Children watching necrophilia porn?

Don’t punish the child, producers, platforms or parents?

Baby them!

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/706855/porn-addiction-clinic-physical-dependency-london-harley-street

“A school counsellor and a group of parents came to me because what they found on a child’s phone wasn’t even regular sex. We’re talking necrophilia and bestiality. It had already gone that far.

Believe me now?

Part of the grooming process of pedos is to show them explicit material: sex, violence and animal cruelty.

It shuts down the brain from trauma.

Supernormal stimulus, ban it without a credit card.

Porn ruins marriages

It ruins your pair bond. Accept it and forgo use (you shouldn’t need medically and do not need psychologically) or don’t complain when you’re a bitter divorcee. A crack addiction is less harmful to marriages than a porn one because crack addicts admit they have a problem and society (including marriage counselors!) doesn’t tell them it’s good for them! A marriage is literally a pair bond enforced with sexual monogamy, there is nothing else. That is what the religious vow and the law bind. They bind the two individuals before there is a bond between them and the marriage is the bond’s maintenance.

It’s considered the man’s duty to keep a marriage good because they are the ones sexually performing. If they cannot perform and maintain the bond, if they are impotent, what marriage is there exactly? This was the Catholic Church’s position!

How does porn ruin marriage? [I hate these posts, might stop doing them.]

https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4081&context=etd

It’s unnatural.

Porn user = Incompetent husband. (I’d say the same thing about an addicted wife). You should be working out any kind of sexual energy on the spouse, that’s their role. At least, masturbate in private and not directing those vital energies outside the marital bed.

The male typical skills valued in the marriage are lost.

“her male partner’s low engagement, responsiveness, and accessibility in their relationship was predicted by his pornography use”

Insecure attachment predicts divorce, it can literally simulate a damaged childhood.

https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/committed-relationship-youre-wired-for-it

The vital point is that our pair bonding penchant arises from physiological events, not mere social conditioning. It evolved from the infant-caregiver mechanism, and the two mechanisms still overlap in the brain’s reward circuitry. So, even though many Westerners appear to be caught up in a chaotic hook-up culture for the moment, it doesn’t mean that we humans are, by nature, as promiscuous as bonobo chimps or that pair-bonding inclinations are superficial cultural constructs.”

The Sexual Revolution was a lie and water is wet.

“In short, if you are hooking up with multiple partners purely for recreation you could be an outlier. Your behavior is not typical human behavior—a point that is easily overlooked by Western researchers.”

Low historical rates of cuckoldry in Western European genetic ancestry
https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/comment/3650#comment-3650

Suck it, most men and women are NOT cheats and neither were their ancestors.

Honour culture wasn’t a farce.

https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2275&context=etd

It’s an addiction, a valid reason to terminate a marriage, Biblical adultery aside.
The heart of all addictions is selfishness.

“Online sexual activities, including pornography use, have drastically increased in recent
years. Many studies have examined the impact that pornography use can have on marriages and
families. One of the key findings has been that pornography use can negatively impact trust in
relationships. This study focused on understanding the mechanisms involved when a husband’s
pornography use negatively impacts his marital relationship and his wife’s emotional well-being

That’s called emotional abuse.

The selfishness of addiction is such that they will always expect it to go one way. Of course, when you’re married you are no longer an individual and this is why selfishness becomes the worst possible sin. What you take for yourself, you take from your spouse.

A taste of their own medicine may be warranted, since that’s the one way the stupider men can learn if all else fails.

If the woman wants to teach him what it’s like, just flirt with any man more attractive than him when he’s around and tell him it isn’t your fault, it’s evolution. Or sitting there ogling pictures of Channing Tatum in that stripper film, maybe frame it on a wall and stare.

He can’t get defensive, the guy isn’t really there, in the bedroom.

Or masturbate to gay porn where both men are better looking than he is.
It’s just porn, right? No big deal, no reason to get upset. It’s just energy he was never going to require from you anyway, right? It isn’t like you owe him 100% as part of the marriage thing or there’s less to go around for him or there’s an insult against him personally in the act at all. Right?

“(1) a breakdown of expectations and assumptions central to the marriage, (2) a sense of distance or disconnection from their husband and (3) a general sense of being emotionally and psychologically unsafe and insecure in their relationship. Further, it was found that loss of trust was greatly influenced by the sexual nature of pornography and the deceit surrounding its use. These two factors combined to produce a loss of secure attachment, particularly for attachment-oriented and attachment-idealizing wives, who hold the belief that pornography use is not appropriate.”

You don’t get to change the rules after they were agreed upon. You show me one woman who would marry a porn addict if she knew that beforehand.

It’s cheating, the brain doesn’t know the difference. A man who needs porn to get it up or orgasm is impotent, by dictionary definition.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impotence
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/impotence

It also used to mean lack of restraint (like a man who cheats…) because the husband’s energy is directed outside the marital unit.

https://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=3946

It’s poor performance with a real life woman, the wife in this case.

“A common problem among men characterized by the consistent inability to sustain an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse or the inability to achieve ejaculation, or both. Impotence can vary.

So if they can’t get it up to their wife, but they can still do it to a mistress or porn, they are still impotent. This is basic medical fact. They can train other circuits but there is still an impaired circuit, the only important one.

It can involve a total inability to achieve an erection or ejaculation, an inconsistent ability to do so, or a tendency to sustain only very brief erections.”

That performance failure of male duty used to be sufficient reason to get divorced when the Catholic Church was in power, that’s how major it is.
The man’s sexual function in a marriage is more important than the wife’s participation. To blame the woman for his chosen addiction is weak.
If he can’t get it up, that’s his body. She isn’t controlling it Svengali style. He needs a doctor.

“Overall, it was found that a husband’s involvement with pornography can result in a lack of emotional, psychological, and physical availability and responsiveness, and a decrease in closeness and intimacy.”

Exactly the same result as literally going out and screwing those women. Note the type of porn they watch is intended for you to replace the male “actor”, it’s psychological cheating.

It’s voyeurism too, would voyeurism IRL not be cheating somehow?

Masturbation isn’t so much the problem, masturbation and pornography use/addiction are completely separate things.
If he can’t masturbate without porn, which is almost always the case… he has a problem.

“Interacting with the impact of deceit, a spouse’s pornography use clearly provides ample opportunity for the breakdown of secure attachment at a level that can be classified as an attachment rupture or trauma.”

Same result as literal adultery. HD videos trick the brain into treating events as real. It’s worse than real actually, it’s a supernormal stimulus. He wouldn’t film himself screwing one of those women, would he? No, that would seem extreme…..

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10720160903202679
The term emotional infidelity is useful here.

Love and cherish?

“Analyses uncovered three attachment-related impacts from husbands’ pornography use and deception: (1) the development of an attachment fault line in the relationship, stemming from perceived attachment infidelity; (2) followed by a widening attachment rift arising from wives’ sense of distance and disconnection from their husbands; (3) culminating in attachment estrangement from a sense of being emotionally and psychologically unsafe in the relationship. Overall, wives reported global mistrust indicative of attachment breakdown.

Well, escalation involves going out and literally re-enacting it. So yes, practice?
If a spouse practiced murdering you for fun, you’d feel less safe. This abandonment threat is very real and backed up by all metrics, as you’ll see.

Building on this data, we build an attachment-informed model of effects of pornography use and concomitant deception in the pair-bond relationship.”

Pornography is literally clinically damaging to the user.
It does cause ED (PC term for impotence, amazing how men resent un-PC terms on anything relating to them…)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039517/

“Traditional factors that once explained men’s sexual difficulties appear insufficient to account for the sharp rise in erectile dysfunction, delayed ejaculation, decreased sexual satisfaction, and diminished libido during partnered sex in men under 40.”

Alterations to the brain’s motivational system are explored as a possible etiology underlying pornography-related sexual dysfunctions.”

Aforementioned training of responses.

“This review also considers evidence that Internet pornography’s unique properties (limitless novelty, potential for easy escalation to more extreme material, video format, etc.) may be potent enough

I see what you did there. Subtle. I like it.

to condition sexual arousal to aspects of Internet pornography use that do not readily transition to real-life partners, such that sex with desired partners may not register as meeting expectations and arousal declines.”

Husband’s sexual failure. He might as well cut it off, as far as his wife’s concerned, because he’s preventing her from working with it by breaking its healthy function.
She literally cannot do her job, far from it being her fault.
He also makes his own satisfaction impossible, which is deserved all things considered.

It’s like a cocaine user complaining their nose doesn’t work.

Cause and effect doesn’t stop at particles, mate.

“Clinical reports suggest that terminating Internet pornography use is sometimes sufficient to reverse negative effects, underscoring the need for extensive investigation using methodologies that have subjects remove the variable of Internet pornography use.

Translation: they don’t want to look “sex negative” i.e. medically realistic.

If a sex therapist tells you to use porn to spice up your marriage, run.
They make more money off divorced sluts, remember!

I mean, if Elon can be turned off by Amber, this is some major shit we’re dealing with here. Impotence isn’t really a laughing matter. Okay, maybe one prod…

Hardness! Hardness! My billions for some consistent hardness!

Had to get that out of my system. In many cases, the original cause is guilt and the outcome is depression. Since the cause is guilt, the depression is never resolved. Therapists are pussies in this century.

In the interim, a simple diagnostic protocol for assessing patients with porn-induced sexual dysfunction is put forth.”

Translation: we know it’s bad but we don’t know what to do.

Porn addiction and brain damage


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050060/

A significant postulate of this commentary is that all addictions create, in addition to chemical changes in the brain, anatomical and pathological changes which result in various manifestations of cerebral dysfunction collectively labeled hypofrontal syndromes. In these syndromes, the underlying defect, reduced to its simplest description, is damage to the “braking system” of the brain. They are well known to clinical neuroscientists, especially neurologists and neurosurgeons, for they are also seen with tumors, strokes, and trauma. Indeed, anatomically, loss of these frontal control systems is most apparent following trauma, exemplified by progressive atrophy of the frontal lobes seen in serial MRI scans over time.”

In short, no, they cannot make the decision for themselves to continue its use.
That’s like letting a suicidal person cut themselves, also an addiction.

No, they are not allowed that choice. It isn’t a choice. They have to stop.

