Sexual predators pretty much general criminals too

Why the death penalty is a good idea, clinical side:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12616928

Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders.

Associations between trait empathy and criminal versatility were examined in a sample of 88 incarcerated adult sexual offenders (29 extrafamilial child molesters, 26 intrafamilial child molesters, and 33 rapists). Considerable criminal versatility was observed, with 60% of the whole sample and 88% of recidivist offenders having previous convictions for nonsexual offenses. Regression analyses showed significant associations between trait empathy and nonsexual offense convictions, but not between trait empathy and sexual offense convictions. More specifically, greater involvement in violent offending (e.g., assault, robbery) was associated with lower levels of empathic concern and higher levels of fantasy. Greater involvement in miscellaneous (e.g., traffic, drug, public order) offending was associated with lower levels of empathic concern. We argue that insufficient theoretical and empirical attention has historically been given to criminal versatility among sexual offenders, especially among child molesters. In particular, we suggest that developments in empathy training for sexual offenders may benefit from distinguishing needs of criminally versatile and non-versatile sexual offenders. More knowledge about trait empathy in sexual offenders, and about situational factors that may override otherwise normal empathic responsiveness, is needed.

Nice to know misogynists are related to pedophiles.

If you don’t ‘think’ a rapist is sexist, I dunno what to tell ya.

You’re probably a misogynist?

It’s odd because most pedophiles are male on male, typically, so two sides of the same coin?

So pedophiles are just misandrists who find it easier to target physically weaker boys? Is that their tactic? While misogynists go more for adult women, being weaker but easier to plausibly deny as ‘consenting’.

Previously, rapists would claim not to know the victim… until DNA.

If empathy must be trained, which it cannot be (brain development, neural pruning) maybe those “incapable” of not attacking people should be put down like dogs, that keep attacking people. You don’t “lose” your temper, you choose to attack someone. Rape isn’t an accident, you hypoagency-pushing liars. If they’re a danger to society and for some obscure, rare, brain damaged reason cannot actually control themselves, they should be locked up in asylums. 

Impulse control is a choice.

Over-ride seems to imply all men as rapists just waiting for an opportunity. BULLSHIT.

My hunger can overwhelm my urge not to steal a croissant… wait, I don’t do that, because that’s crazy. You don’t get to blame the world for your personal weakness.

Muh Dick is invalid.

r-types expose themselves

“It’s you, not me!”

spot the r-type is a fun game

slippery slope is not a fallacy, it’s pushing tolerance for evil

first it’s about letting your son be a manwhore, spreading STDs like a gay guy, causing various aborted pregnancies and without consequence, shun marriage

next thing you know he’s dressed in drag and eyeing the family dog

lefties wanna hook ’em young because if everyone’s doing it, they imagine they can avoid consequences forever

muh sexual expression has no limits, zero limits, there isn’t a level of depravity they won’t hit eventually for novelty thrills

When the Midwest receives demands from Dem voters for food, remember this.

“we explained” excuses don’t make a thing less evil

Never look at their behaviour and hold them accountable. Nope.

Don’t look at the Biblical list of crimes and wonder whether they’re there for a reason.

 

Sexual rejection should be illegal

https://old.reddit.com/r/NotHowGirlsWork/comments/8ft0je/female_sexual_freedom_was_a_mistake/

There should be a bingo chart with Spot the R-type.

That would be on it.

I might make one.

What would go in the other squares?

Something like this.

They’d even feel entitled to rape a lesbian or a celibate nun. African levels of rape. That post actually endorses the low IQ concept of “corrective rape”. To an r, all types of failure are to the shame of the world, never to them.

Who wants to point out that only men have rape fantasies?
Women only ever fantasize about men/women and situations they want, (and both parties want) therefore = not rape. What is called a rape fantasy in women is just a normal level of sexual desire, shamed. They don’t fantasize about taking an unwilling man, either. Exception: pedophiles.

Consensual roleplay is not rape?

They control everything, therefore, not hapless victim (and neither is the man in the fantasy). Neither party is hurt or disturbed by trauma. That’s quite normal desire between spouses. Potent, raw and found in the best marriages.

It’s Christian chastity. What do they think to have and to hold means? Those feelings are God-given and intended for a spouse.

Porn addict rationalization

The fact a man’s balls are so readily available during rape to twist or to crush with the fist and rupture, means that evolution gave women natural defenses against rape.

It’s just science, goys.

