The Sexual Revolution was for men

Yeah, how could anyone deny this? They were gaslighted by male psychopaths.

“You deserve to be used and discarded without the protection of marriage!”

“Consent is important …because you cannot prove a negative”

“Saying no is just your false consciousness talking, dignity and modesty is oppressing yourself”

Women work more hours per week than ever, earn less money, get less infrastructure, won’t get SS, their husbands might abandon them for a younger model, lower happiness rates, single motherhood is encouraged, STDs on the rise because “men” won’t wear a condom yeah you definitely won all the prizes… for fucking stupid.

-slow sarcastic clap-

They didn’t even win on the orgasm front.

ON THE ORGASM FRONT.

Women report less sexual satisfaction from

1 one night stands

2 circumcised men

3 being left wing

4 being unmarried to the partner

5 being on the Pill.

What did they win, again?

Herpes, HPV and cancer. You won HPV and actual cancer.

Observe the r-type quietly panic

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3022136/china-scientists-warn-global-cooling-trick-natures-sleeve
These people riot because of the slightest, dumbest shit.

You screwed.

“Lead scientist Dr Wu Jing, from the Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,”
Bullshit. The Russians were on this decades ago.
They’re really the Asian n—–rs, aren’t they? Always trying to steal shit. The rep is richly deserved. Other Asians call them this too, only the chinks.

“Nature, they warned, may trick us and might catch us totally unprepared – causing chaos, panic, famine and even wars as the global climate system is disrupted.”
Ah, see what they did? Well, we have to go to war and kill you all, because something something climate!
Conveniently kills off male mouths to feed.
Was aborting your daughters smart now?

Do you feel clever?

The planet doesn’t trick you, you had delusions of grandeur. Your rice farmers ancestors at least had food to eat. Marxists always deny the dumb was their fault. Get in the field and start planting comrade. Work or starve. The Bible is very clear.

They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for like the days of a tree shall the days of my people be, and my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands

anti-immigrant, anti-welfare, pro-work

K-select

Woe to you that join house to house and lay field to field, even to the end of the place: shall you alone dwell in the midst of the earth?”

urban planning is prohibited by the Bible and we all know God hates skyscrapers anyway

You’re anti-evolution by coddling the male population, that’s dysgenic:

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/02/07/post-war-population-recovery-genes/

The male gender role is intrasexual competition. Populations which despise their women DIE.

“The 2014 research, which drew on 5,000 years’ worth of data, suggested the current warm phase of the cycle could terminate over the next several decades, ushering in a 250-year cool phase, potentially leading to a partial slowdown in man-made global warming.”

They’re so arrogant they’ll think they can magic wand this with our technology.
Nope!
All populations will need to be self-sustained by their local environment i.e. their own continent. Nobody will be shipping outbound. If they tried cross-continent, it’ll be intercepted.
Malthus was right.

Well, this can never go horribly wrong.

They even fucked up warming conditions with multiple famines. Mao was in living memory. Your kid knowing Mandarin will be a flag for mockery after this SHTF, like Japanese is now.

“A sharp drop of temperature will benefit nobody. The biggest problem is, we know it will come, but we don’t know exactly when.”
Liars.

Even we’re storing.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/operation-chaos-whitehalls-secret-no-deal-brexit-plan-leaked-j6ntwvhll

China Shifts Purchase Priorities From Manufacturing Materials to Food…

“And now China’s biggest weakness starts to surface. A country that cannot feed its own population even during the best of times, is now facing a downturn in economic and employment activity while the need to import food remains”
GOOD.

R-selection ends in death every single time, it’s unavoidable. They’re overdue. It’s maths 101. Something like 1 in 4 people on the planet is Chinese. There are more of that one country than Africans, a whole race. Better they go in a famine than wiping out the few million whites responsible for our future. Fuck ’em. These people hate us. The baizuo thing was funny but still distinctly anti-white. Fuck ’em and their poison baby formula deliberately sold to white people.

