win stupid prizes.
The West is still paying to embarrass itself
R-selection continues, pedophilia being normalised as all the “crazies” warned us
win stupid prizes.
The West is still paying to embarrass itself
R-selection continues, pedophilia being normalised as all the “crazies” warned us
Mini post. Kinda. Why is Benedict Cumberbatch so ugly?
No really. If we’re doing red pill observations, humour me.
I mentioned before about old world superstitions forgotten in recent years.
As recently as my parent’s generation, they considered ugly children the product of sin, that God was punishing their parents for their sin. You can still find this info around if you look but they rarely dive into it.
You could say it’s about STDs but back then people rarely travelled and slept around enough to frequently catch them. The modern microbiome of the slut is more taxed. So what?
Back to the school mocking. If a child had always married parents but became ugly in the teens, questions would be asked openly and they would get teased about whether one or both parents had ever cheated. This is where we get the term bastard. It isn’t actually about bastards, it’s about ugliness. The ugliness of parental deceit.
You can pretty much tell when there’s a birth defect in a baby, the eyes look dull if it’s mental. It’s a known indicator of fatal defects.
2015 Birth Defects in the Newborn Population: Race and Ethnicity
Overall birth defect prevalence was 29.2 per 1000 in a cohort of 1,048,252 live births, of which 51% were Caucasians.
Full white or mongrelised? Let’s assume pureblood despite America (mixed white, mostly). American whites are on average less attractive as white blended than single nation counterparts, even living in America. Models tend to come from homogeneous national areas, (i.e. subrace) a finding that is known to apply to white settlers in Brazil to this day, they send scouts. Specifically.
Compared with Caucasians, the risk of overall birth defects was lower in African–Americans (relative risk = 0.9, confidence interval 0.8–0.9) and Hispanics (relative risk = 0.9, confidence interval 0.8–0.9).
Failure to consider abortions for “no” reason or gender as defective. Selection bias. A lot of those already had abortions because they’re high abortion groups!
The risk of overall birth defects was similar in Caucasians and Asians. Relative to the Caucasians, African–Americans had a lower risk of cardiac, genitourinary, and craniofacial malformations but a higher risk of musculoskeletal malformations. Hispanics had a lower risk of genitourinary and gastrointestinal malformation. Asians had a higher risk of craniofacial and musculoskeletal malformations.
Didn’t control for proportion in the population, then non-whites are way ahead.
Craniofacial = ugly.
Musculoskeletal = ugly. Well, dumpy.
Unless you’re going to argue a big is beautiful for literal birth defects?
And “similar” isn’t same. It isn’t statistical. This is like IVF success studies again (see below).
Why did some old world men witness the birth? All babies look like those reddish potatoes, it can’t be a resemblance. You can tell a resemblance to one parent over another by middle childhood to puberty.
We’re told that it’s about adultery and it might be true if you suspect a man with certain features e.g. skin colour, an extra finger.
Yet, what can you tell at birth? Ugliness.
Whether or not the man in question remembers that reason.
Cinderella effect also applies to genetic but ugly kids (lookism, it’s aka). The parents reject them, even if one genetically caused their fug.
Take Cumberbatch, product of a union involving adultery.
Fugly. Nice voice, but his father is the looker. Mother is a looker too. The issue cannot be genetic.
Some superstitions have a basis in fact.
Why did old ladies peer into a pram to judge the ugliness of the babe?
To see if you’re a SINNER!
[inc Thou shalt not adulterate]
Picking on an ugly white guy wouldn’t be totally kosher. I have other evidence.
We’re looking for spiteful mutants.
Now the post gets huge.
To more data, ever more data, smother the liars in data:
“Please may I request the following information, records and documentation under the Freedom of Information Act:
Information in regard to people of mixed race parentage- often called ‘white and black Caribbean’, ‘white and black African’, ‘white and Asian’, ‘other mixed’- being at increased risk of being born with a birth defect, stillborn, or of suffering from fertility problems in their adult lives, which is related to their mixed race parentage
Information regarding NHS policy and practice on the advising of interracial couples, who are prospective parents, about the increased risk of their child being born with a birth defect, stillborn, or infertile in adult life, which would be connected to their, the child’s, mixed race parentage
Please may I also request statistical information and records which display the following:
The percentage of overall cases of babies born with a birth defect, which is attributable to each ethnic group
The percentage of overall cases of babies still born, which is attributable to each ethnic group
The percentage of overall cases of infertility, which is attributable to each ethnic group
The percentage of overall births, which is attributable to each ethnic group”
“In Tables 8 and 10, mixed race is included in a single category of Mixed, Chinese and any other ethnic group. This is because the numbers in these groups are sufficiently low to risk being disclosive, and follows agreed statistical guidelines.
a) being born with a birth defect – this information is shown in Table 10.
b) being still born – this information is not published. However, you could request a special extract (further details of how to do this are explained below).
c) we do not hold any information on infertility, and are therefore not able to answer your question about adults suffering from fertility problems, connected to their mixed race parentage.”
Do not hold information my lily-white arse.
“Page does not exist”.
“Some research suggests that Black and Asian women have shorter gestation than White European women, and that this may be due to earlier fetal maturation (Patel et al., 2004). The discrepancies in gestation by ethnicity may also be explained by socio-economic, behavioural and physiological differences among the different ethnic groups (Gray et al., 2009).”
In an ONS report. They know.
“Table 10 (184.5 Kb Excel sheet) shows that for four of the five combined ethnic groups analysed, the most common cause of infant death was immaturity related conditions
Mixed, Chinese and any other group, 44%;
For a majority, that’s incredibly low.
and those where ethnicity was
not stated, 49%).
For the Asian group, the most common cause was congenital anomalies (41%). A higher incidence of congenital anomalies in Asian populations is well-documented (Gray et al. 2009).”
“Low birthweight and prematurity are both measures of fetal development. Another measure is the baby’s size in relation to its gestational age. Babies whose birthweight lies below the tenth percentile for their gestational age are known as ‘small for gestational age’ (SGA).
Not all babies who are SGA have a pathological growth restriction; they may just be constitutionally small.
This may explain why babies of Bangladeshi, Indian or Pakistani origin are more likely to be SGA than White British babies.”
Smaller brains too. Inbreeding depression but also group average by nation. Look at national IQ.
Over one whole standard deviation below. According to the likes of Peterson, useless to a Western economy. The average Bangladeshi.
Recall regression to the mean. Also, friendliness correlates more to low IQ. Do not be fooled.
Jamaica 71, where we’re picking up new NHS nurses.
Enjoy that decline.
Tables 8 and 10 mentioned in FOI request not listed, have to know it’s there.
