Well she wanted all the same things (legalized)….
1. The age of consent for sexual acts must be lowered to 12 years old.
“Eliminate the phrase ‘carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years’ and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense… A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.” (p. 102)…
Prostitution must be legalized: it is not sufficient to change the law to sex-neutral language.
“Prostitution proscriptions are subject to several constitutional and policy objections. Prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (p. 97) “Retaining prostitution business as a crime in a criminal code is open to debate. Reliable studies indicate that prostitution is not a major factor in the spread of venereal disease, and that prostitution plays a small and declining role in organized crime operations.” (p. 99)
“Current provisions dealing with statutory rape, rape, and prostitution are discriminatory on their face… There is a growing national movement recommending unqualified decriminalization [of prostitution] as sound policy, implementing equal rights and individual privacy principles.” (pp. 215-216)
4. The Mann Act must be repealed; women should not be protected from “bad” men.
[coughs in Rotherham]
“The Mann Act . . . prohibits the transportation of women and girls for prostitution, debauchery, or any other immoral purpose. The act poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates. . . . It was meant to protect from the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ *those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . . The act was meant to protect weak women from bad men.” (pp. 98-99)
they’re trying to feed this Cultural Marxist push to MGTOW now “legalize enslaving white women by (((pimps))) because muh gynocentrism” it’s just the same anti-white push as before
I can’t believe they’re openly trying – muh fellow conservative supreme gentlemen, sell your genetic future to predatory Jews as a legal transaction! for the good of your reproductive future!
If they enslave white women it WON’T be for white men, and then with nobody to reproduce with we all die, no death camps for white men necessary. There is no end to the global slave demand for white women and children (boys too).
It’s a special kind of stupid. Single people shouldn’t get to Vote on children’s issues. No Vote unless married with kids.
AC comments on his blog link:
You don’t just begin by chance happening to intellectually seek to turn back every law that makes sex trafficking of children illegal.
MGTOW is controlled ops now, it’s so obvious.
But muh did Epstein do anything wrong?
You begin thinking sex trafficking of children is a good thing you want legalized, (or you are told to defend it) and you then construct arguments for why each aspect of it is morally right, and should not be illegal.
Ginsburg’s problem may be she was a part of something which she now wants to legalize and make moral in her own mind for her own sanity. Or she has evidence out there that her positions were dictated to her by some conspiracy.
Already covered this, Jan 12, 2019-
Oh look, I pre-dated Q…. again.
A year and 9 months ahead is probably a personal record. #goodhairdontcare
Cabal shill about me: “I’d rather piss off Satan than that woman“. #stillnotdead
re ‘consents’, pedos and other rapists know it’s impossible to prove a negative
LOGICALLY, CONSENT IS NOT AN ARGUMENT
I’ve heard of ‘care home’ experimentation in this country, wouldn’t surprise me.