134 minutes in

It’ll take two generations before we know the full effects of the genetic engineering. Why are basically only white people doing this? Why this pattern of uptake? Well, have you seen the Military Power Index? Who’s stopping Russia/China? Us. I have covered this, at length. They’re already in one legal union, I think the SCO? See below.

Woman speaking from 134~ minutes is Alexandra Henrion-Caude.

“there’s no such thing as pure scientific consensus” starts about 1hr44 after that
“to hide this unknown, some scientists are on one narrative, some on another, we’re blind people trying to make light of what we don’t know” someone write a transcript!

“lethality now similar to flu” “do we proceed?” “this point is completely critical, revise the status of the pandemic”

“Portugal pointed out it was the wrong test, wrong to use as diagnosis, basis of number of decisions”

“forbidden, misunderstanding again, they are not vaccine as we have been using and developing them they’re different, based on strategy of wear masks which are not efficient”

“if masks, distance, and confinement are inefficient why go to ‘vaccine’ strategy?” “keep changing parameters”

“no one is using mortality parameters, it is not used as the consensus parameter”

“those ‘vaccines’ so-called vaccines, I prefer to say those genetically engineered experimental vaccines, exactly what they are, are dealing with our genetics” ~1hr52

“genome, heredity, not in old view that messenger RNA is very static” 1hr53

“based also on epigenetics, they have same DNA, same genetics yet you see morphology is different, in queen and worker bee, behaviour and organs not the same, epigenetics makes them look so different and behave so differently” Eloi and Morlocks. I wonder how r/k fits in.

“changes environment brings to your genomic information altogether,we are talking of DNA RNA and recently of circulating factors all influence epigenetics” 1hr54

“not only in your nucleus but also in your mitochondria so …we know 1% of protein coding sequences” 1h55

“all the rest is unknown, humans are composed 8-9% is viral sequences, we interact all the time and we put in our genome some sequences from the viruses, this so-called junk DNA, not the 1% tip of the iceberg”

“they didn’t plot according to complexity, just ratio of non-coding DNA to total DNA, you have complexity of living that goes… fantastic, should bring one conclusion, be really humble when we do anything with our genome” 1h56

“talking of the 1% this is much more complex than presented, like a cake in france, within the gene, greater number of RNA sequences embedded into gene actually very important in cell to bring flux of information” 1h57

“RNA we talk of all these information embedded in sequence, what do we know of RNA biology? Brings information how it works, possibility that will induce chromatin modifying, through interactions, RNA-RNA interaction, cascades of regulation with proteins and idea with predecessors for other small RNA” 1hr58-9

they are like brake to Ferrari, RNA, alter one of these cables of brake you think you’re safe because your Ferrari can still be used” 1hr59 Is it cruel to call dead men walking zombies or accurately mutants?

“like RNA function bring power of inhibition to system and can be viral or pure origins, if you cut one and try to brake, you don’t have full power, so number of consequences may not be seen immediately but may be seen in the long term” 1hr59 – Live 9h59 (entier) Post=Covid-19 Stockholm Peace Summit, uploaded Dec 2020. They knew.

because you have to face the situation where you really needed this information, the common assumption was simple DNA copied to RNA but actually you have more than that -2hr

your RNA can get edited, known since 1986 and other versions can be made onto this RNA distinction in 2014/6. – 2hr to 2hr1m

RNA is not something stable it can be edited in manners we still not know of, they exist but not know how they are turned on – 2hr1m

we are putting out a rushed experimental procedures, genetically engineered on worldwide scale, the worry, concern, through rushed development any serious adverse events, instead of being observed during 24 months normally, it has been cut down to six months, within six months they’ll be uploading the serious adverse events with a rushed experimental procedure – 2h1-2m so it’s due to come out… right about…. now? I want a white hat, dammit.

we see that it’s going in the wrong direction (screen: STRATEGIES NEVER USED IN HUMANS BEFORE) – 2hr2m

the path we are taking is a dangerous one -2hr2-3m

Strategies of vaccine summarised in this table have NEVER been used (read: tested for safety) in humans and most of the time never tested in [other] animals – 2hr3m or they hid the findings. Occam.

This is one serious concern again, not only they are rushed, but also they were never used and never fully tested in animals. 2h3m Was Warp Speed drawing attention to this?

You have different types of vaccines, (includes recombinant and nanoparticles) even plant cells, a wide variety of many parameters that are completely new. 2hr3m Read: novel. This will be an ethics case study on informed consent. Milgram made real. Get this woman on talk radio.

Given what Pascal presented, other doctor has presented, we have a number of treatments that exist, give good results and therefore, given this aspect and given fact we’ve had other epidemics and realised after the strategy of vaccinations was not the solution, we should learn from past experience. Strongly raise indication of public health policy of anti-Gov vaccine strategy. – to 2h6m

Meaning, I think the fact of developing a vaccine is a solution that should be undertaken with an indication – typically, it seems to be that severe cases are still an issue that we really haven’t well solved therefore focus on those severe cases, it has not been planned that way. – 2h6m

No indication was discussed to start with, no discussion as to why we should put up a worldwide strategy on ‘vaccination’ – had been irrational This is a discussion that has to occur. This is likely the reason why a number of people, more than half in France, don’t want to take the ‘vaccines’. I think because they didn’t have the debate. -to 2h7m I’d assume it’s same here, their uptake claim has stalled. Freedom to choose for your body is no debate subject.

They just don’t understand why everyone should go and get ‘vaccinated’, and indeed, we need to have the debate of stating understanding the education of the health policy of vaccination if there is such or more for certain category of people. -2h7m

2. Are the people currently getting the ‘vaccines’ informed they are currently being enrolled in a biomedical protocol? – to 2h8m This also implies they can be brought back for further experiments without their consent. The consent for an experiment is considered one-time, unethically, by many dodgy researchers.

This is a question I raised, reason being clinical trials are still ongoing, on the different strategies, ARE ongoing, YET people are being ‘vaccinated’, and to the best of my understanding, they are not informed they are NOT INFORMED they are being ENROLLED in a biomedical protocol. There is the strong ethical discussion to have here. – 2h8m Her emphasis. No means no. They’re trying to say people can’t refuse a second dose now, based on the admission to experiment point. Are the government public workers for the citizens or are you their slave? Who serves whom?

Another discussion, informing people about the specific risks with anti-coronavirus. This is very well explained on this article – at/to 2h9m

on the right published and stating, saying informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of RISK of covid-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease and what they are basically saying in this article is, we need given our past experience of anti-coronavirus vaccination, we need to SPECIFICALLY inform the patient (read: express consent, written) that the risks are that it will WORSEN the clinical disease – 2h9m wait is she saying variants could be caused by vaccines? Is that why UK has most variants? Is it mutating inside them?

How does it do that? In fact it is based on a phenomenon which is called antibody dependent enhancement. – to 2h10m

Yes you may have been producing antibodies, but those antibodies, instead of being, neutralising the disease, will actually have the REVERSE effect of facilitating the disease. Of facilitating the entry of the virus into your cell, of facilitating the replication sometimes of the viruses, this is a varied concern. – 2h10m I see what you did there.

Which explains WHY there has NEVER been any APPROVED vaccination on ANY coronavirus: on ANY Sars-1, MERs, and this is something that should be raised to THE PEOPLE. – 2h10-11m

The other issue we should be having is the targeted population are never defined in the clinical assays, this is a concern that made Dr (name) put up this article (on screen), associated editor of British Medical Journal” 2h11m Oh they definitely know/knew.

