HPV in the brain

Yes, in.

http://www.miriamgrossmanmd.com/say-its-not-so-hpv-in-the-brain/

“We know that HPV can cross the placenta and infect the fetus. In one study, this happened in over twelve per cent of women with HPV.”

As always it’s the innocent who suffer.
The sins of the father…

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+34%3A7&version=ESV

“keeping steadfast love for thousands,[a] forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation.”

And before you think I’m man-hating, no.

It’s the data.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/half-adult-males-carry-hpv
“The virus notorious for causing cervical cancer in women also turns up frequently in men and can hang on unnoticed for months or even years, researchers report online March 1 in Lancet. The study solidifies earlier research indicating that human papillomavirus is highly prevalent in men and strengthens the case for vaccinating men and boys against it, the report’s authors say.”

Imagine my shock.

“The study, in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found that 11 million men and 3.2 million women in the United States had oral HPV infections. Among them, 7 million men and 1.4 million women had strains that can cause cancers of the throat, tongue and other areas of the head and neck.”
“The rate was higher among men who also had genital HPV. (Almost half of men aged 18 to 60 have a genital HPV infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.)”

TLDR?

It’s a male-carried disease.
By far (that was a 5:1 male to female ratio, deny it).

7/1.4=5 for the illiterates at home.

https://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv-and-men.htm
The penile cancer risk for men goes unmentioned. Some informed consent, right? Feel empowered yet?
No, there is currently no approved test for HPV in men.”
Routine testing (also called ‘screening’) to check for HPV or HPV-related disease before there are signs or symptom, is not recommended by the CDC”
They want the men to spread it.

Back to the original doctor.

This is major news, and I’m wondering – why no headlines about it? There were no press conferences with Dr Crino, and no statements from SIECUS or Planned Parenthood, our leaders in “comprehensive” sexuality education.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

There’s a double standard at work: if research suggested that sugary drinks cause fetal malformations, it surely would be announced with alarm by every media outlet.

Cover-up isn’t a double standard but okay.

With sexual health it’s always been different. The negative consequences of sexual license are often ignored or minimized. Young people are led to believe that with condoms and STI testing they’re safe, or safe enough. But it’s not so.

“Free lust” is anything but free of consequences. If only the Bible mentioned fornication and how sinning against oneself is different.

I believe that one day there will be congressional hearings about the persistent whitewashing of STIs, the exaggerated efficacy of condoms, and the endorsement by sex educators of high risk behaviors. Until then, the madness continues.”

One day there might be real science, we can all dream!

They make so much money off pelvic exams, which by the way, were pioneered in Nazi concentration camps!

And that’s just the tip of the hooker berg.
It was the same with syphilis and other diseases. Men would catch it, usually from hookers and infect their wife (or eventual wife) and their children would have medical issues (look up the syphilis skulls). Deliberate honeypots for this purpose would bring down an entire nation quickly via its leaders. Wouldn’t it, France?

We have DNA testing to trace precise strains of types but that’s small comfort.

If you can get it from a handshake or a peck on the cheek (children, Europeans) nobody is safe.

Peterson supports shekels

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2018/06/02/peterson-cant-handle-the-truth/

You think he doesn’t know?

They pay him through the nose in private to tell them what they wanna hear.

He said the “best way to deceive someone is a (tiny) slice of the truth” (intellectually dishonest).

I’m starting to think I should autoplay Disney’s Let it Go on this blog.

This is apropos to 90% of my content, it’s commentary on the inevitable.

Bachelors are the most reliable source of income, think about it!

Everybody’s Business is Nobody’s Business by Daniel Defoe

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2052/2052-h/2052-h.htm

This is amazing.

If she be tolerably handsome, and has any share of cunning, the apprentice or her master’s son is enticed away and ruined by her.  Thus many good families are impoverished and disgraced by these pert sluts, who, taking the advantage of a young man’s simplicity and unruly desires, draw many heedless youths, nay, some of good estates, into their snares; and of this we have but too many instances.

Yes, the poor young men.

Knowing that Defoe wrote the phrase “pert sluts” intentionally gives me life.

It’s like one gigantic rant, I’m serious.

Some more artful shall conceal their condition, and palm themselves off on young fellows for gentlewomen and great fortunes.  How many families have been ruined by these ladies?

That’s a good point, we have too many pert sluts passing themselves off as ladies, and the male equivalents.

when the father or master of the family, preferring the flirting airs of a young prinked up strumpet, to the artless sincerity of a plain, grave, and good wife, has given his desires aloose, and destroyed soul, body, family, and estate.  But they are very favourable if they wheedle nobody into matrimony, but only make a present of a small live creature, no bigger than a bastard, to some of the family, no matter who gets it; when a child is born it must be kept.

