Mixed race regression to the mean

Since the parents are each below-average to miscegenate according to studies, the average between them isn’t much to write home about.
Hybrid vigour is a myth in humans because of regression to the mean. I didn’t explain this adequately in my hybrid vigour post because I assumed it was obvious statistics, 101.
This applies to any metric and within the same race too, it’s just that the differences inter-racially are more depressing, genetically and literally. IQ, height, blood type, psychiatric risk, cancer risk, menarche, gestation time, forensic facial architecture, lifespan all vary between races. This isn’t good for mixed children than it would have been for the child of the healthier parent with another person of similar health (intraracial). I cover a health study with psychiatric implications lower down.

Galton came up with ‘regression to the mean’ and you can see it here.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/12/a-mediocre-mans-great-son-a-great-mans-mediocre-son/
“What is more curious is how this related to the reality of regression toward the mean. This is a very general statistical concept, but for our purposes we’re curious about its application in quantitative genetics. People often misunderstand the idea from what I can tell, and treat it as if there is an orthogenetic-like tendency of generations to regress back toward some idealized value.”

Remember, geniuses tend to have ordinary children and genius can spring from ordinary parents.
It’s easy to see regression in supermodels. Plain parents, the children of supermodels rarely match their parents, let alone exceed them.
Most mutations are bad. Each child is a petri dish of half their parents.

“So how does it work? A few years ago a friend told me that the best way to think about it was a bivariate distribution, where the two random variables are additive genetic variation and environmental genetic variation. Clearer? For many, probably not. To make it concrete, let’s go back to the old standby: the quantitative genetics of height…..”

Mostly genetic, the ‘nurture’ are epigenetic effects we don’t yet understand e.g. nutrition, less back-breaking work.

This is where many people get confused (frankly, those whose intelligence is somewhat closer to the mean!). They presume that a subsequent generation of mating would result in further regression back to the mean. No! Rather, the expected value of the offspring would be 0.16 units. Why?
Because through the process of selection you’ve created a new genetic population. The selection process is imperfect in ascertaining the exact causal underpinning of the trait value of a given individual. In other words, because height is imperfectly heritable some of the tall individuals you select are going to be tall for environmental reasons, and will not pass that trait to heir offspring. But height is ~80% heritable, which means that the filtering process of genes by using phenotype is going to be rather good, and the genetic makeup of the subsequent population will be somewhat deviated from the original parental population. In other words, the reference population to which individuals “regress” has now changed. The environmental variation remains, but the additive genetic component around which the regression is anchored is now no longer the same.
This is why I state that regression toward the mean is not magical in a biological sense. There is no population with fixed traits to which selected individuals naturally regress or revert to. Rather, populations are useful abstractions in making sense of the statistical correlations we see around us. The process of selection is informed by population-wide trends, so we need to bracket a set of individuals as a population. But what we really care about are the genetic variables which underpin the variation across the population. And those variables can change rather easily through selection. Obviously regression toward the mean would be exhibit the magical reversion-toward-ideal-type property that some imagine if the variables were static and unchanging. But if this was the matter of things, then evolution by natural selection would never occur!”

But IQ is depressed by mutation load, when they talk of ‘cognitive performance’. That’s why geniuses don’t tend to have genius children, and no, well-educated is not a proxy. Chimps can pass tests.

Steve describes regression to the mean in IQ well here.
isteve.blogspot.com/2013/01/regression-toward-mean-and-iq.html

Here’s a 2-minute clip of a professor explaining it.

http://www.unz.com/jman/regression-to-the-mean/

https://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/18/iq-regression-to-the-mean-the-genetic-prediction-vindicated/
“What kind of luck explains the fact that the children of high-IQ parents have lower IQs while they are reared in cognitive stimulating environments, when the children of low-IQ parents who were raised in chaotic environments still have higher IQs than their parents ? The IQs regress halfway (50%) to the population mean at both sides of the IQ distribution. If we stick to the Dickens-Flynn model (2001) of feedback loops, one would expect that children of high-IQ parents have higher IQ and children of low-IQ parents an IQ even lower. But the opposite happens. This criticism, in the end, does not provide any explanation for the fact that the regression is homogeneous across the different levels of IQ. As Jensen made it clear, the IQ subgroups do not depart from linearity for an IQ range going from 50 to 150.
While some say that regression to the mean occurs because of some kind of (random) measurement errors, it should be noted that IQ regression to the mean analyses are usually performed by using the method of estimated true scores, that is, IQ scores corrected for measurement error, or unreliability, with the formula :…”

Rushton brings in r/K theory here
http://philipperushton.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/iq-race-bell-curve-r-k-theory-rushton-intelligence-political-inequality-public-policy-1997.pdf
since this mating strategy also differs between race in probability, as much as individuals.
See the number of ‘single mothers’ for irrefutable proof. Domestic violence, rape by race etc.

From The Scientific Study of General Intelligence
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rPNFXBnwuNoC&pg=PA176&lpg=PA176&dq=regression+to+the+mean+mixed+race&source=bl&ots=7MSkcTp6I1&sig=9ARvUoujsiIORB0BN-ljodWC3Ls&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjwzaDe-73UAhXpJcAKHdzaCTYQ6AEIajAM#v=onepage&q=regression%20to%20the%20mean%20mixed%20race&f=false
“4.7 Blacks and Whites regress toward their predicted racial means”
Scientifically, you’d expect this.
Statistically. As it goes on to say “no culture-only theory predicts these results.”
4.8 details rate of maturation between White, Asian and Black babies. This clearly includes the brain and does impact IQ means.
Black men also average more testosterone, which does explain the rape rates of Africa somewhat and doesn’t form a defense. Black women have it higher too, never seen a feminine jawline on one.
Whites form the medium group, we’re Goldilocks on a lot of this.
“for each characteristic, the mixed race mean fell between…”
As in, not superior than either parent. EITHER parent.
A meta-analysis in Nature back in 2015 with an overly-broad pool prone to Replicability Crisis is not a new study. Height is not a fine metric, it’s too masculine, lung capacity is too specific and ‘cognitive ability’ avoids IQ, the gold and only standard of ‘g’. It doesn’t control adequately for education (see Tiger Moms for how much crazy dominance that can be).

It’s grotesquely unfair to hold these children, already doomed in the dating world, to standards neither of their parents could meet! Is that level of control not child abuse?
https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/mixed-race-kids.pdf
I do sympathize with them, it is a plight because they never chose their situation, their terrible, awful parents did.
“As one might expect, on a host of background and achievement characteristics, mixed race kids fall in between whites and blacks…” and they are more antisocial than expected too. They don’t study psychiatric conditions to explain this, as they do with whites.

PubMed published “Health and behavior risks of adolescents with mixed-race identity” which nudges closer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
Guess the result.
“Most studies are based on clinical reports or reports of mixed-race samples without comparison to single-race groups. It is not surprising that such samples lead to the conclusion of emotional and behavior problems, as clinical samples are self-selected for problems. No national data on adolescents have been reported, except from the sample we used.”
Table 2 is useful: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/table/t2/
“…Mixed-race Whites and Asians show significantly greater risk for considering suicide, having sex, repeating a grade, and being suspended. Support for the hypothesis of greater risk status of mixed race compared with single race is most strongly supported for general health, supported for substance use…”
Ouch, guess Yellow Fever has a toll too.
Pay up.
Table 3 is specfic to combinations of race: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/table/t3/

“These analyses answer the question of whether mixed-race-identified adolescents are at higher risk than single-race-identified adolescents. .. Therefore, the overall inference from the controlled analysis is that the differences between single-race and mixed-race identifiers on the control variables we introduced are not the source of the higher risk encountered by mixed-race adolescents.”
“Previous analyses in this article have been limited to health and behavior risk variables. We examined a set of variables measuring individual and family characteristics that are not in and of themselves health and behavior risk variables, i.e., they are not attitudes, voluntary behaviors, or health symptoms. We offer 4 comparisons (family education, family structure, GPA, and PVT), each of them correlated with socioeconomic status. GPA is a measure of success in school. The PVT is highly correlated with success in school and is correlated with general intelligence tests. Because single-race respondents differ by race on these variables,”

trans. Different races are different.

“it is possible that single-race respondents also differ from mixed-race respondents on the same variables. These measures are all considered here as not caused by personal motivations, decisions, or actions with respect to family structure, family education, and PVT, and at least partially for GPA. They represent cultural opportunities and cultural handicaps. Mixed-race adolescents may be supposed to have had exposure to the cultural fates of 2 racial groups. They may therefore be hypothesized to be between the 2 racial groups with which they identify on such attributes.”

Ding ding ding regression to the mean!

