Genographic Southeast Asia

https://voices.nationalgeographic.org/2015/04/21/genographic-southeast-asia/

Oh look, more migrations they try to shoehorn into Out of Africa but actually fits Multiregional better.

I am shocked at the continual efforts to bury lies with genetic truth.

Over half of SE Asian males? At least the Yellow Fever acolytes have new reading material.

For exactly what type of cuck they are, on a precise genetic level.

Microcephalin and racial brain size

The skulls thing was popular so here.
*gestures wildly*

http://evoandproud.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/the-riddle-of-microcephalin.html

So what is going on? Perhaps the derived Microcephalin allele helps us on a mental task that IQ tests fail to measure. Or perhaps it boosts intelligence in some indirect way that shows up in differences between populations but not in differences between individuals.

What would the term for that be?

The second explanation is the one favored in a recent study byWoodley et al. (2014). The authors found a high correlation (r = 0.79) between the incidence of this allele and a population’s estimated mean IQ, using a sample of 59 populations from throughout the world.

They also found a correlation with a lower incidence of infectious diseases, as measured by DALY (disability adjusted life years). They go on to argue that this allele may improve the body’s immune response to viral infections, thus enabling humans to survive in larger communities, which in turn would have selected for increased intelligence:

Hello, Mutation Load!

Come on down!

And since the brain has been proven part of the immune system since, the theory holds.
The Ice Age hypothesis in A Troublesome Inheritance appears to hold weight, the notion of tribal bonding. Altruism is only pathological if its exertion harms your genetic kin, your ingroup.

There are plenty of HBD blogs, people. Read!

Genetics? In science? What is this witchcraft! Both medical studies and hips don’t lie. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-11-african-american-women-diabetes-higher-er-neg.html

Turns out Africans in particular have terrible health out of the environment they evolved for.
Maybe racism has just been migration this entire time.
If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree…

Morton’s skulls were accurate

Whenever a credentialed idiot is ‘debunking’ a famous genius on their life’s work, they’re probably lying to get famous. Media twits.

http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001071&type=printable

Part of the reason I don’t go on about myself, people I’ve spoken to and met, is that I don’t want those appeals to authority to bias you in favour or against an argument.

As one study rarely proves anything major (it is possible with top-notch methodology) one nitwit with a keyboard (I am fully aware of the irony) does not debunk shit.

The point is to keep looking.
Only a liar would dissuade you from looking, because they know the truth won’t match up to what they told you.
The reason banned books should not be banned.

Video: Race and IQ

It’s a forbidden truth because scientism holds all natural things to be good.
Bizarrely, while denying Nature and uplifting Nurture….

I don’t know how well the naturalistic fallacy holds up to dolphin rape, I admit.

Comments are interesting.

I’m still uncomfortable with a philosopher (however intellectually honest) speaking for scientists, especially precise ones like psychometrics and genetics. It’s not as bad as physicists thinking they understand psychology (side-eyes Kaku), when they’re fundamentally opposed intellectual systems, not nearly as horrendous as that. It’s mildly unpleasant. He could phone interview ‘anonymous conservative’ or video interview Wade, acclaimed science expert and author of A Troublesome Inheritance, which didn’t get enough traction. Bruce Charlton would be a golden interview for the ages, you’d have about a year to cover everything superficially.

Jayman might interview, audio. He’s a well-known HBD writer, up there with HBD chick, who seems friendly on twitter.

John Haidt is a wildcard.
Ah, but what a wildcard!

I would pay to see Zizek. Let him go totally off-piece. Just let him, it’s performance ART.
(Ask him about lies in the media, including scientism, I know he’s good on it).

You could get the Asian guy who did the racial beauty study.
Satoshi Kanazawa
He mentions the phenomena of genetic load, the mutations that affect beauty (they also affect IQ). There’s a strong IQ/beauty correlate.
http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/articles/Kanazawa,%20Satoshi.%20%22Why%20Are%20Black%20Women%20Less%20Physically%20Attractive%20Than%20Other%20Women%3F%22%20Psychology%20Today,%20May%2015,%202011.pdf
It was so false they blackballed him ever since.

Those would be my recommendations. 

Update: after a conversation about this interview with someone from a very illustrious academic family (members have their own wiki page), the reason his plea will fall on deaf ears is simple – to appreciate truth, you must understand its full complexity and that requires IQ. Expecting a simpler person to act like NOT-simpler person is a category mistake. What you appreciate is a lesser-known aspect of IQ e.g. classical music fans are likelier to be high IQ. This informs the signalling of a 9yo desperately trying to play Mozart. This emphasis on the appearance of substance to obtain superficial goals e.g. Ivy admission, is a key example of mala fides. Technical ability (as in those stupid ego competitions that should be banned) is an empty shell without a love and appreciation of the art. You do it because you love it, not because you might get Another Fucking Trophy and a new shiny line on your CV. FACTProfessional music auditions are held blind!

Point, the second: democracy in a multicultural society is impossible, too many warring factions that rentseek.

We have a kakistocracy. 

We are ‘led by shit’ or ‘led by the shit’ as in, the bottom section of society is loud and mob-rule enough to be the swing voters in elections and the likes of BBC Three celebrities are setting public topics. The populations of these people used to be naturally controlled by disease, including syphilis, poor nutrition and then war.

This inverted hierarchy makes improvements impossible to enforce because such aversion to the ‘politics of envy’ must come from the top-down.

This is like asking a vegan for their best rib recipe. If they knew, they wouldn’t tell you – because now they hate you.”

or another gem from this person

Everyone says about the ‘fucking elves’, ha ha, but if you had a choice, you’d be a fucking elf. You know it and if you deny it you’re a fucking liar.” re Tolkien 

To which I replied, if you must know, “so a Dwarf, then?”

