Pedos self-expose eventually

They have a Common Purpose.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL

Apparently decades of observed mental illness, substance abuse, attachment disorder, later divorce, the cycle of abuse with their own children, trauma including PTSD and high suicide rates don’t count as ‘harm’.

Apparently they need to spontaneously combust.

in context

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/11/labour-bought-data-on-more-than-1m-mums-and-their-children-emmas-diary

that one went down the memory-hole… put it back

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/politics/outrage-as-yorkshire-vicar-calls-lgbti-lessons-state-sponsored-child-abuse-1-9812091

Rapist nanny state, called it.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2019/06/01/one-cult-to-rule-them-all-one-cult-to-find-them/

Sex Ed is grooming, people. Sexualisation of minors is grooming.

In full, top article:

“PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.

reduced to zero

campaign for sweetest spot on a stake

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

They’re already prosecuting like this in cases by the CPS.
Minors can’t cry rape because their rapist is claiming willing.

And gets away with it. Look at the law.

Sick world.

‘Rape gangs’ are actually sex slave owners. It’s slavery.

(Pedo rings are just one form of sex slavery.)

Actually, consent documents would be a good idea but it’s called a marriage certificate.

‘Consent’ is a will o’ wisp for predators.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

Gaslighting, victim blaming.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.

Sexual predator says its teeth aren’t sharp.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”

Justice is dead.

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labour MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.

Sure. Save the hive.

She said: “Any suggestion that I supported or condoned the vile crimes of child abusers is completely untrue.

Er….

“As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.

men, not minors

and plenty of men are raped regardless

“When Jack Dromey, as NCCL chairman in 1976, vigorously opposed PIE at the NCCL AGM, he did so with the full support of the executive committee and myself as general secretary.”

However Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.

Now they’re teaching it in primary schools!

Step by step instruction.

Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.

Thought Prison: “Effectiveness is irrelevant: for political correctness abstract and altruistic allocation is intrinsically superior to human agency; it is therefore morally necessary to replace individual freedom with systemic coercion, regardless of the consequences.”

Coercion vitiates consent. We, the People, do not consent.

“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.

“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”

Dromey’s wife Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, was legal officer at the NCCL between 1978 and 1982. She has expressed her “regret” over the NCCL’s involvement with PIE but has pointedly declined to apologise.”

Bring back hanging when?

We need a referendum on how to deal with paedophiles.

*scroll*
COMMENTS UNAVAILABLE

I could think of a few.

One cult to rule them all, one cult to find them

Why are all cults, rape cults, masquerading as polygamy? The German church with the cages to this day?

Remember as you read about the sudden urgency in the history of the human species for correctional sex re-education.

I am going to explain the root of all PC (ambitious) and the purpose of Sex Ed re pedophiles.
I have gleaned this from teachers.

“And PC reacts against The Truth. Truth is to be subordinated to the goal of subversion. Unwanted Truths are Hate Facts. Universally known Truths are replaced with narrow scraps of bureaucratically defined principles; spontaneous and obvious knowledge is contested, undermined, broken-up and contradicted one fragment at a time and replaced with Professional Consensus (Peer Review).”

from https://thoughtprison-pc.blogspot.com/

I defy the Politically Correct Cult’s value judgments. I deny them and live in opposition to them.

This is rare. There are also efforts to learn their tactics and dig up what they really are. The process of sexualising children into endorsing their own rape (and, later, forming a ‘trauma bond’ they can easily gaslight as ‘love’) is the goal of pedophilia, both legally and literally. The corruption of the innocent was always a crime dating back to ancient times as a treasonous attack on everything society had developed and swore to protect. It also happened to be most important in the sexual realm but modern politics weirdly only recognises the political.

I thought the personal was political?

Can’t get more personal than intimate. Why was it ever the state’s affair what you did with various holes?

Celebrate or shame, that’s a moral claim from ‘postmodernists’ and a porous church/state boundary.

Kids already figure out p>v.