I know it’s hard. Or at least it would be, if they’d stop.

Compare it to a bad sex diet.

Click to access May%20MP%202015.pdf

” Ironically, a common correlate of pornography use has been found to be a damaged marital sex life.”

No, it makes them worse lovers. Obviously it would, it’s calling doing it not watching it.

Porn has no educational value. There are books and damn, cartoons even depicting and describing positions. Women have no problem viewing those and magazines are full of them. You aren’t supposed to be distracting yourself with masturbation while studying.

“Elliott and Umberson (2008) investigated this very subject, the nature of sex in marriage, and found that 94% of their participants established that sex is a keystone and integral part of marital success; and furthermore, describe sex as a barometer of the health of their marriage.

No, it isn’t just orgasms. It isn’t just sex.

Consequently, marital sexuality also creates a context for potential harm where that vulnerability is not held by one spouse with complete fidelity and trustworthiness.

Porn’s purpose is clear, it’s cheating intellectually. It’s reverse cuckoldry, in a way. They get off, but on the fact they’re picturing themselves doing it with another, instead of actually viewing their Other with someone else. They’re poles apart but very similar.

“Many authors (Brezsnyak & Whisman, 2004; Regan, 2000: Sprecher, 2002; Leavitt & Willoughby, 2015) have found that sexual desire plays an integral role in the marital satisfaction. Consistently, respondents who perceive their marriage to be “happy,” report creating positive experiences within their relationships, tend to label sexual interactions as one way to facilitate and nurture closeness and intimacy with their partners (Impett, Strachman, Finkel, & Gable, 2008).”

My advice to those women is to stream gay porn constantly without doing anything. After all, it’s “entertainment”, like a film? No need to object.

I cannot be bothered to look up any more for now.
The fact this is a subject of discussion is ridiculous, none of you have bothered to look it up.

In medical terms, a thing is harmful until proven healthy. That’s never going to happen with porn but they tried.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10720160600870711?src=recsys

“A review of the research that does exist was undertaken and many negative trends were revealed. While much remains unknown about the impact of Internet pornography on marriages and families, the available data provide an informed starting point for policy makers, educators, clinicians, and researchers.”

Men are pathetic in direct proportion to their sexual desperation.

Porn is causing that, all the attributes of the pajama boy.

It weakens you as men.

Back to the under-covered attachment thing, briefly.

A few studies on how insecure attachment styles (like those caused by porn) make divorce almost a dead-cert. The marriage is over the first time you click online instead of turning to your spouse, really.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J087v31n01_07

“attachment style, as a personality trait, has implications for the higher divorce rate. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between attachment style and marrying multiple times. The findings indicate that multiple marriers are more likely to be avoidantly attached and less likely to be anxiously attached. Additionally, those marrying for the first time to a previously married person have similar insecure attachment Styles.”

Like attracts like.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3061469/

“Husbands’ lower initial level of marital satisfaction measured around the first child’s transition to school was the only significant predictor of marital dissolution.”

Yep, the dude’s fault again.

“In one study of dating relationships, Kirkpatrick and Hazan (1994) found that in a 4-year period, individuals with a secure attachment style had more stable and committed relationships than those with insecure attachment styles. A 31-year longitudinal study (Klohnen & Bera, 1998) revealed similar results.”

You might say, oh, but how do we know porn is making it worse? A fair objection. The methodology would be unpopular but ethical and possible. You study the child’s attachment when it forms and record it throughout the teens, also recording initiation into pornography addiction. If previously secure boys become insecurely attached men, porn is literally ruining men for women by reducing the husband qualities required.

Study women too, that’s fair. It’s just hardly any will statistically count as porn addicts.

If women are to follow their husbands in anything, they must feel supported.

 This study revealed that low levels of perceived spousal support among women characterized as ambivalent were associated with significant declines in marital satisfaction for both the women and their husbands.

Porn takes that away, as studies above show. This is not a minor point. It would be like going to a mechanic that hates cars or a hydrophobic plumber. If something’s wrong, you’d leave it to fester.

How does it work?

The woman senses this emptiness from the man first before he feels the effect on the pair bond between the two of them.

“Another possibility is that attachment security buffers against declines in marital satisfaction, such that the differences between secure and insecure individuals become larger over time.”

That one.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11584789

It would make sense to spot insecurity early and seek treatment. In a eugenic society.

However, a spouse who brings it on themselves merits no sympathy for the choice they know will harm their partner.

The second possibility (buffers) because insecure children also present problems that are consistent and grow over time.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01352.x

“insecure infants are at an increased risk for behavioral disturbances, poor peer relations”

I don’t think you can pin that on a spouse they don’t have?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2741157/

This study extends the existing adult literature on insecure attachment as a predictor of depression and anxiety by examining these pathways in a sample of adolescents. In addition, dysfunctional attitudes and low self-esteem were tested as mediators of the association between insecure attachment and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Youth (N =350; 6th–10th graders) completed self-report measures of attachment, dysfunctional attitudes, self-esteem, and symptoms of depression and anxiety in a 4-wave prospective study. Results indicate that anxious and avoidant attachment each predicted changes in both depression and anxiety (after controlling for initial symptom levels). The association between anxious attachment, but not avoidant attachment, and later internalizing symptoms was mediated by dysfunctional attitudes and low self-esteem. Effects remained even after controlling for initial co-occurring symptoms.

Also no spouse to blame.

Imagine if women had some ailment with their mammary glands and blamed their husband. Impotent men who blame the wife are insane, it’s completely disconnected from reality.

In fact, improper attachment may contribute to mental diseases.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3266769/

Specifically, we review research findings showing that attachment insecurity is a major contributor to mental disorders, and that the enhancement of attachment security can facilitate amelioration of psychopathology.

Yes, they can make their spouse suffer. The personality changes caused by the porn are inherently abusive, more in common with a psychopath (psychopaths are almost entirely porn-addicted).

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/tdp.v3.28647

It’s the brain.

Recent models have moved towards the incorporation of neurodevelopmental, biological and psychosocial approaches to human development. Consequently, there has been a significant conceptual shift, where social experience is currently seen to play a role in shaping the biology and genetic programming of human development,

hence any damage from minors viewing porn is at least somewhat permanent

This is not a church lady problem, it’s worse than drugging kids who hate school. Those seldom cause damage like that, it’s psychological circumcision. It’s horrifying. Addictions disable the mind.

The priming to bring in young boys too, by showcasing schoolgirls. The grooming element of that, imagine a parade of schoolboy porn*, the MRAs would have a field day. Imagine that was considered normal in society, how sick that society must be.

*If it does exist, don’t tell me. Please, I’ve suffered enough.

rather than the simple ‘unfolding’ of a predetermined sequence of developmental stages. In the case of human infants, developmental models need to account for the increasingly recognised contribution of the infant to the social environment and their capacity to interact with and shape environmental responses.

Training. Training their own brain by their chosen habits.

The resilience required of a spouse, especially a husband, is wanting.

http://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1457&context=etd

 

“According to Sroufe (2000), securely attached children are fundamentally different from those classified as insecurely attached. At two years of age, they are more likely to be enthusiastic and persistent in solving easy tasks”

Useful in a marriage….

“Secure school-age children are more sympathetic to peer distress, more assertive about getting their needs met, more likely to be leaders, are better prepared for school”

Useful skills in a future husband.

insecure attachments (i.e., “attachment trauma”)

A child with a history of an insecure attachment may struggle with trusting the intentions and emotional responsiveness of others

So ironically they cause this in spouses with deceitful and demeaning behaviours (including requests of humiliating performance from the spouse to compete with literal whores) pushing them away to validate the paranoia. Yes, that’s what borderlines do too. It’s sadistic. They enjoy breaking people. Testing their limits, crushing their self-respect.

may learn to cope with stressful stimuli by inhibiting strong feelings

Cheating of any sort is a punishment to the existing spouse. Passive aggression is still aggression.

are more likely to have behavior problems, poor peer relations, and lack resilience

problems includes addictions, FYI

Resilience is the number one required quality in a husband.

Porn ruins real sex lives

http://bigthink.com/philip-perry/how-internet-porn-is-changing-how-men-and-women-are-having-sex
That’s the point, then you consume more.
And not just porn.
This used to be called corruption of the young. Their brains are plastic. Socrates deserved it.
Porn, as a supernormal stimulus, affects adults too.
To clarify a previous comment, there is no such thing as a boyfriend or girlfriend and the connection is a nonsense claim. It’s friends with benefits, the clue is in the name. Legally it means nothing. It isn’t traditional either, more like a prostitute in an apartment arrangement, where you pay via utilities and groceries. Those are historical and just another form of hooker. The 19th century in London saw many, an invisible kind of prostitution, as people were forced to cram houses anyway.
Hook-up culture has been designed to alienate men with subpar experiences and in turn put off women since the men don’t want them, so you might as well work overtime.
Porn actors are actors, it isn’t real at all. It’s like basing your knowledge of language on the bursting into song part of
musical numbers. People should be embarrassed to watch it as a puppet show because that’s essentially what it is, a fuck-puppet show.
Without masturbation, how many societal ills would disappear?
In the case of women, would menarche and visible sexualisation of puberty occur later, as it always did in the past? Would men evolve past pajama boy phases with the incentive of more testosterone in their system on a daily basis?
Frigidity, which I mentioned before, is simply an attempt to pathologise a natural female disinterest in sex. There is no such thing as female impotence, because a woman’s completion of the response cycle isn’t required for conception. From this study, we are not shocked to find married women (with the most security and emotional connection, female desires) have the best sex life and as known previously, married people have more sex overall, but it’s surprising to some that men don’t like this free-for-all too. The buffet doesn’t satisfy, it feels cheap because they don’t breed, that is the original fulfillment of the process – the fruit of their loins. Sterile sex appears to be disenchanting men with the whole practice and putting them off the investment for other, deeper kinds. Have you seen a Muslim man unhappy with his sex life? How about a Catholic, the real kind with no contraception?
TLDR: pair bonding is necessary for good sex. Like I said before, if you can’t enjoy vanilla, well, you don’t like ice cream.
The boring people are the ones constantly chasing new things like a dog at a car. That isn’t appreciation, novelty-seeking is too shallow, if anything it’s a form of gluttony, that doesn’t sense the things it takes in.
The Pill probably doesn’t help the female psyche either. Pregnant women are too grumpy to appreciate sex.
An all-male study on male appreciation that they can’t fake would be useful. Sexual satisfaction studies already exist but controls are needed. What are you afraid of finding?
The references in this are interesting. Description bar.

e.g. Endocrine response to masturbation-induced orgasm in healthy men following a 3-week sexual abstinence.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788
In the UK, PornHub was the 35th most visited website for children ages 6 to 14 in 2013.
Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report (2014, October) (p. 232). http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-use- attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf.