Under Downloadable Tables:
“Table 8: Live births, neonatal and infant mortality by ethnic group and gestational age at birth, 2012 birth cohort, England and Wales
Table 10: Infant mortality by ONS cause groups and broad ethnic group, 2012 birth cohort, England and Wales”
For future reference, write your FOI requests as “concern for services provided to BAME women” and “progressive need for up-to-date medical guidance for mixed race couples and the biracial in family planning”.
You have to download the excel, click to tables 8 and 10, then read the footnote of superscript 1 to know to scroll right.
Table 8: All others^1
7.1% under 37wks
Black SGA: 9.2 and 12.3%.
Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani only SGA: 17%, 16.3%, 14.2%.
White SGA: 7.2%, 6.2%.
ALL SGA average: 8.2%.
Pre-term neonatal deaths
B,I,P: 9, 30, 47
Black: 39, 13
White: 549, 63
Unknown, not stated: 32
All others^1: 87
For such a vanishingly small percentage of the population, how is it 87?
10% of pre-term deaths were “1 Chinese, Other Asian, Other black, Other and all Mixed groups.”
Do you see what I see?
For non-statistically minded people:
Infant death, pre-term
Black African: 62
Black Caribbean: 20
W native 750
W other 86
Not stated 48
All others^1: 138
See it yet? If you controlled for population ratio, it’d be more dramatic by far.
This is why they hide it and I have to make my own charts.
Term infant deaths
All others^1: 102.
That’s 11.4% from a tiny group of mixed.
Table 10 screen-capped, do your own charts.
Related studies, I do have a point about measurement error.
2009 Fertility by ethnic and religious groups in the UK, trends in a multi-cultural context
Asian tsunami in USA too
From one of the links, can’t find which. Calm down. Either they’re abstaining from having kids once here, infertile, the neonate dies or it’s retarded. Being here is actually a curse since they’re held to the standards and economy of a higher IQ nation. They’re voter birds here for a season or tax chattel and they’ll leave when it’s convenient to.
“How a patient’s ethnic background affects her chance of pregnancy, especially with IVF, is a fascinating yet poorly studied area of research. According to a 1995 national survey of family growth, non-Caucasian married women were more likely to experience infertility than Caucasian married women, yet these same non-Caucasian women were less likely to receive any type of infertility treatment—especially treatment with assisted reproductive technologies.
There is very little data in the literature examining ethnicity and its affect upon pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Ethnic minorities compose a small percentage of patients in the nation’s IVF programs, making it relatively difficult to examine how they respond to various infertility treatments. In the few studies that have examined the affect of ethnicity on IVF pregnancy rates, differing outcomes have been found.
There have been only a few studies specifically comparing IVF success rates between African Americans and Caucasians. The results of two of these studies contradict each other, with one showing that African Americans had decreased pregnancy rates with IVF as compared to Caucasians, and the other finding no difference in pregnancy outcomes with IVF between these two ethnic groups.
Likewise, there are only a few studies directly comparing IVF pregnancy outcomes between Indians and Caucasians. One shows a trend towards decreased pregnancy rates in Indian women and finds that Indian women were significantly more likely to have their cycle cancelled as compared to Caucasian women. In comparison, another study found no significant difference in IVF pregnancy rates between Indians and Caucasians. A more recent study has shown that Asian ethnicity was an independent predictor of poor outcome with IVF. There have been no studies examining IVF pregnancy outcomes in Hispanics in comparison to any other ethnic groups.
We’ll see why.
When I was in training, I published the first study comparing IVF outcomes among multiple ethnic groups. It was a retrospective study utilizing a data set that was the result of the collaboration between three IVF centers in the Boston area: Boston IVF, Brigham and Women’s Hospital IVF Center, and Reproductive Science Center.
We retrospectively reviewed the cycles of 1,135 women undergoing IVF between 1994 and 1998. Only the first IVF cycle for each couple was reviewed. Ethnicity was self-reported. Women who categorized themselves as having a mixed ethnic background were excluded.
Seriously. Measurement bias much?
….In order to better understand how ethnicity affects IVF outcome, it will be necessary to study a larger number of minority patients. In these studies, it is important that all ethnicities be included. If racial differences do exist, IVF treatment protocols could be adjusted to improve the success rates for patients of all ethnic backgrounds. Therefore, further exploration in this area is necessary and very important.”
We did that.
“After adjusting for certain factors including the age of the patient at time of treatment, cause of female or male infertility, and type of treatment (ICSI vs IVF), the study found that White Irish, South Asian Indian, South Asian Bangladeshi, South Asian Pakistani, Black African, and Other Asian women had a significantly lower odds of a live birth than White British women. For example, the live birth rate for White British women was 26.4% compared to 17.2% for White Irish women and 17.4% for Black African women.
The study also found that some groups of women including South Asian Bangladeshi, Black African, Middle Eastern, have a significantly lower number of eggs collected than White British women.
Moreover, South Asian Indian, South Asian Bangladeshi, South Asian Pakistani, Black British, Black African, Black Caribbean and Middle Eastern women were at a higher risk of not reaching the embryo transfer stage.
The paper explores the possible reasons behind the variation and states that while genetic background could be a potential determinant of egg and sperm quality, variation in environmental exposures relating to lifestyle, dietary factors, socio-economic and cultural factors could be influencing egg and sperm quality, accessibility of fertility treatment and behaviour towards seeking medical care and consequently reproductive outcomes.
No, they were living in the same place. Muh Magic Dirt.
Genetics is the ONLY difference now.
You have NOTHING.
DNA causes germline DNA, really? Maybe?
Furthermore, the increased prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in South Asian women may have an impact on egg quality and lower implantation rates.
Shit tier WHR tipped us off on that one, see end.
Dr Kanna Jayaprakasan, Consultant subspecialist in Reproductive Medicine, Derby Fertility Unit, Royal Derby Hospital; Honorary Associate Professor in Gynaecology, University of Nottingham and senior author of the paper, said:
“The data suggests that ethnicity is a major independent factor determining the chances of IVF or ICSI treatment success.
“While the reason for this association is difficult to explain, the potential factors could be the observed differences in cause of infertility, ovarian response, fertilisation rates and implantation rates, which are all independent predictors of IVF success.
“The main strengths of the study are the use of the UK HFEA national database which includes a large number of women treated in all UK units. However, the numbers in some of the sub-ethnic minorities, such as Bangladeshi women, were low in the study.”
Professor Adam Balen, spokesperson for the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and Chair of the British Fertility Society (BFS) said:
“Infertility affects 10-15% of the population and more people are seeking fertility treatment.