He asks the question Will Covid-19 vaccines save lives? which is the question one SHOULD be asking.
Here: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037

Tiled Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us

from it “Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to prove either (table 1). None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.” – BMJ, so it isn’t actually being studied at all, then why push it?

““That’s right,” concurred his guest, Paul Offit, a vaccinologist who sits on the FDA advisory committee that may ultimately recommend the vaccines for licence or emergency use authorisation.”

“But that’s not right. In all the ongoing phase III trials for which details have been released, laboratory confirmed infections even with only mild symptoms qualify as meeting the primary endpoint definition.9101112 In Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, for example, people with only a cough and positive laboratory test would bring those trials one event closer to their completion. (If AstraZeneca’s ongoing UK trial is designed similarly to its “paused” US trial for which the company has released details, a cough and fever with positive PCR test would suffice.)” – BMJ, PCR is being rigged by cycle N.

This is a very very big concern we should be having. – to 2hr12m, AHC again.

Not defined as proof positive, on which we would SPECIFICALLY ASSESS the vaccination, other aspect the gene modification, yes or no? I wonder what we are talking about, again this is a BIG misunderstanding, coming back to the root, we are talking of mRNA ‘vaccine’, those genetically engineered experimental ‘vaccines’, are designed for human to start producing a protein that they never produced before – to 2h13m

I’m not playing the fool but I’m just trying to understand, how can these people be saying that it is NOT modifying your genome when it is bringing in information to your body that your body didn’t have, your body was not an industrial producer of spike protein of this virus?” – 2h13m They’re lying.

That would make all of the consent misinformed. Pity you can’t sue. Get that over-turned.

This is an issue, now beside the fact you’re going to produce a protein that you never produced before, in the hope that maybe it will turn on an immunology response (isn’t that autoimmune?) apparently the efficiency response has to be synthesising to be strong but now – are these antibodies facilitating antibodies, or neutralising antibodies? Nobody knows.” – 2h14m BOOM. Does this tie-in to cytokine storm damage?

FACILITATING ANTIBODIES OR NEUTRALISING ANTIBODIES?

“and this comes back to that article about the specific risk of worsening disease with anti-coronavirus. The modification that mRNA may bring and I don’t see a way that it cannot have an impact on the epigenetics of your cell because as you saw in my introduction, the fantastic fluidity and changes that RNA brings to the cell, you cannot be in the expectation is not going to have an epigenetic influence on your cells. This is to me NOT reasonable and this goes COMPLETELY against ALL the fantastic improvement that we have made in our knowledge and ALL the literature that has been ongoing on SARs 2 and epigenetics and in the last month which is a HUGE piece of literature in the field.” to 2h15m.

So epigenetically, I don’t see how they CANNOT be actively changing your… have an impact, now in terms of changing your DNA? One can have the concern, that you may have reverse transcriptase and your mRNA may become er, DNA, and may, modify your genome, This has been foreseen as a possibility. And therefore, this has to be studied and unfortunately I didn’t see those genetic parameters, that genotoxicity, where, in the list of things that had to be studied”. – to 2h16m

So they can have another virus with reverse transcriptase or would an artificial shot of it at a later date do? Contaminated vials would be a useful thing for China to produce.

“There are other concerns but I don’t want to put them all this is to give you a glance as to the complexity that we have at the moment, DNA is being transcribed to RNA, RNA is being translated into protein, BUT you have the possibility of through other RNAs (DS: ‘boosters’?) you have the possibility of the DNA to replicate, there are, using ribozyme self-amplification proteins, with the prions (DS: wtf) of some self-reproduction, and this is ONE LEVEL of complexity.” – to 2h17m

“You have to envisage the fact that, this DNA will be modified and this is called your EPIGENOME.” – 2h17m

“These RNA are modified and these are your epitranscriptome (spelling?) proteins are being modified and this is called epiproteome (PTM) and all that can be transferred to the next generation.”

TO THE NEXT GENERATION.

“SO, to CONCLUDE, my question on the ‘vaccine’ is how can we be putting out vaccination policies when they were NOT made for the severe cases of covid-19, and were NOT made to prevent transmission human to human. Can we call them, vaccine? And is a genetically engineered vaccine, that is COMPLETELY EXPERIMENTAL can it be called again a vaccine? Or does the word experimental (unclear) vaccine? As well as the genetically engineered, because these completely new strategies that were never done in humans and can have a great number of consequences. Innovation is great, but not always a sign of progress.”

“Is it progress to change our consideration of human integrity? When we are using mRNA on HEALTHY individuals, this healthy aspect is really important, we consider humans as a biotech tool to be producing a viral protein. So we are ENGINEERED as to being the producer. This is touching our human integrity. This is a critical aspect that one has to really embrace in terms of the revolution that is coming along with this change of human integrity. (DS: reminds me of Iron Man 3 meets Revelations) We are NOT bacteria to be producing such and such proteins that we want to be producing, this is changing our genetic information and our HEREDITY information as well.” – to 2h20m

“So, once again, is that an innovation? To be changing our genetic information? I’m asking the question and is this a progress? It’s an innovation for sure, but is it a progress, to be changing healthy people, the genetics of healthy people. We are taking the risk of transmission with these ‘vaccines’, whether intergenerational level or transgenerational level, meaning that maybe the next generation will not have anything, but the following one YES – because, once again, we are touching on epigenetic issues.” to 2h21m

“And NOBODY can tell me, to date, that those ‘vaccines’, sorry, those mRNA those lipid particles that have the mRNA will not flow through your germ cells. Because when you go into the circulation, when you alter the vascularity of the muscle and the MOMENT you do so, some particles WILL go into your circulation and will circulate in a number of cells whether the brain, organs, whether the brain, whether the germ cells and no one can say that this cannot be taking place.” – to 2h22m

“So we are taking the risk of a modified transmission, in a manner that we know nothing of. And the last thing that may sound really ridiculous for the non-scientist but to me which is very important, We have been putting a lot of energy as to the hopes that we’re bringing RNA-based therapeutics I was even editor of a specific issue on therapeutics, with the hope of treating patients. What is going on at the moment is terrible for us, because this rushed strategy is in the faith that it may ruin all our knowledge (DS: whither is the control group?) and the promise of all RNA based therapeutics. (You’re forever GM humaning and you’re worried about money?) Because it will leave a very bad presentation because it is so rushed because experiments in animals were not proceeding in the right time, and therefore, we may face the situation that the public will never want to hear will never want to hear about RNA based therapeutics anymore, for people with severe diseases. What a waste.” – to 2h23m Currently 2.7k views.

If you sterilised one generation, the next might come up. If you get two, total genocide. Opening salvo in a war. Supposedly Boris’ dad wrote a book on eugenics and depopulation (see bottom), so did Sidney Webb. This might explain why he breeds with gay abandon. I wonder how many non-mutants (this feels like an uncool X-men plot) will be trafficked into breeding farms like Gattaca. If they get to mandate the kids to get it, they’ve got everyone. As many times and types as they want. Easily six per year, then adding on other dangerous ones like Anthrax the USG had to ban, they’ll claim for “international travel” which could mean anything. Not least because their reproductive organs are still developing (into the 20s, the under 25 cutoff is now important, see?) but because children are the ignored human rights case. Nobody cares about their civil liberties to say, home school themselves if bullied. If they can force all kids to get just one, that sets precedent. America called it implied consent (like blaming a rape victim for being white) and supposedly schools are doing drills where they lock the doors, stop the kids using their phones (Hello Auschwitz, no evidence in recordings or 911s) and stop parents from coming in. I’m sure antifertility vaccines have nothing to do with this. Remember, teachers are state agents. Like NHS doctors. They follow orders. Any orders. Like the Silents, they’ll be long dead before they see the rotten fruit of their work. Give it to the royal kids. Make sure it’s the real deal.

