Monoculture Bible quotes

God separated peoples for their own good. That was his Will?

Do-gooders play God with the hubris and pathological altruism.

I’m not going through and finding them all.

https://www.biblehub.com/bsb/isaiah/65.htm
“21They will build houses and dwell in them; they will plant vineyards and eat their fruit. 22No longer will they build houses for others to inhabit, nor plant for others to eat. For as is the lifetime of a tree, so will be the days of My people, and My chosen ones will fully enjoy the work of their hands. 23They will not labor in vain or bear children doomed to disaster; for they will be a people blessed by the LORD—they and their descendants with them”

THEIR descendants.

Their OWN descendants.

Those doubting the intent:
“Unlike the past, invaders will not take their houses and confiscate their vineyards. For my people will live as long as trees, and my chosen ones will have time to enjoy their hard-won gains.” in another translation

“if you reject My statutes, despise My ordinances, and neglect to carry out all My commandments, and so break My covenant, 16then this is what I will do to you:

I will bring upon you sudden terror, wasting disease, and fever that will destroy your sight and drain your life. You will sow your seed in vain, because your enemies will eat it. 17And I will set My face against you, so that you will be defeated by your enemies. Those who hate you will rule over you, and you will flee when no one pursues you”
https://www.biblehub.com/leviticus/26-16.htm

The people adulterating their bloodline are in for a shock.

“The LORD will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with severe heat and drought, and with blight and mildew; these will pursue you until you perish.”
https://www.biblehub.com/deuteronomy/28-22.htm

The fake Christians don’t read the actual book.

If your priest says one thing and the book another, the ‘priest’ is wrong.

Political phobias don’t exist, it’s gaslighting.

https://www.biblehub.com/psalms/78.htm
“23Yet He commanded the clouds above

and opened the doors of the heavens.

24He rained down manna for them to eat;

He gave them grain from heaven.

25Man ate the bread of angels;

He sent them food in abundance.

26He stirred the east wind from the heavens

and drove the south wind by His might.

27He rained meat on them like dust,

and winged birds like the sand of the sea.

28He felled them in the midst of their camp,

all around their dwellings.

29So they ate and were well filled,

for He gave them what they craved.

30Yet before they had filled their desire,

with the food still in their mouths,

31God’s anger flared against them,

and He put to death their strongest

and subdued the young men of Israel.”

 

Why do atheists and CHINOs think Christianity is some bland, blanket pro-male thing?

He’s harder on sinning men. Greater power (head of a single household) comes greater responsibility (more rules, personally).

 

“32In spite of all this, they kept on sinning;

despite His wonderful works, they did not believe.

33So He ended their days in futility,

and their years in sudden terror.

34When He slew them, they would seek Him;

they repented and searched for God.

35And they remembered that God was their Rock,

that God Most High was their Redeemer.

36But they deceived Him with their mouths,

and lied to Him with their tongues.

37Their hearts were disloyal to Him,

and they were unfaithful to His covenant.”

 

The worst type of Satanist is a fake Christian. Deathbed conversion types still go to Hell.

You can’t trick a deity. Only they would be dumb enough to think they could.

 

“38Yet He was compassionate;

He forgave their iniquity and did not destroy them.

He often restrained His anger

and did not unleash His full wrath.

39He remembered that they were but flesh,

a passing breeze that does not return.

40How often they disobeyed Him in the wilderness

and grieved Him in the desert!

41Again and again they tested God

and provoked the Holy One of Israel.

42They did not remember His power —

the day He redeemed them from the adversary,

43when He performed His signs in Egypt

and His wonders in the fields of Zoan.”

 

Christianity isn’t a convenient thing you can pick up like a diet or for politics when the wages of sin are due.

This respite of time to actually repent and ‘sin no more’ (the condition) is a grace period, literally, because if ignored, the punishment gets worse when it comes.

 

“44He turned their rivers to blood,

and from their streams they could not drink.”

The Thames?