Men are dumb.

This is how the r-genes spread.

Adultery is a mortal sin because it reduces the fitness of your legitimate children, that you owe the duty to (and nobody else has to pick up after). The money that goes on the bastard should be invested in your real spawn. You owe no religious, moral duty to the children of a mother you never married (when the oath for the duty is sworn and signed). In purely religious terms, the marital union is the only place of obligation, above anything else.

This acceptance of bastards would explain how aristocracy becomes decadent – the genes come from adultery.

Notice: it’s a class thing, he is equally enraged by the follies of men behaving below their station.

The Romans had a law called Jus Trium Liberorum, by which every man who had been a father of three children, had particular honours and privileges.  This incited the youth to quit a dissolute single life and become fathers of families, to the support and glory of the empire.

Reddit and eugenics denial

Okay, let’s say you’re God. Thought experiment.

You know someone will make a bad parent or the kid will be evil, do you make them infertile?

If not, you’re the Devil because you’re knowingly promoting suffering in the world.

How kind.

There’s a reason tons of Devil stories revolve around him producing evil children.

Nature wins, Nurture is largely measurement error, academic fraud and the sociologist’s fallacy of assumption (unknown therefore nurture).

https://www.nature.com/subjects/behavioural-genetics

Let’s quote n’ comment from reddit.

“Everyone disagreeing with this sort of thinking is retarded. You guys do realize that there’s millions of children starving right now because their parents were poor but still fucked?”

You have somewhat below 2 billion starving people one century ago.

Now this has tripled or nearly quadrupled, depending on who you ask.

Yeah, you’re the charitable ones. The First World is starving (I have posted on food security) but at least the populations of say, Europe, are currently sustainable.

The rest of the world? What happens when the funding stops? Oh, these wannabe Saints will just look away or blame rich people. Also, breeding kids to work while you sit on your ass is literally child slavery.

Given the boosted pop N, the average global IQ must’ve gone way down, so no, they can’t innovate their way out of it. These people would struggle to earn a dollar a day.

What’s wrong with 100% effective, reversible birth control? That’s all sterilization is. You can still harvest cells for reproduction. It simply stops accidental, natural reproduction, which is what all the shitty parents claim (to the welfare people), like they didn’t know that fucking makes brats. (underage parents should be immediately arrested as rapists, yes, a child can rape another child, obviously)

“but dont you know, its their right to breed, how fucking dare you question an imbecille electing to condemn yet another person to suffering and death without putting any thought into it?

no, it isn’t their right to breed, where is the right to breed
does an 85yo bachelor have a right to breed? can a random woman take a celebrity man’s sperm because she has a right to breed? does a 12yo girl who loves babies have a right to breed?
There isn’t even a right to sex, because it involves taking something from another person. The genetic theft of their body’s essence, a deeper rape than rape.
Thou Shalt Not Steal.

youre so disgusting, how dare you even think that they shouldnt have bred! baby killer!

entitled, they think they’re entitled to something because they see kids as a net positive since society doesn’t enforce full parental responsibilities (on both sires, half won’t do)

its absolutely amazing that people think they have right to another person. what kind of mental gymnastics are you all doing to justify that to yourself? I hope y’all remember that this is the exact same mindset that rapists have, “i do what i want and it doesnt matter what this other person wants, because my wants are more important”‘

Either way, the STD epidemic developing antibiotic resistance is properly sterilizing SJWs as we speak, the wages of sin.

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/20/health/std-statistics-record-high/index.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2902038

Infertility: a preventable epidemic?” [yes I know not all, not even close to all but enough to count statistically so shh it counts for debate]

https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-the-std-epidemic-in-america-is-about-to-get-a-lot-worse

You wanted a Sexual Revolution, welcome to the foreseeable outcome to any deathstyle.

Technology can’t save you from biology.

“What would that look like? Billions in health care costs and tragic public health consequences such as a rampage of STD-caused infertility.”

t r a g i c

Narcissists can’t abuse children they cannot conceive.

“For all the lobbing about of The Handmaiden’s Tale in pop culture these days, this is one epidemic where the analogy really does fit: Although many women don’t realize it, rising STDs directly correlate as a leading cause of infertility in women.”

so much for consent, huh?
It’s almost like the old, real consent is a marriage license….

Good luck denying that in court.

It’s amazing how pro-life abortionists get when you point out they’d make bad parents anyway. The best way to fuck with SJWs is to agree with them for the most right-wing reasons humanly possible.

