Explains the persecution complex.
Explains the persecution complex.
It’s classic quantity over quality.
Superior is a quality question, referring to the unit of the individual in biology.
Like average IQ by group or nation.
Look at long-term cultural achievements, in-group virtues/vices, ability to withstand systemic shocks as a group and brain size of the male (larger frame) by race, over time, among other things.
Sexual dimorphism, for instance, is a wonderfully Darwinian predictor of genetic quality of the group.
It also impacts fertility, as health….
Are Individualistic Societies Less Equal? Evidence from the Parasite Stress Theory of Values
[This is how you don’t do a study on cultural differences.]
It is widely believed that individualistic societies, which emphasize personal freedom, award social
status for accomplishment, and favor minimal government intervention, are more prone to higher
levels of income inequality compared to more collectivist societies, which value conformity, loyalty, and tradition and favor more interventionist policies.
And tradition doesn’t mean, what you think it means i.e. nepotism, grandpa never retires.
The results in this paper, however, challenge this conventional view.
Great, nurture people.
Drawing on a rich literature in biology and evolutionary psychology, we test the provocative Parasite Stress Theory of Values,
because low fitness =
which suggests a possible link between the historical prevalence of infectious diseases, the cultural dimension of individualism-collectivism and differences in income inequality across countries.
Specifically, in a two-stage least squares analysis, we use the historical prevalence of infectious diseases as an instrument for individualistic values, which, in the next stage, predict the level of income inequality, measured by the net GINI coefficient from the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID). Our findings suggest that societies with more individualistic values have significantly lower net income inequality.
Make your mind up.
White man bad or good.
The results are robust even after controlling for a number of confounding factors such as economic development, legal origins, religion, human capital, other cultural values, economic institutions, and geographical controls.
Oh, I brought screencap.
Shit, a diagram of people who wash their hands after.
Could this have something to do with infection? or…. IQ?
The Parasite Stress Theory of Values, which was first introduced by Thornhill and Fincher
(2014), proposes that regions with high levels of parasitic stress were more likely to naturally
select personality traits such as xenophobia, neophobia, ethnocentrism, and, more generally,
values that disregard the well-being of out-group members, including those at the lower
end of the economic ladder. Traits like xenophobia and neophobia, for instance, not only
reduce economic transactions between groups and across-regions, but reward conformity
and obedience toward traditional order and discourage novelty
As a result, societies with high degree of pathogenic stress were more likely to develop cultural traits associated with collectivist values (Fincher et al., 2008) that view negatively ideas that can potentially threaten the established social norms.
Societies too thick to believe germ theory contaminate their water supply and get infected?
To this day?
See they wanna admit the collectivism but spin it.
From an evolutionary standpoint, these behavioral strategies were mechanisms to stop the spread of
The required amount of immigrants is zero and mercantile transportation didn’t exist for millennia.
The Chinese seemed happy to swarm America as soon as it was legal.
Where did black death come from? Which continent?
Theoretically, then, the effect of individualistic values on income inequality is ambiguous.
Since the individualism-collectivism component loads positively on values such as individual freedom, opportunity, achievement, advancement, recognition, and loads negatively on values such as harmony, cooperation, and relations with supervisors, Gorodnichenko and Roland (2012) note that, broadly defined, individualism emphasizes the values of personal freedom, affective autonomy, and achievement. In that sense, individualistic cultures award social status to personal achievements such as innovation, discoveries, or artistic achievements with high social status (Gorodnichenko and Roland, 2012).
How terrible. /s
A stylized empirical fact that emerged from a series of follow-up studies is that developed and industrialized nations are more likely to be associated with greater prevalence of individualism whereas less developed, traditional and agricultural societies are more likely to preserve collectivistic values (Hofstede et al., 1991).
“less developed” = low IQ
maybe the culture led to the economic prosperity and industry? big if true?
What is this a map of, children?
a) places people want to live
b) places white people live
c) cultures that aren’t shit-holes
d) cultures where capitalism is technically allowed
e) countries that won’t suffer comparatively in the next collapse
f) all of the above.