“This interesting study looking at maternal ethnicity provides useful data based on a large number of women undergoing fertility treatment. The reasons behind the variation need to be looked at in more detail but in the future could potentially help improve success rates amongst all groups of women.”
“Black and South Asian women were found to have lower live birth rates compared with White women”
“Black and South Asian women seem to have the poorest outcome, which is not explained by the commonly known confounders. Future research needs to investigate the possible explanations for this difference and improve IVF outcome for all women.”
Almost like Anglo women evolved to breed in the Anglo climate?
The Ice Age killed the boyish ones.
“Variation in risk factors and outcomes was found in infants of White mothers by paternal race/ethnicity.”
I wonder which way.
Inbreeding or outbreeding depression?
“Status exchange hypothesizes that in a marriage market framework, minority men marry less-desired White women (e.g., of lower education) in exchange for higher social status. The second hypothesis, in-group preference, simply suggests that people prefer members from their own group, and thus, intermarriage is the less desirable scenario.”
Dudebros like “where’s da studies?”
I’m like “Have you even looked?”
“Together they found that mixed-race couples differed significantly with respect to their sociodemographic characteristics from the endogamous couples. After control for those variables, biracial infants were found to have worse birth outcomes than infants with 2 White parents but better than infants with 2 Black parents.6,8–12 (Henceforth, infant’s race/ethnicity will be referred to by the notation “maternal race/ethnicity–paternal race/ethnicity” [e.g., White–Black].)”
DING DING DING DING DING
TIL Wombs iz white supremacist.
“Consistent with Table 1, infants in the White–unreported group had the worst birth outcomes in each category.”
Trans. mixed. Likely Asian since S. America and Black are already covered.
Learn to read, weebs.
“In general, I found substantial variation in birth outcomes within the group of infants with White mothers and fathers of different racial/ethnic groups. This is interesting because it shows that the common practice of using maternal race/ethnicity to refer to the infant’s race/ethnicity, regardless of father’s race/ethnicity, can be problematic.
aka nice way of calling out deception
For example, it is not uncommon for a study to refer to infants of White mothers as “White infants,” even though “White infants” may imply that the fathers are White. In this study, I demonstrated that infants of a White mother and a White father, the real “White infants,” have the better birth outcomes than do those infants of a White mother and a non-White father. Therefore, the practice of using “White mother” to refer to White infants will yield lower estimation of the birth outcomes because there are infants of non-White fathers in the sample.”
They know. It’s a cover-up.
Category errors galore.
“The infants in the White–White group had the most-advantaged birth outcomes, followed by infants in the 3 Hispanic-father groups. Infants in the White–Black group had the second-most-disadvantaged birth outcomes; the differences in birth outcomes between White–Black and White–White infants were statistically significant: White–White infants had a 2% (70 g) higher average birthweight, 26% lower LBW rate (4.64% vs 6.26%), and 39% lower infant mortality rate (0.43% vs 0.71%) than did White–Black infants. Infants in the White–unknown group had the most-disadvantaged outcomes in each category. These heterogeneities within White mothers show that the common practice of using maternal race/ethnicity to refer to the race/ethnicity of the infant is problematic: White–White infants had the best birth outcomes among the groups studied, so any other paternal race/ethnicity pulls down the averages for all White mothers. That is, the birth outcomes of White–White infants are actually underestimated by researchers who use mothers’ race/ethnicity to refer to infants’ race/ethnicity, and thus, the racial/ethnic disparities between White and any other race/ethnicity may be underestimated accordingly as well.”
“…Clearly, the unreported father is a proxy for more-noteworthy factors, because if unreported fathers were merely missing from certificates, their infants’ outcomes should not be so much worse.”
What DO these studies have in common? [Asians]
Could also be child of rape as a confound.
2012 Biracial couples and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
“Biracial status of parents was associated with higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes than both White parents but lower than both Black parents, with maternal race having a greater influence than paternal race on pregnancy outcomes.”
Evolution is racist or instincts evolved for reasons? Pick ONE.
Your Third World surrogate plan may need retouching.
If it fails or dies or gets retarded, you still gotta pay up! What are the odds?
Why is it so hard to find studies about the most populous race on the planet?
What is associated with IQ and other development issues? Pre-term birth.
“Maternal age, education level, race and ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy, and parity were significant risk factors associated with PTB.”
It’s mentioned along with smoking.
“…The analysis of interactions between maternal characteristics and perinatal health behaviors showed that Asian women have the highest prevalence of PTB in the youngest age group (< 20 years; AOR, 1.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-1.54).”
I want more studies about them. I’m not scared of reality.
That suggests a genetic predisposition to be present so young. I’d compare PTB to WHR, personally.
“Pacific Islander, American Indian, and African American women ≥40 years of age had a greater than two-fold increase in the prevalence of PTB compared with women in the 20-24 year age group.”
Their own women.
Pre-term study and IQ:
“RESULTS: Across all assessments, VP/VLBW individuals had significantly lower IQ scores than term-born controls, even when individuals with severe cognitive impairment (n = 69) were excluded. IQ scores were found to be more stable over time for VP/VLBW than term-born individuals, yet differences in stability disappeared when individuals with cognitive impairment were excluded. Adult IQ could be predicted with fair certainty (r > 0.50) from age 20 months onward for the whole VP/VLBW sample (n = 260) and from 6 years onward for term-born individuals (n = 229).
CONCLUSIONS: VP/VLBW individuals more often suffer from cognitive problems across childhood into adulthood and these problems are relatively stable from early childhood onward. VP/VLBW children’s risk for cognitive problems can be reliably diagnosed at the age of 20 months. These findings provide strong support for the timing of cognitive follow-up at age 2 years to plan special support services for children with cognitive problems.”
So it doesn’t cause but it is associated. Humans evolved long gestation for the brain.
Clear defect evidence in the genes- study it!
But surely, you say, genetic issues would be also hormonal (hormones regulate genes as well) and apply to men?
Yes. Yes it would.
“A total of 9079 patients were reviewed, of which 3956 patients had complete data. Of these, 839 (21.2%) were azoospermic. After adjusting for age, African-Canadians (odds ratio [OR] 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.25) and Asians (1.34; 95% CI 1.11-1.62) were more likely to be azoospermic compared to Caucasians.”
Some of us form opinions AFTER reading.
White men are literally more fertile and most fertile with white women.
“Similarly, African Canadians (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.33-2.29) were more likely to be oligospermic and Asians (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.97) less likely to be oligospermic. Low volume was found in African-Canadian (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.05-1.91), Asians (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01-1.51), and Indo-Canadians (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.01-2.13). Furthermore, Asians (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.93) and Hispanics (OR 0.58; 95% CI 034-0.99) were less likely to have asthenospermia. Asians (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.94) and Indo-Canadians (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35-0.99) were less likely to have teratozospermia. No differences were seen for vitality. No differences were seen for FSH levels, however, Asians (p<0.01) and Indo-Canadians (p<0.01) were more likely to have lower testosterone.”
