TOLD YA SO
but race is a social construct?
What if I identify as Jewish? Do I get reparations?
TOLD YA SO
but race is a social construct?
What if I identify as Jewish? Do I get reparations?
Based on : “How many kids a woman wants with you shows her respect for your masculinity.
One or two kids by IVF and C-section? She hates your guts, pack a suitcase. Tiger Moms are hell in divorce court, ask reddit redpill and MGTOW forums. If she doesn’t want 4-7 kids, she isn’t traditional. If she pretends to change her mind after marriage, divorce her before the first kid, it’s easier. Try to void it.
1 to 2 kids is literally postmodern lawyercunt numbers. They also delay by like 7-10 years then act surprised when menopause means they don’t have more kids. Wake up to this stunt. Like Dog Moms.”
There needs to be an express crime for reproductive future faking. Cluster Bs do it. Too many traditional men and women fall for it. Kinda like breach of promise.
I suspected there’d be a link so I looked it up.
300% divorce risk post-IVF.
Now some sources later try to back track and say this has been ‘debunked’. It has not. Why?
They used a Danish study i.e. all white people. For both.
HOWEVER, two whites are not representative of MOST couples seeking IVF. It’s mixed race, like Anna Bey and her Arab Asian.
They have a higher failure rate for IVF, as I’ve proven in the past, Asian women have the highest IVF fail rate, compared to English women at least.
(They have fewer quality eggs, as r-types).
Obviously the medical places providing this ‘service’ at great expense will deny the divorce risk shooting up, so don’t trust any IVF negative ‘debunkings’. Look at the samples used and how representative they are of who ACTUALLY seeks the treatment, especially in UK and USA.
“One-fifth, or 20 per cent, ended up separated or divorced 16 years after undergoing the fertility treatment, according to the findings.”
So 1/3 to 1/5? Hardly much better despite statistical ironing, is it?
Divorce isn’t an option for the barren in Biblical times. No get-out clauses, stop picking infertile women. The Lord is punishing you. Getting frivorced is what Boomers do. In sickness and in health is Biblical.
“When both partners’ age, education and partnership status was factored in, no difference in the risk of relationship break-up was found.”
In this Danish study, what they didn’t look at? Race. Known to predict divorce.
If it weren’t for C-sections, narrow-hipped Asian women in particular would die in childbirth. Mother Nature’s telling you no.
You’ll need to get on the rice cookers’ cases eventually.
“Nearly all groups saw population gains this decade and the increase in the Two or More Races population (referred to throughout this story as the Multiracial population) was especially large (up 276%). The White alone population declined by 8.6% since 2010.”
The manosphere is a psyop or Youtube would’ve shoahed them by now.
“….Coupled with the 4.1 million respondents who identified as Asian in combination with another race group, such as White or Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, the Asian alone or in combination population comprised 24 million people (7.2% of the total population).
The Asian alone population grew by 35.5% between 2010 and 2020. In comparison, the Asian in combination population grew by 55.5%.”
The future of America is Chinese invasion because your men are cucks.
Statistically, mudsharks are not the problem here, are they?
Who could it be? Who could need to take some personal responsibility?
Those are honeypots you’re being targeted by. There’s billions of them and tens of millions of you white men in that fertile age group. Wake UP. Smells like genocide. You’re being targeted for replacement.
The browning out of American pioneer stock. Any race that chooses to do this to themselves, deserves to be wiped out frankly. It’s genetic suicide but with a slice of Biblical adultery.
So far we only have median or regression to mean proof in mixed blacks but that will change.
“The study was on bastards born of German women who were raped by US troops during occupation at the end of World War 2, and looked at their IQs.”
Yeah they never mention this.
Too much IQ difference is noted between white men and women. Women have a higher average in all races. It’s medically impossible for a lower IQ white woman to give birth to a much higher IQ white man. That isn’t how the mutations work. Even regression to the mean literally works the opposite way, like supermodel kids being bland looking. Look at Lily Rose Depp compared to her mother in her prime. No comparison, the mother is hotter. Why? JD’s ~1% mixed genes fucked it up, too much genetic noise.
National IQs are usually more accurate than student studies unless the country cheats. Compare urban to rural then, like with China.