It’s F, for Fuck China, rates should’ve gone up decades ago.
You read the rest.
Autonomous (individualistic) cultures are ones where people are seen as autonomous and independent entities. In such cultures, people are encouraged to cultivate and express their own preferences, feelings, ideas, and abilities, and derive meaning from their own uniqueness. Embedded (collectivist) cultures, on the other hand, are ones where people find meaning by identifying with the group, participating in a shared way of life, and striving towards shared goals.
Where do you want to live?
In short, do you want to suppress, oppress and smother the smart, gifted people?
You can say Japan and China are smarter until you look at their pension plans.
I’ve posted about them.
Israel’s IQ is 95 on a good day.
Southeast Asians (Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Borneo)
about right, almost a whole deviation down
South Asians (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, the Gulf states, the Near East, and Turkey)
Yes, let us fear them.
Eastern and Southeastern Europe is 95
Hispanics in America 89
I’m scared, are you?
Welfare, the important metric.
Why count Asia as two? Why all the lies? Why?
You count all Europeans?
Individualism, Culture and Entrepreneurial Opportunities*
brb altering history
The present paper evaluates the effect of living in an individualistic society on
entrepreneurial opportunities, using cross-country data from the GEDI. Individualism
is one of the five cultural dimensions proposed by Hofstede (2001) and it is considered
by intercultural psychologists the main dimension of cultural variation. For individualism is a cultural trait that emphasizes freedom and rewards one’s own personal
achievements, it increases the propensity to open new businesses and realize own ideas,
despite the possibility of failure. So as to prevent reverse causality between individualism and entrepreneurial activity, we use the frequency of blood types and other
genetic data as instruments. The data show a positive and highly significant effect
of individualism on entrepreneurship, even after controlling for education, religion,
fertility, unemployment, the ease of doing business, networking, among others.
Economists try to pretend the race-culture connection isn’t important but….
Look at ‘lil Venezuela down there, I wonder what will happen to them?
This is why Trump doing the trade war is a genius move. THIS.
In countries with more individualistic cultural characteristics, they have a predominance of individuals seeking potentially better opportunities to conduct an initial business, as well as characteristics with a greater perception of entrepreneurial opportunity. Similarly, Figure 5 suggests that countries with
more individualistic cultures often have greater opportunities to start a business. As for example, Canada, United States, Great Britain and Australia. The ten countries with the highest GEI index in 2017 were: the USA, Switzerland, Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Australia, the United Kingdom, Ireland and the Netherlands.
I wonder what THEY have in common.
1950s GDP: not race (only) but cultural individualism.
Therefore, it measures the quality of entrepreneurship, as we are concerned with the quality of entrepreneurship: the entrepreneur driven by opportunities that generate commercial success. The definition of entrepreneurship that we will adopt is related to job creation and growth through innovation.
aka GDP, real ingroup gains
No, Asians can’t take over capitalism. That can literally never happen.
They’re collectivists, they get crony capitalism, they’ll fuck it up.
We just have to survive that.
I wonder what this figure indicates…
You’ve got me.
Yes, this is definitely my opinion.
My educated opinion.
As you can see, I am very jelly.
Thus, the most appropriate model for the analysis of the effect of entrepreneurial activity on individualism is that of column (5).
Considering the above-identified situation of a possible endogeneity between the variables, instrumental fractional variables were included for the econometric analysis. This process requires variables that are related to individualism, but not to entrepreneurial activity.
This hypothesis is sufficient so that the causal relation can be established in the proper direction. Thus, for individualism we use the blood distance of Mahalanobis and the pathogenic genes according to Gorodnichenko and Roland (2017). In table 2, the individualism and each possibility of instrument: distM-UK and mean of pathogens, which are, respectively, Mahalanobis blood distance between the country in England and the mean of the presence of the nine genes pathogens considered relevant to Murray’s individualist collectivist analysis: leishmaniasis, trypanosomes, malaria, schistosomiasis, filaria, leprosy,dengue, typhus and tuberculosis.