It’s always the damn Asians.
Magic Dirt won’t fix your shitty sperm.
Maybe if we spend more on the NHS! The evolution fairy may visit!
The lower sexual dimorphism of Asians makes them functionally partially infertile. This is why they marry so young (it isn’t traditionalism) and despite this, have a low birth count per person, and are the most populous race on Earth. They’re actually the most r-selected, Mother Nature holds them back from fertilization with mutations. Along with r-selection, more total fertility issues in the male/offspring (azoospermia, infant death), lower volume AND lower testosterone, it all fits!
Is that my fault? No. Stop blaming me for reading. I’m not, in fact, God.
Hey, we have our own group with shitty sperm. Theirs is just bigger and more characteristic of the whole.
“AR-CAG repeat length was longer in infertile men in Asian, Caucasian, and mixed races (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.43, P <0.01; SMD = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.25, P <0.05; SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.15-0.63, P <0.01).
Notice p-value difference is so loose for white it doesn’t meet the medical standard? 0.05 is too high. Absurdly.
The overall study shows that increased AR-CAG repeat length was associated with male infertility. The subgroup study on races shows that increased AR-CAG repeat length was associated with male infertility in Asian, Caucasian, and mixed races. Increased AR-CAG repeat length was also associated with azoospermia. This meta-analysis supports that increased androgen receptor CAG length is capable of causing male infertility susceptibility.”
In the interest of intellectual honesty.
We literally have the studies. e.g. It’s metabolic.
“Sixty-four PCOS patients and 40 women served as the control group were studied. The two groups were subdivided according to the body mass index (BMI) into two obese and non-obese groups. Waist:hip ratio (WHR), plasma epinephrine level was estimated, sympathetic skin response (SSR); postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, heart rate variability (HRV), and valsalva ratio were measured in both groups.”
“Compared to the control group, obese PCOS patients demonstrated higher BMI and WHR, reduced palmar SSR latency and higher amplitude, altered HRV, higher plasma epinephrine level, and rapid pulse rate. Moreover, non-obese patients show reduced palmar SSR latency and higher amplitude, higher plasma epinephrine level, and higher pulse rate. BMI and WHR of the patients were positively correlated with plasma epinephrine level; while the HRV was negatively correlated WHR.”
“The BMI and WHR were significantly higher in the PCOS patients compared to the control group 36.63±4.23 kg/m2 vs. 34.14±3.39 kg/m2 (p=0.041) and 0.88±0.05 compared to 0.79±0.11 (p=0.001), respectively.”
“We demonstrated high plasma epinephrine level during lying and standing positions in PCOS patients. This could be of obesogenic origin as we noticed a positive correlation between plasma epinephrine level and both of BMI and WHR. PCOS patients of this study exhibited central abdominal obesity and the mechanisms by which central obesity drive an increase in sympathetic activity are not entirely clear. Yet, the fat cells have increased sensitivity to lipolytic agents and/or the factors inducing fat mobilization are turned on (16). This was further supported that adipocytes isolated from the visceral fat depot of women with PCOS had increased catecholamine-stimulated lipolysis (17).”
Nice boy hips. Don’t try for kids. (Goes for all races, Spartans forced girls to be lightly athletic to be ready for childbirth as a woman, that broadens hips beyond racial average).
And when the NHS totally fails, picture the fatal correction to reality when these women expect childbirth interventions. No waist? No taste.
It’s genetic. They’re gonna get fat – or the kids will. We’ve all seen them. I’m just saying, the signs were there. Choosing a woman with a shit tier WHR is like electing for a manlet over the average height. It could rarely work out for health, but rarely. Don’t get angry at me.
“RESULTS: Women with WHR ≥0.8 had higher concentration of glucose and insulin (both fasting and after 120 min of oral administration of 75 g glucose), as well as HOMA-IR value, than women with WHR value < 0.8. Also, abdominal obesity disorders hormonal parameters. Higher free androgen index and lower concentration of sex hormone binding globulin and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate were found in female with WHR ≥ 0.8.
There’ll still be guys like “WHR doesn’t matter, medically”.
Muh dudebros going, “at least they’re skinny”. But they’re not?
“Women with WHR ≥0.8 had… abdominal obesity disorders hormonal parameters.”
They’re literally not. Chemically. You can biopsy the tissue and test it.
“the fat cells have increased sensitivity to lipolytic agents and/or the factors inducing fat mobilization are turned on”
My feels have zero to do with that, dude. It’s genes?
NOBODY is jealous. You keep your secret fatty.
I implore you to marry the future whale and learn the hard way. They’re a puffer-fish.
Whatever their race. But the shorter they are, the worse it is. Short women should have an even SMALLER waist, since it’s skeletal. My own is far smaller than most Asians, for instance, despite being taller than most of them as white. If you want to piss them off, say (honestly) that men like small waists. Just generally. Gets them every time, although most people wouldn’t say they had a large one (not really looking and they don’t dress for it). They know they’re broad and they hate women who dress to show any different, including lucky exceptions in their own race, since it’s a countersignal. Namely: I can afford to have a smaller midsection, less running and foraging is required.
[If I want to dress to piss off a group of women, bodycon but for the waist only. It’s subtle and you’d imagine as a man they would neither notice nor care. Great way to tell a woman’s natural WHR – do they like bodycon? It needn’t be tight on T&A, actually that’s better, it’s actually about waist fit. Pill women also get larger round the middle, any weight gain is there and ruins WHR so it’s visual slut shaming too. Love it.]
Follicular stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, androstenedione, and 17-beta-estradiol, were on similar level in both groups. Elevation in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein levels, as well as decrease in high density lipoprotein level in serum of women with WHR value ≥0.8, were found when compared to women with WHR < 0.8. A statistically significant correlation was found between WHR value and glucose, insulin, sex hormone binding globulin, free androgen index and lipid profile parameters.”
Hips don’t lie because biochemistry.
“CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal obesity causes additional disorders in metabolic and hormonal parameters in PCOS women, which confirmed changes in analyzed parameters between PCOS women with WHR < 0.8 and WHR ≥ 0.8 and statistically significant correlations between WHR value and analyzed parameters.”
An honor culture can only function in a society in which there is a shared code — clear rules, standards, and expectations for interaction and engagement — and within a closed community of equals. But as the Roman Republic transformed into a sprawling, porous, far-flung empire, its society became increasingly large, complex, and diverse, and “The citizen of Rome became a citizen of the world,” this common, level playing field disintegrated.