“The general pattern of these nonrisk attributes is that the mixed-race groups have values that are between the values of the 2 constituent races. This lends support to the hypothesis that the mixed-race adolescents have been influenced by both racial groups and, therefore, have an experience that is between those who report the single constituent races.”

The discussion opens:

The preponderance of our evidence supports the conclusion that adolescents who identify more than 1 race are at higher health and behavior risks when compared with those who identify with 1 race only. This applies in a general way and is not distinctive to any particular race combinations. Further, it is not peculiar to any particular type of risk, but to most risks, both health and behavior.
Because risk among mixed-race adolescents is higher for all race combinations, some across-the-board explanation must be inferred….”

Did you guess nurture? They blame nurture.

so we may therefore choose to interpret mixed race as a source of stress. We cannot identify further the source of the stress. Subsequent research can start with the assumption of greater risk for the mixed-race-identified adolescent and try to identify the sources of stress. Only then can we recommend programmatic attention to mixed-race youths.”

Who wants to subject their offspring to that by choice?

What kind of atrocious parents would choose this?

…Isn’t stress biological?

Brazil can openly study it, thanks to demographic necessity.
Historical paper.
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0102-01882016000200107&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
“In Latin America it was possible to study the negative effects of racial mixing…” – LC Brito, 2016.

Funny story.
Reports about the daughters of white abolitionists marrying blacks in the north were very common in the Southern press. An example was the marriage of Sarah Judson, whose story was published in the newspaper Memphis Daily Appeal in 1859 and according to the author, “would turn the stomach of any white.” The bride, daughter of a “radical abolitionist,” was induced by her father to marry a black man “against the designs of nature.”4″

and the origin of the word ‘miscegenation’:

The Democrats thus used a strategy to link once and for all the image of President Lincoln to the practice of amalgamation. In the heat of the electoral campaign, two democratic journalists, David Goodman Croly and George Wakeman, used a pamphlet called “Miscegenation: the theory of racial mixing applied to the white American man and the black.” The leaflet was false, and the intention of the authors, then anonymous, was to leave the impression of that it had been written by radical Republican abolitionists, supporters of Lincoln and inter-racial marriage. The text had a great repercussion in the North, where the majority of the president’s voters were based, affecting public opinion terrorized by the ideas defended in the pamphlet, which promoted racial mixing as something practiced among the most advanced nations of the world.

The text also pointed to people of mixed race as being the people of the future, a vision not very common in the United States, affirming that mixed races were superior and thereby opposed to the central justification of white superiority: racial purity (Lemire, 2002, p. 116; Fredrickson, 1971, pp. 171-174).

The pamphlet created the term miscegenation, which from then on would be used to designate mixing between people from different races. “

The propaganda has been in effect for a long time.

“The use of Latin America can be perceived in the section “Superiority of the mixed races.” Here the authors stated that the mixed races were mentally, physically, and morally superior to the pure race which had not mixed, and mentioned the example of the sambos in South America, descendants of blacks and Indians. Once again, Brazil was cited as an example of a country where the people were miscegenated, collaborating with the consolidation of the idea of mixing in the country.”

This 1860 clip from a newspaper is timely.

“Unfortunately, the Brazilian constitution considers all men equal if they are free, whether they are black men or white men. The effects of the equality of these laws do not need demonstration. This has plunged Brazil into a political revolution which has been destroying the Imperial government and its army, the majority of which is composed of blacks who will shortly dictate the terms of emancipation to the nation and the Empire will be converted into another Venezuela.”

Venezuela is currently eating their pets.

Anyway…

“Opposing the thesis of the degeneration of mulattos, the author stated that individuals of a biracial origin also could serve as an intermediate class which could reduce possible racial tensions, as had occurred in Haiti.12″

Serve?

Footnote

“According to the Webster Dictionary (1828), the term mongrel is defined as “of mixed breed, of different kinds, animal of mixed breed.” The word is associated with mingle which according to the same dictionary means ‘mixing’ and also ‘promiscuity.'”

Without specialization, a bereft quality.

You can search that site by subject but this is the only paper I found on ‘racial mixing’. I did try. Moving on…

I need to collate more data on the products of miscegenetion but the data is rarely collected, honestly interpreted and
published openly. The results don’t fit the Narrative.
There are places you can look but they’re too broad in my judgement, and miss fine-grain studies like the Asian myopia risk, based in precise genetic strains.

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_race_mixing

http://www.deathofcommunism.josru.com/effects-of-race-mixing

On psychiatric risk,
http://www.sec-ed.co.uk/news/mixed-race-children-at-greater-risk-of-mental-health-issues
whitegenocideproject.com/study-mixed-race-people-have-identity-problems/
https://www.unc.edu/news/archives/oct03/udry10302003.html

They can’t ask for taxpayer money without admitting there’s a problem.

They tend to exclude the biracial from studies because it leads to inconvenient questions.
Example
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1336
They must care so much.

Social outcomes suffer as well.

Asians more prone to vision issues than Whites

Ah, genetics.

Don’t count on them taking over just yet, when they can’t shoot a gun.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11008#t1

“At the gene level, some genes such as SHISA6-DNAH9 have been shown to interact with education level and exhibit strong genetic effects for myopia among Asians with at least higher secondary education10. In the current study, we demonstrate that new genetic effects implicated in myopia development could be uncovered by studying interactions between genetic variants and education level.”

Psst! Heterogeneity means racial differences!

“High education level was associated with a twofold more myopic spherical equivalent in individuals of Asian as compared with European ancestry (Asians: β=−1.09 D, 95% CI: −1.20 to −0.98 D; Europeans: β=−0.49 D, 95% CI: −0.54 to −0.44 D; Fig. 1). Among Asian studies, we also observed heterogeneity of education effects for refractive error. The education effects on spherical equivalent in Singapore Chinese were significantly larger than that in other Asian studies (Singapore Chinese: β=−1.75 D, 95% CI: −1.92 to −1.58 D; other Asian cohorts: β=−0.60 D, 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.46 D).”

Asians are even distinct from one another.
Can the weeaboo supremacy crap.

“The JMA for spherical equivalent in 10,315 individuals from the Asians cohorts identified genome-wide significant association for three genes: AREG, GABRR1 and PDE10A (PJMA<5.0 × 10−8; Table 3 and Fig. 2b). SNP × education interaction effects associated with spherical equivalent were observed at all three loci, with genetic effects significantly larger within participants who had a higher level of education compared with those with a lower education level: AREG (rs12511037, βint=−0.89±0.14 D, Pint=6.87 × 10−11), GABRR1 (rs13215566, βint=−0.56±0.14 D, Pint=8.48 × 10−5) and PDE10A (rs12206610, βint=−0.72±0.13 D, Pint=2.32 × 10−8). The genotype and phenotype associations were highly significant in the higher education stratum

mfw intelligence is genetic

(main genetic effects, 1.97 × 10−10≤Pmain≤8.16 × 10−8) but were considerably weaker in the lower education stratum (0.008≤Pmain≤0.243). There was no evidence of inter-study heterogeneity at index SNPs within AREG, GABRR1 or PDE10A loci (Q-test: Phet≥0.122).
GABRR1 and PDE10A index SNPs were not associated with spherical equivalent in European samples, for either the JMA test, SNP main effect or SNP × education interaction (Table 3). AREG SNP rs12511037 was excluded in the meta-analysis of European studies after QC filtering; hence, a proxy SNP, rs1246413, in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs12511037 in Asians (r2=0.97) was tested but not associated with spherical equivalent (PJMA=0.527; Pint=0.176).

my genetics are my privilege

The meta-regression including study-level characteristics as covariates in the model confirmed the heterogeneity between populations of European and Asian ancestry (GABRR1: P=0.006; PDE10A: P=0.0419; Supplementary Table 4). For PDE10A, besides ethnicity, average spherical equivalent of each study also explained the inter-study heterogeneity for the interaction effects (P=0.025).”

Money shot!

It’s almost as if their culture wasn’t based around reading so much as rice farming?
As opposed to Europe, where most people could write their own name.

The Left mindset detests beauty

I want to comment on a comment left on VD’s blog.

I won’t link because it’s irrelevant.

“They hate you not because you are Christian but because you are white, they only hate Christianity because it is a proxy for traditional European culture.”

Every war is a race war. It’s all Darwin, all genetic, a selection pressure.
The Left’s only lasting principle is anti-white. This is unusual for its longevity when their signals change constantly to confuse us  and keep us reactive so we can’t intellectually mobilize.

The mindset of the left is the mindset of the serial killer whenever they see a pretty white women they want to torture and kill her.

Ed Gein was a tranny, btw.
“When I see a pretty girl…”
And despite the Oedipal issues in misogyny, nobody advocates returning to Freud.
Men need standards of honour and decency not blame and bitchiness.

They want to get rid of white men so all white women can be raped.

