Distinguish Sex Ed from grooming

The new term for child grooming is Sex Ed, if you look into what they’re actively encouraging.

https://gab.ai/truthwhisper/posts/38494894

“A pamphlet/book called, ‘Happy, Healthy, and Hot’ pushed and endorsed by the United Nations says you DON’T have to tell potential sexual partners that you have HIV, in ‘It’s Perfectly Normal’, and the “It’s All One Curriculum’ that has and is being given out to tens of millions of children is recommended for kids under ten years old.

In these three pamphlets it shows graphic images of kids and adults masturbating,

Instruction manual

why do they need to know how to service an adult?

teaching five-year-olds that masturbation is not harmful,

tell that to A&E

porn really needs to be restricted completely from minors

it’s causing brain damage

gay sex, in the ‘It’s All One Curriculum’ they use the term “sexual pleasure” 62 times,

“consent” doesn’t make something moral and hedonism is mostly evil

I mean Satanism is just hedonism dressed up as a philosophy instead of being subhuman.

the term “abortion” is mentioned 112 times

get em while they’re young?

and it says “there is no right age to have sex.”

We need age of consent laws to be heavily enforced and set at age of majority, 18.

Classes now where nine-year-old little girls are taught how to put a condom on a plastic penis.”

The purpose of grooming is to shock and brainwash the child about what’s “normal” (said to be common) and implied to be expected of them, called gaslighting. This is how you’d raise a prostitute. Mental abuse and confusion forced about a range of depraved sexual acts people decades ago never heard of.

They’re raping the child’s innocence first. Rape as in to seize, this is abhorrent. We need shame in culture again. If you aren’t mature enough to have children, you shouldn’t be babymaking. This goes for the potential fathers too. Pregnancy is not a disease nor an accident, it’s the intended result of sexual activity.

Calling it “sleeping with” is another weasel term of theirs, call it baby-making because Darwin.

I saw one guy who was sleeping with a woman but too scared of the word “lover” to introduce her as such. He shouldn’t be so much as touching a woman with that immaturity. Take responsibility for your slutting, manwhores.

There’s no research into whether child masturbation is harmful (or not) but it probably is. Odds are it triggers premature puberty and that messes with the genetics’ signalling. Female menarche used to occur around age 17, 18. Premature anything is bad news for development.

You may remember abandoned children, m/f, hit puberty early and it does mess them up.

We really need to segregate schools by sex, mixed schools were a terrible idea.

I hope Trump makes it that parents can sue teachers, starting with the groomers.

Ishtar energy and sexual ruin

Roughly speaking, something to bear in mind.

As for married couples, I’ve noticed a process.

Madonna/Whore comes from the male inability to reconcile the woman he loves with the woman he fucks. They view the wife like a replacement mother and feel disgust or rejection of their desire projected onto the wife, especially if she’s dutiful – they see her fussing over the business of the home and childcare. They disgracefully think lust and love are meant to be separate and always kept separate (this stupid false belief literally causes men health problems inc. impotence and it’s also why they marry sluts). It’s like they think they’re corrupting her with their conjugal rights. It becomes a serious turn-off, like she’s tainted or impure for desiring him (repulsed by her lust) or it isn’t “safe” to sexually express – with their SPOUSE. Husbands CANNOT repress their sexuality and basically rob their wives of that cherishing experience. It ruins marriages, sex is the glue that holds marriage together and while ebbs and flows are normal, either depriving the other, while bad, isn’t as bad as seeking it outside the union (always adultery). That’s a divorce category because it ruins the union, spoils the trust, the connection itself is divorced between the parties. No splitting or the woman senses this and retreats, in passive femininity and trust (how women solve problems), assuming he needs his own space, he’ll come back soon and then he feels abandoned when actually, she’s waiting for him to be the Man first. Because he is. A wife is the most sexual woman. It’s the total experience including fertility, modern men fear the completion of the cycle is the “wrong” thing but actually it’s postmodern sterile sex that’s incomplete* sexuality (and likely causes most of the psychiatric issues associated with promiscuity). Men experience the fulfillment of their sexuality when they become a father, this is why their hormones change for about a year after the wife gives birth!**

Husbands also stop flirting with their wife in modern times, a fact I am certain is a divorce risk… like, no? Why would you think that’s a good idea? The Bible says if you don’t get everything at home you’ll be tempted outside it. Flirt with your damn wife, women are verbal creatures! Women need that verbal affirmation, or society will replace it. Missionary work, crash dieting, various passive-aggressive unconscious punishments that take her energy outside the union and onto worldly things (so not cheating but damn close and it seriously raises the odds she’d escalate to that).

