Misogynists are just bitchy entitled brats

They act like a bitchy woman. They do not act straight.

e.g. As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality.

Respectful to friends and superiors, never to ugly women or inferiors. Very antisocial personality.

e.g. He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.

Narc triangulation, men say he’s good, women say he’s bad. Narc sucks up attention.

r-types, like Labour pitting Muslims against Christians. Whoever wins, will vote for Labour.

“He’s such a nice guy” – red flag, nice to men = evil to women. Men are meant to compete.

It’s a perversion of gender role.

A guy like that tried ignoring me once, thinking I’d decided to go out with him after being pressured. (nope) Treat them mean and all. Like I said, “didn’t even notice”. Really, actually, didn’t. Since he was playing the female role, why would I? I’m not the man.

If I were a dyke, I still wouldn’t notice him, a male. It STILL makes no sense, to this day.

Answers on a postcard. If they liked ‘strong independent (manly) women’, one keyword there is independent.

He threw a tantrum about me ‘missing him’ (almost stranger) and it being a ‘test’ (not a single date) and stomped off, half-expecting me to chase him. It was comical. His dick was not valuable. Dick is not a rare commodity. Turned out to be a nutjob. Shocker. I’d actually felt better when he wasn’t around, this is why they can’t be the woman.

They treat women mean and act like women (schoolgirls who won’t talk to you), then complain when the woman leaves. They believe affection must be tinged with abuse. Trauma bonds formed by control and gaslighting aren’t love, stupid bitches. Any secure person will run for the hills over broken glass.

“Nice Guy” – repressed rage (usually left-wing, white guilt and Asian fetish) and kinda gay.

An Asian Nice Guy would have guilt with a White fetish, Anglo culture obsession (opposite of weeb).

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201502/12-ways-spot-misogynist

It’s a defense mechanism from narc inferiority/superiority complex and self-loathing but mostly a blind spot, e.g.

  1. He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
  2. He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
  3. He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
  4. On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a “gentleman” who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
  5. He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
  6. He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.

If that all sounds borderline to you, yes, a lot of misogynists are undiagnosed male borderlines.

3. is a psychopath, as is 5 and 6.

Huge hypocrites, project women as doing all of those. Implying men are impossible candidates.

Lower IQ, since misogyny is an indicator of inferiority. Defense in defense mechanism avoids this fact.

Falsely claim men are intelligent despite huge number of retards.

Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them.

Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.

Idiots. Defective brains.

The wounded masculine. Sadism. A woman who spots them (empath) and so, isn’t hurt, becomes a ‘bitch’. He was the one bitching, trying to wound her. Not wounding her wounds his ego, narcissism 101.

Real men don’t treat the weaker sex like crap, they have a duty. Women need men and men need women, emotionally.

Predator’s paradise

Locked in a room with victims who cannot escape.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/11/transgender-prisoner-who-sexually-assaulted-inmates-jailed-for-life

“White also had previous convictions for indecent assault, indecent exposure and gross indecency involving children, animal cruelty and dishonesty.

do we have police or what?

Prosecutor Chris Dunn described White as an “alleged transgender female” who has used her “transgender persona to put herself in contact with vulnerable persons” whom she could then abuse.

plotting legal defence

“The prosecution say that because there is smattering of evidence in this case that the defendants approach to transition has been less than committed,” he added.

Sentencing White to a minimum of eight years-and-a-half years in prison, the judge, Christopher Batty, said: “You are a predator and highly manipulative and in my view you are a danger. You represent a significant risk of serious harm to children, to women and to the general public.””

Should’ve been an asylum, like the other psychopaths.

Why not hanging? If someone’s a danger like that, why not?

Put sexual sadism in the DSM already.

Among the most violent of prisoners, including rapists, cross-dressing and fetishism represent a top hobby.

Really throws “muh gynocentrism” as a legal defense out of the window.

Servant or death?

Over half of living men would choose death.

This is why I find large gangs of men like a pack of Planet of the Apes style angry monkeys when SHTF …very funny.