The fake right who think a brown man’s opinion is greater than any white woman….on the white homelands? Tempted to point out that’s cultural theft, outright.
When the West is undefended, it dies. If Western man is weak, woman falls prey. Sex is the reward of conquest, breeding.
Sexual divide and conquer is a cloak and dagger to ignore the racial element of ‘tension’ issues.
Multiculturalism is the enemy, men and women were fine while homogenous in their own homelands.
Remember that, they don’t want you to. Immigration is the Trojan horse. You can’t be raped by someone in another continent and Muslims use homosexual rape as a punishment too. I’ve mentioned this recently.

They want all pretty people castrated so that only the ugly can breed because they hate beauty and love ugliness. Cucking pretty people into adopting brown babies and supporting the third world is just their consolation prize. They would like all pretty people to have their faces mutilated for the sake of equality.”

Ah, Harrison Bergeron, so predictive of the politics of Cultural Marxist envy.
This was a comment floating the idea of white men converting to Islam en masse. 2 issues.
1. women wouldn’t follow. We’re not stupid. Jesus never needed to hit a woman when you hurt his feelings. That’s strength, in all mating preference studies for marriage, women prefer conscientiousness in men. Sadism is the polar pathological opposite. At best, they’d attract the crazy ones.
2. you can preach and quote without conversion, especially quoting the common opinions on Jews. This might be why older working-class factions like Corbyn are temporarily aligned with the Muslims.
It’s a countersignal to temporarily defang them, especially from splintering off into their own party and forming an Islamic Party of Great Britain, which would eat into Labour’s own voteshare. However, it pushes us further away from a return to national traditionalism, where true security and progress lies. Meanwhile, NRx has long discussions of what traditionalism is, but fine if you want to ignore it. What comes after your civil war? Vacuums need plans.
Islam isn’t a religion, it’s a war manual, to submit to supranational slavery. They’re worse than the Catholics ever were. The majority of Muslims would starve if the taxpayer stopped funding them, they’re leeches in the most literal fiscal sense. Without production, how do they take over? Well, enslavement. The Left are lazy and already parasitic as r-types, do you really think they’ll work harder for the Arab than the European? No, they won’t work at all. We destroy the Left by letting their chickens come home to roost, by encouraging squabbles and in-fighting. They have no loyalty to the host nation or one another, this will come to a head and the sooner the better. Concern trolling as one group to another. This works. Black ops is invisible to idiots.
All you need to do is cite the Talmud AND the Koran, there are plenty of online resources for passages, cite it with original, not dhimmi or gentile wording, and the Left cannot object to this without their favourite pet turning on them because the Left is entirely dis-united. This signal boosts the true face of these religions too. Anything that stops them pulling together strengthens us. Otherwise, demographics is a ticking time bomb. It needs to be kept as casual references, defanging the cultural and acadmic power of Cultural Marxists who think Islam is so secular and neoliberally progressive. Simply throw it in their face casually often enough and they’ll stop signalling it. I know how these people work so please listen to me. Tweeting passages to celebrities and using them casually in articles is the ultimate weapon. It doesn’t take them seriously because only the Left are stupid enough. It’s a glorious shitpost.

I’ve mentioned the technical apsects of signalling here many a time, if you take it seriously, the signalling value is NIL.

This also gives away the premise and paradigm to the enemy, to judge you on their metrics. You want to flip the sociological (social) script by questioning their premises but in such a way they feel ashamed to openly discuss those premises. You cannot be serious, that’s WHY the Left cannot meme! No sense of humour! Too serious!

They almost want you to use their memes, to embolden them as the only ones worth stealing. I know how they’d play this because I know how these people operate. I already know how they’ll break their own toys if you steal them – white privilege. It’s been set up this whole time, beginning with the original sin of white guilt. Instead you must oppose the r-selected behaviours. That is their Achille’s because according to them, all behaviour is a Tabula Rasa CHOICE.

R-types enable r-types. Do not enable them in rape, theft or murder. They want that. Never do what the enemy wants, reaction formation is sane when you’re acting in self-interest.

They detest any meme that calls them to demonstrate virtue, see “so much for the tolerant Left” which exposed their hatred and bloodlust for civilized culture. The Left always come out with their authoritarian face eventually and we need to speed this up. Let people see them for what they truly are. If we keep trying to out them, they bury deeper like societal termites. Let them in-fight and expose themselves. They oppose liberty, the intellectual freedom to dissent foremost. Workers must keep working – or else. Show them which hand holds the whip.

That is how status signalling works. You don’t walk up to someone and say “I’m rich”, you mention your holiday in the Alps. Don’t sperg all over the place and think you’ll change them and their Narrative. You’ll just vindicate Muslim positions when you should be vindicating Christian ones using Islam and Judaism so they dunno which one to start on without either sponsor turning like a rabid dog. Game theory, guys. We’re using their common tactic of triangulation against them, because they are naturally diverse, divided and we are not.

You can’t countersignal a countersignal (eugenic by dysgenic), you can’t satire a satire (the Alt Right’s success, see: Why mockery?) but you can signal something similar but different, to weaken the original one and strengthen your future ones. Think of it as ideological lubricant. We need to slide into a real war on terror with Crusades nice n’ easy.

The first move in chess has the most freedom but the second holds the strategic advantage since the opponent’s move is already set. To choose another game, we need only knock down their dominoes. They’ve arranged them opposing one another, it’s a flawless set-up IF ONLY you get them to swipe at one another, also giving us time to replace them culturally. This is why I am also NRx and see no contradiction with calling for a cultured aristocracy. It replaces the extant academic degenerate class of Cultural Marxism, which the Alt Right’s existence is dependent on. When CM is gone, the AR too shall disband, like soldiers after the war. To do what? Depends on your traditionalist vision of utopia.

The stage five clingers will just be shirkers power-tripping.

Do you want to save the West or call someone an n-word online?

Guardian partially admits Out-of-Africa outdated

OOA for short. It’s fun watching them scrabble to keep the narrative ‘we’re all African’.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/07/oldest-homo-sapiens-bones-ever-found-shake-foundations-of-the-human-story
“Fossils recovered from an old mine on a desolate mountain in Morocco have rocked one of the most enduring foundations of the human story: that Homo sapiens arose in a cradle of humankind in East Africa 200,000 years ago.  Archaeologists unearthed the bones of at least five people at Jebel Irhoud, a former barite mine 100km west of Marrakesh, in excavations that lasted years. They knew the remains were old, but were stunned when dating tests revealed that a tooth and stone tools found with the bones were about 300,000 years old.
“My reaction was a big ‘wow’,” said Jean-Jacques Hublin, a senior scientist on the team at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig. “I was expecting them to be old, but not that old.” 
Hublin said the extreme age of the bones makes them the oldest known specimens of modern humans and poses a major challenge to the idea that the earliest members of our species evolved in a “Garden of Eden” in East Africa one hundred thousand years later.”

Yeah yeah, sequence the genome.
No excuse.

““This gives us a completely different picture of the evolution of our species. It goes much further back in time, but also the very process of evolution is different to what we thought,” Hublin told the Guardian. “It looks like our species was already present probably all over Africa by 300,000 years ago. If there was a Garden of Eden, it might have been the size of the continent.” [DS: were*]
Jebel Irhoud has thrown up puzzles for scientists since fossilised bones were first found at the site in the 1960s. Remains found in 1961 and 1962, and stone tools recovered with them, were attributed to Neanderthals and at first considered to be only 40,000 years old. At the time, a popular view held that modern humans evolved from Neanderthals. [genetics confirms this in all non-Africans] Today, the Neanderthals are considered a sister group [wtf is that in science] that lived alongside, and even bred with, our modern human ancestors.”

Our?

I love it when The Guardian repeats the science I’ve been saying for years. They’re still clutching at straws.

