HIV cure was a lie

REALLY?

They wanted money?

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-teams-replicate-results-hiv-monkeys.html

REALLY?

In other news:

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-curiosity-brain-harness.html

They want to control your curiosity. Part of the mentacide protocol.

Dya have a license to search for the holodomor?

But curiosity has also been associated with characteristics that reflect risk taking, stress tolerance and thrill seeking. This is how curiosity got its bad wrap as a mortal danger to felines.

They’re trying to replicate white characteristics so they can replace white people.

Doesn’t work – the genome is one whole thing, even junk DNA affects the rest.

We all know some people tend to be more curious than others. Supporting this, research shows some individuals experience curiosity more frequently or intensely than others. But is curiosity as a  just a level of degree—more versus less?

They know it’s connected to IQ.

They KNOW.

Everyone knows at this point.

Epistemic curiosity has been widely researched. This describes a person’s desire to acquire new information—such as facts, concepts or ideas—and bridge any gaps in their knowledge.

God forbid people seek out their own information and fact-check you asshats instead of blinding swallowing your shit.

Hey, didn’t you a-holes say “educate yourselves”?

I know it was a master-suppression technique but Ys and Zoomers actually listened.

People who show perceptual curiosity, on the other hand, try to maximise the sensory information they take in—like your friend who can’t stop looking around at anything and everything.

That’s called bad parenting. It’s connected to low IQ. That is perverting the definition of curiosity.

Curiosity = need for cognition.

This research can help us to understand how we can better harness curiosity in the real world, such as in work and educational settings.

WTF.

Imagine your boss dialing up your arousal at work like a fucking thermostat.

Gaining knowledge in this way would be very different from just delivering a set teaching material.

Trying to cover IQ range differences in school, eh?

Maybe another century of pretending that works, might work?

If the teachers are so lazy, replace them with robots.

Current research has shown that the effects of curiosity on learning are even stronger for children from families with a low socioeconomic status.

Idiots are less likely to zone out if you jangle keys, can confirm.

“The fornix is part of the limbic system.”

So it’s an r/K thing.

https://agenetwork.phhp.ufl.edu/CLUFF.Edwards.UNDERGRAD.pdf

Need for Cognition, Intelligence, and Aging 

This study examined the constructs of need for cognition and intelligence (using the constituent
crystallized and fluid abilities that comprise overall intelligence) in relation to one another and over aging. Fifty young-old adults (54-69 years old) and 55 old-old adults (70-92 years old) were tested on a variety of measures, of which need for cognition, digit symbol (a measure of fluid intelligence), and vocabulary (a test of crystallized intelligence) were identified as outcome variables. The results suggest that need for cognition is significantly correlated to crystallized intelligence, need for cognition remains stable over aging, and fluid intelligence is best predicted by age.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-early-exposure-key-recognising-other-race.html

They want to brainwash your kids out of all instincts for self-preservation.

“The study, led by Professor Elinor McKone, examined the “other-race effect,” a phenomenon

they made up

noticing things means you brain is WORKING

in which people have difficulty telling apart individuals of a different race to their own.”

This is why you don’t go on Third World foreign holidays, btw.

Unless you want them going off age 18 and turning up dead in Thailand with their false sense of security finally burst.

Kids need more bonding time with BOTH parents (no deadbeat dads), the oxytocin will offset the propaganda.

“The other-race effect can have serious real-world consequences,” Dr. Dawel said.

“For example, inaccurate cross-race eyewitness testimony has contributed to wrongful criminal convictions, passport misidentifications and even magazines mistakenly illustrating stories with a picture of the wrong person.”

That isn’t serious so they’re lying.

The team is now working on developing new training methods to reduce the other-race effect in adulthood.

That doesn’t sound ominous at all.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-09-bone-marrow-piece-fertility-puzzle.html

They’re still only studying the women. Like women self-impregnate.

Can’t have the guys knowing all the DNA damage of soy, wheatgrass, HGH, etc.

Look at diet and bone marrow, duh.

Trotsky, pusher of the concept ‘racism’

http://www.amerika.org/politics/yes-leon-trotsky-invented-the-word-racism/

Implying that acting with free will is a bad thing.

[inc. freedom of association].

Pro-pathological altruism and demographic suicide.

If something happens throughout society, you needn’t indoctrinate kids in its existence in school.

An exclusive category with no exclusions is an illusion, it doesn’t exist.

If you can’t say what it isn’t, it’s unfalsifiable.

