Tesla’s family origins

This appears to check out, based on historical migration patterns and naming convention.

http://researchomnia.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/the-neolatin-genius-of-nicola-tesla_8.html

Why do Americans try to do European history?

We can scarcely cope. We have to check which war we mean, there are that many.

Any improvement on this theory, link me, bitches.

Update: would it be so hard to mass-test a bunch of relatives?

https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/34432-Nikola-Tesla-was-not-I2a-but-R1a

Avoiding the word ‘race’

http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp489-fs16/files/2012/08/Race-in-anthropology.pdf

Things a scientist wouldn’t do.

Imagine being so scared of the truth posed by harder sciences that you try to flip the cause and effect.

As in, that biology is shaped by culture.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.20983/abstract

That isn’t how evolution works. That’s really what it is, evolutionary denial.

White weeaboo people don’t spontaneously give birth to an Asian kid, do they?

The harder science wins, in this case, the mathematics of genetics.
When they compare intragroup, they rarely factor in the genetic admixture of many groups e.g. Africans living in America. This contaminates their group result.

Note a trend with these papers

https://www.anthropology.northwestern.edu/documents/people/di_leonardo.pdf

No such thing as whiteness, or an ever-changing and expanding definition of White.

They’d never dare pull that with any other racial category. The term is erasure. It’s white erasure.

This isn’t some sociology hokum you can talk your way around. Yet we see attempts.

Official statements try to minimize the evidence.

Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic “racial” groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. source

Only?

ONLY?

In genetics, anything over 0.0001% is huge. That’s the medical standard of significance. They can’t call it insig. but they’re downplaying it (lying) for stupids who can’t do stats. Six percent is huge. Physical variation is the forensic meaning of race, yes, but note the labeling problem, the so-called. Okay, improve the naming convention but what you measure is still real. 94% is intended to throw you off by the anchoring effect. That’s a deliberate bias (fraud) where you fiddle with the context. For the same species, 94% is incredibly low. 

Bear in mind, we share 50-60% of our genetics with a BANANA.

The bleeding heart of the rest of that page shows you aren’t going to get an intellectually honest conversation out of the people funded by the taxpayer. Fine, don’t develop race-specific meds, it’s black people that’ll die since they’re less insured in the US. Denial of reality has fatal consequences. Deny race-specific illnesses too, since it’d be racist to diagnose and treat them, huh? Like, the original definition of scientific racism.

http://www.jewishgeneticdiseases.org/diseases/tay-sachs-disease/

But wait, there’s more!

bowing

http://whoami.sciencemuseum.org.uk/whoami/findoutmore/yourgenes/wheredidwecomefrom/whatareourclosestanimalrelatives

Our closest animal relatives are the great apes: chimpanzees, orangutans and gorillas. About 98% of the DNA in your genes is exactly the same as in chimpanzees, making you as closely related to a chimp as horses are to zebras. Chimps and humans share a common ancestor, who was probably swinging through the trees about 5 million years ago. Many other species of ape around at the same time eventually became extinct.

Yes, you read that right, you have more in common with a chimpanzee than some other races.

darwincontrol

Out of Africa false by genetics

http://www.academia.edu/1809315/Re-Examining_the_Out_of_Africa_Theory_and_the_Origin_of_Europeoids_Caucasoids_in_Light_of_DNA_Genealogy

https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566

Note the passive-aggressive tagging of “Out of Africa”.

Those are Austin Powers quotemarks.

It has literally never been true.

This is so easy to debunk with a single piece of negative evidence nobody honest in archaeology should be pushing it still. They’re behind Multi-Regional, the DNA and all the bones support that.

There was no Adam and Eve, it was a story told to people who didn’t know what germs were. It had to be simplified.

And they certainly didn’t live in Africa when Africa didn’t exist at the time.

The landmass was Pangea and there’s no reason for humans to spawn so far south.

Many disease-based reasons to be northern though.
They basically only studied Russians. More studies needed.

Abstract:

Seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of 46 subclades in 17 major haplogroups were considered in terms of their base (ancestral) haplotypes and timespans to their common ancestors, for the purposes of designing of time-balanced haplogroup tree. It was found that African haplogroup A (originated 132,000 ± 12,000 years before present) is very remote time-wise from all other haplogroups, which have a separate common ancestor, named β-haplogroup, and originated 64,000 ± 6000 ybp. It includes a family of Europeoid (Caucasoid) haplogroups from F through T that originated 58,000 ± 5000 ybp. A downstream common ancestor for haplogroup A and β-haplogroup, coined the α-haplogroup emerged 160,000 ± 12,000 ybp. A territorial origin of haplogroups α- and β-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south.

Haplogroup B is descended from β-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lateral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.

Under same tag

https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=42557

Reconsideration of the “Out of Africa” Concept as Not Having Enough Proof

aka bullshit.

This is an overview of the “Out of Africa” (OOA) concept and the concept is based upon experimental data. The article shows that said concept is based on data which are—as a rule—interpreted by the OOA proponents in a one-sided manner, that is to “prove” the OOA concept.

aka lying

The fact they had to admit to multiple migrations shows they’re covering their arses.