In an honor culture, you can only be insulted by someone you consider an equal. But in Roman society, discerning who deserved this level of respect, and whose slights to take seriously, became increasing difficult and unclear. If someone possessed a different set of values, was a citizen still honor-bound to care what they thought?
Early Romans had shared rules of engagement — boundaries that checked their competitions and kept them civil. In the greater chaos of the empire, in the absence of shared norms, citizens made the rules up as they went. It was every man for himself. In fact, the less a man cared about honor, the more unable he was to be shamed, the more strategic advantage he gained. Early Romans had not played to win, but for the sake of engaging in a good fight; now, citizens were prepared to win at any cost.
the noble loser
political gain > spiritual
Romans thus came to see contests as unequal and destructive. Those who engaged in competitions under the old assumption of participating on a level playing field, found instead that the odds were stacked, and this gap between expectation and reality engendered great bitterness. As did the fact that it seemed more and more men began receiving commendations, laurels of honor, who hadn’t actually earned them.
no meritocracy or scant
As a result, Romans became disillusioned and began to withdraw from the contest, from active engagement with their fellow citizens and civic life. “When competition was insupportable, then paralysis, the desire to hide, and the desire to be insensitive and autonomous became widespread cultural phenomena. With the loss of the good contest and the rules that framed it, cold, callous, brazen shamelessness became a cure for shame.”
hopelesssness (a sin if you check with Catholics, despair)
“individualism” ego rationalisation, vanity (good for self and appearance’s sake, not for thede)
“Shamelessness” for the Romans did not necessarily mean, as it does for us, to be unvirtuous, but rather to literally be incapable of being shamed. That is, the shameless care nothing for what others think of them.
spiritually vapid celebrities or role models
It always starts with the men doesn’t it?
Weak personal morals/actions of men, appeal to exception and excuses, weak moral authority > no honour > loss of respect to other men and all women, no social power, nobody listens. The levy breaks, the dam bursts. “If it’s okay when they do, why not me?” Monkey see, monkey do. Children don’t listen what you say, they witness you.
A hierarchy of modern men would rank far below late Romans, but how often do they virtue signal against men who’d at least risked death in battle? Like, STFU. They could build houses and fires. They were useful. Women hate gammas for the fake signals like that. The snarky “I’m so much better” – then DO something, DO anything useful!
Fathers should stick around to tell their sons this, it isn’t women’s business and we resent this novel pressure to kinda ‘mansplain’ to boys what they should already know as adults – STANDARDS.
Women who complain about the manchild are 100% right, there shouldn’t be a word! Nor mantrum! We shouldn’t understand what it means nor see it!
While today we tend to admire this kind of radical indifference to public opinion, to the Romans unbounded autonomy was the mark of a man whose energy had been drained, whose being had been destroyed;
libertarians are lazy, in practice
excuses to do less, altogether
as Cicero put it: “To take no heed of what other people think of you is the part not only of an arrogant man but, to be sure, of a dissolutus.” How could someone who remained unmoved even in the face of legitimate criticism, who refused to be ashamed even when confronted with their culpability, ever be trusted?
the shameless man, the attention-seeking psychopaths as role models based on short-term results
high time pref parasitism on society
[see Hare’s work]
Still, even Cicero, though himself a political leader, was sympathetic to the impulse to become callously disengaged, rhetorically asking, “what spirit trained in these times, ought not to become insensitive?” Elsewhere he quotes a line of Euripides: “If this mournful day were the first to dawn for me, had I not long sailed in such a sea of troubles, then there would be reason for anguish like that felt by a colt when the reins are first imposed and he bridles at the first touch of the bit. But now, broken by miseries, I am numb.”
it isn’t an excuse
it’s egocentric to assume the world must care about your trivial problems or bow to your whims, princess
Social media has even made men princesses who “need” their coffee and “need” a chest wax and “need” to take a selfie. Is all that really a need or are you an entitled brat?
Hollywood tells us stuff magically happens. That’s why people pay – to see the FICTION.
Reality doesn’t allow escapism but genetic suicide comes close. Moral self-destruction.
The Bible warns about disconnection of the spirit, it’s the ideal condition the Devil wants, all you have left is the animal body, hedonism. There’s no judgement or conscience or sense of higher things, basically Nietzsche’s abyss wasn’t death, it was hedonism. It leads to excuses for oneself – a form of moral relativism.
In this self-imposed withdrawal and “the collapse of conditions for healthy competition in ancient Rome . . . various strategies [had to be] devised by the Romans for creating a new emotional economy and redefining their spirit.” Said another way, “With the loss of the rules and conditions of the good contest, the entire language of honor ‘imploded’ and had to be ‘reconstructed.’”
oh yay critical theory
This reconstruction process would involve nothing less than a complete inversion of values, and produce multiple radiating effects on Roman society.
pride from shame
free from diseased
individual from alone
Honor centered around control, constraint, consistency; the ideal man becomes he who is poised, tranquil, disengaged. The passive values were elevated above the active.
Good for a society of strong defences, death for a society of weak ones, permitting invasion for shekels.
Virtue < Virtue signal
I can be a slut, if I criticize sluts.
Moral hypocrisy, hallmark of degeneracy. The bottom of honour’s barrel. Drunken chambering.
Soldier becomes selfish slutty peacock, basically. It’s Calhoun but IRL. Needn’t be slutty with the opposite sex either, people forget that. The homosexuality rates are an outcrop of this noxious social weed where we don’t expect successful men to marry faithfully.
Shame is GOOD and JUST and NECESSARY for civilization.
“judge not lest ye be judged” refers to using the same societal standard for the entire society i.e. NO exceptions based on class, wealth, sob story etc etc
It does NOT say “never judge” – notice that?
Double standards are the first weakness e.g. cheating in sports.
Read the rest yourself, it’s jarring.
Fifth, as Romans collectively withdrew from participating in a contest culture, they ironically began to lionize the individual who continued to play the game, and did so with a “winner-take-all” disregard for the old rules. The “man not prepared to lose” was idolized.
Instead of competition being something in which every average citizen took part, the masses mounted the bleachers, to cheer on, and live vicariously through, the few “gladiators” still in the arena. As spectators, they both worried over and felt excited by the rise of would-be tyrants who were willing to crush anyone who stood in their way; the thrill of the cult of victory,
infantilising the criminal
siding with the anti-hero
sports substitute for war
idolatry cult – celebrity role models
Cult of voyeurism, we even have that with fucking now.
