Serotonin and sex

http://www.medicinehunter.com/chocolate_love_drug

“Chocolate gets right to the heart of sexual pleasure by increasing the brain’s level of serotonin, the feel-good brain chemical. Serotonin plays a major role in positive mood, emotional health, proper sleep and balanced appetite, contributing to numerous behavioral and physiological functions. Decreased serotonin is a well known factor in cases of depression. Increased brain serotonin promoted by chocolate increases sexual excitation, desire and responsiveness. Women have more serotonin in their systems than men and appear to be more sensitive to chocolate. Chocolate provides a mood boost to women during PMS and menstruation, when serotonin levels are often down. It also puts women in the mood for love. Men and women with depleted serotonin levels demonstrate increased aggressive sexual tendencies, a higher rate of masturbation, and increased promiscuity. Violence, aggressive behaviors, and higher rates of suicide have all been associated with reduced brain levels of serotonin. Many people consume chocolate as a form of self medication, whether they are aware of the fact or not. Chocolate’s serotonin elevating activity helps to modify mood in positive ways and acts as a sexual sweetener. These serotonin-related effects enhance the sense of closeness between lovers.”

I’m not saying anything.

But maybe the swain buying chocolates and flowers are onto something?

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/06/03/flowers-good-for-everyone/

Link: The Trans- Sociopath Overlap

https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2017/07/the-trans-sociopath-overlap.html
For the broader group, personality disorder (1+) would be highly effective.
If they mutilate you, if they torment you – you can’t leave them. Nobody else would have you, as gaslighters put it.
That’s the common reason behind borderlines – being borderlines. They want to damage and depress those around them, to weaken them from leaving.
The nymphomania is pretty indicative of classic psychopathy.
You can tell by someone’s personal life alone whether they’re crazy. Elsewhere, people hide.

Same goes for the ‘gay’ domestic abuse rates, and drug use.
Classic psycho traits. High time preference.
Also, wouldn’t it be a typical narcissist to name themselves ‘happy’?

“As healthcare officials will attest, the biggest problem with mental illness, is the mentally ill don’t think they’re mentally ill and refuse treatment. As long as they can pass an examination that states they aren’t a threat to themselves or society, and aren’t sociopaths gaming the system, then give them their desired “X” for gender on their driver’s license (and if Target wants to spend $20 million to build gender neutral bathrooms in all their stores, that’s their decision, but considering their stock has dropped 25% since the announcement, and during a record high bull market at that, their PR stunt speaks for itself).”
They are all listed in the DSM. It’s literally a disease.
They are also coded in the ICD, which Americans forget about but we have that in Europe.
The D stands for Disease. It is literally correct to say they have a disease.

Narcissists are typified by a rage at happiness.
Naturally, they love any excuse to play victim.
This makes them look good and the good person look bad.

You might call that crazy. Well… yeah. That’s the point.
They’re the human equivalent of an infection. Emotional contagion is a weapon.

They’ll turn up at someone’s birthday party knowing they aren’t welcome.

You could say etiquette exists to isolate them.

In general, those with personality disorders resent the normal, want to destroy and replace the norm, to steal its power for themselves. They can’t run a piss-up in a brewery though, but they can inflict plenty of damage as they take society down with them.

Most have been diagnosed with at least ‘depression’ (*a false effect produced by the low when someone thwarts their precious way or doesn’t allow themselves to be abused) but tend to have rage issues and psychotic symptoms. Some depressive meds are also used as anti-psychotics.

*A depressed person would never use it as emotional blackmail.
An abuser would.

What happens to the body after too much sex?

http://www.ranker.com/list/what-happens-to-your-body-when-you-have-too-much-sex/jacob-shelton

Nobody wants to tell Americans they rank #1 among yearly new STD infections in the First World.
Nobody wants to point out that if you were any good at it, it wouldn’t take so many tries to be satisfied, and being difficult to satisfy is a personal fault, not the partner’s.
On top of this, the health problems are reflected not only in the microbiome and psychiatric damage but also glandular issues, including what’s been called adrenal fatigue. The body should not be exhausted.

There’s another thing I’ve seen no one mention.

In any economic collapse or stressful apocalypse scenarios, the HPV in America alone will flare up right around the time of mass rape, including men-on-men (heterosexuality is a feature of good economic times, desperate people want a buzz if the world is ending and men are more desperate/violent than women). The stressed body is more prone to being infected. HIV is easier to catch with any other STD, and syphilis affects men far more than women. It also causes massive sores, biological madness and parts of your body to rot off including the nose to cave in, so others in any time of economic hardship will avoid you socially like a leper – but worse. Hepatitis is hard to diagnose and treat at the best of times, and an easy killer, especially when the body is malnourished and weak from stress.