Low IQ can’t see the long-term consequences or implications on society, you see.

Liberal sub-fertility is a definitive feature of r-selection.

“We now have rates of babies being born with congenital syphilis not seen in decades,” says David Harvey, executive director of the National Coalition of STD Directors. “It’s a crime.”

yes, on the parents
I am not responsible for your bad tree producing rotten apples.

“It’s a failure of our health care system.”

Giving out the antibiotics willy-nilly to people with STDs caused the resistance, and not just in people with the STDs. Everyone else suffers: children, the elderly, chronic conditions, people getting surgery in the ER, everyone else pays for it.

Not opinion, a fact: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/gonorrhoea-antibiotics-world-health-organisation-who-untreatable-disease-mutates-sti-std-sexually-a7828186.html

Sepsis will return and infect those innocent mothers in hospitals.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/gonorrhea-super-sti-hiv-infertility-symptoms-antibiotic-drug-resistant-treatment-a7330801.html

It’s almost like monogamy evolved.

“The costs down the road of treating these conditions are enormous with estimates in the billions. STD rates will continue to increase in the United States absent some dramatic change in how we confront these epidemics. Period.”

We’re slowly becoming the Third World, as the First dies.

“We would have very sick people who we can’t treat or get out of hospital.” 

We have death pathways for that.

Back to reddit.

“You dont get to talk about rights while happily ignoring the rights of those that are created by imbecille parents because they couldnt use a condom, or wanted a mini me. You cannot have one without the other.”

The right to breed is a full and total responsibility to what you breed. Simple logic.

You can’t shake it onto anyone else, they didn’t magically possess your genitals. This train of thought, from legal adults.

The simple way to put this issue Tesla noted? There is an inverse correlation between IQ and fecundity: the stupids are fucking.

If technology is going to save everyone in the future, you need people smart enough to do that, it doesn’t just happen.

I love the “correlation isn’t causation” crowd, I just ask them about smoking causing lung cancer, it’s just a correlation bro. They wouldn’t bother with correlations if they couldn’t seek to infer causation. They aren’t the same thing but you need point A to get to B, that’s called…. The Scientific Method!

At least, in theory.

There is also an inverse correlation between IQ and violence, especially sexual violence.

Centuries of literature supporting this. Bear in mind, IQ is how teachable you are.

Do feminists want to discuss this? Hell no, they expect rapists to respond to reason and magically float away on a cloud of logic.

“It doesn’t work as it should be like. Like most humans get to have children, weak, stupid, with a genetic disease, these bad traits no longer mean impossibility to find a partner or to die.”

pre-welfare the test used to be social 1. find someone to marry you for life, no take-backsies and 2. can you financially support yourself and kids? (“keep them”, mentioned in the vows)

“One of the problems with current evolution is the excess of tolerance.”

pop the fake money bubble and that’ll go away real quick
It’s so petulant about the State “allowing” them to have kids, the true issue: how about the State “allowing” them to rob their neighbors to support their bad fuck-ups, literally? And anyone saying the truly disabled have a good life never want to socialize with them, they think Mindy going through the bad break-up has issues. I don’t care if the local ghetto trash have 9 kids. I don’t want to pay a penny to raise kids I had no consent in making. Full choice, full duty. No consent means no money.

It’s already legal to kill the disabled, abortions and death pathways. Go after the deadbeats (the bullets in the gun, the sperm donors) and stop subsidizing mothers of future criminals. Criminology has proven this, a chemical cascade triggered by deadbeat fathers and yet the lawyers pretend these people are innocent.

You agree with Tesla if you believe there is any such thing as a bad parent.

Where’s the father? Why can’t the father pay? Isn’t that his role?

If I pay for a child, can I replace the parents? Can I go to their graduation?

State adoption is taxpayer burden.

“Candidates for chemical sterilization include:

Men over the age of 20 that rape prepubescent children. Second offense might be required just in case of wrongful conviction for first time offenders.

over 20? why the arbitrary? all rapists, m/f, repeat offence is a good test
chemical castration is the solution there, unless they move to rape with objects

this next one

Men who have children out of wedlock with 3 or more women and more than one is on welfare. May also require the offender does not have a job for more than 1 year or something or is compounded with criminal record.

“Men who have children out of wedlock with 3 or more women” – err no, fuckboys who have children out of wedlock full stop, it’s called a condom or a vasectomy, why do they always let the men off? No welfare queens without kings.