There was a rarely mentioned line in Fight Club, “this isn’t love, it’s sports-fucking”.
That’s it, right there. That is the essence of the degenerate. The sick men who look up to the unreal Tyler ignore the fact it’s satire, it’s mocking them. But they are shameless. They make all sacred things worldly.
Teenagers are brainwashed but anyone older who views it feels a little disgust, if their conscience, moral compass functions. Tyler says “God hates us”, he means himself. His God is the Narrator, and does hate the impossible fake* ideal. Tyler is Ikea Model Man, a product of society and NOT a person. Americans in particular miss all this subtle irony, since it’s like an ego play. He remodels his kitchen, then his reputation. It’s ridiculous, a morality play. If you could be transplanted into the “perfect” body of a warrior, you’d still be a coward. It’s your soul, your character.
How many buff gym dudes with tatts nowadays would refuse the draft more than the scrawniest Boomer?
Some Boomer-bashing comes from weaker men. Would Tyler go to war? But he runs a military cult.
Tyler knew he was a character, from wall breaks, and would be destroyed in the end like a Devil on the shoulder.
A mannequin of postmodern immoral “manliness”. A man with the appearance of a God and the low morals of a Devil.
*worldly, hedonistic, materialistic, VAPID, Tyler is all-looks
Vapid: I don’t need women ….but here’s Marla, fuck capitalism ….but start a business, I have depression and no purpose ….except I’m energetic and obsessed**, who cares about appearances but punch my face, he’s basically a bloody thot, come on. Well ‘ard, he call them here, like a chav. Can you imagine what he’d do alone? Nothing, he has nothing. It’s like James Bond, if he can’t shoot it or seduce it, he isn’t interested.
Edgy McEdgelord, Puncheyface Champion.
Shocked he didn’t get Marla to strangle him during sex with apron-strings.
Print it, Hollywood!
A chav with better threads.
Modern men are sports-fucking civilization to death. No love, totally sterile of meaning. All about the cult of victory and selfies. Muh “men invented civilization” bullshit is proof, number 1 white men (and women) and 2 get off your arse then and at least maintain it!
It’s like the son of a famous gardener standing before a pile of weeds and bracken, pontificating how it’s HIS garden and it won awards and it’s HIS HIS ALL HIS.
Be Spartan with your words, please.
** fucking uwu lad
Hear me out before you hate me.
As far as historical achievement goes, England is the greatest country on Earth. That’s why we made America, England mark 2: Guns, lots of guns. The first Bill of Rights was English, we had the peasant’s revolt, our own Renaissance/Golden Age and more influence on the world’s learning than anyone else before. More geniuses came from our kin than any other part of the world. America has yet to replicate that intellectual impact (although the fake Jews have tried to posture as something like it) and hasn’t seen a single true genius of American birth in at least a century. Face it, you’re dysgenic.
But we love you irrespective of that.
All the things you value about America originated in mother England, your cultural and kin homeland. ‘America’ has only existed insofar as it was England, transplanted. Since it lacked homogeneity and shared, civilized culture, there is no United States – if there ever was. You still claim to believe in the Rights of Englishmen, with the high trust WEIRD honour culture of Protestant individualistic honesty, while denying its import. Was Henry VIII American now? Catholic countries are looking equally shit right now, from Spain to France to Mexico. The people make the culture, true but adopting a foreign, short-term culture (muh marry young and have too many kids in poverty) is also death. Without the women it detests, Vatican City would die out in a few generations. These places are cultures of death. There is no holy life that Jesus celebrated in them. They must import or else, like a leech without lifeblood, they die.
Likewise, you cannot have warring tribes in the same space – in Shakespeare plays as now. Darwin showed us humans always compete, always! Why aren’t you allowed to teach him in your schools? A “melting pot” is either a loss of each group’s interesting traits (which were unique and precious in their selection) or else one group swarming another once they have the numbers to conquer, as we witnessed in genocidal chimps. Humans are not special exceptions to these natural laws, there are no exceptions.
You’re speaking English – not French or Welsh or (until recently) Spanish. Do not forget your roots or you’ll die like the tree in the frost Tolkien warned us about. Instead of a Tolkien, you have a John Green, selling grubby teen cancer death plots to corrupt your children.
America signed its own death warrant in blood long ago. Rome fell because of its Empire ambitions (you cannot lead your inferiors, they consume you) leading to a weakness of the Roman people and eventual loss of identity.
What is there to fight for? What is there to protect? What is there to do but witness the last gasp of a once-great civilization?
You have trouble recruiting for your military too – or so I hear.
Where did American time preference go? Ask first: Where did it come from?
The great cathedrals required we be stewards of our kin for centuries. America never built a single castle. Nothing in your country was ever intended to last. And you’re proud of this? It’s obscene.
You can tell a lot about a country and its values by their architecture, is all I’ll say.
Where is your homogeneity? Where is your style? What are your materials?
Thailand has better home ownership laws than you and they openly allow child rape. What does that say?
The pretty speeches of American greatness are ringing increasingly hollow, like Anglo Powell describing the British Empire spirit after two world wars did before that. Your best days are clearly behind you but this won’t be a permanent situation unless you ignore it, put it off like rising consumer debt.
Re-capture the Zeitgeist, nobody else has enough strength left.
The gun-hoarding suggests you are not as happy with your ‘country’ as you’d like to seem, either.
Consider the mistakes of Rome again and do the opposite. They suffered from outbreeding depression, in short.
The patrician families selected the wrong suitors for money over a handful of generations and went extinct for it. They were foolish in the only way that mattered: their survival. It only took a few greedy sons marrying wealthy merchants or former but exotic-looking slaves (with slave IQ) and kaput, the whole family line dies. Regression to the mean of abilities is bad enough (Galton) but do not encourage it by marrying moral and intellectual inferiors. You muddy your bloodline, the line ends in short order. In the better times of all patriarchy, daughters were protected, bachelors were taxed (Sparta) to curb the moral decay of hedonism and to inherit, the elders of the family must first approve of their son’s marriage.
Do not forget this.
Men who sexually select poorly fail as surely as women with the same sin (a decision always based on lust). Owing to the fact divorce didn’t really exist, they paid for that error with their entire genetic future, gone. Only the official heir got family support, as it should be.
I’m sure they felt very beneficent as the invaders from the Germanic lot and others washed over them. One generation of maternal softness in fathers or unchecked lust in sons is all it takes. I’m sure they were very proud of their altruism and open-mindedness right up until their entire line died and it was all for nothing.
The purpose of parents is to control their child until they are in a suitable marriage.
Some of you know all of this barring the specification suitable.
Bad wife, bratty children. Decadence is first produced in the choice of spouse.