I wonder if this might be oppressive to a race, therefore invalid because if the concept of racism itself is racist, there’s also no such thing.

From an academic paper covered previously. That quoted is the indisputable fact, unless you deny Darwin.

https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v8n3/TOQv8n3Hamilton.pdf

Lefties are the real Creationists.

If Darwin were taught in schools, nobody would fall for equalism.

Oh, the crime of being an unwanted fetus.

Make an update for the next election, someone.

e.g. Humans are greedy bastards never to be trusted versus Social engineering is good and public sector workers deserve better pensions than the taxpayer.

Violence is wrong, it’s against democracy versus Won’t do as we say? Prison! No? We’ll shoot you!

You must be tolerant versus “Social Justice” is noble to destroy you.

Genocide is wrong versus You don’t deserve to live in peace.

We celebrate diversity versus White people don’t belong here.

If you hurt them, that’s evil versus if they hurt you, it’s okay when they do it.

Credit: cannot find source. Definitely not me.

Book: The Jews among the Greeks and Romans

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/58245
Published by The Jewish Publication Society of America.
Isn’t that all of the publishers?

This is why you read the publication information.

Funny –

GREEK AND ROMAN CONCEPTS OF RACE

During the nineteenth century a peculiar rigidity was given to the conception of race through the application of somewhat hastily formed biological theories. One or another of the current hypotheses on heredity was deemed an adequate or even necessary explanation, and by any of them racial characteristics became determined, fixed: race was an unescapable limiting condition….

If by a peculiar rigidity you mean the concept of Darwinian evolution, sure.

Hastily formed biological theories is an oxymoron.

Theories are very well developed and Darwin used many species, all applied well on his taxonomy.

Now DNA (the ‘gene’ is a Darwinian theory) has been proven to exist so… he was right.

Genetic distance is very real, as real as concrete.

He theorized genes and now we can measure them.

There is no way to deny this without a gross denial of evolution itself.

“determined, fixed, limiting condition”

This is literally DARWINIAN INHERITANCE.

Biological determinism is 100% fact.

Two Asians cannot give birth to a European.

One Asian and one European cannot give birth to a European or an Asian. Their hybrid mongrel, much like a liger, will tend toward infertility and genetic disease. This includes psychiatric disease.

This even applies to cross-breeding plants and the associated fertility issues that entails. Former perennials can lose the ability to reproduce naturally. There is also a unique risk of weakness to disease and vitally, the parental unique DNA is lost.

You will not spontaneously mutate into a chimp.

http://pediaa.com/difference-between-cross-breeding-and-gmo/#Cross%20Breeding

“By the mating of two different breeds, a new organism can be produced with hybrid vigor. The hybrid vigor or heterosis is the tendency of the crossbred animal to exhibit the qualities superior to either parent. In animals, cross breeding is used to increase the production, longevity and fertility.”

False, a myth, even in dogs. Mongrels have many medical issues.

“exhibit the qualities superior to either parent”

Statistically false, due to regression to the mean.

We have extensively tested this in children, they are the mean of their parents.

https://www.nap.edu/read/10977/chapter/5

“This chapter explores the likelihood of unintended effects from diverse methods of genetic modification of plants and animals (see Operational Definitions in Chapter 1). Specifically, it discusses unexpected outcomes of breeding methods used to develop a food crop or strain and unexpected or unintended effects recorded in the scientific literature.”

BACKGROUND

Novel gene combinations arising from the genetic manipulation of existing genes through conventional breeding techniques may introduce unintended and unexpected effects. However, through the breeder’s selection process, the genetic lines that express undesirable characteristics are eliminated from further consideration, and only the best lines—those that express desirable characteristics with no additional undesirable agronomic characteristics, such as increased disease susceptibility or poor grain quality—are maintained for possible commercial release. Although plants and animals produced from conventional breeding methods are routinely evaluated for changes in productivity, reproductive efficiency, reactions to disease, and quality characteristics, they are not routinely evaluated for unintended effects at the molecular level. 

The clearing doesn’t happen in animals.

Cross breeding is known to be dangerous. If Hybrids had vigour they wouldn’t need that deliberate culling process.

In animals, their performance outcomes would be greater than the sum of their parents.

This never happens.

In humans, this would include IQ past both parents. Again, this never happens. We have plenty of negative evidence debunking this lie. At this point, it is a lie to make money.

