to be more precisely assessed in humans and animals. This methodology has been applied to the question of pain during slaughter of calves by ventral-neck incision. In a series of experiments the results showed clear evidence for the first time that the act of slaughter by ventral-neck incision is associated with noxious stimulation that would be expected to be perceived as painful in the period between the incision and loss of consciousness (Mellor et al., 2009). First the use of changes in the EEG
power spectral and a minimal anaesthesia model was validated for the assessment of noxious
sensory input using amputation dehorning as a noxous stimulus (Gibson et al., 2007). Then
the model was used to investigate the impact of ventral-neck incision without prior stunning (Gibson et al., 2009b). The results demonstrated that ventral neck incision produced changes
in the EEG indicating that it was a noxious stimulus and therefore could be perceived as painful in conscious animals. This was then confirmed in the second study addressing the
question whether the EEG responses after ventral neck incision were due primarily to the
cutting of neck tissues or to interruption of blood flow to and from the brain. The results demonstrated that the predominant noxious stimulus was cause by the transection of neck tissue not the loss of blood flow to and from the brain (Gibson et al., 2009a). In sheep there is
no direct EEG data that demonstrates pain in response to the cut, however based on the physiological similarities between sheep and cattle, it stands to reason that the neck cut in non stunned sheep will cause pain (Hemsworth et al., 2009).
The animal cruelty people are right on this one. This is why we fully stun.
Nerves severed during the neck cut have been described by Gregory (2004, page 96) to be able to proceed signals for up to 4 seconds.
A lifetime in neuroscience. The time dilation of the stress alone would make it seem like five minutes.
Direct activation of neurones during transection of
the nerve results in an intense but brief injury discharge in the afferent nerves. The overall
effect is likely to be a sense of shock, comparable to an electric shock.
Uhuh…. convenient metaphor.
Subsequently, undamaged nerve endings and also nociceptors in the neck wound respond if stimulated or disturbed especially from cold drafts and mechanical effects depending on the way the wound is managed before consciousness will be lost (Gregory, 2005b; Gregory, 2004). Nerve
conduction velocities ensure that activation of brain centres following major cutting injury occurs within milliseconds. Therefore, the potential experience of pain is directly relevant to
the events following the neck cut (Hemsworth et al., 2009).
During the Dialrel spot visits even under apparently optimum conditions, reactions to the cut as vocalising or exhaling (as long as the trachea was intact), retracting movements, struggling or shivering have been found especially in cattle during Halal and Shechita slaughter without stunning in both turning pens and upright systems. Reactions in sheep have been observed as
struggling directly after the cut but also shivering. Reactions of poultry have been retraction movements and wing flapping.
You can’t pretend it’s better.
In conclusion it can be stated with the utmost probability that animals feel pain during the throat cut without prior stunning. Whereas the actual cut itself can only be evaluated using behavioural signs, questions remain about standardisation of cutting techniques. Because in all probability animals are able to experience pain during and after the cut, the question of duration of consciousness is very important. This applies as well for a smooth cut performed
by a skilled operator.
Cut, singular? Up to sixty!
Risk factors for increased pain include increased number of changes of direction of the cut, increased number of cuts, wound manipulation (e.g. second cut), insufficient length of the blade, increased cutting time, a blunt blade, nicks on the blade, increased diameter of the neck, increased flexibility of the skin due to insufficient tension of the neck tissue during the cut, thick wool or coat and excitable animals.
Is there such a thing as a non-excitable animal?
Section 4.1.2 goes into loss of consciousness.
It is also possible that animals regain consciousness during bleeding (see chapter 2.8 and also below). The duration of overall consciousness is of particular importance
I’ll stop here, you get the gist.
I’m too disgusted.
some bonus Halal Tufano GIFs/vids, I have the video footage but can’t upload it here on this site.
“happy”? lying or deceiving?
Halal is also cheaper to produce because it’s so inhumane and has fewer equipment requirements.
I know film people and they send me videos, GIFs and stuff. The irony of those two clips together with the same Old Hollywood aspect ratio was amazing.
Edit: They told me about this …thing and uploaded it for me, pasting links, hope this works. We pass around videos like this all the time and have a right good laugh about it so ignore the count. That was us before this post went live. He is Halal Tufano now.
You could probably edit some hideously gory Halal thing between these clips but I’ll spare you,
Shills, shills everywhere.
They also recently sent me this. If it looks like something Hollywood would produce, that’s because it is.