Kings were vetoed in their choice of bride by the clergy for this reason. Kings!
Nothing else makes the ‘right of Kings’ to rule divine.
Allowing your sons to marry dumpy foreign thots who put out as a mate capture strategy (having nothing else to offer) is a big nail in the coffin of your future. Young men are made vulnerable by vasopressin and feel they ‘love’ the slut who puts out. It’s a biochemical hook and your sons are the fish. No, he won’t find a wife by sleeping around, he’ll find a whore by definition. This is why relatives barred such a union in better societies and times and further, refused to fund the promiscuous or lascivious child whatsoever until they complied. Why do you think the upper-class still have their money after centuries? “Cutting off” the rotten branch. THAT is the core of conservatism, nothing less. The child didn’t need to ‘understand’, let alone agree (it isn’t their money!), the future of the family line was not up for negotiation, they simply needed to honour the wisdom of their parents. [Hooked: New Science on How Casual Sex is Affecting Our Children goes into the biology side of the chemical slut hypnosis.] Brain-addled boys (not mature until around 25) are not making lifelong decisions and must be stopped from ruining their life at least – stopped by their parents. There is no weakness in the child that is not in a parent first, so to exclusively blame the fruit of the tree is churlish.
America’s temporary superiority from the dollar came after the Empire pound as reserve status. The usurers like us to fight one another, classic triangulation tactic, once there is no more labour to extract from the workers.
You work for your own destruction. Look no further than Planned Bachelorhood. You fund the people who will wipe you out in a war to settle your ‘debt’ to them.
A cultural alliance is over-due but American exceptionalism needs to die, or the American founder stock die with it in their indulgent patrician flavour of arrogance.
“Let him marry the seductive slave girl, what’s the harm?” – a Roman patrician, probably.
Do not weaken your seed stock with tainted grain. The Bible warns about all of these things expressly. Why is that? Have you forgotten or do you think American exceptionalism will spare you the wrath of the God you claim to follow?
Like Babylon it will.
Revenge is mine, saith the Lord.
In biology, breeding is the reward. You have produced incentives for worthless whore DNA, in both sexes. Being ‘sexy’ is not a valued quality in any civilization. It isn’t hard, either. With enough plucking, waxing, tanning, lipo, implants, anyone can look like that nowadays. Check yourselves and do better, America used to. I can’t picture Mark Twain electing to vainly show off his tan on holiday in just a pair of tiny gay short shorts. That you no longer bat an eyelid at this late-stage Calhoun rat behaviour, is more disturbing. America used to be globally respected when it had the patrician dignity of its English predecessors. (We’ve mostly lost it too but that’s a slightly different issue, not least because we’re presently imitating ‘American’ aka LA ‘culture’.)
It is not yet truly lost, merely forgotten.
However, the time is nigh. You don’t have long left, look at the white minority statistics and know some people lie on those surveys.
48% of Gen Z (at least) are non-white.
You’re almost dead anyway. 39% of Gen Y was non-white. These are the breeding generations.
You wanted a melting pot, you got it. That I understand but there is one thing outsiders cannot: Why are you so proud of your racial extermination? That’s what ‘melting pot’ means – you lose.
Again, why didn’t they teach you this one snippet of Darwinism? It’s vital to understand history.
You will end up in a Marxist pile of starved or shot bodies at this rate, unless sudden and decisive action is taken. It is mathematical fact and you’re all cravenly dodging it. You’re hipster rebels, poseurs of patriots. You protect nothing of your own, in reality, and defend even less from your ancestry.
This is why even the English now laugh at you and your callow pride. We know the mixed hordes (barbarians still) will vote in your Marxist enslavement, it’s only a matter of time.
Mass deportations, including of ‘families’ complete with white race traitors, will become necessary for you to just continue with ‘your’ culture, your capitalism, your genetic kin and its earned resources, built up over centuries.
The self-hating Anglo stock (r-types) are siding with the new victors, dysgenic raceless survivors, the ones now saying ‘punch a white’ (code Nazi) while putting on a Communist boot to place upon your ‘Merica necks and stamp. You must police your own kind. If men do not hold other men morally accountable, who else is there? Countrymen have an obligation to one another not to make things worse.
You mock the English for being weak (very oppressed by the ‘City’ of London but okay) but we generally disapprove of race mixing, unlike Americans. You perversely celebrate the virtues of your bought waifu. You are already, in this regard, a culture of death, just as surely as the Vatican.
Look at the number of your men lost to out-group unions, a zero sum gain for the Communist voting bloc in future.
Voting behaviour is genetic. There are studies. The ‘blacks’ you complain about are in fact mixed too. Generations of polite arguments and ‘logic’ mean nothing.
You are not being half as calculating as a white man should be, historically, even if you had the lowest of morals. There is a way to have your cake without stealing from your tribe. There is no vive la difference – the Trojan says this at the gate. Look at Greece, look at France. Socialist shit-holes.
Your enemy has told you what you’re doing to betray your country.
To answer the two common complaints from weasel word traitors:
So what if they’re sexy? Sterilise them and put them in brothels if you want to be using them solely for pleasure. So what if they’re nice? Their IQs are in the dumpster. Lots of imbeciles are nice. Child IQ is closest to maternal IQ. Do you want retarded offspring, compared to what you could have won? They can be very, very nice when you go visit them on holiday in their own shithole of a country. There is literally no need to import anything, least of all cheap pussy. Buy a fleshlight, degenerate.
If you disown your people in all their uniqueness for the baited hook of the exotic (their own men don’t want it, they know it’s toxic), at least leave the country permanently for the foreign clime first.
Do not shit the bed for the rest of us, we don’t have a second homeland. Trojan pussy is toxic pussy. That’s how the Spanish sailors were attacked by germ warfare, whichever disease you think did it.
Do not spread that shitskin loin fruit onto us (muh fellow ‘white’) and insist we pay for its sniffles, schooling and future STDs. No.
If you wanna marry out, have the decency to move out. Assuming she still wants you and not a green card to bring in all her cousins. Why are SJWs allowed to marry white men? Did you never ask? They are very spiteful in the target of their seductions, they want to keep you from a white woman and get you to fund your own destruction. They don’t want you because they like you, does the lion like the prey it follows? A trophy whipped white boy holding an alien baby is a status symbol among non-white women.
All women instantly get the meaning: operation cuck.
By fighting, cuck to Israel. By fucking, cuck to Ting Tong. A cuck by any other name is still a cuck.
Henry Cavill was almost cucked completely by that hunter mutt but he heard she was trying to get pregnant and all he wanted was a rimming (from a man, truth be told). I’ve heard stories of reproductive abuse that’d turn your hair white. We all heard about NBA thots emptying out used condoms but the lowest is pipetting from the rectal cavity for re-application elsewhere. White men are totally ignorant of this, never told it’s a risk. Why?
