Could psychopathy be behind the history of white greatness?

I find it funny there are Europeans in Canada who…. idolize Europe….
but stay in Canada…..

oh come on my god why NO kill me now

unless you’re setting up an Empire, no. [1]

http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2017/01/source-of-faustian-west.html

It isn’t a male thing either, you need both sexes to make a healthy society or it dies.

But what is it about Europeans that gives us this high ‘tendency towards the infinite,’ as Spengler put it? What is the source of what he called the ‘Faustian’ spirit of the West?

Probably not.

I think they mean the personality trait psychoticism, completely different and not a mental illness.

It relates to genius and risk-taking.

It fits.

It slots in perfectly.

Please do that research.

I think we also suffered great national losses to those positive prosocial traits during both World Wars, while the cowards and infirm sat home twiddling their thumbs. It would explain the social discrepancy between new demographics, where it’s hard to believe we ever did any of those great things, and  the old demographics, where the news was full of various discoveries, inventions and explorations.

blow kiss.gif

Associated with creativity, this psychopathic competition for glory and esteem, evolved men who restlessly found a way to go beyond whatever was currently considered rational or possible, inventing new concepts, abilities and technologies.

That’s completely and utterly wrong. ‘Associated with’- Yes, murder is associated with life.
You mean psychoticism, not psychopathy. Don’t be one of those sad-acts who idealizes the dregs of society because TV told you they wear cool suits and get all the babes (no and no). In reality, if you read Hare’s books, they’re outcasts, they are losers who die young and deserve it. The paragraph is a fairytale and I feel dumber for reading it. Don’t just pluck a disease out of thin air and pretend it’s a good thing. You’re studying personality, look at personality dynamics.

evolved men” no
you can’t just evolve one sex
that isn’t how evolution works

Look at any successful ancient civilization and both sexes were great e.g. Sparta.
Femininity isn’t an excuse for weakness.

Genius isn’t an illness, repeat that until you internalize it; it’s a lie the elite have always claimed to keep their own power. GENIUS IS NOT A PATHOLOGY. THERE IS NO PATHOLOGY FOR GENIUS.

There is one disease truly associated with creativity and that’s bipolar disorder, there is plenty of neuro-scientific evidence, including GENETIC,

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/19/intelligence-creativity-and-bipolar-disorder-may-share-underlying-genetics

up to entire books, for that one single connection but that doesn’t sound cool so you won’t see these guys claim it. Also, women have it too, have you noticed certain sections of the internet keep trying to claim that women are all crazy (gaslighting), womens’ diseases (by heavy-skew prevalence) are all bad and all characteristically female (as if men don’t have emotions etc) and furthermore, there is NO male disease (fucking borderlines, I’m tellin’ ya) apparently, it’s all one big conspiracy (uhuh) and that any male disease is in fact, good for society? Ignore facts, logic and the swathe of evidence in the destruction caused by these men, apparently we’re meant to let them off the hook cos they are male and ‘boys will be boys’? That is true, but adult men are not boys. I think they need to study the Medical Model before they go claiming this shit like an SJW or maybe the dictionary definition of disease.

Point of fact, bipolar just have super high openness, a personality trait. It isn’t even their clinical disorder either. Psychos have the opposite, they’re closed-minded and never change, they make the same stupid mistakes over and over and over again, like a movie villain, based on the type. They have no common sense. They are thick. Can you find a single study showing psychopaths have high IQ? No, you cannot. Sociopaths maybe, but they’re a timid milquetoast version, like comparing a modern, smoothie-swilling athlete to an ancient soldier.

Point of fact, psychopaths are the most UN-original people you will ever meet, they’re that guy stealing credit for the slightest things like an idea in a meeting, and they save their own skin before anyone else. Stop treating them like superheroes, if you met one you’d hate him. They’re angry, broken people who hurt other people because it distracts them, they have no nobility or even basic moral values. The words mean nothing to them.

