The voice of middle-class white males

This is really about men, he doesn’t really mean white women.

All he does is call white guys oppressed.

Middle-class American white males.

That is literally all he does.

The men who live like Kings compared to world history.

Men need useful role models, not shrinks! Give me a soldier, a sailor, a candle-stick maker! All more useful than him! The Elon Musk fandom is less obnoxious.

They bring up COAL MINERS. Yes, that is totally valid to 99.99% of the modern male population, you poor little pussy.

Shrinks see people as defective. Obviously he doesn’t believe his paying customers have privilege, or they wouldn’t want him to fix them!

It might as well be: Horse-drawn carriage salesman debunks automobiles!

If they feel genuinely good about themselves, it’s game over for him. He needs you DEPENDENT.

He doesn’t even acknowledge that men are privileged in many respects, biologically.

No, I don’t mean IQ because the variance is too high and if you don’t exclude poor men, like academia does (studying themselves), they’re slightly below women.

They have greater lung capacity, handy for endurance.

Greater upper body strength, better for self-defense.

Their brain can focus better but modern habits pollute this.

They’re more likely to get hired or considered competent at work, even if they dress up.

They attract fewer stalkers and are less likely to be drugged at a bar.

If they’re friendly, it’s less likely seen as flirty.

They don’t listen to that of course. After all, it never happened to them. Because they’ve never been a woman.

Bitch Shield is just “please don’t think I’m flirting” mode.

Ugly men get away with a lot more socially than ugly women. Ugly men are not told to alter their expectations at all and this gives them license to behave badly. Many don’t even know they’re ugly.

They’re taken more seriously in their opinions (another invisible one). I go anonymous online all the time so yes it’s very much a thing, start a fake female account (just the name like Gigi) and post the same opinions (avoid one topic: not about the sexes) and random ‘actually’ men will suddenly start nitpicking what is literally common sense compared to if you’re called something uniquely male like Greg, when they’ll be friendly. Calling a woman stupid is not attractive to us but they do not get this. Be prepared to be called “bitch” and “cunt” a lot too, in lieu of rebuttal. They’ll do this while admitting women are more sensitive and should be treated delicately (idiots). It’s called ‘dick move’ for this reason. They can be civil and logical – they just don’t want to. It’s male PMS.

Sizes are typically based on men and fit male waists.

Clinical trials are almost entirely men and medications are designed to work well for them (lower risk of dying).

Anatomy diagrams are typically male and models too. It’s obvious when you look at the torso, rib cage and heart size especially.

Should they feel bad about these differences when not explicitly chosen? NO.

And that’s the difference. We just want to be treated fairly on many counts (like perceived competence for the same work). We want to be on their level, the higher level.

White privilege exists too, I’d choose to be born with that cultural birthright because it’s amazing.

The difference is you don’t self-loathe based on something you were born.

One reason we hate multiculturalism is that non-whites tend to oppress us for being white in our homelands and we have no homeland to be privileged in anymore. It’s like living in a foreign colony of Europe instead of the real thing. They have theirs, it’s still there and they can return to it, we just want ours. It’s the defining (social capital) quality of homeland as a legal right that we enjoy in-group privilege on it as natives. So they try to shame you about that same thing.

And it doesn’t mean the non-whites are owed anything or can (ironically) use it as excuse to dehumanize you.

I see so often with Peterson disciples this cognitive dissonance

“Men don’t have any privilege because (anecdote or twisted irrelevant detail)”

(note: no biology)

“Well, men are just better, it’s science” (and they mean biology, despite it not working like that)

Even within men, their biological differences vary.

Regular soldier? More muscle, the better.

Sniper, someone who needs stealth? That’ll harm you.

It’s like they formulated this guy’s bit in the lab.

“But what about men?” like that’s a new line, come now

the constant implications of “…They’re so oppressed.” Well they’re hardly in death camps, are they? It’s so shrill. It’s the most spoiled incarnation of oppression I’ve ever seen. Like poor people or white people in general don’t suffer more, it’s obscene in its obliviousness. Are they being trafficked into sex slavery?

Okay, hypothetically let’s say they were, but then if that’s inherent (because it’s implied nothing can be done to fully remedy this) then that’s calling an entire sex inferior and again, not how biology works. Humans are dimorphic because we need both qualities, it’s apples and oranges.

Still, we’re stuck on fallacies of irrelevance (actually, men are more likely to get sole custody when they request it than women, MRAs lie about their data all the time and get butthurt if you point it out) and category errors (men and women aren’t meant to be the same).

If you’re gonna be a broken record on a topic, actually say something.

Don’t just complain or dismiss. Put forth new material.

He never does this, he absorbs other people’s points like a black hole.

He’s a debate Hydra. If the journalists asked him neutral questions, he’d have nothing to spin.

Replace girls with guys and same applies here.

Seeming smarter than stupid journalists is NOT intelligence, is it?

They don’t give a damn about poor men and use them like a rhetorical shiv while they sit all comfy behind their keyboards sipping shitty Starbucks coffee. Sex traitors, classist bastards.