I think there is a God because the wages of sin really rack up if you look at the way the world is going.
Chastity and moderation produce the ideal balance of health benefits, but don’t let that stop you.

I’ve also been looking into a piece of brain tissue called the insula and believe it might contain the secret to the differences of degeneracy between r-types and K-types, it rewards lust, assesses arousal and mates, including disgust, and allows the brain to signal it and prefer purity.
Arguably, sexual degenerates (is there any other kind) have a brain-damage specific to their insula.
Nobody’s going to fund that study.
Damage can include funky signalling, it doesn’t need to be a functional equivalent of a watermelon.

If you made your health a priority, you wouldn’t need to sleep around.
You’d feel good naturally. That’s a prime motivator in young people, because sex is seen as cheap/easy/free.
If you made your health a priority, you wouldn’t want to damage it with the risk of oral herpes from random kissing alone. You can technically get HIV from kissing, especially if you’re prone to mouth ulcers. Say, from apocalyptic stress.
Should healthcare really cover the people who demonstrate the self-control of a child?
When did society agree to that in the social contract? Show me the receipts.
Remember, legal consent is technically based on brain maturity. If a finding were to come out about impaired decision-making with biological proof, treatment and testing available, the law could get very interesting.

So too does the candy dispenser of antibiotics to degenerates play the key role in the spread of resistance. MRSA rose with the hook-up culture. Is society right to put children and the elderly at risk, for a lifestyle they didn’t choose?
The social harm is spread out to society, it is antisocial to begin with.
Contrary to popular belief online, ED is a cardiovascular condition, and probably God’s way of saying Don’t chase girls young enough to be your daughter, stop fucking or she’ll give you a heart attack!

Sexual imprinting is very real and likely a major factor in r/K, it might’ve been what Freud was swinging at with the Oedipal Complex. To pair sexual satisfaction with the social experience of people who are rude, mean, cruel, that you don’t care about and never love… must have some kind of sociopathic effect on the brain. It’s behaviourism, you’re training it and the circuits cease to be plastic in the mid-20s, when most people are still fucking around. Again, studies are few and far between but it’ll come out eventually.
Physical intimacy makes emotional intimacy issues worse. That’s known.
It can increase risk of suicide, via depression, a link which hasn’t been studied in the greater prevalence of suicidal men. For PC reasons. Better to let them die than insult them, right? Sex is a natural painkiller, and painkillers work on psychic pain too – including, ironically, loneliness.
SSRIs should be prescribed for many so-called players. Nobody chooses to sleep around because they like themselves. They’d soon perk up and learn normal emotional reactions to those behaviours. The brain when weakened by other addictions like porn that can cause a medical phenomena called hypofrontality (one symptom: weak impulse control and pleasure-seeking) and in effect, this causes you to do stupid things. Things a recovered person would be ashamed of.
Even if you had an addiction to pleasure chemicals, it’d be more effective and better for your reputation to take up a drug habit considering the risks of sleeping around – including the fact at least over half of cancers are pathogenic in aetiology. Sleeping around increases the risk of penile and anal cancers in men… no, they don’t need to do butt stuff for the latter (although anal bacteria from women can be enough) and wearing a condom isn’t responsible enough (HPV). There’s no excuse for sex addiction because it’s a behaviour, at best they’re ‘addicted’ to orgasms, a self-soothing mechanism which can be found in children, especially pre-pubertal boys (you can look it up but your browser history will look… strange). Really, that tension is psychiatric with physiological effects, it is mistaken for sexual tension (arousal) because society programs us and men in particular to hide negative emotions and turn them into positive ones. You could think of it as the male form of hysteria. It is nervous tension throughout the body, they are trying to dispel it, which actually encourages more thanks to stress hormones (cortisol, adrenaline, prolactin, other things that make you fat…) and you know the cliched definition of insanity… How was hysteria ‘treated’? Masturbation.
So once more, there’s no excuse for sleeping around.

There isn’t really much to brag about. There are a number of reasons the ancients looked upon lecherous men with pity and disdain. This is without going into the Peter Pan Syndrome youth problems, prevalent in Gen X ‘guys’ who don’t even want to be addressed as men or Mr.Name but complain about tranny pronouns. Broflakes and their mantrums.