The article shows how recent OOA studies (as well as earlier ones) employ biased interpretations to artificially “prove” the OOA concept. The article shows that the same data can be—and more justifiably—interpreted as incompatible with the OOA concept, and giving support for a “into Africa” concept. It seems that from times of Neanderthals (seemingly having pale skin and fair hair, based on the identified Neanderthal MCR1 melanocortin receptor), our ancestors, of both Africans and non-Africans current populations, lived outside of Africa, apparently in Eurasia or maybe in Europe.

The Beauty of Loulan

What did Aryans look like? Here’s a famous Tocharian.

Another?

Tocharian woman 1900 BC found in China

“A Tocharian female mummy with long flaxen blonde hair, perfectly perserved in braided hair. Items of weaved material, identical to Celtic Cloth.”

from http://frontiers-of-anthropology.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/redheaded-tocharian-mummies-of-uyghir.html

It’s easy to show you when there are mummies available.

Link: Who were the ancient Aryans?

http://www.renegadetribune.com/aryan-genesis-part-1-ancient-aryans/

Interesting whether you believe it or not.

The Aryan race, or the concept of “Aryan” as a racial description of phenotype is not accurate. Aryan is both a linguistic tradition as well as a common culture, or rather a number of cultures which share the same common ancestry. Aryan also is a series of religious or folk beliefs that also have a common denominator. And the race which originally created the language, culture and religious roots of the descendants of the Aryans were of the Nordic race, based on both genetic, archaeological and living examples of peoples of Europe and the northern, more isolated regions of Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Northern India, Kurdistan in Iraq, Asia Minor and many other similar Near Eastern and Asiatic regions. Deceased examples of an Indo-European racial type that share religious, cultural and linguistic traditions in common with Old Persian, Hindu and especially Celtic and Germanic peoples from Europe were the Tocharians, whose best example are the Caucasian mummies of China, which wore Celtic tartan dress, ornamented their belongings with swastikas, bore tattoos with symbols consistent with all Indo-Europeans peoples, held religious items indicative of both India and Europe, and physically were tall, blonde and blue-eyed, or with red hair and a distinct Nordic racial type. DNA testing of the Caucasian Mummies of China, these very remains, show them as having the same DNA structure as those of Northwestern Europeans. However, there is a substantial percentage of their DNA that has no known affiliates among the modern human population. New Age fanatic David Wilcock, made the claim on History Channel’s Ancient Aliens series that because there is no known populations on Earth sharing this percentage of DNA, it must out of necessity be of extraterrestrial origin! No, it just means that there was another human population, another kindred white race which died out millennia ago and has no existing descendants.

Not all blond and light-eyed, surely.

http://european-celtichistory.weebly.com/

https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/mythsofbritishancestry

The orthodox view of the origins of the Celts turns out to be an archaeological myth left over from the 19th century. Over the past 200 years, a myth has grown up of the Celts as a vast, culturally sophisticated but warlike people from central Europe, north of the Alps and the Danube, who invaded most of Europe, including the British Isles, during the iron age, around 300 BC.

Tools were found to prove this.
Invade? Not necessarily.

The swirling style of decoration is immortalised …

uhuh

But unfortunately for this orthodoxy, these artistic styles spread generally in Europe as cultural fashions, often made locally. There is no evidence they came to Britain and Ireland as part of an invasion.

Find what’s wrong with that sentence. So eager to erase white tribal histories.

The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.

Occam’s Razor – no evidence of invasion, suggesting at least some originated here.

 For the idea of the south German “Empire of the Celts” to survive as the orthodoxy for so long has required determined misreading of texts by Caesar, Strabo, Livy and others.

really
next sentence

And the well-recorded Celtic invasions of Italy across the French Alps from the west in the 1st millennium BC

why lie
why
PC that’s why
why you lie

“Celt” is now a term that sceptics consider so corrupted in the archaeological and popular literature that it is worthless.

THERE IS DNA.

A typical looking Celt, many had dark hair, eyes varied as they do today.

Longer face, thinner, large eyes and certain ferocity. The nose isn’t quite right nor the mouth because this woman isn’t a Celt, but it’s a similar look. Likewise-

It’s really the pale skin that makes the Aryan. This makes woad brighter.

Note the chin.

Profile.

Not Celtic, but statues with eyes are creepy.

Celtic mummy found in China

They weren’t all lookers.

Celtic, not Roman.

This is quite realistic.

Eyes too small

I would comment on the other races mentioned but I’m sure others know more than me.

The Asian Questions

Off the top of my head, as promised,

  • Have you looked at the torture techniques these people practiced up until very, very recently?

feel free to write on these independently or come up with your own.
I’d be curious about a similar list for Whites. I’m fine with criticism.