Why are all cults, rape cults, masquerading as polygamy? The German church with the cages to this day?
Remember as you read about the sudden urgency in the history of the human species for correctional sex re-education.
I am going to explain the root of all PC (ambitious) and the purpose of Sex Ed re pedophiles.
I have gleaned this from teachers.
“And PC reacts against The Truth. Truth is to be subordinated to the goal of subversion. Unwanted Truths are Hate Facts. Universally known Truths are replaced with narrow scraps of bureaucratically defined principles; spontaneous and obvious knowledge is contested, undermined, broken-up and contradicted one fragment at a time and replaced with Professional Consensus (Peer Review).”
I defy the Politically Correct Cult’s value judgments. I deny them and live in opposition to them.
This is rare. There are also efforts to learn their tactics and dig up what they really are. The process of sexualising children into endorsing their own rape (and, later, forming a ‘trauma bond’ they can easily gaslight as ‘love’) is the goal of pedophilia, both legally and literally. The corruption of the innocent was always a crime dating back to ancient times as a treasonous attack on everything society had developed and swore to protect. It also happened to be most important in the sexual realm but modern politics weirdly only recognises the political.
I thought the personal was political?
Can’t get more personal than intimate. Why was it ever the state’s affair what you did with various holes?
Celebrate or shame, that’s a moral claim from ‘postmodernists’ and a porous church/state boundary.
Kids already figure out p>v.
What you need to teach them is all the depraved stuff it wouldn’t occur to most adults to even TRY.
As Bandura taught us, kids don’t imitate any harmful instruction given by an authority figure with a duty of care based on trust.
Child rape hasn’t skyrocketed since they included instructions on it for ‘safety’.
An under-developed body isn’t more prone to injury and disease…. /s
Darwin is never taught in classes ostensibly about reproduction…. any purpose beyond sexual narcissism is banned.
They won’t call a boyfriend a lover but they’ll tell you it’s practically compulsory, expected you shop around and refine your prostitution skills with a stream of them. No alternatives. Being used up like a cum rag is ‘fun’.
No statistical consequences, whither informed consent?
Shame the virgins because freedom and empowerment.
Straight men valued by how homosexual they behave, sexually. A soulless hedonic treadmill of superficiality, numbers and filthy stories of infection for the entertainment of people who hate you.
They won’t tell you how the Pill works (chemical abortifacient for couples fucking*) but they’ll tell you how great it is. Be a happy cum sponge because the Patriarchy is flattering you by wanting to fuck you and nothing else, ever. Being a hole that is a goal is your life’s goal.
False consciousness is at play.
“Let’s punish Patriarchy by being its whore” is the general gist.
According to Piaget’s work, prior to puberty children are biologically incapable of abstract thought. This is why nothing is real to them except Santa. They live in a fantasy of equally valid ideas, having no experience or brainpower to question it. This includes criticism or safety concerns.
Naturally, in all their discussions of celebrating feelings, sexual disgust is banned.
No means no but you aren’t allowed to find someone ugly, physically and especially morally.
Wait, isn’t that the primary reason for No? Attraction just ain’t there?
That conveniently limits the options to deny them as social excuse, dunnit?
Attraction is from ‘animal magnetism’. Sexual attraction you’ve heard of, the inverse you haven’t.
Complete coincidence, huh?
“Sex Ed” makes sense only as AA for the horny and sexually repulsive. The unfit.
Moral repulsion must be extinguished as ‘hate’. It resembles independent thought.
Can’t have cultural standards creeping up on the degenerates, can we?
Can’t have women striking from the likes of Tindr and clubbing.
Selection pressures are the Devil, Hitler.
Sexual selection is oppression.
Explaining random -isms and tidbits of their fevered wet dreams.
Down with Western Civ
Er …. why?
What did Western Civ have, that none of the others have?
That normies, powerless normies who aren’t running banks or launching IPOs, would care about?
That young soy men would especially care about?
Sexual selection, freedom of choice. Sexual discretion.
It’s like Neo-Freudianism. Everything is about sex, all of politics is now rebranded as hate crime if you’re not doing the Devil’s tango with a fat borderline tranny. A multicultural orgy of “acceptance” because who has lower standards than a Third Worlder accustomed to drinking their own shit? Sex slaves deported if they don’t comply, EE women…
This keeps the weak men in line with dopamine hits, pacified from political rebellion so it is required weaker-willed women are caught early in childhood, at their most docile.