Arrogance can kill you and if you don’t believe me, if you think you’re SpecialTM, like a pretty pretty snowflake, you prove my point.

Have you seen men in a bar? Five men can fight, constantly. They’d fight until they die if allowed. Imagine if the ER closed for a month and men were drinking up the last of all the alcohol in a cynical haze. Liver failure would be the #1 cause of death after fighting.

Men cannot cooperate, it isn’t in their nature. They either dominate or obey.
There is one King and thousands or millions of servants. You will not be the King. You do not have the ability or you’d have power in this time and place already. When it’s easy. Americans misunderstand monarchy, they were militia. Boudica was a warrior Queen, Elizabeth I and even Victoria. Women can do it (and Athena was the Goddess of Strategy in the largely patriarchal Greco-Roman system) but most men nowadays would be more useless than a small child by historic terms. Their instincts are wrong. They’re whiny, fat, hedonic, entitled and demanding. How many would try to barter and negotiate? You aren’t in a position to negotiate with real power. If someone can cut your head off, an attempt at manipulation is an insult to their intelligence. Sneaky little shits get the first bullet because nobody trusts them (and they’re right).

And since women would have higher value in a SHTF than men, why would each man be entitled (never happened in all human history) to even one woman? And you think she doesn’t have the choice, if leaving you only required walking away to a guy with bigger guns? If she can easily abort a rape baby by starving herself for a month? If she can poison your food? Men can be stupid when their hubris flares up like an unwanted erection. You won’t get what you want, baby won’t get his bottle.

The abilities you have now are pretty much what you’re stuck with. If women don’t want you now, why would they magically want you when you’re less secure, less healthy and they might die if they make one mistake? You think women would want pretty boy James Dean in a famine? Really? Where would he get the cigarettes for starters?

In a famine, people won’t want to breed and they won’t have the energy for sex. Do you think the horndogs will be kept around? Servants were often castrated for this reason, to become as useful as a woman. You flirt with the wrong woman and you’re dead. And you think someone crying on Twitter is harsh? Sorry, Princess, you’re fucked.

Obedience is something almost all men think they are too “good” for. Ahahahahahahahaha. It’s the bratty teen angst attitude that typifies modern America. If you are not comfortable with being the lowest ranking member of a group, subsistence living, over death, you will die.

If you wouldn’t want to live respectably on the bottom rung of a honour culture, you’re a genetic dead-end. A lot of people say they want a decent culture but then they catcall, mouth off to random men in the bar and other such fatal stupidities.

The truly Patriarchal society respects women and what a woman can bring to the table (what a man cannot, by default). If you’re expecting an orgy and consequence-free oppression, you don’t understand how sheltered your porn-induced fantasies are. Even savages afforded a level of human rights to their daughters and mothers and sisters because yes, that is some man’s daughter, mother or sister. Do you not comprehend how many Muslims running a “harem” slave ring with a user of one have a dead line now? Worse than if they’d had one family and raised it without bad blood. Bad blood is real and accursed. Tyrants are always overcome, always. Entire families wiped out because Grandpa was a jerk. What a “success”…

It’s disturbing how many sadistic tyrants there would be, if given the chance. We suffered them to live… for what kindness? They don’t intend to change, a leopard can’t change its spots. The real men will have to deal with them eventually.

e.g.

As a key sign of Inferiority (posted about before), they are misogynists.

Do you think all the women will let that guy live off their labours?

Really?

There was a guy bitching about “feminists” in the comments as if a woman wanting to earn the fruit of her labour (capitalism!) is bad… these guys won’t survive. Without female approval, men die.

great reply

“Are you telling me you believe women are beneath you? The reason feminism came to rise was because of the attitude you have toward the other half of civilization. Back talk? Who the hell are you tell an free individual they have NO right to have an opinion?”

If a woman is baking the bread and Little Red (Hen) says you can’t have any, you can’t have any. You can slap her, but she can poison your bread tomorrow. Who’s stupid and who’s dead?

The gender war propaganda weakens men, women rely on one another. Don’t swallow it.

