Post-war population recovery genes

Men are literally replaceable and that makes them better as a sex.

Exhibit A in the scientific “Men ain’t shit” series.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081211121835.htm

In many of the countries that fought in the World Wars, there was a sudden increase in the number of boys born afterwards. The year after World War I ended, an extra two boys were born for every 100 girls in the UK, compared to the year before the war started. The gene, which Mr Gellatly has described in his research, could explain why this happened.

As the odds were in favour of men with more sons seeing a son return from the war, those sons were more likely to father boys themselves because they inherited that tendency from their fathers. In contrast, men with more daughters may have lost their only sons in the war and those sons would have been more likely to father girls. This would explain why the men that survived the war were more likely to have male children, which resulted in the boy-baby boom.

In most countries, for as long as records have been kept, more boys than girls have been born. In the UK and US, for example, there are currently about 105 males born for every 100 females.

It is well-documented that more males die in childhood and before they are old enough to have children.

That is prior to competition, crime, psychiatric issues including self-loathing and desire to never reproduce, as well as the sexual selection of women for a suitable man.

Externalities like the economy, racial wars, anti-natal culture notwithstanding.

The female genome is more stable, two Xs will do that. It contains more data too, the Y is smaller.

Women must be more stable biologically as the (genetic) carrier sex, another reason against female drafting. If some men die, they clearly recover (and as proven here, come back better) but when a race loses its women, it goes extinct.

So in the same way that the gene may cause more boys to be born after wars, it may also cause more boys to be born each year.

The fitter male lines are self-replacing.  This is why all adult men should have been drafted. The reward of winning a war should be reproducing into your society’s future, to reward the cowards who remained behind is an insult to the brave K-types of the sex.

This is the red-pill. Men evolved to be expendable to one another in the protection of their shared racial germline.

Cowards know they’re cannon fodder. They betray their fellow man (intra-racial Brotherhood is the only acceptable collectivism). It reminds me of the Little Red Hen, and what man would want a coward in their ranks, that’s treason waiting to happen?

Or as we call them, cucks.

Behold, the back-up genetic programme: the self-culling cannon fodder.
Remarkable that genetic dead-ends appreciate the importance of marriage enough to insult all married couples as inferior (rationalization).

Also, demographic decline virtue signalling (- you can’t out-breed Asia, war is inevitable).

Asia*: highest population density, territorial expansive, fastest growing religion (Islam).

Inevitable.

Trump could shit gold and it’s still inevitable.

Why?

More than r-selection, perhaps a feature of it.

If you’re stupid like Asians and murder your girls (glaring at India and China) then you cull the female-preferred genes among men, slowly killing your racial future because there won’t be enough carrier women to go around and the ‘problem’ will only get worse. There is no culling effect equivalent to war in women except socialist policy.

There’s your ‘war against women’. Affirmative Action for unfit male genes collapses both their group and the fit men of their race who were weak enough to allow it to happen. If every man is entitled to 1 waifu thanks to socialist compulsion (and all men, all women forced to marry by law**) but five infant boys survive due to medical technology…. 100-105=-5

Socialism’s birth policies are as dysgenic as their economics that punish effort.
This is why men shouldn’t decide who gets to breed with laws, women evolved for that task.

Socialism cannot replace sexual selection. What the internet considers it is not, reproduction is required.

A war will be mandatory if the leftover men have any hope of reproduction, by conquest and rape  …..and ‘immigration’.

*As previously covered, most money to purchase is loaned by the Chinese Communist government. They are the true buyers overseas. Ban foreigners from literally buying your country. It’s a matter of national security. That includes the Putin-banished Russians’ blood money in London keeping the gasping death rattle of a real estate bubble alive. I’d extend this to the compulsory purchase of properties made by shell corps overseas, with unexplained funds (anti-corruption law) or belonging to dual passport holders who refuse to drop the other one (loyalty to another nation).

The concrete used in protected property basements is doomed to collapse. Like the postmodern glass monstrosities, they all crumble eventually, that’s why huge basements aren’t built in English soil. Rainy, flood-prone soil. Next to the biggest river incoming to the landmass.

And we get frequent earthquakes, of the sort that causes cracks in… concrete.

It’s a capital city so traffic causes tremors too – including planes.

Every heinous skyscraper you ever see will be self-destructing. Rich tower or council estate.

https://www.cement.org/docs/default-source/fc_concrete_technology/durability/is536-types-and-causes-of-concrete-deterioration.pdf

I’m literally the first person to look this up. Engineers study ENTROPY.

This error is old as Babel. We don’t need to lift a finger, ugly postmodern structures are already crumbling.

They’ll go the way of wooden castles.

Shad viewers? Anyone?

If only the Nazis had simply purchased American land, we’d be speaking German.

They’re still going to shoot you by the way. They need to outnumber you, fill University places then government positions first. If they have the land, all that’s needed are executions.

**Reducing citizens to breeding sows for the government, thanks, socialism!

Socialism is hence r-select and among other issues, assumes all men can be provider husbands, all women are fertile and all citizens are heterosexual. Socialism is doomed to fail by virtue of mathematics and basic biology.