The personal is NOT political, telling people how to use their bodies is tyranny.
No borders, no escape. Everything they do makes sense, suddenly.
When did Sex Ed become suddenly vital to the re-education of children?
Around the time Darwin was writing about the quality barriers to existence.
Minus the gaslighting efforts, the cream of the genetic crop would marry out of the dating scene and never give the creepy losers who want to rape them ‘a chance’.
Chance? This isn’t equality. It’s sanity. Ambiguity makes everyone think they’re desperate.
Why are there more pedo teachers than ever before? Boundary formation.
Personal boundary testing.
[If a person wants to fuck you, knowing you don’t want them, that’s a rapist. Consent is not complex. Assume no and move on.]
Follow the slutty model, girls, the role model.
White guilt, white models.
Why is James Bond white? How are those kid’s films?
Kids who believe Brave New World style that their body belongs to anyone who gives them the insult of cheap attention (lechery) will never lead to adults with a healthy sense of self-ownership, dignity and property rights, sworn enemy of the Cultural Marxist.
Instead they’ll eat their feelings and medicate with a void where identity and pride should be. The repressed repulsion will become anti-natal, morphing into a bizarre desire for sex but a disgust for babies.
Disgust for the degenerate becomes disgust for their body’s reproductive function and the truly innocent.
Babymaking, the conceptual association divorced of ‘pleasure’, stripped of excuses, triggers deep feelings of shame and loathing, for reasons too long repressed to explain.
It’s an easy link to test: more sexual partners versus disgust at the thought of parenthood.
If you want to trigger leftists, including the hidden ones, tell them sexual repulsion is a human right.
Any meme effort that cuts this Gordian knot instantly exposes and kills their grassroots support.
Sexual orientation isn’t a choice now, is it? Like how being male and female never used to be a choice.
See, the ‘sexuality is a choice’ stage is actually the next one. Asexuals, just try it ‘fluidity’, female Viagra, the Pill already made women (and male users/beneficiaries) less choosy, more unnatural, biologically.
If old men didn’t have access to Viagra, what would they do with their time?
If young men didn’t assume all young women were on the Pill, who would they flirt with?
MOTHER Nature has limits for good reason. Masturbation with another person is postmodern freakishness.
This repulsion line cuts off both Hydra heads, forever. It exposes the true ‘rape culture’.
Why did the SJW and Muslim rowing on national TV seem like allies?
Like predators fighting over a still-dying piece of flesh?
Trying to discredit sexual repulsion as an impulse of evolutionary protection. Libertarians should be outraged. Your right to say NO.
Suddenly all the tradthots and cuckservatives think if you don’t want a particular race, you’re genociding them.
*Alabama hasn’t outlawed all abortion because the Pill is still dispensed to the ‘sexually active’. Because rape babies are fine but their hooker ‘mistress’ could tell the wife.
“Illusory truth effect” wasn’t invented by (((academics))). “The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”
Oh, the irony of Nazi propaganda whitewashed for socialism.
And used to call others Nazis.
For Hitler’s Big Lie, no less.
“The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”.
Crediting people in academia is important.
“According to Hitler, the “big lie” was a propaganda technique typically used by Jewish Marxists.”
Patently false, they say.
Where have they done that?
This is why you can show PC people all sorts of factual evidence to the contrary and they’re still thick, it really is like a cult. State ‘education’ cult. How many years do you need? One day historians will show all the PC adverts in our media like we see Soviet stuff now.
[They’re scared to show us most Nazi propaganda because they’ve ripped it off again for the present.]
Actually, a propaganda MOOC about modern PC propaganda would be amazing.
This is why slander’s illegal, by the way. On an individual level, repetition for gossip does damage.
The way to actually get the brainwashed to snap out of it is allow questions, increase dissonance and apply consequences for being deluded.
He also sells the book through official channels, which would be nice to buy if you like the material.
It’s also easier to read than this free version.