They’re playing God.
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special_issues/plant_genetic_breeding

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/16922/why-are-hybrids-infertile

I guess if race doesn’t exist then the so-called Holocaust only happened to white people?

If they really want to claim there’s no such thing as race, there’s no such thing as a Jew.

So they have no group-level complaints.

http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html

How long can they deny HBD?

Waiting to be a father is irresponsible, imagine my shock.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/oct/31/babies-born-to-older-fathers-tend-to-have-more-medical-issues

“The records showed that children born to men aged 45 and over had a 14% greater risk of premature birth, low birth weight and being admitted to neonatal intensive care compared with babies born to younger fathers.”

Geriatric fathers, yes.
If you’re past middle-age (36-7 in men) and old enough to be a grandfather.

Infants born to men aged 45 and over also scored lower on the Apgar newborn health test, and were 18% more likely to have seizures compared with infants born to fathers aged 25 to 34 years, according to the study in the British Medical Journal.

Why not state all the findings, including compared with <25?

Boomer readership, that’s why. 60 is the new 40 though, sure.

For women, the risk of gestational diabetes was greater when they had children with older men.”

Paternal age as a medical risk factor is long known, I’ve posted on it.

Their study.

http://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k4372

“This is something else to take into consideration,” he said. “There are potential risks with waiting. Men should not think that they have an unlimited runway.”

Why isn’t male fertility and issues like impotence mentioned in biology class? Men deserve to know, it’s important life planning. Modern men don’t realise their fertility is dropping steeply until they eventually go to conceive or get a random sperm count for other reasons.

I’d go so far as to call it a public health issue.

They are not fully informed, the information is withheld from them. Where’s the full consent for that wait, if they don’t understand what it might entail?

Obviously the man commenting on the study tries to downplay it but other studies I’ve posted didn’t find mild differences, in some cases extreme (such as psychiatric risk) and that’s without looking at whether the child is mixed-race, that includes the risk even further. Good luck getting that published.

“increases in health risks might have across populations as paternal age continues to rise.”

If it’s a risk across a population, it is also a risk for the individuals within it, showing up his earlier weasel words about ‘individuals’ to be a lie. You don’t have medical complications as a population, it’s personal.

“When I talk to couples about health risks, I use the lottery as an analogy,”

You use a con about people who can’t do maths to… lie to people who can’t do maths.

“Even if your risk for something goes up 10-20%, the absolute risk for an individual

doesn’t change

At all?

that much.”

Hear that gentlemen?


Who gives a shit about your individual risk going up by 20%? Not this guy! He’d rather not offend you but let you slowly become infertile because, by the time you figure it out, you’ll be powerless to do anything about it. White men need to have fewer children, as other Guardian articles have informed us.

You aren’t entitled to oppressive white male fertility.

The researchers calculating risk across the field (here a part of gerontology) know more maths than the doctors downplaying it.

“Eisenberg and his colleagues suggest changes in the DNA of older men’s sperm might explain their findings.”

Berg-berg-berg-berg et al.

“The concern is backed up by previous work, including a Harvard study last year that found births through IVF fell as the fathers’ age increased.”

Duh.

IVF isn’t magic.

“Studies have shown that advanced paternal age is associated with negative health behaviours such as smoking and frequent alcohol consumption, obesity, chronic disease, mental illness, and sub-fertility,” she writes, adding that all are linked to health problems in newborns.”

Sub-fertility, which many clueless men have and they don’t care to warn you about.

It’s almost like men evolved to have children while they were healthier.

From the BMJ article itself:

“Though the effects of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes have been extensively studied,

can’t blame women, credits on that excuse are maxed out

research on the impact of older fathers on the health of offspring has been limited mostly to the risk of congenital disease.345678

we’re scared of offending old guys with money

The high number of male germ cell divisions in aging fathers has been proposed to increase the risk of autism, genetic abnormalities, psychiatric morbidity, and neoplasia in offspring, but recent studies have also suggested a potential paternal effect on perinatal morbidity.691011121314

I didn’t call my article Old fathers, sick babies for nothing.
Can’t get sicker than dead or disabled.

This passes down the germline so one bad breeding decision will affect all their offspring’s fitness too (I think the children will eventually sue for epigenetic damages, on poor lifestyle choices prior to conception as well).

I’ve love to see a study comparing older fathers with younger and recording sexual history (partners and diseases) because you know that has an effect. A medical effect. They’re too chickenshit to do it (and record the same in women but paternal factors into their sperm donation are more likely modified by those behavioural factors, his baby-making factory is the testes area so its prior health and the delivery vehicle’s are especially important).