Postmodernism is stupid. Status signalling is for beta twats.
Yet everything modern I do is moral and natural, even the anal sex (but it’s gross to a man) and I am alpha, greatest status signal based in scientism of them all!

What naturalistic fallacy?

What is this, the naturalistic phallus?

https://old.reddit.com/r/NotHowGirlsWork/comments/8msf71/incel_gives_enlightening_biology_lesson_xpost/

According to Darwin, the antisocial rapists are prone to natural selection, not sexual. If it were sexual, that would be rejection… and damn, if that ain’t what we see.

Remember ladies, avoiding men with rape fantasies just makes you a bitch!
Displeasing any man, at any time, is proof you’re the problem!

Actually, women exist in archaeology prior to men. They didn’t bother to check?

Parthenogenesis. Men are the aberration, the mutants. Read a book?

Technically, humans are determined by woman. Women do not need men or their cells to reproduce themselves.

Ah, sweet, sweet womb envy.

All their shitty skyscrapers crumble but our bloodline is pure.

I hope artificial wombs come in because they’re so confident men would do better out of the situation where women are no longer vulnerable and therefore dependent on them. They really believe female dimorphism doesn’t reach the brain. Women are just like men but with a uterus. I guess neuroscience doesn’t exist, go home and be the best (opposite sex) you can be! Men would magically gain the mothering abilities of a female brain, which doesn’t exist. We’re all the same.

The fact you can grab a man’s beard means Mother Nature says he is meant to go down on you.

Next they’ll tell us pubes are a sign a woman is “too old”.

Pedo slavers waiting to happen. Ironically, they’ll get plenty of rape in prison, where they belong.

Rape/murder gangs: r-type revenge?

This makes more sense to me than the AC explanation (no, women don’t want to get raped).

It’s a long comment.

http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/the-denial-strategy.html#c3868577081569097767

So, what I found was that there was a rather large group of women, who weren’t very attractive, who dreamed of all the attractive and desirable women being killed; usually in rather grisly manners. And they apparently dreamed about it a lot.

That would explain the popularity of abuse, rape and murder tags in fanfiction. The writers are practically all-female.
They don’t imagine they are the Mary Sue, they imagine they are her competition.
Watching her get taken down.

This is, I think, the same thing that is happening in Europe. You have a lot of older unattractive women in charge, who are rather jealous of their younger counterparts (and trust me, no one can be more jealous than women, of other women) and they hate them and want to see them suffer. They know the muslims are rapists, they’ve always been rapists. They also know that the muslims will go for the young, attractive women. The women that they are not now and probably never were.

So this is them getting their revenge.

What better way than to ruin the white woman’s own total phenotypic diversity with dominant dysgenic outgroup genes?
And that’s why they only push for it around the poorer women, who can’t move away or marry up.

These are literal rape fantasists, but they aren’t imagining themselves.

Link: French Lefty incites rape of conservative white women

http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=34920

h/t AC, he’s right, it is white genocide as a weapon, but rape has always been a genocidal weapon. That’s why it was punished with murder and sometimes killers were not. Creating a life without permission is far worse for society than taking one.

A woman doesn’t fear murder as much as rape.

eyeroll jessica jones omg wtf shut up

They know this, so when I say this type of person should be shot, I’m being the moderate one. This is not even a laughing matter, unlike you’re laughing in shock and appalment.

p.s. yet another man pretends to know evobio and deliberately implies something about female lubrication that any woman could correct him on, if he listened. He just admitted to being bad in bed. No, a biker with tattoos, or whatever your idea of ‘rough’ is not going to get every woman in the vicinity wet, that’s ridiculous. That’s like arguing any girl in a dress can pass the boner test, whatever her looks, weight, height, the ugliness of dress…..

Who do these guys think they are?

Short post. I was doing my usual scan and I came across this;

http://www.rooshv.com/we-must-spread-counter-propaganda-to-women

omg shut up stupid dumb idiots argh ahhhh hiddleston facepalm deep blue sea

Title says it all. You don’t have to read it, it’s an example of the mindset.

In Britain, we have the common retort, a rhetorical question Who are you? when somebody without qualification and status begins to get ideas above their station. It’s supposed to act like a short, sharp verbal slap, a reminder that no, you can’t do everything, quit trying. The politer version you’ve probably heard is mind your own business. Now, I’m hardly one of those people staunchly against self-improvement, but we must recognize that the sexes are not, in fact, equal, and therefore, a man can no more lecture women on what we “should” do, than we can lecture men.