Men are not entitled to female support. Female support comes from respect. Respect is earned and mutual. Common sense, I hope?

Look to history. Bachelors are mocked and derided as parasites (psychopaths). A man who can’t earn one woman’s respect, whose life’s labours are worth nothing because he has no heirs, is a monstrous failure. Bachelors die and nobody mourns. They’re bitter (and sadistic) so don’t weep for them, abusing a creature less likely to retaliate (kids, poor men, women, other animals) is a weakness, the glaring weakness of an inferior lifeform.

These moronic Americans (the video pastor is wise) think they could disrespect a Queen and live to tell the tale. It isn’t about sex, it’s about CLASS.

Class.

Class.

Class.

Class.

CLASS.

Not, ass.

You wouldn’t last five minutes in an ancient society. You’d look the wrong guy in the eye and be stabbed.

That was sarcasm. If you’re some useless runt only good at a desk job, don’t expect to transform into Rambo crossed with James Bond when you’re under more pressure, guy who complains about what’s in a vending machine like it’s the political issue of our time.

Men are deluded, not only do they believe in ridiculous fiction (above) but they’re always the immortal Hero.

If you’re a serf, you need to know that. You need to embrace it if your survival depends on that.

Power has never been all male, you idiots. What power would there be to the greatest man to ever live, if no woman would bear his heirs? Don’t think with your dick.

If you won’t respect power, male or female, you won’t be allowed to live.

How many of these “men” would:

A) take orders from the most powerful woman in a group

B) do this in a way that isn’t passive-aggressive or half-arsed

C) not try to fuck her?

2%? If you look how spoiled men are in this time, two percent is too generous.

You can’t be sure the other guy (or girl) doesn’t outmatch you, somehow, until it’s too late.
Imagine the world as a biker bar.. it already is. You’re insulated from this risk for now.

That is civilization. Civilization only lasts as long as the people agree to keep it.

Threats to the group end up dead. If you’re bitchy about hierarchy because you’re on the bottom, you’ll end up in the dirt.

I’ll leave you with one thought. Ancient history thought experiment. If women did all the childcare and there were no legal consequences for what happens to the children you own, and a psychopathic misogynist of a son were developing his traits in early childhood, do you not think he’d disappear? A son that would be ungrateful to the woman who nearly died to give him life and maybe bring down the entire family? The family shame? Do you let him grow stronger, to beat you? Leave you destitute as an old woman? Why keep that natal cancer around? Maybe it could be more subtle, encouraging reckless hobbies and self-destructive fight-picking and he unfortunately gets killed in a fight. Psychopaths are easy to talk into suicide as long as it looks like fun. But why didn’t problem sons who hated their mother (now we know a future sign of a serial killer) really exist… and child mortality was so high?

Why is there a sudden burst of these types now, even if you controlled for modern factors like dysgenic breeding habits? Why did so few live in harder times? The only ones we really know of were rich and hence, protected. Class factor, again. However, the decadent Roman emperors of the ancient world were still murdered (eventually) and don’t exist into this time. The obedient survived.

Logically, you could see feminism as a reaction to the over-breeding of inferior men in the modern era.

The more aggressive forms as a reaction to evil male survival rates, because the good men refuse to hang them (social JUSTICE) for various real crimes (usually against women and children, including oppression of their freedom and futures). It would be like the witch trials – if witches really exist. Rapists do exist and overwhelmingly most of them are male, Mr “Red-Pill”. If men were segregated from women, they’d attack other men and boys. That’s what predators do, they’re useful to nobody but themselves. They will not own SHTF.

Think about it. Why were the Muses and wisdom deities of warriors, female?
Christian prudence, why is it feminine as a virtue?

Children were considered the mother’s property, practically. A child who ignored their mother repeatedly was eaten by wolves or something, mauled by a bear, pressganged, something. Misogynists are maladaptive, there is a strong natural selection pressure upon them because they’re insanely addicted to the thrill of risking their life and a sexual selection pressure to rape because women don’t want them. (So men hate them too).

Breaking the rules isn’t a choice, that’s confirmation bias. They cannot follow the rules, they’re too weak.