One common explanation arises from the epigenetic changes that occur within spermatocytes; specifically modifications to histone and DNA methylation in spermatozoa of older men. These alterations occur in regions of the genome that are responsible for several diseases in offspring.15 Disruption of histone methylation in developing male germ cells might be a precursor to aberrant embryonic and placental development, with studies suggesting that paternal imprinting of aging could affect both fetal growth and maternal health during pregnancy.”

Degenerate DNA gets so offended when people stop filtering about it.

No prizes why they didn’t quote this part.

I wonder if their boys (because paternal factors would be stronger to another male) are more or less effeminate than the average? Again, they don’t dare do that study.

Paternal imprinting, that’s a nice word for degeneration on a genetic level.

At least they’re acknowledging men age, I suppose.

Looking at non-Guardian approved science:

https://phys.org/news/2018-10-documents-paternal-transmission-epigenetic-memory.html

“Studies of human populations and animal models suggest that a father’s experiences such as diet or environmental stress can influence the health and development of his descendants. How these effects are transmitted across generations, however, remains mysterious.”

I’m guessing the sperm.

….

Just a random, wild guess.

“Epigenetic changes do not alter the DNA sequences of genes, but instead involve chemical modifications to either the DNA itself or the histone proteins with which DNA is packaged in the chromosomes. These modifications influence gene expression, turning genes on or off in different cells and at different stages of development. The idea that epigenetic modifications can cause changes in gene expression that are transmitted from one generation to the next, known as “transgenerational epigenetic inheritance,” is now the focus of intense scientific investigation.

For many years, it was thought that sperm do not retain any histone packaging and therefore could not transmit histone-based epigenetic information to offspring. Recent studies, however, have shown that about 10 percent of histone packaging is retained in both human and mouse sperm.”

So …more lying to men.
Get obese, it’s fine! Drink like a fish! Your kids will be fine!

Our ancestors never knew that vice… had a price.
https://biblehub.com/numbers/14-18.htm

They didn’t have iPhones, we’re so much wiser than them.

“The LORD is slow to anger, abounding in love and forgiving sin and rebellion. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation.‘”

What does that even mean? Nature can’t see what you’re doing.

Trust the “experts” who profiteer from fertility treatments and hate white men!

“”Furthermore, where the chromosomes retain histone packaging of DNA is in developmentally important regions, so those findings raised awareness of the possibility that sperm may transmit important epigenetic information to embryos,” Strome said.”

Wait, could rednecks be even smarter if they drank less?

Was Prohibition, pro-white?

“These findings show that the DNA packaging in sperm is important, because offspring that did not inherit normal sperm epigenetic marks were sterile, and it is sufficient for normal germline development,” Strome said.”

Money shot?

Sinner father, no grandchildren?

That is a divinely calculated revenge, all their paternal investment wasted.

Detour:

https://thebiblicalworld.blogspot.com/2011/01/childlessness-and-bible-2-defective.html

“The presumption of female defect is confirmed in a letter to the Ugarit king about a woman who failed to produce any children for her husband after an extended period of time. The letter relates how the husband used the infertility as an occasion to take a second wife. It was only when he failed to produce children with the second woman that he was then considered to be the defective one”

LOL

“While monogamy was probably the norm in antiquity,”

louder for cucks at the back

“childlessness was one of the most common reasons that a man would resort to a bigynous marriage”

But God is punishing them, going around that in favour of dysgenic reproduction is a sin.

Women could divorce infertile or impotent men under the Catholic church, it was so important.

“The goal is to analyze how the chromatin packaging changes in the parent,” she said. “Whatever gets passed on to the offspring has to go through the germ cells. We want to know which cells experience the environmental factors, how they transmit that information to the germ cells, what changes in the germ cells, and how that impacts the offspring.”

I doubt it’s for the greater good.

Could addiction be genetic?

Lawyers are celebrating just thinking of it.

By demonstrating the importance of epigenetic information carried by sperm, the current study establishes that if the environment experienced by the father changes the epigenetics of sperm chromosomes, it could affect the offspring.”

Could?

A few others, while I’m here.

Your genes affect your nose shape.
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11616

Ya gotta have chutzpah to believe the science.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/apr/16/scientists-discover-dozens-of-new-genes-for-hair-colour

“The colour of a person’s hair is one of the most heritable features of their appearance, with studies on twins suggesting that genetics explains up to 97% of hair colour.”