Supposedly teachers might be training in assessment of Gillick competence to coerce kids into ‘agreement’. If kids can consent medically, the pedos have open season. Lolita is a pedo rationalisation, ‘she was asking for it’.

I don’t care who rips this one off, SHARE SHARE SHARE the information.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Russian_relations_since_1991

The official working languages of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation are Chinese and Russian.[citation needed]

Also, they invite the UN and Iran is a member. MFW:

I calculated the SCO numbers some time ago. They could easily win a war. EASILY.

Now you see why Iran is mission-critical.
They (China, their investment money) target UK for not-vaxx as revenge for the Opium Wars, which wasn’t us. It was Them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation#/media/File:SCO_2017.svg

Consider the timing. Future proves past. NATO is red herring, SCO want war.

I think China might have a spike solution, but only for the women, if you know what I mean. They have a lot of excess men to go around. Gang rape style, if necessary. Look at the cultural ripples to see the Sun Tzu at work.

….Why is wu-flu oestrogen-protected?

[this bit can be skipped by the weaklings and mental midgets who love Big Brotherhood]

Meanwhile, the pick-up artists are already normalising the cultural dehumanisation and criminal rape of white women, in addition to the usual incitements and excuses (no means maybe, keep pushing, LMR, she’s lying about being a virgin) which actually toe into hate crime territory easily (on grounds of religion if not sex). I’m sure this will end well. Just be like Roosh and ‘diddle‘ her in her sleep. If they can’t drug her (including alcohol, the most common rape drug) then they wait until she falls asleep. …That isn’t sex. Sex requires consent. I’m sure it’s a coincidence most PUAs are “Asian” and feel entitled to whites’ women. Whether we run away on New Years Eve in Cologne or not. (Porn) treats women like toys, now the low IQ males do. Violent attitudes don’t get more domineering than raping someone unconscious, when they’re utterly helpless to resist. Putting the burden on getting women to stop them was clearly bullshit. We lack the upper body strength and ability to drop the politeness anyway. If anything, rapists enjoy resistance as a ‘game’. Read about Weinstein. Courtship disorder? Sexual sadism? Why not both? Oddly, Youtube has yet to ban a single channel for inciting rape against white women (rhetoric blame-shift: they deserve it, they’re probably a slut because they wear skirts – objectification is dehumanisation). White women aren’t the trafficked zombie characters of porn, being raped for show (brainwashed MKULTRA style by The Game, as slavery charities note) or living toys with no heart, they’re people and your genetic future, who should be protected from invaders in any patriarchy. PUA’s use of patriarchy and perverting it is the male, Satanic version of SJW’s subversion of female groups who like knitting and baking bread. The rot gets in early. A rutting animal fucks, anyone can do that, it’s bestial. Hollywood tells men it’s their rite of passage to be masculine, to be a manwhore. But lovemaking was always the boast, with a woman who loves and respects you. Only the Boomer normalised porn from its trafficking bedrock, with publications like Playboy. They’re not watching sex, they’re watching rape. Where do you think these women come from? How do you explain the suicides? No sane woman would choose to be violated repeatedly, that is not work. Invisible slaves. Rape slaves, because it’s not sex. Sex is a positive claim, legally consent must be proven (as PUAs know, you can’t prove a negative), hence the Left trying to normalise raping a minor as ‘sex with a child’. Yet nobody points it out. It seems the tradlarpers don’t care, so I hope China castrates them, chemically or literally. If you would harm your own women, who rely on you, you deserve it. If the men want to violate us, they can’t complain when the Chinaman and the Muslim think it’s okay. Because you set the standard in your own in-group and the incitement you not only permitted, but celebrated. Worse than Boomers. Being a rake, a cad, a wastrel, was sad. Same with wankers and porn. Now they’re trying to make slut shaming men wrong with the ridiculous Chad meme. Women don’t want Chad. Especially traditional women. With the sexual disgust studies, it’s proof women want a used-up slut even less than men. MGTOW isn’t the man’s choice, it’s sexual selection. Women would rather be alone. FGTOW? In the case of religious virgins, nobody waits for a slut. What’s the point? Who wants a fizzy drink that’s gone flat? They want their own kind but PUAs feel entitled to trade-up and it will never happen, (firstly that many women don’t exist and two don’t want them) and they’re slowly realising that fact and trying to rationalise it. Adam was directly warned by God so his eating the fruit was worse. They can’t have been wrong this entire time and fallen for a scam, it must be half the species. Sexual selection must be wrong, they falsely reason. The memes are Chinese, people. The women freaking as Koreaboos, the female weebs, describe gentleman qualities, the antiChad. Chad is a psyop, you morons. He’s forever alone but with better clothes. It’s a death cult of sterility. Atomic, suicidal, nihilistic and empty. High time preference loser. Look at the life outcomes of bachelors, shorter lifespan to boot. Women don’t want James Bond, they want Mr Darcy. Even the female sluts! Ask them! I did. A sterile male slut is not alpha. Alpha is a breeding pair. They’re laughing at you. It’s like the smug mudshark or ricecooker talking about white demographics, sneering. A happy family man is the only alpha possible. You find the best woman in the in-group and keep her happy, that’s it. Not rocket science. You don’t need to buy anything. But they can’t do that, can they? Mummy issues too strong. Being nice to your own wife or daughter is simping now. But they claim to desire a high trust society, sure Jan. They wouldn’t last a week in the 1950s without being arrested for harassment, rape or being a general creep. All they have is lies, sexual Pied Pipers flogging shitty books that tell you to stalk women home, lie to get in their home (for the toilet) and rape them. They look up to that, psychopaths are compulsive liars who move the goalposts on what’s a crime, hence ignorance of the law is no excuse. Criminals always lie. Removing books whose entire purpose is incitement to rape white women from Amazon is a good idea, like a non-fiction how-to manual book titled How to Murder and Cover Up Forensically. That isn’t censorship, it’s human decency. They were about to get sued for aiding and abetting crime including international breaches of human rights. What’s next, Amazon must sell burglary tools? How to Eat Babies by Hillary Clinton? It isn’t ‘just joking’. Pedos use this type of material. They swap grooming tips. How to castrate your son by the NHS, with handy graphic guides? The problem is the people buying that shit, they have no empathy. Corruption is a serious problem, where is your conscience? They’re getting young men too early in development online to grow patriotic or a conscience when it comes to female violence. Instead they have attachment disorders and serial monogamy, stunning and brave. I find it especially funny they take marriage advice from divorced men. Take weight loss advice from fatties too. The emotionally broken leading the sexually stunted. They can’t maintain a relationship to save their life! They literally think they’re fucking for virginity, the retards. They dare call their principles trad when in another, traditional era, they’d be lynched for defiling the magistrate’s daughter. They’re being left on the shelf by increasing numbers of alienated women who are so disgusted by them (and the race mixing, look at white women stats) they just give up – leaving them ripe for the Asians, by force. I honestly think whites might be doomed already. The men abandoned us culturally. It’s over. White people kinda deserve to die out if the men hate their own women. The porn succeeded,

Hollywood lied. You’re becoming the new Boomer. Porn and game (emotional abuse*) are the bread and circuses to prevent patriotism (pick-up is multicultural and degenerate) and family formation and a happy sex life. The more men sleep around, the less they score in sexual satisfaction. The same pair bonding issue happens to them neurologically. They’re spoiling themselves and like SJWs corrupting the younger generations coming up after from spite. Then there’s divorce risk. Look at the male data. Look at the Boomer. That’s your future. The manchild never grows up. Everyone hates that guy and they don’t realise nobody thinks they’re cool, the social isolation is a punishment. Prime meat for gold diggers though, easy to con. They’re conned by men all the time. Just one more e-book! They play themselves.
Ironically, every handsome man I’ve known was monogamous and especially hated r-types. Real patriarch quality. Game is the r-select cope for marital failure. It gives them an excuse for deadbeating, failed relationships and divorce. Sex and the City for men. They didn’t fail as men of the house, they wanted to fail!