“Because the hybrids are intermediate in BOTH GPA and PVT score – but whites score higher on PVT and lower on GPA than Asians. And the W/A hybrids were below the whites but above the Asians on PVT, and above the whites but below the Asians on GPA.”
The data is not clear cut and certainly not in favour, unlike how it’s claimed by self-cuckolds.
Just look at the mental health of the kids.
The limit on eggs is now 55 years so …. the infertile women from the clot shot will have options, sadly.
So the delay tactic of the Ting Tongs won’t work anymore, LOL.
By definition, two species cannot breed (naturally, don’t @ me with IVF ‘struggles’). It’s been found genetically before that speciation is increasingly occurring between the modern human races. This happens to all races and is how species are formed.
“Far from established fact” it’s literally the Darwinian meaning of the term. If you misuse it, you are just wrong.
Two races? Yes. I’m hardly shocked at the race denialism. The proof is right there, you are wrong.
I’m not shocked the hybrids died out, likely from infertility or childbirth deaths.
It’s been well known there was interbreeding in the edges of Europe.
However, notably, they are the ones who DIED aka the most unfit. Nobody seems to be mentioning they were abnormal. Or we wouldn’t have found them in a mass grave, abandoned. By BOTH sides of kin. (Parents still abandon their ugly children.)
Why do they use black photos, when none of the samples were African?
And when it’s a white person, why always a fug ginger? Why no brunettes or blondes? Too afraid to make em hot?
The cave in question is in the Siberia, Russian area, so this is one of the few places whites could’ve interbred with Asians.
No wonder they died out. Nobody else wanted them. It’s been proven humans prefer averageness aka in-group looks. Only the rejects go for exotics. It isn’t surprising at all they found such a girl, she was likely infertile or abandoned for looking too bizarre, there was no psyop brainwashing to mix in those days. Investing in the wrong mate was the death of your line (still is). The males are more likely fertile (simpler system) but less desirable (both being uncanny valley but the women looking like little girls, there will always be pervs).
“could’ve formed a vital part of survival“
they died before breeding….
you cannot be this stupid….
it’s a black swan against hybrid vigour, which has never been proven
maybe this is why the wages of sin is death, I always wondered about that in context of cultural separation
they must’ve known of such creatures, like tales of giants in the Bible
“The fact that there are different blood types is proof that we are not from the same species”
yes, it proves the modern existence of race, as God willed
“First problem is how they are defining species”
Speciation is why we’re not chimps
also proven in maggots
Genetically differentiated races and speciation-withgene-flow in the sunflower maggot, Strauzia longipennis
who named that?
Discussion of most topics within Evolutionary Biology begins with Darwin. Indeed, On The Origin of Species (1859) continues to influence much of modern Evolutionary Biology. Darwin viewed evolution by natural selection as a very gradual mechanism of change within populations, and postulated that new species could be the product of this very same process, but over even longer periods of time. This eventual process of speciation by natural selection is illustrated by a sketch drawn by Darwin in his personal notebook nearly 20 years before the Origin of Species was published (Figure 1). Here, he proposed a model whereby lineages form from their ancestors by evolving different characters over relatively long periods of time. Darwin indicated that species could form by the evolution of one species splitting into two, or via a population diverging from its extant ancestor to the point it was a new species. [DS: what mixing is attempting, in-group replacement*] Darwin’s insights into evolution were brilliant, especially in light of their being made in the absence of genetics. Indeed, ideas about heredity and the introduction of new genetic material via mutation were to come long after Darwin’s founding theories of evolution.
…Barriers to reproduction.
Under the commonly used ‘Biological Species Concept’ (Mayr 1942), the formation of new species involves the evolution of reproductive barriers to the production of viable offspring either before (pre-zygotic barriers) or soon after (post-zygotic barriers) mating. [no fertilization or later weak implantation] Thus, new species form when individuals from diverging [process, of outbreeding] populations no longer recognize one another as potential mates, or opportunities for mating become limited by differences in habitat use or reproductive schedules. In some cases, these pre-zygotic isolating mechanisms fail to prevent inter-breeding among individuals from separate populations. In these cases, viable hybrids may form, or the consequences of a successful mating attempt may end in failure, either due to the production of inviable zygotes or sterile, non–reproductive offspring. These diverse pre- and post-zygotic barriers are of great importance to speciation biologists because they determine how reproductively-isolated [read: disgusted] populations are from one another, which indicates how far along the often continuous process of speciation that populations are. For example, reproductive isolation [sexual selection/rejection] is weak in the early stages of speciation, but changes to strong or complete [like the visceral subhuman disgust studies, also aversion found in babies] in later stages of speciation (Figure 2). One or more of the many types of isolating mechanisms [freedom of association] may play a role in the evolution of species along a continuum (Figure 2). But how and why might reproductive barriers to genetic exchange evolve?