Contents page for a taste;
Contents (of paper version)
Why I use the term Political Correctness, instead of Liberalism or Socialism? …………………………………………………………………………i
Political correctness no longer a joke… ………………………………… 1
Escape from habituation into nihilism …………………………………… 2 The irrationality of PC ……………………………………………………….. 7 Imaginary enemies preferred……………………………………………….. 9 Why is PC so shallow, flippant and reckless? ……………………….. 12
Political correctness, the intellectual elite and the mass media …. 15 The mass media and the memory hole …………………………………. 17
Fashion and PC ………………………………………………………………. 20 Old Left – New Left ………………………………………………………… 22
Nature of modern mass media ……………………………………………. 25 Mass media as social cognition ………………………………………….. 28 The immunity of PC to reason …………………………………………… 29 PC depends on both the mass media and an intellectual elite …… 31
The impossibility of neutrality …………………………………………… 32
The proper question – whom to favour? ………………………………. 35
Assuming neutrality is impossible ………………………………………. 37
Good causes and good intentions ……………………………………….. 39
The moral exemplar of PC ethics ……………………………………….. 41 Is anybody safe? ……………………………………………………………… 43
Safety for victim group members ……………………………………….. 46 Life as a supervised game …………………………………………………. 47
What matters most – PC or societal function? ………………………. 49
Virtue in political correctness = altruism, un-selfishness…………. 52
Disinterested altruism and moral superiority ………………………… 56
The insanity of pure abstract altruism………………………………….. 59 Immune to evidence ………………………………………………………… 61
Indifference to outcomes ………………………………………………….. 63 Takeover by the PC elite – ten summary points …………………….. 65
Not fundamentally egalitarian, after all ……………………………….. 70
The definition of happiness under PC………………………………….. 73
The Principle of Inversion ………………………………………………… 74 PC Utopia ……………………………………………………………………… 76 Atomic individuals, atomic acts …………………………………………. 77
All groups seen as interest groups ………………………………………. 78 PC-favoured groups are assumed to be weak and controllable …. 80 PC not fundamentally „multicultural‟ ………………………………….. 82
Orthodox religion is immune to PC incentives ……………………… 84 PC as a Christian heresy …………………………………………………… 86 Western civilization cannot be saved…………………………………… 89
The millennium-deep roots of political correctness ………………… 91
Could resurgent nationalism save Western civilization from PC? 94 Characteristics of a new secular nationalism ………………………… 99
Could a party of „common sense‟ replace political correctness? 103
CS v PC ………………………………………………………………………. 105
What is The Good? ………………………………………………………… 109 Political Correctness is purposefully subversive of The Good … 114
The Good versus The Better ……………………………………………. 117
Can the desire to end suffering be the primary motivation? ……. 119
The world is not enough …………………………………………………. 122
Can‟t we simply subtract PC from modernity? ……………………. 124 PC and „original sin‟ ………………………………………………………. 126
Faith in abstract systems …………………………………………………. 128 Why don‟t you convert to political correctness? ………………….. 131
How to be non-PC …………………………………………………………. 134
Postscript …………………………………………………………………….. 136
Note to the reader ………………………………………………………….. 137
I bolded the recently-relevant topics, he isn’t called paranoid now!
Oh, but this well-researched, well-written book was published before SJWAL and the guy’s actually white and really academic, with a history of contribution in academia, so don’t be surprised you somehow never heard of it among the so-called red pill / woke / alternative / whatever internet that totally isn’t controlled opposition.
I’m sure they just forgot to mention it at the apropos moments for half a decade.
As it was all coming to fruition.
This book is intended for normal, mainstream, secular, modern, disaffected and alienated intellectuals; those who are complicit in political correctness (as are all intellectuals) but who are (when not distracted, drugged or dreaming) in a state of despair.
This book will, I hope, help such people to understand their condition, and present the likely choices. It will not help them to save their world (too late for that) but it may help them to save their souls.
I’m sure they just “forgot”.
You cannot understand the nature of the Beast without this book, it truly is fundamental.
Tagging as QAnon because it explains social media censorship.
A point about the Conservative cucks who want to keep the Sexual Revolution (so recent it’s in living memory).
People can only get away with this absurd claim to be defending Western Civilization (get away with it in their own minds, as much as the public arena) because Western Civilization is so obviously collapsing so fast and the perception that what will come after is probably going to be miserable for most people; and because this degeneration is being accelerated by an evil, blind and insane politically correct elite who apparently must be opposed – somehow – although with little chance of short-term success.
Blind? No, they have a giant eye.
Never attribute to stupidity what has a centuries-long trail of proof leading to malice.
What else are we supposed to believe? Year on year, it coincidentally went their way?
Trump’s victory triggers the brainwashed because in Hollywood, only the good win. If they win, they must be the good guys.