“Other fossils and genetic evidence all point to an African origin for modern humans.”
Or outright lying.
“The most striking difference was the shape of the braincase which was more elongated than that of humans today. It suggests, said Hublin, that the modern brain evolved in Homo sapiens and was not inherited from a predecessor.”
No it does not. That’s distinctive to Cro Magnon man. Stop lying. Test for the characteristic R1 haplogroup of Cro Magnon man.
“The tools they brought with them have been resharpened, resharpened, and resharpened again. They did not produce new tools on the spot.”
Obviously they stole them. So, probably not Cro Magnon.
They died in a mountain. A mine of materials. Therefore, they couldn’t make those tools.
“But he finds the theory compelling. “The idea is that early Homo sapiens dispersed around the continent and elements of human modernity appeared in different places,”
That’s called the multi-regional hypothesis (MRH) and all the forensic evidence of Neanderthals proves it definitively. That is also why they say every race was actually Homo Sapiens except for them btw, they don’t want to count it.
“and so different parts of Africa contributed to the emergence of what we call modern humans today,” he said.”
No, that’s literally the opposite. Africa wasn’t the centre. There was no centre. There was NO Eden, there was no singular unified group, that is a Victorian myth.
And also, how can ‘Africa’ be the centre, but also different parts of it >1? OOA is limited to one source!
““One of the big questions about the emergence of anatomically modern humans has been did our body plan evolve quickly or slowly. This find seems to suggest the latter.”
Sampling bias?
“It seems our faces became modern long before our skulls took on the shape they have today.””
That is physically impossible if you ask a neuroscientist. The skull forms around the brain. Hell, ask a forensic anthropologist, if you can hear the reply through the laughter.
“Does the new find imply there was more than one hominin lineage in Africa at this time? It really stirs the pot.”
-more than one
-but in Africa
….Pangea isn’t Africa.
“Lee Berger, whose team recently discovered the 300,000 year-old Homo naledi, an archaic-looking human relative, near the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage site outside Johannesburg, said dating the Jebel Irhoud bones was thrilling, but is unconvinced that modern humans lived all over Africa so long ago. “They’ve taken two data points and not drawn a line between them, but a giant map of Africa,” he said.”
Cookie for you, Lee. Salty delivery, I like it.
“adding that stone tools can move around in cave sediments and settle in layers of a different age.” John is right but fails to mention that has limits based on the soil composition.
“For me, claiming these remains are Homo sapiens stretches the meaning of that term a bit,” Shea added. “These humans who lived between 50,000-300,000 years ago are a morphologically diverse bunch. Whenever we find more than a couple of them from the same deposits, such as at Omo Kibish and Herto in Ethiopia or Skhul and Qafzeh in Israel, their morphology is all over the place both within and between samples.”
Better, so close to the r-word, or at least sub-species?
“It really does look like in Africa especially, but also globally, our evolution was characterised by numerous different species all living at the same time and possibly even in the same places.

The cognitive dissonance is strong.

Couldn’t even make it a single logical sentence.

While, if you look at a link at the bottom of that very article:
They admit the African skull they claimed as sub-human is actually just African human, modern African.
People think I’m shitting them with how much race reality the Guardian admits but they don’t know it’s leaking out. Never attribute to malice….

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/oct/17/skull-homo-erectus-human-evolution
“The Dmanisi fossils show that H erectus migrated as far as Asia soon after arising in Africa.”
trans. We found them in Asia and need to cover this up.
“The latest skull discovered in Dmanisi belonged to an adult male and was the largest of the haul. It had a long face and big, chunky teeth. But at just under 550 cubic centimetres, it also had the smallest braincase of all the individuals found at the site.”
“They found that while the Dmanisi skulls looked different to one another, the variations were no greater than those seen among modern people and among chimps.”
If those African skulls weren’t human, they were sub-human, some maintain this.
“Everything that lived at the time of the Dmanisi was probably just Homo erectus,” said Prof Zollikofer.”
Here’s the photo:

“If you found the Dmanisi skulls at isolated sites in Africa, some people would give them different species names. But one population can have all this variation. We are using five or six names, but they could all be from one lineage.”
So close to admitting it.
So damn close.
“Some palaeontologists see minor differences in fossils and give them labels, and that has resulted in the family tree
accumulating a lot of branches,” said White. “The Dmanisi fossils give us a new yardstick, [no?] and when you apply that yardstick to the African fossils, a lot of that extra wood in the tree is dead wood. [your opinion is not proof] It’s arm-waving.”
Translated from academese: let’s lower the standard for Africa because it makes them look like chimps and not fully human.
Some are honestly skeptical of this proposition
“I think they will be proved right that some of those early African fossils can reasonably join a variable Homo erectus species,” said Chris Stringer, head of human origins at the Natural History Museum in London. “But Africa is a huge continent with a deep record of the earliest stages of human evolution, [note: not the only record] and there certainly seems to have been species-level diversity there prior to two million years ago. So I still doubt that all of the ‘early Homo’ fossils can reasonably be lumped into an evolving Homo erectus lineage. We need similarly complete African fossils from two to 2.5m years ago to test that idea properly.”

trans. They’re modern, just fucking admit it.

“This is a fantastic and important discovery, but I don’t think the evidence they have lives up to this broad claim they are making. They say this falsifies that Australopithecus sediba is the ancestor of Homo. The very simple response is, no it doesn’t.”

10/10

“Asians age really well”

Alternate title: Asian women age the best.

Spoken by someone who has never seen elderly Asian women.

Not to be mean, but they age worse. So much worse.
Go to a beach or look up photos of elderly Asian women on the beach if you dare.

Bikini shots if ya got em.

then there’s this ridiculous propaganda that a 49-year old can look like a 19-year old

ever

pull the other one


this applies somewhat, deceptive considering the amount of makeup and surgery, but yes menopause is the ticker

also, nada about Indians, Chinese, Pakistanis, Afghanis etc etc.

AKA most of the Asians

Recently seen a trend for Greeks and Indians. Imagine how hairy the kids omg…

Ah, this one’s familiar. The public sour expression as they tolerate the beta males because they want half-white babies. They rarely see it but everyone else does, usually as a flicker when he speaks.

When they discuss how white women age, they always go for the anorexic ones.

Not to mention bad shots of makeup, close-up, when non-whites are at a distance with better make-up.

e.g.

https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=3708515
User ‘Black is beautiful’ asks: Why do white women age in dog years?
No bias, I’m sure.
No jealousy, certainly.
Try starting a thread asking why non-white women are so morbidly obese, even when vegetarian. That should be fun.

Empire and economics (inflation, deflation, hyper)

Speculative but educated post. I wrote this a few days ago but took those off out of respect.
It goes from professional to shitpost-territory. A lot of known-knowns you’re supposed to pretend not to know.

8,000 words, most of them shit-tier.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/inflation-or-deflation-debate-continues.html

“A key issue in this debate is that not all debt is created equal, while a parent often absolves a loan to their child the bank seldom forgives a loan on an automobile. Sometimes like in the reality game show Survivor it comes down to who is left standing. I contend winning does not always come down to who is the best, strongest, or smartest, but that luck and many other factors also come into play in how things unfold. For example, imagine two widget factories on the hill outside of town and both with the same pricing and quality product but financially weak, if a storm knocks out production at one factory resulting in its closing the other would benefit from inheriting its customers and maybe even able to raise prices. This comes down to the idea of old fashion supply and demand. This revolves around the supply of money just as much as it does to the supply of the commodity it is being used to purchase. We are often forced to question the formulas used to compute inflation.”

On hyperinflation risk;

“I continue to contend the primary reason that inflation has not raised its ugly head or become a major economic issue is because we are pouring such a large percentage of wealth into intangible products or goods. This includes currencies. If faith drops in these intangible “promises” which is the base of our financial system and money would suddenly flow into tangible goods seeking a safe haven inflation would soar. This theory will be explored more in part 2 of this three-part series.”

Hm.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/coming-economic-end-game-may-be-more.html

“Following this and I do mean following as by “several” months, central banks will be forced to unleash such a massive amount of new currency into the system to combat the scourge of deflation that it will stagger the mind. This will in effect clear the deck of deadwood through hyperinflation and pave the way forward to introduce a new or a “batch of new” currencies.”

I don’t think we’ll trust the old money-lenders with a new currency. There’d be no faith without a change in leadership and I mean total.

The debts that are not written off will become a moot point in that most will be devalued and paid off in worthless paper. The important issue will not be fairness but how to get from here to there with the least damage to the institutions and wealth those in power seek to protect. Sooner or later all great Ponzi schemes must come to an end.”

Student loans are bullshit, exhibit A. You can’t tax labour that hasn’t happened.

You can expect promises to be rewritten and broken. Rules will change as we go through the wash. Most people will see their assets rinsed away as society is put through the wringer. For example, expect the cost of living adjustment on social security to be modified reducing payments to the elderly. Adding to the woes of retirees is that many pensions will be forced to reduce payouts and break promises as the returns on their investment fail to meet expectations. Many of the guarantees and paper promises granted over the past decades will prove to be less valuable than the paper they are printed on.”