My opinion, clearly.
I magically altered their blood, to lie.
I can do that.
The relationship is negative, because it suggests that the closer to the entrepreneurial country, the more individualistic the culture will be.
Table 3 includes some more control variables, particularly related to institutions and their long-run effect on development. Precisely due to their persistence, it is important to separate the effect of culture from institutions as good as possible, although this it is a difficult matter and still an ample field of research (Gorodnichenko and Roland 2017; Spolaore and Wacziarg 2013)
I’m just jealous of cultures that enslave their children to make my phone.
Table 4 repeats our preferred estimation, the fractional probit instrumental variable model,
for a number of subsamples. On the one hand, the sample is divided into countries that
experienced European colonization and those that did not. The former may have suffered
a mixture of cultures that is not captured by the genetic data. Therefore, if any, we expect
the effect of individualism to be stronger and more precise in the latter subsample.
To sum up, we find remarkably few differences in the magnitude of the individualism index
across the estimations in tables 3 and 4. In fact, the point estimate is not statistically
different from the baseline regressions in table 2 and in all of the seven estimation do
we obtain a positive and significant effect of individualism on the opportunity to start a
The argument for muh civic nationalism, muh brain drain immigration is a pack of lies.
They are not the same as us.
The present paper evaluated the hypothesis that individualism can influence the entrepreneurial activity, accounting for cross-country differences in education, religion, fertility, unemployment, ease of opening a company and networking. The data shows a strong and remarkably robust relationship between living in an individualistic culture and entrepreneurship.
Things libertarians pretend to give a shit about.
The West is WEIRD – nobody else.
Although one should be careful in interpreting our results as causal, our estimates of fractional probit instrumental variable approach suggests a plausible interpretation of this relationship. We explored other potentially important channels in determining entrepreneurial activity.
The effect may potentially be confounded by geography, climate conditions, or through European colonization, as well as through persistent institutions, such as the risk of expropriation. In addition, the influence of the culture dimension of individualism was tested separately for each group of countries belonging to the OECD or not. It was concluded that the effects remained positive and significant, confirming the validity of the results and of the instruments.
Finally, the perceptions of the opportunity to start a business are different from society
to society, so the origin of these differences and their influences is important. Thus, this
article thus complements the studies on entrepreneurship (Pinillos and Reyes (2011), Liñán
and Fernandez-Serrano (2014), Dheer (2017), Doepke and Zilibotti (2014), Laskovaia et al.
(2017) and Nikolaev et al. (2018).
Ya snooze, ya lose.
Throwing this here.
and the spread is nice and geographical — west to east/north to south: the anglos and the dutch (and are the scandinavians there? i can’t tell), my long-term outbreeders, are the least corrupt — then, working upwards on the chart (i.e. towards more corrupt) you’ve got the belgians and french and spanish — crossing the line into the more corrupt zone you start to have poland and hungary and the czech republic, places on the border of the hajnal line and the medieval outbreeding project — and then you get up to italy and the ukraine and russia.
east asia is, of course, interesting with singapore, hong kong, and japan being some of the least corrupt, and china being way up by corrupt italy. need to work on figuring out east asia one of these days! (~_^)
Nobody looks at Asia.
We know about Africa and Europe, we all know at this point. For about a century, we have known.
The interesting thing now is Asia/Europe. Are you all too scared to look?
Look at voting patterns, this is important.
so, there’s definitely a connection between intelligence and corruption, but that’s not the whole story, otherwise china and russia and italy and korea wouldn’t be very corrupt at all.
maybe their IQ scores are as real as their college transcripts?
Muh model minority.
Cheating is illegal BTW. It’s fraud and theft from the worthy applicants who lost out (zero sum).