If Peterson were so oppressed, he’d be fired. Most billionaires would be women. Most politicians would be women. Sanitary products wouldn’t be considered a luxury. Female comedians would joke about raping men and tell them to get over it, like that crime is a guaranteed laughriot. The list goes on. Research if your point is simple to debunk before making a fool of yourself because men (as a group) have many advantages and some of them are biological.

That is what privilege means.

The SJW twists this by making it into a paradigm of shame like original sin but usually it has nothing to do with women (more biology side) and Peterson is using the SJW paradigm of white guilt. This is notable.

He encourages your laziness. White men aren’t great, are they? You could say they ain’t shit.

Don’t bother being proud of your forefathers or civilization.

Don’t take action, healthy message. Especially in the West today. Don’t improve things for your people, like all the great white people of history, you aren’t privileged but you really don’t need to be, he implies. Because he believes in the experiment of multiculturalism – the slowest civil war.

Belief and Moore’s paradox

I saw someone point out that PC is mostly Moore’s paradox denying reality.

In case you want to read on the topic of Moore’s paradox.

Click to access SPAWN.pdf

“As Alex Byrne (2005) puts the point, our epistemic access to our own beliefs is both “peculiar” and “privileged”.”

I’d relate this to thought-terminating cliche.

Video: Corbyn lovers

This is the champion of the working-class party in the UK, our GE is tomorrow.

The people who hate IQ never want to ban grades, I said naively.
All grades are based on the psychological construct of ‘g’, better known as IQ.
The middle class introduce all these policies on purpose to reduce social mobility in the working class competition, to kick them and keep them down, to preserve their own position, their own privilege.

Why is Labour dead with the WWC?

The middle class cunts like this.

~mic drop~
The Inadequate Personality Disorder description in DSM-II included ineffectual responses to any physical, intellectual, social, or emotional demands placed on the individual. Despite the lack of any real physical or intellectual deficits, these patients appear poorly adapted to their environment, are inept, have poor judgment, are socially unstable, lack physical and emotional stamina, and chronically cannot cope with everyday stress and strain. Detailed, behaviorally specific criteria were not provided for any of the disorders in DSM-II.”

Meanwhile, I still have to explain the acronym of the very people they claim to represent and support.

White skin privilege

“In reality, they had plenty, and not just in Europe. ‘White slavery’ today means the international trafficking of women for prostitution. Back then, it meant the provisioning of the Muslim world with European concubines, who were valued for their white skin (Lewis, 1990, pp. 11-13, 56, 72). This trade was considerable in Muslim Spain:”

Slavery has always (9/10) been about sex.
Which color of woman has been most ‘popular’ sexually?

Video: 5 signs you’re a regressive Leftist

They use the term Right to describe conservatives, so Leftist is more suitable, plus, they aren’t liberal. They’re bigots and fascists (they want to ban other opinions and control everyone, respectively). Bigots want to brainwash everyone into their faith (it’s a cult) and censor everyone who doesn’t convert.

Social engineering is the PC term for fascism. You will be a pig in their ‘social experiment’.

Remember, SJWs always lie, and they use the insults that would stick to them.

Regressive is a cultural thing, it doesn’t get to the White-hating demographic genocide heart of the beast. Useful meme but we need better.

5. You’re against freedom of speech. Hate speech is the tool of tyrants suppressing dissent in a legal gulag.
4. You’re extremely racist and bigoted. ‘Privilege’ is a form of mystical possession that comes with having the right to live in a country because your ancestors built it. “The soft bigotry of low expectations”, hmm.
3. Your arguments aren’t arguments. They work in thought-terminating cliches, emotional appeals and ad hominem. “Heretic, sorry, wrong century, hate speech!” they cry, piously.
2. You like banning things. They believe in the Devil, it’s you. They believe in God, it’s them. Everything they want is Righteous. They are self-righteous narcissists.
1. You deny reality. That is psychotic. That is insane. No, literally, the definition of psychotic. They don’t recognise it and act as if nothing happened, or as if their fantasy world is the real one. Narcissist rage awaits correction by people or reality. Tabula rasa started as philosophy, it’s used as pseudoscience.

These people are generally privileged middle class crybabies bullying other people to feel less incompetent in the world. They have a huge classist chip on their shoulder and hate themselves. This is the face of the Middle Class with a chip on its shoulder. The chattering class started barking orders because WW2 killed the upper class hegemony.

Link: How Bad Are Things?

On the Privilege of Thinking You Can Judge Someone’s Life by Appearances

Sociopaths are incapable of true empathy.

Let that sink in. They’ll say they care but do something else.

You can tell them all about someone’s suffering and they’ll still treat it like a competition.