“45He sent swarms of flies that devoured them,

and frogs that devastated them.”

That one is funny.

“46He gave their crops to the grasshopper,

the fruit of their labor to the locust.

47He killed their vines with hailstones

and their sycamore-figs with sleet.

48He abandoned their cattle to the hail

and their livestock to bolts of lightning.”

 

Wow, that’s kinda starting to happen now. On a huge scale. Was this describing a climate shift? GSM?

 

“49He unleashed His fury against them,

wrath, indignation, and calamity—

a band of destroying angels.”

 

only dumb middle-aged hippies want to meet an angel, they’re metal

 

“50He cleared a path for His anger;

He did not spare them from death

but delivered their lives to the plague.

51He struck all the firstborn of Egypt,

the virility in the tents of Ham.”

 

The people complaining about aged male fertility are funny like… I thought you said the Lord would provide? Maybe having kids right now would cause them to starve later?

 

“52He led out His people like sheep

and guided them like a flock in the wilderness.

53He led them safely, so they did not fear,

but the sea engulfed their enemies.

54He brought them to His holy land,

to the hill country His right hand had acquired.

55He drove out nations before them

and apportioned their inheritance;”

 

Is it colonialism if God did it? I say no.

 

“He settled the tribes of Israel in their tents.

56But they tested and disobeyed God Most High,

for they did not keep His decrees.

57They turned back and were faithless like their fathers,

twisted like a faulty bow.”

 

Why are men like this? Was Adam this much of a shithead? There are TEN major rules. Ten! You can’t even do that right!

 

“58They enraged Him with their high places

and provoked His jealousy with their idols.

59On hearing it, God was furious

and rejected Israel completely.

60He abandoned the tabernacle of Shiloh,

the tent He had pitched among men.

61He delivered His strength to captivity,

and His splendor to the hand of the adversary.

62He surrendered His people to the sword

because He was enraged by His heritage.”

 

Stop f-ing it up.

 

“63Fire consumed His young men,

and their maidens were left without wedding songs.”

I’d rather be a woman in that scenario. Note that the women were spared because they weren’t sinning by setting the wrong tone of society as the moral authority. In Christianity, men are bound by the higher standards. It’s right there.

 

“64His priests fell by the sword,

but His widows could not lament.”

 

Which book are they reading?

Fake priests are going to be an interesting case study.

https://www.biblehub.com/1_kings/8-37.htm

 

https://www.biblehub.com/job/31-8.htm

“6let God weigh me with honest scales,

and He will know my integrity.

7If my steps have turned from the path,

if my heart has followed my eyes,

or impurity has stuck to my hands,

8then may another eat what I have sown,

and may my crops be uprooted.

9If my heart has been enticed by my neighbor’s wife,

or I have lurked at his door,

10then may my own wife grind grain for another,

and may other men sleep with her.”

 

Being a creep is illegal, by God’s law. Lechery is a sin. These degenerate men slagging off the women of the same cloth are really mental. All they do is follow their eyes, usually overseas. Pluck ’em out then, if yoga pants offend your Amish sensibilities. Women have to make a mental effort not to ogle the topless billboard men constantly, learn the skill!

The Bible literally says the desire to cuck your wife will lead to her cucking you. Cmon.

Later:
“24If I have put my trust in gold

or called pure gold my security,

25if I have rejoiced in my great wealth

because my hand had gained so much,

26if I have regarded the sun in its radiance

or the moon moving in splendor,

27so that my heart was secretly enticed

and my hand threw a kiss from my mouth,

28this would also be an iniquity to be judged,

for I would have denied God on high.

29If I have rejoiced in my enemy’s ruin,

or exulted when evil befell him—

30I have not allowed my mouth to sin

by asking for his life with a curse—

31if the men of my house have not said,

‘Who is there who has not had his fill?’—

32but no stranger had to lodge on the street,

for my door has been open to the traveler—”

note: not settler, the passing-through

“33if I have covered my transgressions like Adam

by hiding my guilt in my heart,

34because I greatly feared the crowds,

and the contempt of the clans terrified me,

so that I kept silent

and would not go outside—”

crowded cities, huh?