Men who wouldn’t strike a mule because the kick might kill them. They’re dregs, periodically culled by war, disease, famine etc etc. Hence, a group of these antisocial idiots working together is funny. They want everything, they don’t share! What is it, a hippy commune?

“Please pass the last jar of Spam, Sir Kickass!”

Animals are not civilized. All they do is hunt, kill and die.

At best, as a teen they’d be kicked out to protect the sisters.. and society’s problem. Better?

Feminism was inevitable because of two things.

  1. women were expected to be working and taxed but had no say in where that money or labour went.
  2. good men stopped hanging bad men because bad women cried about it.

Where is the resolve to be just from men? Until then, women will try to provide it in support, until the real thing returns. A society of good women and no good men, dies. It dies slowly.

We don’t want gynocentrism but nature is fixated on the life-giver. In every species. Become a seahorse. It isn’t personal.
Genophilia is the good, parental investment theory is proven mathematically, civilization is the aim. If you can’t be good for good men and good women, there’s no place for you in that world.

Psychopath scripts and other scumbag spotting

A highly useful article

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/brainstorm/201712/5-things-psychopaths-and-narcissists-do-in-conversation

Trying to force intimacy is prior to discovering their missing parts.

Related.

When you only have a hammer…

you’re already semi-Communist.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/understanding-the-erotic-code/201712/the-dark-side-outing-men-s-sexual-misdeeds

The authors conclude that the ultimate destination sought by men is “porntopia,” that is, a place of “sheer lust and physical gratification, devoid of courtship, commitment, durable relationships, or mating effort.” On the other hand, they call women’s desired destination “romantopia,” a place of love stories where winning hearts, overcoming obstacles, and getting married reign supreme.

When you only study porn addicts….

Men invented courtly love, so that’s totally off.
There are few poetesses.

There are plenty of masculine female porn addicts (by testosterone).

It is not difficult to see how such information, coupled with the seemingly daily exposure of some men’s unwanted sexual aggression, can lead to the pathologizing of all men as shallow beasts with no control over their impulses. As a sex therapist, however, I have seen the depth of men’s suffering around trying to bridge the gap between their attachment language and their partner’s.

When you only speaking to the suffering….

And it isn’t pathologizing if they have a pathology.
NAMALT, he cries, to cover the obvious error in logic. Even if it’s 99%, that still isn’t good, is it? Never trust a sex therapist, they are some of the worst humans in existence and want to spread the misery.

 Instead, they are hoping that their partner can understand when they use language or actions in the bedroom that may objectify the partner, they are seeking erotic intimacy.

You see, there’s the stupid illogic of saying I didn’t want to kill them, your Honour, only stab them fifty times.
You bring that suffering on yourself.

Assuming women should accommodate men when the sexes are different is absurd.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201711/the-truth-about-sex-differences?collection=1107987

Men shouldn’t accommodate women either. You negotiate and meet halfway like adults

Objectification is demeaning. It’s demeaning to male models as much as female.
You shouldn’t be demeaning anyone you personally know,it’s a form of emotional abuse, however normalised by perverts. Porn is a fantasy of women you do not know. That is the attraction. The association of objectifying them is porn-learned behaviour.

Intimacy is emotional. It doesn’t require the physical. They need to work on their emotions by speaking to the woman, not griping to another man who will console them that they’re fine – because neither get it. You’re fine, just the way you are – spoken like a true SJW. You see, the more you suffer personally, the more they gain.

Consider the source.

You don’t go to a woman for information on erections, do you?

If a woman relinquished all forms of companionship and emotional support, a man would feel repelled, however ‘good’ the sex. That is essentially what these men are doing. Do not treat your woman like a porn star. You wouldn’t want other men to and she’s the one you’re meant to love best. You can try new things without insulting a woman’s dignity, which is the more common form of virtue when chastity is out the window.

You have half the bargain. You don’t do your half, she’s in the right to walk because you fail as a spouse. If you’re not spouses, you owe nothing. She owes you nothing, because you provide no security, which all women crave. This used to be common sense.