barriers > not impossibility
“inviable zygotes” bipolar weeb girl, anyone?
so IVF, if we cared about the good of the species, should literally be illegal – I’m sure medical tech helping morons was a plot point in Idiocracy
Nature is telling you No
People are so selfish. Nobody is entitled to reproduce. Ultimately, God set this order into place from a position of higher wisdom. Playing God does not go well – see their medical ailments, rare genetic conditions and mental problems. That could be another reason cave girl was abandoned by both tribes – insanity, they seek out isolated places. Asylums are generally comforting to the insane. The modern world does us a disservice by covering it up, would you really want to breed with certain people if you saw them off-med? Men should be most offended by this because do you wanna find out you mated with crazy once the kids show up? It’s like how ‘women’ don’t disclose they had plastic surgery. You’ll find out eventually. Is that really consent? We need informed consent re heritage and looks as part of marriage law.
Biological success is not having kids. It’s having grandkids. This is also seen in plants.
their own sentence debunks claims of vigour, which would be heritable by ALL descendants, not just one gen:
“F1 hybrids can outperform their parents in yield and vegetative biomass, features of hybrid vigor that form the basis of the hybrid seed industry.
The yield advantage of the F1 is lost in the F2 and subsequent generations. In Arabidopsis, from F2 plants that have a F1-like phenotype, we have by recurrent [artificial] selection produced pure breeding F5/F6 lines…”
misuse of pure, cutting out the runts by weeding out shows it is not a natural phenomena
The hybrid found in the cave was likely the product of rape, explaining the deadbeating and maternal rejection. Rape is common between races because it over-rides sexual selection…
This article analyzes the effortful control of automatic processing related to social and emotional behavior, including control over evolved modules designed to solve problems of survival and reproduction that were recurrent over evolutionary time. The inputs to effortful control mechanisms include a wide range of nonrecurrent information–information resulting not from evolutionary regularities but from explicit appraisals of costs and benefits. Effortful control mechanisms are associated with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the ventral anterior cingulated cortex. These mechanisms are largely separate from mechanisms of cognitive control (termed executive function) and working memory, and they enable effortful control of behavior in the service of long range goals. Individual differences in effortful control are associated with measures of conscientiousness in the Five Factor Model of personality. Research in the areas of aggression, ethnocentrism, sexuality, reward seeking, and emotion regulation is reviewed indicating effortful control of automatic, implicit processing based on explicit appraisals of the context. Evidence is reviewed indicating that evolutionary pressure for cooperation may be a critical adaptive function accounting for the evolution of explicit processing.
Incentives are everything. Stop saying degeneracy and other weakness is okay.
Man the fuck up.
Enabling weak character directly screws us all.
They wanted money?
In other news:
They want to control your curiosity. Part of the mentacide protocol.
Dya have a license to search for the holodomor?
But curiosity has also been associated with characteristics that reflect risk taking, stress tolerance and thrill seeking. This is how curiosity got its bad wrap as a mortal danger to felines.
They’re trying to replicate white characteristics so they can replace white people.
Doesn’t work – the genome is one whole thing, even junk DNA affects the rest.
We all know some people tend to be more curious than others. Supporting this, research shows some individuals experience curiosity more frequently or intensely than others. But is curiosity as a personality trait just a level of degree—more versus less?
They know it’s connected to IQ.
Everyone knows at this point.
Epistemic curiosity has been widely researched. This describes a person’s desire to acquire new information—such as facts, concepts or ideas—and bridge any gaps in their knowledge.
God forbid people seek out their own information and fact-check you asshats instead of blinding swallowing your shit.
Hey, didn’t you a-holes say “educate yourselves”?
I know it was a master-suppression technique but Ys and Zoomers actually listened.