Teachers help too: racketeering.
one thing that the chinese, russians, and italians have in common (don’t know much about the koreans) is a longer history of inbreeding as compared to the english and the dutch (see mating patterns series below ↓ in left-hand column). the awesome epigone did find a correlation (0.44) between consanguinity and corruption, but like i said then, i’m betting that the correlation would be stronger if we could calculate something like degree+length-of-time inbreeding.
All trader nations. Merchants. Former merchant empires.
see also: Corruption: The Exception or the Rule?
The third piece of evidence is that the racial gaps have existed for a long time. In fact, based on the data from the tables above, the White/Black brain size gap doesn’t seem to have gotten any smaller during the 20th century.
Long before your 60s immigration acts.
The first thing to note is that brain size in the general population has a heritability of 87%. Thus, almost all the differences between individuals in brain size are caused by genes.
Secondly, we should note that racial brain size differences are present at, and even before, birth.
Keep blaming women though, that’ll help.
We need more direct studies like this. Gestation length and other variables must be accounted.
Menarche and other variables like WHR vary by race in the women too. More studies! MORE!
The manosphere is based on a myth of equalism, it was destined to fail.
Fourthly, racial brain size differences have been found all around the world. For instance, the Beals and Smith data set previously referred to features skulls from over 100 populations world wide. Many of the autopsy studies previously cited were done in East Asia, as were two of the MRI studies. This makes any gene independent cultural explanation less likely.
Fifthly, several studies have shown that mulattoes have an average brain size in between that of Blacks and Whites (Pearl, 1934; Bean, 1906). This finding has been established on multiple occasions and is what a hereditarian hypothesis would predict since mulattoes are half White and half Black genetically speaking.
Do studies for other mixes.
Sixth, many traits which tend to co-evolve with larger brains also differ racially in a way that mirrors the body size adjusted brain size pattern. Rushton and Rushton (2003) looked at 37 anatomical features which 3 textbooks on human evolution identified as tending to co-evolve in the hominid line with larger brains. For instance, larger pelvic size tends to co-evolve with brain size so that mothers can give birth to larger brained infants. Rushton then utilized 5 forensic anthropology textbooks to look at racial differences in these traits. These traits followed the East Asian>White>Black pattern in 25 out of 31 cases. The probability of this happening at random is .000000001.
WHR is important.
Follow the tag, there are racial differences in studies.
And East-Asian isn’t a race, at best it’s a sub-group, do more studies. Properly.
Asians fail more often on IVF, also posted about that.
Similarly, Rushton (2004) showed that, across 234 mammalian species, brain size correlates with longevity, gestation time, birth weight, litter size, age of first mating, body weight, and body length. Various studies have shown that each of these variables also differ between the races in a way that, based on what we find across the animal kingdom, would predict the body size corrected brain size differences we observe (Rushton, 1995; Templer 2006; Rushton and Templer, 2009;).
Longevity – must look at averages e.g. not Danes for all whites nor Japs for all Asians.
Gestation – we know this varies.
Weight – control confounds.
Litter size – look at natural rate of twinning.
Virginity loss is r-select, do not want.
Body weight – vague.
Length – we already know racial height. Still, add to the rest, I guess.
Thus, we have six lines of evidence all of which would be predicted by a hereditarian view on racial differences in brain size. While each line of evidence on its own may not be compelling, the combination of all six seems to strongly imply that racial brain size gaps are partly heritable.
It is worth noting that the racial brain size gaps are probably not entirely attributable to genes. Some authors, including Richard Nisbett, have plausibly argued that nutrition also plays a role. However, there explanations are not mutually exclusive, no environmental variables has been shown to account for the majority of the gap, and, as we have seen, there are many separate lines of evidence indicating that genes also play a role
A confound, in weight.
I suggest seafood consumption.
There is good evidence that the races evolved different brain sizes in response to climate. Specifically, various studies have found that a population’s brain size correlates with climate related variables. For instance, Pearce and Dunbar (2011) ‘s data set produces a correlation of .74 between a population’s brain size and its latitude. Similarly, Ash and Gallup (2007) found a correlation of .48 between the size of 109 fossilized human skulls and the latitude at which they were found. Further still, Bailey and Geary (2009) analyzed 175 skulls ranging in age from 10,000 years old to 1.9 million years old and found a correlation of -.41 between brain size and winter temperature and -.61 between size and latitude (larger brains were found in areas more distant from the equator).