They’ll remember.

This is what happens when you mess with the biggest food producers the world has ever known. You should be thanking the West.
This is what happens when you overpopulate your shitty mountainous country hoping to dispose of your excess males in a war.
This is what happens when you mess with a group with a higher IQ. Fake your transcripts all you want, the West’s native population is self-sustaining (part of our cultural individualism).
We rarely poison one another on purpose with cheap food either. They lack group loyalty if you look at their business practices screwing one another all the time, whites pull together when it counts.
Maybe instead of stealing American missile tech you should’ve told your women to shut their legs.
Keep pumping money into public pensions, I’m sure that’ll help.
This is what happens when you realise you pissed off your own continent and threatened all your neighbours with war, then suddenly need them.
Fuck you China, I hope Taiwan invades your corpse-strewn commie wreckage.
Christian murdering Marxist arseholes deserve to starve.

In reality, the ant kills the grasshopper for threatening their family.

Meanwhile, Poland’s IQ becomes evident as they FINALLY realise that growing warm weather fruit in a snowy country might be a stupid fucking idea.

Poland – Impact of weather conditions on fruit production


““We estimate that this year’s fruit harvest will be about 30 percent lower than in the previous year. Cherry harvest decreased the most – according to the Central Statistical Office, by 30 percent compared to last year. A significant decrease in yields concerns apples and pears,” says Załuska.”
Ya see that shiny ball in the sky? That’s called the SUN!
That determines what you’re allowed to grow!

It’s like if a Scottish person tried to grow tomatoes outdoors.

Unless I’m wrong and the climate of the planet is just randomly deciding to fuck with socialists and commies.

It’s only gonna get better, folks.

 

Mixed women just look higher sexed

worlds away from considerations of beauty, which, for women, involve a narrower than group average face – NOT broader, which is high T aka libido
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zhanavrangalova/2017/09/27/what-the-shape-of-your-face-says-about-your-sex-drive/#1efda635564f

Can we call this r-face?

R-types would logically have the sluttier face.

Past research has consistently found that men with shorter and wider faces are more aggressive, more prejudiced, more likely to deceive others, more dominant, and more driven to succeed compared to men with longer and narrower faces.

Low trust, sluttier, violent, compulsive lying – r-types in a nutshell.

This is even true for non-human primates, and among women this link is found for dominance, but not aggression. Furthermore, other people pick up on these facial cues, perceiving wide-faced men and women as more masculine, dominant and threatening.

R-selected women, more aggressive as sole protectors of their spawn.

It all FITS.

Why would all these personality traits be related to this seemingly random facial feature, also known as facial width-to-height ratio (FWHR)? Because they are all thought to be influenced, at least partly, by exposure to the masculinizing effects of testosterone. Although data are mixed as to the exact timing of this exposure (in utero, at puberty or in adulthood), more testosterone generally means higher behavioral masculinity, dominance, aggression and also a higher facial width-to-height ratio.

(polite coughing)

Examples of measurement of the FWHR in faces with relatively low and high FWHRs.

 FROM GENIOLE ET AL., 2015, PLOS ONE

Find the more attractive woman, I fucking dare you.

Also applies to retro women:

A long face is more attractive in women (read: feminine).
As history shows, feminine women like Vivien Leigh can have low testosterone but a fiiiiine sex life.
[despite gaslighting from a gay bitch of a husband]

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/04/140423101718.htm

Feminine face = better WHR measures, so best of both worlds, actually!

Wide hips – higher sex drive, partnered or not.

Long face in women is not horse face.

Except SJP but she isn’t white so… who cares?

Now, a set of two new Canadian studies find that FHWR is also linked to several aspects of people’s sexual psychology (sex drive, casual sex and infidelity), also known to be influenced by testosterone.

Water is wet, go on.

