Link: Why do cuckservatives treat Jews like children?

http://nwioqeqkdf.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/get-women-jews-to-safety.html

It’s patronising. Nobody owes them anything nor they us.

They’re adults. They’re responsible for themselves.

They don’t need protection or defending from White men. White women and children do.

Jewish men can protect their women and children too. That’s the natural order.

It’s a very odd marker of cuckservatism. This priority. Like, in a forced choice, would they let a white woman and baby die to save a middle-aged Jewish man? Very racist if you think about it. They’re people too, not pets.

They aren’t even European, they’re Middle Eastern. For those trying to excuse this via religion, even Jesus didn’t stay a Jew, did he? He recruited for another religion too. Those were His People. He protected them. As I recall, he was quite angry with merchants and money lenders and there was a nasty incident where he went spare with a whip.

Which laws kept marriages intact?

It is easy to say the modern legal system is unfair, unjust and the various issues with it are causing the social breakdown we know too well. Here are some of the laws which kept the sexes in line, and marriage thereafter. Their loss has caused recognisable problems.

To avoid players or lying cads promising marriage to good women

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_promise

To prevent gossip by competition, especially where truthful

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_confidence

To prevent bitter rivals (possibly male) or spinsters dissolving a union once made

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienation_of_affections

To promote emotional intimacy and the ‘dependency paradox’ vital for a permanent relationship

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy

The spouse should become the centre but not the whole Universe. Family business and home matters don’t leak to outsiders who twist the knife while things are down (natural ups and downs) and never let a good time go without passive-aggression.

Includes land law in

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtilage

For an obligation of honesty going into marriage – “freely offered” – they know what they’re getting into

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misrepresentation

Prenuptial agreements should be legally binding I really don’t see the point otherwise. It misrepresents the litigant as not a gold-digger and then they can turn around and say “it doesn’t count, I didn’t mean it”?

This is widely applicable from many parties and SJWs do this for monstering, bring it back with criminal libel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_light

Most vital of all, this ensures sexual fidelity in BOTH parties as agreed in their vows, reduces cuckoldry to nil and guarantees financial support between parties (not paid out to mistresses or bastard children).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_conversation

The tort of criminal conversation seeks damages for the act of sexual intercourse outside marriage, between the spouse and a third party. Each act of adultery can give rise to a separate claim for criminal conversation.

This values the commitment. Dollar value. Bring it back.

It’s a matter of time until the feminists bring back

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seduction_(tort)

for men who lie to get sex (like, all 99.999% of them).

Protection from adultery is the crucial means of safeguarding marriage for future generations. Without this, what is the point? Nobody forces you to make a commitment in this century, the choice should have legal weight on both sides. The K-types care about marriage and must protect their mating strategy from predatory r-types, either as their spouse or the cheating third party. Marriage must be inoculated from the ravishes of the sexual marketplace.