We wuz warned.

http://biblehub.com/mark/9-43.htm

jesus lust porn lechery

And if your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, line 47.

http://biblehub.com/mark/9-50.htm

“Salt is good, but if it loses its saltiness, how can you make it salty again? Have salt among yourselves, and be at peace with each other.”

Ah, men.

Is any of this extreme? No, it used to be common sense. As in, most common book in existence?

http://biblehub.com/matthew/10-34.htm

Can’t stop logic, it always breaks in eventually.

http://biblehub.com/matthew/10-26.htm

Stefan’s right, sunlight is the best disinfectant.

http://biblehub.com/matthew/13-12.htm

For to the one who has, more will be given, and he will have an abundance, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.

^ also applies to faith, it’s a cycle of being good, receiving good

http://biblehub.com/matthew/12-33.htm

Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad, for the tree is known by its fruit.

You brood of vipers! How can you speak good, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. [virtue signalling is false piety]

The good person out of his good treasure brings forth good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure brings forth evil.

I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak,

for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”

http://biblehub.com/psalms/58-10.htm

The righteous will rejoice when he sees the vengeance; he will bathe his feet in the blood of the wicked.

Read Candide.
It blew the whistle on moral decay precipitating the decline.
Long before Galt, cultivate your garden, folks.

Psychopath scripts and other scumbag spotting

A highly useful article

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/brainstorm/201712/5-things-psychopaths-and-narcissists-do-in-conversation

Trying to force intimacy is prior to discovering their missing parts.

Related.

When you only have a hammer…

you’re already semi-Communist.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/understanding-the-erotic-code/201712/the-dark-side-outing-men-s-sexual-misdeeds

The authors conclude that the ultimate destination sought by men is “porntopia,” that is, a place of “sheer lust and physical gratification, devoid of courtship, commitment, durable relationships, or mating effort.” On the other hand, they call women’s desired destination “romantopia,” a place of love stories where winning hearts, overcoming obstacles, and getting married reign supreme.

When you only study porn addicts….

Men invented courtly love, so that’s totally off.
There are few poetesses.

There are plenty of masculine female porn addicts (by testosterone).

It is not difficult to see how such information, coupled with the seemingly daily exposure of some men’s unwanted sexual aggression, can lead to the pathologizing of all men as shallow beasts with no control over their impulses. As a sex therapist, however, I have seen the depth of men’s suffering around trying to bridge the gap between their attachment language and their partner’s.

When you only speaking to the suffering….

And it isn’t pathologizing if they have a pathology.
NAMALT, he cries, to cover the obvious error in logic. Even if it’s 99%, that still isn’t good, is it? Never trust a sex therapist, they are some of the worst humans in existence and want to spread the misery.

 Instead, they are hoping that their partner can understand when they use language or actions in the bedroom that may objectify the partner, they are seeking erotic intimacy.

You see, there’s the stupid illogic of saying I didn’t want to kill them, your Honour, only stab them fifty times.
You bring that suffering on yourself.

Assuming women should accommodate men when the sexes are different is absurd.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201711/the-truth-about-sex-differences?collection=1107987

Men shouldn’t accommodate women either. You negotiate and meet halfway like adults

Objectification is demeaning. It’s demeaning to male models as much as female.
You shouldn’t be demeaning anyone you personally know,it’s a form of emotional abuse, however normalised by perverts. Porn is a fantasy of women you do not know. That is the attraction. The association of objectifying them is porn-learned behaviour.

Intimacy is emotional. It doesn’t require the physical. They need to work on their emotions by speaking to the woman, not griping to another man who will console them that they’re fine – because neither get it. You’re fine, just the way you are – spoken like a true SJW. You see, the more you suffer personally, the more they gain.

Consider the source.

You don’t go to a woman for information on erections, do you?

If a woman relinquished all forms of companionship and emotional support, a man would feel repelled, however ‘good’ the sex. That is essentially what these men are doing. Do not treat your woman like a porn star. You wouldn’t want other men to and she’s the one you’re meant to love best. You can try new things without insulting a woman’s dignity, which is the more common form of virtue when chastity is out the window.

You have half the bargain. You don’t do your half, she’s in the right to walk because you fail as a spouse. If you’re not spouses, you owe nothing. She owes you nothing, because you provide no security, which all women crave. This used to be common sense.

Think back to the 50s. Did men want to think of their wife like a stripper? Did they speak of, treat her in those terms? Let alone the hooker many men think they want. Thanks MTV!

Your downstairs brain will ruin your life.

A woman’s nurturing instinct is killed dead by a man who objectifies her body, because a woman’s most precious resources are inner beauty.

Happy husbands do not objectify their wives, this erodes love over time. This should rest my case but you can’t tell a blind man what he’s missing.

 The least helpful thing one can do is succumb wholly to one’s bias toward a feminine approach to relationship, forcing the man into greater feelings of self-loathing, shame, and suppression of his desires.

Sex therapist encourages fornication.

Is that not unhealthy for the men too?
I mean, impulse control in men is just so 19th Century, and we all know how poor the quality of those average men.

And bias? If it isn’t a choice, or an obligation, how is bias the correct term?

Without balancing both of men and women’s sexual and relational needs, there is a risk of creating even more distance between them.

The Sexual Revolution has only been good for us. We are never/always at war with dissatisfactionBad sex is the cardinal sin. You have too much/too little/bad quality and there’s always, ALWAYS something wrong with yougimme money. I can’t fix the problem though, that’s down to you, and whether you feel you need more development work Mafia style beat downs to your ego, courtesy of the people who know your body better than you and just care too damn much. They only want world peace! A fuck-a-thon orgy for peace!

How about a balance of life and death? Hunger and gluttony? Nude and prude?

A balance between good and evil is not physically possible, and that keeps ‘therapists’ rolling in bucks. Either it’s prosocial or antisocial. What is sleeping around? What is an objectifying (psychopathic) attitude to the pair bonding event of sex?

Ugh, r-vendors.

At least preachers are sincere.

Psychopaths objectify naturally, we’re all ants to them. Used/abused/crushed to amuse.

Those of us who have studied and trained in the concept of healthy sexuality—not just sexual pathology—realize the vast ranges of erotic expression in humans. We have barely begun to open to the idea that what has been acceptable culturally—heteronormative, monoganormative, and vanilla sex—does not begin to address who we really are.

“Vanilla sex” is actually healthy, normal, evolutionary sex. If you can’t appreciate normal sex, there is something medically wrong with you.

There’s the money, there’s the sale, there is what you’re really paying for.

Degenerates. Always preaching, always selling.

Go gay for Putin!

To think of all men as having pathological attitudes about sex is a sure way to shut down the emerging awareness of the myriad ways in which we can healthfully engage in this most basic expression of love and attachment, and differentiate it from the unhealthy ways we are seeing it played out in the media

He just said it isn’t about love and is 100% lust but ignore logic.
OMG it’s basic how can you argue with something so basic just go to a standard fuckparty and express yourself so basic, the only way to attach to another human being requires the Kama Sutra (btw quite a shit book).

Related, do gaslighters know what they’re doing?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/are-gaslighters-aware-what-they-dov

Duh. They know they get a thrill out of putting down good/kind/vulnerable people.
You wonder why there are less of them in the world?

The manipulations of gaslighters.

The Alt Right has been flooded with them, power-tripping on the quickly disappearing women and ‘beta virgins’ – no, they won’t read any evolution that makes them know how dumb they are.
“it’s okay to bully you, we’re on the same side” (in evidence, they only care about themselves, not even other white men)
“take a joke, you’re not allowed to be offended by banter” (British term, stop using it America)
“you’re too sensitive, stop caring about things” (not inc. their shit-tier opinions)
“what a loser” (by their highly subjective standards where they are #1 alpha dog in charge)

It would be sad if they weren’t so toxic. Gaslighters are a type of emotional vampire, this is why they threaten to leave – they feed on the drama of being begged to stay.

They leave when the host runs out of histrionics they can cause/manipulate (narcissistic supply) and they kill whatever movement they’re in (the cause of the manosphere implosion).

Men are dumb to gaslighters, failing to distinguish it from regular bullying or, in denser cases, bonding banter. When someone ostracizes you for existing, they’re not trying to bond?
It’s actually the Mean Girls unique form of bullying, deeply female. Isolation, esteem pummeling, all girls have experience with this. Bitchy traps like “you’re really pretty…. so you agree?” are tactically designed to plant a poisonous little seed of doubt or trigger some pain, the stupid men tend to skip ahead and insult a woman’s body parts e.g. her womb and/or fuckability, same as Mean Girls – pregnancy/whore slander and sluttiness/prude impossible fake standards. Think how low a man must be to verbally abuse a woman by her children, existent or not?

Others gaslight in order to feel some sense of control in their own lives by making others depend on them. Gaslighting can also be part of an authoritarian personality. A person with an authoritarian personality tends to think in absolutes: Things are 100 percent right or 100 percent wrong. When a gaslighter thinks that they are not the problem and everyone else is, this is called having an ego-syntonic personality.

It can be very difficult to get ego-syntonic gaslighters into treatment; they believe nothing is wrong with them.

That is called a lie.
In truth, they don’t care or see it as an advantage.
They’re the atheistkultists who lie about Darwin.

A gaslighting spouse or partner may either refuse to go to therapy, or if they do attend with you, they may tell the therapist that you are the problem.

If the therapist recommends that the gaslighter changes a behavior, the gaslighter will label the therapist as incompetent.

Even in therapy, a gaslighter may not truly be aware of, or may refuse to acknowledge that their behavior is the problem.