Want us to trust experts again? We need respectable ones, with good private conduct to boot and fine appreciation faculties, otherwise they’re parrots of the rich and powerful.

Tesla’s family origins

This appears to check out, based on historical migration patterns and naming convention.

http://researchomnia.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/the-neolatin-genius-of-nicola-tesla_8.html

Why do Americans try to do European history?

We can scarcely cope. We have to check which war we mean, there are that many.

Any improvement on this theory, link me, bitches.

Update: would it be so hard to mass-test a bunch of relatives?

https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/34432-Nikola-Tesla-was-not-I2a-but-R1a

Avoiding the word ‘race’

http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp489-fs16/files/2012/08/Race-in-anthropology.pdf

Things a scientist wouldn’t do.

Imagine being so scared of the truth posed by harder sciences that you try to flip the cause and effect.

As in, that biology is shaped by culture.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.20983/abstract

That isn’t how evolution works. That’s really what it is, evolutionary denial.

White weeaboo people don’t spontaneously give birth to an Asian kid, do they?

The harder science wins, in this case, the mathematics of genetics.
When they compare intragroup, they rarely factor in the genetic admixture of many groups e.g. Africans living in America. This contaminates their group result.

Note a trend with these papers

https://www.anthropology.northwestern.edu/documents/people/di_leonardo.pdf

No such thing as whiteness, or an ever-changing and expanding definition of White.

They’d never dare pull that with any other racial category. The term is erasure. It’s white erasure.

This isn’t some sociology hokum you can talk your way around. Yet we see attempts.

Official statements try to minimize the evidence.

Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic “racial” groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. source

Only?

ONLY?

In genetics, anything over 0.0001% is huge. That’s the medical standard of significance. They can’t call it insig. but they’re downplaying it (lying) for stupids who can’t do stats. Six percent is huge. Physical variation is the forensic meaning of race, yes, but note the labeling problem, the so-called. Okay, improve the naming convention but what you measure is still real. 94% is intended to throw you off by the anchoring effect. That’s a deliberate bias (fraud) where you fiddle with the context. For the same species, 94% is incredibly low. 

Bear in mind, we share 50-60% of our genetics with a BANANA.

The bleeding heart of the rest of that page shows you aren’t going to get an intellectually honest conversation out of the people funded by the taxpayer. Fine, don’t develop race-specific meds, it’s black people that’ll die since they’re less insured in the US. Denial of reality has fatal consequences. Deny race-specific illnesses too, since it’d be racist to diagnose and treat them, huh? Like, the original definition of scientific racism.

http://www.jewishgeneticdiseases.org/diseases/tay-sachs-disease/

But wait, there’s more!

bowing

http://whoami.sciencemuseum.org.uk/whoami/findoutmore/yourgenes/wheredidwecomefrom/whatareourclosestanimalrelatives

Our closest animal relatives are the great apes: chimpanzees, orangutans and gorillas. About 98% of the DNA in your genes is exactly the same as in chimpanzees, making you as closely related to a chimp as horses are to zebras. Chimps and humans share a common ancestor, who was probably swinging through the trees about 5 million years ago. Many other species of ape around at the same time eventually became extinct.

Yes, you read that right, you have more in common with a chimpanzee than some other races.

darwincontrol

Out of Africa false by genetics

http://www.academia.edu/1809315/Re-Examining_the_Out_of_Africa_Theory_and_the_Origin_of_Europeoids_Caucasoids_in_Light_of_DNA_Genealogy

https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566

Note the passive-aggressive tagging of “Out of Africa”.

Those are Austin Powers quotemarks.

It has literally never been true.

This is so easy to debunk with a single piece of negative evidence nobody honest in archaeology should be pushing it still. They’re behind Multi-Regional, the DNA and all the bones support that.

There was no Adam and Eve, it was a story told to people who didn’t know what germs were. It had to be simplified.

And they certainly didn’t live in Africa when Africa didn’t exist at the time.

The landmass was Pangea and there’s no reason for humans to spawn so far south.

Many disease-based reasons to be northern though.
They basically only studied Russians. More studies needed.

Abstract:

Seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of 46 subclades in 17 major haplogroups were considered in terms of their base (ancestral) haplotypes and timespans to their common ancestors, for the purposes of designing of time-balanced haplogroup tree. It was found that African haplogroup A (originated 132,000 ± 12,000 years before present) is very remote time-wise from all other haplogroups, which have a separate common ancestor, named β-haplogroup, and originated 64,000 ± 6000 ybp. It includes a family of Europeoid (Caucasoid) haplogroups from F through T that originated 58,000 ± 5000 ybp. A downstream common ancestor for haplogroup A and β-haplogroup, coined the α-haplogroup emerged 160,000 ± 12,000 ybp. A territorial origin of haplogroups α- and β-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south.

Haplogroup B is descended from β-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lateral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.

Under same tag

https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=42557

Reconsideration of the “Out of Africa” Concept as Not Having Enough Proof

aka bullshit.

This is an overview of the “Out of Africa” (OOA) concept and the concept is based upon experimental data. The article shows that said concept is based on data which are—as a rule—interpreted by the OOA proponents in a one-sided manner, that is to “prove” the OOA concept.

aka lying

The fact they had to admit to multiple migrations shows they’re covering their arses.

The article shows how recent OOA studies (as well as earlier ones) employ biased interpretations to artificially “prove” the OOA concept. The article shows that the same data can be—and more justifiably—interpreted as incompatible with the OOA concept, and giving support for a “into Africa” concept. It seems that from times of Neanderthals (seemingly having pale skin and fair hair, based on the identified Neanderthal MCR1 melanocortin receptor), our ancestors, of both Africans and non-Africans current populations, lived outside of Africa, apparently in Eurasia or maybe in Europe.