Pensions were immoral anyway, fuck the people who never bothered to save.
You can’t promise someone else’s money, especially in the future, that may never manifest (Rise of the NEETs).
The pensioners wish to tax the blood and tears of the young, if work’s so good for everyone, they can join in.
Real estate will drop like a stone in the ocean, it was puffed up by foreign investment from dodgy governments but without anyone willing to purchase at (their) prices, the move to cashless will try and curtail any black market bartering. We’re already living under Junk Food Prohibition to anesthetize us.
There is no such thing as a blue chip. All stocks are equally worthless without workers. Marx didn’t account for the stock market but it requires cooperative workers and a stable currency. Cue laugh track.
I dislike this gloomy tone but there’s no way around it. The loss of personal savings by citizens is the tragedy, shitty
investments in the property bubble deserve to die, you have an obligation to maintain property the same way as a classic car.
At least cars are valuable by brand and model, the location of your home is dependent on local demographics so it’s no wonder immigration is an *issue* to those with large holdings wanting to preserve their ill-gotten gains and continue to squeeze the youth like we won’t snap at some point. The low-IQ imports may be violent but otherwise not a threat, it’s the people who placed us in this situation for greed that must be dealt with in the French way.
Generation Rent doesn’t just apply to houses – we stream, we eat out and we’re raised on convenience. When all that supply chain goes away, a lot of former Communist Guardian readers will become capitalist without their coffee fix. If you count latte as coffee.
Of particular note will be the starvation of the public sector, as it deserves via unfunded liabilities (i.e. grand theft stato). The Unions will attempt to demand value that doesn’t exist at the same time the gibs are spoiling and rioting for their soma of shitty tech and shittier food.

“Many of the guarantees and paper promises granted over the past decades will prove to be less valuable than the paper they are printed on.”

As a child, I was told never to trust an IOU because you never know what will happen to the person writing it and neither do they.

“As pawns in this game, we can either choose to sacrifice ourselves or fight. In this case fighting means to undertake a strategy that protects what we can of the life we have created within the power we have been granted. The fact you are reading and thinking about this subject puts you in a far better position than the masses who see before them blue skies and unicorns grazing upon a hill.”

The fatted calf who thinks it’s going on a pleasant walk.

“Make no mistake, we cannot and should not look for a white knight to come riding in to save the day, no such leader exists to lead us out of the economy hell we have created.”

Yes, no such person exists, except the rebuilding effort after the expulsions. Deporting the traitors is more important than the invaders and this way they ruin whichever country they land in. You shouldn’t want to save this system unless you’re one of them.
The normalcy bias and expectations of Economic Jesus ready to forgive all our fiscal sins is keeping it ticking over.

“hard assets need to be in your possession and hidden away.”

TP and painkillers, got it.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/empires-often-collapse-from-cancer.html

The problem appears to be usury. It’s really economic slavery. Babies can’t sign contracts and give consent, however much you want to financially circumcise them of a liberty-filled future.

“We need a good war” – yes, but not the kind that costs money.
The democratic comes first, then the civil.
A money war is what all elites want and spoil for the head of the supply queue like fat pigs.
Their children have two passports and a private jet, they won’t enter military service.
Anyone with a second passport cannot be considered loyal to their country.
I think a lot of the young are going into credit card debt for necessities or because they believe it’ll be written off once
the companies go under. Self-sabotage, sabotages the system.
The middle-class and middle-aged will pay with their assets, as they deserve.
In this system, it pays to have a lot or almost nothing.
Lower Boomers and Upper Gen X are fucked.

from counter signal memes

It isn’t the 1% or the .1%.
It’s the 20% or so (uppermost tax bracket, The Rich) supporting them.
Chop down the supports, usually in investment banking and they fall too.
“the massive government that promised so much.”

If you believe in a free lunch you deserve to wash dishes.

“Corruption and crony capitalism are cancers on society that continue to grow if not constantly addressed with harsh
measures.”
Who are these cronies? Why not begin a list?
You know, for when the bill comes.
“The whole concept of economic growth is based on an ever growing trend of year over year increased production.”
Modernism.
One line beforehand:
“the question remains as to when and what the new rules will be.” Traditionalism. Localism.
That these people are blind to that option show it is the way it must go.
“By removing the incentive for people to save and encouraging risk we have eroded the quality of economic growth.”
And people.
This will be a hard reset selecting for character. The question is what character.
“in short, we have to move forward faster in each coming year just to keep growing.”
Carlin’s Circling the Drain
“All this underlines that we are living in “interesting times” while playing havoc with the value of things and what they are worth”
Speak for China.

Patriotism for which country, is the political question? Which principles governing which country and which policies from which time periods? That is all the NRx, Alt Right and other traditionalist groups are discussing.
The Fall of the Empire is a given, but how do we replace it without losing our living standard?
Who wants to go Amish or Sharia?

comment
“Do you supposed that America is cursed for not praising God in spirit and truth anymore, but rather in vain?”
You must abandon God before God abandons you. You don’t notice this…until you know it.
America became the nexus of decadence, rewarding degenerate citizens. They deserve to collapse.

Demographics is the science economics wishes it could be.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/why-world-economy-likely-collapse-1-simple-chart
I once read a theory that humans do sense impending disasters like other animals.
However, this is reflected in our breeding habits, because we don’t want to lower overall family fitness and lose everyone by increasing strain with a baby’s constant needs. In a war, the crying also makes you hard to miss. I never forgot it and I think there is something to it. Even Guardianista are delaying childbearing because of a deep, gut feeling it’s a bad idea right now. Babies make you easier to enslave because you can be threatened and protecting them places the mothers out in the open or other dangerous positions. Especially if the family is on welfare or otherwise incapable of feeding itself, the hosts will all die. Those adopting foreign babies are playing both sides – whoever wins, they do.
It is no coincidence 65IQ Muslims breed like rabbits in Europe – they plan on many of them dying.
As long as the West contains pre-war native levels, we are fine. Baby Boomers are surplus to requirement. We can rebuild along Empire lines with Empire numbers. There is greater IQ DENSITY per individual, nobody other than the West has this advantage, so sub-replacement isn’t as terminal for us as it would be for other races. This assumes good operations, healthy society.
Part of the reason so many Indian and Arab men are coming here – they sense good pickings of women.
Whether we’re game or not.
They underestimate the ancient spirit, even of the women. Whites have been in slumber a long time. Like an angry bear in a cave stirring. The Boomers didn’t have enough kids, another pressure onto the heap of burning grievance. To do what a brood used to. When the middle-class Marxists realize Marx was a parasite and there’s no free food unless they’re the ones producing it – oh, the sea change will be a tidal wave. Students turning on the lying teachers who burdened them with debt for the privilege.
“These trends are about to get much worse, from an economic and consumption standpoint.”
Civilized peoples aren’t supposed to keep reproducing this much, nukes have made typical war corrections redundant.
A compact society of high-IQ and high-skilled is most flexible to political and long-term social change.
Europe is the most compact for our quality.
We can even drop to Industrial Revolution levels or possibly agrarian before that.
What about India? China? Can you picture Dubai without trucks of water and expensive lipsticks for the whores?
MENA will experience Full Malthus. The r-types sense this and try to flee, but they are the first wave of locusts, ironically they trigger the events. Do you really think the mixed race will remain here when times get tough? They’ll flee where resources are cheap – real home i.e. Pakistan, Afghanistan, India etc. Rats swim as the ship sinks, they don’t wait around.
They know the natives will want a return on their civic investment but they’ll soon discover their charity needs to be
recouped somehow.
“All the interest rate cuts and debt has been undertaken under the paradigm that it would be more easily repaid in the future…but now we’ve come to “the future” where there are fewer of us to service the debt, buy homes, buy cars, consume our way to prosperity…or pay the taxes to keep the social systems solvent.”
In the post-war period – they had one job. Fuck enough to make plenty of kids.
They failed and that’s why evolution says they deserve to starve to death. Not the young they robbed of the same youth they enjoyed at the expense of the blood of their own elders. They are grasshoppers without a fiddle and winter is coming.

speaking of, wasn’t this one of mine prescient?

“Absent a growing population of young to buy their assets (IRA’s, homes, etc.), we have a small problem (central bank asset purchases to the rescue).”
Ponzis collapse spectacularly. Billionaires won’t buy in the suburbs.

#NOBAILOUTSFORBOOMERS

“The implications economically, financially, societally, etc. etc. of a collapsing population of young and soaring older
population should be ringing alarm bells…but instead our politicians seem officially mindless (or intentionally misleading the populace) in the face of a cataclysmic shift.”
They’re fucking vampires and a stake should be driven through their black hearts for selling us into slavery for a few tacky holidays and wife-swapping fuckparties. They even want our blood’s proteins to stay youthful and fuck us over longer. We’d be farmed if they could, they’re sociopaths.
The elderly of our time are (in general) deserving of DIS-respect.

