Aging fathers, ugly kids

That’s one solid explanation for why people are generally uglier nowadays, even the healthy weight.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886916311035

Paternal age negatively predicts offspring physical attractiveness in two, large, nationally representative datasets

Freeze your sperm at 18 for optimum freshness.

Effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness is investigated in two datasets.

Various covariates are utilized.

Significant negative effects are found in both datasets.

Effects are independent of birth order.

Findings consistent with paternal age as a source of new mutations in offspring.

Abstract

The effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness has recently been investigated. Negative effects are predicted as paternal age is a strong proxy for the numbers of common de novo mutations found in the genomes of offspring. As an indicator of underlying genetic quality or fitness, offspring attractiveness should decrease as paternal age increases, evidencing the fitness-reducing effects of these mutations.

That’s a hard rectal red pill.

I’m sure the manosphere will try its hardest to ignore like the dead and defective babies.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Sins-Of-The-Fathers

The problem is, you think you have time.

Thus far results are mixed, with one study finding the predicted effect, and a second smaller study finding the opposite. Here the effect is investigated using two large and representative datasets (Add Health and NCDS),

holy Jesus a sound method

I almost fell off my high horse

both of which contain data on physical attractiveness and paternal age.

Validity! Validity! My queendom for some statistical validity!

The effect is present in both datasets, even after controlling for maternal age at subject’s birth, age of offspring, sex, race, parental and offspring (in the case of Add Health) socio-economic characteristics, parental age at first marriage (in the case of Add Health) and birth order.

The confound control is practically orgasmic, I can’t wait to see how they mansplain this one away.

That is perfect method. But it triggers butthurts and their precious feefees are hurt by the mere implication that degenerate older dads are bad for their kid’s health. Because all those upper crust respectable 1950s dads were like “60 is the new 20 lol!” Who gives a shit if your kids need you past high school? You got more priceless clubbing times you don’t remember, that’s what really matters. Not seeing your grandkids.

Class, race, sex, age at marriage, birth order, maternal age, offspring age – there’s literally nothing else to control for. Nothing. It’s flawless.

THESE. ARE. THE. STUDIES. WE. NEED.

Logically, since women are born with most of their eggs, there wouldn’t be a maternal effect. It isn’t constantly replenishing like the male gamete. Cell division’s a bitch. Male lifestyle for all his years prior

https://www.nhs.uk/news/pregnancy-and-child/dads-smoking-before-conception-harms-kids/

affects the child at conception (and even which sperm is conceived) far more than the details of pregnancy (minus pollutants it’s pretty much the same as in ancient times, the womb is not a new environment).

Maybe add child health although those studies already exist to cross-reference with attractiveness?

As in, are the girls more womanly as adults in WHR and the boys have more manly frames (broad shoulders, narrow waist, which should be a metric of its own)? Or less gender typical? Even androgynous, or fully gender-atypical?

Do younger or older fathers produce better-looking kids in the gendered sense?

[We can tell by looking at old photos but let’s pretend.]

Give me a time machine, please. The ugly wigger types hurt my eyes.

[I have also noted mannish looking sisters tend to be the older, “ugly” sister of two -coughs Beatrice- and the girly looking brothers tend to be the younger, usually gay one. Cannot unsee.]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595000682

e.g.

“In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance). Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms. The male beard is not obviously related to phenotypic quality and may have evolved through a process of runaway intersexual selection.”

The beard can also be a sign of poor grade genes e.g. savages, wolf man. Overall bone structure uber alles.

Maybe factor in sexual activity of the father prior to conception? Especially partner count and STDs. STDs are known to harm attractiveness in the host [coughs David Beckham, most of Hollywood] so why not the offspring’s?

Back to the top study:

The apparent robustness of the effect to different operationalizations of attractiveness suggests high generalizability, however the results must be interpreted with caution, as controls for parental levels of attractiveness were indirect only in the present study.

aka please don’t sue us but you know it’s true

But you can wait forever because the Jews said so!

Say, who owns all the biotech and IVF companies?

https://www.fertilitybridge.com/blog/2018/4/11/battleforivfmarketwallstreetvsprivatepractice

[chuckles in Israel shekels]

https://hmcisrael.com/specialty/ivf-israel/

“According to statistics, around 20% of couples wishing to conceive are faced with certain obstacles that inhibit a successful pregnancy.