Women get (passive) the verbal (flirting) then men get the physical (sex).

It’s a very simple process and I have to keep explaining this to people. This is old common knowledge. Usually there’s nothing actually “wrong” in the initial stages of marital “problems”, they just don’t flirt! It doesn’t occur to them!!

It isn’t something you do for courting or that kids do.

It’s verbal glue.

You have fewer arguments. Seriously. This is so simple so a therapist (if they know) will NEVER EVER tell you because it’s FREE. Free puts them out of a job.

A husband who wants his wife to be less sexual shouldn’t have married her, frankly. And he can’t expect her to degrade herself, (stares at America) sexuality isn’t doing everything, that’s a sign of a problem where the lust is covering it. There isn’t any shame in marital sex, American Christians need this hammered into their skulls. It isn’t dirty if you’re married. Sex is marriage glue. Repeat this until you know it in your bones.

*Imagine you kept eating and eating and eating food but were never satisfied and actually got more frustrated. Congratulations, sexually, that’s hook-up culture. Nobody says this because they don’t want to offend the single or infertile but sorry, that’s evolution. It’s like saying we need air to breathe, it could offend people with breathing problems but so what? Doesn’t change the fact.

Ancient times measured sexual encounters as satisfactory based on whether or not they were “fruitful”. They knew. Those were incredibly patriarchal societies, well, this is the kernel of truth behind all patriarchy.

You don’t see the father of five wishing he had two.

It’s also why broody men in our culture are shamed as patriarchal.

**And miscarriage or infertility can provoke divorce. In biological terms, you fall in love for two years to conceive and then the parental bond is the heightened connection, the sight of proven fertility, parental oxytocin from interactions. I wonder if childless marriages (by choice) are also a divorce risk, I’d assume so since it replicates infertility.

Random but I wonder if a Roe v Wade repeal would include the Pill abortifacient? Biologically, it must. It’s a chronic Morning After pill, another chemical abortion. Both are given to minors, more grounds.

Video: 10 arguments against pre-marital sex

or fornication, if you dislike PC terms.

Pleasantly surprised by this logic.

Yes, promiscuity x divorce risk must be studied more, actually. Much more. One major issue mathematically is how few promiscuous marry AT ALL to even qualify for the studies so marital rate too (since that’s important information for people). Then psychological issues round out the methodology for the ones that predispose to those behaviors in the first place (not a free choice, a compulsion) and muddy the waters in the non-pathological population (i.e. not personality disorders).

It seems to operate by weakening pair bonds until the person is incapable of making them.

I know AC would agree with me that an amygdala atrophy study in the promiscuous and also divorced groups would be illuminating. Imagine if you can check divorce risk with a brain scan before marriage!

And once developed, can it ever shrink or is gain permanent?

comment

This is an old truth that has been only relatively recently abandoned. The reasons for all Christian principles are entirely practical. There is a saying ‘you are not punished for your sins, but by them

The big lie spoken by manwhores in particular is that ruining themselves emotionally (and physically) will make them better husbands for the right woman. The feminists carbon copied that rationalization, it’s still bullshit. How does adding psychological issues make you better in any way? And why should your spouse have to clean up the messes left by a trail of people who hurt you? And if you were remorseless and mistreated, abandoned them, what’s to stop you doing it to your spouse? Why reward that with love and fidelity?

Some people are incapable of loving and therefore don’t deserve to be loved.

Unequal yokes are abusive.

In romantic/sexual relationships, what doesn’t kill you makes you weaker.

“Muh Experience” is the idiot’s way of claiming that learning everything wrong will make them right. It’s insanity. This isn’t a pop quiz you can redo, it’s your life; it isn’t a game you can respawn into ad nauseum, you are learning patterns and reactions and if they don’t work, you’re far, far worse off than the person with NO “experience” – this is Dunning-Kruger.

Experience of failure means you’re wrong. You’re the common denominator.

The definition of insanity is the man who fucks around and wonders why he can’t find marriage material.

Hook-up culture has trained men into being useless husbands, they have the opposite required qualities.

To put it crassly, they’re saying “I shit in the pool, why is the water brown?”

Where have all the good women gone? Well, how many women have you slept with? Subtract those from the communal pool. Now extrapolate.

No, you can’t Have It All. You never could, it was a Boomer marketing gimmick. But the economy (and GDP) make more money from cads than dads. The politicians are playing them. They don’t care about you. They don’t care if you’re a genetic dead-end.

These useful idiots would literally argue the man who fucks 100 women and finds no love (0/100) is better husband material than a man who fucked zero women and also found no love yet, the unproven quantity. Narcissists lie.