Here it gets juicy.

comment
“Someone should do something about those goddam africans….”
Just wall the whole continent off and let them either kill another or evolve. Leave them a hundred or two years.
Technology won’t save you, as libertarians are discovering.
We don’t have food, but we have 3D printers!
Nobody mentions food security.
We have become feeders, suppliers of the Third World. When the tax money stops filtering to the evil NGO complex, they’ll come find us to collect the caloric jizzya.
“That’s why they are called Jungle bunnies, they breed like rabbits.”
“The sooner it collapses the better for us young people. I want time to rebuild a little wealth after the previous
generations’ combined fuck up ruins everything before im too old to do anything useful”
The question becomes, what can’t they steal like Cyprus?
Franklin said to empty your purse into your head and then no man could take it.
Wise advice.
As for who dies first, the fatties.
The Government knows this and is hastening the process. How?
They know the book Nudge.
EITHER they lose the fat and become more productive, costing less too OR they let reaction formation kick in and eat themselves to death, also saving the state money.
I feel like the only person seeing this.
“Planned obsolescence has meant ‘consumption’ is at artificially high levels to begin with IMO.”
This includes people.
Tell me, which races have the greatest tendency to fat-store?
It isn’t the whitey, is it?
“Meantime the main problem is where to live. Most white people are still asleep, and you don’t want to live near them because they tend to get upset when their eyes are open.”

There is nowhere to run. New Zealand is now getting problems. White Flight is finished.

On feminism:
“Human fecundity is inversely proportional to female literacy rates. Compulsory education is killing us.”
reply “Yeah, once the wimmin learned blowjobs and masturbation in school it was all over for civilization.”
Mentioned only yesterday (as of writing), it isn’t a reproduction problem, and from all this it isn’t a problem. It’s preparation. The reproduction problem was a marriage problem. You should ban sexual entitlement. There is only the exclusive conjugal right.
Allowing people to spill their seed all over the place means they don’t reproduce, they take measures against it.
“Yes the obvious solution of too much government is to get government more involved in everyone’s lives, forcibly sterilizing people. We’ve had TOO MUCH freedom, see? It’s not that government and politicians made promises they can’t keep.”
It’s already dysgenic except for abortion and euthanasia.
Why not full eugenic?
“Just get rid of sec 8 and foodstamps. You’re on your own. It can’t happen all at once, but we need to slowly transition that way. These people with no skills should be out working farms in rural areas anyway because we shouldn’t be shipping food 1000s of miles around the globe before it gets to us. They never should have been herded into the cities in the first place. And if you don’t like your station in life, tough. Get some skills. Education is free on the internet these days. There are plenty of libraries. And if you think your poverty gives you the right to get violent and rob people you should be put to death. We used to hang horse thieves, not give them room and board and then welfare. The problem is not too many people. The problem is too many people think everyone deserves access to resoures they don’t own simply because those people exist.”
Like I said in why practically is the Left dead? abolishing the death penalty made a life of crime a possibility and we pay for those aggression genes to breed! A little eugenics required just to get back the old levels!
Resources are placed there by people who earned them, unless they buy on credit. Stealing property is a theft of the owner’s section of mortality to pay for it. Resources are individual, collective only to a family level based on CONSENT.

“Put all hot females in breeding camps and have the most fit males inseminate them then then pay people to raise them. Stupid, genetically damaged animals shouldn’t breed.”

Forced breeding? Like animals?

It’s disturbing how often people seriously suggest rape in civilization, the genetic theft worse than an object. Only the top .1% of men would be required for that, the rest could easily be exterminated like termites. What are the odds the guys suggesting it fit into that bracket when they can’t get, keep and satisfy a single woman? It would also require perfect IQ scores, and many making those suggestions are Third World trash stock. The odds are not in your favour if you had the shit for brains to comprehend them. White women are not your obedient concubines. And the fathers need to stick around to parent or the kids end up damaged, how many want to fuck and run? Fucking r-types, there’s a reason Patriarchy hanged them, they deserved it. Shit for brains and matching morals, just bestial.
They also seem to think Patriarchy means rape when it’s protection FROM rape by fathers and brothers.
Women have 9 months to abort and will out of spite, do not fuck with us. Reproduction must be consensual or men, for example, can easily be cucked.
Punish those who deliberately fuck/breed with inferiors. Especially social isolation. Let them become Morlocks.
The Great Replacement is supposed to distract us from the real need to clean house.
Let’s send all the liberals and bleeding heart celebrity luvvies to Africa once SHTF. They’ll be the only white meat, very moist.
“The writer of this article doesnt seem to understand that the niggers in Africa will literally eat each other if big problems start in the west or Asia. They cant even comprehend basic private property rights and we are to assume they will continue to pump out kids after the free shit from the west stops flowing. There is a reason why niggers didnt massively outbreed civilized folk before we showed up, that shit didnt just fall out of the sky. On top of that, once the medical technology or expertise the west provides to Africa disappears, theyll go back to dieing before theyre even twenty fucking one. I cannot stand these fucking idiots that somehow think Africa became so populous in a vacuum. These charts that try to predict the future are fucking retarded and so is anybody that gives them even a second glance.”
China is shipping human flesh, as mentioned. Whose flesh, is the question?
Outbreed actually means miscegenerate, not to overpopulate.
The white farmers sense the danger and want to move. If your ancestors are dumb enough to move in with savages who believe in cannibalism, please stay there. The gene pool will get a good clean of long-overdue stupidity.
The nitrogen fertilizer is required from the West, the chemical knowledge to produce it, even were the African farmers (real Africans) to suddenly all learn farming and grow a new continental personality. They’re lazier than Italians in July.

The British Empire was a mistake because it was the African Empire and the SJWs get that right. However, we don’t owe them jack. We gave them too much. We need a compound interest on our investment and we’ll step over their corpses once they’ve all killed one another in a probably religious cull back to sensible population levels.
civilize or economize, motherfuckers

It’s very easy to recoup your losses from a dead body.

This whole comment, damn that’s some Super-Fine research, segments;
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/why-world-economy-likely-collapse-1-simple-chart#comment-8862487
“It’s true. In the age of exploration, western anthropologists found food to cannibal tribes in a 2:1 ratio along the major african rivers. Food Cannibal Food Food Cannibal Food Food Cannibal….”
“A single man single woman household is something that evolved in North Western Europe during the last ice age. Women had to be beautiful (to show fertility) and able to bear and raise children in the harsh ice climate; men needed to be robust to hunt for long periods.
There are some 30,000 years of differential evolution between Africa and Western Europeans. Isn’t it likely there will be differences?”
Evolution doesn’t stop at the neck, ever.
“This time, the African’s – rather than eating each other, will just walk or boat into Europe.”
Not with British naval supremacy, mate. We can save Europe or just ourselves. I’m waiting to see where my stake is.
“Quote from A troublesome inheritance” A gentleman and a scholar. Tally ho.
Evolution is made by fucking yes but 2/3 up to 75% mostly by killing. This goes for any species, we’ve delayed Darwinism and defied natural selection for so long it’s going to be swooping Death. Hopefully Black Death will go on a comeback tour. I’m such a fan.
History won’t smile kindly on the African uplifters, including the original missionaries. Fucking idiots.
Slavery killed the Empires, thinking those inferior enough to allow conquest deserve a seat at the feast.
Those are your resources for your genetic kin. Do not assist the outgroup or you die.
The Victorians ignored this to fuck the available Oriental and African women. Once again, lust destroys anything good. If they couldn’t fuck slaves, they wouldn’t want to invade or keep them. As bad as the Ottomans in places.
Asia will go back to rice farming if they’re smart.
Otherwise, more crazy Emperors and Communism.
Leave them to it. They’re bloodthirsty in those harsh times anyway.
“Analysis of genomes from around the world establishes that there is indeed a biological reality to race, despite the official statements to the contrary of leading social science organizations. A longer discussion of this issue is offered in chapter 5, but an illustration of the point is the fact that with mixed-race populations, such as African Americans, geneticists can now track along an individual’s genome and assign each segment to an African or European ancestor, an exercise that would be impossible if race did not have some basis in biological reality.”
They haven’t mentioned the mixed-race psychiatric problem. When you hear ‘mental health issues’ check the status of the person talking. Oh, an evolutionally novel combination? High genetic load? No wonder it goes wrong. It’s like randomly mixing botanical extracts. Odds are you’ll end up with poison. Most mutations aren’t bad but fatal. Not always for the host but the host nation.
“The Cro-Magnon. Our ancestors. Athletic enough and intelligent enough to beat off H.Neanderthal. That we are not as robust as Cro Magnpn I assume is the result of changing sexual preferences and the value placed upon the effete aristocracy.”
Wars where only the fit fight and die. If it were equal and all fighting-age men went, that would be different.
Hardier men would develop in a few generations.
More dimorphism so also softer better-looking women too.
It isn’t just the breeding of the white peoples, it’s the quality!
“Lucky for us I don’t think demons can feed off robotic energy. Right? You got to keep some of the livestock alive to breed and raise the next generation?”
Rabbit farming, except the rabbits are the farmers. Who will guard them? Who is without bad blood? At that intergenerational level only blood pays for blood, only justice can be served before anything else.
This post turned really dark but it’s interesting.
At least as a thought experiment.
It reminds me of that tourist story where the Africans demanded children because there was no food and they were hungry. Now the question is, how long until they demand white children in Europe like Aztec sacrifices (no current leader in the big countries has a child among them!) and will they demand from the largest number group, the Muslims?
It would pay dividends to have two historic enemies destroy one another, to have the African eat the Arab and then dispense with the lower IQ remnants for the crime. History is cruel so that will likely play out.
I don’t like it but peaceable solutions are running low. Bear in mind, it takes about three weeks to starve. A year or two and enough cycles of hunger will have reduced their numbers drastically.
They are locusts near a food source, they salt the earth in effect.
If Africa weren’t so huge in real cartographical terms, they’d have gone extinct long ago.
South Europe is particularly screwed but they deserve it. Fail to protect your borders, get invaded. Like the Russians, the North has a secret weapon in the climate and our ability to banish. One harsh winter is all it will take and like in Game of Thrones, they will go South, where food is plentiful. Italians still butcher their food. They’ll be fine.
What do the runners want to replace this with? Chaos is an excuse.