People who show perceptual curiosity, on the other hand, try to maximise the sensory information they take in—like your friend who can’t stop looking around at anything and everything.
That’s called bad parenting. It’s connected to low IQ. That is perverting the definition of curiosity.
Curiosity = need for cognition.
This research can help us to understand how we can better harness curiosity in the real world, such as in work and educational settings.
Imagine your boss dialing up your arousal at work like a fucking thermostat.
Gaining knowledge in this way would be very different from just delivering a set teaching material.
Trying to cover IQ range differences in school, eh?
Maybe another century of pretending that works, might work?
If the teachers are so lazy, replace them with robots.
Current research has shown that the effects of curiosity on learning are even stronger for children from families with a low socioeconomic status.
Idiots are less likely to zone out if you jangle keys, can confirm.
“The fornix is part of the limbic system.”
So it’s an r/K thing.
Need for Cognition, Intelligence, and Aging
This study examined the constructs of need for cognition and intelligence (using the constituent
crystallized and fluid abilities that comprise overall intelligence) in relation to one another and over aging. Fifty young-old adults (54-69 years old) and 55 old-old adults (70-92 years old) were tested on a variety of measures, of which need for cognition, digit symbol (a measure of fluid intelligence), and vocabulary (a test of crystallized intelligence) were identified as outcome variables. The results suggest that need for cognition is significantly correlated to crystallized intelligence, need for cognition remains stable over aging, and fluid intelligence is best predicted by age.
They want to brainwash your kids out of all instincts for self-preservation.
“The study, led by Professor Elinor McKone, examined the “other-race effect,” a phenomenon
they made up
noticing things means you brain is WORKING
in which people have difficulty telling apart individuals of a different race to their own.”
This is why you don’t go on Third World foreign holidays, btw.
Unless you want them going off age 18 and turning up dead in Thailand with their false sense of security finally burst.
Kids need more bonding time with BOTH parents (no deadbeat dads), the oxytocin will offset the propaganda.
“The other-race effect can have serious real-world consequences,” Dr. Dawel said.
“For example, inaccurate cross-race eyewitness testimony has contributed to wrongful criminal convictions, passport misidentifications and even magazines mistakenly illustrating stories with a picture of the wrong person.”
That isn’t serious so they’re lying.
The team is now working on developing new training methods to reduce the other-race effect in adulthood.
That doesn’t sound ominous at all.
They’re still only studying the women. Like women self-impregnate.
Can’t have the guys knowing all the DNA damage of soy, wheatgrass, HGH, etc.
Look at diet and bone marrow, duh.
[inc. freedom of association].
Pro-pathological altruism and demographic suicide.
If something happens throughout society, you needn’t indoctrinate kids in its existence in school.
An exclusive category with no exclusions is an illusion, it doesn’t exist.
If you can’t say what it isn’t, it’s unfalsifiable.
I wonder if this might be oppressive to a race, therefore invalid because if the concept of racism itself is racist, there’s also no such thing.
From an academic paper covered previously. That quoted is the indisputable fact, unless you deny Darwin.
Lefties are the real Creationists.
If Darwin were taught in schools, nobody would fall for equalism.
Oh, the crime of being an unwanted fetus.
Make an update for the next election, someone.
e.g. Humans are greedy bastards never to be trusted versus Social engineering is good and public sector workers deserve better pensions than the taxpayer.
Violence is wrong, it’s against democracy versus Won’t do as we say? Prison! No? We’ll shoot you!
You must be tolerant versus “Social Justice” is noble to destroy you.
Genocide is wrong versus You don’t deserve to live in peace.
We celebrate diversity versus White people don’t belong here.
If you hurt them, that’s evil versus if they hurt you, it’s okay when they do it.
Published by The Jewish Publication Society of America.
Isn’t that all of the publishers?
This is why you read the publication information.
GREEK AND ROMAN CONCEPTS OF RACE
During the nineteenth century a peculiar rigidity was given to the conception of race through the application of somewhat hastily formed biological theories. One or another of the current hypotheses on heredity was deemed an adequate or even necessary explanation, and by any of them racial characteristics became determined, fixed: race was an unescapable limiting condition….
If by a peculiar rigidity you mean the concept of Darwinian evolution, sure.
Hastily formed biological theories is an oxymoron.