Worthless scum.

Even if a person is practicing gaslighting behavior without being consciously aware of it, they may get a “payoff” when their victim becomes more dependent on them. And then the cycle continues. The gaslighter also gets a “boost” when there are no checks and balances in place—no one holding them accountable for their behavior.

They claim not to be aware but they know it makes them feel strong?

K.

Someone fell for it. The sob story.

If a gaslighter is not aware of their manipulative behavior, that does not make it acceptable—it is still pathological, and it is still their responsibility. For gaslighters who have read up on this behavior or were taught it, of course, the same rule applies.

People tell them constantly. The definition of insanity? They’re just dense, they will never learn, so they’re commonly just a type of sociopath forever blaming their parents.

Negging is like gaslighting lite. They act like it’s nothing but select for the broken, like attracts like. Anyone with a spine is a ‘bitch’ or in the case of men, ‘an asshole.’ Lord Fauntleroy wants his way so the world must bow to Little Emperor…

ADHD/ADD nurture studies to piss off the idiots

Having a brain scan doesn’t prove shit.

The brain scans, as covered before, show you have brain damage.
They do not say why and there’s no genetic link proven.

It’s linked with a ton of nurture stuff.

e.g.

GABA signalling is off

https://psychcentral.com/news/2017/11/04/scientists-identify-chemical-in-brain-that-helps-us-stop-unwanted-thoughts/128306.html

that fucks up the train of thought.

GABA helps your brain to inhibit. It’s impulse control. It’s delay of gratification.

https://www.healthyplace.com/blogs/livingwithadultadhd/2017/09/that-stupid-marshmallow-study-adhd-and-self-control/

The marshmallow test is like an inverse IQ test, if you fail, because rare among psych tests you can actually fail it – your life outcomes suck.

“Self-control with ADHD is possible.” Don’t blame your genes, your parents don’t have it.

It’s also similar in symptom to less PC disorders like conduct disorders and intermittent explosive disorder (that’s being a criminal and throwing temper tantrums that involve destruction of property or assault to normal people). And you thought affluenza was bad. Parents don’t want to feel guilty about their parenting ‘skills’ and the fact they’re happy to drug up their child than impose some disciplinary techniques, which are proven to assist in the learning of that skill. LEARNING.

It’s considered a neckbeard condition. Why?

https://psychcentral.com/news/2017/02/07/mediterranean-diet-tied-to-fewer-adhd-diagnoses/116142.html

Stereotypes are true.

Good oils/fats like olive oil and butter instead of toxic vegetable oil, palm and canola  oil produce good nerves.
What is the brain literally made of again?

The team also found a higher prevalence of ADHD among children who consumed high levels of candy and sugary drinks and low levels of fatty fish.

Omega 3 supplements won’t save you now, lardass.
Don’t bring your weak scientism game into this house.

This is MA house.

If you actually checked the shit I talk about, you’d easily find it.
You’re intellectually curious right? You don’t just read wikipedia because you’re too lazy to read a single book? You know wikipedia ranks below fucking Cosmo, right? It isn’t reading.

Vitamin deficiency… Entire diseases can’t be caused by that, right?

https://www.noorvitamins.com/Health-Blog/vitamin-deficiency-diseases/

That wouldn’t affect brain development at all, would it, ubermales?
I bet you know starvation is actually malnourishment, regardless of calorie count.
If an adult starves themselves, we say they have a disease, sure.

https://psychcentral.com/news/2013/02/21/mouse-study-links-high-fat-diets-adhd-and-obesity/51790.html

It’s a slow form of suicide.

“memory-dependent learning disabilities” – yeah, you’re high IQ, we believe you
Is this like the new autism where you claim a sparkling snowflake high-functioning version of something literally defined by its developmental deficits? Look up category mistake.

“Freund said that altered dopamine signaling in the brain is common to both ADHD and the overweight or obese state.”

Plot twist: another neckbeard trope.

https://www.mentalhelp.net/articles/the-brains-of-porn-addicts/

Recent research has shown that non-drug addictions such as gambling, binge-eating, and sexual activities affect brain function in ways similar to alcohol and drug addiction. [12] Many addiction studies focus on what is referred to as the pleasure/reward circuitry and their corresponding neurotransmitters – chemicals that are responsible for the communication between neurons. One of the neurotransmitters frequently identified as central to addiction is dopamine. A behavior or drug that produces pleasure induces a rush of dopamine that ultimately “reinforces” that behavior, making it more likely to occur. The amygdala, basal ganglia, and other reward centers play a role in the reinforcement of the activity that produces pleasure.

So they’re likelier by far to self-medicate with… porn addiction.

These individuals also tend to have less connectivity between the striatum and areas of the prefrontal cortex, indicating reduced judgment, decision making, or control over impulsive behaviors.

You devolve. Neuroscientifically. You roll back your brain evolution.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/scary-effects-pornography-21st-centurys-accute-addiction-rewiring/

Is porn addiction genetic too?
Does Muh Genetics really excuse being an obnoxious prick all the time?

Then there’s a physiological impact. A 2015 study by researchers at the University of California found a rare positive correlation between porn watching and libido, but the consensus is on the opposite side. Last year, for instance, NHS experts noted an increase in erectile dysfunction in otherwise healthy young men, and thought excessive porn use was the most likely factor at play.

Prick, get it?

While many would argue the strength of porn doesn’t matter, as long as it is purely fantasy and consensual, it’s likely even a mild consumption fundamentally alters the way a person views sex. Studies have confirmed that the dopamine increase resulting from porn potentially means users require a greater and greater sensation from real sex in order to match what they can so easily access.

Porn-watching was linked to infidelity in another study, again American, which found that seeing multiple sexual partners on screen subtly wounds a committed relationship by convincing the watcher that the grass will be greener on the other side, no matter how happy you are with your current situation.

Hypofrontality is linked to pair bond death. It’s like a serial killer showing a conscience.

There’s nothing there.

 Some might remember the alarming suggestion, in 2014, that people’s brains shrink the more they watch pornography.

Keep re-testing. Oh wait, they don’t want to be seen as sex-negative.

Volumetric studies are easy, it’s either bigger, the same or … smaller. A lot smaller.

Note: 2D waifus are fine, it’s 3D real-seeming, moving porn that’s the issue.

Going to an ADHD brain study

https://www.decodedscience.org/basal-ganglia-studies-and-attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-adhd/6074

Remember from above?

The amygdala, basal ganglia, and other reward centers play a role in the reinforcement of the activity that produces pleasure.”

So what reward gushing behaviours are being reinforced?

Amygdala?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26964869

Sure.

Go nuts.

Patients with ADHD tend to have smaller amygdala volumes. ADHD patients presented less activation in the area of the left frontal pole than the controls. There was no amygdala activation stated when presenting the pleasant images. 

https://psychcentral.com/disorders/adhd/causes-of-adult-attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-adhd/

Many things that cause IQ to drop like a rock (e.g. lead poisoning, a chavvy mother, shitty prole diet).

A 2002 study found that children with ADHD had 3-4 percent smaller brain volumes in all the brain regions measured. But children on ADHD medication had similar brain volumes to unaffected children, in some of the areas measured.

Picture that in IQ terms.

One big difference was the amount of “white matter” — long-distance connections between brain regions that normally become stronger as a child grows up. Children with ADHD who had never taken medication had an abnormally small volume of white matter.

Wonder why there are so few female psychopaths?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748110/

Someone’s lying.

Immune to correction, no remorse even after punishment.

https://www.livescience.com/49613-psychopaths-brains-punishment.html

Psychopathy is marked by impulsivity, an absence of guilt over hurting others, and often superficial charm.

But they’re smarter cos they claim to be online. Why lie, right?
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/412678/brain-images-reveal-the-secret-to-higher-iq/
“They found a strong correlation between the integrity of the white matter and performance on a standard IQ test. “Going forward, we are certainly going to think of white matter structure as an important contributor of intelligence,” says Van Wedeen, a neuroscientist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, who was also not involved in the research. “It also changes how you think about what IQ is measuring,” says Wedeen. The research was published last month in the Journal of Neuroscience.”

The criminals had been convicted of murder, rape, attempted murder or grievous bodily harm in the United Kingdom.

In the group of criminals who were psychopathic, the scientists observed lower volumes of gray matter in brain regions involved in empathy, moral reasoning, and the processing of social emotions such as guilt and embarrassment. They also found abnormalities in white matter fibers leading to the prefrontal cortex, in regions involved in learning from reward and punishment.

Ah, but what about the grey matter, they cry like a pig at a Ren Fayre?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2829134/

Yeah, fuck you, too.
BTW, that method wasn’t designed for white matter so the finding on it doesn’t count.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17291727

“Overall, restricted structural brain abnormalities caused by ADHD were localized to brain systems known to be necessary for attention and executive function.”

And what they do have is like cellular Jenga.

As for the similarities to borderline previously discussed.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929315000626

It’s become an excuse for the lazy and stupid, like how anxiety only kicks in with certain people when you disagree with them.

https://apsard.org/smart-people-can-have-adhd-too/

The American Professional Society of ADHD and Related Disorders writes: We know from many studies that ADHD is associated with a slightly lower intelligence quotient (IQ) and with problems in thinking known as executive function deficits.

IQ tests for executive function. Look it up.

For the average, mass of the bell curve, it’s the same.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12610776

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055994

Like, omg, are you anti-science?

Bill Nye wouldn’t lie to you, he’s such a great… engineer…

An ADD magazine writes

https://www.additudemag.com/low-iq-in-adhd-adults-may-not-reflect-intelligence/

Study: Low IQ Scores Do Not Reflect Low Intelligence in Adults with ADHD

Sure thing, like not having two working legs doesn’t make you any less able to win the race, if they move the finish line under your feet.

Because that’s how scientific constructs work, y’know, you just drop the standards for this one group and it’s all fine.

Reality bends around the entitlement.

Isn’t Nature grand?

ADHD doesn’t seem to be genetic, but the eerily similar low IQ is!

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14681911

Co-occurrence of ADHD and low IQ has genetic origins

Wouldn’t low IQ also affect parenting ability, diet, proclivity to smoking during pregnancy? Wouldn’t those things kinda be important, considering humans are born early and our brains need to develop for decades?