“38if my land cries out against me

and its furrows weep together,

39if I have devoured its produce without payment

or broken the spirit of its tenants,

40then let briers grow instead of wheat

and stinkweed instead of barley.””

Briefly:

https://www.biblehub.com/isaiah/65-22.htm
“They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands”

https://biblehub.com/isaiah/5-8.htm
“Woe to you who add house to house and join field to field till no space is left and you live alone in the land.”

he will dwell in ruined cities, in abandoned houses destined to crumble.
https://biblehub.com/job/15-28.htm

“Woe to him who builds his palace by unrighteousness, and his upper rooms without justice, who makes his countrymen serve without pay, and will not give him his wages,
https://biblehub.com/jeremiah/22-13.htm

 

It’s ironic a book for the Middle East talks about guest right and breaking no law.
Rescue the victim of robbery from the hand of his oppressor. Do no wrong or violence to the foreigner, the fatherless, or the widow. Do not shed innocent blood in this place.”

“17“But your eyes and heart are set on nothing

except your own dishonest gain,

on shedding innocent blood,

on practicing extortion and oppression.””

Jer 22, btw

 

“21I warned you when you were secure.

You said, ‘I will not listen.’

This has been your way from youth,

that you have not obeyed My voice.

22The wind will drive away all your shepherds,

and your lovers will go into captivity.

Then you will be ashamed and humiliated

because of all your wickedness.

Why are he and his descendants hurled out

and cast into a land they do not know?

29O land, land, land,

hear the word of the LORD!

30This is what the LORD says:

“Enroll this man as childless,

a man who will not prosper in his lifetime.

None of his descendants will prosper

to sit on the throne of David

or to rule again in Judah.”

MGTOWs are anti-God if they’re still fornicating. It’s right there.

Remember, the people are the culture:

Psalm 127:
“If the Lord does not build the house, the work of the builders is useless; if the Lord does not protect the city, it does no good for the sentries to stand guard.”

If you make excuses for the manwhores, we’re all ruined. It specifically applies the harshest standards on the men time and time again.

A culture must be built up by its own people, not outsiders. Any citizens who ruin it with decadence and degeneracy, ruin it for everyone. Thy name is corruption.

A couple of these one could dismiss with prejudice but altogether it builds up to a picture.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/08/26/they-dont-quote-this-line-2/
https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/07/21/context/

Quite a picture.

Context in the Bible

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Why mention sexually immoral and adultery also? By modern, i.e. false, meanings those would be the same point? The same act i.e. sexing someone you aren’t married to, a particular type of intercourse.

I’ve been re-reading the sections with the word ‘adultery’, with the historically accurate context of adultery and it was there the whole time.

The Bible did say to test things so I looked and I’m shocked it’s clearly there in the phrasing. The only possible interpretation given the multiple instances of context like this is the Thou shalt not mongrelize linguistic origin of the Sixth Commandment.

This doesn’t bode well for the weebs and other outbreeding fetishists. “Their end will correspond to their deeds.”

The narrow modern definition is interpreted falsely (with intellectual dishonesty) and this lends new credence to the concept of the Way being narrow i.e. having the full context.

Romans 16:18 For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.

That would be a great way for a Satanist to destroy us, sell us a publicized misinterpretation of a Commandment so many break it. It also justifies their own lusts (belly, loins) as not sinful for the same acts. They flatter greedy fools (the simple) and what are men most easily deceived by? The phallus.

2 Timothy 4:3-4 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

Equalism aka Liberal Creationism is the myth. Nobody who buys into it can be right-wing i.e. reality-based.

We even have genetics studies, we can physically SEE the differences!

Proverbs: Take the garment of one who puts up security for a stranger; hold it in pledge if it is done for an outsider.

e.g.