What you need to teach them is all the depraved stuff it wouldn’t occur to most adults to even TRY.

As Bandura taught us, kids don’t imitate any harmful instruction given by an authority figure with a duty of care based on trust.

Child rape hasn’t skyrocketed since they included instructions on it for ‘safety’.

An under-developed body isn’t more prone to injury and disease…. /s

Pair bonding is never mentioned and ‘free love’ pleasure considered the purpose of babymaking.

Darwin is never taught in classes ostensibly about reproduction…. any purpose beyond sexual narcissism is banned.

They won’t call a boyfriend a lover but they’ll tell you it’s practically compulsory, expected you shop around and refine your prostitution skills with a stream of them. No alternatives. Being used up like a cum rag is ‘fun’.

No statistical consequences, whither informed consent?

Shame the virgins because freedom and empowerment.

Straight men valued by how homosexual they behave, sexually. A soulless hedonic treadmill of superficiality, numbers and filthy stories of infection for the entertainment of people who hate you.

They won’t tell you how the Pill works (chemical abortifacient for couples fucking*) but they’ll tell you how great it is. Be a happy cum sponge because the Patriarchy is flattering you by wanting to fuck you and nothing else, ever. Being a hole that is a goal is your life’s goal.

False consciousness is at play.

“Let’s punish Patriarchy by being its whore” is the general gist.

According to Piaget’s work, prior to puberty children are biologically incapable of abstract thought. This is why nothing is real to them except Santa. They live in a fantasy of equally valid ideas, having no experience or brainpower to question it. This includes criticism or safety concerns.

‘Nuff said.

Naturally, in all their discussions of celebrating feelings, sexual disgust is banned.

No means no but you aren’t allowed to find someone ugly, physically and especially morally.

Wait, isn’t that the primary reason for No? Attraction just ain’t there?

That conveniently limits the options to deny them as social excuse, dunnit?

Attraction is from ‘animal magnetism’. Sexual attraction you’ve heard of, the inverse you haven’t.

Complete coincidence, huh?

“Sex Ed” makes sense only as AA for the horny and sexually repulsive. The unfit.

Moral repulsion must be extinguished as ‘hate’. It resembles independent thought.

Can’t have cultural standards creeping up on the degenerates, can we?

Can’t have women striking from the likes of Tindr and clubbing.
Selection pressures are the Devil, Hitler.

Sexual selection is oppression.

Explaining random -isms and tidbits of their fevered wet dreams.

Down with Western Civ

Er …. why?

What did Western Civ have, that none of the others have?

That normies, powerless normies who aren’t running banks or launching IPOs, would care about?

That young soy men would especially care about?

Sexual selection, freedom of choice. Sexual discretion.

It’s like Neo-Freudianism. Everything is about sex, all of politics is now rebranded as hate crime if you’re not doing the Devil’s tango with a fat borderline tranny. A multicultural orgy of “acceptance” because who has lower standards than a Third Worlder accustomed to drinking their own shit? Sex slaves deported if they don’t comply, EE women…

This keeps the weak men in line with dopamine hits, pacified from political rebellion so it is required weaker-willed women are caught early in childhood, at their most docile.

The personal is NOT political, telling people how to use their bodies is tyranny.

No borders, no escape. Everything they do makes sense, suddenly.

When did Sex Ed become suddenly vital to the re-education of children?

Around the time Darwin was writing about the quality barriers to existence.

Minus the gaslighting efforts, the cream of the genetic crop would marry out of the dating scene and never give the creepy losers who want to rape them ‘a chance’.

Chance? This isn’t equality. It’s sanity. Ambiguity makes everyone think they’re desperate.

Why are there more pedo teachers than ever before? Boundary formation.

Personal boundary testing.

[If a person wants to fuck you, knowing you don’t want them, that’s a rapist. Consent is not complex. Assume no and move on.]

Follow the slutty model, girls, the role model.

White guilt, white models.

