The Valley is close to Hollywood for this reason

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/01/brotopia-silicon-valley-secretive-orgiastic-inner-sanctum

“Many participants don’t seem the least bit embarrassed, much less ashamed. On the contrary, they speak proudly about how they’re overturning traditions and paradigms in their private lives, just as they do in the technology world they rule.”

We are living in the end times of something, no?

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+9:20-21

I SUPPORT CALEXIT.

nb They “rule” nothing, bankers do. When easy credit goes, so do the orgies.

“How could it be anything but weird and dramatic and people on the edge testing everything?” On the one hand, he said, “if you thought like everyone else, you can’t invent the future,””
Talk about false equivalence. Abnormality is not deviance.

Putting the ritual into hazing ritual.
I don’t remember the part of consent law where you need to drug unsuspecting people first. It’s in the rape law, though, very common there.
I’ll enjoy watching their collapse.
So proud they do it at night and in secret. Hmm.
“Rich men expecting casual sexual access to women is anything but a new paradigm.” This is why we haven’t gotten a decent new technology in decades. These fuckers.
Predators are common and the motives always sound the same: wah wah entitlement, the world owes me for being amazing. From the people who made social media.
Who wants to tell them that cliques always collapse? It’s ugly.
– From the people capable of having a social life that isn’t degenerate?
“In fact, these guys even have a term for the women who pursue them: founder hounders.”
It’s quite the opposite. They have to invite the women, don’t they?
“When I ask Founder X whether these men are taking advantage of women by feeding them inhibition-melting drugs at sex parties, he replies that, on the contrary, it’s women who are taking advantage of him and his tribe, preying on them for their money.”
Yes, because any rational person would see sex and cash as interchangeable.
Unless they hand the women cash after to keep quiet about being abused, I’m not buying it.
Tribe. Yes. Tribe…
Also, Founder X?

Subtle.

The first rule of Fuck Club…….. the second rule, if it’s your first night…..

“In their online profiles, men are all but saying, “Hello, would you like to come up to my loft and see my stock options?”’ I used to think they were smart. They take options instead of money?
This is going to be a laughriot.
“once men like this land a woman, they are quick to throw her back.”
Emotionally disturbed manwhores. Insecure attachment, impossible to please. Yes, it’s the women at fault, of course it is.
When that attention dries out, some will inevitably kill themselves. I couldn’t say the world would lose much.
The idea that a man needs to sow any wild oats is such a loser Boomer paradigm. Note how many of these males are Gen X, Gen Y is more rightly disgusted at these habits.
“The claim of being stalked by women often becomes an excuse used by some tech stars to justify their own predatory behavior.”
They chase the woman and whatever happens, including nothing, claim she was stalking him. Crazy bitches don’t get believed.
“why do I have to compromise?” These people claim to be better than you. It’s like toxic Boomer on steroids.
They honestly think they can control or keep another human being. Sad!
Pride comes…
Leto is such a creep (PSA).
“In the Valley, this expectation is often passed off as enlightened—a contribution to the evolution of human behavior.” You are a bonobo in a hoodie. You are backward.
Truly evolved men wouldn’t need to leverage their power to screw people from work.
‘I should be able to have sex with a woman because I’m a rich guy.’ Similar to the logic of GHB druggers and date rapists. They tell themselves it’s a safe situation and the woman chooses to be a target because she’s the defective one.
“It’s way better than a swingers’ club would feel because this is at a home and you are surrounded by people you know.”
How is that not a swinger’s club, at best? Joke’s on them, your microbiome will carry those diseases and impair you later.
I’ve heard of swingers who work exactly like that, the keys in a bowl type. Their cancer rates merit study.
“They talk about diversity on one side of their mouth, but on the other side they say all of this shit.” Male feminists are the biggest misogynists going, yup. Their act goes that they can abuse a woman as much as they like and call her empowered for it.
I find it funny they use the word commitment when asylums used to take perverts. And as if there’s any such thing without faithfulness.
So self-aware they fund artificial friends, this is pathetic. You wanna be self-aware? Put down the drugs.
“we’re all cool about sex” scene.’ Cool? How old are you?
“Crawford can’t even count the number of men who’ve told her how lucky she is to have so many eligible men to date in the male-dominated tech scene.”
(((date)))
Interesting gaslight, fending off nascent lawsuits.
Peter Pan fuckboys hardly count as good, eligible MEN.
“the party scene is now so pervasive that women entrepreneurs say turning down invitations relegates them to the uncool-kids’ table.” Your money will last longer than theirs.
Not doing it was a thing.” Cult says what?
Independent thinkers, heavy on the peer pressure. Aha.
“They talk business at these parties. They do business,” she said. “They decide things.”
But there’s no pressure or abuse of power.
This is part of the reason frigid is really just a way for evil men to criticize the few good women left. What else would they have?
Respect should also mean the right to turn something down and have that be respected. Consensual connotes a right of refusal.
“Over time, I realized that it’s false advertising and it’s not something women should think is a way to get ahead.” Yes, they lie. Like most predators. If they want to work with you, they will?
“If you do participate in these sex parties, don’t ever think about starting a company or having someone invest in you. Those doors get shut. But if you don’t participate, you’re shut out. You’re damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” People who sleep around are generally untrustworthy. These ‘open’ people won’t be public about it. Hmph, cowards hiding behind liberalism.
They’ll die poor so who cares?