How dare you use science.
The weebs might reee!
Lynn (2015) used Smith and Beals data set of 20,000 skulls from 122 populations to estimate that roughly 30% of the African-European IQ gap can be statistically accounted for by brain size differences. By contrast, brain size differences would actually predict an Asian-European IQ gap 35% larger than the one that actually exists. Thus, brain size is probably one of many factors, both biological and environmental, which account for racial intelligence differences.
Can ya rig the test?
Easy, who’s the most innovative?
Especially before colonialism spreading info. Right?
You can rig IQ tests and college transcripts, not more advanced farming equipment when the other group invented it centuries prior.
More than 15% of the population are literally useless.
This won’t end well.
Most of this hovering percentage (depending where you draw the line, with machine replacement) are male.
Society has no answer for this. There is no logical way to pander to them and save society from the thing sinking it aka them.
Einstein really hated white men, because the public introduction of nukes (muh publication and global display) has made it so we can’t cull our own useless eaters (the angry gamma types that hate authority, women and standards).
This is the death sentence of not cutting out cancer because it’s technically your own cells.
That’s what this has done. This is the start of dysgenics, nothing else.
I’m sure cancer cells would call for Muh Loyalty so the Titanic doesn’t patch its own hull and bail out water.
Breeding only comes a while after considerations of birth (i.e. the fact you must be born to be a parental candidate). Regression to the mean also pummels every population. This isn’t a one-time sweep.
Gammas: “muh right side of the bell curve!”
Here’s one study they cherry-pick:
“A grand total of two points. Don’t build your spaceships to escape the cooties just yet.”
And even there, look at the other half. Literally. Everything to the left of 1SD.
“When it comes to geniuses, these guys are trying to claim they’re Einstein by association.
That is retarded. Claim to be Hercules at least, he was male too. Aim high in your delusion.”
They hate authority because, being too stupid to be able to complete instructions, they assume the instructor hates them. They hate women because we’re sensitive to avoid any indicator of retarded offspring (ultimate waste of investment, more than being barren and caring for relatives). They hate standards because they know, deep down, in any society they’d be inferior and it would be out of reach. This makes them spiteful e.g. the anti-merit of barring women from colleges when they qualify. If you really think women are dumber, what do you care if you’d get in? Logically, they’d want weaker aka dumber people as their competition (why white SJWs want non-white SJWs in college). They think everyone cheats (college scandal) because they have to. Academia is now run by cheats (replication crisis) and its reputation under conservatives is no longer present.
This will lead to dystopia, which we’re already seeing moderately ripe fruits of.
They feel threatened by anyone because everyone is, statistically, an intellectual threat.
This explains chimp-outs at completely normal people and whatever the white version is, the mantrum?
The omegas are quiet and fine, the classic manual labourers. They mix the drinks, pick the food, clean the guns. Gammas have delusions of grandeur (supported by equalism) and when they fail, they’re the revenge fantasists. The low IQ/aggression link comes through there.
The SJWism started in the military when they forgot their purpose – cull the people society cannot feed.
This no below-X requirement is convenient for SJWs, who tend to be lower on the IQ scale themselves and oddly fearful of a draft that hasn’t happened since the last century.
The military have been pussies since world wars one and two, when, wouldn’t you know it, men started to go soft.
Yeah, because you practiced a dysgenic cull. In war, there’s always a cull. Introducing exemptions on age or fitness or IQ or mental malingering or having Daddy Moneybags will kill the country more surely than the cause.
Men went weak because of this. They over-compensate now with machines, all the gadgets in the world won’t help when your national IQ is declining. America needed Operation Paperclip or we’d all be speaking Russian now, because those non-white poor huddled masses from the previous 50 years had overbred.