In the first study, 145 heterosexual Canadian students (52% female, 82% White, mean age = 22) currently in romantic relationships answered questions regarding their sex drive (like how often they experience sexual desire or how often they masturbate). They then had their face photos taken by the researchers (under identical distance, lighting, and backdrop conditions for all participants), and those photos were later carefully measured by two raters for width, height and some other facial features like cheekbone prominence.

Note: libido doesn’t equal promiscuity in women, which warrants separate study so hot does not equal slut. Discernment among the most attractive women in studies prove this (the sluttiest women are average or slightly above to hook more attractive mates). Yet it does explain partially why men would find certain women better options sexually if not marriage material (sexy over beauty). There’s a mutual exclusive at play here between availability (broad, manjaw) and beauty (dimorphic female, narrow face and soft jaw).

Because their average genes want to survive with anyone v no one.

And naturally propaganda and rhetoric factor below awareness.

This must change based on r/K cycling, what percentage of men find mannish women ‘hot’ rather than meh or repulsive (probably charts onto the man’s wing leaning too).

Could she be a porn star and how good (you imagine) at it? That’s sexy in our gross pornified culture and a 10 for Hotness.

Could she be portrayed as an ancient goddess in a sculpture? That’s beauty and a 10.

Beautiful, but by modern standards (which are dumb and/or anti-white, generally) – not hot.

sorry about the meme but you get the point

There’s a distinct look, defined or softer.

Like popular celebrities

Beautiful face + voluptuous body = Ideal.

By comparison, note how the limbs look thin? Odd side effect.

Shows natural fat % (so limbs must be less to be within range) but not obesity (female fat deposition, see WHR posts).

Rarely…. a woman is both.

QE-fightme-D:

Fuck you, Monica. Fuck you and your flawlessness.

The analyses confirmed the researchers’ hypothesis: Wider-faced men and women reported higher sex drive than their counterparts with narrower faces. This link remained even when other facial features were statistically controlled for.

A second sample of 314 students (57% female, 91% White, 93% heterosexual, mean age = 20) from a different Canadian university confirmed these findings regarding sex drive. This second study also asked participants about their desire for, attitudes towards and experiences with casual hookups and their expectations of future infidelity to a partner. The men with higher facial width-to-height ratios reported greater openness to hookups and a higher likelihood they’d be unfaithful to a partner compared to their narrow-faced peers. A link between FWHR and propensity for casual sex or infidelity was not found for the women in this sample.

potential

but libido finding is solid

Together with prior research on this facial feature, this study suggests that the facial width-to-height ratio, and our ability to perceive and interpret it, may be part of an evolved system that emerged long ago in our evolutionary past in order to help us figure out who may be dangerous vs. safe, trustworthy and faithful vs. likely to deceive or cheat on us, or more likely to stick around and raise babies vs. “hit it and quit it.”

Maybe r-oriented men don’t care if the woman is available to other men because, in times of r, any port in a storm, right?

R-selected men = low investment, might as well be low EFFORT.

Sorry but…. true, right?

Whites on average have the narrowest faces plus highest trust societies.

Japs are the closest non-whites. Says it all.

This is the first study to ever link FWHR to an aspect of human sexual psychology, so the findings need to be replicated in other samples and more diverse samples, including teens and older adults, non-whites, nonheterosexual and trans populations and using additional measures of sexual psychology before we can accept them.

Those studies can’t be published, you’ll kill them.

They’re in a drawer somewhere. PC people, you play yourself.

We should also remember that even if there is some positive correlation between FWHR and these personality and sexual traits, that this correlation is far from perfect. Not every person with a wide, short face is likely to be violent, cheat, hook up or crave sex several times a day. Being aware of our perceptual biases is an important first step in correcting our automatic tendency to stereotype someone based on the shape of their face.

Why did Marilyn make her face look broader with hair?

