White rape gangs

Before any spoiled little shit tries to change the subject, when men are raped they can’t get pregnant or endure fatal physical damage (especially virgin females) so yes, it is completely different and shame on you for equating the biology for virtue signalling points.

It’s a false equivalence. The area the sexes hugely differ is the reproductive systems.

At the very least, women have more nerves to damage.

Women and children are permanently vulnerable so no, it isn’t all about men. Stop waving around your man card for five fucking minutes. This is about civilization. There should be an expectation of safety or why bother?

The statistics are very clear and rape shouldn’t exist for anyone, ideally. However, most rapists, regardless of target, are male and this is indisputable. That is your red suppository.

Ah, but the snowflakes who try to refocus any attention on them like a sweet 16 TV star don’t want to admit that women are vulnerable, because then men have to be responsible for their own feels. The Bible is very clear that your own lust is yours to control. Pluck out thine eyes than sin with them. Unless you can seriously claim you’re holier than God, fuck off with your victim blaming and blame the biggest claimed victim, yourself.

What do you really expect? The public space to be a sexual trigger-free safe space like some low IQ shithole? Why not live there? Ah, but it’s about happiness isn’t it? Other people’s natural erotic capital makes you feel insecure. If you can’t be attractive, you’ll ask every attractive person to cover up because Harrison Bergeron was the fucking documentary prequel to Idiocracy. It’s impossible and ridiculous to presume a standard for the West we never needed. Men are turned on by fantasy, how do we ban that? Is staring outlawed? The sadism of restricting normal healthy First World expressions is insane. Where is the line? Kids can’t be topless on beaches too?

Pedophiles exist. Gay men too so men gotta wear niqabs too. For a pervert atheist’s definition of “modesty”, no shoes, no cars, no toasters… people want to fuck all of those. It isn’t about the sexual object, its own feelings don’t matter. It’s all about the long suffering deviant who “can’t help it”, infantilization like that reduces their legal responsibility, somehow (fact: only if you’re retarded). And instead of inventing some etiquette when we’re in dire need of exactly that we’re going to blame the world for stimulating them with photons.

Sure, if I robbed a bank I “can’t help it” because I like money, right? Like that?
I am attracted to money, no word of a lie so I can roll around naked on it like a sexy Godfather. Money swimming because moon bathing is for hippies and witches.

Children get away with things because compared to an adult their growth is retarded. They literally don’t have as much impulse control as an adult but studies show everyone can learn! Even the thick! I bet you’re glad you have no excuse now, huh?

No?

You all argue in bad faith. It isn’t about goodness, it’s about you feeling good about yourself.

The SJWs have fat acceptance, the MGTOW have ugly appreciation. Anyone not naturally ugly must be covered in shame, because beauty isn’t divine or ordained to be enjoyed by god as part of nature! These people don’t believe in beauty (their ego cannot “tolerate” it) but they’ll gnaw your ear off with a false teleology of evolution (I read the book, it isn’t in there) where ugly psychopathic weaklings are the Ubermensch because they’re “man” enough to rape.

Bear in mind, Western culture = Western aesthetic expression.
If you aren’t free to express, culture is dead. Muslims are getting skirts banned in schools. That’s your team. That is your stated side of history. If you look in the real legal history of the West, sumptuary laws never ever worked. Lower hemlines solve nothing. And that was class appropriation. Men loved crossdressing for millennia before women! If women had to dress like men, only men would complain! We like being warm in winter! Men lose out on the opportunity to assess a future spouse’s genetic fitness based on physique. Hope you like a lemon. If every woman must cover up, every woman is tacitly informed to let themselves go, since they can’t display their value for a potential mate or social value among other women. Hence, the fat acceptance win.

Look how many women in niqabs are obese compared to hijabs. Modest, huh?

The corset was a response to Victorian obesity. Shameful fat is modern. The only permanently skinny people in the olden days were the starving poor, everyone else fluctuated because seasons exist and central heating didn’t.

Henry VIII wore the equivalent of a bandage dress on his obesity and not one of you fat-shamers say a thing about it!

People get murdered for no reason. Rape is the same, you don’t have to “do” anything, that’s a Just World fallacy. Predators randomly attack. Unless you want to bring back either castration or hanging to limit that ability, you don’t get to bitch that the victims were “asking for it” but only if female. That is sadistic and vengeful, respectively.

Society is about a realistic appraisal of how shitty humans are and shaming it. If shaming rapists makes you feel personally attacked then fine. Get a therapist.