  • Is nobody going to mention the fetishes?
  • They move to white universities and white-majority territories, why are they always unhappy with their own kind?
  • How many have ruined ancient Western monuments with scratchings and name carvings like a chav?
  • Without instruction, from baby age up, where would they be? Where’s the initiative? The culture must suppress and control them but how deep does this infantilisation go? Plenty of middle-aged men are under their elderly mother’s thumb, since they’re Matriarchal cultures?
  • Serious attitude angle worked in the media to boost the appearance of intelligence, rampant cheating when they measure themselves versus other races do, plenty of credentialism, really studious but never beyond curriculum (will this be on the exam?) Where is the Asian genius?
  • Care for attaining rank not performing role, tend to outsource and ethics are dodgy (type a country and ‘product scandal’, see what comes up, or ‘Country is selling’). China sells human flesh. They do. You can also buy dolphin and tigers.
  • Western manufacturing standards are laughed at. Why does everything break?
  • They don’t produce any classical art, they only copy and recite like a robot. WTF is that? If we LARPed their culture, we’d be professionally lynched. Burn The King & I.
  • Selecting for obedience doesn’t make for leaders, they lack the MAO genes to be useful in a war. If it weren’t for the staunch ingroup preference, they’d have been outbred or competed long before now.
  • If they’re so smart, why can’t they pool their IQ to make a better academic culture from the ground up?
  • Why do they have an aging population when they like math?
  • I don’t think white people understand just how much Chinese people hate them. They’re just good at hiding it most of the time. Fake smiles are common between LA and Japan. When will America realize the trade deals always favour the House? i.e. inferior grade metals.
  • It isn’t a class thing, it’s a race thing. They have long memories, like Muslims going on about the Crusades, but Opium wars. Why do they seem to have eerily gotten over things like Hiroshima instantly and without a shred of malice?
  • Why is social climbing still seen as the white thing to do?
  • Cool Asian Girl has replaced Cool White Girl and nobody is discussing it. The Cultural Marxists encourage this.
  • Have you noticed how they hate white people but steal our names, move into our cultures (even AFRICA) and breed with our men? Asians are the race that invented invasion, distinguish all of this from that.
  • Christianity has failed there but Islam is thriving, why is this?
  • There’s no distinction between men and women that they don’t force e.g. dress. Why is their sexual dimorphism so low? At least Africans look like adults, and it’s strange that mixed black/white children are criticized as ugly when far worse in the looks stakes are Asian combinations, who look alien-like. Nobody is ever allowed to talk about this. A black/white girl is going to be far, far prettier than an Asian/white hybrid mix. They appear to have worse health but it’s hardly studied e.g. the tendency to obesity seems greatest in this group of all groups.
  • It’s a fine line between love and hatred… about as thin as an alimony check.The Chinese judge their own as inferior to mixed half-whites. Is this purely based on appearance?
  • Why are they cut slack? When they do something wrong, people write it off. It must have been a mistake.. No?
  • When the West(ern Industrialization) from the British Revolution falls, they’ll eat each other. What happens when America stops providing its farming exports, including technology to keep the soil fertile?
  • They eat dogs and calls rice cuisine…. they are the most r-selected by population, over HALF the world and invading Africa. Why does Chinese food have such a great reputation when it’s on the level of a kebab?
  • Well, SE English average IQ is around 102. Highest SE Asian score average is 105. That’s WITH cheating in most cases and extra tuition, they’re maxxed out – plus the social science margin of error is 5% ….
    or 5 points. When the white man tries again, how much farther can we soar past them and what will the reaction be?
  • The worst SJWs are asian because collectivism should be a sin. Many evils are done in its name, see Holodomor, I chose a non-Asian example. Will Asians take over SJWism until it becomes synonymous or try to play both sides?
  • Why are the absolute worst divorce rape stories…. Asian ball-buster Tiger Mom? (Abusive)
  • Anime rips off non-Asian culture because they basically don’t have a history e.g. Yu Gi Oh rips off Egyptians so much I’m shocked the SJW say nothing, there are many Arthurian stories and their character have creepily white features. How much are we supposed to take when those shows are basically extended adverts for toys that you pay for? Why isn’t there a study on anime viewership in children reducing IQ? It might not be the internet or screen technology in general.
  • Why haven’t they evolved lactose tolerance and why continue to use famine chopsticks to draw out the process of eating?
  • There’s no Chinese language, for example, there are many, why isn’t there an efficient superior one? None have special properties to explain the world. They don’t want to evolve.
  • They expect the world to cater to them, why the entitlement?
  • The cultures suppresses the emergence of personality disorders in public but Princess Syndrome and Little Emperor are known problems, looming larger than in the West, suggesting that they’re incapable of K-selection and nobody connects narcissism to Asia, why is nobody studying it?
  • What are the values and principles aside from r-selected large families? …Anyone? They seem curiously blank, like a Mah Jongg tile.

I may add to this as inspiration strikes.

If you want a prompt, these redpilling questions can usually be pre-empted by

I just think it’s funny that-

Eye colour genetics

It is completely unique, like a fingerprint but there are genetic markers that sway it broadly.

Dominance is the real theory, recession is just an absence of dominance. Recessive genes are more evolutionally novel, that’s why they’re quite easy to steamroll.

This is a simplified graph but instructive.

You could associate probabilities based on the parent’s DNA, their genotype, not phenotype outcome.