Video: Mass exodus of foreigners from China

I’ve also heard of people leaving Singapore and Chinese-infested parts of Australia, essentially kicked out by them. Little Chinas are growing everywhere. Vox Day has mentioned before how they’re crowding out white areas, taking up school places etc. Other Asians don’t seem to do this, with a few local exceptions.

Considering the Chinese expand into the West to report back to their Government (fact), this is disturbing, much like the Nazi invasion outpost on a British island.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_occupation_of_the_Channel_Islands

When the Russians did this infiltration of the West (especially America), there was outcry, it is invasion. I am disturbed there is nothing on this in the media, we’re supposed to think it’s normal because we can…. trust the Chinese. It is not. We can’t.

interesting reading

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/03/chinas-moon-landing-marks-growing-space-threat-britain-world/amp/

https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/huawei-zte%20investigative%20report%20(final).pdf

“Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party, experts explain, can exert influence over the corporate boards and management of private sector companies, either formally through personnel choices, or in more subtle ways.”

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/12/10/china-government-porn-ban-reward/

https://www.apnews.com/4a749a4211904784826b45e812cff4ca

“When Shan Junhua bought his white Tesla Model X, he knew it was a fast, beautiful car. What he didn’t know is that Tesla constantly sends information about the precise location of his car to the Chinese government.”

One of the many reasons I don’t trust Musk. Tesla would be rolling in his grave, if he had one.

https://www.nj.com/education/2018/11/profs_at_nj_college_satellite_campus_now_work_for.html

“Professors hired to work for a New Jersey college at its satellite campus in China have been told they are now effectively employees of the communist Chinese government, union leaders say.
Now, they will be employees of Wenzhou-Kean University, paid in Chinese currency and have been told they can no longer be in an American union.”

Invasion, blatant. Americans cannot be paid in dollars, working for an American college.

https://www.wsj.com/video/how-china-keeps-its-citizens-loyal-overseas/471BE85C-5AC2-4386-9EBA-697C8F5F4D56.html

It’s called Qiaowu and among other things, the Communist Party is funding its emigrants overseas.

https://www.economist.com/special-report/2018/05/17/why-many-rich-chinese-dont-live-in-china

https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2017/0414/Why-is-the-Chinese-government-encouraging-its-citizens-to-report-foreign-spies

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-population-idUSKCN1OZ08A
“China’s population is set to reach a peak of 1.442 billion in 2029 and start a long period of “unstoppable” decline in 2030″
R-types, famine.

It’s RIGHT THERE.

PEOPLE ALREADY KNOW.

Obviously, the late date is optimistic.

The weebs for China can say it’s my “opinion” all they like but Chinese isn’t a RACE and there’s demographic statistics!

Melanin is an aggression hormone

Not just a pigment. Biologists know this. It’s found in countless other species.
We even know the reputation of black birds with witchcraft and death.

“Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals?”
http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/articles/Rushton-Templer-pigmentation-aggression-sexuality.pdf

Remember the femme fatale is always black (haired*).

From the abstract:

“Both within human populations (e.g., siblings), and between populations (e.g., races, nations, states), studies find that darker pigmented people average higher levels of aggression and sexual activity (and also lower IQ).”

Yes, they look at IQ too.
It’s a reason Asians try to look paler (even the men).
The classic intellectual is pale. It’s status, it’s about money.
It’s also more ‘civilized’, as in less prone to criminality. This is key to collectivists, such as Asians.

*Historical references to black women e.g. Anne Boleyn, always referred to hair because black skinned people obviously didn’t naturally exist in Europe (they’d be referred to by geography, Moors are common descriptors). An African in Europe wouldn’t do well for many reasons including Vitamin D deficiency. Without imported sources, it can be fatal and the NHS guidelines do target Africans in Europe for warnings about this.
Italians were considered the most passionate women in the Middle Ages (and angry) due to their black hair, closely followed by dark-haired Irish women.
Spanish women were considered mongrels due to Islamic conquest, along with some Italians to this day. Northern Italians are what all Italians used to be, genetically.