Everybody hates these guys because they do nothing of their own volition; it’s spiteful, reactive, insecure whining when they feel someone, somewhere, might make them question their beliefs or feel bad in empathy for three seconds. That must hurt. They never start charities, host their own platforms and debates, no lobbying, God forbid! Nothing with effort. They use the rape of others as a verbal battering ram to protect their grandiose ego and it’s sickening to anyone with a conscience.

Off-topic: Making a joke about rape isn’t the same as threatening rape and the joke is still in poor taste if you phrase it poorly. Getting offended someone didn’t laugh at your joke is pathetic, finding rape horrific is not.

You want a virtue signal? I was here for years before you and caught shit from feminists for having a male rape tag and also talking about child grooming, kidnapping, rape gangs. I refused to pretend it was just little girls too and have firsthand experience with victims to know, how many of you can say that? People somewhat believed little boys were a possibility but struggle to believe to this day that adults can be taken in too. “Trafficking” is the media term, its real name is Modern Slavery. You believe any anecdote a man writes and disbelieve any female, that’s called misogyny. Even the Muslims aren’t that bad. SJWs do the opposite, believing any woman and mocking any man in pain, they are also evil cunts. It’s hypocritical evil and it’s still evil and you can’t make me say it’s not. Now the MRA assholes stream in to tell me I’m an SJW because I believe virginity is real (they don’t) and only women can get pregnant (they don’t).

I’m neither! Neither of you assholes can label me in the other camp. It’s being normal.

Some of us can see over our identity to the issues!

I’ve been targeted by everyone! They all think I’m the other guy!

It is possible to care about ALL rape victims at the same time, while acknowledging that for medical reasons, there are differences! This is the one crime where you cannot ignore anatomy! Sorry bro??!

Update: I’ll put this here, whatever.

And the #MeToo thing helped open up a national conversation here to the abuse of largely boys in boarding schools, until you morons shut it down by taking the piss (even out of male victims, brave) and now it’s all been covered up again. It might be impossible now to retread that ground, the old ones are dying off. Congratulations, you’ve personally helped defend pedophile rings. They were being exposed and you stopped it for feels. Thanks for spoiling my plan, fuckheads. It’s called the Overton Window.

Now everyone’s gone back to making insulting films about their privilege.
I’d rather not be raped far from home as a child, thanks. Boarding School Syndrome might go aways to explaining all the cucks. The parents to this day don’t want their child blamed for or suspected of seducing the adult, male teacher.
There is your toxic masculinity.

Did I mention there is no legal obligation to report child rape? Even the schools don’t need to tell the State (that will do nothing).
And the age of consent helps this along, to continue to exist? The consent that was Victorian, provisional (intended to rise with biological information we now have to make majority 18, majority was de facto 16 then for the military) and intended to prevent child rape and prostitution?

Dragging pedophiles and rapists into broad daylight shouldn’t frighten you.

Our time period in history will likely be called Pedophile’s Paradise.

They tried to take MeToo and re-shape it because it was working.
It proved they don’t own the internet. It’s the only place to change hearts. Most people don’t have minds.

Or would it make more sense if I titled this with brackets?

Idiots. There was no Plan B and they knew it. For a split second, their media hold was dead. And some of the swarthier among you had to pretend rape doesn’t happen to women…. really? Castrate yourself, you don’t deserve that dick.

The people doing the rape might be white but what about the people protecting them from justice?

Idiots can’t see logically how their actions bring about chaos. They misunderstand the situation and fuck it up for the smart ones who planned it.

Why did Hollywood suddenly go quiet on the Marxist support during that whole thing, no politics? Didn’t you notice? Hope and tacit support. They wanted to see who won before coming out. You shot us. I’m still pissed. The children suffer the most. Thanks, defend the guy with a rape button under his desk! Penis mafia! Traitor.

Spot the difference.

Stick a great big swinging dick on it. That would be honest about your priorities: Muh Dick.

They let you win – for them. You were anti-white, so you won. Who’s the SJW here?

If your workplace forces you to concede orgies are morally okay and you probably secretly wanted to be raped by your boss, anything you say about those people will be used to paint you as crazy or the real rapist here. Unless society’s standards change (denial stops) and all these people are brought to light. A spotlight.

Awkwardness is the entire point.

You might notice Denial Stops as the mantra of the red pill. Idiots.

The only way to defeat a victim culture is with real victims.

Even the white predators target whites. Those are also not okay.