If a person has no conscience, that applies to their working hours too.

WHO fails biology

http://who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2018/end-plague-madagascar/en/

These people don’t understand biology. You don’t keep the carriers alive.

It’s like fucking for virginity.

You keep it contained and let those would die anyway, go quietly.

It’s interesting because the original plague came from Asia.

Europe only caught it thanks to the mercantile trade.

Human vectors are contagious for at least a week, they claim.

You can circle the world a few times with modern technology.

Technology is usually the downfall of civilization because people expect it will “save” them from stupid decisions.

They are giving it ample opportunities to evolve increased virulence.

Observe, only an r-type could go to the centre of an outbreak of deadly disease, and happily meet up, shaking hands and sharing air with survivors and their families.

Link: Psycho politics

https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/11/psycho-politics/

‘Liberalism’ is the most profoundly corrupted word in political history. Without any exaggeration, rhetorical license, or metaphorical latitude, it’s the leathery sliced-off face of something murdered long ago which now serves to disguise a foaming chainsaw-wielding maniac sharing none of its DNA… Liberalism, from this point forward, means nothing at all like state-happy progressivism.

At no time in recent history have liberal concerns been less relevant to public policy – even as foils, or ‘neoliberal’ bogeymen. It might be necessary to return to the 1930s to find a time of comparable eclipse. They aren’t being listened to, and they certainly aren’t the object of any animated conversations, unless to slip into social media banter as the butt of jokes. Their concerns seem eccentric, and even identifiably dated, to some point between the end of the 1970s and the Baby Bush quagmire. Where the right once nursed a secret ambivalence for Pinochet, out of admiration for the Chicago Boys, today it’s only interested in the helicopters.

Prosperity Politics won’t work anymore.

You’re late-stage Rome.
The time of options is over.

Welcome to the downslide. We have charts.

Population, r-selection, food supply and famine

I wanted to throw you some further data that doesn’t quite fit in the UK-specific economic post I’ve planned. It does, however, affect our economy, especially our local (European) food supply and costs. It squeezes our own development by virtue of a see-saw, either they command these resources (our landmass and its fruits) or we do.

Previous: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/07/update-to-population-point-in-automation/
Originally: https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/01/06/what-is-automation/

Premise: R-selection, to breed beyond the resources of your land, is suicidal in the long-run but also reduces standard of living in the short.

https://population.org.au/articles/2011-09-16/population-growth-damages-standard-living

“Those states with the highest rates of population growth suffered the largest reduction in standard of living”, said Dr John Coulter, Vice President of Sustainable Population Australia commenting on the latest ABS population data released yesterday.”

This could easily be predicted because, as resources are constant and finite, by increasing the demand, there will be less per head, or a lower standard of living. We can also see this in food prices, with extra-European over-population, beyond locally sustainable levels, basic costs go up, primarily the most fundamental cost being foodstuffs themselves.