Theories are very well developed and Darwin used many species, all applied well on his taxonomy.
Now DNA (the ‘gene’ is a Darwinian theory) has been proven to exist so… he was right.
Genetic distance is very real, as real as concrete.
He theorized genes and now we can measure them.
There is no way to deny this without a gross denial of evolution itself.
“determined, fixed, limiting condition”
This is literally DARWINIAN INHERITANCE.
Biological determinism is 100% fact.
Two Asians cannot give birth to a European.
One Asian and one European cannot give birth to a European or an Asian. Their hybrid mongrel, much like a liger, will tend toward infertility and genetic disease. This includes psychiatric disease.
This even applies to cross-breeding plants and the associated fertility issues that entails. Former perennials can lose the ability to reproduce naturally. There is also a unique risk of weakness to disease and vitally, the parental unique DNA is lost.
You will not spontaneously mutate into a chimp.
“By the mating of two different breeds, a new organism can be produced with hybrid vigor. The hybrid vigor or heterosis is the tendency of the crossbred animal to exhibit the qualities superior to either parent. In animals, cross breeding is used to increase the production, longevity and fertility.”
False, a myth, even in dogs. Mongrels have many medical issues.
“exhibit the qualities superior to either parent”
Statistically false, due to regression to the mean.
We have extensively tested this in children, they are the mean of their parents.
“This chapter explores the likelihood of unintended effects from diverse methods of genetic modification of plants and animals (see Operational Definitions in Chapter 1). Specifically, it discusses unexpected outcomes of breeding methods used to develop a food crop or strain and unexpected or unintended effects recorded in the scientific literature.”
Novel gene combinations arising from the genetic manipulation of existing genes through conventional breeding techniques may introduce unintended and unexpected effects. However, through the breeder’s selection process, the genetic lines that express undesirable characteristics are eliminated from further consideration, and only the best lines—those that express desirable characteristics with no additional undesirable agronomic characteristics, such as increased disease susceptibility or poor grain quality—are maintained for possible commercial release. Although plants and animals produced from conventional breeding methods are routinely evaluated for changes in productivity, reproductive efficiency, reactions to disease, and quality characteristics, they are not routinely evaluated for unintended effects at the molecular level.
The clearing doesn’t happen in animals.
Cross breeding is known to be dangerous. If Hybrids had vigour they wouldn’t need that deliberate culling process.
In animals, their performance outcomes would be greater than the sum of their parents.
This never happens.
In humans, this would include IQ past both parents. Again, this never happens. We have plenty of negative evidence debunking this lie. At this point, it is a lie to make money.
They’re playing God.
I guess if race doesn’t exist then the so-called Holocaust only happened to white people?
If they really want to claim there’s no such thing as race, there’s no such thing as a Jew.
So they have no group-level complaints.
Waiting to be a father is irresponsible, imagine my shock.
“The records showed that children born to men aged 45 and over had a 14% greater risk of premature birth, low birth weight and being admitted to neonatal intensive care compared with babies born to younger fathers.”
Geriatric fathers, yes.
If you’re past middle-age (36-7 in men) and old enough to be a grandfather.
“Infants born to men aged 45 and over also scored lower on the Apgar newborn health test, and were 18% more likely to have seizures compared with infants born to fathers aged 25 to 34 years, according to the study in the British Medical Journal.
Why not state all the findings, including compared with <25?
Boomer readership, that’s why. 60 is the new 40 though, sure.
For women, the risk of gestational diabetes was greater when they had children with older men.”
Paternal age as a medical risk factor is long known, I’ve posted on it.
“This is something else to take into consideration,” he said. “There are potential risks with waiting. Men should not think that they have an unlimited runway.”
Why isn’t male fertility and issues like impotence mentioned in biology class? Men deserve to know, it’s important life planning. Modern men don’t realise their fertility is dropping steeply until they eventually go to conceive or get a random sperm count for other reasons.
I’d go so far as to call it a public health issue.
They are not fully informed, the information is withheld from them. Where’s the full consent for that wait, if they don’t understand what it might entail?
Obviously the man commenting on the study tries to downplay it but other studies I’ve posted didn’t find mild differences, in some cases extreme (such as psychiatric risk) and that’s without looking at whether the child is mixed-race, that includes the risk even further. Good luck getting that published.