*gaslighting, lovebombing, stonewalling, ghosting, hoovering etc. Clinical abuse. They’re emotional vampires. This is why seduction is/was a crime, with breach of promise. It ruins societies. It’s anti-social. Black men like white women because we’re so gullible and trusting, apparently. Easy to abuse. They EXPLOIT that. It goes unmentioned. Roosh bragged about raping an unconscious woman, PUA sites should be banned as incitement. Legally, it is.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/jun/15/the-sexual-assault-of-sleeping-women-the-hidden-horrifying-crisis-in-britains-bedrooms

The useless fuckers/wankers are literally impotent. They can’t get it up. But porn and sleeping around can’t be the problem, oh no! It can’t be that psychologically you feel deep buried shame at lowering yourself like an alley cat.

“There seems to be a perception that something like this is a ‘lesser crime’ because it might not be at the hands of a stranger but your partner. But what would feel worse? Being pickpocketed by a stranger or robbed by someone you love and trust?” she asks. “The idea that you’re asleep so it didn’t require violence is also very dangerous. Penetrating someone’s body without their permission is an inherently violent act.”

These guys could always volunteer to be ‘banged’ (note the violent terminology) by the super-friendly local rape gang in their sleep, to see what it’s like for women? …No? They think it’s the women’s fault because PUAs told them the woman’s job was to ‘fight them off‘, rather than being a MAN and having some IMPULSE CONTROL. That’s pedo logic. That’s Weinstein logic. That’s pure rapist rationalisation, telling themselves they’re not evil. Reprobate mind. If you didn’t want to be robbed, you shouldn’t be so rich? Harrison Bergeron’s world. …If you didn’t want to be raped, you shouldn’t need to sleep?… If you didn’t want to be raped, you shouldn’t be so white? What’s next, female pedos and Muslims in swimming pools can rape boys because of the shorts showing leg too? That’s how insane they are. It’s deranged. ‘Sexual emergency’ crazy. The myth of blue balls again when they have two hands. Self-control separates us from most other animals. They’re subhuman by action. Note the psychosis of the victim blaming. They chimp out and muh dick and blame anyone but themselves. If a dog understands No so can you. Use your words, always ask. It isn’t hard. Especially if you’re a degenerate with potency issues. Thank you, God for sparing women those would-be rapists. Then again, circumcision might be the cause, they need a lot of Viagra to wake it up too. Women hate the mutilated.
Any woman in that situation, which pedos do to kids as well, FILM IT. It’s funny PUAs tend to film themselves committing crimes when that’s evidence against them. They do look up to psychopaths, who are dumb. Filming sex without consent is a crime but not in the case of no sex. If you didn’t consent to sex, there’s no crime in filming yourself sleeping. If they rape you, you won’t get in trouble for having filmed that, especially as court evidence. Kids need to be told this. It prevents pedos getting away with it and adult rapists too. So that’s where our culture stands, in tatters. We need a porn use x sexual violence study we’ll never get thanks to ((censorship)). Study pedos in prison too, I’m sure that’s interesting.

[end of weaklings skip]

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/feb/17/eugenics-skeleton-rattles-loudest-closet-left

THE LEFT KNOW.

“Such talk repels us now, but in the prewar era it was the common sense of the age. Most alarming, many of its leading advocates were found among the luminaries of the Fabian and socialist left, men and women revered to this day. Thus George Bernard Shaw could insist that “the only fundamental and possible socialism is the socialisation of the selective breeding of man”, even suggesting, in a phrase that chills the blood, that defectives be dealt with by means of a “lethal chamber”.”

Oh, look, the enemies of Man. Fancy seeing them here.

“Except this was no accident. The Fabians, (((Sidney))) and Beatrice Webb and their ilk were not attracted to eugenics because they briefly forgot their leftwing principles. The harder truth is that they were drawn to eugenics for what were then good, leftwing reasons.”

This is why Left means evil in Latin.

top comment is funny

“This is a disgraceful article it’s like arguing that Tony Blair and Hitler were socialist.”

Literally though? Those ‘social programmes’ need big taxes, big gov. They’re so close to breaking the programming, aren’t they? Boomers were told so long they had fought the Nazis they didn’t see themselves becoming them.

They’ve been warning us for yonks.

https://fullfact.org/online/stanley-johnson-the-virus-book/

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/may/11/stanley-johnson-lands-book-deal-to-republish-virus-thriller-the-virus-coronavirus

The Torah party know too. The thing they have in common is a love of masonry. Ban the cults!

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/15/covid-jabs-to-become-mandatory-for-care-home-staff-in-england

SUE. Let them fire you and SUE. Quote Nuremberg law and discuss Aktion T4, this shit is experimental. VAERS has mortality data.

And where the F is Trump already?

“The controversial measure sets up a likely battle with staff in both services and could see the government sued under European human rights law or equalities legislation for breaching the freedom of people who work in caring roles to decide what they put into their bodies.”

Bio-rape.

At least they’re only asleep mentally.

Are you FREE or a SLAVE?

Social Services has sterilised people in this country and called it legal. Good luck. There was one case where they tried to famously steal a normal tourist Italian woman’s baby by forcing her to undergo a C-section while here. They are insane.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/dec/03/italian-woman-forced-caesarean-wants-baby-back-essex-county-council

Kids as sexual objects:

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/jun/15/ofsted-chief-warns-against-victim-blaming-in-modesty-shorts-row

If kids can consent to the genetic engineering trials, they can consent to be raped in their sleep too. IF.

Courses are the new model, huh?

You know Skillshare doesn’t actually have real courses, right? It’s Youtube for hipsters too pigshit to look up the video/s on Youtube that the ‘experts’ of SS ripped off. Test my theory with their specific topic names.