Race explains 100%. Subrace especially.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0100-5

They’re right that hair colour isn’t a matter of sexual preference …but race is.

““Pigments are far more than just cosmetic – they are important for the immune system and play a role in many diseases,” said Spector. “Understanding the genetics could lead to new therapies.”

They tried that with African heart medication, it was taken off the label.

They’d rather let black men keel over and die than admit they’re genetically different.

K-shift in mice:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jul/13/scientists-discover-brains-neural-switch-for-becoming-an-alpha-male

“Intriguingly, the experience of winning appeared to leave an imprint on the mice, making them more assertive, even when their brains’ were no longer being artificially controlled. They were found to be more combative in a second scenario in which they competed to occupy the warm corner in a cage with an ice-cold floor.”

So you see, they can’t let men grow up. There’d be no politically useful regression then.
Buy stock in pajamas.
They can knock out that part of the brain too. They don’t mention this. This makes me suspicious.

“The findings, they suggest, could have applications in understanding a variety of psychiatric conditions where people exhibit overly dominant behaviours, or lack motivation to compete socially.”

Psychopathy and depression (or r-selection, as a trait).
Psychopaths are immune to depression. What makes others sad, makes them mad.
The study itself has nothing to do with “alpha” as Americans consider it, an alpha is never single in biology but part of a breeding pair.

http://scienceblogs.com/clock/2009/08/23/no-more-alpha-male/

The study is really about psychopathy in the extreme form (genetic engineering, useful for the military) and social dominance in prosocial, milder forms (K) which cannot be undone (even in GE mice) as a natural maturation process. Its absence of activation (say, from the amygala circuits) could explain effete males. Again, they gloss over that.

I noticed.

Genes influence subject choice.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jun/16/a-level-subject-choice-is-strongly-influenced-by-genes-scientists-say

Not IQ?
Isn’t that a huge confound that should be studied?
And why force children to study languages then? Isn’t that oppression when they could study something else?

“Birney warns that the findings do not imply that it is possible to predict a student’s subject choice, or achievement, from their genome.”

trans. Don’t look in the race box, please, don’t look in the race box. I don’t want to get the sack.

“As schooling and other factors vary greatly from person to person it is unlikely that genetics is the dominant factor in A-level choice.”

The likelihood was calculated.

“The scientists found that this was indeed the case, with 50-80% of subject choice down to genetic influences.”

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jul/23/genes-influence-academic-ability-across-all-subjects-latest-study-shows

Academic ability …. not IQ?

How is GPA not a reliable proxy for IQ, on that point?

GPA is basically just the PC term for IQ. Mathematically.

Race and ill health

Scrambling for nurture excuses, are we?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25526/

Fails to account for IQ, social mobility isn’t equally possible.

The participant with a higher visual acuity gets the pilot position.

Unless they’re seriously suggesting we should dole out positions and their responsibility (legal) on the incompetent? That sounds more like a curse on them.

The simpler explanation (Ockham) is that health impacts the ability to strive and lower IQ causing poorer lifestyle choices compounds the ill health as a permanent feature.

How to truly test this?
Within a race, some castes do poorly and this is both represented in lower IQ scores than their genetic kin as well as “poor” health. Where one caste e.g. Western-living Indians, represents a middle-class (as in the UK), white people are at a distinct disadvantage – disproving and debunking the privileged status hypothesis. So-called “positive discrimination” or reverse racism, leads more opportunities to the class who least deserve it (financially stable) purely on the basis of race (racist).

Race isn’t a qualification. To treat it as any sort of meaningful status opposes the Race Relations Act.

The BBC should’ve been stripped of taxpayer funding the moment it refused to hire white people, the taxpaying majority. As a point of fact, how come they’re allowed to turn a private profit? Isn’t that also a monopoly?

You can’t study class and discrimination without classism but ah! They won’t do that!

Wonder why.

How hard do white natives work to reach a given position, eh?

The question never published nor studied.

Who has it easier? It would be easy to study but I’ve seen nada.

Does meritocracy cease to apply if your skin has a certain level of pigment?

Is this the new coffee-coloured aristocracy? Reign of error.
When you hire someone on the basis of skin colour, you make everyone who looks like them look similarly incompetent. Who’s racist?

Public interest, equality in hiring/promotion/wages and all that.

Favouring one party is a direct oversight spurning the other.

Over-representation is treason. i.e. Should whites govern Africa?