It’s also a very reasonable argument to not allow people to have children who can not care for them.

unless you’re bribing them into learned helplessness

I’m not sure what this looks like and this is what the eugenics conversations were all about in the early 20th century. Fortunately it didn’t materialize since there was some racism then. Extremely low IQ or mentally disabled should not have children, not sure if sterilization is the answer but the conversation shouldn’t be buried for fear of moral condemnation.

http://www.fox23.com/news/oklahoma/oklahoma-woman-heeds-suggestion-of-judge-to-be-sterilized/695825480

And what about the fathers?

Oh, so 50% shitty DNA is fine for the gene pool?

https://www.rt.com/uk/229303-compulsory-sterilization-woman-disabilities/

Already here, thanks progressives!

Evolutionary biology would suggest that only the strong survive and thrive or those with the most desirable characteristics procreate. The developments over the last century have provided enough excess wealth

pathological altruism

that the weak are surviving and thriving on the back of the strong.

parasitism formerly known as socialism

Idiocracy is a comedy but the potential of such a future shouldn’t be ignored. It’s certainly possible if the best of us continue to have less children and much later in life.”

reply “Are there genetic markers that predispose people to have kids out of wedlock? Be on welfare? or have a criminal record? No, there are not.”

There’s plenty of genetic research marker material on r-traits.

e.g.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/210277.php

It’s a long game.

When they don’t make themselves infertile by STDs, they abort or choose to be child-free.

Fine by us.

“So you’re really just advocating that we punish the very poor.”

why would rich people go on welfare, you utter moron

Stupid people typically play the What you really mean game because their brain can’t handle what a smart person actually said.

Fewer poor people as a % (larger total group) have committed crimes compared to the white-collar middle class. By all means, let’s eliminate classism in arrests and enforcement.

Making poor people get married could be easy, making them stay married is a trick. By all means, let’s encourage marriage and monogamy in the poor.

These people think they’re intelligent.

Those aren’t bad outcomes.

“I mean, you seem to be very into magic. Which is stereotypically filled with unattractive low status neckbeards. You would almost definately be on a list for chemical castration (get the term right) if it were ever implemented.”

Yes, genetics is magic.

Wait, stereotypes aren’t real when it comes to breeding sows and their pimps, but do exist when you wanna get on your high horse and signal?

And so what? There are people conscientious enough to do something that’s good for society, even if it comes at personal cost. Those are called K-types.

Tesla was one of those, that’s why he never had children.

This whole thing is about taking responsibility for yourself, the entire point.
You can hear the ocean between their ears.

“Doesn’t mean that we can’t discuss it, it’s not as open and shut a discussion as you think. Most would agree there are people that should not have children. So what do we do when they have children? The answer right now is nothing, we have to take care of their children with taxes and effort and pay for it in more ways than one. Children without fathers leads to more dysfunctional families and abnormal, criminal behaviors and so forth.”

Even the people who get it, don’t. We? Who is We? This isn’t my kin.

We’re in Stage 2 of 3. Boom before bust.
Their children. Children are a blood-line. That line could stop any time, any place. If the State decides to stop, the parents step in and do their job or nature does.

It’s called a bachelor tax and all the successful societies of history had it.

Men are told they aren’t responsible for their children. That’s the first point of deviance from the truth, leaving the woman holding the baby comes second.

“The developments over the last century have provided enough excess wealth that the weak are surviving and thriving on the back of the strong.” not for long, cut off the money supply and the rest will follow

It’s already happening, there will be no economic recovery, we rode the fumes of post-WW BS. Prosperity again is impossible without a burn-down of the current model for cleansing purposes.

reply “As far as responsibility goes — that isn’t simply a genetic trait, but an environmental one”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5068715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152902

“Findings from genetic studies of personality have furthered our understanding about the genetic etiology of personality, which, like neuropsychiatric diseases themselves, is highly polygenic. Polygenic analyses have showed genetic correlations between personality and psychopathology, confirming that genetic studies of personality can help to elucidate the etiology of several neuropsychiatric diseases.”

Over time the number of genetic things is rising. We live in a dysgenic societal structure by every conceivable metric. The dam will break, it’s a matter of time.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27779626

How precise is current testing model/s?

40-60% identifiable.

Biometrical genetic studies suggest that the personality dimensions, including neuroticism, are moderately heritable (~0.4 to 0.6)”

Seriously, can redditfags use fucking google? For once?

Technically, personality tests should be illegal.

“Findings demonstrate that neuroticism can be significantly predicted across ancestry,”

so not genocide

“and highlight the importance of studying polygenic contributions to personality in non-European populations.”

But in a eugenic society, are good pro-social, responsible personalities selected for?

https://www.nhs.uk/news/mental-health/neuroticism-can-be-good-for-your-health/

Yup.

this is dubbed pseudoscience as an excuse not to address the argument

the redditfag’s lalala I’m not listening

he goes on to add

“Pseudoscientific beliefs are those which appear scientific but which don’t use the scientific method ie ones where logic and reality don’t coincide.”