  1. I question why she’d hide her own man, even random limbs aren’t in photos.
  2. Why not married? Isn’t that endgame? If you can’t do it, it’s like asking a porn addict for sex advice.
  3. Why no kids, then, if she wants them so? You could pay a surrogate, surely. With medical advances, your body is no excuse. Unless the broad jaw indicates something else… which would explain the efforts to seem feminine. Personally, I can seem feminine in combat boots so I never got that. You’re feminine just by being a woman, surely? Anything else is deeply insulting.
  4. Why does it appeal to Americans almost exclusively? Especially the ghetto rat variety? Seems predatory, to me. The ghetto doesn’t want its own, why would the rest of the world? Most of her customers seem that way, but even Africa doesn’t want the self-proclaimed “African” Americans back. They got rid of them for a reason, like Europe ejected the Puritans for being mental. I think it’s unfair to tar Africans with the herpetic brush of low America.
  5. Why does it act like jetsetters are all the same homogeneous blob with no national flavours or exclusive characteristics, leading to the now-cliche black girl moving to France (or lately, Italy) epidemic? 5b. Why does nobody point out that is literally colonialism? They don’t want you there. You are a parasite. You are not entitled to be there. Cultures don’t exist to amuse you with tiny tourist food. Why should Europe take in foreign strays? Go home. Look what Europe has done to invaders in the past. That could be you. Read the political room. White people are not nice. The French don’t even like the Spanish. The French raped more black women than any other white country. How stupid are you? The Italians/Romans invaded Africa too. England was the nice guy who ended it all. Hollywood lies.
  6. Appeal to tradition while pushing political correctness e.g. race doesn’t exist/ means nothing / but one must be inclusive… of what? Impossible paradox.
  7. She gets things wrong. Much like Bernadette, anyone correcting, however gently, is swiftly blocked and possibly reported with the hand-waving excuse of negativity (actually toxic positivity, narcissism and gaslighting).
  8. Seems to act like rich men are desperate. No hunty.
  9. ” ” ” ” and eager to wed. “Not our class, dear” a foreigner or outsider would never be approved. Men of any breeding need family permission. If he wants you, he isn’t what you want.
  10. You will still need a job. A man will not pay you to exist, outside of a brothel.
    10b. Influencer is not a job. I’ve had many online identities, for years, it isn’t hard.
  11. Birkins are shit, have you tried getting into them? Too fussy. How you think people of a certain rank dress is very different than the ‘I wear what I like, who are you to judge me?’ attitude they display. Poor people and rich people dress the same, basically, because neither gives a shit what you think. Specifically you, their moral inferiors. England especially is sick of social climbers infesting London, be they blood Russian money or American royal family worshippers. They’re not even English, they’re German. By all means, take them! Most of us secretly want to go back to the latest English blood anyway.
  12. Tax evaders are not rich. “Bey” keeps implying they’re smart. It’s like calling a lottery winner a mathematician. There will be global taxes shortly, you fucking numpties. It’s called globalisation. Like any Commie is gonna look at the table and think “I’ll just leave that big pile of cash there, for no reason!” Please.
  13. Courses must be valuable to be called such, otherwise it’s fraud. ‘Member Trump University?
    13b. I think she failed to write a book because she couldn’t control it. It’s easier to spot a farce written down than with all the window dressing of flamboyant presentation and fugly girl acceptance. In a book, the information itself could be parsed for accuracy… and quantity.
    13c. Look up the signs of a cult. Yes, cults of personality count. Why do you think I hide? I find the idea weird. Who wants that? Trying to replace family or isolate you from family is the creepiest indicator. Usually it’s the same rhetoric – you’re leaving them behind, they’re toxic, they don’t understand, you don’t need their negativity, follow your dreams by giving me money. The PUA lot do the same thing sometimes, this is the other side of it: how to get da rich manzzz. Also blaming you when THEIR information fails the test of reality.
    13d. false scarcity. Why aren’t these courses up all the time? Just hire somebody to run them, you’re not busy or important.
    13e. lovebombing is verbal abuse e.g. my dear elegant ladies, now provokes my gag reflex.
    13f. the cult copes e.g. you can’t criticise our Glorious Leader, you’re just JEALOUS! e.g. the ‘only commenting’ to tell you how sad they are (projections of a hapless follower) etc.
  14. Yacht girls are not classy. Some look it e.g. Grace Kelly, but they’re still just sluts.
  15. If a man is paying you to ‘party’ with him, that is not a girlfriend. Girlfriends don’t get paid. It’s a hippy invention anyway. Arguably, no such term exists, a girlfriend is just a girl too dumb to realise she’s the mistress (whether or not he’s married). You were fuckzoned, deal with it. Girlfriend is the consolation prize for losing the audition for wife. Trust no man who says otherwise.
  16. Have you heard the expression ‘stringing along’?
  17. Never mentions the social, genetic, psychological or financial implications of race-mixing. Those channels never get taken down (like the MRA Black Pigeon types bitching about Asia). Any man of wealth who marries so far down as to cause outbreeding mutations would be disinherited, so what is your point?
  18. There are good girls and good time girls and we all know the type who want the easy way out (usually an orifice). Male gold diggers exist but…. come on. There are wife material and bondage material. You can’t hypnotize a man’s dick into marrying you, that has never happened. It’s a Mills & Boon trope. Fuckboys encourage it. It makes them enjoy it more, fucking a fucker.
  19. Your appearance will determine 90% of your results. You can spritz perfume onto pig shit but it doesn’t matter.
  20. Your marriage will be miserable and his lawyers will rape you (or hitmen kill you) if you tried to leave. I’ve met people like that. You cannot ‘play’ them, it isn’t a game. The only bag you’ll secure is a body bag. Then again, men marry trash and don’t expect a stink, so the change of heart could be on his end. Opening your legs does not require a credential. You could be replaced by a 14yo brothel slave in Brazil.

PS If anyone wants to rip off these points for a video, be my guest. No credit needed, it’s common sense.

I am almost tempted to buy it and post the whole thing online. I cba but someone else do this.

The Sexual MLM

The MLM aspect is trading on CENTURY-OLD hypnosis adverts.

H Y P N O S I S

no shit

accurate comment: “Guys like these are the reason so many women are single. It’s a bad circle: women avoid men because they act like this, and then guys say women don’t like nice men and act even more like douches because women avoiding men is all the women’s fault -_-“

Well, scientifically women are happier being single than men (as surveys of married women showed, when hubby wasn’t around to sway them) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-happy-children-spouse-partner-relationship-unmarried-a8931816.html

The manosphere is not redpill because they ignore this fact and other data e.g. female lifespan when married drops, male increases. How is anybody faking their life expectancy, paranoid pansies?

What’s the difference between running around after one woman who loves you and bore your heirs versus running around more after lots of women who don’t actually respect you? They’re still wasting their lives on women, that’s sad. Crushes are not respect. They are reviled. Women don’t think like men. Respect is rare, women don’t respect 99.9% of men they ever met, not truly. Where’s the study? Someone tell Woodley. I’ve respected two men I’ve known IRL the entire time I’ve been alive. Women don’t respect money, women respect morally. The concept of honour needs study.

There are too many super-mum duties and pressures to make it worthwhile nowadays, modern marriage isn’t worth it for women, he’ll still cheat with porn. Why bother? women question, I hear them of all political stripe. We can’t work two full-time jobs (the money job and mothering) plus house cleaner plus chef plus the energy for depraved sexuality. What does the man even do anymore in postmodern marriages except sperm donor? No protection, no patriotism, no religion (conversions don’t count after the party is over), no breadwinning exclusively, so what? Why? What is the gender role of men getting married now, their duty, since they expect the woman to be wife, mother and breadwinning husband, therapist and his Mommy like he can’t do his own laundry after all that. I’m not American so I can see it a mile off. That’s why your birth rate will continue to plummet.

The lower IQ men who buy sexual MLM material are generally too stupid to get the message of collective female retreat: man-up. Gentleman. Marriage advice from bachelors is like exercise routines from the obese. Imagine if this guy married and had a daughter, what kind of father would he be? This is how women think and FGTOW is older than MGTOW. Why should a woman (any woman*) shorten her lifespan by marrying him? In the age of no-fault divorce because of Ashley Madison adultery? Men are not equal so not equally viable as husband, rejects always existed pre-internet, women just joined the convent. Men want the genetic legacy, women don’t care if they take care of their children or other family. That’s why patriarchy forced them culturally to marry. SJWs and CHINO types both baby other women’s kids in schools and church groups. Wake up. They get all the dopamine with NONE of the maternal mortality.

*Sexual selection belongs to women, the sexual MLM is a ponzi that promises to reverse literal evolutionary forces in the species. Women would rather have no kids than those of PUA types. Get it through your skull. Otherwise lonely Boomer men committing suicide is their destiny.