Consider the context of:

James 4:4 You adulterers! Don’t you realize that friendship with the world makes you an enemy of God? I say it again: If you want to be a friend of the world, you make yourself an enemy of God.

with the modern limited sense, the use of the concept adultery there is erroneous.

They must mean the deeper, broader rooted sense of the sin.

FYI, scroll to the Sixth Commandment

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nl720.htm

“In most translations of the Bible, Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are translated: “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” In the literal translation of the Anointed Standard Translation of the New Testament and in the true translation of the Ten Commandments in The Truth Unveiled, these passages are translated as: “You will not mongrelize”.

In many people’s minds, there is a very great difference between these two translations, though, as we shall see later, this is due primarily to the purposeful degeneration of the etymology of the word adultery. At issue in the Greek Septuagint and in the Greek New Testament are two Greek words: ou moicheuseis. …

In the Latin Vulgate, Exodus 20:13 was translated as non moechaberis and Romans 13:9 as non adulterabis. The Latin word moechaberis is an inflected form of moechari, a transliteration of the Greek moicheuo, and is of little etymological importance since what it means is merely dependent upon what the Greek word means, which we will explore. However, what is important is adulterabis, an inflected form of the word adultero, since this is the Latin word most often used in the Vulgate and elsewhere to translate the Greek word moicheuo. 

The Greek word ou and the Latin word non are simply negative particles, translated not. Thus, the words that we need to define in order to determine the correct translation of Exodus 20:13 and Romans 13:9 are the Greek word moicheuo and the Latin word adultero. 

First, in order to define the word moicheuo, let us turn to a commonly used and commonly available dictionary, the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, edited by Gerhard Kittel and translated into English by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Now let us note that Kittel was a well-renowned German Greek scholar and is held in high-esteem by the scholarly community. 

Under the entry word moicheuo, the following definition is given: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” [In the German original, Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament, we find the original words of Kittel: “auch von Vermischung von Tier und Mensch oder von Mischung verschiedener Rassen”]. 

This, of course, is the classical definition of mongrelization. So the Greek of the New Testament and the Greek Septuagint confirm that the translation “You will not mongrelize” is correct. 

Now that we have defined the Greek, what about the Latin Vulgate? Now we must define the Latin word adultero, and we shall do so using the finest Latin dictionary currently available and the standard among Latin scholars, the Oxford Latin Dictionary: “To mix (a substance or kind) with another, adulterate: to impair the purity or strength of, to give a variety of appearances to, change . . . to corrupt, debase.” Once again, when this is applied to people, we have mongrelization. So we find age-old agreement between the Latin and the Greek. 

Therefore, using two of the most respected reference works available regarding Biblical Greek and the Latin language, and simply looking the words up, we find that these verses in the Bible are in fact an explicit prohibition against race-mixing. 

To any intellectually honest person, the above definitions should be more than enough to convince him that the Bible explicitly prohibits race-mixing. This is exactly why the coalition of evil is so against a true and literal translation of the Word of God. In fact, it may be stated that their theology is little more than a justification system for the breaking of this divine law of God. If the translation You will not mongrelize is wrong, then the two reference works cited above, certainly two of the most prestigious works of their type available, are also wrong. Any legitimate Greek or Latin scholars would agree with these definitions; anyone who would disagree with these definitions have in fact turned their backs on legitimate scholarship and should stop being hypocritical and admit that they do not believe the Bible instead of trying to change what it and what legitimate scholars say.

Now, many people will simply go and find a dictionary that defines the above words as adultery, and then ignorantly presume that adultery is defined as marital infidelity and simply forget about the two definitions cited above.