If you complain about data volume, here is some going back to 1264.
https://ourworldindata.org/food-prices/

Why would food be important in discussions of population? /sarc
You’re sustainable or you’re dead. The system, ecosystem, is efficient and supportive of its lifeforms, or else it fails. There is no wiggle room for error or data concealment.

http://www.worldwatch.org/global-food-prices-continue-rise-0

“As both climate change and population growth continue to increase, there is reason to believe that food commodity prices will be both higher and more volatile in the decades to come.”

https://www.ft.com/content/84807466-c91d-11e7-ab18-7a9fb7d6163e
We in Britain currently eat from food banks so some Chinese parvenu can eat a roast chicken and feel successful and vote Hammer & Sickle. Where is the social justice outrage? [proof at end]
Petrol has gone down in the same time so no, you can’t blame oil.
To go from this century’s statistics.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/315418/foodpocketbook-2013update-29may14.pdf
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130124042648/http://www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/files/defra-stats-foodfarm-food-pocketbook-2012-130104.pdf

In a report from 2012: “Food prices have risen 12% in real terms over the last five years taking us back to 1997 in terms of cost of food relative to other goods.” “In May 2012 the main food issue of concern to respondents was food prices at 63%, an increase from 60% in November 2011.”
Sounds vaguely like hyperinflation. I’m sure that has no political consequences whatsoever.

Caring is not a choice. We’re producing more food than before, but it’s going out, away to greedy nations like China. [see end]
https://www.trusselltrust.org/2017/04/25/uk-foodbank-use-continues-rise/

Yes, it affects me.
https://foodfoundation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FoodInsecurityBriefing-May-2016-FINAL.pdf
It affects my people.
“The survey found that 28% of adults skimped on their own food in the last year so that others in their households could eat”
Back to the rest of the world:

“Between 2000 and 2012, the World Bank global food price index increased 104.5 percent, at an average annual rate of 6.5 percent.”

“Food prices will also likely be driven up by population growth, increasing global affluence, stronger linkages between agriculture and energy markets, and natural resource constraints. According to the FAO, although high food prices tend to aggravate poverty, food insecurity, and malnutrition, they also represent an opportunity to catalyze long-term investment in agriculture, which could boost resilience to climate change and augment global food security.”

That is one loud canary, isn’t it?

That growth is not possible, the planet is not infinite, infinite growth is impossible. Soil erosion, for instance, is making it so there is LESS arable land in the world over time and this change appears permanent, caused by over-farming….
Britain figured out its business with an Agricultural Revolution, places like China try to outsource their inability to feed their population (Commies) instead of farming responsibly and denying its population the luxuries they purchase on credit and continue to demand.

Here’s a good article that goes into erosion.
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/nov/26/why-seed-banks-arent-the-only-answer-to-food-security

The technology they need won’t exist, it’s magical what they’d expect of it.

http://www.fao.org/docrep/U3550t/u3550t02.htm

Consider that China is actually land-poor, this fits like a glove.

A country’s ability to feed itself very much depends on three factors: availability of arable land, accessible water and population pressures. The more people there are, especially in poor countries with limited amounts of land and water, the fewer resources there are to meet basic needs. If basic needs cannot be met, development stalls and economies begin to unravel. In some poor countries, attempts to increase food production and consumption are undermined by rapid population growth; migration from rural to urban areas; unequal land distribution; shrinking landholdings; deepening rural poverty; and widespread land degradation. Lower birth rates, along with better management of land and water resources, are necessary to avert chronic food shortages.”

Famine. This dude.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Horsemen_of_the_Apocalypse#Black_Horse
https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/the-horsemen-of-revelation/the-horsemen-of-revelation-the-black-horse-of
All these natural disasters are written up as Acts of God.

This is what happens when men run everything, it fails from bureaucracy. You need a blend of influences in society to thrive. They’re too busy competing with one another to provide for the future, nurturing is the female ability.

“By formally recognizing women’s pivotal role, governments will be taking a big step toward safeguarding food production”

They won’t do that, they’re dumb enough to think women are only baby machines and the brain is a coincidence.

At current levels, to support these parasites, the world must somehow pull an additional 70% out of its backside.
https://www.populationinstitute.org/resources/populationonline/issue/1/8/

http://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2083276,00.html
“Population Growth Has Driven Up the Food Price to Alarming Levels”
It opens with Malthus. They know.

I’m not picking on China, they are genuinely that thick. It’s a case study in What Never To Do.

https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a16995

I am by no stretch the first person to note these facts. It’s glaring.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-15/why-we-should-worry-about-china

Recently. That’s just recently.

End.

China is literally taking British food out of the hands of British people.