Zero sum funding, the smart or the stupid. All the money to ‘rehabilitate’ criminals, to prison PS4s, to the translator in a primary school is money away from real art, real culture, real innovation, actual intelligence. It is costing you already.
Dumb men being arse-covered by greedy ones. There are far, far more male criminals, aren’t there?
In terms of a genetic product, that is a quality issue. The SJWs sense this but draw the wrong conclusions. We already have touchy-feely men, they’re in politics keeping the stupid mass of men going, for fun and profit.
You can’t sell junk food to kids living with both married parents eating home-cooked fare.
Football matches used to be a lot cheaper and had white, native players. Beer used to be cheaper and better. Clothes used to be non-plastic and retain a shape. You’ve lost everything your sex used to value. What happened to the trades? The technical colleges? The pubs?
The list goes on, classism feeds into it. Grow the poor with their feeblest like the reverse of making a thoroughbred, how they organise their own class breeding. You end up with fat Americans in a walmart blubbering along oohing and aahing in the playmobil mobile.
You were betrayed by your fellow man, women have got shit to do with that. We were often banned outright from those positions, it’s literally impossible. The main qualification was a dick, IQ didn’t matter to you, Mr Boys Club “have you met my shitbag of a son?“, so you kinda deserve this. If you wanna bring up YKW, well, Cromwell invited them back in. This blindspot shows how dumb the average white nationalist is.
Run the numbers.
None of you wanna bring in anti-nepotism law that requires the hire was of AVERAGE competence for the role.
or this shit happens
This saccharine naive libertarian “my fellow male would never betray me” – when competition and deceit is THE point of capitalism! THE point! The only one!
After WW2 in particular, the remaining men (most undeserving cowards, frauds etc) were left a plethora of women to breed with. These military restrictions are r-selected and treasonous to national interests.
No coincidence their children were druggy hippies. Quelle surprise. The shittiest cultural movement in human history. To match the biggest dysgenic cull 20-30 years prior.
I posted this before as “where did all the good men go?” dead, mostly.
A gamma at this point would pipe up: why not the women?
Well, women didn’t evolve to fight, for one. It’s fairer to force 50yo Harold than 20yo Cindy Lou.
Ultimately, it must be this way around though, since men can’t butt heads like rams anymore to sexually compete or duel, the civilized equivalent (that gangs, sports, the gym seek to emulate, weakly).
Bringing back duelling to the death between two consenting parties (like boxing minus gloves) would have the same eugenic effect on a smaller scale. It’s a check and balance also backed by the death penalty for various heinous crimes, that also, wouldn’t you know it, was taken off the books by weaklings.
Rules in sport prevent death – but that is the purpose of sport. Today, only narcissists enter sport, knowing they will not die. Further, they get to bully and ‘fight’ aka play fight, like a child. There are fewer restraints on children fighting, think about that. We also mix the schools to blur gender, so weak boys can hit girls. That sounds like a society that can recover its civilization. Men also had all sorts of evolved responses in a fight, many male animals try to tear or bite one another’s nuts off. I can’t imagine many ‘well hard’ MMA bitches wanting to enter a ring if THAT were an option.
But that’s a real fight. There are no rules, except try not to die.
The modern Olympics is a joke, people went to watch the athletes compete, really compete, which means possibly die.
Women have fake tits, men have fake balls. That’s why modern women don’t respect gym bros. Even gym girls cheat on them. That’s why. Boys with sometimes implanted muscles or chemically fake muscles who’d shriek like a bitch if you ‘broke the rules’.
What rules? Real fighting has no sodding rules, nancy boy. Go back even to the 1950s and they’d all be considered flaming effeminate cuntmuffins. They’re all ponces in their little shorts with their waxed chest and homoerotic bragging. Why don’t women want kids anymore? Well… look at the options.
I asked a military bloke if he wanted to go running: “nah, it’s too cold.”
There was a light drizzle and it was about 12C. That counts as warm here.