Think back to the 50s. Did men want to think of their wife like a stripper? Did they speak of, treat her in those terms? Let alone the hooker many men think they want. Thanks MTV!

Your downstairs brain will ruin your life.

A woman’s nurturing instinct is killed dead by a man who objectifies her body, because a woman’s most precious resources are inner beauty.

Happy husbands do not objectify their wives, this erodes love over time. This should rest my case but you can’t tell a blind man what he’s missing.

 The least helpful thing one can do is succumb wholly to one’s bias toward a feminine approach to relationship, forcing the man into greater feelings of self-loathing, shame, and suppression of his desires.

Sex therapist encourages fornication.

Is that not unhealthy for the men too?
I mean, impulse control in men is just so 19th Century, and we all know how poor the quality of those average men.

And bias? If it isn’t a choice, or an obligation, how is bias the correct term?

Without balancing both of men and women’s sexual and relational needs, there is a risk of creating even more distance between them.

The Sexual Revolution has only been good for us. We are never/always at war with dissatisfactionBad sex is the cardinal sin. You have too much/too little/bad quality and there’s always, ALWAYS something wrong with yougimme money. I can’t fix the problem though, that’s down to you, and whether you feel you need more development work Mafia style beat downs to your ego, courtesy of the people who know your body better than you and just care too damn much. They only want world peace! A fuck-a-thon orgy for peace!

How about a balance of life and death? Hunger and gluttony? Nude and prude?

A balance between good and evil is not physically possible, and that keeps ‘therapists’ rolling in bucks. Either it’s prosocial or antisocial. What is sleeping around? What is an objectifying (psychopathic) attitude to the pair bonding event of sex?

Ugh, r-vendors.

At least preachers are sincere.

Psychopaths objectify naturally, we’re all ants to them. Used/abused/crushed to amuse.

Those of us who have studied and trained in the concept of healthy sexuality—not just sexual pathology—realize the vast ranges of erotic expression in humans. We have barely begun to open to the idea that what has been acceptable culturally—heteronormative, monoganormative, and vanilla sex—does not begin to address who we really are.

“Vanilla sex” is actually healthy, normal, evolutionary sex. If you can’t appreciate normal sex, there is something medically wrong with you.

There’s the money, there’s the sale, there is what you’re really paying for.

Degenerates. Always preaching, always selling.

Go gay for Putin!

To think of all men as having pathological attitudes about sex is a sure way to shut down the emerging awareness of the myriad ways in which we can healthfully engage in this most basic expression of love and attachment, and differentiate it from the unhealthy ways we are seeing it played out in the media

He just said it isn’t about love and is 100% lust but ignore logic.
OMG it’s basic how can you argue with something so basic just go to a standard fuckparty and express yourself so basic, the only way to attach to another human being requires the Kama Sutra (btw quite a shit book).

Related, do gaslighters know what they’re doing?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/are-gaslighters-aware-what-they-dov

Duh. They know they get a thrill out of putting down good/kind/vulnerable people.
You wonder why there are less of them in the world?

The manipulations of gaslighters.

The Alt Right has been flooded with them, power-tripping on the quickly disappearing women and ‘beta virgins’ – no, they won’t read any evolution that makes them know how dumb they are.
“it’s okay to bully you, we’re on the same side” (in evidence, they only care about themselves, not even other white men)
“take a joke, you’re not allowed to be offended by banter” (British term, stop using it America)
“you’re too sensitive, stop caring about things” (not inc. their shit-tier opinions)
“what a loser” (by their highly subjective standards where they are #1 alpha dog in charge)

It would be sad if they weren’t so toxic. Gaslighters are a type of emotional vampire, this is why they threaten to leave – they feed on the drama of being begged to stay.

They leave when the host runs out of histrionics they can cause/manipulate (narcissistic supply) and they kill whatever movement they’re in (the cause of the manosphere implosion).