Why is James Bond white? How are those kid’s films?

Kids who believe Brave New World style that their body belongs to anyone who gives them the insult of cheap attention (lechery) will never lead to adults with a healthy sense of self-ownership, dignity and property rights, sworn enemy of the Cultural Marxist.

Instead they’ll eat their feelings and medicate with a void where identity and pride should be. The repressed repulsion will become anti-natal, morphing into a bizarre desire for sex but a disgust for babies.

Disgust for the degenerate becomes disgust for their body’s reproductive function and the truly innocent.

Babymaking, the conceptual association divorced of ‘pleasure’, stripped of excuses, triggers deep feelings of shame and loathing, for reasons too long repressed to explain.

It’s an easy link to test: more sexual partners versus disgust at the thought of parenthood.

If you want to trigger leftists, including the hidden ones, tell them sexual repulsion is a human right.

Any meme effort that cuts this Gordian knot instantly exposes and kills their grassroots support.

Sexual orientation isn’t a choice now, is it? Like how being male and female never used to be a choice.

See, the ‘sexuality is a choice’ stage is actually the next one. Asexuals, just try it ‘fluidity’, female Viagra, the Pill already made women (and male users/beneficiaries) less choosy, more unnatural, biologically.

If old men didn’t have access to Viagra, what would they do with their time?

If young men didn’t assume all young women were on the Pill, who would they flirt with?

MOTHER Nature has limits for good reason. Masturbation with another person is postmodern freakishness.

This repulsion line cuts off both Hydra heads, forever. It exposes the true ‘rape culture’.

Why did the SJW and Muslim rowing on national TV seem like allies?

Like predators fighting over a still-dying piece of flesh?

Trying to discredit sexual repulsion as an impulse of evolutionary protection. Libertarians should be outraged. Your right to say NO.

Suddenly all the tradthots and cuckservatives think if you don’t want a particular race, you’re genociding them.

*Alabama hasn’t outlawed all abortion because the Pill is still dispensed to the ‘sexually active’. Because rape babies are fine but their hooker ‘mistress’ could tell the wife.

I hate these people

If you need to paint over something, start with colour by numbers.

Don’t take someone else’s art and go instant karma Marxist on it.

No “artist” would actually do that. Artists respect other works. R-type trash.

There’s a metaphor about our modern world in here somewhere.

They “hate” Western civilization but they wanna live here and enjoy the perks.

They won’t do their own thing. Far, far away….

In a similar vein?

The people who chop up antique books need to be burned at the stake, it’s the only way to be sure.

Like no, butchering knowledge in its pure form is not a sculpture, Sandra.

Cultured people hate you now. They want respect but disrespect history and heritage.

Cultures take time to develop and personally, to appreciate. The people who say “everyone is creative” are 10/10 cunts who shouldn’t have been encouraged as children. Trashing good things is expression sure but not art.

Same as those people selling off an antique book page by page.

It feels like the bad restoration people but intentional destruction of the superior culture.

They should be shamed. Brats who grew up with anti-social behaviour praised by bad parents/teachers.

You know those were wall doodlers.

If I flipped you the bird right now, it would certainly be a powerful emotive expression… but it wouldn’t be art.

Goebbel’s truth rebranded

“Illusory truth effect” wasn’t invented by (((academics))).
“The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”

https://marshlab.psych.duke.edu/publications/FazioBrashierPayne&Marsh2015.pdf

Oh, the irony of Nazi propaganda whitewashed for socialism.

And used to call others Nazis.
For Hitler’s Big Lie, no less.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie

“The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously”.

Crediting people in academia is important.

“According to Hitler, the “big lie” was a propaganda technique typically used by Jewish Marxists.”
Patently false, they say.

Where have they done that?

This is why you can show PC people all sorts of factual evidence to the contrary and they’re still thick, it really is like a cult. State ‘education’ cult. How many years do you need? One day historians will show all the PC adverts in our media like we see Soviet stuff now.