You wouldn’t get over yourself so you played yourself.

UNICEF whore

http://www.anothermag.com/design-living/7604/lessons-we-can-learn-from-the-rothschild-surrealist-ball

http://www.renegadetribune.com/17-genuinely-creepy-photos-1972-rothschild-dinner-party/

Flowers

“Also, Stanley Kubrick told fellow jew Frederic Raphael, who co-authored the Eyes Wide Shut script, that “Hitler was right about almost everything” and told him to expunge any jewish influences from the script.”

“discovers an elite secret society and the type of behaviours they exhibit during their “parties.”’
http://blindgossip.com/?p=86192

Comments are interesting.

“While Eyes Wide Shut is shot in England due to Kubricks famous fear of flying, there is actually another movie that was released the same year that is also shot in one of the family castles. But this time it was a french chateau and the movie was Polanski’s The Ninth Gate and it is the same chateau as the ball took place in many years earlier. There is a rumour that Polanski attended the ball but he seemingly managed to avoid the photographer. If that is a myth or not I cannot tell. Your guess is as good as mine.”

“…it should be kept in mind that the book’s author was a Jew. Wiki claims that: Schnitzler’s works were called “Jewish filth” by Adolf Hitler and were banned by the Nazis in Austria and Germany.”

“Kubrick was warning – and then warning more loudly – his fellow Jews that their standard practices would not stand for much longer.”

Who is the modern Audrey?

Where did she buy land?

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/06/virginity-for-sale-cambodia-sex-trade
“After she’d paid her sick husband’s medical bills, given cash to her ageing parents and bought Chamnan a gold necklace to “raise her spirits”, there wasn’t much left.”
R-types. It was the daughter’s wage to spend.
“Where to begin unravelling the shadowy, painful layers of Uy and Chamnan’s story? It is not straightforward. Often overlooked by more dramatic tales of enslavement in brothels, the trade in virgins is one of the most endemic forms of sexual exploitation in Cambodia. It is a market sustained by severe poverty and ingrained gender inequality. Its clients are influential Cambodian men and other members of Asia’s elite who enjoy total impunity from a corrupt justice system. Most misunderstood of all, many of those involved in the transactions are not hardcore criminals. They are mothers, fathers, friends and neighbours.
Cambodia is far FROM the only place where women and girls are treated as commodities. But in this country of 15 million people, the demand for virgins is big business that thrives due to cultural myth and other local factors. “Many Asian men, especially those over 50, believe sex with virgins gives them magical powers to stay young and ward off illness,” says Chhiv Kek Pung, president of Cambodia’s leading human rights organisation, Licadho. “There’s a steady supply of destitute families for the trade to prey on here, and the rule of law is very weak.””
What IQ?
“But there’s another reason the trade is virtually invisible. Says Licadho’s Pung: “In terms of activism, few organisations highlight virgin buying even though it’s a devastating abuse of young women.”‘
“But they are especially dire for women, who earn an average of only 27 cents for every dollar earned by a man, according to the Asian Development Bank.”
“In fact, chbab srey also dictates that women must obey and help their parents, a rule that is almost universally followed. It would have been difficult for Chamnan to refuse.”
An abuse of filial piety.
“(Buyers insist on proof of virginity to make sure they are not being tricked.)”
?
No such thing, ask a gynecologist.
It isn’t like a ringpull on a can.
“He relates how he has been warned by “people high up” not to pursue cases of virgin buying (and also rape) because “having sex is human nature” and such issues were “not serious”.”

No difference. There is no such thing as prostitution, look at the laws closely.

Note to conservatives;

Why is family honour important?

comment
“As a man I struggle to understand having sex with prostitutes of whatever age or whatever gender. Just the idea of having sex with someone who fundamentally doesn’t want to have sex with you is totally unappealing. Obviously this is just me as millions of men seem to have no issue with and then there is the moral/health side of it.
Then you read this, keeping a young woman in a hotel room, having sex with her when she is obviously distressed by the experience.
Just on a selfish level; where is the pleasure in it?
Just don’t get it.”

Cabal logic: It isn’t rape if you bribe them to keep quiet?

The concept of coercion gets a look-in. They can make you poor.

Factually?

Misogyny and sadism. Hurting a man or some adults would have consequences.

Pimps and bros

http://www.newsweek.com/metoo-microsoft-amazon-trafficking-prostitution-sex-silicon-valley-755611

“Those emails are among hundreds fired off by employees at major tech companies hoping to hook up with trafficked Asian women. They were on their work accounts because Seattle pimps routinely asked first-time sex-buyers to prove they were not cops by sending an employee email or badge.”