Men are dumb to gaslighters, failing to distinguish it from regular bullying or, in denser cases, bonding banter. When someone ostracizes you for existing, they’re not trying to bond?
It’s actually the Mean Girls unique form of bullying, deeply female. Isolation, esteem pummeling, all girls have experience with this. Bitchy traps like “you’re really pretty…. so you agree?” are tactically designed to plant a poisonous little seed of doubt or trigger some pain, the stupid men tend to skip ahead and insult a woman’s body parts e.g. her womb and/or fuckability, same as Mean Girls – pregnancy/whore slander and sluttiness/prude impossible fake standards. Think how low a man must be to verbally abuse a woman by her children, existent or not?

Others gaslight in order to feel some sense of control in their own lives by making others depend on them. Gaslighting can also be part of an authoritarian personality. A person with an authoritarian personality tends to think in absolutes: Things are 100 percent right or 100 percent wrong. When a gaslighter thinks that they are not the problem and everyone else is, this is called having an ego-syntonic personality.

It can be very difficult to get ego-syntonic gaslighters into treatment; they believe nothing is wrong with them.

That is called a lie.
In truth, they don’t care or see it as an advantage.
They’re the atheistkultists who lie about Darwin.

A gaslighting spouse or partner may either refuse to go to therapy, or if they do attend with you, they may tell the therapist that you are the problem.

If the therapist recommends that the gaslighter changes a behavior, the gaslighter will label the therapist as incompetent.

Even in therapy, a gaslighter may not truly be aware of, or may refuse to acknowledge that their behavior is the problem.

Worthless scum.

Even if a person is practicing gaslighting behavior without being consciously aware of it, they may get a “payoff” when their victim becomes more dependent on them. And then the cycle continues. The gaslighter also gets a “boost” when there are no checks and balances in place—no one holding them accountable for their behavior.

They claim not to be aware but they know it makes them feel strong?

K.

Someone fell for it. The sob story.

If a gaslighter is not aware of their manipulative behavior, that does not make it acceptable—it is still pathological, and it is still their responsibility. For gaslighters who have read up on this behavior or were taught it, of course, the same rule applies.

People tell them constantly. The definition of insanity? They’re just dense, they will never learn, so they’re commonly just a type of sociopath forever blaming their parents.

Negging is like gaslighting lite. They act like it’s nothing but select for the broken, like attracts like. Anyone with a spine is a ‘bitch’ or in the case of men, ‘an asshole.’ Lord Fauntleroy wants his way so the world must bow to Little Emperor…

The “gray rock” rejection of psychopaths and narcissists

https://lovefraud.com/the-gray-rock-method-of-dealing-with-psychopaths/

Even if we don’t take them back, the most dangerous time for a person is when they first break up with a psychopath. The psychopath feels rage at being discarded. Losing control or power over a person is not just a narcissistic injury for them; they feel profoundly empty when their partner leaves them even if they had intended to kill their partner. The reason is because they have lost control. Psychopaths need to feel in control at all times.

For all these situations, we have Gray Rock.

What it is:Ӭ

So, how do we escape this parasitical leech without triggering his vindictive rage? Gray Rock is primarily a way of encouraging a psychopath, a stalker or other emotionally unbalanced person, to lose interest in you. It differs from No Contact in that you don’t overtly try to avoid contact with these emotional vampires. Instead, you allow contact but only give boring, monotonous responses so that the parasite must go elsewhere for his supply of drama. When contact with you is consistently unsatisfying for the psychopath, his mind is re-trained to expect boredom rather than drama. Psychopaths are addicted to drama and they can’t stand to be bored. With time, he will find a new person to provide drama and he will find himself drawn to you less and less often. Eventually, they just slither away to greener pastures. Gray Rock is a way of training the psychopath to view you as an unsatisfying pursuit you bore him and he can’t stand boredom.

Video: James Fallon, psychopathy and the dead amygdala

Is this an old drum? Yes, it’s made of human skin. Deal with it.

We’re going into virgin ground, it’s going to be creepy. You’re used to it with me, with me, the questions get asked and nobody can say I’m braindead, at least. We’re trying, here.

Cut to 14 minutes in if you already know who this is.
Limbic system generally, deep cortex, and the amygdala structure referenced first.