“increases in health risks might have across populations as paternal age continues to rise.”
If it’s a risk across a population, it is also a risk for the individuals within it, showing up his earlier weasel words about ‘individuals’ to be a lie. You don’t have medical complications as a population, it’s personal.
“When I talk to couples about health risks, I use the lottery as an analogy,”
You use a con about people who can’t do maths to… lie to people who can’t do maths.
“Even if your risk for something goes up 10-20%, the absolute risk for an individual
Hear that gentlemen?
Who gives a shit about your individual risk going up by 20%? Not this guy! He’d rather not offend you but let you slowly become infertile because, by the time you figure it out, you’ll be powerless to do anything about it. White men need to have fewer children, as other Guardian articles have informed us.
You aren’t entitled to oppressive white male fertility.
The researchers calculating risk across the field (here a part of gerontology) know more maths than the doctors downplaying it.
“Eisenberg and his colleagues suggest changes in the DNA of older men’s sperm might explain their findings.”
Berg-berg-berg-berg et al.
“The concern is backed up by previous work, including a Harvard study last year that found births through IVF fell as the fathers’ age increased.”
IVF isn’t magic.
“Studies have shown that advanced paternal age is associated with negative health behaviours such as smoking and frequent alcohol consumption, obesity, chronic disease, mental illness, and sub-fertility,” she writes, adding that all are linked to health problems in newborns.”
Sub-fertility, which many clueless men have and they don’t care to warn you about.
It’s almost like men evolved to have children while they were healthier.
From the BMJ article itself:
“Though the effects of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes have been extensively studied,
can’t blame women, credits on that excuse are maxed out
research on the impact of older fathers on the health of offspring has been limited mostly to the risk of congenital disease.345678
we’re scared of offending old guys with money
The high number of male germ cell divisions in aging fathers has been proposed to increase the risk of autism, genetic abnormalities, psychiatric morbidity, and neoplasia in offspring, but recent studies have also suggested a potential paternal effect on perinatal morbidity.691011121314
I didn’t call my article Old fathers, sick babies for nothing.
Can’t get sicker than dead or disabled.
This passes down the germline so one bad breeding decision will affect all their offspring’s fitness too (I think the children will eventually sue for epigenetic damages, on poor lifestyle choices prior to conception as well).
I’ve love to see a study comparing older fathers with younger and recording sexual history (partners and diseases) because you know that has an effect. A medical effect. They’re too chickenshit to do it (and record the same in women but paternal factors into their sperm donation are more likely modified by those behavioural factors, his baby-making factory is the testes area so its prior health and the delivery vehicle’s are especially important).
One common explanation arises from the epigenetic changes that occur within spermatocytes; specifically modifications to histone and DNA methylation in spermatozoa of older men. These alterations occur in regions of the genome that are responsible for several diseases in offspring.15 Disruption of histone methylation in developing male germ cells might be a precursor to aberrant embryonic and placental development, with studies suggesting that paternal imprinting of aging could affect both fetal growth and maternal health during pregnancy.”
Degenerate DNA gets so offended when people stop filtering about it.
No prizes why they didn’t quote this part.
I wonder if their boys (because paternal factors would be stronger to another male) are more or less effeminate than the average? Again, they don’t dare do that study.
Paternal imprinting, that’s a nice word for degeneration on a genetic level.
At least they’re acknowledging men age, I suppose.
Looking at non-Guardian approved science:
“Studies of human populations and animal models suggest that a father’s experiences such as diet or environmental stress can influence the health and development of his descendants. How these effects are transmitted across generations, however, remains mysterious.”
I’m guessing the sperm.
Just a random, wild guess.
“Epigenetic changes do not alter the DNA sequences of genes, but instead involve chemical modifications to either the DNA itself or the histone proteins with which DNA is packaged in the chromosomes. These modifications influence gene expression, turning genes on or off in different cells and at different stages of development. The idea that epigenetic modifications can cause changes in gene expression that are transmitted from one generation to the next, known as “transgenerational epigenetic inheritance,” is now the focus of intense scientific investigation.
For many years, it was thought that sperm do not retain any histone packaging and therefore could not transmit histone-based epigenetic information to offspring. Recent studies, however, have shown that about 10 percent of histone packaging is retained in both human and mouse sperm.”
