Video: China’s golden age over

More like pyrite, mate. Shiny, shiny pyrite.

Communist countries always collapse eventually.

Watch the nomadic male r-types ready to jump ship as resources tank, it’s the canary.

All the weeb guys moving out of Singapore too, not so cocky now eh?

It’s like the smug girl who went to India once and won’t ever shut up about Asian supremacy like the secret to enlightenment is greasy food. Can we revoke their passports? Really, why not? If you claim East over West, surely that’s got to affect citizenship? It’s like they’ve got spy stamped on their forehead from the Communist boot they lick.

China has ripped off everyone, stolen science and precious technology for a war, but expects to command respect

and this guy is defending it?

https://www.amazon.com/China-Shrink-Cream-Pack-ounces/dp/B01HFKH0EQ/

I wonder if his waifu uses this for her social justice multicultural pegging session.

Race traitor, sex traitor, simple cuck? What is that? Would he answer either draft? Doubtful. That isn’t much of a man, nobody listens to these guys. The spate of mixed race divorces once their assets are confiscated for being a White Male* is gonna be amazing. Imagine the butthurt. They won’t blame their racial fetish and trusting their dick for solid financial advice, they’ll try to desperately blame all women.

*Look how many parasite single Chinese men there are, they’ll demand their equal share and it’ll be gone. A man’s duty is to provide but Communists extend that to society, to other male competition, this one of over a billion members… wow. They’ll be lucky if the Tiger Moms leave them with shoes after going through those divorce courts. They’re maternal as vultures over a carcass. Even reddit is picking up that Asian prostitution involves a wedding ceremony and lying about their politics, ambitions, notch count. This is precisely why the family had to approve of the male heir’s bride, it was an investment of the bloodline. Men following their dicks get divorced. White men have no family to protect them, utterly exposed. Asians exploit this.

Combined with the highest national population on the planet (most r-select, globally) it’s over.

India has a better shot, seriously. If they weren’t such arrogant Anglophiles I’d feel pity.

Plus their (Chinese) debt is worse than Japan, especially since national debt is calculated per citizen (real reason they dropped the baby limit). They’re still voting in huge pensions nobody can earn to pay in (and certain Asians are longer-lived, making it more insane from a mathematical standpoint). It’s a matter of time until bank runs and confiscations.

Culturally they want more of a nanny state (social credit recently) because yes, they aren’t as smart as their faked transcripts to get into Western universities. Make them serve prison time for the fraud and you’ll get smarter applicants.

Teaching your kid Mandarin is useless because they’re too racist against whites to ever accept you, it was so naive as to be funny (like Zuck telling kids to program and reduce his labour costs).

“It’s incredibly uncomfortable for foreigners to live here” he says blissfully entitled.

You don’t belong there. You never will. You’re as much an invader as Niqbal Amalleed off the boat going to Calais.

The impulse to migrate when things get a little difficult, no wonder the wife is Asian.

Couldn’t get a white woman (statistically, they’re less attractive, both parties). Why are weebs so weak? Just look at the passive dominance of the waifus. Girly men and manly women.

Wah, wah, they don’t like me here, wah, wah!

Toast, the hypocrisy makes them a laughing stock.

He doesn’t actually like the place he moved to and like all other outsiders will eventually leave once the native culture settles back.

Multiculturalism there seems to be failing because they think they don’t need you(r money) anymore.

The “growth” was either unfunded debt, Communist propaganda or propped-up Western money (mostly from ripping off America – their middle-class shrank as China’s grew).

If you don’t get this, you’re simply ignorant to the basic facts anyone could look up on these subjects.

They don’t like to collect race data in divorces now, it’s so bad.

If they included separations as well as divorce, it would skyrocket further.

Weaponized Asians

For the war, starts with psyops. Anti-white Asians.

http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?p=6029

Dehumanize before/during the mass slaughter.

The death squads gunning down white people would’ve started with the men so they couldn’t defend the women and children.

No prizes for guessing the race behind it (clue: the one that lies about its IQ in a sea of cheating scandals but fails to be basically competitive in STEM without plagiarism).

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-anti-white-racism.html

Maybe we need a coincidence detector for Asian names in SJW activism.