This is intentional. From a lecturer, order matters.

Reader, pretending to care:


“It’s not something you can get used to”
louder for the naive psychopath worshipers at the back.
You cannot train it, it’s dead.
“It’s, it’s – The first part that develops, the cortex, in an infant”
“Before puberty: They’re full of emotion, or full of- morality.”

You might note similarities in the way he expresses himself, and the way I express myself.
Academese, mon amis.

He means there is only id and superego, devil and angel, “the orbital cortex is intimately connected to the amygdala…”
“In a psychopath, there is NO SENSE OF MORAL REASONING.”
So you can’t be moral and use psychopathic techniques.
It’s physically, biologically impossible.
You don’t get to claim to be a cool-headed psycho, but also a really nice, prosocial guy with a strong moral compass.
They have NO principles, that IS their principle.
Everything is totally, 100% selfish.
There are “impulsive” people with weak orbital cortex (DS: need training) that shut off “but they know what they’re doing is wrong.” Hedonists, this is very important. That is why they hide it, the personal and professional splinter, that dissociate compartmentalization. It also preserves the ego, as well as public persona.
In psychopaths, ‘morality’ doesn’t connect as something to countenance, it literally isn’t anywhere in their head.
They can predict other people probably care, but this is if you ask, if you plant the seed and make them think, referring to the hypotheticals of the interactions they’ve had with neurotypicals.
“A kid is really moral, oftentimes, hypermoral.”
I can see where he’s going but fear of punishment, a little different.
Naturally, he can’t see the difference.
Children have a strong sense (moral absolutism) because they are so weak and helpless. They see it clearly, good/evil and don’t rationalize excuses to be a shitty person like adults often do to ‘save face’, in part because no one would listen anyway. They’re not allowed excuses, only to obey the rules.
Where it’s “turned off” is epigenetic switching.
A psychopath has no instinct for what’s right. A latent psychopath still doesn’t, but they’re less inclined to act out, the
so-called successful sociopath. They can comply with the right authorities.

“Ethics is the rules of the game, psychopaths really know the rules of the game. They understand what you think and can therefore, play off it, but there’s no INNER sense of morality.

Empty, hollow, dead inside (that part of humanity).

Culture brainwashes you out of what natures instructs.

We know now Plato was correct, more than anybody, where you’re born with an innate sense of morality, you don’t have to tell a kid ‘don’t steal, don’t kill…’ they know it, we know now that you don’t have to be taught languages, you’re ready, your BRAIN is ready when you’re born.”

Fetal psychology?
Could this be the answer?
Could this be a form of birth defect when maladaptive to its Darwinian environment? In the extreme cases?

The same thing with beauty, there’s an innate sense of beauty so-“

I love how that’s the next thing he immediately latches onto.
I wanna see those studies, God-damn… imagine it…. but what would psychopathic art be? An instinct for corruption, decay and ugliness? It’s the deepest heart of emotion, so it must be the flipside.
Beauty must be limbic too, right? It’s gratifying to see my own thoughts align with other intelligent people.
“We accept instincts in animals but we’re not above that. No, we’re not. That’s innately there.”
The correct term is biological determinism.
The evolutionary stages of the fetus in the uterus is also BD.
SJWs are all about opposing any form of it, that’s insane. Completely disconnected from the biological realities, since all of biology, to be philosophical and technically accurate, all of biology is deterministic. It all grows in a precise pattern like chemical crystals, there’s a process and structure – you can’t have a diamond that isn’t related to graphite. Deterministic. Rare word outside of ivory towers, like reductionistic; related in practice. We can reduce a human to cells, human cells are deterministic of the human species, we grow from those stem cells.

See?
Back to instinct.
“Unless that area doesn’t develop, and it’s NOT THERE. It’s a kind of a blind spot. For morality, in psychopaths, it’s NOT There.”

Brain damage? I suppose most variations must be… depending on the rest of the structure, naturally.