We show here that the co-occurrence of ADHD and lower IQ has genetic origins: 86% of the association between ADHD symptom scores and IQ, and 100% of the association between ADHD diagnosis and IQ, was accounted for by genetic influences that are shared by ADHD and IQ. Some candidate genes for ADHD could also contribute to variation in IQ or vice versa.

100%, that’ll be easy to talk around.

reddit.com
/r/ADHD/comments/47ecg7/adhd_vs_low_iq/

Talking shit is a symptom.

Is it the new retard label?

Retard meaning slow. Slow to learn. That’s the original definition.
IQ being created by Binet to detect the retarded specifically.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050060/

Although the key elements of hypofrontal syndromesimpulsivity, compulsivity, emotional lability, impaired judgment—are well described, much of the process is still unknown.

Assuming you’re born with it doesn’t help.

One emerging aspect of these hypofrontal states is their similarity to findings in addictive patients.

I see someone is using their brain.

Addressing hypofrontality, Fowler et al. noted, “studies of addicts show reduced cellular activity in the orbitofrontal cortex, a brain area…[relied upon]…to make strategic, rather than impulsive, decisions. Patients with traumatic injuries to this area of the brain display problems–aggressiveness, poor judgment of future consequences, inability to inhibit inappropriate responses that are similar to those observed in substance abusers.”[8] (emphasis added).

What does that have to do with diet?

The obesity study demonstrated multiple areas of volume loss, particularly in the frontal lobes, areas associated with judgment and control.

check m8

A decade ago Dr. Howard Shaffer at Harvard wrote, “I had great difficulty with my own colleagues when I suggested that a lot of addiction is the result of experience … repetitive, high-emotion, high-frequency experience. But it’s become clear that neuroadaptation—that is, changes in neural circuitry that help perpetuate the behavior—occurs even in the absence of drug-taking.”[13] More recently he wrote, “Although it is possible to debate whether we should include substance or process addictions within the kingdom of addiction, technically there is little choice. Just as the use of exogenous substances precipitate impostor molecules vying for receptor sites within the brain, human activities stimulate naturally occurring neurotransmitters. The activity of these naturally occurring psychoactive substances likely will be determined as important mediators of many process addictions.”

Translation: it isn’t just drugs, behaviours count.

AKA why behaviourism works.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0893608089900270

perseveration

aka talking shit non-stop

You need the drugs right? They make you feel like it isn’t your fault.

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/adhd-zoe/2010/06/mantra-meditation-an-adhd-panacea/

Meditation is free.

Of particular benefit to ADHDers is the affect of chanting on frontal lobe activity. The frontal lobe is said to be responsible for executive functioning, a function of the brain that is underdeveloped in ADHDers, rendering us incapable of pulling it all together to be successful. Executive functioning is said to provide the ability to plan, organize, keep track of time, complete tasks on time, control emotions, and much more. (For more information on executive function, click here).

The website The Secrets of Yoga states:

“In studies performed at Arizona University, it was shown through a PET scan how a change occurred in the activity of the brain from the frontal part to the parietal part during the chanting of the mantra Sa Ta Na Ma. This change indicated an improvement in mood and alertness.”

Why should taxpayers fund you when you’re too lazy to do the free shit as an adult that helps?
Drugs don’t grow your frontal lobe, it’s like a mute button on the problem, a band-aid on the broken bone. Freeing you up to make the problem worse and act like it’s society’s fault, almost like you cannot learn a lesson…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2015/05/26/harvard-neuroscientist-meditation-not-only-reduces-stress-it-literally-changes-your-brain/?utm_term=.37fa0599389d

Yeah, this Harvard neuroscientist doesn’t know as much as redditfags.

“We also found they had more gray matter in the frontal cortex

https://psychcentral.com/lib/the-vicious-cycle-of-adult-add-shame-and-compulsive-sexuality/

Many sexual compulsives with ADD have had experiences like Brian’s. They struggled in school because they got bored or had a hard time paying attention. Once bored, they would stare out the window, often caught up by sexual fantasies….Most feel the self-loathing of people who are working under capacity, and experience the pain and grief of living a life of lost opportunities and diminished personal potential.

Boo fucking hoo.

It’s an excuse for suburban white middle-class brats to act hard done by.

The rest of us got bored too, we still got shit done.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/01/when-adhd-isnt-what-it-seems/384537/

You know the middle-class wino moms? also a factor

Most importantly, children who have FASD require different types of treatments than those who have standard hyperactivity disorder. “About 74 percent of children with FASD do meet criteria for ADHD,” he said, “but, because of all the neurochemistry changes from the alcohol, it’s a different kind of ADHD.”

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/middle-class-oarents-of-children-with.html

How to treat ADHD? Stigmatise it. The simplest and most responsible thing this government should do – but I know it won’t – is to put any child who has ADHD into a special class of ADHD sufferers or even put them into an ADHD *school*. That would shut these parents up good and proper.

You wanna be snowflakes, you get a special school.

Well, if they are annoying you and won’t stop annoying you, then it is their bloody fault. 

They shouldn’t be allowed around neurotypical students, for the sake of everyone, including themselves. If it’s a real condition they can’t help.

We used to call many of those symptoms being a spoiled brat or plain rude.
Being obnoxious isn’t chargeable though. Send them to special military academies to learn the discipline research shows is possible? That would help them, it’s for their own good. After all, people with a mental disease, especially minors, must listen to the experts.

It isn’t as if they’re just lazy.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/03/dyslexia-isnt-real-but-dont-worry-neither-is-adhd/

Anyway, the team from Durham — that most middle-class of all universities, just to rub it in — suggested that the word ‘dyslexia’ be consigned to the history books. It is utterly meaningless. It is a pretentious word for ‘thick’.

Your beloved academia.
Full of people like me.

Pathologising children is evil. Pathologising adults never absolves them of responsibility for their actions. Nobody is above the law.

Dr Richard Saul, who has been investigating this area for many years, has come to the conclusion that ADHD is a meaningless term, too. Again, you and I both knew this instinctively, but even more so — even more than with dyslexia — we dare not say it.

Shit Fitness Disorder didn’t pass the committee board.

Dr Saul believes the expensive and horrible drugs — such as Ritalin — with which these devil-monkeys are chemically restrained are more injurious than helpful. Give the kids a proper diet rather than drugs, he argues, try not to feed them an almost continuous supply of brown, deep-fried, fat-soaked, filth. And look after them properly — read them Auden and Eliot and get them working on Fermat’s last theorem. A refusal to pay attention is not a disease, not a medical condition — it’s a character flaw, and one which could be stamped out given the necessary willpower from the parents.

It’s literally why we have schools.

Lumping kids in by age is stupid. If you can pass adult exams at 6, you should be allowed.

If the food needs to be good, the parents have to spend more and maybe cook?
How dare a child be expensive for anyone but the taxpayer.

The sufferers alleged that it was a hate crime to suggest — as most medical practitioners do, in private — that both ‘illnesses’ were rooted squarely in the noggin. Uh-oh, let’s draw a veil, I can see my inbox filling up already and the plod calling round.

Calling a spade a spade… is probably a hate crime actually. But we have genetics so fuck them, and better genetics, so it’s funny since you’d expect them to deny it.
So ironic most ADHD claim to be pro-science libertarians defending free speech.

Wait, wait, if that wasn’t special enough, they also claim hyperfocus.

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/sex-addiction/2013/03/the-power-of-porn-attention-hyperfocus-and-dissociation/

That’s right, they’re TOO focused because they…. can’t focus….

Being glued to the computer screen for hours on end looking at pornography can be seen in adults with ADHD as a symptom of that disorder, namely hyperfocus (or more properly perseveration) which is a form of rigid attention.

So they have no trouble paying attention to porn but somehow the teacher isn’t kinky enough?
Yes, that sounds like nature. The nature of a wanker.

It gets better

Dr. Russell Barkley has argued that what we call the ADHD “hyperfocus,” should really be called “perseveration” a symptom of the frontal lobe issues in ADHD.

He argues that “hyperfocus” is a term that more appropriately relates to autism spectrum disorders, where the person has a problem connecting different areas of the brain.  The two terms seem to be used popularly to describe similar behavior of disappearing into the stimulus or activity.

They stole it from the autistics. It doesn’t really apply.

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/sex-addiction/2012/10/attention-deficit-disorder-and-sex-addiction-whats-the-connection/

He found that it is not impulsivity but the detrimental affects on self-esteem suffered by children with ADHD that causes them to seek to self-medicate with drugs or sex to cope with their poor self concept and low self confidence. (This argument rests on the fact that many adults with ADHD began as children with ADHD.)

It isn’t Shawnie’s fault he does the drugs, he just needs to love himself more!
Are you high to believe this? I guess it’d help.

The low self-esteem explanation makes sense in light of the fact cited by Dr. Reid that 11-35% of people with chemical dependency and pathological gambling also have adult ADHD.

Sounds more like an excuse for adult immaturity.
I’d like to gamble too. Most people would. Like they don’t have a choice?

If they don’t have a choice, why aren’t they in asylums? We lock people up who cannot be held responsible for their actions, for public safety. Freedom is predicated on the fact you can choose to do the legal thing. They’re taking drugs anyway, that needs to be under observation anyway.

As children, virtually the only drug available is sexual self-soothing.

You know, self-abuse used to be common in Victorian asylum inmates?

Hating their parents is also a factor. Abandonment, which class complains of that?

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/sex/2014/07/narcissism-porn-use-and-addiction/

Narcissists don’t fear though, they zone out because they’re dissociating a false memory of the event of your reproach. Bullshit, they try to scream through the screen at me!

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1087054714556814?journalCode=jada

False Memory in Adults With ADHD: A Comparison Between Subtypes and Normal Controls

I said. Ma house.

The adults with ADHD have more false memories than the controls and that false memory formation varied with the ADHD subtypes.

But the drugs! The drugs! The drugs they take, legal or not!

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/sex-addiction/2013/05/can-ritalin-help-cure-sex-addicts/

“Drugs of abuse confuse these pathways, thus leading to compulsive drug-seeking and the lack of inhibitory control that contribute to an addict’s relapse.” and

Nah, makes it worse. Again, retarded, slow to learn. If ever.