So …more lying to men.
Get obese, it’s fine! Drink like a fish! Your kids will be fine!
Our ancestors never knew that vice… had a price.
They didn’t have iPhones, we’re so much wiser than them.
“The LORD is slow to anger, abounding in love and forgiving sin and rebellion. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation.‘”
What does that even mean? Nature can’t see what you’re doing.
Trust the “experts” who profiteer from fertility treatments and hate white men!
“”Furthermore, where the chromosomes retain histone packaging of DNA is in developmentally important regions, so those findings raised awareness of the possibility that sperm may transmit important epigenetic information to embryos,” Strome said.”
Wait, could rednecks be even smarter if they drank less?
Was Prohibition, pro-white?
““These findings show that the DNA packaging in sperm is important, because offspring that did not inherit normal sperm epigenetic marks were sterile, and it is sufficient for normal germline development,” Strome said.”
Sinner father, no grandchildren?
That is a divinely calculated revenge, all their paternal investment wasted.
“The presumption of female defect is confirmed in a letter to the Ugarit king about a woman who failed to produce any children for her husband after an extended period of time. The letter relates how the husband used the infertility as an occasion to take a second wife. It was only when he failed to produce children with the second woman that he was then considered to be the defective one”
“While monogamy was probably the norm in antiquity,”
louder for cucks at the back
“childlessness was one of the most common reasons that a man would resort to a bigynous marriage”
But God is punishing them, going around that in favour of dysgenic reproduction is a sin.
Women could divorce infertile or impotent men under the Catholic church, it was so important.
“The goal is to analyze how the chromatin packaging changes in the parent,” she said. “Whatever gets passed on to the offspring has to go through the germ cells. We want to know which cells experience the environmental factors, how they transmit that information to the germ cells, what changes in the germ cells, and how that impacts the offspring.”
I doubt it’s for the greater good.
Could addiction be genetic?
Lawyers are celebrating just thinking of it.
By demonstrating the importance of epigenetic information carried by sperm, the current study establishes that if the environment experienced by the father changes the epigenetics of sperm chromosomes, it could affect the offspring.”
A few others, while I’m here.
Your genes affect your nose shape.
Ya gotta have chutzpah to believe the science.
“The colour of a person’s hair is one of the most heritable features of their appearance, with studies on twins suggesting that genetics explains up to 97% of hair colour.”
Race explains 100%. Subrace especially.
They’re right that hair colour isn’t a matter of sexual preference …but race is.
““Pigments are far more than just cosmetic – they are important for the immune system and play a role in many diseases,” said Spector. “Understanding the genetics could lead to new therapies.”
They tried that with African heart medication, it was taken off the label.
They’d rather let black men keel over and die than admit they’re genetically different.
K-shift in mice:
“Intriguingly, the experience of winning appeared to leave an imprint on the mice, making them more assertive, even when their brains’ were no longer being artificially controlled. They were found to be more combative in a second scenario in which they competed to occupy the warm corner in a cage with an ice-cold floor.”
So you see, they can’t let men grow up. There’d be no politically useful regression then.
Buy stock in pajamas.
They can knock out that part of the brain too. They don’t mention this. This makes me suspicious.
“The findings, they suggest, could have applications in understanding a variety of psychiatric conditions where people exhibit overly dominant behaviours, or lack motivation to compete socially.”
Psychopathy and depression (or r-selection, as a trait).
Psychopaths are immune to depression. What makes others sad, makes them mad.
The study itself has nothing to do with “alpha” as Americans consider it, an alpha is never single in biology but part of a breeding pair.
The study is really about psychopathy in the extreme form (genetic engineering, useful for the military) and social dominance in prosocial, milder forms (K) which cannot be undone (even in GE mice) as a natural maturation process. Its absence of activation (say, from the amygala circuits) could explain effete males. Again, they gloss over that.
Genes influence subject choice.
Isn’t that a huge confound that should be studied?
And why force children to study languages then? Isn’t that oppression when they could study something else?
“Birney warns that the findings do not imply that it is possible to predict a student’s subject choice, or achievement, from their genome.”
trans. Don’t look in the race box, please, don’t look in the race box. I don’t want to get the sack.
“As schooling and other factors vary greatly from person to person it is unlikely that genetics is the dominant factor in A-level choice.”