But the Secular Right is trying to keep its cake and to eat it: to retain the residual and declining bits of modernity, the counter-currents that it personally values (especially sexual freedom); but at the same time to dispense with PC – and PC is now the mainstream and dominant flow of modernity.
To kill PC in all its sprouting Hydra heads, you’d need to kill the body of what it protects.
Bye bye sexual “freedom” as the price of civility.
If you want civilization, the decadence has gotta die.
Austerity was previously Labour’s policy for a reason.
I’d like to thank Planned Parenthood for Trump’s November victory. Without their tireless work to murder leftists, this push-back wouldn’t be possible. Abortion has replaced pandemic as a culling force in human populations.
Logically the insane degenerates deluded enough to feel entitled to both a virgin and a whore (and therefore, terrible marriages as they romance the mistress and deprive the wife with emotional abandonment) would immediately cause a severe shortage of women a la India, to say nothing of the women who’d reject the system and swear off men entirely. This is why the desires of weak-willed men don’t determine history or society, they can only destroy.
100% – 20% religious, spinster, 40% virgin probable child bride, 40% whore or if they wanted more variety, using up the best women thus 70% whore, 30% bride and slaughtering women who rejected the slavery of forced unions.How quickly before the birth rate turns into an Indian sinkhole, like all the savage groups who did this in history before?
And they try to appeal to Darwin about this? Or moral superiority? What about all the abortions required by that system?
Kindly, there’d be at least a 25% shortage of women. What happens to the men? You can’t draft them, they won’t go or they’ll rebel or be useless. Now you’re overthrown by the shit-tier of your own sex. Like India.
AKA the guys who think they’d be better off in that society, not of the shit-tier themselves, aren’t smart either.
1 man for 1 woman is the best system and natural to this species.
As it is, a mutated flu of some sort would shortly dispatch most sluts, whatever their claimed politics, in the world. It doesn’t have to be purely an STD to be transmitted through close physical proximity (although it could combine with HPV’s genes). I don’t worry about them. They’re dead men walking. And contributing to the very drug resistance that might’ve saved them. The Lord does work in mysterious ways.
They should study spiral of silence on social media and classist attitudes to the poor in “caring” Democrats.
We’ve lost a sense of dignity in society and the idea of the inappropriate. Some etiquette must come back e.g, talking about your sex life is repugnant, people don’t want to know, much like bowel functions. Bragging about bodily functions is the lowest of the low. It’s subhuman when the only thing you can talk about is animal impulses. Politics is disgusting normal people.
When you normalize conversations and pre-watershed depictions of degeneracy, it will get worse. Look at “music”, it’s basically an audio book of porn now. Bring back the film and TV code, please. It isn’t censorship because people can seek it out online. Society must have standards.
Why are there no age restrictions on products e.g. porn and smartphones? There’s a wealth of evidence of addiction.
“White also had previous convictions for indecent assault, indecent exposure and gross indecency involving children, animal cruelty and dishonesty.
do we have police or what?
Prosecutor Chris Dunn described White as an “alleged transgender female” who has used her “transgender persona to put herself in contact with vulnerable persons” whom she could then abuse.
plotting legal defence
“The prosecution say that because there is smattering of evidence in this case that the defendants approach to transition has been less than committed,” he added.
Sentencing White to a minimum of eight years-and-a-half years in prison, the judge, Christopher Batty, said: “You are a predator and highly manipulative and in my view you are a danger. You represent a significant risk of serious harm to children, to women and to the general public.””
Should’ve been an asylum, like the other psychopaths.
Why not hanging? If someone’s a danger like that, why not?
Put sexual sadism in the DSM already.
Among the most violent of prisoners, including rapists, cross-dressing and fetishism represent a top hobby.
Explains why they screech in excitement or sob with crocodile tears about everything demographic. It’s just vote-rigging. Bringing in fake voters (not actually with any birthright to decide the outgroup’s infrastructure and historical matters*) is comparable to a false military (terrorists, importing terrorists is also treason) since it’s the two ways to gain power – the status (political positions, MP, PM, POTUS, AG) and the might (enforcement with force -or else- and violence and little considered but critical intimidation i.e. common example, Western girls scared to wear more feminine AND Western clothing in multicultural areas, who has the balls to do that study?). [has to be both for clear signal value]
Political correctness is the tyranny of cultural intimidation.
