Hormonal pollution affects fertility, DNA

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180629114711.htm

And it’s genetically heritable.

Coming off meds really isn’t a thing.

A lot of regretful former transsexuals will get a shock.

Nope, you can’t go back again. The body remembers.

Congratulations. You got one body and you ruined it with Frankenscience.

I would expect in a lot of post-op, post-ops, to see (if they have children) a greater risk of child cancer and genetic disease. Sexual reproduction in this species does not like competing variables like a man with chemically female signals. The organism is biologically unstable. What’s the old word? Oh yes, aberration. It is an aberration. Oldest word would be abomination.

Anyone supplementing hormones without genuine need (no, men, you don’t need fake T) is coding their DNA to be polluted. Pollution effects are naturally worst in the old (longest exposure)…. who happen to be all about magic pills.

Vanity is evil. Perverting nature causes pain.

Technically the right-wing should be all over green issues with pollution since it’s intimately connected with family and health.

Male infertility drug in the air

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-02/demographic-dysphoria-looms-scientists-discover-sulfur-dioxide-lowers-sperm-count

An accident, I’m sure.

Economic boom follows fertility boom.

Economic collapse follows demographic collapse.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/06/12/data-drive-iq-immigrants-and-economy-prosperity/

Missing factor is IQ.

You want young people to breed?

  1. stop punching down at the young.
  2. Incentivise young people to marry.

Then they’ll breed. They don’t marry? They shouldn’t breed!

http://parenthood.library.wisc.edu/Popenoe/Popenoe-Married.html

Otherwise the kids are shit-tier. All the child psych research agrees for once.

This is very basic Civilization 101 stuff.

Pollution is dysgenic. Outsourcing national labour is too. Right-wingers have more cause to care. Less kids? Well, they say, we need more immigrants, because humans are interchangeable cogs under the globalism of supranationalism! God forbid they make less of a profit for a while, after taking on a business risk!

See, globalism is actually just code for slave labour and national betrayal.

Also imperative: stop the rent generation and tax the fat wankers playing real life Monopoly, punish carcinogenic food producers and teach children with rote rather than pretending school isn’t a job.
Why do we pay for prisoners to get free housing, food etc? Where’s the vote on the death penalty? We never had a referendum, especially on traitors. Guy Fawkes was hanged for attacking Parliament and he was white.

People age at variable speeds (biological age)

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/07/01/1506264112

Antiaging interventions are needed to reduce the burden of disease and protect population productivity.

Translation: they want to work you like a dog until you die.

Young people are the most attractive targets for therapies to extend healthspan

How is that NOT eugenics? You can bet it would be enforced.
Covered here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-33409604

…The analysis showed that at the age of 38, the people’s biological ages ranged from the late-20s to those who were nearly 60.

Pretty huge variance.

“They look rough, they look lacking in vitality,” said Prof Terrie Moffitt from Duke University in the US.

The study said some people had almost stopped ageing during the period of the study, while others were gaining nearly three years of biological age for every twelve months that passed….

Wouldn’t it make more empirical sense to study the verifiable Dorian Grays of the group?
Could this be genetic load?
Epigenetics with environment?

Taken with other studies, such as caloric restriction, might the body have an optimum stressor rate, beyond which it begins to break down? What could affect this? Processed food, particulate matter (air pollution), toxins processed or physical exertions?

“Any area of life where we currently use chronological age is faulty, if we knew more about biological age we could be more fair and egalitarian.”

I don’t see how. Unless you shoot people for being too young.

She argued the retirement age may be unfair for those “working at their peak” who then had to retire.

Oh, the government wants another excuse not to pay your pension. Fantastic.
It’s also ironic I was writing today about how men have a Wall too. Deny this. We’ve all seen people from school who were late bloomers, as well as people who peaked at age 15.