Why is the UK property market fake?

https://cyberlibris.typepad.com/blog/files/Goodharts_Law.pdf

No more corset controls on the banks since 1979/80. Goodhart pre-empted it.

Now they loan to things that don’t boost GDP including mortgages.

It’s included in debt to GDP though.

Boosted in addition to the retarded notion of a crumbling hovel being a “retirement” fund.

Funds and other assets don’t depreciate.

Don’t bail out bad property investors, they’re idiots.

You wanted the reward, the risk is also ALL yours.

The ‘competition and credit control’ reforms, which removed direct controls on bank
lending, had been introduced in September 1971 and a dramatic surge in bank
intermediation, leading to broad money growth rates in excess of 25%, had resulted in
1972 and 1973. The conclusion drawn by policy makers in 1973 was that the only
option was to supplement monetary targets with direct controls on banks through
Supplementary Special Deposits known as ‘the Corset’ (See Zawadzki, 1981).
Modest interest rate changes seemed powerless in the face of this monetary expansion
and the previously stable money demand function seemed to have broken down. This
was clear well before 1975, but Goodhart (1975b) was a summary of the current
problems of monetary management, as the title suggests.

So Labour want rent controls but not bank controls.

I wonder (((why))).

Goodhart’s Law is the statement missing from the square brackets in the quotation
above. It says: “Ignoring Goodhart’s law, that any observed statistical regularity
will tend to collapse once pressure is placed upon it for control purposes”.

“Houses as Collateral”
https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/02v08n1/0205aoki.pdf
“First were the removal of exchange controls in 1979 and the direct control of bank lending (“the corset”) in 1980″

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.600.6032&rep=rep1&type=pdf
“The abolition of exchange controls in 1979 and the abolition of the last of the quantitative controls on bank lending heralded a period of rapid deregulation and increased competition in British banking during the 1980s”

They weren’t more productive in the 80s, they stole from the future (you).

Isn’t property tax, rent?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-15/resource-nationalism-its-coming

It does pay to make a list of all the things you fear could happen in the next ten years and check each year if any happened so you know you didn’t imagine it.

comment
“..its simple. The Rothschilds own all the resources, through their shell corporations.
It’s long past time to ARREST THE ROTHSCHILDS AND SEIZE ALL THEIR STOLEN ASSETS.”
That’ll happen anyway.

Bring on the thorium before it’s too late.

Property tax must be stopped, we can solicit all the utilities privately.
And to tax the childless for other people’s children is a theft of child support, it’s a fraud.
Communism relies on property tax because it implies the State will always be the true owner of property.
Isn’t it rent to politicians? They shouldn’t be able to confiscate something they don’t own.
http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
It used to be that anyone can open a bank, can’t do that now either.
State schooling also keeps kids out of the workforce from competing with the low IQ. The tax burden on the parents is heavier so nannies take over and they too are taxed. The child learns you don’t have to work to be looked after, by the State. Affection for teachers overtake filial loyalty.
Every Empire is destroyed by pensions, all nations are growing them like a tumour on the young.
Given all these facts, the Government should pay you to take on property (where you become responsible for maintenance and choose to take on the impossible tax burden).

You don’t truly “own” it and it is an imposition on human rights to charge someone to live, since we all must live somewhere and stamp duty should be the one tax on that land, bundled.

To see who will sink straight to the bottom, look at mortgage fraud again.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/2112873/chinas-household-debts-soars-it-being-stalked-subprime-spectre
What happens when you let communists pretend to be successful.

“Thanks to the easy credit that has spurred the housing boom, many young Chinese have abandoned the frugal traditions of earlier generations and now lead a lifestyle beyond their financial means.
The build-up of household and other debt in China has also sparked widespread concern about the health of the world’s second largest economy.”

“Government policies are also protecting the interests of homeowners. City governments have squeezed land supply to keep land prices high

Communists

and made secondary market trading less attractive, with new home buyers left to compete for a few new developments. Meanwhile, there is no property tax, which encourages homeowners to hold on to appreciating property assets.

Sure, that won’t change. If you see free food in the forest, what trap?

Pension fraud, mortgage fraud, energy dependence, food security issues.

“But the figure could be misleading because it failed to reflect regional differences and it under-reported many hidden family debts in China,

not an honour culture, a liar culture
Who cares if you’re deceitful, as long as nobody knows?

a recent report by the Institute for Advanced Research at Shanghai University of Finance and Economics said.”

Just in case you think the old people can afford to bail out the kids when they need to eat.

“China’s first home buyers are, on average, younger than those elsewhere in the world, with most of those in Shenzhen in their 20s and 30s.”

They can’t tax the young to save their economy. The money is already gone.

Should you feel sorry for frauds?