*e.g. if they wouldn’t go to the draft, they have no opinion on the draft or the possibility of war. They’d be forced though. Playing victim doesn’t mean acting like an hysterical woman come draft time would work. I’d go to any version of the draft I’d be physically capable of so weak men have no excuse. I heard it described thusly: Do you wait for them to stab you warm in your bed hiding under a blanket or meet death like a man? ‘Like a man’ there referring to physical courage, what modern men sorely lack as they ‘work on’ abs and chest waxes and spray tans. The Hysterical Left can’t expect to always get rescued by the Honourable Loser Right. Actually, a smart general puts the weaker men on the front line knowing they’re A useless (I’d like to see a study on male health status markers for military purposes and IQ**) and B will get picked off anyway… this isn’t mean, and actually less sexist, since it’s good for the war effort*** and the overall fitness of Men as a category. If you spare the feeble men like prize inbred birds in a climate controlled room, as in WW1, you… should look up all the stupid socialist bullshit that got in shortly thereafter. Weak men make weak voting decisions. The best men died on the field, literally. Older and smaller wars, prior to the World ones, were highly eugenic for the male genome and the nomination system of medals for valour etc. reflect this incentive structure. They don’t hand out medals for a good pregnancy because surviving that condition is very random, no precise behaviours really change the outcome and it can have nothing to do with fitness e.g. sepsis****. Military medals handed out all the time make no sense, that’s the arrogance, and medals for mothers only make sense for a high number AND quality of children. We give children (pre-teen and under) medals when logically it should go to the family and strengthen that unit.
**This study is interesting and verging closer but I’ll add it separately.
***A statistic is quantitative whereas the genome is qualitative. If you had a binary choice between your country losing an inferior quality specimen (we are animals) and a far, far better one of its kind, who would you rather help with the rebuilding effort after the war? It’s like weeding a garden, this is so obvious.
****The future is bound to suck with antibiotic resistance AND escalating non-European population, there will be a pandemic. At some point. Mathematical inevitability.
The politicians don’t want the immigrants to know: A passport is a license to draft.
That’s literally what it is, legally, what it’s always been and why they became a big deal in WW2. In the event of a war while abroad, you could be identified with your country of military subscription. I’d love to see a Freedom of Information request on this, what a passport legally enshrines as a duty to the holder. It’s an international symbol of citizenship so burning it won’t make a bit of difference, you agreed and signed over XYZ. Why else would you sign your own passport? You must ensure the person crossing your border is signed on as a friend/ally and not a current enemy (military invasion). Why do passport inspectors ask why you’re there, for legal reasons?
Argh! I give up explaining this point.
The census is about food security, part of national security. Older ones were all about farms.
Back to voter dilution related “problems.”
It’s insane we have foreign nationals who think a passport is something they’ll never need to repay.It isn’t like a blank cheque, the hand-rubbing politicians see you as currency, you as a person. It’s a legal document binding you to the fate of a country, including its national debt, so to ruin that country or prefer your real “home” in policy decisions won’t actually work out for them? Just saying.
Sinking a ship you’re on and celebrating because you hated the captain.
If I’m a bitch, my name is foresight.
It’s a trifecta of stupidity. Citizenship is a noose, and you want dual?
[Actually, why don’t dual citizens pay twice the taxes? No, that would be fair, wouldn’t it? Can’t have that. ‘Fair’ is racist. nb Logically, they get twice the citizenry benefits and effectively pay half the tax for same. The politicians sell pig-shit thick celebrities on dual citizenships by appealing to their ego, which tells you everything you need to know.]
Pissing off the people who helped you (1) with a more advanced military (2) and higher native IQ (3)?
I foresee this ending well… how will we go after them for their share of the debts?
[inc. odious debt, hours of fun on that one]
Libertarians are stupid because they assume immigrants have common sense and act in their own and their home’s best interests. Haha no.
And the people who think being nice to the outgroup means that group will treat them any better or more stupidly, make them leader of the foreigners?! (See Labour leader contention for that last, no they won’t accept a foreign leader either. If Labour wants to be the ethnic party, it cannot have a white leader any more).
You know the show about dragons. That’s more plausible. This would never happen.
They’d rape her to death in about a day. This is medically possible.
No, your skin is your uniform whether you accept it or not, if you research their cultural psychology, even within the group itself they have caste systems. Multiple. And whitey is on the bottom of that scale too. History doesn’t change because you smiled at someone.
WW1 was the photo war, WW2 was the film. What’s the medium of WW3, memes?