Lust doesn’t lead to love, it leads to personal disgust. Hollywood lied so you’d sell your soul buying their stuff to fill the emptiness of your single life. They can’t admit it without the self-loathing attacking them so they blame the “thots” in standard projection and denial of agency. If you’re so easily led into temptation, you’re too weak to call yourself a man.

If you treat your love life like a game, women will see you as a joke.

Fornication discouraged in men, 1892

I don’t like it when SJWs lie about sexuality and pretend men could be the biggest sluts they wanted, forever, without consequence.
I don’t like it when men lie about their historic sexual habits either. There’s no excuse.

I was going to quote but screencaps deter liars. This was the common opinion and backed by the doctors of the time. They just can’t stand the idea their ancestors would be ashamed of them and think of them as just as slutty as the women they insult.

I guess their red pill got stuck?

Continence (sexual control) and sexual hygiene were the rule throughout history, we hear about exceptions because they were exceptions.

(And rich, usually rich and insane, it’s still fun to read about those).

https://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b28050964#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0&z=-0.6656%2C0.8599%2C2.8112%2C1.4224

Act like a savage, think like one. Pretty straightforward. Lust isn’t a virtue for men either. Giving in to any desire is a huge display of weakness.

The energy is meant to go to your development. Wasting it elsewhere stunts growth permanently. Degenerate is quite a physical phenomena. If you took identical twins, one would be taller, better-looking and healthier for abstaining compared to a profligate twin.

It does stunt the growth, they’re right. Neuroscience is finding (supernormal) stimulation is really, really bad for you, especially if you’re still developing – the development time is cut prematurely short because the energy gets burnt up. You have a finite supply. Puberty is meant to take many years. Telling men to masturbate, that it’s good for them, might be the first nail in the masculine coffin (same applies for women).

A retardation of your mature sex’s qualities. It’s horrendous.

The best-looking and sounding men I’ve ever seen simply had no desire to masturbate as teenagers (they were busy doing other things). They turned out really well, the so-called “late bloomer” just used to be… normal. By comparison, we all know plenty of people who peaked physically age fifteen then weirdly aged at speed.

Guess what they have in common.

It’s also no coincidence the best geniuses are virgins.

To this day, the life outcomes of those with impulse control are superior, including general health.

Suck on that.

If you want a biological mechanism for this, look into how caloric restriction works. Your body has finite life processing power. Don’t waste it.

Most self-help books for men came in the form of morality lessons.
https://archive.org/details/dangersignals00clar
https://archive.org/details/advicetoyoungmen01cobb

Because they needed it.

No man is beyond reproach.

Video: Sin is a disease

Sexual hygiene will make a comeback, whether you like it or not.

Like, you learn to wash your hands or keep dying of cholera.

The Sexual “Revolution” will be seen as a mass murderer in times to come.

Stereotypes are true. Those people are shunned (including a perception of inferiority to one another!) due to social contagion.

What is allowed (not punished) becomes implicitly good.

The gold standard logical test applies: if everyone did this, would society collapse?

Because yes, no individual should either. It involves other people so it isn’t actually an individual choice. It requires corruption, always evil. Since society pays (on disease load alone) then it isn’t actually a personal claim, it’s a withdrawal from the public good.

Yes, tragedy of the commons applies to moral goods in society.
You want other people to stop being dicks on the road but act like one yourself.

Society keeps rewarding sin because chaos makes money.

It keeps the economy consuming and GDP high enough to tread water.
e.g.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-44802123

It can’t last, it won’t last, understand why.

Random but they always look weird, like middle-aged but plastic smooth?

It’s like a circus freakshow, I swear.

HPV in the brain

Yes, in.

http://www.miriamgrossmanmd.com/say-its-not-so-hpv-in-the-brain/

“We know that HPV can cross the placenta and infect the fetus. In one study, this happened in over twelve per cent of women with HPV.”

As always it’s the innocent who suffer.
The sins of the father…

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+34%3A7&version=ESV

“keeping steadfast love for thousands,[a] forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation.”

And before you think I’m man-hating, no.

It’s the data.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/half-adult-males-carry-hpv
“The virus notorious for causing cervical cancer in women also turns up frequently in men and can hang on unnoticed for months or even years, researchers report online March 1 in Lancet. The study solidifies earlier research indicating that human papillomavirus is highly prevalent in men and strengthens the case for vaccinating men and boys against it, the report’s authors say.”

Imagine my shock.