Mai has lent 600,000 of the 800,000 yuan he got from a bank after using his first flat as collateral to a money shark promising an annualised return of 20 per cent. Wang gave the bank fake documents showing her monthly income was 18,000 yuan – about 1.6 times her actual salary. It did not ask any questions.
Neither see any problem, because the value of their underlying assets, the flats, have risen.
The value of Mai’s two flats rose from 3.8 million yuan last year to 6.4 million yuan last month, while the value of Wang’s unit is now 2.93 million yuan, up from 2.6 million yuan.
“I think I made a smart and successful decision to leverage debt,” Mai said.”


Nah.

Let ’em burn.

Why is UK property price rising?

Rich foreigners.

old article but true

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35757265

As I’ve said before, boy will they get a shock when our government just fails to acknowledge their property rights (as non-citizens).

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/11/25/whats-going-on-in-greece/

“You think the Greeks are going to get off their arses for you, when they won’t do it for their grandkids?

The West and EU is pumping them full of worthless money.
It’s hilarious, they think we’re actually trading with them.
We can just confiscate back national resources for national security.

We do it already to our own citizens, you aren’t fucking special.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/your-property-and-compulsory-purchase
Slavery is also illegal, you can start a war with our superior military if you want, bitches!
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/30/pdfs/ukpga_20150030_en.pdf

Three-quarters of properties being purchased are purchased in secret, that’s wrong – it ought to be completely transparent,” says group member, Labour peer Jeff Rooker.

Agreed.

A house isn’t an investment, it doesn’t change. It actually depreciates.

Population does change.

They’re gambling.

This will make ownership through UK companies more transparent, but won’t affect overseas companies investing in London.

It should be the other way around.

Not to mention the crooked politicians allowing purchases and planning permission, flouting skyline rules and many others.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-curse-of-666-fifth-avenue-the-skyscraper-that-could-sink-the-kushners

Look at the Skyscraper Index too. China is fucked.

A lot of those skyscrapers and flats will simply be torn down. They were illegally built.

“A palace second in size only to Buckingham Palace, it was sold for £50m to an offshore company registered in the British Virgin Islands,” says our guide, and tells us it will soon become home to a Russian oligarch.

No it won’t, it’s easy to kick out false kings from their little ill-gotten palaces.

I hear the noise of diggers and machinery building a spa and a private underground car park. A neighbour walking the dog nearby mutters how disruptive this has been and how the trees have been cut down.

That’s why you don’t let foreigners literally buy your country.

The government and politicians and sellers are traitors, they are literally selling their country out.

Russians aren’t even really white, FFS. New Money will end up dirt poor as they deserve. Don’t let them ruin our few good buildings in the mean time.

But this kind of disruption could soon be curtailed if increasing clarity on ownership puts off future buyers.

the love of money is the root of all evil

Eternal growth is an economist’s myth.

You know the only thing that grows eternally? Cancer.

The US, another attractive location for anonymous property purchases, has tightened regulations recently. The US Treasury department announced two months ago that it would start identifying the anonymous buyers of luxury properties, particularly in New York and Miami.

start?

This measure follows the introduction of a strict new anti-money laundering regulations, which have led to the US authorities to impose hefty fines on major banks.

no let them fail

The pressure to shut down avenues of money laundering and tax evasion could also mean property purchases here soon come under tougher scrutiny.

could?

And then our tour guides will be able to pack up and go home.

Russian writer …no conflict of interest.

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/02/move-over-royal-family-londons-oligarchs-are-the-new-tourist-attraction/

Yes, let all the white-collar criminals live here too. Fantastic.

Russian oligarchs suspected of corruption in UK must account for wealth and property

That should be done before purchase as part of a background check.

Let it crash, please God just let them all hit their real level.

Socialist China bans overseas property investment

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-06-22/the-100-billion-city-next-to-singapore-has-a-big-china-problem

I’m picturing crabs in a bucket.

Like a crazy ex, you’re not allowed to leave. Maybe they should fix the culture at home if they dislike it so much.

I’m certain the luxe apartment bubble should be a secondary Skyscraper Index, based on height alone. Elevators rely on the electricity grid. In a grid-down, they’d be stranded.

Meanwhile, London

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/golden-age-of-booming-london-house-prices-is-over-warns-report-a3673361.html

Cheaper housing, how awful of those pesky Leave voters.

Meanwhile, China tries to buy London’s history

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-17/chinese-pile-into-bargain-london-property-on-post-brexit-pound

yes lestat dancing happy cheery morbid black comedy

They are going to lose all their money.

You never bet against London.

It’s like warring with Russia.

You just don’t.

Think of it this way. If it’s a surefire way to make money off this country, why is it legal?

Still, the Guardian readers will continue to argue this is a good thing, because globalism but secretly wish their ‘rents would just die already. Joke is also firmly on them, as most real estate held by the middle class is heavily indebted. They do not know this. Those exceptions cannot manage an estate, having no head for maths.

This is gonna be glorious.

It’s only worth what somebody is willing to pay after you.
If you won’t live in it, it’s worthless.

Rule #1 Buy low.

Rule #2 Never buy something you can’t use.

Nobody told them rule 2.

I love parvenus. They’re so easy to con.