Bias is scientifically proven, ruling over the outgroup impartially is impossible for all races.

Whose interests do they represent in practice? That would prove neutrality, if they also plugged white and poor causes. …No? Have they ever represented the majority …. in a democracy? Anything less is indeed treason.

It comes down to this: who pays the academic’s share of taxes for these divisive papers?

Are the poor working two or more jobs expected to slave away for those who write inciteful documents encouraging their oppression?

[groans in HBD]

The Race Relations act looks like a tightening noose, year on year.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/oct/11/new-law-employers-reveal-race-pay-gap-figures

Freedom of association? Freedom of hiring/firing?

Freedom of productivity?

The gender wage gap (while it exists all over the place in varying directions) is a generally false question because it assumes you have more in common with your group demographically (sex) than your occupation – at WORK.

Work is a role, and this would logically lead to demanding the tall poppies be cut short.

You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. – Boetcker

Do you want a welfare state or not?

We need all the GDP we can get, ya blithering idiots.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

The Bell Curve has already explained different performance in the same roles by IQ (or GPA) and the military has known for about a century.

If you want to crack open the can of worms, have at it.

It’s well known if that book came out today, the evidence would be undeniable (we have MRIs and genetics now).

Should we hand over all positions of power to a group of people purely based on how they were born?

How is that ANYTHING but a privilege?

A protected class is the new aristocracy.

If you want a democracy, a meritocracy, you don’t demand employers release CONFIDENTIAL PRIVACY DATA on other employees. Equality of outcomes is insanity, especially from those plugging diversity!

Ironically, it will become all about performance, and since certain groups

have lower-ranked performance, if you push this, they simply won’t be hired.

This will undo AA hiring. A company cannot afford to pay everyone top performer wages.

Category error – using the top wages as an anchor point, a norm, is statistically false.

If you want a cause, married people earn more than single people for the same work.

It’s known but you won’t see them bring it up because wifey poo likes to spend spend spend.

Singlism is a problem, where equal work is done, because of outdated notions of supporting a family like companies are a miniature welfare state. Bachelor men (including cohab) are screwed by occupational singlism more than women, because their jobs tend to compete with married men. I think that’s why manosphere types haven’t brought it up, because they can’t blame women when it’s intrasexual competition.

All fair competition is fair game under meritocracy though.

This won’t end well, idiots

MRAs are stupid as the SJWs, they’re a form of SJW.

You cut off the vital support for the natalism (healthy courtship and family structures) every society needs.

Most men in the world hate you because of your race! For historical reasons, no negotiation out of this one.

How many is that? Let’s visualize!

Consider soil erosion and the dwindling arable land. Lotta people gonna starve.

And “white” is a very small number of genes swirling around, all recessive!

No Singapore brides for you! (Debt/GDP is also higher than America, idiots).

 

Where all the white people at?

Consider the IQ implications too.

That’s incredibly optimistic. I know plenty of non-whites claiming white on the census.
And Russians are technically not white, based on genetic distance. Neither European nor Asian. That’s a quarter or so down instantly.

And half these figures for the men you seek to cooperate with, who still might want to kill you.

National interests, which you might not care about, but many do!

Ah, America, deluded as usual.

https://www.reference.com/world-view/ratio-men-women-world-population-5afd68eb596fbafb

“The world ratio of men to women is estimated to be 1.017:1. As of today, the world’s male population was 3,776,294,273, while the female population was 3,710,295,643.”

Race > Sex for identity politics.

Statistically, if you are being intellectually honest. Your common culture has nothing to do with the average male of Saudi Arabia or Sub-Saharan Africa. Your WEIRD culture is decidedly racial, not even all white, WASP! The decidedly North-Western European genome! Your work ethic has little in common with an Italian, male or female!

You are already a minority. The world minority, by race.

850k/2 = 425, minus 100 or so for the elderly or infant. (conservatively)

325 million white men of fighting age worldwide.

To say nothing of willing. Most modern men are cowards.

And you think the women are your problem?

Not the almost 7 billion strong racial outgroup and growing??

Sure, they won’t try to steal the women either, where’s the precedent? I’m sure they’ll leave you alone, especially as they starve and you’re so successful and they outnumber you!

The Spartans did so well! You can totally take billions of angry hungry people that build the defense technologies you rely on, to sit around keyboard warrioring about middle-class Gender Studies majors!

(Nobody mentions their bachelor tax and subhuman status of unmarried men, treated like children).

http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

7.6 billion – 850k white = total N white people.