Having it All is a Middle Class Myth

They don’t seem to have noticed how middle-class they are, these female authors telling us that we can have our children, a full-time job, and love it.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I am all for women having careers if they want to. We need female doctors, teachers, shopkeepers, cleaners, you name it, to keep our society human. Nor am I against the middle-class. I belong there myself. What I do object to is assuming that all women are the same, and that any woman can “have it all” without damage to family and home…

They outsource and have servants. There aren’t enough hours in the day. I’d rather be a poor worker than a poor mother. Mother is a valuable and crucial job itself. It should be respected.

uhuh hmm o really rlly doubt eyebrow flash lara croft

Forgive the dejected tone, I’ve had the stuffing knocked out of me by a combination of work duties, paperwork errors, EU bureaucracy including the CHR (long story), family complaints, friends attention-seeking because it’s summer, the police (not a bad thing), noisy neighbours currently blasting bad techno music, that SCOTUS rainbow crap on social media, a somewhat minor health quibble and another redpill writer channelling Freud at me. Within the past few days.  I am exhausted. I want to curl up in a darkened room and forget the world exists.

It used to be that all working class women were working mothers. They had to be. They’d scoff if told that was a choice or a good thing.

Beauty and Intelligence incredibly linked (same level as education)

In a previous post, I show, using an American sample from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, that physically more attractive people are more intelligent. As I explain in a subsequent post, the association between physical attractiveness and intelligence may be due to one of two reasons. Genetic quality may be a common cause for both (such that genetically healthier people are simultaneously more beautiful and more intelligent). Alternatively, the association may result from a cross-trait assortative mating, where more intelligent and higher status men of greater resources marry more beautiful women….

Mostly the former, as it explains female bequeath too it should be genetic. Assortative mating usually applies to objective attractiveness (the famed 10-scale) for both sexes, skewed relationships rarely last long without something else to make up for the gap.

Regardless of the reason for the association, the new evidence suggests that the association between physical attractiveness and general intelligence may be much stronger than we previously thought.

… Attractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 104.23, whereas unattractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 91.81.  The difference between them is 12.42. This mean difference implies a correlation coefficient of r = .381, which is reasonably large in any survey data…..

Huge IQ bridge, on par with eugenic/dysgenic effects? I’d love to see expanded profiles (marital status at 30, for example).

By pure coincidence, the correlation between physical attractiveness and intelligence in NCDS is exactly the same, down to the third decimal point, as the correlation between intelligence and education. Both correlations are .381. Everybody knows that intelligence and education are very highly correlated. What they don’t know is that physical attractiveness is equally highly correlated with intelligence as education is. 

In other words,

If you want to estimate someone’s intelligence without giving them an IQ test, you would do just as well to base your estimate on their physical attractiveness as you would to base it on their years of education.

oh damn wow ah

I’ll leave these here:

“Privilege” has statistical backing!
The stereotypes, again, are true!

Maybe humans will branch into an Eloi and Morlock scenario? The IQ difference is huge, the SD I calculated for the summary result (both sexes) is 8.78227, population SD is 6.21 with population variance of 38.5641 in IQ. Huge values.

A Comic About Real Privilege

Some genius reworded the comic from to reflect social reality.

Here it is:

The real privilege is others excusing your failure.

ugh why no please stop god kill me now rdj tony stark

Notice how the “hero” in the original had to be a brown girl?

The same people who say

and want to drag EVERYONE down to the lowest common denom.


Why is “check your privilege” popular? Master-suppression techniques and kafkatrapping

I want to put in a recc. for thought-terminating cliche. Which the SJW lot at wikipedia have deleted as a standalone page.

Lifton said:[4][5]

The language of the totalist environment is characterized by the thought-terminating cliché. The most far-reaching and complex of human problems are compressed into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed. These become the start and finish of any ideological analysis.

Kafkatrapping is basically: Your refusal to acknowlege (sin) is proof of (sin) and that is why we condemn you. Yes, history buffs. Witch trial logic. 

It relies on self-hatred and vague evil authorities (cough capitalism)

Sometimes the kafkatrap is presented in less direct forms. A common variant, which I’ll call the Model C, is to assert something like this: “Even if you do not feel yourself to be guilty of {sin,racism,sexism, homophobia,oppression…}, you are guilty because you have benefited from the {sinful,racist,sexist,homophobic,oppressive,…} behavior of others in the system.” The aim of the Model C is to induce the subject to self-condemnation not on the basis of anything the individual subject has actually done, but on the basis of choices by others which the subject typically had no power to affect. The subject must at all costs be prevented from noticing that it is not ultimately possible to be responsible for the behavior of other free human beings.

A close variant of the model C is the model P: “Even if you do not feel yourself to be guilty of {sin,racism,sexism, homophobia,oppression…}, you are guilty because you have a privileged position in the {sinful,racist,sexist,homophobic,oppressive,…} system.” For the model P to work, the subject must be prevented from noticing that the demand to self-condemn is not based on the subject’s own actions or choices or feelings, but rather on an in-group identification ascribed by the operator of the kafkatrap.

It is essential to the operation of all three of the variants of the kafkatrap so far described that the subject’s attention be deflected away from the fact that no wrongdoing by the subject, about which the subject need feel personally guilty, has actually been specified. The kafkatrapper’s objective is to hook into chronic self-doubt in the subject and inflate it, in much the same way an emotional abuser convinces a victim that the abuse is deserved – in fact, the mechanism is identical. Thus kafkatrapping tends to work best on weak and emotionally vulnerable personalities, and poorly on personalities with a strong internalized ethos.

“____ Culture”
and so forth.