“Although a standard U.S. diagnostic manual (the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition or DSM-IV) describes multiple addictions, each tied to a specific substance or activity, consensus is emerging that these may represent multiple expressions of a common underlying brain process.”

Some researchers have questioned whether there is solid evidence for the notion that the brain effects of behavioral addictions like porn addiction are identical to those of chemical addictions and future research will clarify the processes involved in various addictions.

But data continue to come in.  Another recent study reportedly found that cannabisusers had lower levels of dopamine production and that dopamine levels were lowest for those who started earlier and those who smoked more cannabis.  The authors postulate that this could explain the “amotivational syndrome” sometimes claimed to be a result of cannabis use.  They also point to the parallel between their results and those relating to altered dopamine systems in cocaine and amphetamine users.

Ritalin helps coke addicts.

“Using fMRI, we found that methylphenidate did indeed have a beneficial impact of the connectivity between several brain centers associated with addiction.”

Yeah, but narcissists can’t get addicted to Ritalin, right?

http://www.ritalinabusehelp.com/how-does-narcissism-relate-to-ritalin-addiction

Ritalin is a stimulant that promotes wakefulness, increased attentiveness and euphoria. Drug users strongly seek these effects, which means they will go to great lengths for this substance. In addition, Ritalin is a prescription drug that is commonly prescribed, which gives users easy access to the drug. In other words, people with narcissism have a high susceptibility for drug abuse, which increases the chance for addiction. Narcissistic individuals have a high-risk for Ritalin addiction for the following reasons:

  • Narcissists are often isolated from others because people avoid these patients. To cope with loneliness or to impress others, they may abuse drugs like Ritalin to boost their energy.

  • Narcissists are attention-seekers, so they may engage in risky, reckless and abnormal behaviors for a rush and attention

  • Narcissists feel superior to others, like their actions and behaviors are limitless. Narcissists typically exude rebellion and troublesome behavior, because they think the rules don’t apply to them.

  • Narcissistic individuals lack empathy for others, so when their drug use causes harm, it only makes them feel more powerful

I’m sure the Ritalin abuse helpline knows nothing on the subject.

It doesn’t even fix depression. This is claimed in a weasel word way.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200312/ritalin-blues

Ritalin Blues is a term.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927251/

Both children developed suicidal ideation that abated after discontinuing the drug. There were no depressive symptoms reported along with it, and the ideation could not be explained on the basis of impulsivity either.

Sure, take the kill pills. You need ’em, right?

I wasn’t going to post this and went easy before and before that, but considering that smug aura of fake superiority, I had to take 15 minutes to write up the obvious. For people who can read. I can do this to anyone, try me. Some of us are genuinely scientifically literate.

Aspergers actually male borderline personality disorder?

It is weird there’s a high-functioning category of a developmental disability.

You’d think that’s physically impossible if you, you know, have logic. Either you’re disabled or you aren’t.

Title for SEO.
I won’t even say anything, really, I’ll just link to some chew.
Minimal explanations.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7449446_Borderline_personality_disorder_and_Asperger_syndrome

Note: Aspergers no longer exists in America. It is no longer clinically recognized in the DSM, stripped of its own category status in the Fifth Edition into NOS, a misc. category. Suck on that first.

http://www.parents.com/health/autism/what-happened-to-aspergers/

A personality disorder would befit the high-functioning section, but the low-functioning would still classify as autism. It fits with features of NPD, BPD and ASPD.

http://aapel.org/asp/AGaspergerornotUS.html

We need studies on this.

http://aspertypical.com/2013/06/12/the-borderline-of-aspergers-the-similarities-between-borderline-personality-disorder-and-autism/

Can we double-blind it and still distinguish the two?

http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/207/5/392

Adolescents with ASD show high rates of callous–unemotional traits but, unlike in the general population, these are not strongly associated with conduct problems.

Google “successful sociopaths”

 Individuals with ASD have difficulty recognising emotions2 (although see Jones et al3) and understanding the mental states of others, also known as theory of mind,4 both of which are thought to contribute to problems in social functioning. Executive dysfunction is also reported in individuals with ASD, and may underlie restrictive and repetitive symptoms. Impairments occur on tasks of planning, response selection/monitoring and inhibition of pre-potent response in children5and adolescents,6 as well as reduced cognitive flexibility.7 With regard to common coexisting behavioural problems, individuals with ASD are at higher risk of co-occurring psychopathology.810Individuals with ASD display increased antisocial and aggressive behaviour as children11 and oppositional defiant disorder as adolescents

can’t recognize emotions in faces

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3086821/

repetition because they can’t learn from experience

https://news.yale.edu/2016/11/28/psychopaths-can-regret-bad-decisions-don-t-learn-them

narrow-mindedness/boldness

“Mental rigidity or thought addiction to rational thinking” – The Mask of Sanity, by Hervey Cleckley, one of psychopathy’s 16 qualities.

high risk of pathology

antisocial and aggressive as children

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955848/

acting up as teens

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796980

^things common to psychopaths

The explanatory role of attention–deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in the association between executive functioning and callous–unemotional traits is not well understood; controlling for ADHD has been reported to eradicate the relationship between executive functioning and delinquency in adolescents.

So there’s also a link from ADHD diagnosis and minors behaving like criminals.
Otherwise that’s a downright magical disappearing act. Jesus-tier.

 Individuals with ASD and those with callous–unemotional traits can sometimes present similarly, at least on a superficial level, yet this may be as a result of different aetiological processes. Despite phenotypic similarity, twin studies report largely independent genetic influences (an overlap of 0.43) on autistic and psychopathic traits

May?

And 0.43 is a moderately strong correlation!

43%!

Remember, this is ASD, not just Aspergers.

These studies suggest that some individuals with ASD also show callous–unemotional traits, perhaps as a result of a ‘double-hit’, with the emotional processes implicated in callous–unemotional being affected, in addition to the social cognitive difficulties typically present in individuals with ASD (for example theory of mind impairment). However, whether these findings hold in larger, population-based samples remains unexplored.

We test whether the strong association

wait wait wait
What happened to the blithe ‘largely independent’?

between these traits and conduct problems reported in the general population also applies to those with ASD, and describe additional psychiatric symptoms associated with callous–unemotional traits. Finally, we test whether a specific impairment in fear recognition is associated with callous–unemotional traits, as in non-ASD populations, and explore whether these traits are associated with difficulties in theory of mind and cognitive functioning.

Lower down
way down
Down to academic Hell.

There are two possible explanations for the remarkably high prevalence of callous–unemotional traits in our sample of adolescents with ASD.

Option 3 – you’re a filthy liar?

The dissociation of callous–unemotional from conduct problems in ASD may indicate a different cognitive underpinning. Alternatively, the sociocognitive difficulties associated with ASD may lead to reduced exposure to peers and prevent individuals from engaging in the more socialised and peer-related aspects of conduct-disordered behaviour.

Things that also apply to sociopaths for $100.

Clinicians have been concerned that some people with ASD appear to show high levels of callous–unemotional traits and the present study supports this clinical impression for a subset of individuals…. Parents, caregivers and other people working with individuals with ASD may require specific psychoeducation about these traits, which are often distressing to others but are not necessarily a predictor of antisocial behaviour.

Yeah, they don’t really love you, but it’s fine! They probably won’t attack you. (see bottom)
The clinicians are concerned but the parents should be happy to leave them alone around the knives.

https://www.autism.com/treating_self-injurious

Some children bite themselves and others, and hit other children and their parents with such violence they have broken bones.

autism speaks, but it also punches

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3849991/

Differential diagnoses
  • ADHD
  • alexithymia
  • avoidant personality disorder
  • antisocial personality disorder
  • borderline personality disorder
  • narcissistic personality disorder…

Only a few studies to date have addressed the question of how late-diagnosed AS can be distinguished from its psychiatric comorbidities and differential diagnoses

$$$$$

Persons with AS are often highly educated and capable of living independently, yet half are unemployed and have a low socioeconomic status.

If I switched AS with psychopathy, it would fit better.

The differential diagnosis of AS includes schizoid, obsessive-compulsive, and avoidant personality disorders.

Back to the repetition common to all of these.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perseveration

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304146

Psychopaths love repeating stuff too.

The findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting potential contributions of frontotemporal structural deficits in neurocognitive impairment with perseveration in individuals with psychopathy.

http://www.alasbimnjournal.net/contenidos/frontal-and-temporal-lobe-dysfunction-in-autism-and-other-related-disorders-adhd-and-ocd-80

https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/125/7/1594/409313/Brain-anatomy-and-sensorimotor-gating-in-Asperger

The mean volume difference in combined grey matter deficit regions between Asperger’s and control groups was 16% (P < 0.001). No areas of excess grey matter volume were noted in people with Asperger’s syndrome.

Brain damage.

White matter deficits in subjects with Asperger’s syndrome were also extensive, but appeared to be concentrated in the left hemisphere (Fig. 3). The deficits extended fronto‐temporally,

Again, quoting.

frontotemporal structural deficits in neurocognitive impairment with… psychopathy”

Back to the high-functioning IQ bullshit

https://jneurodevdisorders.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1866-1955-5-14

Deficits in working memory are central to many theories of psychopathology, and are generally linked to frontal-lobe dysfunction. This article will review neuropsychological and (functional) brain imaging studies on working memory in adolescents with ASD. Although still disputed, it is concluded that within the working memory system specific problems of spatial working memory are often seen in adolescents with ASD. These problems increase when information is more complex and greater demands on working memory are made.

The most complex demand is an IQ test.

Connection? Widely known.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050565/

Furthermore, the reliable relationship between WM capacity and fluid intelligence was exclusively supported by the number factor (r = .66), while the resolution factor made no reliable contribution (r = −.05). Thus, the relationship between WM capacity and standard measures of fluid intelligence is mediated by the number of representations that can be simultaneously maintained in WM rather than by the precision of those representations.

Trans. obsession (resolution) counts for nothing.

https://www.livescience.com/g00/6519-simple-memory-test-predicts-intelligence.html

The high-functioning part is not IQ, it is the ability to live alone and work.

As in, not be functionally disabled.