Nature Genetics doesn’t use the scientific method?

“The idea that genetic traits are unambiguously good or bad is provably false.”

Yeah, the genetic traits for various disabilities aren’t bad, who wouldn’t choose to have (pick a disease)?
MORAL RELATIVISM DOESN’T APPLY TO MEDICINE.

DISEASE EXISTS TO BE TREATED.

“Knowing what traits will be useful in the future and which won’t be requires both a level of understanding of biology that we don’t have”

you claim to be pro-science? really? we already know the genes for dominant conditions, we can make a start

“and the ability to predict the future which we can’t do.”

SCIENCE CAN’T PREDICT THINGS, GUYS!

yeah maybe if you’re working in climate science and spinning a baby’s toy wheel to decide the forecast

“In other words eugenics is a totally crap idea.”

I don’t understand it so stupid? [appeal to incredulity]

Truly, these are our intellectual betters.

The guy quotes wikipedia and the Flynn effect, which admits it lies.

Scientism is a cult.

“However based on how we believe evolution works it is physically impossible for us as humans, at this point in our developmental stage to determine how, or why select traits have evolved over other. Especially considering that we can’t even prove the origins of our existence. Point is it’s not pseudoscience just because it isn’t proven.”

theories don’t exist?

Creationism rhetoric?

Back to the STD thing, do you believe evolution indulges in population culls?

“The stars are aligned for us to get this done. For a modern, industrialized wealthy nation to tolerate the continued transmission of this disease should be unacceptable. We don’t have to have it here.”

Tolerate? Yes. Who brought these diseases back? They had to come in from somewhere. Where’s the origin?

“It is unconscionable that in the last several years that STD control programs around the country, city and state level have been emasculated in terms of the resources that we have,”

The programmes intended/funded to produce less disease made more, much more and drug-resistant.

We should convict the people who ran it.

The investment actually broke the law.

If the apps are a public health risk, why are they legal?

“And that’s what happens with drug-resistant bacteria. So not only do you have this issue where we’re seeing more cases of infection, now we’re starting to see and get concerned about growing resistance to the treatment that we have.”

You can deny evolution but you cannot deny the consequences of evolution.

Stupid people lose.

You should be able to sue anyone for harming your body.

That includes male or female, and STD.

back to reddit for a time

“Ensuring that people have options goes a lot farther than simply writing off people who make mistakes.”

No, a mistake is spilling milk, not making another human life.

You do have options: if you have sex, you are responsible for consequence, you consented.

“People with no conscience or concern for their community are not good people.”

Antisocial people are literally the ones in all our horror movies.

The anti-natal will die.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2263631/Sterilised-10-minutes–regret-rest-lives-Thousands-women-using-new-NHS-device-banish-fear-pregnancy.html

It’s already happening.

That could be made compulsory in gang rapists.

It isn’t compassion to spare people with real problems, it’s guilt and it increases suffering logically. Stop guilt tripping healthy people.
“Her body, her choice” is strange wording, not in rape cases, it isn’t. And her fuck-up, her funding. [and his]

Think of how thi$ State happened.

Technically, we’re just making the lower quality breed too much for cannon fodder for the next Malthusian trap so its dysgenic while they’re alive but – given low fitness (they can’t grow food or do simple jobs like the old useless idiots) it’s eugenic once society turns again in the next economic collapse, famine, war, disease, or all four.
The over-breeding is to off-set ever-increasing national debt, it’s divided per head, that’s why Labour never wants to fix it. It needs voters and it needs collateral to borrow money to fund academia to tell you they’re good.
They’re only laughing because they can’t see the gravy train slowing, being low IQ useless people. Laughing as they choke the golden goose of their food supply.
When the music stops?
Same level of dense goes for smug Guardian readers thinking they can out-signal demographics, if Christians win, they’re fucked; if Muslims win, same result. No more pride parades or talk of rights without the Englishman.
As long as we the logical limit the damage to normal IQs, their deaths will be a greater economic relief than all the losses, including those huge families that could be taken down in one swoop of black death or something like it. On a long timeline, it’s assured.
Have you seen the hygiene of the public-shitting Asian? Without the spicy food, they’d be dead from poisoning long ago. We evolved for bland food because it kept us alive and food kept good better in colder climes. Lots of mouths to feed isn’t our way with low infant mortality.
Their position is weak, actually, many openings.
Socialism needs more and more voters until they all starve and die of disease, see the Chinese pattern (or Poland). It’s the rule of history in politics. As the NHS dies, a famine and then a food-borne disease seem likely.
History is mirrored like that.
The useful idiots don’t understand that when national debt contracts, their bill will be called due. They believe the white socialists when promised a free feast.