[They’re scared to show us most Nazi propaganda because they’ve ripped it off again for the present.]

Actually, a propaganda MOOC about modern PC propaganda would be amazing.

This is why slander’s illegal, by the way. On an individual level, repetition for gossip does damage.

The way to actually get the brainwashed to snap out of it is allow questions, increase dissonance and apply consequences for being deluded.

Common sense on leftpol, what the right needs

Never thought I’d see the day.

2,500 words.

This is a salt post. If you’re new, you might try to argue. This is cute.

You know the only reason the left has power over the young? The right refuses to discuss class issues.

They hand-wave the concerns of the poor, the realpolitik.

Because most of them are middle-class, like the chattering left, but rescind the ground out of supposed principle. The principle being cowardice. They’ll talk about race, sex, sexuality and so on like the left want them to. Never classism.

Huh.

As if everyone capitalist, whatever their job, is the fucking Monopoly man.

Check this privileged asshole. Poster boy of all men. And you let it happen.

Why do you think they still got a hate-on for Thatcher?

She knew, daughter of a grocer and didn’t ridicule the poor/proles for capitalist ambition.
She treated them like intelligent adults who wanted to work hard and do better.

This is surprisingly realistic on the obligations of gender and biological realities.

How is a woman supposed to simultaneously raise children (alone, so still bad for them) while earning a high-earning full-time wage sufficient for financial support of self plus dependents as well? Especially given how men have higher-paying roles in the first place, prior to conception? [motive or cause aside]

And were she to apply after being left with baby (punished and derided for trusting a weak man, my stars), what of the so-called motherhood penalty? The one that makes her a less attractive hire, first to fire (less time for corporate faux family drama, HR hates them) and less likely to get a promotion whatever the skill level? You’d have to be a total fool to think companies don’t factor all of this in. After childbearing, a woman’s work options ARE severely limited and her earning potential for herself is impaired, discussions of cause or blame aside. If capitalism had disabilities, that would be the biggest one. Whereas fathers can get more pay, more time off (covered by the single, unfairly) because it’s expected they aren’t the primary caregiver to their own child. I’d love to see studies on single fathers and earning potential but the SJWs won’t do them! Because then it isn’t about the women (and not even white women) but companies punishing responsible parents.

Child support or welfare, I wonder who should be held responsible for your loin meat.

Parental protections in occupational law are vital. States exist to make sure businesses don’t ruin the People and that includes dysgenic culling of the future population by active punishment of childbearing, the cultural risks to having kids are already high enough.

https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/9118a9ef-0771-4777-9c1f-8232fe70a45c/compendium—sans-appendix.pdf

And if men want to be primary caregiver, if they think it’s easy, I haven’t seen anything to suggest this damages the children if both parents are still a unit and supporting the child. That’s the business of the people in the marriage, not the State.

MRA types assume all women are upper-middle class with Daddy’s savings. Like the SJWs, that’s why both get so, so much wrong.
They’re out of touch.