Fertility Treatment is one of the most prioritized fields of medicine in Israel.”

Sure, you can wait for decades! Also, cut the kid when they’re born!

We need more future little Viagra users.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.2307/2648044

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7752-female-genital-mutilation-can-cause-infertility/

Does Circumcision Decrease the Fertility of Sperm in the Male?

“However, birth rates are much higher in countries where the men are predominantly uncircumcised.”

There is no question that an uncircumcised man has a cooler penis than a circumcised man in the flaccid state. For some reason, removal of the foreskin is the reason for this. There seems to be some sort of temperature sensor in the foreskin that may control penile temperature. Removing the foreskin gets rid of this sensor.

It only takes a few temperature degrees of difference to damage sperm. As the penis is in close proximity to the testicles, it’s quite likely that a cooler penis would help keep the testicles cooler (Remember that men are more potent in the colder months of the year). Under these condition, if the testicles got too cold, they can always be retracted closer to the body.

Almost like God gave men a prepuce solely for this evolutionary function in reproduction.

…Now consider this: Circumcised and uncircumcised men have the same penis temperature on full erection, as we stated earlier in this article. So, clearly, there is a specific reason why a natural-uncircumcised penis remains at a cooler temperature during the flaccid state. When the penis is erect it is no longer in close proximity with the testicles, so penile temperature should not affect the testicular temperature at this phase (be the penis circumcised or uncircumcised).

Upon orgasm, the penis tends to retract more into the pelvis (at least with my experience). Due to the friction and increased blood flow that occurred during the sexual act, it makes sense that the penis will have an increase in temperature in a flaccid state post-sex than in a flaccid state previous to the sexual act. Could this retraction be another mechanism for the “heated” penis to steer clear of the testicles?

Go there, science.

Circumcision and Male Fertility: Is There a Link?

Scientists have recently concluded that circumcision can help with infertility in males suffering from two very specific diseases.

So… not generalizable.

Some woman perv studies after all that penis talk.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000269

Women’s faces and voices may be cues to their reproductive potential. If so, then individual differences in indices of female fecundity and residual reproductive value, such as hormonal profiles, body composition, and age, should be associated with women’s facial and vocal attractiveness to men. However, previous research on these associations is sparse, has rendered mixed results, and is limited to Western samples. The current study therefore explored relationships between correlates of reproductive capability (testosterone levels, age, and body mass index [BMI]) and facial and vocal attractiveness in women from industrial and foraging societies. Women’s facial and vocal attractiveness was associated with each of these indicators in at least one of the two samples. The patterns of these associations suggest that women’s faces and voices provide cues to both common and unique components of reproductive potential and help explain the evolution of men’s mating preferences.

Lesson: Avoid the manjaw.

Women change their vocal pitch all the time though. European women are taught to make it lower at school (speak up = louder, lower pitch), Asians try to make it higher. The key is how they sound when hysterically upset. That’s their true level. Europeans go up, Asians down.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513812000475

Attractive facial features in women are assumed to signal fertility, but whether facial attractiveness predicts reproductive success in women is still a matter of debate. We investigated the association between facial attractiveness at young adulthood and reproductive life history—number of children and pregnancies—in women of a rural community. For the analysis of reproductive success, we divided the sample into women who used contraceptives and women who did not.

So partnered, married women. Not single ones.

Introducing two-dimensional geometric morphometric methodology, we analysed which specific characteristics in facial shape drive the assessment of attractiveness and covary with lifetime reproductive success. A set of 93 (semi)landmarks was digitized as two-dimensional coordinates in postmenopausal faces. We calculated the degree of fluctuating asymmetry and regressed facial shape on facial attractiveness at youth and reproductive success. Among women who never used hormonal contraceptives, we found attractive women to have more biological offspring than less attractive women. These findings are not affected by sociodemographic variables. Postmenopausal faces corresponding to high reproductive success show more feminine features—facial characteristics previously assumed to be honest cues to fertility. Our findings support the notion that facial attractiveness at the age of mate choice predicts reproductive success and that facial attractiveness is based on facial characteristics, which seem to remain stable until postmenopausal age.

Menopause is not the face equalizer you think.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816302318

African and European perception of African female attractiveness

Dare you to do the same study with every race judging every other.