That’s fine, we can throw them in debtor’s prison or make them work off the debt (the Empire regains slavery).
Socialism weakens its people by making them other-reliant, dependent like a child, when over generations, they fail and die. Red Scare was about this, weakening patriotism, weakening the People it claims to support (no, it’s middle class statist whores who want to live off the workers as the new masters, we call this a Government job).
Why do Communists need a ruling class? Why need a government? You’re equal, right?

and what’s more patriotic than stealing from someone born on the same soil?
On some level, the stupid sense they are blind to reality.
Expect nasty surprises. We try to warn you because we actually care, we want to fix things now.
This is about as likely as Hollywood giving up the coke-whores.

Old men, dead babies

Harsh title? Yes. Accurate? Yes.

Both parental ages factor into miscarriage risk, equally.

https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/17/6/1649/2919231
Miscarriages occur in teens too so I dunno who is dumb enough to rely on this one variable alone.

37 is the age when maternal age starts to matter for women (depending on family history) if you look at the shift in gradient on the charts (barely any change before) but 40 is the huge risk age in both men and women, as in this study.
“However, the increase in risk was much greater for couples composed of a woman aged ≥35 years and of a man aged ≥40 years.”
Is Human Reproduction not a prestigious enough journal?

The 37/40 thing:
Age and the Risk of Miscarriage
It isn’t sufficiently studied in men but data on paternal age as a factor keeps coming out.
Looks like you can’t just blame the woman again. Takes two to make a baby.
“a dramatic rise starting after age 37, with the steepest increase occurring after age 40.”
“The man’s age matters too. Having a partner over the age of 40 significantly raises the chances of a miscarriage.” Nature doesn’t like old, mutant sperm either.
“Over half of miscarriages are caused by genetic abnormalities.” It isn’t a bad thing, really.
“On average, a woman in her early 20s will have chromosomal abnormalities in about 17% of her eggs” So that’s a really terrible metric considering humans are human. There is always risk.
It’s worse in men than women, so I’m hardly favouring women by opposing this reductionism.
“And as men age, chromosomal defects and point mutations–changes to a single nucleotide in their DNA–become increasingly common.”
Where minors are raped and studied, they tend not to do well either.

Memorize that chart.

A teenager is as bad (at-risk) as a woman with an additional two decades.
You’re still debating less than one percentage point of difference though. Are you autistic?

It’s an interesting variable but hardly everything.

An IVF study


Note: Again, 37 is the magic number.
“While IVF helps many couples overcome their fertility problems, it largely cannot overcome the age-related increase in genetic abnormalities. Without genetically normal sperm and eggs, a viable pregnancy is impossible.”
“Despite this problem, several studies involving couples discordant for age now paint a clear and consistent picture: older prospective fathers raise the risk of miscarriage by about 25-50%. One study found an a 60% increase in the odds of a miscarriage if the father was over 40. Another found a roughly 25% increase in the risk of miscarriage for fathers over the age of 35.”

I guess the Have it All guys can’t read.


As you can clearly see, getting a teenager up the duff would actually be worse.
All things considered.
There are plenty of studies on this but what’s the point?
They basically show the same thing.
No doubt they’ll try to cherry-pick something else to draw focus back onto Boo Women.

A little more then I’ll give up and hope men who value their health listen.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3809297/
“Trends towards increasing paternal age are being observed in the UK as well as USA, due to delay in marriages for attaining better socio-economic stability.”
Fucking feminists. /sarc

Advancing paternal age has been shown to result in subfertility, adverse pregnancy outcomes (miscarriage, late foetal death, preterm delivery, low birth weight), birth defects (cleft lip and palate, congenital heart defects), achondroplasia, osteogenesis imperfect , Apert’s syndrome, schizophrenia, childhood cancer (brain cancer, retinoblastoma, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia) and adult cancer (breast, prostate and nervous system).3 Possible mechanisms for these problems include single gene mutations, autosomal dominant diseases, structural abnormalities in sperm chromosomes (e.g., reciprocal translocations) and multiple genetic / chromosomal defects. DNA damage in sperm of men aged 36 – 57 years was found to be 3 times that of men less than 35 years”

Good luck blaming females for that.

“The present study has demonstrated that the paternal age more than 35 years was an independent risk factor associated with spontaneous first trimester miscarriages. In order to eliminate the effect of maternal age, which is itself a known risk factor, we selected women between the age of 20 – 35 years, as this is considered to be ideal age for child bearing.”