1 The EU is actually a European Empire, but it failed because it’s Commie-run. Every time I hear their “dream of a United Europe” I think yeah – so did Hitler. Except that guy was determined to go anywhere but Europe, and that’s why he lost. They’re making a similar mistake, taking care of basically anybody except native Europeans. Stop looking out. Clean house first. Otherwise, nothing out there matters.

Tech journo Milo Yiannopoulos has lost his claim to ethics

When he does an opinion piece on a point of active science. (Minus experts to support his specious claims). I have lost my former high regard for him. He became a sophist. Oh, the things I am sent by infuriated research psychologists. You should see how blue the air turned at this one.

Title: Sorry girls! But the smartest people in the world are all men!

Think of the stereotype of trolling - white straight male aka Patriarchy. Did they appropriate the term?
(patronizing Buzzfeed-esque address)+(claim to scientific authority against presumed naive reader)+(geniuses+polymaths subgroup)
= claim: no women (ever, at present or in future)

Operative absolute highlighted for your scorn.

I won’t link to the troll and the article is a patronizing piece of shit. You can tell he has no critical training in the field of data interpretation even if you took a drunken night class 10 years ago for a semester. It’s that painfully bad. Either he didn’t do the research (his actual job) into the history of females in that group, or he would’ve immediately found this, to look for the negative evidence, the black swan OR he knew, he bloody knew and left it out. The disclaimer required. The distinction to be made. One line:

It is fine to critique performance, but impossible to disprove potential.

Rarity speaks nothing of ability. As we say, to omit this distinction would remove all claim to both internal and external validity. Rendering it totally invalid….?
The ethical obligation (journalists take training courses) must have …slipped his mind. To get the clicks from the fake MGTOWs putting down women (a group) as if that has anything to do with individual variance (themselves), as I’ve stated before in excruciating take-down style detail. I believe someone actually linked to me for it, I see clicks on the traffic.
He’s become the enemy, a clickwhore lying about science for political grievance (his ‘side’ doesn’t make it right). He cherry-picked a study like Anita does with male violence and his foundation of relative morality has evaporated.
It would be as specious, unethical and rampantly dishonest as if I had said that, say, drugged-up Ritalin boys were innately retarded instead of <insert alternative nurtured explanation here>.

I guess you could say, it’s about ethics in psychometrics journalism.

burn gif

After his great and professional work on Gamergate and he pulls this shit.

tyra rooting for you
I feel so betrayed, and I’d been defending him to people, too.

Wikipedia could prove this bitch wrong. WIKIPEDIA. THINK ABOUT THAT.
Here are the actual categories and stratification of IQ scores. Look at the words.

IQcategories1 IQcategories2 IQcategories3

IQcategories4 IQcategories5

I guess the whole research field is fucking wrong, and Milo Yiannopoulos is right.
#GalileoGambit I guess no adult woman is in the Superior Group over IQ130.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=girl+mensa+age&tbm=nws
Pass Go. Collect your Nobel.

I made a chart too, Milo! About my opinion, of your opinion!

fucksgivenme

The IFLScientism Crowd will be totes impressed! Because the scientific method is like Mythbusters, anyone can do it! If you do a random thing, like find a thing and write about it, you can throw on a lab coat and call it a day. You earned that degree, that PhD in Internetz. If I write in a diary about an ice cream I just consumed, it’s science! And going by your logic, nobody can claim otherwise! If I claim the ice cream opened a portal to another dimension, and made a moral value judgement that it was, in fact, evil, an evil ice cream, I am under no positive Burden of Proof for this negative opinion, in fact, the burden shifts onto everyone else! Isn’t science fun? You can just make it up, all day! It counts! And I made charts so it’s legit, fam! It has Hindu numerals and shit!
Because dissent isn’t the natural process of scientific progress or anything, it’s a conspiracy theory like Patriarchy!

You would think that a technology journalist, who rely on personal popularity, wouldn’t alienate half the STEM field? How is this a plan for career longevity, exactly? I know people who are now blacklisting him for this, since he clearly doesn’t expect people he works with, in-industry, to have read it.

Milo, if you’re reading this;tyra take responsibility

UPDATE: 48h later, I can see comments defending Milo for the article.
Comments from feminists. I leave you to your conclusions.