Majority of research on attractiveness is restricted to faces of European origin. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across communities due to variations in both facial morphology and local standards of beauty. We investigated the relative contribution of four facial markers of attractiveness based on 101 female facial portraits (standardized, non-manipulated) from Cameroon and Namibia, which were assessed by local male raters and by raters from a distant European population, the Czech Republic. Images from Cameroon include only women of Bantu origin, while Namibians are represented by women of both Bantu (Owambo/Herero) and Nama origin. While controlling for age and BMI, we explored the relationship between female attractiveness and a set of facial traits: fluctuating asymmetry, averageness, shape sexual dimorphism, and skin color (rated and measured in CIELab color space).

In the Cameroonian sample, local male raters favored lighter-skinned female faces with morphology closer to average. The attractiveness of Nama women as rated by Nama men positively correlated with lighter complexion, but this did not extend to rating by Cameroonian men. The attractiveness of Namibian Owambo/Herero women was positively associated with facial femininity and lighter complexion when judged by both Cameroonian and Nama male raters. In all samples, the attractiveness as rated by Czech men was predicted by age and BMI, but not by skin color. We found no significant association between attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry in any of the tested samples. When controlling for age, the effect of skin color on attractiveness turned to be non-significant in the Owambo/Herrero and Nama sample, but remained significant in the Cameroonian sample. Variations in skin color thus represent an important factor of African female attractiveness within the African context, but they do not seem to affect judgements made by European raters.

They don’t want any of them.

Sensitivity to some facial markers of female attractiveness thus seems to be restricted to regional populations and/or constrained by shared ethnicity.

Paler women have more oestrogen. So duh.

Women reject old guys who’d give them dead or ugly kids:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816301283

“This finding is consistent with men’s stated preference for young, fertile women in mating and suggests that the typical pattern is generated by women’s limiting role in mating.”

aka their gender role

“older men tend to marry older women, including those who are peri- and post-menopausal”

TIL Korea is so degenerate it has slave markets. Ooof.

So much for the myth that young women have the hots for them. Yeah, I’m sure the Jap schoolgirl came onto you, right perv?

Deadbeats are the end of the West:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816303671

Research in evolutionary psychology, and life history theory in particular, has yielded important insights into the developmental processes that underpin variation in growth, psychological functioning, and behavioral outcomes across individuals. Yet, there are methodological concerns that limit the ability to draw causal inferences about human development and psychological functioning within a life history framework. The current study used a simulation-based modeling approach to estimate the degree of genetic confounding in tests of a well-researched life history hypothesis: that father absence (X) is associated with earlier age at menarche (Y). The results demonstrate that the genetic correlation between X and Y can confound the phenotypic association between the two variables, even if the genetic correlation is small—suggesting that failure to control for the genetic correlation between X and Y could produce a spurious phenotypic correlation. We discuss the implications of these results for research on human life history, and highlight the utility of incorporating genetically sensitive tests into future life history research.

I don’t think debtor’s prisons will come back – but if you breed it, you should feed it. I think the abandoned women that existed since Biblical times will just hire bounty hunters to shoot the first family deserter for a share of his life insurance policy.

Patriarchs everywhere would rejoice at culling the cads. The women get a widow’s pension.

Everyone wins. Hey, you said “until death do us part”. Men used to die by their oaths.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381400052X

I have noticed that immigrant men have a higher pitch than their non-immigrant relatives.

Maybe the act of immigration impairs masculinity?

Low male voice pitch may communicate potential benefits for offspring in the form of heritable health and/or dominance, whereas access to resources may be indicated by correlates of socioeconomic status, such as sociolinguistic features. Here, we examine if voice pitch and social dialect influence women’s perceptions of men’s socioeconomic status and attractiveness. In Study 1, women perceived lower pitched male voices as higher in socioeconomic status than higher pitched male voices.

A lot of PUAs get shot down for 1. being brown and feeling entitled to a white woman, the lowest miscegenation group also further sickened by repeated forced “refugee” interactions and 2. having a high pitch voice and effete face compared to their national relatives. Compare within the white race, the “Latin lover” in Italy versus Italian immigrants raised and living in London, who sound like cartoon chipmunks by comparison.

Yes, we notice.

No, you can’t change it. We notice.

Same applies to white men who moved South so it appears to be immigration. Either being an immigrant or the act itself makes a man less manly. Most obviously, torso body fat deposition like a woman of their group and the sisters become like the men at home, more athletic.

In Study 2, women independently perceived lower pitched voices and higher status sociolinguistic dialects as higher in socioeconomic status and attractiveness.