Yet the SJWs do nothing.

No wonder the Tech Goliaths love immigration*…….. prostitution is always rape.

Otherwise, why need a pimp? Why need the threat of violence?

“they were asking for it” – every rapist ever

The (((libertarians))) who say otherwise own people, in their mind.
Libertarians don’t want you to be protected by the law. This should concern you.
They are rubbing their hands at the Asian birth rates.
I’d drown a girl than force her into that too. It would be a kindness.

More like Prime* Vagene Delivery.

There are more slaves today than at any other time in history.

I don’t just care when it’s white girls. I care when it’s any human being.

Q makes more sense day by day.

Condell’s fondles

He’s ever so gentle with the truth.

Better than Stefan and to the point.

They keep Molyneux’s videos up to keep people away from this guy.

No, they know. It’s class war.
They don’t view poor women as human. Or poor men, but still. This explains male feminists, who cannot openly insult the poor but they can insult ‘racists’ too poor to live in a white area and suffering the consequences. Holding brown men to the standards of white ones would make them the same class – can’t have that.

Ban public schools and you might see a change, if they don’t move to homeschooling. They see the threat, it’s a deliberate betrayal. You bring in people to hurt those you want to see hurt (not-so-silly rabbits). There is no social justice, there is only working class oppression by signalling middle-class twats. Prior to their spotlight theft, the poor had a voice – their own. They will throw every identity at an Enemy like the kitchen sink. All but the one that really matters, class. You aren’t allowed to talk about that. They might feel some of that (anti-)white guilt. Poor women are outcompeted to work as nannies for the middle class, poor men aren’t diverse enough to be taxi drivers. Oh dear. Oh course, the middle-class signalling cuntmonkeys of the Left like it this way, it’s a sign of their power. Like how male feminists date black girls to slave roleplay in bed, they feel like that brown people crowdsurfing scene in Game of Thrones.

You and I both know that in any reality, the white blonde woman would’ve been raped by SOMEONE. Call it Taharrush or something else, same practice. “It’s alright,” she says, “those people won’t hurt me.”
A new stratospheric level of conceitedness.
The maternal instinct is perverted, as you can clearly see as a crowd of brown people chants Mother, like the hybristophiliacs who think they can change rapists, cheats and killers. Exactly like that. We used to leave those people to natural selection, not deciding national policy. When do we put them on trial for placing other humans in harm’s way, aiding and abetting?

Look at working class actresses, I won’t name names. However beautiful, they fail.
If low IQ men cannot stop themselves from rape (they can), there are two solutions: deportation or the death penalty. If it were women doing it, I’d say the same. The ones calling themselves teachers shouldn’t get off lightly either.
I would mention one point almost nobody does. It is better to be a male victim of rape than a female one.
Why? Well, the little boys are more likely to be believed and so less likely to be targeted. In addition, the girls are told they don’t understand what happened to them and he was just a “boyfriend” (ban this term) or that she is actually a prostitute, which the rapist claims. Make filmed prostitution illegal by enforcement and unfilmed genuinely punished, and these girls might actually get a look-in. Age of consent was brought in to stop child prostitution, it was meant to rise at a later date. Later on, biological proof for how wrong that (if it bleeds, it breeds) idea is came in but no change. Both sexes are told to man up and shake it off. Rape is the result of conquest after an invasion. It always has been.
But baby gets what baby wants, because baby is backed by a lot of charities and people with money.
Class!

The Third World isn’t a plot of dirt, it’s the shitty quality of people that aren’t willing to make the sacrifices we did in our history for a better quality of life. Britain’s spate of hangings in the 18th Century, for so much as stealing a crumb of bread, eliminated those shitty genes for a time and made the 19th century such a lovely place… until more waves were imported with the same problem. It doesn’t sound very kind, with an historian’s eye, to import people who cannot cope behaviorally in the 21st century and the First World, to invite them only to hang them. Of course, the people inviting them with pretty signs don’t really care about them and don’t want to be taxed for them more directly (like if you buy a pet, you have a duty to care for it), which will change obviously. The prisons are full, we never had a referendum on the death penalty. It makes you think.