Do not bring in the Trojan bastard anchor babies to bring down your filial culture. War is genetic.
I suspect your next civil war will involve a roving group of executioners insisting to inspect the face of the wife before deciding whether to move onto the next house.
Corruption of moral standard is a vehicle for predators, in more ways than one.
“It’s okay if I do it” – no, we must check everyone in society, you’re free to leave if you don’t like it, snowflake. Society is made up of individuals either doing the right thing or fucking it up deliberately hoping the rest will clean it up. Pro and anti-social, respectively. Adult patriarch and manchild.
When you choose profit over people, you perish. Personal profit includes tawdry appeals to Muh Dick.
American men were respected, even revered, in their true, natural culture of low time preference and pro-family concerns, including health and longevity. Acting ghetto is the opposite of this: artificial, hedonic, anti-natal, anti-national. They’ve become inverted Oreos, cultural deathknells of the change for malleable beige people sweeping us from the globalists. They are a kind of genetic shill, for mixing into non-existence, eventual white genocide. Self-extermination is worse. And you wonder why the culture is rapidly degrading?
Honey, you haven’t seen nothing yet.
America was a bastard in the genetic sense, the first major multicultural experiment with white people.
Cui bono? Who profited? Do you actually think the move to leave your kin, your protectors, to be ruled by cryptoJews was a move taken by Fellow Anglos?
“The races will cheerfully submit”…. After years of pornographic programming to get hot to chunky but squat mixed thots, they sure do.
Mixed people age visibly a lot faster than their non-mix parents too, they’ve yet to study that. It must be genetic. Do not fall for boob goggles. Wanting to sleep with someone doesn’t magically make them a good person, it’s just a Hollywood-planted fetish telling you that in siren song.
I am aware I’m pissing in the wind trying to turn stiff-necked American apostates (thou shalt not adulterate) onto the reality of their permissive suicide.
It’s heartbreaking, actually. I fear once America goes for good, we’re all doomed. America is meant to lead as example, none of us have the remaining strength. We can only follow the current cultural leader, while it’s still culturally white.
I don’t think you’ll do it. I think you’ll bitch, whine and nag about the Great Replacement but refuse to take the actions necessary to save yourselves, to salvage your once-great place to live. God forbid some hipster call you mean, better sell out the country.
America has no real history, no great stories, no true geniuses, no real culture. Even the food is sugary and pilfered from elsewhere e.g. apple pie. American happily poisons its own food and knowingly eats it until they resemble fat piggies. America encourages its own ignorant children to fornicate with their replacements and supports them in all other sins, while calling it a Christian nation. America has never been homogeneous, they always ‘allowed’ an element of rot and therefore, technically, never a unified country (except legally). If you permit cancer, hostile communities of cells, in a body of anything, eventually it’ll kill you. America is a mongrel nation like Sodom and Babylon before it and this split foundation enabled to feel superior to someone commands such suicidal loyalty that it appears to have secured its eventual failure; whether it happened sooner (now) or later with delayed immvasion laws.
One question strikes me going into 2020:
What if your perverse sense of patriotism, a false nationalism, causes you to become a culture of death?
Isn’t it, already?
Was the fornication worth the infanticide of your children?
America is not dirt. They sell you on evil by calling it American.
Well no true Scotsman to that notion.
Everyone who deliberately conceives children with fornication only to kill them wasn’t killed themselves. You are the epitome of the evil of hypocrisy. It saddens me greatly. I’ve been sitting up at night thinking of this, after reading about your demographics. It isn’t the Jews, per se, you are your own enemies. Don’t you see? You gave away your power as a people …for a lacklustre fuck. Just like Rome. The enemy is within, maybe. In more ways than one. They cannot do a thing without your giddy consent, without your willful degeneracy as a nation. Oh, but you’re just one individual, you claim so appeal to exception, you can’t possibly be held responsible for yourself… Last I checked, cultural individualism didn’t mean anti-kin, it was still a culture and hence, pro-natal with ingroup preference; a culture of prosperity made possible by the sacrifices of generations of honest genophilia. Stop calling evil ‘American’. I’m tired of the lies.
Is this ‘American’ cuckoo culture the white people version of the male chick meat grinder slide?
I think so, I hope not.
The creeps are wrong again.
Teenage motherhood has been associated with a wide variety of negative offspring outcomes including poorer cognitive development. In the context of limitations of previous research, this paper assesses the contemporary relevance of this finding. In this study we investigate the long-term cognitive status (IQ) among 21 year adult offspring born to teenage parents using the Mater University Study of Pregnancy- a prospective birth cohort study, which recruited all pregnant mothers attending a large obstetrical hospital in Brisbane, Australia, from 1981 to 1983. The analyses were restricted to a sub-sample of 2643 mother-offspring pair. Offspring IQ was measured using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test at 21 year. Parental age was reported at first clinic visit. Offspring born to teenage mothers (<20 years) have -3.0 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): -4.3, -1.8) points lower IQ compared to children born to mothers ≥20 years and were more likely to have a low IQ (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3, 2.3). Adjustment for a range of confounding and mediating factors including parental socioeconomic status, maternal IQ, maternal smoking and binge drinking in pregnancy, birthweight, breastfeeding and parenting style attenuates the association, though the effect remains statistically significant (-1.4 IQ points; 95% CI: -2.8,-0.1). Similarly the risk of offspring having low IQ remained marginally significantly higher in those born to teenage mothers (OR 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.9).
In contrast, teenage fatherhood is not associated with adult offspring IQ, when adjusted for maternal age. Although the reduction in IQ is quantitatively small, it is indicative of neurodevelopmental disadvantage experienced by the young adult offspring of teenage mothers. Our results suggest that public policy initiatives should be targeted not only at delaying childbearing in the population but also at supporting early life condition of children born to teenage mothers to minimize the risk for disadvantageous outcomes of the next generation.
The small but significant decrease in offspring IQ combined with other challenges often faced by children of teenage mothers may contribute to increased risk of poor educational performance and intergenerational transfer of psychosocial and health disadvantage.
aka poor fitness among r-types
corroborates forensics in the history of anglos
Their bodies haven’t finished developing.
Anonymous Conservative predicted public nudity and then public sex. Technically ‘Pride’ parades have both.
What those stupid people don’t realise is that rapists tend to test out the boundaries of victims with stalking first.
While they rehearse the attack in their mind.
Your culture is invaded, you can’t do it without new risk. You certainly can’t expand it!
We need a good war.