“central banks operate in fiat.. which means fake… but they always prepare a new one in a new country when they have the current one set to collapse… think China now… .RUssia has always been the outlier.”
“Think for a moment of the thirty to fifty years of Suppressed Technology, Military Tech, Alternative Free Energy & Life Extension Tech that has been with held from Public Knowledge.”
“And, since Africa has 9 of the 10 lowest IQ countries in the world (and the average IQ of the whole continent is approx 75) the only population growth, on the planet, will be coming from people who would, on average, be regarded as mentally retarded in the US and Europe…. So it is even worse than the above maths indicates.”

Data? How dare you reply to emotion with reason!
“Wow – white folks are doing a great job “saving” Africa. Kudo’s. Too bad the God will have the final say on Africans.”
Mother Nature May I?
“Why can’t Africa produce something and be a net positive? Why would they be excluded from world population?”
Because you don’t count dependents as adults.
There is no need to import the low IQ or keep slaves minus sex slavery (rape) since robots came in.
So this coming Empire of Who-Knows-Who might be different.
A religion will rise though. Without the State mandating charity at the point of a gun. Christianity might be it as long as we remember compassion has survival limits.
The EU is failing because it believed egalitarian cog theory. The idea is you can be a lazy fuck and retire early as long as there’s some sap to replace you. You can’t replace the high-IQ with the low.
They become a greater drain by far. Then there’s the family they bring over…
On this vast scale, regression to the mean is law. Low-IQ becomes a chaotic entropy.
Europe has been suppressing its fertility and ability for decades. We’re overdue a resurgence of prosperity.
Do you think we’ll want to share?
Do the luvvies want to pay Commie taxes?
Smith was right, ‘human beings are a virus’. The r-selected, that is.
Equilibrium will come to you like Samael.
“which makes the remaining population wealthier on a per capita basis.”
It’s the Golden Goose ratio. More producers, more production on average minus the genocidal policies and disincentives and fewer drains = retention of wealth, compounding.
Foreign charity, the soft imperialism, gave the grandchildren’s birthright away because that anorexic attention whore Audrey Hepburn couldn’t stand to see African children thinner than her. Meanwhile, her own money went entirely to her own spawn. She didn’t surrender any to her own state, let alone the foreign.
Any suggestion of pathologically altruistic policy should be met with: YOU FIRST.
That wealth would have compounded nicely by now. Imagine no debt at birth but an investment. Sweet.
You don’t raise awareness, you raise funds. Other people’s funds. By attention-whoring, middle-class begging to grind down the working class, it’s classist, it kills the homeland competition. They know they’re doing it, they never do local charity work with the poor because they detest them.
You’re not Mother Theresa, she also took other people’s money despite dodgy origins. How nice of her.
End virtue signalling the assholes partake in like a traitorous sport and they’ll quickly find something else to do.
If you want to uplift another country so badly, you should be forced to move there. Also, petition to deport all white Muslims to Saudi Arabia, since it’s so peaceful and not at all Islamophobic. Hold them to the consequences, HARD.
Africa “have yet to pollute their lands because they aren’t yet industrialized.”
False, China recently bought Africa, including its people and nobody cares. Asians are ruthless in destroying natural
resources, look at Japan.
“And most importantly, they are over there and you are over here; they aren’t bothering you at all so why do you care how many babies and by whom that they have?”
~facepalm~
Why cuck for them? Why? Note mentioning the savagery, the rape, the cannibalism, the murder and political corruption triggers them. AKA the Truth.
He goes on!
“Africa has *plenty* of room to grow, that is why so many indians and chinese are moving their. Those two groups are like cockroaches (especially the chinese). They’ve overbred and they’re overcrowding their filthy countries so they emigrate and africa is slowing being taken over by them — so they can destroy those countries too. Africans aren’t bothering anyone; for the most part they stay on their continent and don’t bother anyone.”
Excellent, all Asians can move to Africa and Africans stay there because open borders and avoiding evil Whitey with our demon science.
He’s right about the Chinese though. People are only nice about them because of food. The food is terrible, you have bad taste America. Anytime someone says their favorite food is Chinese, you can ignore them. They eat cardboard with soy.

It’s true that India and China are fucked in unique ways. India will kill itself with the excess male population. China might go down with a fight but I don’t care as long as their cunty new millionaire ‘Princesses’ are sold to Islamic State.
The parents care about money and baby, it might happen.
Traps need bait.
If we want to conquer terrorism, feed them Chinese.
They have the biggest glut of population and no low-IQ excuse.
“Those Muslim groups that claim they will defeat the west by producing many more children paid for by full public assistance seem to understand this.”
That only works if you’re the minority sucking off the state. The ratio? They can’t do math.
Those ‘men’ bred from weak mothers will run off as soon as they’re expected to throw a punch. Notice they never do fist-fights? They’re cowards. Even suicide must be quick to them. The women will also leave but only after trying to whore themselves to dhimmi white men. We already see this with Indians because of their caste system, Muslim women also HATE (all caps) white beauty.
“Not to mention that major universities are shaming young white males for getting erections. Hillary kept warning about how the Pubs wanted to turn back the clock, but haven’t the Dems reinvented Victorianism?”
White men aren’t allowed to act black.
Case – closed.
“The green revolution prevented what would have otherwise been regular famines by now. The green revolution requires massive petroleum inputs to continue providing food for a global population of this size. It is not a sustainable proposition for the world population to continue growing. Perhaps the planet population peaking voluntarily is much better than the other alternatives.”
SANITY!
Let me love you!
Famines are cleanses for the colon of humanity.
“World population will never exceed 9 billion. … It can take less than 3 generations to become extinct.”
Shorter if you castrate and sterilize your enemies. History is fun.
That’s from the Muslim playbook!
“The big problem I see is plague. At a certain point of overpopulation, diseases start to spread, and that can be a really, really nasty way to solve the population problem.”
u r b a n l i v i n g
Such a misnomer.
These people can’t grow radishes.
“Once white people took up socialism they bought into its promises and they stopped having large families (who would have supported them if there was no government support). Add to this abortion and the pill and white people in America and Europe did not produce enough tax payers to support the socialist Ponzi scheme”
s e x u a l  r e v o l u t i o n

Promiscuity kills. Syphilis is coming back. There’s your zombie apocalypse. It rots your fucking face off. Your balls can literally drop off, like raisins. It’s like infective frostbite for your squishy bits.
It also makes the infected rabid. Insane. Sounds like a nice Apocalypse we got brewing.
If the sex-obsessed could be shipped off to an island and once sterilized, spend the rest of their lives fucking each other without medication, under the condition that they never bother the breeding population again or return, we’d ‘lose’ their genetics in a hundred years or so. And never have this issue again.

It’d be something incredulously disbelieved in history books. The Human Bonobos.
It’s like full drug legalization, that had a culling effect. Then after-WW2 only doctors could write prescriptions and we started getting more dross surviving. Let the bachelor alcoholics die in misery.
It’s a great example for the kids. Kids need negative role models, to see them suffer, more than any positive ones.

“There were 76 million people born between the years 1946 and 1964, the traditional window for the baby boom generation. That means that they will retire over a 19-year period. Simple math shows that 76 divided by 19 is 4 million, or almost 11,000 people a day. Say 1,000 die a day. The biggest event in America today is we have l0,000 Baby Boomers retiring each day for years to come. The biggest problem in America is we cannot for the duration support these retiring Baby Boomers. The reason we cannot support these baby boomers is we have not produced a large enough group of supporting taxpayers.”

Well the ones who didn’t have kids because they were too selfish won’t have anyone to defend them against the local marauder rapist gangs.