Back to Aspergers and personality disorders.
If we study it directly –

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51551726_Personality_disorders_and_autism_spectrum_disorders_What_are_the_connections

Fifty-four young adults with a clinical diagnosis of Asperger syndrome were assessed with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II disorders to evaluate the presence of a concomitant personality disorder and completed the Autism Spectrum Quotient to measure level of autistic features. Autism spectrum diagnosis was confirmed by Diagnostic Interview for Social and Communication Disorders with a collateral informant. Approximately half of the study group fulfilled criteria for a personality disorder, all belonging to cluster A or C.

Next control for malingering because

Participants fulfilling criteria for a personality disorder showed more marked autistic features according to the Autism Spectrum Quotient. 

That is highly unlikely.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184447

Similar to ASC, BPD patients have elevated autistic traits and a strong drive to systemize, suggesting an overlap between BPD and ASC.

I am shocked.

Article over for titular purposes. Stay after dark if you’re hardcore.

Warning: this is random and only partially serious. The data is real.

*drum roll*

Magical mystery p-value tour!

Onto murder! The ultimate in violence!

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/my-life-aspergers/201212/asperger-s-autism-and-mass-murder

Reporters are saying the killer had Asperger’s Syndrome, a form of autism.  Every time a news story does that – by tying “killer” and “Asperger’s” in the same sentence – they are at some level implying that there is a connection between autism and mass murder.

There’s not.

Statisticians have a phrase for this situation:  Correlation does not imply causation.

Like Prozac suicides? Thanks, guy with Aspergers, for telling us objectively how safe you are.
http://www.autism.org.uk/about/what-is/pda.aspx Includes compulsive lying.

https://autism-help.org/behavior-manipulative-autism.htm

Please understand if I don’t take your word for it, it’s like asking a fat person how much they ate.

Let me just google it and see if there’s any news.
Since observational studies count and we need an example.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/family-autistic-girl-murdered-teen-11258478

The murder of a teenage girl by a fellow care home resident obsessed by necrophilia could have been prevented, an inquiry has found.

Yes, direct infusions of lead are very preventative.

Melissa Mathieson, 18, was strangled by Jason Conroy in 2014 at Alexandra House in Bristol, a home supporting people with autistic spectrum disorder.

Conroy, who once tried to strangle a teacher so he could abuse her, planned to drag the teenager’s body back to his room and have sex with her.

He had also attempted to kill his mother by putting a duvet over her head for the same reason.

That’s three victims attempted minimum.
Why are creepy rapists and killers not raising any eyebrows when they’re white? Anyone?

About the statistical significance requirement…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/05/21/study-finds-significant-portion-of-mass-murderers-and-serial-killers-had-neurological-disorders-including-autism/

Murderers are crazy and water is wet.

new study in the journal Aggression and Violent Behavior will likely fuel the debate even more. It found some mass murderers and serial killers have something in common: autism and head injury. Like Lanza, other killers had an inability to connect socially, spoke in flat monotones, and had emotionless features.

Researchers call it the first review of published accounts of what causes people to commit mass murder. They said: “Our findings tentatively indicate that these extreme forms of violence may be a result of a highly complex interaction of biological, psychological and sociological factors and that, potentially, a significant proportion of mass or serial killers may have had neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder or head injury.”

Since you can’t rehab these people, where is the hangman?
The necrophilia man will be released. Before his 30th birthday.

The director of the United Kingdom’s National Autistic Society’s Centre for Autism reacted to the study with caution. “We would urge people not to jump to conclusions about people with autism and to make judgements about a whole section of society,”

because we want to keep the gravy train a-chugging and we’re completely objective.

Nonetheless, “the findings were surprising,” researcher Allely, who holds a PhD in psychology, said in a phone interview. “There was a higher percentage of autism [among serial killers] than in the general population.”

Maybe don’t blame the meds just yet.

The research examined a population of 239 killers who had murdered at least three people since 1985, when there was a dramatic increase in the recognition of autism. Of that number, 133 of the mass killers did not appear to suffer from any neurological disorder, but a “significant proportion” did: 28 percent had “definite, highly probable or possible” autism, while 21 percent had sustained a “definite or suspected head injury.” 

28% is well above the required level of significance.

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223980.2016.1175998

The irrationality of this paper merits inclusion alone.

How much is it a factor? BUT It isn’t real BUT it could be BUT it is.

Data!

There are 73 mass shooting events but there are two events where there is a pair of shooters which meant that 75 mass shooter cases were investigated. This exercise tentatively suggests evidence of ASD in six of 75 included cases (8%) which is about eight times higher when compared to the prevalence of ASD found in the general population worldwide (motherjones.com). The 8% figure for individuals with ASD involved mass killings is a conservative estimate. In addition to the six cases which provide the 8% figure, there were 16 other cases with some indication of ASD. Crucially, ASD may influence, but does not cause, an individual to commit extreme violent acts such as a mass shooting episode.

Influence without a cause people.

That makes complete sense.

I am sold with buttons on.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16604294

Nothing to see.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4710161/

No misdiagnosis, no Siree.

It’s a risk, but don’t be worried.

There’s a built-in excuse that they’re not really stalking you because you’re their “obsessive interest”, don’t be concerned, women.
http://www.wtsglobal.com/autism-spectrum-disorder-and-violence/

He didn’t realize when he should not bring up his interest in murder. He might fall into the category of the “incompetent suitor” on the Stalking Risk Profile assessment guide12 – usually harmless but causing genuine concern and requiring limit setting. Legal consequences could follow if the behaviors persist. When given feedback these individuals may be confused, feel frustrated, hurt, or remorseful. Their genuine social naïveté may be apparent to evaluators. In this case the student received ongoing psycho-education and coaching about proper conduct so as to minimize the risk of impulsive outbursts if rebuffed and frustrated, and to reduce the likelihood of others reacting negatively. His progress and conduct continued to be appropriately monitored. A comprehensive risk assessment and explanation to campus officials avoided his being perceived and treated as a potential homicidal stalker.

As a woman, fuck no.

I’m not responsible for some random’s sexual entitlement.

If only we had a technical term for this acknowledged with a link to Aspergers cases.

Click to access A-Conceptual-Analysis-of-Individuals-with-an-Autism.pdf

Homicidal ideation is that term.

“They made the decision to use violence as a means of resolving their issues”

It goes on to discuss premeditation and planning. Nothing like a psychopath, clearly.

https://treato.com/Autism,Homicidal+Ideation/?a=s

That includes discussing murder in slavish detail.

Click to access CARD_ASDMH_Brochure092109.pdf

page 3

Immediately refer to a trained professional
any student who screens positive
for suicidal or homicidal ideation.

If only we had a study

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0306624X15612719?journalCode=ijoe

Five cases of young Italian men with Asperger syndrome and recurrent and extremely violent femicide fantasies are presented. While there is no direct correlation between autism spectrum conditions and violence, as other humans, persons with an autistic condition are capable of committing crimes, including homicide. All five had in common a number of characteristics and behaviors felt to be pathoplastic: All had been bullied, all had been romantically rejected, all were long-standing First Person Shooter (FPS) game players, and all were avid violent pornography consumers.

Wow it’s like the average MGTOW or MRA forum.
I need a study on that.

Because the adequate, mature response to No is murder and necrophilia.
These people are the reason feminists still hold sway over the population.
If they disappeared, there’d be nothing to oppose. People who see you as subhuman because they want to fuck you? Probably not firing on all cylinders themselves.
Psychology is dark and if you disagree and haven’t read enough.

Not respecting the humanity of the person saying No – proves them correct to reject you (you’re unsuitable) and gives First World Feminism something to point at. Congratulations, you’re stupid on multiple levels.

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/recovering-narcissist/2017/09/are-male-narcissists-also-misogynists/

Bitchier than gay men.

Are male narcissists more likely to be misogynistic?study suggests that heterosexual narcissistic men tended to lash out more often at heterosexual women than any other group (including homosexual men and women). Dr. Keiller (2010), lead author of the study, writes:

The present study suggests that heterosexual men’s narcissism is linked to an adversarial and angry stance toward heterosexual women more than toward other groups. Although narcissists may want to maintain feelings of superiority and power over all people, narcissistic heterosexual men are particularly invested in subordinating heterosexual women.

Of course they can’t cooperate, low empathy. They’re broken so they project it and act out. Projection is aggressive.

  • There is an established connection between misogynistic attitudes towards women and homicide against women (Campbell, 1981).

Duh?

Many male mass murderers have also been shown to have a history of domestic violence against women.

They’d call that training.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/resolution-not-conflict/201511/narcissism-or-aspergers-how-would-you-diagnose-these-cases

It is narcissistic to feel entitled to attention from others, including sexual attention. Stop being a whore.

It is narcissistic (specifically solipsistic) to assume your problem should be (other person’s) problem e.g. Women You Wanna Fuck.
This Venn is oddly irrational from the supposed High IQ overlords. They have no problem rejecting women they don’t want to fuck personally, and expect this is their solemn right to do so – but crudely, harshly and without comeuppance. Because female entitlement is the only problem?
The strangest aspect of these femicide rampages is how they believe it makes their ’cause’ appear worthy.

What cause?

Misogyny can be manifested in numerous ways, including social exclusionsex discriminationhostility,

androcentrismpatriarchymale privilege,

that line tough to define

belittling of women, violence against women, and sexual objectification.

Bolded is the stuff they can’t really deny. None of those are prosocial. All of those bolded are evil, as in, they do not occur in a healthy, high-trust society. You have no intellectual philosophy, there is no cause. You don’t even use scientific terms like hypergamy or philosophical solipsism correctly.

We know you’re worthless r-types. Fuck it or kill it or both, we knew. It’s your reason for existence, your raison d’être. How deranged must you be to possibly think that makes you look good? Cavemen were more civilized, we have forensic evidence. You’re not reconnecting with anything. Ancient men weren’t monsters, in sum. What, like women aren’t going to take even more precautions from anyone who vaguely blips on our creepdar? How do you think empathetic people, including normal women, work?

They’ll be more scared – they say on their forums, with the narc’s gleeful thought at another’s suffering.

….Will this result in less sex and a worse reputation or the reverse?