Yes. 20-35 is the ideal range.


The reproductive system needs time to become stable, women take longer to physically mature (completed by the late twenties).

Paternal age is a factor in disease and infertility, independently.

“They recommend counselling of men more than 40 years of age when seeking pregnancy.
I’m not gloating, my heart goes out to men who waited too long and have to raise, at best, a sickly child. They need to be warned of the risks of waiting just like women do.

“Kleinhaus K et al have studied various age groups and have found father’s age more than 40 years to be significantly associated with spontaneous miscarriage.13 Slama R has also studied age ranges and have found that risk of spontaneous miscarriage showed linear increase in the hazard of spontaneous miscarriage in male age between 20 and 45 years. They also observed that hazard ratio was highest with male age > 45 years compared with 18 – 24 years (HR = 1.87, 95% CI, 1.01 – 3.44).1 Others have used paternal age between 30 to more than 50 years.”

The male system matures before the female, (18, mid-20s). If we’re being nubile about social policy, the wife should be older slightly.

So the ideal female age for motherhood is 20-35, but as we see here, ideal male age for fatherhood is 18-24, up to 30 if we’re pushing it. You’d expect the male age to be earlier since they have more DNA damage over time and shorter lifespans combined with earlier physical maturation.

Biology? Sorry?

Freezing sperm doesn’t last by the way. They go off.

“Studies on paternal age and fertility suggest that male biological clock does exist. Similar to women, advancing paternal age results in negative effects on reproductive outcomes.”
“Klonoff-Cohen also found decreasing pregnancy rate with male age. Pregnancy rate was 53% for men less than or equal to 35 years, 35% for 36 – 40 years and 13% for men > 40 years.”
Again, 35 seems to be the turning point for male infertility. Almost equal to the female 37 downturn but the male peak is earlier because the (greater) damage is cumulative (see next quote) and gamete production is ongoing.

Why do you oldies wanna marry young unless you’re admitting there’s a deleterious effect to counteract?
In future, more studies will look at differences in the under-35 men, between, say, 18-24, 25-29 and 30-35.

We postulate from these studies that damage to sperm accumulates over a man’s lifetime. Sperm making cells continue to divide throughout the man’s life, increasing the chances of mutations. Impaired DNA replication and repair mechanisms and increased DNA fragmentation.
DNA damage could also result from reactive oxygen species formed by alcohol, nicotine and drug abuse.”
The wages of sin.
“According to Aitken RJ’s study, male genital tract infection can result in DNA damage in male germ cells and therefore, increase the rates of miscarriage.”
Oh look, male chastity was logical.

“CONCLUSION
Paternal age more than 35 years was found to be an independent risk factor in spontaneous first trimester miscarriages.”

They haven’t really studied younger in sufficient detail to claim that’s fine though, findings like those mentioned above show <30 is ideal in both sexes, to start.

https://academic.oup.com/humupd/article/16/1/65/705193
There a section called “Paternal age and infections”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4125283/
“In this Opinion piece we argue that the tendency of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) to cause infertility is likely to reflect an evolutionary adaptation of the pathogens. We use an evolutionary perspective to understand how STI pathogens may benefit from reducing fertility in the host and what clues the mechanisms of pathogenesis can offer to the evolution of this ability. While we concentrate on human infections, we will also briefly discuss the broader context of STI-induced infertility in other species.

STIs are a common cause of human infertility worldwide…”
No, men can’t sow any wild oats.

No such thing.

“Reduced fertility and an increased risk of complications during and following pregnancy both contribute to reduced reproductive success in the host—and may benefit the sexually transmitted pathogen by destabilizing partnerships and increasing promiscuity.”
The microbes in your urethra are thinking for you.

Not even your dick.

This does explain gay culture. Wow, gay germ theory gets everywhere. This also explains their fetish for fluids and pozzing parties. At least they’re somewhat aware of it.

“Not only are highly promiscuous individuals exposed to a higher risk of acquiring STIs, but STIs may also actively generate hubs of transmission in a vicious circle of promiscuity and infertility: in traditional societies,”
It’s anti-natal and terrible for society.
You can’t leave behind a life of sin.

Also liberal fertility rates make a lot more sense right about now. It is a bug, and it is a feature!

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pass-it-on-children-can-inherit-herpes/
STDs can be passed on at conception, which explains the first trimester paternal age miscarriage finding, the older you get, the more diseases infect the body.
A direct study hasn’t been conducted yet – sexual infection history and miscarriage.
Could it find funding?

Doubtful. Even if it looked at both parents.