The following inspired by

https://8ch.net/leftpol/res/120643.html#q126164

It’s hilarious that misogynists assume they’re on the right side of the bell curve a- when they can’t read it properly and b- they make basic bitch errors clear to anyone who can think three hypotheticals ahead. For example, assuming white women were the property (as has never actually happened, historically) of white men (their fathers or possibly brothers) then why would those relatives want the women mistreated? Why would they sell them like desert cowboys when all men even get emotionally attached to the wellbeing of their dogs? It just seems like rapists trying to justify their ‘consent’ hamstering with the notion it’s validated by the owner in a sales position… when white women would be the most valuable, globally, pricing them out of the market, were it to happen. Finally, the recent universal suffrage of men would be torn down and slavery or servitude to pay off debts brought back. Well, plenty of men have Fight Club style debts on car leases, carousing parties and Ikea branded cardboard. If your sole argument for enslavement is IQ, look at the bell curve, most of the low IQ are male and already work in those lower tier manual roles, causing little movement in the labour market. It could be argued they’re already enslaved now, by practical virtue of their low IQ. It isn’t like you’re freeing up jobs for men (who don’t want to do them) and infertile women (by age or nature) would also be forced to work like men so the office couldn’t possibly be a 100% Mad Men montage sausage fest. All the glamorous jobs would go to the highest IQ i.e. not you and the majority of works (busywork) would disappear, the thing about a minority of workers producing the most? Assuming you actually wanted meritocracy and the best man or woman for the role. Men wanted worker’s rights for a reason – they wanted it for themselves.
What do they expect to rest on, for those job roles, their winning personality? I mean, these idiots think it’s the worst of times for men. Fuck grand-daddy gored on barbed wire, his grand-daddy dying down the mines crushed by debris with black lung hindering any escape, his being pressganged and dying a slow painful death of syphilis – women not humouring your bullshit HURTS. These guys think the modern times oppress them when it actually keeps them alive (with the threat of nuclear war) to consider blogging a job and blame women for their weakness on an information hub they waste on porn addiction. Porn is the opiate of the idiot masses.
The Peter Pan immaturity that conflates taxes for labour and fun for “rights” to an imaginary Pleasure Island discussed on the internet to troll them.
Some HR harpy may pay taxes but do they work? Who’s paying for the abortion clinics these wannabe manwhores wanna fill up with their ‘stealthing’ bullshit? Where in the human rights law does it say other-caused orgasms?
They also imply homemakers aren’t workers, which is abject crap. Deadbeats tend to be male because they don’t want to put in the work raising a family, being a Patriarch so they dump the contractual obligation of their gender role after making the most expensive ‘mistake’ (actually investment) characteristic of mature adults i.e. making a child. They knew sex made babies and didn’t get a vasectomy beforehand. What hypoagency? Are women really responsible for your case of the wandering penis now?
If women couldn’t inherit despite longer life and their own earnings, property rights wouldn’t exist for over half the
population, not including low IQ men who’d likely be stripped too. So it’s a fundamentally classist thought experiment and screws over their fellow man the most. If suffrage were based on paying taxes, a sensible position, then all the libertarians and corporate men couldn’t vote for betraying the nation, even if they were billionaires. Again, a sensible position. Suffrage is inherently nationalist, look at how white women voted in droves for Trump to protect their families.

The enemy using a good system doesn’t make that system the enemy. Your ancestors died for that position, you think they didn’t have good experience of what happened without them?

Deadbeats are a ghetto concept, it’s rare for a white man to have such r-select inclinations but they try to normalise this. Show me deadbeat populations by race. It should be larping like a rapper or something.

What’s normal for other races in whatever continent shouldn’t be normalised or (god forbid) celebrated for white people.

All they have is ad hominem for the average woman, if you ask for citations of their Muh Studies and ‘logic’. If they had such an issue with whores they’d make actual prostitution (inc. hardcore porn) illegal. Yet they ignore all the realities they don’t like e.g. porn addiction/mental issues, bachelorhood/lifespan, divorce/male re-marriage, paternal age/literal autism, and call women the emotional snowflakes who hate science.

Why aren’t there more women on their team? Big mystery. Guess they’re jealous too.

And gatekeeping the right wing, philosophy of sexual cooperation, segregated by sex, is totally feasible.

But Emotional Intelligence isn’t real, guys. Apparently big-brained men can’t figure out, as a sex, how to do it, so it cannot be real. This is science. This isn’t just a bunch of autists complaining about empathy.

Let’s be clear, snowflaking isn’t sex-specific, it’s an IQ range. For one Trigglypuff there are a thousand guys ragequitting their keyboard because you like a different phone or think a certain car manufacturer is over-rated. At least Triggly had some higher bloody attempts at priorities.

Men stereotypically bicker about the most pointless of things and act like it’s so deep.

Are we supposed to pretend we don’t notice?