To show the stupidity and intellectual dishonesty of these people, I have previously written a work entitled Hidden Truth, now published under the title The Truth Unveiled, which gave many more proofs of the definitions of the Greek and Latin family of words commonly translated adultery, and examined in detail every Biblical passage, both Old and New Testaments, where these words occurred. That is not the purpose of this present work. The reader is encouraged to also read the chapter regarding this family of words in The Truth Unveiled for a complete Biblical analysis of this family of words. The objective herein is to examine in detail the etymology of both the Greek and Latin words commonly translated adultery, the ways these words were used in other Greek and Latin literature and in key passages in the Bible, and to explore how the web of deception regarding these words has been woven through the degeneration of language. The information presented hereafter is indisputable and not a subject of debate: one will either be intellectually honest and believe it or one will suffer the fate of all liars and those who help make a lie. 

A post about truth

Let’s see how much I can teach you without actually telling you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_death


The thing worse than rebellion is the thing that causes rebellion. Frederick Douglass
When the sword of rebellion is drawn, the sheath should be thrown away. English proverb


The damaging pomo myth of America is feelsbad=evil.





Magic Skirt theory. Wearing a skirt/looking like a woman, doesn’t make you a woman. Ask a Scot. You can’t buy citizenship to womanhood. Similarly, your friends, your passport and your politics don’t make you a man. Identity comes from something deeper and like a snake’s skin, you constantly grow a new one, a better one. Men are allowed to be stupid, but women are encouraged.
You are not wrong in your motives, but your methods are.


Good boy, sit. Listen.



?
Men call themselves philosophers because they truly believe stating the obvious to nobody is profound.
I don’t mind when people laugh at me. If you fact-check all I have predicted over the years, I neither need nor want to laugh.
I only seem quite stupid at times so people listen to me, and then they might take things in subliminally while they’re judging me. That is the female art of playing dumb. …Men go pro.
eg The best way to kill third-wave feminism’s power was to introduce an intersectional approach. The less pretty white women, the less attention; the less attention, the more acting up and the less cool. The public soon follow. So much for the years of Youtube videos and millions of scornfully worded screeds on blogs nobody reads… you could see the other pawns but missed the board entirely. 😉
Why don’t women use much logic, generally?
Men will never notice something that happens to women until it happens to them too.
Down with Western Civ? Which sex would you target first? ..Ah.
Stay with me, do not stop thinking.
…Logically, why?


Part 2 of Brass Balls: The Analysis coming whenever the fuck I feel like it.
“later”
I know you all want to feel important, but you’re already important, so could you just listen when people are trying to help you/r thede? Or is e-celebrity worth losing your future? You are the sons of the world’s greatest minds and conquerors. You invented open-mindedness. I figured I’d be a philosopher and yes, that’s why the blog title. Five years of hinting at my sex before I had to openly admit it in practically every post before anyone would believe me. Many of you don’t, two years, almost three later. Because science? Really?
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/disenchanted

There’s no argument for white power structures without white ingenuity, culture and creativity.
The same would hold true for any race. Learn.



Misogyny = rich men telling poor men it’s women’s fault. Men fucking other men (MSM).
Sexual orientation theory is a social construct.


I earned this holiday from planet Earth. Brexit can be re-written without me.

One week until Saturn hits Capricorn.

Quotes by Nikola Tesla on Mama Tesla

Yes, I’m calling her that. You can’t stop me.
Square brackets are me.
You can see how important she was to him. Read the damn book (My Inventions) yourself.

I must trace to my mother’s influence whatever inventiveness I possess

My mother descended from one of the oldest families in the country and a line of inventors.”

My mother was an inventor of the first order and would, I believe, have achieved great things had she not been so remote from modern life and its multifold opportunities.  She invented and constructed all kinds of tools and devices and wove the finest designs from thread which was spun by her.  She even planted the seeds, raised the plants and separated the fibers herself.  She worked indefatigably, from break of day till late at night, and most of the wearing apparel and furnishings of the home was the product of her hands.  When she was past sixty, her fingers were still nimble enough to tie three knots in an eyelash.”