I tried to take the piss and the excuse was ‘he couldn’t get sick’. Sure. Fucking sure.
A lot of these sports people are fake outdoorsy, they’re scared of rain and cold.
No coincidence they move from colder places to LA or Australia. Bloody wimps.
‘but what about the women?’ – gammas who imagine women have it easy because they’re really that dumb
The low IQ women don’t breed anyway, either because no man wants to marry it (in civilized places where marriage happens before spawn) or because their stupidity kills their kids with the wrong food or neglect (r-parenting, including abortion).
Peterson tells you half the truth, that’s the rest.
What do we do with the dipshits?
Good question. Don’t mention most of them are men, that demo might get triggered.
Past a certain point of genetic deterioration and cultural degeneration, even the lowliest woman will calculate men are too weak to even risk breeding with. They wait until after the next cull – if not war, famine, disease etc. like a capitalist retaining their productivity under socialism. EXACTLY like that, it’s the other sex’s method of preservation of energy. Look at the surveys predicting (women hoping) everything gets worse. For a ‘baby boom’ you need a war first to sweep out the dregs of men, that’s a rule of history and this is why.
Eliminate outgroup race (30-40% in some areas), from that remainder then eliminate other religions or no religion (90%) and then not mental (50% or so remaining probably on meds that hide their psychotic tendencies) and who is left?
That’s without looking into high IQ (105+) because the past two generations either aborted to afford a few more holidays or they never found marriage material dating back to the post-WW2 shit tier bullshit.
You killed the golden goose. Globalization is a horseman in better threads.
This kinda shit annoys me because it isn’t Gen X/Y/Z’s actual fault.
Kids cost too much! We’re already funding immigrant ones! Plus lazy retirees! Plus foreign aid! We can barely afford rent! Still, I see birth rate memes.
How’s about pro-marriage memes for men?
The controlled ops wouldn’t like that, would probably fill it with mixed couples or IVFs. Therein lies the problem. How many of you arseholes have actually sat down and read the Race Relations Act? US or UK? That’s when the SJWs won. When you cannot legally walk away. That document cements forced multiculturalism aka white genocide.
Below a certain level, I don’t think an adult can actually BE a parent, yet we don’t require an IQ test for a breeding license because feefees. Human rights are granted automatically at 18, even if their mental age is always 14.
Aw, but morons who believe in man cards don’t want to be objectively independently tested, we’re meant to just trust their word they’re superior yet oppressed! Bring back SATs, FFS, before it’s too late!
Blame women for the dropping white male brain size compared to Asians, while you’re at it!
Is it our fault you lost fifty units of brain size over a few generations?
This is what happens when you fund the prosperity of the competition. You weaken the ingroup, it’s zero sum.
Upsetting idiots or a future, pick one.
Especially broflakes feefees online, where they’re all magically 130IQ but can’t construct a sentence where I don’t wish to scratch my eyes out. Shoot teachers who help students cheat, I’m serious. Do you want a dense surgeon or a thicko pilot? If education is serious, cheating it is cheating society aka treason. Meritocracy requires you punish cheats severely.
A child can just be punished by omission aka permanent record, nobody will hire, booted out of school.
No “oh my Bobby’s a rebel” bullshit from weak patriarchs.
THAT is real nationalism, a tight ship.
A purely “white is right” West has never existed because it would’ve been swarmed by its own idiots long before any success. There need to be strong discussions of what to do with the subhuman (neurologically, that’s what low IQ is, like a brain atavism from genetic load, their brain never completes adult development) in our own populations (certainly no incentives or celebrations!) and those we imported from the hillbilly nations of Europe e.g. Poland, with their child thieves and mother-whores bankrupting the NHS maternity wards at “fellow white’s” existential expense.
We have a dysgenic breeding pool, a eugenic economy, open borders, high crime and a huge debt state.
This won’t end pleasantly.
But fine – ignore me. Fine by me. No skin off my nose.
I’ve been saying this shit for literally years.