Remember, the fastest growing religion in Asia is Islam.

There’s billions of them (extremely r-selected) with birth rates increasing well past the domestic food supply (guarantees invasion of other nations at some point)..

And to prove it’s resources they want to take and not earn, they vote Left.

Collectivism isn’t a culture, it’s a genetic predisposition with a side effect of culture.

http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2894685

Update: see?

https://truepundit.com/feds-scramble-after-las-vegas-shooters-girlfriend-lists-fbi-as-place-of-employment-on-loan-application-she-might-have-been-an-asset/

Beware of Asian honeypots.

When they tell you there’s a higher IQ, they’re justifying a right to rule over you.

Sluts aren’t looking for better genes

People making things up from opinion on the internet

isn’t scientific.

Humans do dumb shit all the time. There isn’t a deep sciencey reason.

https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/16165

Evolved mate preferences define a central causal process in Darwin’s theory of sexual selection.

Their powerful influence has been documented in all well-studied sexually reproducing species, and is central to Sexual Strategies Theory (SST) as applied to humans.

Two sentences, totally different meanings.

This chapter takes stock of what is scientifically known about human mate preferences and their many behavioral manifestations. We discuss sex differences and sex similarities in the design features of human sexual psychology as they vary according to short-term and long-term mating temporal contexts. We review context-specific shifts in mating strategy depending on individual, social, and ecological qualities such as mate value, life history strategy, sex ratio, gender economic inequality, and cultural norms. For mate preferences to have evolved, they must be manifested in actual mating behavior in some individuals some of the time, such as those with high mate value in contexts where freedom of mate choice is permitted. We review the empirical evidence for the impact of mate preferences on actual mating decisions, as well as on tactics of mate attraction, tactics of mate retention, patterns of deception, causes of sexual regret, attraction to cues to sexual exploitability, attraction to cues to fertility, attraction to cues to resources and protection, derogation of competitors, causes of breakups, and patterns of remarriage.

The 60s was a mistake.

We conclude by articulating unresolved issues and offer a future agenda for the science of human mating. This agenda includes resolving key debates, such as competing evolutionary hypotheses about the functions of women’s short-term mating;

Why just women?
No wonder you don’t understand if you’re only studying half the equation.

The one time you can get away with that is if the topic is lesbians.

And it’s a cause/effect, chicken/egg issuue?

Are a group more likely to be r-types or can a group choose to act like r-types? Splitting it by sex rather than behaviour is a huge error.

how humans invent novel cultural technologies to better implement ancient sexual strategies;

There were never drug-resistant STDs before hookup apps.

and how cultural evolution may be dramatically influencing our evolved mating psychology.

Degeneration. The word you are looking for: degeneration.

Rolf Degen: “David Buss, pioneer of evolutionary psychology, acknowledges that women are probably not shopping for good genes when engaging in casual sex. He had been a co-founder of said hypothesis.”

Intellectual honesty, my stars.

The alpha genes thing is how male sluts try to rationalize superiority to female sluts.

“Somewhat mixed” no shit.

Small effect size in mating CHOICE = shit.

“no correlation” almost like women are loyal? Hormones don’t turn us into hookers?

The good study I saw was that women avoid strangers while ovulating aka the exact opposite of this BS.

“weak or mixed” with publication bias, non-existant

“questioned on theoretical grounds” it makes literally no sense, it’s an ego theory

“could be interpreted” should have been interpreted this entire time

Funnily, they’re hinting that women only behave badly when they think… like men.

But yes, women are the problem here.

also modern humans =/= ancient humans

“masculine and symmetrical features” those are opposites, symmetry is feminine

do a study on male beauty if you want to study …male beauty

Why would appearance = good genes? You’re so vain…. I bet you think these genes are about you. You’re so vain…

no evidence that slutty* women elevate the importance of intelligence at ovulation

Not the whole group. Words have meanings, what you mean is different than what you write. Assumptions make an ass.

I don’t get to say men are rapists…, it lacks clarity, I would begin the sentence, rapist men… that’s the smaller group I discuss.

“questionable theoretically” we know it’s shit but we need money and “not well supported empirically”

An appeal to please stop lying because it makes people link your studies on forums for confirmation bias.