The likelihood was calculated.
“The scientists found that this was indeed the case, with 50-80% of subject choice down to genetic influences.”
Academic ability …. not IQ?
How is GPA not a reliable proxy for IQ, on that point?
GPA is basically just the PC term for IQ. Mathematically.
Scrambling for nurture excuses, are we?
Fails to account for IQ, social mobility isn’t equally possible.
The participant with a higher visual acuity gets the pilot position.
Unless they’re seriously suggesting we should dole out positions and their responsibility (legal) on the incompetent? That sounds more like a curse on them.
The simpler explanation (Ockham) is that health impacts the ability to strive and lower IQ causing poorer lifestyle choices compounds the ill health as a permanent feature.
How to truly test this?
Within a race, some castes do poorly and this is both represented in lower IQ scores than their genetic kin as well as “poor” health. Where one caste e.g. Western-living Indians, represents a middle-class (as in the UK), white people are at a distinct disadvantage – disproving and debunking the privileged status hypothesis. So-called “positive discrimination” or reverse racism, leads more opportunities to the class who least deserve it (financially stable) purely on the basis of race (racist).
Race isn’t a qualification. To treat it as any sort of meaningful status opposes the Race Relations Act.
The BBC should’ve been stripped of taxpayer funding the moment it refused to hire white people, the taxpaying majority. As a point of fact, how come they’re allowed to turn a private profit? Isn’t that also a monopoly?
You can’t study class and discrimination without classism but ah! They won’t do that!
How hard do white natives work to reach a given position, eh?
The question never published nor studied.
Who has it easier? It would be easy to study but I’ve seen nada.
Does meritocracy cease to apply if your skin has a certain level of pigment?
Is this the new coffee-coloured aristocracy? Reign of error.
When you hire someone on the basis of skin colour, you make everyone who looks like them look similarly incompetent. Who’s racist?
Public interest, equality in hiring/promotion/wages and all that.
Favouring one party is a direct oversight spurning the other.
Over-representation is treason. i.e. Should whites govern Africa?
Bias is scientifically proven, ruling over the outgroup impartially is impossible for all races.
Whose interests do they represent in practice? That would prove neutrality, if they also plugged white and poor causes. …No? Have they ever represented the majority …. in a democracy? Anything less is indeed treason.
It comes down to this: who pays the academic’s share of taxes for these divisive papers?
Are the poor working two or more jobs expected to slave away for those who write inciteful documents encouraging their oppression?
The Race Relations act looks like a tightening noose, year on year.
Freedom of association? Freedom of hiring/firing?
Freedom of productivity?
The gender wage gap (while it exists all over the place in varying directions) is a generally false question because it assumes you have more in common with your group demographically (sex) than your occupation – at WORK.
Work is a role, and this would logically lead to demanding the tall poppies be cut short.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. – Boetcker
Do you want a welfare state or not?
We need all the GDP we can get, ya blithering idiots.
The Bell Curve has already explained different performance in the same roles by IQ (or GPA) and the military has known for about a century.
If you want to crack open the can of worms, have at it.
It’s well known if that book came out today, the evidence would be undeniable (we have MRIs and genetics now).
Should we hand over all positions of power to a group of people purely based on how they were born?
How is that ANYTHING but a privilege?
A protected class is the new aristocracy.
If you want a democracy, a meritocracy, you don’t demand employers release CONFIDENTIAL PRIVACY DATA on other employees. Equality of outcomes is insanity, especially from those plugging diversity!
Ironically, it will become all about performance, and since certain groups
have lower-ranked performance, if you push this, they simply won’t be hired.
This will undo AA hiring. A company cannot afford to pay everyone top performer wages.
Category error – using the top wages as an anchor point, a norm, is statistically false.
If you want a cause, married people earn more than single people for the same work.
It’s known but you won’t see them bring it up because wifey poo likes to spend spend spend.
Singlism is a problem, where equal work is done, because of outdated notions of supporting a family like companies are a miniature welfare state. Bachelor men (including cohab) are screwed by occupational singlism more than women, because their jobs tend to compete with married men. I think that’s why manosphere types haven’t brought it up, because they can’t blame women when it’s intrasexual competition.
All fair competition is fair game under meritocracy though.