Then there are class factions, you don’t see upper-class white men having any problems getting work, no middle-class men wanna change this system or present with a strong impetus for Brotherhood collectivism! Which goes so well in China and India btw! No nepotism, totally meritocratic! No men left on the shelf in marriage markets there! And since when has a pan-White male union ever existed? Bloody warfare for millennia.

Oh but feminists are the only deluded ones, O.K.

You can never be questioned or wrong, but you aren’t stupid!

Your assumptions magically prove themselves, look at all your imaginary data and cherry-picked “studies” with no replication or concrete methodology!

All men R smart and all girls R dumb, treehouse cooties ew.

Just ignore the left side of the bell curve, one whole full side of the IQ bell curve.

That’s so smart of you, like the SJWs, if you ignore a problem, it’ll disappear!

Because when you look at homelessness, mental illness and crime rates, it was all magically the fault of women! SOMEHOW.

But women deny responsibility for themselves, don’t they guys?

Men would never do that….

Men would never have the hypoagency to deny the murder, rape and theft rates among their sex, would they? They’d never say NAMALT!

They’re red pill! They’re STRONG.

SATIRE INCOMING:

Men would never cry victim. Like in child support cases. It just doesn’t happen. They don’t deny their gender role to provide as patriarchs. They aren’t postmodernist hippies.

Men deserve respect for breathing, even if they act like children. How dare you shame a Peter Pan into growing up! Magical Freudian penis rules. Europe must respect every African male that treads on this soil, right? Don’t be sexist, like Sweden! Open borders because men never do evil or dishonest things?

Let alone the mathematical majority of them!

Men are more capable than women, so should be held to a fitting, higher standard, right?
No?

And men never rape other men, that’s absurd!

Men cannot be victims. Either that or their super-secret “body language” meant they really wanted it because men are the world’s whores, don’t you know? Always willing with anyone at anytime for anything. Because body language is a science, like palmistry. Even a baby can consent if it gives you special body language like crawling on you or SMILING – Saint Epstein will argue in his legal defence. All rape accusations against a man are false, the stats be damned! We demand to be taken seriously, we aren’t blinkered and ridiculous at all. It’s against the laws of physics for men to be victims of stalking, harassment or “real” rape and if you say any different or hold men to any adult standard of behaviour in the First World, well, you’re a misandrist (but misogyny is just, like, science, duh).

And in the olden days, men never died without reproducing, it just never happened.

Men don’t need impulse control, property rights will magically enforce themselves! I can leave my car unlocked in a diverse male area, I can trust my fellow men! I can let men sleep on my couch without paying rent because Brotherhood! It isn’t parasitism, if a man is doing it!

Men are forced to reproduce. It was an Oops! baby, a mistake! They didn’t know sex made babies! They can’t be held responsible for their reproduction! What did you expect them to do, get a minor simple outpatient procedure to ensure it’s impossible?

BUT men make better parents even though women only exist to make and raise babies. Women evolved to care for children but somehow, men are better at it. Men are better at everything, LOL, duh! Women evolved for no skills, are simple as children (but only female children) and a barren woman is useless to the economy, why are the WW2 women laughing at us?

It isn’t like girls and women pass the exact same blinded examinations men do! The IQ difference is definitely bigger than the statistical chance of 5%, especially once you’ve selectively rigged the results by taking out all the predominantly male retards. That’s just science. You hate science if you complain about systemic bias in calculation.

The tests should be different and the same depending on our feelings.
We don’t know the difference between equal and fair.
But women are hypersensitive and emotional. They make rape jokes about us and sausage gags all the time. Making a man feel bad should be illegal, it’s all that snowflake’s fault! They need to go to their safe space but Gent’s clubs are totally valid. No, none of us are gentlemen and weirdly proud but other men aren’t allowed to impose standards on us either! We’ll call them sexist, too!

And the test must be rigged if they do well! Except military tests, then rigging is good. Except we want the female draft. We don’t hate women, we just want them to go overseas knowing they’ll get murdered or captured and raped by foreigners, cuck!

The highest ideal of manliness is an r-selected, alcoholic, drug-abusing, nomadic manwhore. The Sexual Revolution is unquestionable, ignore antibiotic resistance, paternal abandonment and damaged pair bonding ability. We R da best 5eva. Men can never do better than this and should be shamed for trying.

Damaged goods only applies to women, ignore player burnout. Nothing behind that curtain.