It isn’t the money, it’s the genes.

Good genes, good brains, good money. Fixating on the money is what ugly guys do – Muslim prince to Jewish media mogul.

We also found a significant interaction wherein women preferred lower pitched men’s voices more often when dialects were lower in sociolinguistic status than when they were higher in sociolinguistic status.

Capacity to protect. Not a desk jockey. The middle-class is effeminate. They want army. No cowards.

Women also perceived lower pitched voices as higher in socioeconomic status more often when dialects were higher in sociolinguistic status than when lower in sociolinguistic status.

Women know quality, really? Almost like our lives depend on it.

Finally, women’s own self-rated socioeconomic status was positively related to their preferences for voices with higher status sociolinguistic dialects, but not to their preferences for voice pitch.

Plenty of men chose to marry down to get a looker out of their genetic league, hypergamy.

Erotic capital is worth it, as you can tell by the fertility study above, even post-menopausal they’re better-looking.

Hence, women’s preferences for traits associated with potentially biologically heritable benefits, such as low voice pitch, are moderated by the presence of traits associated with resource accrual, such as social dialect markers. However, women’s preferences for language markers of resource accrual may be functionally independent from preferences for potential biological indicators of heritable benefits, such as voice pitch.

Women…. making…. mate choices?

mutation load is important?

 

The wages of sin are death

You’re not allowed to talk about it.

I can’t think of anything worse than a cruise ship full of naked, horny Boomers.

Who still think they’re It and a bag of chips. Youth culture is cancer. The body ages but the brain remains the same…. that’s called retardation, kids!

https://www.orbitz.com/blog/2016/11/9-places-get-naked-without-raising-fuss-nsfw/

“The bar will inevitably draw its fairshare of gawkers and despite popular opinion, millennials are less likely to strip down than their baby boomer counterparts.”

Duh. Have some fucking DIGNITY.

And what does their Biblical whoredom, get them?

And yes, it’s the men pulling a Hemingway.

Suicide rates higher among baby boomer men, study finds

The women are disgusted at first with the manwhores and quietly retract (women are quiet in disgust but do have far higher sexual disgust than men, in studies) but by the time the man realises he ruined himself and even his fellow man doesn’t respect him, it’s too late.

Like the two paths pre-internet meme of a godly boy and a degenerate one. Life of vice, pay the price.

Player “burnout” is just the start.

Suicide is aka self-murder.

And atemporal, no blaming modern trends.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190313-why-more-men-kill-themselves-than-women
‘The trend goes back a long way. “As long as we’ve been recording it, we’ve seen this disparity,”
“Suicide is a hugely sensitive, complex issue with a tangled multitude of causes – and the very nature of a death by suicide means we can never fully know the reasons behind it.”
Bullshit. Kill off the white man. That’s the aim.
Men report a higher count. No, they’re not making it up, already factored in is something called a “lie scale”, I’ve taken surveys. Real ones. The maths is baked in. Even when totally anonymous with no benefit to number inflation, male count is always higher, because they’re sleeping with a smaller proportion of women.

Which niche groups have both factors?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/bisexual-women-are-at-higher-risk-for-depression-and-suicide

Why Older Gay Men Are Attempting Suicide at a Higher Rate


https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2017/10/14/Suicide-risk-for-gay-men-5x-higher-for-those-with-less-schooling-income-study/3521507999505/

PromiscuityxSuicideRisk

Is this an ageless finding?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-truth-about-exercise-addiction/201710/why-are-suicide-rates-higher-among-lgbtq-youth

https://web.archive.org/web/20141202032238/https://blogs.lcms.org/2014/study-suicide
“Robin Williams’ suicide may not have been that surprising: Baby Boomer men are 60 percent more likely to take their own life than their fathers’ generation, according to a Rutgers University sociologist.”

I wonder why the ‘free love’ generation ends up hating themselves. Mystery, that one.

“The trend is particularly alarming because middle age is typically a time when suicide rates decline before rising again in old age.”
It’s that strong of a generational change, I wonder why. What makes Boomers culturally distinct?

“The rise we’ve seen in suicide rates since 1999 among boomers while in their 40s and 50s is unusual,” Phillips said. Boomer men are now 60 percent more likely to take their own lives then men their age who were born in the 1930s — or roughly men of their fathers’ generation.