“The study, in the Annals of Internal Medicine, found that 11 million men and 3.2 million women in the United States had oral HPV infections. Among them, 7 million men and 1.4 million women had strains that can cause cancers of the throat, tongue and other areas of the head and neck.”
“The rate was higher among men who also had genital HPV. (Almost half of men aged 18 to 60 have a genital HPV infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.)”

TLDR?

It’s a male-carried disease.
By far (that was a 5:1 male to female ratio, deny it).

7/1.4=5 for the illiterates at home.

https://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv-and-men.htm
The penile cancer risk for men goes unmentioned. Some informed consent, right? Feel empowered yet?
No, there is currently no approved test for HPV in men.”
Routine testing (also called ‘screening’) to check for HPV or HPV-related disease before there are signs or symptom, is not recommended by the CDC”
They want the men to spread it.

Back to the original doctor.

This is major news, and I’m wondering – why no headlines about it? There were no press conferences with Dr Crino, and no statements from SIECUS or Planned Parenthood, our leaders in “comprehensive” sexuality education.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

There’s a double standard at work: if research suggested that sugary drinks cause fetal malformations, it surely would be announced with alarm by every media outlet.

Cover-up isn’t a double standard but okay.

With sexual health it’s always been different. The negative consequences of sexual license are often ignored or minimized. Young people are led to believe that with condoms and STI testing they’re safe, or safe enough. But it’s not so.

“Free lust” is anything but free of consequences. If only the Bible mentioned fornication and how sinning against oneself is different.

I believe that one day there will be congressional hearings about the persistent whitewashing of STIs, the exaggerated efficacy of condoms, and the endorsement by sex educators of high risk behaviors. Until then, the madness continues.”

One day there might be real science, we can all dream!

They make so much money off pelvic exams, which by the way, were pioneered in Nazi concentration camps!

And that’s just the tip of the hooker berg.
It was the same with syphilis and other diseases. Men would catch it, usually from hookers and infect their wife (or eventual wife) and their children would have medical issues (look up the syphilis skulls). Deliberate honeypots for this purpose would bring down an entire nation quickly via its leaders. Wouldn’t it, France?

We have DNA testing to trace precise strains of types but that’s small comfort.

If you can get it from a handshake or a peck on the cheek (children, Europeans) nobody is safe.

Peterson supports shekels

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2018/06/02/peterson-cant-handle-the-truth/

You think he doesn’t know?

They pay him through the nose in private to tell them what they wanna hear.

He said the “best way to deceive someone is a (tiny) slice of the truth” (intellectually dishonest).

I’m starting to think I should autoplay Disney’s Let it Go on this blog.

This is apropos to 90% of my content, it’s commentary on the inevitable.

Bachelors are the most reliable source of income, think about it!

Everybody’s Business is Nobody’s Business by Daniel Defoe

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2052/2052-h/2052-h.htm

This is amazing.

If she be tolerably handsome, and has any share of cunning, the apprentice or her master’s son is enticed away and ruined by her.  Thus many good families are impoverished and disgraced by these pert sluts, who, taking the advantage of a young man’s simplicity and unruly desires, draw many heedless youths, nay, some of good estates, into their snares; and of this we have but too many instances.

Yes, the poor young men.

Knowing that Defoe wrote the phrase “pert sluts” intentionally gives me life.

It’s like one gigantic rant, I’m serious.

Some more artful shall conceal their condition, and palm themselves off on young fellows for gentlewomen and great fortunes.  How many families have been ruined by these ladies?

That’s a good point, we have too many pert sluts passing themselves off as ladies, and the male equivalents.

when the father or master of the family, preferring the flirting airs of a young prinked up strumpet, to the artless sincerity of a plain, grave, and good wife, has given his desires aloose, and destroyed soul, body, family, and estate.  But they are very favourable if they wheedle nobody into matrimony, but only make a present of a small live creature, no bigger than a bastard, to some of the family, no matter who gets it; when a child is born it must be kept.

Men are dumb.

This is how the r-genes spread.

Adultery is a mortal sin because it reduces the fitness of your legitimate children, that you owe the duty to (and nobody else has to pick up after). The money that goes on the bastard should be invested in your real spawn. You owe no religious, moral duty to the children of a mother you never married (when the oath for the duty is sworn and signed). In purely religious terms, the marital union is the only place of obligation, above anything else.

This acceptance of bastards would explain how aristocracy becomes decadent – the genes come from adultery.

Notice: it’s a class thing, he is equally enraged by the follies of men behaving below their station.

The Romans had a law called Jus Trium Liberorum, by which every man who had been a father of three children, had particular honours and privileges.  This incited the youth to quit a dissolute single life and become fathers of families, to the support and glory of the empire.