Yeah, that’s hormonal too. Any time you question someone with a behavioural compulsion, especially one reinforced by chemical feedback in the body, an-almost narcissistic rage ensues. If they have NPD or BPD traits, this is rage of Lilith proportions.

About the prolactin, for example. Both sexes excrete it.

You ever notice how many male orgasm fiends have bitch tits?

http://www.nature.com/ijir/journal/v14/n2/full/3900823a.html

How screwing around ruins men for marriage

I’ve pointed out before that women aren’t breeding because men aren’t proposing.

The proposals come first. Sub-replacement fertility extends from sub-replacement marriage rates.

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/theyve-learned-nothing.html#c1952481587955180873

As much as women have to learn (and be taught) how to be wives and mothers again, men have to decide to be husbands and fathers again….”

No binge-drinking, drug-taking, clubbing and promiscuity.
No wonder they’ve yet to act their mumbled Principles.

You’re not a Christian by what you do, you are a Christian by what you don’t do.

“You Nailed It.

My sons grew up with the following:
1. I would pay huge $$$ to prevent a grandchild being aborted.
2. Be careful with whom you “dally.” Making a baby with a bat-shit crazy bitch will cement her crazy in your life forever.
3. Every Damn Thing You Do Becomes A Part Of You! Every girl you bed will leave that memory and you’ll never escape it downstream. What might this look like?
A. Crazy bitches want to put their faces on every orgasm you have for the rest of your life, so sex with them will in all likelihood be the craziest Monkey Sex you can imagine. Then you’ll forever compare sex with subsequent girls (INCLUDING YOUR WIFE) with her technique, and GUESS WHAT? (quoting a previous coworker) “My wife is not the woman about whom I was most passionate.” (Denouement? He’s divorced. Small wonder, huh?)

Alpha widows?

A marriage isn’t made on eros, and eros is temporary, the honeymoon chemicals in your brain. It never lasts. It’s impossible. If your dealbreaker for marriage is ‘passion‘, you might be spouting Boomer BS. All together now, “But I’m not haaaa-ppy!”

It’s like they don’t know the meaning of the word ‘commitment’.
What did they think they were saying “for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, til death do us part”?
What, like that’s such a casual line?

Crazies use the male weakness for novelty to snare them. Yes, weakness.
If you want a wife who fucks like a porn star, marry a porn star or never marry. Those women are damaged, so unless you wanted a damaged wife and mother to your children, you don’t really want what you think you want.

……..And why can’t you train your wife up? If you’re All That?

The sexual entitlement of modern men is the worst part, the traits they tend to want in a woman are mutually exclusive – so they never ‘settle’. Thank God they’re not breeding. I think a feminist must’ve started MGTOW – fish/bicycle is easier to sell when the r-men are leaving the r-women anyway.

They’ve ruined their value to a wife, even if they manage to avoid STDs, there’s psychological distress and other emotional damage, since men do pair sex with emotions moreso than women – in a marriage.

You can’t expect something you also didn’t do. It’s assortative mating.
R-types do NOT deserve K-wives.
That’s your bed, lie in it.

B. It doesn’t matter what you do, if you have lots of “experience” with other women your memory will screw with you and you’ll be stuck with “Angel was best at A, Betty was best at B, Camille was best at C,…and my wife isn’t the best at anything.” That’s hardly a prescription for lifelong marital bliss.

It’s almost like the virtue of chastity applies to men as well?
The Bible says to stone non-virgins, the example might’ve been female, but it didn’t permit the male promiscuity, which must also occur in heterosexual relations. Considering it forbids adultery, prostitution and fornication, it’s astute to recognize men aren’t off the hook because they lack an explicit mention.
Giving virgins a bad name is explicitly fined and you cannot divorce a woman because she sexually displeases you compared to other women. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy%2022:13-21

I don’t know what the answer is. I fretted like crazy while my sons navigated the fetid swamp that is the Dating Pool. By all appearances each seems to have found a needle in the haystack of harpies, whores and psychotics. All three girls come from intact families (but two of the three families are hardly what I’d rate as up to our standards, and the third is still short. Not a single family cooked meals at home, so my sons had to teach all their wives to cook.)

Tend your own garden. I did my part, and from early indications my sons are doing theirs. They can’t fix other people’s “broken.” The other people have to fix themselves, hopefully soon and in high enough proportions that the entire civilization doesn’t rot to stinking gangrene right down around my extending family’s ears.”