After Brexit, there’s nothing stopping us. After all, they believe in democracy, right? And liberal democracy, people are allowed to have one vote and settle the matter? Plenty of prog countries have direct democracy, votes all the time. Don’t they trust us to think the correct thoughts? And how many rape kits have been tampered with by “Asians” intentionally entering forensics to cover for their cousin?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/forensic-labs-data-manipulation-criminal-convictions-doubt-randox-testing-services-investigation-a8066966.html

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/nov/10/sexual-assault-rape-kit-backlog-ignored-destroyed

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4505572/At-175-000-rape-kits-sitting-storage-untested.html

https://www.historyextra.com/period/20th-century/a-brief-history-of-capital-punishment-in-britain/

In the late 13th century the act of hanging morphed into the highly ritualised practice of ‘drawing, hanging and quartering’ – the severest punishment reserved for those who had committed treason.

Britain’s ‘Bloody Code’ was the name given to the legal system between the late-17th and early-19th century which made more than 200 offences – many of them petty – punishable by death. Statutes introduced between 1688 and 1815 covered primarily property offences, such as pickpocketing, cutting down trees and shoplifting.

And the economy did great because property rights were enforced. The Empire would’ve been impossible without that regulation.

People weren’t crowding to move here back then for some odd reason.

Later, liberal MP William Ewart brought bills which abolished hanging in chains (in 1834) and ended capital punishment for cattle stealing and other minor offences (in 1837).

What a lovely person, wait until they commit a serious crime before punishing them. The ones he dubs minor don’t count, have at it!

Think: if a farmer is running on thin margins and their most valuable possession on legs is a cow, stealing one cow isn’t just a cow –  in context – it’s ruining the whole farm and making his family starve. Sure, “minor.” To a professional politician.

as did abolishing the death penalty for under-18s in 1933: no-one below this age had been executed in Britain since 1887.

Like psychopaths were never children.
Like children are never sadists?

A few years later, in the 1930s, a wealthy businesswoman named Violet van der Elst became a well-known campaigner for abolition. She argued that capital punishment was uncivilised

What about the choice they made to be in the dock? You don’t just fall on top of someone and rape them by accident.

and harmful to society

stupid bint, it’s called a deterrent

and that it was applied disproportionately to poor people.

Rich criminals can afford good lawyers. Still, getting some criminals is better than no criminals.

In fact it was his friend Christopher Craig who had shot Miles during the pair’s bungled break-in in Croydon, Surrey, while Bentley was detained by another officer. However, Craig was only 16 years old at the time of the crime and was therefore ineligible for the death penalty. 

Why, was it less murdery? That’s the age of consent for sex (wrongly) so he’s old enough to produce a life but not to be held responsible for ending one?

They’re still using this technicality, by the way.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5516435/One-six-burglary-suspects-children-18.html

Why not do it, they can’t punish you?

Labour MP Sydney Silverman’s continued attempts to pass abolitionist legislation in 1956 foundered, but the following year the Homicide Act of 1957 restricted the death penalty’s application to certain types of murder,

some animals are more equal than others

such as in the furtherance of theft or of a police officer. Up until this point, death had been the mandatory sentence for murder and could only be mitigated via reprieve – a political rather than legal decision. This change in legislation reduced hangings to three or four per year, but capital punishment still remained highly contested.

In 1965, the Murder (Abolition of the Death Penalty) Act suspended the death penalty for an initial five-year period and was made permanent in 1969.

Anyone want to contrast this with willing immigration?

Capital punishment was in 1998 abolished for treason and piracy with violence, making Britain fully abolitionist, both in practice and in law, and enabling ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights.

By Blair. You trust Blair to make treason less of a crime, right? Why would he do that, other than the Goodness. Of. His. “Heart”.

Referendum or bust.

Pat’s on BitChute, LiveLeak and PewTube.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SmQ9kAZBeWMt/

Ah, but we can’t discuss the historical or scientific implications.

After all, we’re free and equal… and those are opposites. Freedom is the ability to be unequal, if your nature requires it. Read Harrison Bergeron.

There is also the demographic side. They know the miscegenation numbers are low for white women, of all categories available, so the only way to produce those mixed babies they crave (on another woman’s behalf, because you’re liberated!) is to produce the conditions of rape. That is a level of evil I cannot comprehend.

Meanwhile, Zuckerberg thinks he can ignore a government.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-uk-parliament-data-cambridge-analytica-dcms-damian-collins-a8275501.html

Look how much he has on everyone (worse than doxxing).

https://www.indy100.com/article/facebook-google-cambridge-analytica-dylan-curran-twitter-how-to-download-your-data-8275511