“We’re in a position now where suicide rates for middle-aged people are higher than those for the elderly,” she said. “That hasn’t happened before, at least not in the last century.”

I guess the herpes could’ve spread to their brain (a real thing).

“Their disinclination to go to church appears to be permanent.”
Sure this has NO effect on high-risk behaviour, don’t look into it. Not like it’s your job.

Let it happen. Enjoy the show. The freak show.
https://biblehub.com/romans/6-23.htm

The Lord works in mysterious ways. That’s why I like DATA.

[laughs in micro-accelerationism]

Add up all the money blacks have gotten by being in America and they owe WHITES the reparations.

Free one-way plane rides home to Mother Africa though. If they really wanna play THAT game.

I enjoy the frame of whitey as the problemo.

Well, we could always deport Cortez back to her non-white country, away from the evil white people she chose to live around. Her false consciousness tells her it’s better to live around whites, it’s internalised white supremacy, it’s for her own good that we ‘help’ her educate herself. Better, we could make it so people’s taxes only pay toward services for members of their own race.

End tax based reparations.

I’m having fun with this election cycle already.

yo can somebody please film an update??

and some brit bitch a brexit version?

the time is now

Sexual coercion still illegal

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/471582-jessica-yaniv-transgender-wax-balls/

If a woman doesn’t wanna touch your balls, no still means no.

They’re so clearly just sex predators waiting for plausible deniability.

Why not get a man to wax you? So entitled.

Due to inexperience or religion, the women denied her requests, to which she declared it was discrimination on the basis of gender identity.

Yeah, it’s also about religion.

it is not a violation for a service provider to not wax a type of genitals they are not trained for, or haven’t consented to wax; a pleasant turn of events for vulnerable women who should never be forced to touch male genitalia. 

Consider that as precedent, if the creep got his way.

Jonathan (his real name), is a con artist who is using gender identity to engage in perverted fantasies.

um, as opposed to?

it’s autogynephilia

and there are psychopathic rapists who just want access to women, like the prison guy

two places women undress – gym and bathroom plus the place they sleep – shelters/prison

More so as men are now using transgenderism as an excuse to invade women’s private spaces.

Men who feel sexually entitled also extend that to other human beings? Huh.

Last year, nine homeless women kicked off a lawsuit against a women’s shelter after they were FORCED to shower with a trans-woman. The shelter requires everyone to shower in groups,

affront to human dignity, this isn’t Nazi Germany

legal right to religious modesty

r-types are funny about open changing rooms and showers, they hate cubicles because they are predatory and like to revoke the right to privacy including the natural modesty of Ks

and the person who self-identified as trans began making sexual remarks and even stared at the others as they bathed. 

Creep is creepy, no shit.

This is why we had asylums.

A lot of rapists used to go to asylums and it was noted they enjoyed dressing up as women.

Even those locked behind bars are not safe, as a trans inmate was given a life sentence after sexually assaulting women in prison. That this man was even in a women’s prison is a horrid oversight by those in charge, as he had previous convictions related to sex crime.

Oversight?

The rich want tax cattle and your children raped*, oppose this bullshit.

*(If your kids have trauma, theirs have a competitive edge in the world. AKA The Left’s MO)

I do not know what the solution is, more so as I myself am trans.

aaaaaah

that explains the “don’t panic” tone of “not all” despite prison studies saying ‘basically characteristic’

But something does need to change. Because today it may be “wax my balls,” but tomorrow it could be a parent-free topless pool party for kids.

Oh wait, Yaniv already tried that too.

Let women carry pepper spray and knives FFS.

comment

He doesnt want surgery. he wants to get at little girls.

comment about the DARVO typical of sexual psychopaths

She calls “himself” a protected group, but ignores the fact that religious liberties are themselves protected. Human garbage. Outright liar, then proceeds to try to not only force other people to lie along with you, but grab your private parts while they do it. That is the epitome of abuse, “he” and others like “him” should be arrested for sexual assault!

It’s the control. Foot in the door with “let me wear a dress” then “let me use the toilet” then “let me near your kids and you’d better call me Ma’am”. The threats come in with psychopaths, mask slip upon showing boundaries and saying NO. Read Hare’s work.

The sexual entitlement of the sadist knows no bounds. They enjoy the FORCING, that’s why finding someone into it never seems possible. They enjoy the humiliation aspect.