“But the ethics they can learn and they use it against you.”
The antisocial rely on everyone else being prosocial. Predators rely on nice docile prey, even intraspecies predators, well, especially those.
In game theory, if you never punish, even the supposed Good players take advantage of you.
In a fake game where the stakes are ego.
Golden Rule involves reward AND punishment, at the same intensity. If your understanding of the Golden Rule isn’t 2+2=4, action and consequence, then you have understood it wrong.

I’m going to stop at the 20m mark, please read the book and watch the rest yourself, I wanted to show – since I haven’t for a while, that there is sound academic backing for some of the things I’m saying.

They sound off because I’m not lying – school was.

Dr Fallon has also done TED among other things, he gets around.
He shows it’s possible for someone with that brain to be a productive member of society.
Great guy.
You can find interesting write-ups.

RETURN TO FREUD.

YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO.

Come to the Dark Side, the cookies are choc-chip.

We have biological correlates now, you can’t resist us.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/scientist-related-killers-learns-psychopaths-brain/story?id=21029246
“Conscience and a sense of morality and impulse control lie in the limbic system and in the orbital cortex in the brain, according to Fallon.
“They connect and inhibit each other not unlike the super-ego controlling the id,” he said. “It’s the interface between the intellectual mind and the emotions attending to them.”
Fallon’s brain scans show low activity in both regions of the brain.
“No behavior is really evil or bad — it’s all contextual,” he said.

[what moral relativism was initially, Darwin]

“There is a time for sex and a time for killing, when someone attacks the family. But it’s done in context. The orbital cortex adjudicates the idea of morality and interacts with the amygdala’s drive to eat, drink and screw. There would be mayhem if it didn’t exist.” [which label do I cite? degeneracy, moral decay, dysgenics, dyscivics et cetera et cetera]
As a neuroscientist, Fallon said he always believed humans were ruled solely by their genes and not their environment in the nature versus nurture debate.
“I never took it seriously,” he said. “I was the poster boy for genes causing everything. But I had to eat crow and say I was wrong.” [he wasn’t though, it’s still natural and not manmade in CAUSE]
His personal story was the subject of a TED talk that went viral on YouTube in 2007 and he even had a guest role on the television show, “Criminal Minds.” Fallon was contacted by literary agents last year to write a book about his experience.
He blames abuse in the first three years of life, combined with biological features that turn off serotonin in the brain, leading to psychopathic violence.”

Loudspeaker: Epigenetics is still genetic.

The clue, is in, the name!
If political left-wingedness has a defective, atrophied, shrunken amygdala (lower volume, to put it clinically), that puts them closer on the Spectrum of Development to a psychopath, I find it funny he’s a moral relativist who stresses his own safety, moments after discussing revenge.
They think you don’t notice their slips. You’re not allowed to question their authority, think Cartman.
Serotonin, again, implicated, again…
I’m tired of being right. So, so tired…
Why are so many lefties needing to be on SSRIs? In good times, historically novel?
What happens when the meds aren’t made?

Here’s the emotional reaction of a neurotypical to violence, in colour.


Literal coldness in the psychopathic. Cold, hard reasoning. Calm in a crisis, calm enough to coolly kill you.
No emotion.

In the ABC article;
“I don’t have special emotional bonds with those who are close to me –– I treat everyone the same,” he said. “I am involved in a lot of charities and good works, and my intentions are good for the world. [he lives here] But I don’t have the sense of romance or love I am supposed to have for my wife. It’s not there.” [broken pair bonding, faulty attachment mechanisms]

I’d love to see Dr. Fallon and Anonymous Conservative interviewed by Stefan Molyneux.

A girl can dream.

I’m gonna throw out a theory here, while I’m here.

K-types have well-developed orbital cortex pathways.
In the future, there will be no leader, moral or otherwise, who doesn’t need to provide this proof of moral agency.
Otherwise, no one will trust them not to screw the ingroup.

Think of the scope of this information, it changes everything.
It needs to become public, it will eventually.

I wonder if there’s a hyper-K version with mild psychopathy (to protect one’s own) and strong conservatism in the amygdala?
Can we genetically engineer for this? Where can I sign that petition?