Bring back duelling and the gobby lefty will mysteriously go extinct. As will black crime gangs.

They’re allowed to box with gloves, that might kill them, but not fight for their principles under agreed rules?

They don’t even specify landmass, racial composition or national IQ average for their thought experiments.

If utopia were a graph, a couple are important legends. What are you controlling, what do you measure?

Libertarian cuck tier “errors”, like ignoring what’s happening with the billions of swarming parasites populating the rest of the world – and feeling entitled. Like pop! we magically get to a land of no history and genetic competition.

That’s only a thought experiment if you’re a moron.

Would only the sons and daughters of the rich be recognised as having natural rights they’re born with?

You know, like the right of kings?

But they won’t dare bring up eugenics, because that would lead to a discussion of declining male quality too. The old coots were right, we do need a good war… or smarter abortion/contraceptive efforts.

Caring for the fate of your group (i.e. its fitness because evolutionary competition exists) does not imply caring for the individual entitlement feelz of everyone IN said group, presently. The current generation is nuclear ashes as far as low time preference planning is concerned.

Hey, I promised salt. All women are brutal thinkers, we just can’t acceptably say it (unless you want people singing songs about witches when you die).

We’re all trying to come up with some grandiose plan (one by one, how smart) that replaces a monarch’s wisdom and even has a cultural tier replete with aristocrats (in a democracy, in all but name) – all without discussions of class, IQ, culture/quality…

and wonder why it doesn’t work?

Muh Social Darwinism from actively anti-natal genetic suicides is tragic and ironic and I love it. You don’t want your genes in the future but sure, you “care”… like the socialists who tax evade!

They’re actually taking advice on how to form a healthy family unit and Patriarchal masculinity – from gay guys!

No wonder women laugh at you, who’d respect someone who thinks THAT is a good idea?

Do you want a world where Oscar Wilde wannabes can fuck your brother and call it trad?

Assuming it’s genetic and you believe in evolution (big ask, I know), nature has culled those people from the gene pool for solid reasons. Let them paddle in the brown-tinged hot tub in peace.

The hidden bisexuals, however, are a threat.

How does a person go through this loop of circular irrationality a thousand times for various forums and never figure it out?

>women are selective, it’s just evolution, they can’t help it
>why don’t girls like me? must be their fault, women r dumb

You can’t rationalise your way out of evolution but they try.

Tier: Sexual selection.
Outcome: rejection.

>women shouldn’t be able to accuse men of rape, lol don’t believe women
>how did Rotherham happen? why did nobody believe them?

Literally protecting rapists (unless Muslim) and would probably claim rights to access a rape baby, over rights to a lead payment. Are they rapists? Are they enablers?

Why don’t women want them?

Rape is the only way they can reproduce. Your forefathers knew this and carried out the death penalty. No bros before hoes. It was missus before sissies.

Think of it in terms of property rights. If I grew drugs in your garden without your permission and tried to sell that land, keeping all the profits. Bastards are an illegitimate exchange. The baby was made with an egg that didn’t belong to you, in a growing machine that also did not legally belong to you. It’s theft of fertility.

Otherwise, I can drill for oil on their land. If consent doesn’t exist, drafting returns.

The reason they hate the Brahmin class, the typical Hipster Joe Goldbergs of the world running everything from a modern art gallery, is that they’re a decadent aristo class who usurped the role of the rightful inheritors by blood.

That’s your real problem, isn’t it?

Was leaving your racial kinfolk of the British Empire truly worth your precious melting pot?

Take a good, hard look.

Would this have happened if you’d stayed with your race over multiculturalism mark 1, the pre-European pilot test or at least installed a King? You slag off monarchy but there’s one benefit. Kings don’t care about getting people to vote for them.

Instead you have rule by aristo-acting Jews. You must be so proud.

The Muh Ashkenazi Verbal IQ thing is just cultural Stockholm Syndrome at this point.
Who owns academia, who does the tests, who excludes the majority of white people?