Psychopaths are also narcissists and online their MO is known to include a ‘harem garage’ so that psycho isn’t even original. He’s ripping off clinical narcissism discussions directly.

comment “That metaphor is so creepy and terrible because it’s a term used in human trafficking. He knew what he was doing, and he’s pretending it’s “just a metaphor””

It’s dehumanization.

comment “As a horse trainer I was appalled by that mare/stable “metaphor” 🤮🤮 this guy is so gross. Like can we stop using animals to make sexual analogues please it’s disgusting Also mares are the ones who run the herd so if his analogy of coming in and out of the stable was real it would be wrong. The mares (specifically the lead mare) they would be the ones deciding who comes in and out. 💀💀 the “stallion” would not decide if the “thoroughbred” stays or not.” LOL

It’s sexual AA for non-whites (most PUAs, if you look into it) combined with an MLM – take this course to sell this course… but English majors becoming English teachers are a Ponzi? Really? Do you really need a programme telling you how to be a gaslighting r-selected creep? It’s like teaching fish how to swim. The course Ponzi is the new one after e-books failed to account for Americans refusing to fucking read (try the Bible, y’all need Jesus) so figured they’d pay for Youtube videos like a sexual version of skillshare’s hipster welfare ponzi full of people you’d never heard of with results saying ‘trust me’ ’cause they’re not married but they COULD BE. If they WANTED, get off my back MOM I don’t wanna give you GRANDKIDS you’re oppressing ME. Breeding is for SISSIES. Girls have COOTIES, my bros on the forums UNDERSTAND ME. This is not a cult of anti-natal creeps, this is WHO I AM. They call me ALPHA. They never lie, they’re all millionaires banging babes daily they just also post on forums constantly. They’re bitter because they’re TOO successful with women. I can’t find a good wife and it’s NOT my fault. It’s society. I have transcended EGO, obviously.

Calhoun’s mutant rats didn’t breed and neither shall we. We’re independent thinkers with no kids who believe in Patriarchy like a rich guy wants a wealth tax.

Then there’s the ‘satire’ argument of endorsing national rape of white women… as if Rotherham rapes in private weren’t bad enough, you now have to ban freedom of association for the literal majority of white people according to totally not rapey non-white males.

They all have ‘player burnout’ being alpha widows to that one hot chick they scored from pity or drugging and refuse to admit their pair bonding is ruined by porn addiction and promiscuity frying their dopamine circuits because it applies to sluts but only women can be, right? #cope Not like dopamine circuits all work the same in the whole species, is it?

The funniest is the naturalistic fallacy that sterile sex equates to something evolutionary, nope.

It’s overt a con as ‘retire early by paying me’ by that guy who married a fug Asian despite the higher divorce rate (I got suspended for pointing this out, literal divorce rates only). The MSM endorsement is coincidence.

Corruption was illegal in ancient white society for a reason. Psychopaths are glib and try to normalise their parasitism (Marxism) and clinical, pathological degeneracy. Not to mention, all the coercion and rape law, which they deny even though I checked CPS guidelines and the rape law in America before forming that legally accurate opinion. Incitement to rape more white women is the last thing we need.. it enables new citizens to crime. They’re not going to go after black women statistically, are they?

Psychopaths have average IQs. Sexual criminals have the lower end of that scale. There is no freedom to incite violence against a free Western citizen and rape is right up there. Concepts like ‘building kino’ (assault, grabbing women randomly like we don’t already have laws….) and LMR – when she says no but you ‘bang’ (note violent term re white women only) anyway (das called rape, son).

When America was great, the seduction law on legal books still was enforced by Patriarchy.

Pretending this material is aimed at white men is a psyop.

They always show young solid 5 white men prior to middle age (mid-30s) for their point, what happens to the old men put out to pasture, age 40, 50, 60, 70, 80?

This is not about ‘dating’. It’s incitement of white rape.

Alcohol is the most common date rape drug, statistically. See, they’re showing they can get away with it. That’s incitement. Do we take them seriously (true stories) or not (satire, joking, metaphor)? Also, unconscious and weak people cannot consent. That’s how men and minors get raped too.

Video: Contrepreneur Formula

NLP doesn’t actually work, though. People notice the emphasis, especially Brits since most of our humour is based on it, plus repetition is viewed as an insult. If it works on anyone, that’d be certain, greedy Americans.

Think about it. If NLP worked, you could rob a bank with it. If the military were using it, maybe, but they’d be using it in combination with torture and trauma formation – and THAT’s the thing that works.

It’s literally selling morons on magic words aka SPELLS.

Those “magic books” about “personal magnetism” have been around for a century, you can find them archived. I have read them as a teen for kicks. There are even shitty “hypnosis” ones clearly aimed at getting some random Victorian dude laid. Most self-help just rips it off… and badly.

Hell, they sold them on “Law”* of Attraction aka the Wishing Well or Be Your Own Genie.

We wuz all fairy godmothers….  no homo…

It reminds me of PUAs who slag off teachers for only producing more teachers… when they’re selling “courses” on how to …eventually sell PUA courses. At least the teacher’s subjects actually exist.

Contrary to what he says, low IQ does fall for emotional appeals because they can’t be bothered to research the speaker (before or after the talk) and the con artists are dangerous because they socialise and blend with real business people, I’ve seen them round London at top hotels, like lampreys on the genuine successes. Go grey rock on them, this is why celebrities of all kinds MUST seem aloof too. The narcissists think they deserve to spend time with only “special” people, it’s the entitlement and use Scientology type cult tactics like “raise your hand” – an obedience tactic learned at school. It could be legitimate, with a gifted teacher, but their use is telling.

These people literally block the exits – that’s illegal?

*Whose law? God’s? What makes it a law? What’s the equation? How do other forces interact? Pseudo-intellectual crap. You have low IQ sociopaths targeting the other low IQ, so usually men on men. Both are quite vapid and certainly greedy but there’s no real airhead stereotype in culture for men so they never question themselves – or they’re portrayed as oddly quirky, lovable and successful (Dumb & Dumber).

PUA scam video

This is full of cringe.

From Dalrock’s comments

I’ve linked this video before, but for anyone still deluded about the wonders of pickup artists, they are a SCAM. Feel free to say women want easy sex and they’re just as sinful as men- fine. But PUAs lie all the time. This video is just one good example of that.

Ah, but what do most have in common? From a woman’s perspective?

Peterson supports shekels

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2018/06/02/peterson-cant-handle-the-truth/

You think he doesn’t know?

They pay him through the nose in private to tell them what they wanna hear.

He said the “best way to deceive someone is a (tiny) slice of the truth” (intellectually dishonest).

I’m starting to think I should autoplay Disney’s Let it Go on this blog.

This is apropos to 90% of my content, it’s commentary on the inevitable.

Bachelors are the most reliable source of income, think about it!

Link: Single male doing family politics

It sounds weird typing it like that.

Trigger warning: anti-hypocrite, anti-degenerate, PUA scam revealing.

http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/civil-liberties-and-single-reactionary.html

First of all, a reactionary is a gentleman (or a lady).  A gentleman (or a lady) doesn’t whine.  If he finds himself whining, it will be because his leg has been crushed by a truck and he’s in enormous fucking pain.  It won’t be because some meanie is denying him his universal human right to rule the country, or his 1/10^8 share in that right, or whatever.

For the benefit of new or simple readers: We iz not libertardians.
They’re still statist because they believe the State gives them rights.
Sweet, summer child…

The worst PUA scum types are basically going “those pesky meddling bigot conservatives wanna take away our right to rape drunk chicks!”
Yeah. Except… that was never a right.