Previously it was just tricking people.

comments, refreshingly uncensored

What a thoroughly revolting specimen of a human being this person is.

I always knew guillotines would be back in fashion.

Could solve that problem with a “cigar cutter” (and cheaper)

Is Yaniv a )ew? The root of all evil…

Amazing. Yaniv is a Jewish name. Every. Single. Time.

What people really think of them.

The question is: what is wrong with men?

There’s a ton of ((((pornographic))) brainwashing, that’s for sure. All this entitlement is weird and dehumanising. Even male friends are now believing harassment stories because gay guys are openly doing the same to them (since you can’t arrest them).

Any time a genetic male feels like a woman has to see his junk, touch his junk or be naked in the same vacinity as him i.e changing room , bathrooms ..its sexual harassment . Also, bathrooms have always been a woman safe space as well as changing rooms. The place she goes to when she is being followed by a creeper, or has been assaulted , or is getting harassed. We open that up to the opposite sex…where do women go to feels safe in public places?

True. They’re a safe harbour.

Well safe spaces do exist the Left just co-opted the term to endanger women.

Schools are safe spaces for kids, obviously. Mixed sex schools should be banned for that reason alone. The left was eager to make more of them in the 60-70s pedo era to reduce the safety of that space. The conservatives don’t care.

Mixed schools also have worse grades, so an automatic advantage to those spared.

Normalising paraphilias typical of predators as ‘fun kink’ is really SJW victim blaming. If it’s fun for one party and degrading to the other, it’s a human rights crime.

Call the freaks what they are. Manginas.

Link: Intellectual Yet Idiot

View at Medium.com

medium.com/incerto/the-intellectual-yet-idiot-13211e2d0577

The IYI pathologizes others for doing things he doesn’t understand without ever realizing it is his understanding that may be limited. He thinks people should act according to their best interests and he knows their interests, particularly if they are “red necks” or English non-crisp-vowel class who voted for Brexit. When plebeians do something that makes sense to them, but not to him, the IYI uses the term “uneducated”. What we generally call participation in the political process, he calls by two distinct designations: “democracy” when it fits the IYI, and “populism” when the plebeians dare voting in a way that contradicts his preferences.

I’d call them false cardinals of the Cathedral but okay.

Intellectual is an endogenous quality they lack, a personality too (Charlton).

Midwits don’t learn from rules (they change them, magical thinking) or society (equalism or die) or experience. All they do is take tests and repeat dogma.

telling the rest of us 1) what to do, 2) what to eat, 3) how to speak, 4) how to think… and 5) who to vote for.

But the problem is the one-eyed following the blind: these self-described members of the “intelligentsia” can’t find a coconut in Coconut Island, meaning they aren’t intelligent enough to define intelligence hence fall into circularities — but their main skill is capacity to pass exams written by people like them. With psychology papers replicating less than 40%, dietary advice reversing after 30 years of fatphobia, macroeconomic analysis working worse than astrology, the appointment of Bernanke who was less than clueless of the risks, and pharmaceutical trials replicating at best only 1/3 of the time, people are perfectly entitled to rely on their own ancestral instinct and listen to their grandmothers (or Montaigne and such filtered classical knowledge) with a better track record than these policymaking goons.

I love Taleb.

But it’s mental martial law. Thinktank r smart, college r smart, expert r smart, you trust expert like priest, expert r good, follow expert.

Equalism is a death cult because their version of being wrong or failing is “I guess I’ll just die”.

Russell Brand on Joker

It’s sad this guy of all people has a better take on this than the average right-wing youtuber.

Nice until we’re not basically. Classism from plutocracy. It isn’t about means of production but native resources. You can’t pull yourself up by your bootstraps… if you don’t have boots.

comment

WTF! Is that really Russell Brand? This is brilliant best Joker review on YouTube and spoiler free on top of that

r-types do understand what they’re doing, they’re just over-estimating their intelligence and competence

consumer culture and such, they know

cultural deprivation of survival needs, including right to self identity (the new patriotism gap is filled by the tranny stuff, imaginary identities), it’s needed for sanity, hence not in the hierarchy

cultural treason, betrayal of meritocracy

they’ll pretend to wanna work with us in the future, to control and subvert, as you see him cuck toward the end

convenient timing

they’ll be like a cult and want a ton of slaves, r-types are easy to spot by no pair bonding ability

think termite mound implosion, you don’t want to align with predatory men, they screw men too