BUT fathers shouldn’t be obligated to co-parent, to spend time with their child as a mentor like the old days to ensure its mental health! When a woman fobs her kid off on the nanny, she’s a heartless monster. When a man fobs his child off on a nanny, he’s being responsible and should be given a medal!

Women have a responsibility to breed like a sow but not men! Because that’s how babies happen! Lesbians!
And furthermore, men have a right to continue their genetic line regardless of quality (this isn’t r) and don’t need to pay a cent while the woman is investing biologically in two decades of labour, totally helpless.

It’s Darwin, men must spread their seed (citation needed), I’m sure the kids will survive.
No men in history weren’t absolute, amoral sluts. None were celibate. None died virgins. No great men weren’t crazed rapists like Genghis Khan. What a great man that slaughtering rapist was.

This is the ultimate good for society, which just happens to coincide with my sloth. It isn’t a sin, I am very lucky. This is not a privilege. I’d gladly swap with my ancestors to see more women in dresses.

It’s a coincidence I can act like a big baby and society enables this.

The problem is WOMEN.

I’m oppressed by all the free lust, free welfare, free schooling, free sympathy for my sin!

I hate that my vices bring no consequences, really! I want a Patriarchy, just like you, fellow conservative!

Stop being degenerate? What? It’s my right!!! How dare you! Next you’ll want me to pay for my sexual partner’s birth control! Oh, in Patriarchy?

Well, no, I’d just be raping your Christian teenage daughters and haha, you couldn’t stop me… what’s… what’s the rope for…?

And you’d totally have to pay for my “girlfriend’s” abortions. Not me. You pay for my orgasms. Because I exist.

Prostitution is wrong because then sex has a price paid for by me, person in receipt of service! It belongs on the taxpayer, that’s the moral choice!

It’s never been easier to survive in all of human history but this world sucks because there aren’t busty under-age Japanese girls servicing me under the table at every meal. Women are so entitled to want a husband. But they should find one or they’re defective.

I don’t wanna save for my own pension like a sucker.

We are not the luckiest and laziest excuses for men ever! Wastrel is still a word that totally has meaning now everyone is doing it, so it’s moral! It’s legal too so it mustn’t be antisocial!

Also gay is evil but lesbians are holy. Obviously? It’s just obvious porn does no damage. Fuck neuroscience.

Government largess is only evil when single mothers are doing it, when men hold the baby, they deserve all the money in the world. In. The. World. Or you’re sexist. And I’ll cry at you online but rape threats are funny, totally not to be taken seriously. You’re so weak, we don’t bully anyone. I’d totally say this to your face in public. Twitter is a public space.

R-selection can magically be contained to one sex despite being a sexual selection process between two sexes in societies.

We need traditional marriage and only traditional marriage – except I can cheat without being stoned to death, have bastard children and leave if I get bored without being sued for abandonment. That’s what commitment means. I’m such a catch, why does no good woman want me?

Women are females but male is insulting. Girl is normal and a compliment but if you call me boy, I can attack you. The law says whatever I want it to.

We don’t believe in “male”, it’s a social construct to tell us to man-up like we’re adults or something biological. But there are two sexes and we’re totally different. But we’re tired of double standards, women should be treated equally to men, it isn’t fair. We’re so rational. Ignore the suicidal ideation, all men should be like us. I’d choose this life again. Pass my antidepressants and testosterone pills. This is normal.

SATIRE OVER. Back to the demographic.

And I’m sure there won’t be any anti-white traitors in the white or non-white male group either.

In your dreams.

Where you all happen to have an IQ of 128-135, as you claim online.
But cannot do basic arithmetic like that up top, somehow.

You are not entitled to a waifu, you gotta earn it. That’s the red pill. This economy sucks for everyone. You are not special. Life really is that hard.

The First World is paying for the older generations’ “entitlement” and the rest of the world, with a reduced population. It isn’t the women. You say it’s white women going on welfare while admitting out the other side of your face that the birth rate is next to nothing. Okay, ban birth control? Marry? No? I think you’re too chicken to admit the other factors.

This is biodiversity 101 and you fail. If you think either sex can afford to rentseek and be spiteful, you can’t do maths.
The SJWs ignore it because they want to kill Western Civ, idiots. They don’t just hate white men, it’s women too! Rotherham? 

Misogyny makes no sense, it’s still your suicide and also that of your genetic line (kin).

You sure showed those SJWs, giving them exactly what they want!