Hedonism was never a right. The ancient hedons were never this bad.
It’s barbaric, a stable society cannot encourage it. The PC term is antisocial.

There’s no such thing as a right to sex, you degenerate leftist.
You know it’s bad when you’re more entitled than Big Red.

The Sexual Revolution was the beginning of the end. If you can’t finger that as the source of degeneracy, you are not a conservative.

Last one should be Crusaderism, but they aren’t religious.

Signs of an Emotionally Immature Adult

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-superhuman-mind/201611/10-signs-emotionally-immature-adult

Little Prince (or Princess) Syndrome, when it occurs in adulthood, is also known as Peter Pan Syndrome.”
Little Prince (or Princess) Syndrome is related to, but not identical to, Emperor Syndrome, a term is primarily used to describe Chinese boys with no siblings who behave like little tyrants.”

Unfair, Princess Syndrome is more common with the Chinese women at present. You don’t see Chinese men giggling and running round big Chanel stores with their friends on Daddy’s credit card.

“Little Princes and Princesses, as I define them, are grown men or women who act as if they are selfish children, narcissistic teenagers, or irresponsible young adults, and feel entitled to behave as they see fit. Following are 10 traits typical of someone living with Little Prince or Princess Syndrome. (For simplicity’s sake, I use the term Little Prince below, and refer to the role of mothers, not father, but the signs are applicable to all genders.)”

A selection;

He acts like a child, a teenager, or a person who is much younger than he is. He might throw temper tantrums or party all night with people 10 years younger than him.

He acts as if women should serve him. He expects to be taken care of and be pampered on demand. He will happily take but never give.

He cannot maintain a long-term, stable romantic relationship. Former partners end up becoming his enemies or new playmates.

He is commitment-phobic in nearly all areas of life—despite having a needy attachment style. It can take him six months to commit to buying a new sofa.

I have seen that.
My words-
“It’s a sofa, you can dump it.”

They see their possessions as an extension of them.
Possessions include people.

If you don’t make them look good, you’re gone.
The excuse is usually pleasing others, so they also look good to you. B.S.

Btw, Asians invented ghosting. You made less money? You missed a promotion? They forget to send you a dinner party invite. It makes you wonder if they’re capable of the friendship thing with one another too.

He is often passive-aggressive, meaning he has a tendency to engage in an indirect expression of hostility through acts such as subtle insults, sullen behavior, stubbornness, or a deliberate failure to accomplish required tasks.

They are not subtle.
Have you ever met a subtle man?… I rest my case.

He is a narcissist or exhibits a childish selfishness. If something is even mildly inconvenient, he will resist doing it.

Emotional child.

He rarely thinks anything is his fault. He blames everyone around him for everything that goes wrong in his life—even his mother if he can’t find another scapegoat.”

Victim blaming, victim mentality… tendency to complain about victim culture because they think they’re entitled to that pity, not that it’s wrong. Whiny and lots of nagging, like an old woman.

If you find this useful, you might find these too.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/is-america/201601/con-artists-and-their-marks

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-flux/201610/9-classic-traits-manipulative-people

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201609/meet-the-real-narcissists-theyre-not-what-you-think
“For example, he suggests, some narcissists can be of the “communal” variety and actually devote their lives to helping others. They might even agree with such statements as “I’m the most helpful person I know,” or “I will be known for the good deeds I have done.” “Everyone has met grandiosely altruistic martyrs, self-sacrificing to the point where you can’t stand to be in the room with them,” Malkin says.

And there are highly introverted, or “vulnerable,” narcissists. These individuals feel they are more temperamentally sensitive than others. They react poorly to even gentle criticism and need constant reassurance. The way they feel special might actually be negative: They may see themselves as the ugliest person at the party or feel like a misunderstood genius in a world that refuses to recognize their gifts.”

They can’t back up their claims and if you compare them, they’re usually average. Pointing this out triggers narc rage.

They don’t just ‘use’ others, they use others as…. it’s instrumental.

They cannot self-regulate, they use other people as emotional tampons (especially men) and require excess ‘take’ and their giving is inferior, low quality but they over-value it because *they* are dispensing it. Thinking you’re special is in your actions, not a set of words. Tend to idolize others too, broken perceptions.

Link: The stupidity of ‘White Sharia’, it’s anti-reality

They’re the type of kid at school who just lied lied lied lied lied and expected everyone would just go along with it.

In a little kid, it’s passable. In men over the age of 21, it’s a mental illness.

I’d bet a lot of them are male borderlines, considering their neurosis over wife abandonment. They get hostile if you question it, there is such a thing as a happy marriage, just not one that involves them. They are the problem.
They don’t mention most of the worst divorce stories are actually inter-racial, white husband and Asian wife.
You’re not supposed to ask, it triggers their narcissistic rage when you question their brain. There isn’t much in there.

https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2017/06/white-sharia-alt-right-at-war-with.html

It actually came from the manosphere, not the Alt Right. They bled over here and want to bring their dindu Muh Dick ways with them. They think this is mature and manly, as opposed to the shameful self-control of a bonobo.
The woman question? Is that the best name they can come up with? That sounds like a pathetic attempt to draw focus.

Oh, what would that look like?
Like, most rapists are women?
Most murderers are women?
Most deadbeat parents are mothers?
Er… yeah, it isn’t a *woman* problem, is it?

It comes down to – women won’t be my free whore, the problem is women, the whores. 

They want to control the return to traditionalism because they’re too scared of women to be nice to them and perhaps maybe marry and pass on their shit(skin) genes.

Look up the Iceland strike. They’d die without female cooperation. They deserve to, by Parental Investment Theory. Humans need both parents or they’re messed up. A lot of these guys love/hate their mother, especially if their father cheated on her. To this day, they blame her for his fuck-ups, literally.
Sharia only works on the low IQ, it’s designed to keep them from killing each other. The high IQ have meritocracy and cooperation and that’s why we’re civilized. The Ice Age improved our genome past that point, see A Troublesome Inheritance.
The history they claim has never existed, they believe in the mommy-wife apron Fantasyland that only existed in 50s vacuum cleaner adverts. And if women are homemakers, men must be soldiers. You don’t get to sit on your ass in the unions or be a paid-up party man.

They are totally ignorant of ancient and European history but spout off about white people. The keyboard alphas there are 9/10 non-white, it’s the dirty secret of PUA – brown man seeks white harem.

Let’s take a few of the rationalisations;

“Women’s sexual desires, almost universally, are straightforward and one-dimensional; they desire the physically strong and dominant man.”
Biology says that’s men with simple lust, quit projecting. You can’t even get a woman to orgasm, don’t pretend you know how we work. In long-term mate selection studies, women choose the ‘Dad’ model and reject the ‘Cad’, you are literally 180-degrees wrong.
“Therefore, race is not a romantic factor for women. They simply want the strongest.”
White women miscegenate the least in all dating website studies. On theapricity forum, for example, many of the ‘white people preservation’ men, are dating Asians.
“And white men are pussies, which is why white women increasingly prefer non-white men.”
Would a white man write that? Who planted that idea? Disciple of Roosh?
Who told you who they prefer?
Where’s your data? Your opinion is not valid, at all.


Why all the assaults and harassment and rape gangs if the white women actually wanted them?

“Anglin attempts to pound his readers into submission by aggressively insisting his claims are settled science—this is a common tactic people use to try to cover for the fact that they’re full of crap. You’ll notice, for instance, that nowhere in the article does he link to a single scientific study. (Although he does provide links for his readers to purchase steroids.)”
Oh, steroid brain. It reduces your humanity.