I’m not making this up. It’s on the official websites. e.g.
http://www.china.doingbusinessguide.co.uk/the-guide/selling-food-to-china/
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/huge-export-win-to-china-for-uk-food-producers
China is in the top 10 markets for our food and drink.
https://www.fdf.org.uk/exports/ukexports.aspx
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exporting-to-china
“growth ensured by Chinese monetary policy” lol
Yes, Communists can be trusted with your money.
https://www.marketingtochina.com/golden-age-british-food-beverage-china/
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/may/20/chinese-middle-class-snap-up-western-goods
https://www.ft.com/content/2166f9ec-b128-11e3-bbd4-00144feab7de
https://themarketmogul.com/chinese-hungry-for-the-british-food-industry/
How many do you NEED?
https://www.globalmeatnews.com/Article/2017/08/14/UK-and-China-sign-200m-pork-export-deal
https://www.express.co.uk/finance/city/841369/Brexit-export-deal-UK-China-food-agreement-British-pork-farming
http://www.cbbc.org/sectors/food-and-drink/

“China will become the world’s largest market for imported foods by 2018, predicts the country’s National Bureau of Statistics of China. China is already the largest grocery market in the world with an estimated value of £1 trillion, according to grocery industry researchers IGD. In 2016 UK food and drink exports to China increased by 49% with particularly strong growth in pork, beer and seafood. As a result China entered the UK’s top 10 food and drink export markets for the first time.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/british-food-exports-will-be-engine-for-growth

Let’s grow by preferentially selling the food our own people need to foreigners with more cash!

Great plan!


Not more valuable cash, more pieces of paper.

Why didn’t this happen to Japan? It’s an island.

Selling to outsiders only from the surplus would be anti-libertarian, anti-globalist.
Wanting to feed our children is racist.

Update:

Just let the white babies starve in the name of Marx. /s

Here’s what is actually going on:

Britain wants to strengthen its industry but needs foreign buyers in the mean time.

The Russians are simply using China to take down America, then pull a Littlefinger and doublecross them. Go to war against them. What are they gonna do? They have no food and no oil to import it with, it would be the easiest victory in military history. Why do you think the EU is helping China? To lessen their dependence on Russia. Russia is post-Communist and sees all the stupid shit China does, yet encourages it? Please. Communist countries like China always need to be rescued by the capitalist ones… who would rescue them? The people who would be calling in debts nobody could afford to pay? And they have well above a billion people, rescue yourself with your superior IQ.

Relevant fact: Soldiers would need even more food. China is doomed.

Psychopath scripts and other scumbag spotting

A highly useful article

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/brainstorm/201712/5-things-psychopaths-and-narcissists-do-in-conversation

Trying to force intimacy is prior to discovering their missing parts.

Related.

When you only have a hammer…

you’re already semi-Communist.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/understanding-the-erotic-code/201712/the-dark-side-outing-men-s-sexual-misdeeds

The authors conclude that the ultimate destination sought by men is “porntopia,” that is, a place of “sheer lust and physical gratification, devoid of courtship, commitment, durable relationships, or mating effort.” On the other hand, they call women’s desired destination “romantopia,” a place of love stories where winning hearts, overcoming obstacles, and getting married reign supreme.

When you only study porn addicts….

Men invented courtly love, so that’s totally off.
There are few poetesses.

There are plenty of masculine female porn addicts (by testosterone).

It is not difficult to see how such information, coupled with the seemingly daily exposure of some men’s unwanted sexual aggression, can lead to the pathologizing of all men as shallow beasts with no control over their impulses. As a sex therapist, however, I have seen the depth of men’s suffering around trying to bridge the gap between their attachment language and their partner’s.

When you only speaking to the suffering….

And it isn’t pathologizing if they have a pathology.
NAMALT, he cries, to cover the obvious error in logic. Even if it’s 99%, that still isn’t good, is it? Never trust a sex therapist, they are some of the worst humans in existence and want to spread the misery.

 Instead, they are hoping that their partner can understand when they use language or actions in the bedroom that may objectify the partner, they are seeking erotic intimacy.

You see, there’s the stupid illogic of saying I didn’t want to kill them, your Honour, only stab them fifty times.
You bring that suffering on yourself.

Assuming women should accommodate men when the sexes are different is absurd.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201711/the-truth-about-sex-differences?collection=1107987

Men shouldn’t accommodate women either. You negotiate and meet halfway like adults

Objectification is demeaning. It’s demeaning to male models as much as female.
You shouldn’t be demeaning anyone you personally know,it’s a form of emotional abuse, however normalised by perverts. Porn is a fantasy of women you do not know. That is the attraction. The association of objectifying them is porn-learned behaviour.