You can tell his true issue is encouraging his sons to gain the 20th century joke called “experience” which does two things 1. ruins another man’s daughters* (in Patriarchy, you care about other families too) and 2. ruins their pair bonding, their sexual satisfaction and increases divorce risk, although nobody has had the balls to study the last one in men, it’s neurobiological. There’s no reason it wouldn’t apply to men.

However, there is no way to prove a woman’s virginity, as with a man. A gynecologist can’t tell, they must ask. Even pregnancy could’ve been a case of contamination. Ancient men hated discussing menses, they were hardly up on the finer points of female anatomy we began studying two centuries ago and have yet to finish with MRI. Medical science moves on. Being promiscuous without being married (to the subject) is the sin.
For example, the hymen rarely bleeds and isn’t supposed to. It thins with age and slackens (not a pool-cover), considering the child brides of the time, either the bleeding was from a child raped, the hymen was too thick by birth or she was too young, and most of the ‘virginal bleeding’ is the vagina, panicking at poor technique e.g. insufficient lubrication, too much, too fast. It’s a sign that a man is bad in bed. The vagina is acutely sensitive, and well-supplied in the vascular system. The hymen? Hardly. If it’s fully intact, the woman cannot bleed and it must be cut surgically. It isn’t medically desirable either.

The only reason they don’t stone the defamatory husband is because the deflowered woman would have issues with remarriage and might be pregnant. However, adulterous men are stoned to death, so arguably it’s just plain extramarital adultery or premarital fornication that are the death sentence offences.

*This is a death sentence offense alone and the reason seduction is a crime.
Deuteronomy 22:23-24

Men insulting their own wives are committing offences, they must cherish according to their vow.
The woman’s ability to be a good wife may be in doubt, but the man’s ability to be a good husband has been proven questionable in his actions.
Also, how weak to point the finger at the person you swore to protect. How childish, how arrogant.

Gays need anal Botox after too much anal sex

Which, Biblically, means any anal sex.

http://www.towleroad.com/2017/06/anal-botox/

I wonder how many girls (and guys into rimming, pegging, whatever ‘anal play’) will need reconstructive surgery because they did something unnatural with bisexual men in denial?
Jesus has abandoned us. There is no God here. ~dogs howling~
Remember, this and STDs are the wages of sin.
No pity. No remorse.

It isn’t the same, just look up the terms ‘anal tear’, ‘anal leakage’, ‘anal sex cancer risk’, ‘anal prolapse’ and ‘anal sex diapers’.

If you cared so much about your body, what feels good and how you look – you wouldn’t do it. But NOOOOOOO. You just wanna be trendy.

For those of a sciencey bent;

https://gutbliss.com/2015/09/08/was-it-good-for-you-sex-and-the-microbiome-bloat/

“bacteria from the anus and groin can gain access to the bladder through the urethra,”

http://www.mtnstopshiv.org/sites/default/files/attachments/Marrazzo%20microbiome%20MTN%20annual%20meeting%202017.pdf

It actually changes the vaginal microbiome (swirly swirly). You can follow on the cited studies.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816837/

It hasn’t been studied long-term. It isn’t safe.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110035/

“Previous studies have linked elevated semen VL to sexual practices such as unprotected insertive anal sex [7], which could introduce gastrointestinal bacteria into the male urogenital compartment and semen.”

If you wouldn’t lick your finger after sticking your finger in there, use a condom at least?

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262074342_Certain_attributes_of_the_sexual_ecosystem_of_high-risk_MSM_have_resulted_in_an_altered_microbiome_with_an_enhanced_propensity_to_generate_and_transmit_antibiotic_resistance

Money study: gays responsible for antibiotic resistance. Significantly.

The next plague, coming to a gay bar near you.

It is an abomination.

But if you have gay sexual habits, that includes you.

“It is argued that in comparison with heterosexuals, high-risk MSM (hrMSM) have a higher prevalence of oro-penile, oro-rectal and anal sex which facilitates an enhanced mixing of the pharyngeal, rectal and penile microbiomes.”