A dudebro down the gym is not improving his genes. Basic biology.
They would value intelligence but they don’t have much.

Millennials suck because society is dying

https://henrydampier.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/why-millenials-are-garbage/

  • Low trust society
  • Shit parenting
  • No standards

I don’t think Gen Z will save the world though. That’s equally silly.

I think it’ll be a combination of Z with Y leadership.

The cancer is entitlement. It kills every civilization starting with its civility (trust, unity).

Homosexuality may be developmental error

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/12/homosexuality-may-start-womb
They’re claiming 8% of the population now, the number keeps going up!

“Although epigenetic changes are usually temporary, they involve alterations in the proteins that bind together the long strands of DNA. Thus, they can sometimes be handed down to offspring. According to the hypothesis, homosexuality may be a carry-over from one’s parents’ own prenatal resistance to the hormones of the opposite sex.”

Explains Goethe.

Great man, unusual number of homosexual offspring.

“The initial benefit to the parents may explain why the trait of homosexuality persists throughout evolution, he says.”

Evolution presumes the fit ones will breed more (reducing the downside loss to zero as 52:48 female to male birth ratio) and there’s no parasitism between high and low fitness.
There are other studies along these lines e.g. a review

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296090/
“More recent research suggests that 2-6% of men in the United States, France and Great Britain have had homosexual experience”

It’s always the men being the most degenerate, generic finding of sexology.
And they wonder why they die sooner.

Big winners, bigger losers.

“This article reviews the evidence regarding prenatal influences of gonadal steroids on human sexual orientation, as well as sex-typed childhood behaviors that predict subsequent sexual orientation.”

But it doesn’t work the other way around, parent forcing a Barbie on your son.
And it isn’t 1:1, kids will play with most things if allowed.

“The evidence supports a role for prenatal testosterone exposure in the development of sex-typed interests in childhood, as well as in sexual orientation in later life, at least for some individuals.”

Yay, we can blame men! – feminists, if they had any balls

“It appears, however, that other factors,”

Pathogens.

in addition to hormones, play an important role in determining sexual orientation.”

Pathogens.

“These factors have not been well-characterized,”

Pathogens, billions of pathogens.

“but possibilities include direct genetic effects, and effects of maternal factors during pregnancy. “

You can try blaming the woman but you’d be wrong. If women were responsible, nobody would be straight because everyone has a mother, and therefore a cause. We wrongly assume anything “wrong” with a baby is the mother’s fault. This is like blaming your food poisoning on the oven rather than the handling before that stage (paternal factors, research the other half too, paternal factors!) or once it comes out.

Paternal degeneracy would be an interesting factor. A very interesting factor.
Are promiscuous men* likelier to have gay sons, easy observational study.

You’d essentially be testing for r-selection. Homosexual men are extreme sexual r-types: high volume, low discrimination, nomadic patterning…

“Although a role for hormones during early development has been established, it also appears that there may be multiple pathways to a given sexual orientation outcome and some of these pathways may not involve hormones.”

….Pathogens?

Where’s the science, right?

How would it occur from father to germline like an STD, mother to child or both?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertically_transmitted_infection

Have we seen pathogens change things about babies in other cases?

http://www.dw.com/en/five-pathogens-that-can-harm-an-unborn-child/a-19014487

Wouldn’t there be a genetic brake on that?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21767812

A gene that can be compromised in mothers and lead to increased infection risk for the infant. Too little compromise and the mother suffers from carrying the foetus.

Start with the pathogens it encourages?

But where’s the science, I know, I know…

If only we had a clear-cut sign of societal sexual selection.
Say, weaker men sexually preferring masculinized women.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women-muscles-attraction-more-thin-bodies-image-study-men-a8179481.html

That’ll do.

Should women be uber-feminine then? No, older women are hormonally and it causes pregnancy failure.

http://home.bt.com/news/science-news/male-sex-hormones-help-towards-a-successful-pregnancy-11364036745307

*we know there’s already a link with mothers, fathers constantly go under-studied, especially in terms of promiscuity outcomes.

https://www.livescience.com/7056-mom-genetics-produce-gay-sons.html