Intimacy is emotional. It doesn’t require the physical. They need to work on their emotions by speaking to the woman, not griping to another man who will console them that they’re fine – because neither get it. You’re fine, just the way you are – spoken like a true SJW. You see, the more you suffer personally, the more they gain.

Consider the source.

You don’t go to a woman for information on erections, do you?

If a woman relinquished all forms of companionship and emotional support, a man would feel repelled, however ‘good’ the sex. That is essentially what these men are doing. Do not treat your woman like a porn star. You wouldn’t want other men to and she’s the one you’re meant to love best. You can try new things without insulting a woman’s dignity, which is the more common form of virtue when chastity is out the window.

You have half the bargain. You don’t do your half, she’s in the right to walk because you fail as a spouse. If you’re not spouses, you owe nothing. She owes you nothing, because you provide no security, which all women crave. This used to be common sense.

Think back to the 50s. Did men want to think of their wife like a stripper? Did they speak of, treat her in those terms? Let alone the hooker many men think they want. Thanks MTV!

Your downstairs brain will ruin your life.

A woman’s nurturing instinct is killed dead by a man who objectifies her body, because a woman’s most precious resources are inner beauty.

Happy husbands do not objectify their wives, this erodes love over time. This should rest my case but you can’t tell a blind man what he’s missing.

 The least helpful thing one can do is succumb wholly to one’s bias toward a feminine approach to relationship, forcing the man into greater feelings of self-loathing, shame, and suppression of his desires.

Sex therapist encourages fornication.

Is that not unhealthy for the men too?
I mean, impulse control in men is just so 19th Century, and we all know how poor the quality of those average men.

And bias? If it isn’t a choice, or an obligation, how is bias the correct term?

Without balancing both of men and women’s sexual and relational needs, there is a risk of creating even more distance between them.

The Sexual Revolution has only been good for us. We are never/always at war with dissatisfactionBad sex is the cardinal sin. You have too much/too little/bad quality and there’s always, ALWAYS something wrong with yougimme money. I can’t fix the problem though, that’s down to you, and whether you feel you need more development work Mafia style beat downs to your ego, courtesy of the people who know your body better than you and just care too damn much. They only want world peace! A fuck-a-thon orgy for peace!

How about a balance of life and death? Hunger and gluttony? Nude and prude?

A balance between good and evil is not physically possible, and that keeps ‘therapists’ rolling in bucks. Either it’s prosocial or antisocial. What is sleeping around? What is an objectifying (psychopathic) attitude to the pair bonding event of sex?

Ugh, r-vendors.

At least preachers are sincere.

Psychopaths objectify naturally, we’re all ants to them. Used/abused/crushed to amuse.

Those of us who have studied and trained in the concept of healthy sexuality—not just sexual pathology—realize the vast ranges of erotic expression in humans. We have barely begun to open to the idea that what has been acceptable culturally—heteronormative, monoganormative, and vanilla sex—does not begin to address who we really are.

“Vanilla sex” is actually healthy, normal, evolutionary sex. If you can’t appreciate normal sex, there is something medically wrong with you.

There’s the money, there’s the sale, there is what you’re really paying for.

Degenerates. Always preaching, always selling.

Go gay for Putin!

To think of all men as having pathological attitudes about sex is a sure way to shut down the emerging awareness of the myriad ways in which we can healthfully engage in this most basic expression of love and attachment, and differentiate it from the unhealthy ways we are seeing it played out in the media

He just said it isn’t about love and is 100% lust but ignore logic.
OMG it’s basic how can you argue with something so basic just go to a standard fuckparty and express yourself so basic, the only way to attach to another human being requires the Kama Sutra (btw quite a shit book).

Related, do gaslighters know what they’re doing?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/are-gaslighters-aware-what-they-dov

Duh. They know they get a thrill out of putting down good/kind/vulnerable people.
You wonder why there are less of them in the world?

The manipulations of gaslighters.