“Of all things I liked books the best.  My father had a large library and whenever I could manage I tried to satisfy my passion for reading.  He did not permit it and would fly into a rage when he caught me in the act.  He hid the candles when he found that I was reading in secret.  He did not want me to spoil my eyes.  But I obtained tallow, made the wicking and cast the sticks into tin forms, and every night I would bush the keyhole and the cracks and read, often till dawn, when all others slept and my mother started on her arduous daily task. [She knew] On one occasion I came across a novel entitled “Abafi” (the Son of Aba), a Serbian translation of a well known Hungarian writer, Josika. This work somehow awakened my dormant powers of will and I began to practise self-control.  At first my resolutions faded like snow in April, but in a little while I conquered my weakness and felt a pleasure I never knew before—that of doing as I willed.  In the course of time this vigorous mental exercise became second nature.  At the outset my wishes had to be subdued but gradually desire and will grew to be identical.  After years of such discipline I gained so complete a mastery over myself that I toyed with passions which have meant destruction to some of the strongest men. …. On frequent occasions he [father] gave vent to his anger and contempt but my mother was different.  She understood the character of men and knew that one’s salvation could only be brought about through his own efforts.  One afternoon, I remember, when I had lost all my money and was craving for a game, she came to me with a roll of bills and said, “Go and enjoy yourself.  The sooner you lose all we possess the better it will be.  I know that you will get over it.” She was right.  I conquered my passion then and there and only regretted that it had not been a hundred times as strong.  I not only vanquished but tore it from my heart so as not to leave even a trace of desire.  Ever since that time I have been as indifferent to any form of gambling as to picking teeth.”

“Regaining my senses I realized with consternation that I was unable to visualize scenes from my life except those of infancy, the very first ones that had entered my consciousness.  Curiously enough, these appeared before my vision with startling distinctness and afforded me welcome relief.  Night after night, when retiring, I would think of them and more and more of my previous existence was revealed.  The image of my mother was always the principal figure in the spectacle that slowly unfolded, and a consuming desire to see her again gradually took possession of me.  This feeling grew so strong that I resolved to drop all work and satisfy my longing.  But I found it too hard to break away from the laboratory, and several months elapsed during which I had succeeded in reviving all the impressions of my past life up to the spring of 1892.  In the next picture that came out of the mist of oblivion, I saw myself at the Hotel de la Paix in Paris just coming to from one of my peculiar sleeping spells, which had been caused by prolonged exertion of the brain.  Imagine the pain and distress I felt when it flashed upon my mind that a dispatch was handed to me at that very moment bearing the sad news that my mother was dying.  I remembered how I made the long journey home without an hour of rest and how she passed away after weeks of agony! It was especially remarkable that during all this period of partially obliterated memory I was fully alive to everything touching on the subject of my research.  I could recall the smallest details and the least significant observations in my experiments and even recite pages of text and complex mathematical formulae.”

Supposed skeptics don’t like to discuss his psychic visions but it was integral to his process.

“… I reflected that the conditions for a look into the beyond were most favorable, for my mother was a woman of genius and particularly excelling in the powers of intuition. …”

The ones Einstein called crucial to genius. When looking for his purpose;

“Up to that time I never realized that I possessed any particular gift of discovery, but Lord Rayleigh, whom I always considered as an ideal man of science, had said so and if that was the case, I felt that I should concentrate on some big idea. At this time, as at many other times in the past, my thoughts turned towards my Mother’s teaching. The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if we concentrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great power. My Mother had taught me to seek all truth in the Bible; therefore I devoted the next few months to the study of this work.”

Video: Champagne socialist Owen Jones fawning over Marx + Marx quotes + Frankfurt school

If Karl, instead of writing a lot about Capital, had made a lot of Capital, it would have been much better. ~ Henriette Marx, his mother.

If Owen Jones says something is fact, you can be fairly confident it is false. Example: 1. Men veer conservative, women veer liberal. 2. Marx condones forcing revolution on those who do not desire it and in general was a terrible human being. 3. You will never see a poor man in politics.