The eternal r-type

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/unbelievable-mother-of-15-kids-somebody-needs-to-pay-somebody-needs-to-be-held-accountable_12012011

for the Title alone

“Somebody needs to pay! Somebody needs to be held accountable!”

comment

“At what number of children does a woman loose her ‘reproductive rights’ to bring even more children into this world that she is unable to care for? Why are you and I ‘forced’ to support children that we had no part in creating? I had no part in the pleasure of any of the orgasms required to create these children …… so why am I required to support them and their mother?
I am informed that here in Florida, the grandmother of the children will go to DCF and allege that her daughter is unfit to care for and raise her grandchildren. Once the mother is declared “unfit”, then the grandmother will gain legal custody of the children and then become their “foster parent”. This changes the whole nature of the situation from a welfare issue to a foster care issue. Grandma can then collect approximately 2.5X more as a foster care provider than her daughter can receive as a welfare recipient.
At this point, the daughter moves back in with her mother and her children and they all live happily after ….. at our expense. How about after the delivery of two welfare babies we also provide the mother with a tubal ligation; at our expense of course. To be completely fare about the whole thing, we also give the father a free vasectomy.
Food for thought homies. Too cold on my part?”

This sex-positive Sexual Revolution propaganda is all about dem dollars.

It’s a wealth transfer to the immature dependents (high time pref) from the actual adults (low time pref). The productive are being vampirised for the leeches, that’s why they can’t afford to breed themselves!

You have a ‘right’ to breed as many children as you like, under our construct of consensual=moral, but you do not have a right to force others to pay for it. At most, your own relations ought to pay for them, not strangers. I find it funny the men complaining about free birth control are the ones (sluts) who benefit from it, they never want to shut down free STD clinics or the abortion clinics, do they?

Replacement-level only is too generous, one child only. You need to breed those genes OUT.
The old rule was all those claiming any welfare go on birth control OR forsake all right to support for any child they produce while claiming.

“This angers me because I remember trying not to cry when I went in for my tubal ligation. We wanted more kids but knew in our hearts we couldn’t afford more. We stopped at three, wanted five originally. It was hard but I figured if I was ever in a position to truly support another lil guy then I could afford a reversal or in vitro. Made sense to me then, makes sense to me now. I don’t regret it because I know my kids would have less if I had been emotional and selfish.

And then to think of the poor couples who can’t have any at all! Really makes me sick. And more and more people have no responsibility for thier actions in any way anymore. I have to wonder, if there were no such thing as welfare, would she have had all those kids?”

It hurts other, better women most of all, the ones who keep their legs shut.

In a way, it’s deeply sexist against K-women. We have a shorter breeding period where we’re forced to pay for welfare trash babies instead of saving for our own.

“Let’s be fair…
Norplant as long as you are on welfare.
Once you start on welfare no more children are added to the payouts.
You lose the right to vote as long as you are on welfare.
to collect welfare you need to turn in the father with a DNA test to prove it.
So if you are down on your luck you get help, and if you turn your life around you get to have as many children as you want, vote, and collect child support from dad(s)”

Why should anyone’s sex life (lifestyle choice) be subsidized by the taxpayer?

The assumption nobody ever attacks.

There is no such thing as a human right to orgasms.

You have no right to a sex life, especially at the expense of others. This goes from free contraception to rape. Within marriage, you have a right to sex. That is literally the ‘conjugal right‘. You don’t have conjugal rights over anyone you’re not married to. That’s the real issue, they refuse to marry.

They want all the perks of marriage: sex, children, financial providence but no obligations or responsibilities.

In a patriarchy, it’s always the father’s responsibility as the provider, this is more a paternal failure but the women are almost as bad. Simply extract all the mother’s costs from the father, or he can work it off in prison. That’s the only way to do this, the traditional way.

Without promiscuity culture, this would never have happened.

Social shame would have prevented it but who wants to name the Beast of lust? All both parents want is ‘fun’.

They had sex knowing the biological consequence. You are taught this before puberty. You can have ‘fun’ in a thousand other ways or take up a masturbation habit if orgasms are so core to your self-esteem. Too much sex and the wrong sex (out of marriage, with strangers) is bad for your body and mind. It’s also common sense. There is NO such thing as ‘casual sex’. It has one, clear outcome.

comment
“If you can’t feed em, don’t breed em.”
“The bitch and her bastards belong in the gas chamber.”
“How’s about the Dads pay and you keep your legs together. I don’t owe you anything.”

If anything, they owe society.

In these cases, it’s always unfair to blame only the mother when it takes two to horizontal tango.
Always ask: where’s the father?

comment on a previously linked article, relevant
Long before you start saving money for your own kids, you pay for someone else’s. Get some single mother’s kid set up with toys, clothes and food and THEN you can start putting aside some money for your OWN kid, but not before. First some brown kid somewhere gets a Tonka truck, new jeans, KFC, ice cream sandwiches with your money. See what’s left, stick it in the piggy bank for your kid. Fuck it.”

The welfare system is unjust.

Our future is stolen.