The Alt Right has been flooded with them, power-tripping on the quickly disappearing women and ‘beta virgins’ – no, they won’t read any evolution that makes them know how dumb they are.
“it’s okay to bully you, we’re on the same side” (in evidence, they only care about themselves, not even other white men)
“take a joke, you’re not allowed to be offended by banter” (British term, stop using it America)
“you’re too sensitive, stop caring about things” (not inc. their shit-tier opinions)
“what a loser” (by their highly subjective standards where they are #1 alpha dog in charge)

It would be sad if they weren’t so toxic. Gaslighters are a type of emotional vampire, this is why they threaten to leave – they feed on the drama of being begged to stay.

They leave when the host runs out of histrionics they can cause/manipulate (narcissistic supply) and they kill whatever movement they’re in (the cause of the manosphere implosion).

Men are dumb to gaslighters, failing to distinguish it from regular bullying or, in denser cases, bonding banter. When someone ostracizes you for existing, they’re not trying to bond?
It’s actually the Mean Girls unique form of bullying, deeply female. Isolation, esteem pummeling, all girls have experience with this. Bitchy traps like “you’re really pretty…. so you agree?” are tactically designed to plant a poisonous little seed of doubt or trigger some pain, the stupid men tend to skip ahead and insult a woman’s body parts e.g. her womb and/or fuckability, same as Mean Girls – pregnancy/whore slander and sluttiness/prude impossible fake standards. Think how low a man must be to verbally abuse a woman by her children, existent or not?

Others gaslight in order to feel some sense of control in their own lives by making others depend on them. Gaslighting can also be part of an authoritarian personality. A person with an authoritarian personality tends to think in absolutes: Things are 100 percent right or 100 percent wrong. When a gaslighter thinks that they are not the problem and everyone else is, this is called having an ego-syntonic personality.

It can be very difficult to get ego-syntonic gaslighters into treatment; they believe nothing is wrong with them.

That is called a lie.
In truth, they don’t care or see it as an advantage.
They’re the atheistkultists who lie about Darwin.

A gaslighting spouse or partner may either refuse to go to therapy, or if they do attend with you, they may tell the therapist that you are the problem.

If the therapist recommends that the gaslighter changes a behavior, the gaslighter will label the therapist as incompetent.

Even in therapy, a gaslighter may not truly be aware of, or may refuse to acknowledge that their behavior is the problem.

Worthless scum.

Even if a person is practicing gaslighting behavior without being consciously aware of it, they may get a “payoff” when their victim becomes more dependent on them. And then the cycle continues. The gaslighter also gets a “boost” when there are no checks and balances in place—no one holding them accountable for their behavior.

They claim not to be aware but they know it makes them feel strong?

K.

Someone fell for it. The sob story.

If a gaslighter is not aware of their manipulative behavior, that does not make it acceptable—it is still pathological, and it is still their responsibility. For gaslighters who have read up on this behavior or were taught it, of course, the same rule applies.

People tell them constantly. The definition of insanity? They’re just dense, they will never learn, so they’re commonly just a type of sociopath forever blaming their parents.

Negging is like gaslighting lite. They act like it’s nothing but select for the broken, like attracts like. Anyone with a spine is a ‘bitch’ or in the case of men, ‘an asshole.’ Lord Fauntleroy wants his way so the world must bow to Little Emperor…

The Left won’t stop hitting itself

Just let it.

http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/the-left-punishes-itselfmercilessly-and.html

Just let it happen.

Stop bailing them out like a doting father does his Princess because they begged for mercy, bleeding heart in hand. These are not your people, they are not your problem. They can go to their own, the politicians and the people who donate less to charity cases in studies, the ‘nice’ people.

Don’t be afraid to laugh at them. Their situation, their stupidity, and the fact narcissists think they can always fool you into paying for their decisions with “I didn’t know”.

This is their greatest thrill, to trick you and get everything free, on you.

The proof positive is how they back down once it’s clear you’re onto the lie: I didn’t know becomes I don’t care, you still owe me.

That isn’t a special appeal for mercy (still a fallacy), an appeal to exception, it’s a threat.

A psychopath is essentially a malignant narcissist, they are interchangeable

Traits here
http://nordic.businessinsider.com/15-signs-your-coworker-is-a-psychopath-2017-11/

The psychopathic tendency to not care about the consequences of their actions, no matter how badly they affect others, can be linked to their “remarkable ability to rationalize their behavior,” according to Hare.

While their friends and family may be physically or emotionally hurt by the psychopath’s actions, he or she will typically just deflect the blame with excuses or flat-out deny it.