Onward, to computer modelling!

Sim City; Sin City Edition.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/apr/12/stis-may-have-driven-ancient-humans-to-monogamy-study-says
“Writing in the journal Nature Communications, Bauch and his colleague Richard McElreath from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany, describe how they built a computer model to explore how bacterial sexually transmitted infections such as chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis that can cause infertility, affected populations of different sizes. The authors considered both small hunter gatherer-like populations of around 30 individuals and large agricultural-like populations of up to 300 individuals, running 2,000 simulations for each that covered a period of 30,000 years.

In small polygynous communities, the researchers found that outbreaks of such STIs were short-lived, allowing the polygynous population to bounce back. With their offspring outnumbering those from monogamous individuals, polygyny remained the primary modus operandi.

[coughs in r-selection]

But when the team looked at the impact of STIs on larger polygynous societies, they found a very different effect. Instead of clearing quickly, diseases such as chlamydia and gonorrhea became endemic. As a result, the population plummeted and monogamists, who did not have multiple partners, became top dog.

[hums in Malthusian tones]

The team also found that while monogamists who didn’t ‘punish’ polygyny could gain a temporary foothold, it was monogamists that ‘punished’ polygyny – often at their own expense of resources – that were the most successful.

[religion is evolutionally fit]

[K-types FTW and for discrimination based on self-protection]

While the form of such punishments were not specified in the model, Bauch suggests fines or social ostracisation among the possible penalties.

[stop paying for their babies and STD treatments? FIRSTLY?]
[kinda like how prison was meant to keep you from breeding – a genetic death penalty – until you dummies invented welfare for their women and conjugal rights, making the whole thing useless]

The results, they say, reveal that STIs could have played a role in the development of socially imposed monogamy that coincided with the rise of large communities that revolved around agriculture.”

Socially imposed?

Well, he had to get published I suppose.

The social/cultural clearly comes after the rest. Like, the die-offs?

Civilization has and always will be K-selected. 

Who needs gun control?

Social harm is a sensitive concept. Antisocial is the modern term for degenerate, and harmful = evil. The fact it’s used by moral relativists (the immoral) is not puzzling, they are rentseeking.

Sex and defence are vital for life, inextricable.

On the other hand, what do you think the transsexual stuff is all about?
The love of life shouldn’t stop at the waist.
Artificial wombs and sperm will make functioning human units redundant.
Welcome to the next rationale for compulsive sterilization.

Gun control makes less sense, if we had to compare.
Why?

Well, the State can’t breed for you. With the DNA database production, they might try but the resources do not exist.
The State only exists because it claims it can protect you better than you can yourself.

I’ll go into detail on a future economic post.

However.

It isn’t the sex that’s the problem – it’s responsible people bankrolling it.
To my knowledge, you have to pay for STD treatments, antibiotic shots, “education”, vaccines, abortions, and vitally, schooling, entertainment (public child-centred) and welfare to children you did not breed and who have a direct dysgenic effect on your personal fitness (ability to rear yourself and your own potential germline).
It is a replacement effort from the self-sufficient to the docile. Look at China’s pension age and demographic decline. Any society geared toward the deathstyle of atheism is doomed.
No private gun owner has forced me to buy them wood polish, if you catch my drift.

I don’t have to pay for the children of blood relations, I have no personal joy or legal control of raising them, so why complete strangers? Welfare is impossible to bridge in a multiracial society, eventually the useless eaters will outnumber the producers.

When the State absorbs the full cost of fucking and childbearing, socialism, the true cost is borne on the responsible, twice over. First, when they lose their own opportunity and second, to see it given to another, claiming to be needier.

What is need, in the paradigm of personal responsibility (empowering) and tough love?
This isn’t a Christian society anymore, this is a scientific secular one.
AKA no emotional appeals and no virtue of charity.

Why can’t we choose which causes our taxes fund? Why is a childless bachelor pressured by the ageist notion they should put children first?

The see-saw is closer to bumping over, what happens when we can’t write any more checks to breeders?

We’ll be sending them the bill. They are the future, after all. And the future is national debt in need of payment. Slavery, voluntary slavery, may return.

These societal ills would never exist without the money funding them.
Turn off the money spigot and the degeneracy dies.
All it takes is one syphilis case rotting on national TV and hook-up culture would look decidedly less sexy, contrary to what Hollywood portrays.

Legalizing all the hardest drugs (and only the hardest drugs) on condition of refusing the users medical treatment would solve this in under a year.

To correct stupid, simply take off the controls placed by the non-stupid.
High time preference kills.

The training wheels and safety bubble of modern society is its greatest blue pill.