“I understand that it may not be considered good form to suggest that class issues are as important as issues of race, gender or sexuality, despite the fact that from my own perspective they seem perhaps even more fundamental and crucially relevant. After all, while in the West after many years of arduous struggle we are now allowed to elect women, non-white people and even, surely at least in theory, people of openly alternative sexualities, I am relatively certain that we will never be allowed to elect a man or woman of any race or persuasion who is poor.” ~ Alan Moore

The representation of private interests … abolishes all natural and spiritual distinctions by enthroning in their stead the immoral, irrational and soulless abstraction of a particular material object and a particular consciousness which is slavishly subordinated to this object. ~ Marx, shutting down individuality

Our mutual value is for us the value of our mutual objects.Hence for us man himself is mutually of no value. ~ Marx.

The slave frees himself when, of all the relations of private property, he abolishes only the relation of slavery and thereby becomes a proletarian; the proletarian can free himself only by abolishing private property in general. ~ Engels, when is Owen Jones becoming poor and moving to Tower Hamlets?

The worst thing that can befall a leader of an extreme party is to be compelled to take over a government in an epoch when the movement is not yet ripe for the domination of the class which he represents and for the realisation of the measures which that domination would imply … ~ Engels

The democratic petty bourgeois, far from wanting to transform the whole society in the interests of the revolutionary proletarians, only aspire to make the existing society as tolerable for themselves as possible. ~ Marx and Engels, fairly good summary of champagne socialism

Labour is, in the first place, a process in which both man and Nature participate, and in which man of his own accord starts, regulates, and controls the material re-actions between himself and Nature. He opposes himself to Nature as one of her own forces, …. ~ Marx, who didn’t work.

On the level plain, simple mounds look like hills; and the imbecile flatness of the present bourgeoisie is to be measured by the altitude of its great intellects.. ~ Marx

Everyone who knows anything of history also knows that great social revolutions are impossible without the feminine ferment. Social progress may be measured precisely by the social position of the fair sex (plain ones included). ~ Marx on feminism.

“Today, the Marxist left tries to conceal these ugly facts, even while making political alliances with totalitarians overseas, in the hard-communist and Islamic nations. The hard-left also is today the major carrier of the virus of Jew-hatred, even if black racism has been fairly well eradicated in most of the USA and Europe.” source;

“What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.. Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man — and turns them into commodities. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange. The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.” Marx, The Jewish Question

“…the very cannibalism of the counterrevolution will convince the nations that there is only one way in which the murderous death agonies of the old society and the bloody birth throes of the new society can be shortened, simplified and concentrated, and that way is revolutionary terrorism.” Marx again

“We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.”  Marx and Engels

“Well, then, to carry out the principles of socialism do its believers advocate assassination and bloodshed? ‘No great movement,’ Karl [Marx] answered, ‘has ever been inaugurated Without Bloodshed.’” – interview with the Chicago Tribune, 1879.

I could go on but it’s all there.

The revolution never happened of course.

source: “What came to be informally known as “The Frankfurt School” of Critical Social Theory was originally established in Germany in 1923 as the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research…. The thinking of the Frankfurt School was heavily shaped by three key historical events: (1) the failure of the working-class revolution that Marx had predicted in Western Europe,… The theories of the Frankfurt School continue to inspire people both within and outside of academia.”

source: ” The term “Frankfurt school” is an informal term used to designate the thinkers affiliated with the Institute for Social Research or influenced by them; it is not the title of any institution, and the main thinkers of the Frankfurt school did not use the term to describe themselves….The nature of Marxism itself formed the second focus of the institute, and in this context the concept of critical theory originated…. [critiques] Although Frankfurt theorists delivered a number of criticisms against the theories and practices of their days, they did not present any positive alternatives.” That is the hallmark of critical theory, only to destroy. “Another criticism, originating from the left, is that critical theory is a form of bourgeois idealism that has no inherent relation to political practice and is totally isolated from any ongoing revolutionary movement.” Because it produces nothing.