Nobody will ever respect you because you have never ever earned it.
There is no Man Card, you are not auto-worthy of respect because phallic symbol? Freud would’ve laughed you out of the room. It’s individual, it has nothing to do with sex. You earn respect, not your sex for you. That’s such a passive feminine way of looking at it too. More than feminine, effete, it’s perverted femininity. Like the gay pride people who humiliate themselves and still expect you’ll respect them after viewing the assless studded leather chaps in public.
What is going on over there, America? You used to be cool. Now you’re famous for these morons.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201710/new-way-understand-the-narcissistic-male

You choose to be grandiose and act like a loser (psychopaths are not cool IRL).
You’ll meet their fate.

Bible called it;

The LORD tests the righteous and the wicked, And the one who loves violence His soul hates.

For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption

Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.

As I have seen, those who plow iniquity and sow trouble reap the same.

I guess you could call it karma too.

Coddling them is inappropriate, they know what they’re doing and enjoy hurting others, especially wider abstract society. They fully deserve all they get, in that case.
Outsiders get no sympathy.

‘Member hostility in that misogyny list?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/insight/201011/bad-karma-is-real

 The reason they do is that chronic hostility causes both a constriction of the arteries and more blood being pumped to the heart, causing small tears in the arteries. Cholesterol and fat then attach to those tears, which can ultimately cause heart attacks [1]. Chronic hostility also has been linked to long-term elevations in white blood cells, which has been clearly associated with heart disease [2].

In a fascinating study, researchers followed the health of a group of medical students for 25 years to see if their levels of angry hostility at the beginning of the study could predict their heart disease rates down the road [3]. Incredibly, those participants who were highest in angry hostility at the beginning were 5 times more likely than their laid-back counterparts to have heart disease 25 years later.

Type As are not alpha, they’re just dead.

http://www.apa.org/monitor/2013/10/karma.aspx

Social reciprocity outweighs any posturing dominance bullshit.
It’s almost like being selfish is stupid in a social species?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androcentrism

There’s far more evidence for male bias, isn’t there? As in, there is actually evidence, unlike gynocentrism, which clutches at straws with rhetoric and emotional appeal.

 

Sex and the Narcissist – 2 flavours

The porn addict

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/narcissism/2016/08/sex-the-narcissist-sadism-pt-1/

The manwhore

https://blogs.psychcentral.com/narcissism/2016/08/sex-the-narcissist-sex-addict-pt-2/

I have nothing to add, really.
The former is more likely a male borderline, in my opinion.

It’s about controlling the other person, hurting them, whether it’s setting one-sided ‘rules’ (that make no sense) or defiling them (usually more religious, actually, Madonna/Whore idealization/devaluation at play).

It’s popular to say rape is about power. It isn’t, it’s about pleasure. Sadistic pleasure.

Consensual sex is a power exchange.

Update: The second category isn’t purely a sociopathic thing.
For the second category that isn’t a predator but instead compulsive and lacking in fulfillment, self-control etc…

“Earlier research revealed that 87% of sex addicts were raised in emotionally neglectful families (Carnes, 1998).”
“Generally, sex addiction is an attachment disorder, meaning that the addict is unable to connect with themselves or others, and these patterns were learned in childhood from emotionally neglectful or abusive caregivers.”
from https://blogs.psychcentral.com/childhood-neglect/2017/07/what-no-one-ever-told-you-about-sex-addiction/

I seemed harsh because I was referring to the sexual predators that plague both sexes.
People with real issues need help, professional help.

A shrink on sexual harassment “can’t you take a compliment?”

It’s odd how men will admit women are sensitive about their appearance then continue to attack us on it.

Yeah, that’s bullying. Even in school, that is not flirting.

A delightful, common sense explanation.

In before autism;

If you DON’T ‘believe’ in sexual harassment – go to a gay bar on a Saturday.

See how long you last.

That is a woman’s life.

Men are lecherous pigs, regardless of sexuality. What does a lecherous woman look like? A man.

Since any reading this and disbelieving are cowards, simply ask every woman you know and care about (assuming any stuck around you) about their experiences. There are always experiences, regardless of ‘age’ and seeming ‘fuckability’. Don’t talk over them excusing it, just ask the question, shut up and listen.

Actually, 9/10 male rudeness is the inability to shut up and listen. There are studies.

OT Rape accusations imply guilt. A totally honest man needn’t fear them.

https://www.jeunesepayne.co.uk/single-post/2016/11/07/Sexual-Harassment-%E2%80%9CCan%E2%80%99t-you-take-a-compliment%E2%80%9D

“When someone shouts across the street at me “show us your cunt”, or even just wolf-whistles, it’s not because they think it’s going to make me feel good.

It’s a reminder that they could overpower and attack you. R-types don’t care for rule of law, Ks are respectful (either ignoring you in public or getting introductions the decent way).
I saw a very right-wing blog post an article about how the author could easily rape any woman he likes.
In quite graphic detail and practically frothing at the prospect. I don’t read that blog anymore.
This was supposed to scare us all straight (and into agreement with him).

Rape isn’t funny to women, it appalls us (ESPECIALLY the conservative ones), it’s worse than murder. Imagine getting castrated, male power stripped and stolen. Rape is worse for women, at the very least for the conception aspect. A man joking about rape is an r-type trying to pass for K (strong). Those are the worst.

When women see a man seriously laugh (not from shock, but enjoyment) at domestic abuse or whatever sexual ‘prank’ is going on, it would be like watching a woman laughing at a man gored on barbed wire in WW1. Our thought is always the same: what if that were me?

This is why women choose compassion in mate selection studies.

Which sex has the blacker humour?

“Can’t you take a joke?”

Is civilization a joke? They make me wonder.

This is why the right wing’s reputation suffers. Manwhores cosplaying Patriarchy. They seem to think it means concubines and slavery, rather than monogamy and industry.

As for the genuine conservatives…

If they can’t fuck it or kill it, they’re probably going to insult it.

It’s not a well-intended or genuine interaction. They’re not even under some misguided impression that such comments will make me want to have sex with them.

Some are truly that stupid.

Thought process as follows:

If I make her hate me, it’ll remind her of my mother/her father.

Presuming all fathers are incompetent (r-selected) as his. Another layer of insult.

Resent women? No! I simply happen to crush and abandon them all by sheer coincidence!
Distrust women? Sure! They made me leave them! Projection’s only real when women do it!

It’s simply an exertion of power. The aim is to get approval or laughter from others, and discomfort or gratitude from me.

That is better known as sadism.

It is caused by degenerate media, especially the supernormal stimuli of HD streaming online porn.
I guarantee you 100% of those males are porn addicts, the female leches too. The testosterone has to go somewhere, they lack the impulse control (hypofrontality) and time preference to do something good with it.

A compliment is something you would feel comfortable giving a man, woman, or child because you believe it would make them feel good. You’re not boosting anyone’s self-esteem by reminding them that, by society’s standards, “you look acceptable enough for me to fuck”.”

There is always the insult that your primary value is whether they’d use you as their whore.

They’re calling you a whore.

That’s what no woman will admit.

You’re soliciting women on the street. As a whore. But at least whores can charge.

They refuse to accept they’re being rude but they wouldn’t say it if children were present. They desperately want attention but project this onto the provocateur (and looking good isn’t an excuse for anything, is it?) although differing tastes apply, so you can’t even hide your attractiveness since they’ll always be someone Into That. [cough pervert cough]
In conclusion, blame porn. Speaking to people like that (a whore) might not even be acceptable in a purely sexual, private interaction. If they’re smart, they’d leave immediately. It’s demeaning, dehumanizing and morally bankrupt, like the source.

Provocateur is a word I use deliberately… it’s never applied to men, is it?
There’s no such thing as Adam Teasing and Taharrush ‘games’ go after… which sex?

Misandrist women avoid men but misogynistic men seek out women.

Hello, the bulk of MGTOW.

They seek women out to punish them [1]  for what is perceived (projection) as the other’s wrongdoing. It’s never them, never examine the self!!!

Sexual predators, sexual sadism.

I guess womb envy comes into it somewhere but mention that after they play the feminist ‘Penis Envy’ record for the millionth time and suddenly the concept might be shaky? [SJWs lie, r-types lie, logic is a lie to them, thinking is K]

1 Who are you? You can’t lose the chub and get a good job, get out of anyone’s face. At least join a church or Greeenpeace or something. A useful Crusade.

I know, I know.

“Yes, but –

What about men?”

…What about the men?

Where are the men when this happens? [2]

Women exist, women are the fair sex. Women will be sexually harassed as long as we live. Men need to police other men, we certainly can’t.

Think too of the racial and class angles.

Is this acceptable as a way to treat people in the first world?

2

Sign of an r-type male: when you defend a woman from attack (and attack it is), you get accused of White Knighting. Yes, but White Knights are a good thing (Ks) and protect other Ks from monsters…

They never speak to men that way, knowing the odds of an altercation. Cowards to boot. Sexual competition makes the rabbit flee. At times, they’ll use the term incorrectly (in defense of another r) as a compliment of her sexual quality (lie) to get her into bed. It uses triangulation, the common manipulation tactic. Are those men crazy? Probably male borderline, it’s under-diagnosed. It would explain their romantic or intimacy issues that can be masked socially to some extent. R-types fear intimacy because it leads to responsibility and commitment, turn-offs. R/K does neatly align with attachment conditions (anxious-avoidant, secure)…. with the Mother (Freud wins).

Another sign “why are women so easily offended?” [3]

Only the ones around you.

Hm.

Yes, it’s definitely us…

all three billion of us, currently. And they say women can’t do maths?

3

Prelude to gaslighting, All women are crazy bullshit. Pathologizing a problem makes it go away!

See also the classic “why won’t women-” do whatever Lord Fauntleroy wants?

Narcissistic entitlement brewing up to rage. Histrionic, effete rage.

Porn tastes slay orientation theory

https://www.indy100.com/article/sexuality-porn-gay-straight-homosexual-heterosexual-viewing-data-statistics-survey-7510826

It made sense for biology, to explain behaviour. It’s Darwinian, to reproduce or not.

Now it’s become an excuse to be all talk, “I identify” so you have bizarre findings like this, and ‘heterosexual men’ also dubbed ‘Men Who Have Sex With Men’.