Jung’s critique of Freud for ‘Jewish Psychology’, Jews of any stripe are not the human prototype.

It’s gone from frogs in palaces to banker toadies. Huge difference, huh?

Especially from our perspective, watching from their sewer as we filter their Third World shit.

Look at national debt under the British Empire versus now and repeat after me: Land of the free!

It is possible to vote wrong. Your working class great-grandpa might’ve been a socialist for the ‘right reasons’ but that doesn’t make the consequences of the voted party’s actions any less severe. Now America is fast becoming Little China, look at new immigrant flows.

A lot of the people new to right-wing ideas are experiencing bastardizations, pollutions with leftist assumptions and this includes “history was just the same as now, but the present is totally different, new and only getting worse”.

I question.

Psyops?

We know they have research profiles. Why not?

Alongside “people are all the same and ignore HBD, all class differences are a social construct but the oppression of class is totally real when we, your betters, deign to officially notice it”.

Like, isn’t it ultimately class-privileged to work in journalism?

I wonder.

Some universalism in whites dates back to our ancient tribal history. Why treat close genetic kin like shit, that would fly against inclusive fitness? We wouldn’t have survived the Ice Age. Not to be confused with pathological altruism’s out-group universalism. The bad faith try to draw a false equivalence, trying to make it a thought-terminating cliche so you cannot discuss the first, drowned out by accusations of the second.

There are misogynists in power in America, that’s correct, they’re Jewish culturally who consider women the spawn of Lilith. Orthodox Jews are the most woman-hating group in the world, moreso than Muslims. Why else try to turn white women into actual whores? Then get white men to cheer it, like the presence of camera equipment (thanks Edison!) makes it less shameful? There is a class of misogynists running the ‘rape culture’ but hardly a white Patriarchy and they also prey on little white boys. Look at all the crimes swept under the rug dating back to Old Hollywood. Whites wanted Prohibition to reduce crime, and this actually worked, so what did the Jews do? Under-mine it. What vice precedes most degeneracy, please?

I digress.

You can’t discuss society without class, America, it’s the fundamental way power is used, abused and accumulated.

TLDR: America’s stubborn refusal to discuss class is why it’s a moral cesspool. 

The ultimate problem is very simple, in an increasingly high IQ-demanding civilization:

What does America do with its low IQ?

Most of those happen to be male, fuck your feelings.

Virginia US abortion openly infanticide

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/30/ralph-northam-virginia-governor-defends-bill-allow/

I don’t recall the Nazis ever doing this.

“Your body your choice” is sound libertarian logic.

However, once born, it isn’t in your body anymore.

(And different races have different gestation times, Africans are the shortest).

If an infant is viable externally, even on machines (the date gets lower as technology improves) the abortion becomes evil. If these people were intellectually honest, argued in good faith and had any interest in morality beyond their selfish desires.

Big Pharma buys and sells body parts. Buy from the hospital, the parents donate it for free or it goes missing, claiming it’s been cremated. They sell the parts online to “researchers”.

As covered and previously linked also, they can use aborted tissue and circumcised foreskin tissues in some dermal fillers.

We live in an era of happy infanticide and parental “rights” for rapists.

How progressive…ly insane.

This is why lawyers go first.

nb (Early abortion always existed historically in rape cases, we don’t mean those. You consented to the sex, you knew babymaking could result in a baby or you’d have done oral).

Pot smokers have sicklier babies

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16458631
“If men smoked marijuana 11 to 90 times in their lifetime, there was a 15% decrease in infant birth weight (P = .03); if this increased to more than 90 times, there was a 23% decrease (P = .01). Timing also played a role.”
“Women and men who smoked in the past 15 years, had 12% (P = .04) and 16% (P = .03) smaller infants, respectively.”

This is why ((they)) want to legalize.

Such a change in one generation is huge news.

Related

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15343228

Paternal age increases pregnancy failure and miscarriage rate in IVF