Gen Y error correction

Millennials are so SJW because they think they stand to gain £££££££.

When the promises of the Left prove false, such as home ownership, stable work and retirement….

A sea change wouldn’t describe it, tsunami might.

We’re completely self-indulgent but it’s a secondary effect of generational depression.
Gen X were angry, we’re depressed, Z are apathetic.

A+ comment

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/labour-is-pro-rape-party.html#c1856572517632337420

“I’m a millennial, metaphorically I feel the moral corruption of my generation, whispering to me that I should just fuck bitchez and leave well enough alone, that I’ll never succed as a tradionalist, that I’ve fucked enough bitchez and can’t possibly marry, it’s hypocritical of me to support traditional marriage or heteronormativity. If I believed in demons, I would say the sexual immorality we were all but taught in school by the boomers is one.

I know that other millennials would be with us if they didn’t have easy access to genz pussy on tinder, and others would be with us if they didn’t see ideas as separate from their personal lives / see the path of redemption as hypocrisy.”

The degeneracy isn’t just killing people individually, it’s killing their futures collectively.
Enabled by people who detest them as Straight, White Males.
Now, what do you offer a Straight White Male to destroy himself, since you can’t do it yourself?
The Sexual Revolution. It ruined men.
Until that problem is addressed and acknowledged and well-known, the exploitation of man’s greatest weakness, then all the crying about universal suffrage is a red herring. There isn’t a single “right-wing” man I’ve seen online that isn’t as “Sex Positive” as the most virulent SJW. That’s why we’ve lost. Bacchus isn’t Jesus, it’s Satanic.

Postmodernism, any modernism, can only be defeated by a return to tradition, but the men are too weak.
They’re all too weak now.

From thinking with their dicks, worse than any case of PMS.
PMS never killed a race.

Man on twitter thinks he can re-write history

Seriously, a random guy who clearly reads a lot of Reddit and wikipedia.

History is his hobby. People are actually impressed.

This is top article on a popular site.

https://www.indy100.com/article/nazi-socialist-right-wing-white-supremacists-history-twitter-mikestuchbery-7900001

It’s such a loaded way they phrase it, so black and white.
Like politics of closing a century ago would be anything like ours?

Instead of acknowledging the political grey of the time (the Nazis had a combination of ‘wing’ policies, but were appealing mainly to the working class, tipping them into socialist thanks to the results of WW1 spreading poverty everywhere*) he literally tries to claim they were just using the word socialist without actually meaning socialist.

OK.

Like people would join a socialist party, and then stay when it opposes everything they stand for?

Sure Jan.*who doesn’t know Weimar Germany’s condition of extreme poverty, that everyone knows in this country.
You need to rebuild after all your infrastructure and assets are stripped.
If they’re nationalized (still a core socialist principle from the Nazis) then it isn’t capitalist or attracting a middle class from overseas?

That’s what words mean, blobby.
They might as well have linked to fucking Tumblr.
That’s exactly where he got this reasoning from, check.
A lot of Reddit comes from the murk of Tumblr.

Basic American illiteracy on European philosophy;

That’s a communist. Primary school children know this.

SJWs always lie.

No….?

Ha!

No, they’re not.

The anti-fascists are a prime example of this.
Violent red assholes.
Was Mao not a fascist?

The imagined mic-dropper is the best part.

You disagree with my totally legitimate historical opinion?

You stupid or evil!

This is why you don’t let idiots read history, they cannot actually read.
The postmodern can’t be anything else. It’s actually sad, they don’t understand anything that isn’t modernism. If they aren’t smashing up sandcastles they don’t understand, they cry like they’re the injured party. Just because you say a thing, doesn’t make it so.

I apologize for how fucking pathetic my people are.

People you can disprove with a simple ‘No’.

Like ….Burden of Proof, troll.
If they’re different, list the policies and say which is which.

Oh…. but that would show they’re lying!

Because right-wingers care so much about Government jobs, the birth rate, women and the environment!

…What class was Hitler again?

Update: this guy

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/from-nazis-mouth.html

Comic: Traditionalism is the future

“I had a comic I cannot find for the life of me, each generation was passing on a scroll but the 20th century refused it and wrote their own.”

Guess what.

WE HAVE TO GO BACK

As written in Empire and Economics;

the anti-dote to the modern and postmodern cancers is Traditionalism.

There’s no way around this.

The only question left is which form plus details.

America not great but immigrants still attracted? – SJWs Always Lie

Mind cancer typical of Cultural Marxism. Remember, once an idea is in your mind, you can never pluck it out.


Her ancestors had the great societal culture of rice farming and famine, they continue to rip off Western technologies, unable to come up with much themselves. Meritocracy a myth, unless it’s your SAT score. It’s interesting that she describes her own toxic conformity to academic culture. I’m familiar with this.
Liberals hate property rights (r-types are consumers, not producers) and originality (jealousy). Picasso could actually paint, he conned the art market with crap and got a laugh out of it. It started off as one big joke involving a urinal. They were literally taking the piss.


Liberals distort epistemology, mis-perceive or falsely convey the labels of symbology as the symbols they distinguish and deny empiricism or objective fact-testing in definitions. e.g. Geometry is a settled science, not up for debate or opinion. Feelings like Asch’s lines do not change factual definitions. This is peer pressure and brainwashing under the guise of open-mindedness and ego-boosting (her sickly sweet tone of voice, like speaking to a child). Their brains have fallen out. If they hate labels so much, they should quit coming up with trendy new terms for sexuality, because orientation theory is a gigantic Victorian labelling system. If they hate labels so much, they should quit with the ad hominem: like Hitler, literally Hitler, bigoted, sexist, racist, phobic etc. Or maybe the purpose of language is communication and that requires labels, rather than crazed gesticulation? She likes consensus and conformity, but not the consensus of what a shape is, or the conformity of shapes to objective rules? ~cuckoo noise sounds~


Liars. Not even liberal. I love the part where she says she doesn’t want to dominate the conversation, even though it’s her opinion or you’re wrong, but all opinion counts and also, there is no such thing as truth, in full postmodern trash, so nobody can technically have an opinion regardless.
Cognitive dissonance doesn’t apply to idiots. They don’t flag these as errors.
PC lies by filling the air with nonsense words and hoping you’ll be distracted long enough they can get power over you.


“top-down?” you mean teaching? and that isn’t what top-down means, it’s a processing term based on neuroscience and computer metaphors
Teachers not important in colleges? Really? Authority figures bad? Why are you paid so much?
“Who gets to judge?”
…Experts. People with the facts. Bloody Hell.

Top kek comment: “Wouldn’t this reduce art to propaganda, like Socialist Realism was?”
In one, son.
Also “Bombastic nonsense. Epistemology has nothing to do with politics; sjws are trying to look cleverer than their content normally allows by appropriating philosophical terminology.”
Stealing. The term is stealing.

Philosophy and science are apolitical because they align with the brutal, unvarnished, inconvenient truth, not the specific groups of people with vested interests.

Critical theory is a nag. A whiner. All it does is complain, it cannot create anything new. It attacks everything but in failing to have positive assertions, it is impossible to falsify itself. It is purely destructive and intends to divide people and sweep up power in the chaos. These people can’t come up with new words at least, they must pinch those from other topics and abuse them.