“Why are Muslims the primary people imported? Muslims don’t have abortions, take the pill and Muslim women are not single moms. It is not uncommon for Muslims to have the 6 to 10 children like white families used to have in America. Congress is counting on this group to generate the missing tax payers.”

Simply ban child brides and mutilation (circumcision removes incentive to be a slut). Pass them free contraception on the quiet, especially shots or implants while their father is away. Feminism will kill the Muslim, freedom isn’t for everyone.

Encourage every Muslim to become SJW. The Unis are doing this already.

Corrosive pop culture will westernize them, fund some Rihanna. Technically they are single mothers since there is a paternal failure to provide. They get disability which matches the IQ, a great excuse to boot them wherever we like. This is assuming they don’t place the dhimmi SJWs in the old Nazi camps once they become useless.

Possible.

“Why is America a bankrupt government? Revenue from current taxes is too low to pay for increasing entitlements and retirees. Deficits and debt plug the entitlement hole until immigrants produce enough taxes to fill the entitlement hole . Government is betting immigrants will produce the taxes to pay for retiring Baby Boomers before America goes belly up. Once the U.S. world reserve currency runs out and the government can no longer print bucket loads of money and debt they will strip the U.S. citizens cupboards bare to keep going.”

You can’t tax work that doesn’t happen.
They immigrate to make more money than they wish to provide the state.
You’ve been played.
I was once told, as many others “you’re entitled to NOTHING, nothing you didn’t earn. And that becomes yours, nobody else can give it or take it away.” The last part was naive but hearing entitlements makes me wanna reach for a hammer.

‘”Overpopulation” is not a problem, nor will it ever be. The global population will never exceed 9 billion, for which this planet is amply capable of sustaining. Paul Erlich predicted overpopulation would lead to human extinction by 1990. Real world studies have shown that this is not possible. Overpopulation is just another scare tactic by the left.’

Has a point, they only ever say breeding is a problem when whites do it, eh?

Guess the race. You can’t check, but it’s manospherian PUA rapist logic at work, you can totally guess.

“Why do you even *care* about what’s going on with Africans in AFRICA? They aren’t trying to rob you or sleep with your daughters or sign up for foodstamps. Yet that’s what is being discussed. If they want to have tons of babies, chuck spears, eat each other why do you care? They’re not doing it here, there doing it 1000’s of miles away from you.

Let’s face it; you poor put upon (mostly) white men need to stop crying about shit that doesn’t concern you. You whine about the pitifully small entitlements minorities get but most entitlements go to white people. And the biggest amount aren’t even called that — they’re called bailouts. Trillions of dollars to rich white bankers. But you focus on some poor black woman living in a dangerous ghetto, barely scraping by. You bunch of asshole, racist hypocrites. You’re the ones who created this mess, not the minorities who don’t have any power in this society.
Worry about your own limp, viagra dependent penises and stop worrying about what africans are doing with theirs.”

‘OMG why do you care about your genetic kin? Why do you CAAAARE? Always the same YYYYYY-ine.
Just let them be raped! They want that masculinity, running away is part of the ‘Game’!
They don’t want you White Man! Step aside and let the real men gang rape them! Celebrate that your race will die! Don’t be racist! p.s. send more foreign aid, our Cousin Chuck needs a new child bride’

Those who gain from the Gravy Train lie about it.
(((white))) bankers was the best bit
They act like they’re scraping by, off their own money. Money to one outgroup is less to the ingroup. It is DEPRIVATION that is the trick to genocide. It’s demographic theft between any group, race, sex, age etc.
Tragedy of the commons looms large in immigration issues. Less for the natives, less for the earners.
when called out;

“The EU is allowing those people to come there — the Northern Africans are not forcing their way in. Just like the rich, white, powerful people are allowing Mexicans to flood this country: because they want them here. Why, I don’t know but those people are invited and if they don’t want to deal with their uncontrolled growth, just stop letting them in.”

Well shooting them in our territorial waters is no different than shooting them on the land itself.
It isn’t like the water is lava and landing means they get to claim on the state lottery complete with free blond Swedish girls bouncing on their balls. I do mean ‘girl’. They’re disgusting parasites, that’s why their home country doesn’t want them. The NGO-fat lawyers run out of money and it’s down to local justice.
“Africa’s overpopulation ISN’T GOING TO STAY IN AFRICA”
We should teach them how to get to America and end in Canada. They want them, right?
Make lots of Little Congos?
Africa doesn’t cease to exist because you’re too blind to include their chart in your GLOBAL economic calculations.
It’s like studying STDs and missing the brothel down the street because Cindy gives you free BJs once a week.
Whatever it is, not science!
If they TALK about Africa, they have to DO something about Africa. They fear the NGOs. The right-wing is missing this.
Cameron promised to bonfire the Quangos (NGOs), voted in and suddenly went silent and got very cucked.
It isn’t specific charities like Greenpeace. Cui bono? Follow the money. Always, always NGOs!
Government will eat the People or People will kill the NGOs bribing Government. Simple.
“It is very simple, reduce the cost of government to every citizen and the population will increase if there is enough room available to be comfortable.Skinner and many other psychologists have demonstrated this principle with rats. Make a rat town, don’t overcrowd it, provide food that has to be worked for and reproduction will be normal for the species. Reduce the food or make it harder to get and the reproduction will decline.
Put the right amount of rats in a rat city and they will get along with each other and stick with raising a family and finding food. Put in too many rats and attacks against other rats will commence. (every rat needs a certain amount of space and food) The more rats that are added the rat fights get deadlier and the reproduction declines. If you keep adding rats some rats will become psychotic and some will become psychopaths.
Nowadays the people who should be having children can’t afford them so they fiddle with their phones instead of their spouse or girl friend. Who do you think will have the most children; a couple on a farm or ranch who work from before sun-up until after sundown to get ahead or a couple of snowflakes who live in a crowded city with high rents working an 8 to 5 low paying menial job in a small office. The liberals have tried to move everyone into the cities since the 1960’s and maybe now they see the result. As long as the government moves people into the cities and burdens them with high rents, high food prices and high taxes and little living space that population will not grow.”
“only the smarts will have jobs”
money*
only the high-IQ will have money
make money, keep money
Why do they think the productive keep a census? It’s a list of citizens.

The Left has committed hari-kari. It’s Mike the Headless Chicken.
It’s dead but it hasn’t stopped being a fucking nuisance yet.
If you don’t breed, you’re like the dodo or the panda, on the dead side of history.

Cultural Marxism’s pets are coming home to roost and they’re hungry.

Let the animals eat the zookeeper. It’s nature, they’re pacifists, let it happen.
Don’t help them. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

You see a feminist being beaten up by a Muslim Sharia Patrol?

You go, Girl!

You can’t match the objectification of Olga, who doesn’t have a brain… or a head.
http://www.stufftoblowyourmind.com/blogs/behold-headless-woman.htm
Yes, it’s an illusion.

The Left is already totally irrelevant. The end of liberalism and the beginning of fascist bannings.
When you make speech laws like the Inquisition’s blasphemy code in a democracy, people just stop talking to you because they don’t want to go to prison. They also stop listening and talk among themselves.
The internet is a symptom not the cause.
Lefties never go to pubs, all the best political conversation isn’t happening in cock-tail bars.
They choose to socially exclude themselves from the working class, and SJW-ism is just pissing on the working class.

We recently decided the best way to fuck with the Left is never have a conversation with them. Play dumb as they think we are, ignore them and move away to other things and people as they speak. Distract them, cut them off, reduce signalling to nil value. They get louder and more virulent in their sedition, openly calling for the end of white people and heterosexuality, it’s funny if it weren’t horrifying. This is happening in the media writ large but it began socially, first with SJW topics and slowly into the economic. We don’t want advice from someone with a trust fund, which, btw, they will lose.

Nobody deserves to be poor but an SJW.

Anytime you see a leftie, be grey. Greyman protocol. Swim in the crowd. They are looking for righties to trigger at and relieve their anxiety. Block them from social media if they get uppity and try to info-gather. Use the same echo chamber stuff on them but only agaisnt them.
They want a target, they want families to break up and teenagers to shout at. They want someone to blame.
Give them nothing. They grew up on empty praise and attention.
Silence, the yawn of being ignored, is HELL, it is torture to the narcissist.
They are forced to turn on the fellow middle-class, exposing the Beast of their rage, or else one another. It was a matter of time.
Do not engage. We have won the debate based on the elections, the Overton window is ours and there is no debate to be had with ‘hate speech’ for science and people who refuse common sense or rules of evolution, logical. Listening to them gives them the public platform. They can’t buy eyeballs or ears. Do not give them and observers the respect of a peer.
They want to end you and your way of life. Let them starve, go Galt on attention whores.

K-shift is coming, friends.