If it’s settled, you must have a list of studies with cracking methodology.
…..They never do.

But they’re definitely projecting because as this genius links

They have Yellow Fever and want to pretend the white women didn’t want them first.
https://meetville.com/blog/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/

Instead of attacking White Fever, they attack women.
Almost as if the men writing it….have it?
divide and conquer, cleave the white man from women, and the women are defenseless…
POS r-types

Their greatest enemy is chivalry, which is actually human decency.
Chivalry also applied to other gentlemen, like, they don’t even bother knowing what words mean, the illiterate brown bastards. It existed in the upper classes because they lugged around the big weapons…like cops carrying guns now. They follow a code, right? What do you think that is?

“The only consistent messages from the data is that the majority of women want a man who (1) is taller than them and (2) is not a fat slob.”
where they fail us
they think they can raise an incest baby grown in a fake womb
but they lack the time out of their busy schedule of bile to lose the chub

Women are sexist if they don’t want a short, balding, lazy fatass.
– they’re literally fat acceptance feminists with the sexes inverted

They don’t know how repulsive they are. It’s the entitlement. They think Patriarchy would entitle them to a wife. Like, what, fathers care so little they hand out coupons?

And I bet Mr 3.5 thinks he would get a cute, 17yo white 8.

You prove financial stability, the woman provides her fertility, idiot.
Women do provide – life. You can’t print life at the bank.

In Biblical times, men had rites of passage. You didn’t pass? You didn’t pass on your genes. Stop crying, baby.
They don’t actually study how patriarchies worked, especially with white people.
You’d get strung up for defiling someone’s daughter – for some reason they aren’t too keen on listening to rape victims…. acting like the rapist is the Real Victim Here.
They use fake screen names and no photo because you’d see the racial composition here, and the lower average IQ of those groups.

“Are you beginning to see just how far the ideology of the neo-patriarchic Alt Right is disconnected from reality?”

the word is ‘psychotic’, Gerry

“Just try to think about the real world for ten seconds. Which of these statements do you honestly think is closer to the truth: (A) The most attractive 5% of women tend to date the most attractive 5% of men. (B.) The most attractive 5% of women tend to date the toughest 5% of men. Of course, there is some overlap between these two categories of men, but clearly (A) is the right answer. If you’re an adult and haven’t noticed this by now, you’re either dumb as a rock or have very eccentric tastes in women.”

They are too dumb to believe in Darwin. Roosh actually reviewed a book of philosophy by a modern writer and thought he disproved evolution. You see, Darwin would mean women are right to have standards – the peacock displays, not the peahen.

They don’t believe in male beauty or more literally, the manosphere refuses to believe in their own ugliness.
They can’t rub testosterone cream over their mug and look like Brad Pitt.

Practically, none of this will ever happen.

How are you gonna get these women from their fathers? Is that not pedophilia? How can you marry someone without consent? Won’t they just throw themselves down the stairs if you rape them pregnant?

The lookism guys are much smarter and genuinely self-improving. The PUAs hate those guys, because they get results.

They know deep down it’s about them and their deep ugliness but this makes them bitter. They have to cheat, like an Asian chick getting tit implants to get a white boy interested. For the first time in history, the low SES have a voice online.

“This Manosphere/neo-patriarchy stuff isn’t just embarrassing because it’s so thoroughly wrong, it also comes off as really pathetic. The Alt Right is supposed to be a serious ideological movement, not a self-help seminar. For a movement that spends so much time worrying about trying to appear as the “cool kids” (way too much time), you’d think people around here would be sensitive to how “beta” this looks to most people. You live in a country where women consider white men to be most attractive, so if you’re having a hard time out there, I’m sorry brother, but that’s on you. Don’t taint the ethnonationalist cause by associating it with your sexual frustrations.”

They are not Alt Right.
They are MGTOW who reject K-selected unions and never want to marry.
They are genetic suicides who don’t want children unless they can abandon them to a nanny.
There is nothing traditional in them. They think it will oppress or upset women, that’s their motive, to hurt women in revenge. [cough Elliot Rodger cough]
Since when has a good husband and motherhood upset a K-woman????
WHEN?

These losers call themselves redpill but ignore any data that isn’t cherry-picked to cater to their feelings.
Oh, but women are special snowflakes because …periods?
What’s their excuse, broflakes? They’re like Trigglypuff if you mention the world doesn’t revolve around their micropenis.
They can’t attract women because they hate women. Duh.
“Since ideological truth is subjective, you can base your ideology on anything, but just because you can, doesn’t mean that you should. One thing the neo-patriarchists should do though, is man-up and admit they were wrong.”

They’re Peter Pan fuckboys, they’re trash. They’re so passive aggressive they’ve sabotaged their own lives, let them go and destroy themselves. They have the right.

The strangest thing about these discussions?

They deny HBD (on race) but then try to mouth off on HBD topics…. with no awareness of how HBD findings are compiled or any real, good data.

They’re sub-100 IQs trying to pass themselves off as mathematically literate.
Milo started this with one (literally one) article on an IQ finding.

He didn’t want to be scientific and get a psychometrician in, just punch down (as he sees it). It’s like a 13yo’s view of strength, the bully model.
Their role models are a Jewish homo and Roosh, who supposedly has both Jewish and Muslim blood…. that explains the nose job, frankly…

yeah, these guys wanna bring in Christian patriarchy, we can trust them!

Bonus: the sad autism of notch counters.

The phenomenon pointed up here with our lad is that of the “notch count.” In his case, the notches are for amusingly inconsequential things: hugging his cousin, having an internet “girlfriend” for a week or so, etc. Our lad exults in his “success” with the ladies, when in truth his supposed achievements have been minimal to non-existent.  But to chortle at his embarrassingly unearned exultation misses the broader critique implied here. Even if that which counts for legitimate “notches” in our lad’s estimation doesn’t amount to much in our perception, his degradation doesn’t consist in his absence of “legitimate” action; rather, it lies in the fact that he, like many men, base their feeling of masculine self-worth on the number of “notches” they have obtained.

from https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/10/autistic-notch-count.html

They’re trying to be the popular girl…. by being sluts.
Manwhores have the dignity of jailbait. Look how much of a fake they can be, to get women to laugh!
It’s counterphobic, they hate/fear women so spend all their spare time… literally fucking women over.

The bad women couldn’t control men without sex. Feminists told men that being sluts was something to brag about….. figure it out. I hate to see adult males demean themselves.

Statists want taxpayer-funded pussy

It finally happened.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Incels/comments/4rlc3x/the_only_way_i_could_ever_get_a_wife_or/

I’ve seen people mention (uncabob? I think?) that all this sexual entitlement is essentially calling for AA for supposed ‘incels’ and they’re finally just admitting that ‘game’ is a marketing gimmick cum Ponzi where they circlejerk e-books that don’t attract a wife, at the very least, which is the only way to make sexual entitlement a legitimate thing.

via The Kids Are Alt Right VI

Previous generations of men would be ashamed at this desperation.

‘Incel’ is normal for the unmarried and …not a sin.

Fornication, prostitution, adultery – all sins.
This is why, it makes for weak men.

“My problems are society’s problems” I bet he calls women solipsistic narcissists or something. Men won’t be widely respected again until they whip this trash into line.
Only one group has the right to have ALL its ‘needs’ met – babies. Babies can’t consent.

<obligatory Brave New World reference>

Everyone belongs to everyone else. – rapists everywhere

I bet they’d still reserve the ‘right’ to reject 1-3s.

It seems, like the ‘refugees’, beggars can indeed be choosers.
When society has gone insane.