In essence, they need to back off. The backlash is happening and we don’t need them nor want them. Clean your own house of the fake MGTOWs and bitchy misogynists who want excuses and sex slaves before whining to us about your list of ‘demands’. We owe you nothing and vice versa. If we’re so bloody terrible and practically Satanic (if you read the article he makes out like we’re all lolloping Liliths ready to steal your sperm and make demonic hellspawn), you won’t mind leaving us the Hell alone, will you? Act in accordance with your beliefs. Like a man.

First issue: you require moral authority to give anybody moral advice, anywhere on anything. PUAs have negative moral authority, they are an immoral authority, from a traditional perspective. Wtf.

Second issue: you’ve never been a woman. OT: I was listening to a Clarey podcast and they started speculating about female orgasm problems. Aside from being incredibly rude and one sided (as if the majority of men who have the same don’t cause it by their porn use), I would never claim that sort of objectivity on a subject which has not and can never affect me, like Erectile Dysfunction. It just seems like they’re taking all the stereotypical, historical male issues and trying to maintain psychological distance from it (that’s called Cognitive Dissonance, kiddies) by kicking women and saying it’s our problem and blaming us and demanding we fix the (often unisex) problems while they kick back and do nothing. That’s called projection. You see, men aren’t rational beings, humans altogether are not rational beings, but men are incredibly gifted at rationalization. As we say, they could sell sand to Arabs. Doesn’t mean you need sand. Rhetorical skill is a negative in a world that values results.

Third issue: A traditional life takes decades to build. You can’t just hop off the carousel and change your mind and think you’re a suitable candidate. This is why Roosh’s ‘Poznan Institute‘ pisses me off, aside from the legal issues of aligning yourself with a European city state, when they’re against doing that without their permission (I would bet money he doesn’t have legal approval and this jibes with the general ignorance of PUAs when it comes to local law, see my post on PUA filming and London law).

Fourth issue: insulting much? Do I need to go into this point? Pretentious? Shallow? Hm? Aren’t we adults here?

superman drinking give up nope

But when women give men girl advice, they look down on us. Works both ways, bitches. Either each has a legitimate opinion on a discrete list of topics, or neither of us has.

Fifth issue: Beware of Little Hitlers. Anyone who seeks to control the lives of others is doing it because they cannot control their own. In the case of the Roosh cult, he wouldn’t DARE lecture them on male issues as if they’re personally responsible. He will never blame men. I challenge him to do a single article where he spends the entire thing blaming men for this Patriarchy dissolving, because women sure didn’t have the political power to destroy it. He spouts the same Polyanna It’s Not Your Fault BS that Oprah, Jezebel and Cosmo do. He simply switches up the pronouns.

For example, from that article where he lets loose his anti-white inner Muslim (it always comes out eventually, he wants to cover up beautiful white women with sartorial sackcloth), here’s the first line.

The structure of mating is determined by women, not men.

Then women are the powerful, dominant sex. Logically the one who sets the tone has the power. Second paragraph;

Unless men control women, they are at whim to what women want.

Oh, they want it both ways. Like the fucking feminists. Women are so weak and stupid we can control their lives. Uhuh. But they want to believe they’re secretly better. That’s got a name, it’s a bloody conspiracy theory. Matriarchy keeping you down. You was Kangs! You built the pyramids! Muh dick > your bodily autonomy, but respect the law because it’s best for everyone!

It is quite literally retarded. It isn’t even wrong. How many do you wanna bet believe they can win arguments purely on the basis of being male? Like a Man Card and oop, they win. Like the feminists who say This is why we need feminism? How many of these spergs probably call themselves rationalists, because they read a bit of LW and got a B in maths once? Cos that’s where all the atheistkult people went. What sort of dipshit appeal to authority is that anyway, like the losers who put MGTOW in their screen name – to harass women online? Sure, you don’t need women, you sure seem to need our attention though and we’re sick of it. You promised to leave us alone now actually fucking do it. Go. Walk out the door. Just turn around now, cos you’re not welcome anymore. Identity politics needs to hang in a gibbet so we can watch it rot. You go off and build your castle (from your keyboard apparently) and see how many women still avoid you despite all the trappings of outward success, not because you’re a man or the system is against you, but because they see you, as a toxic personality, and we avoid the feminists with the same too. Women are the emotionally intelligent sex. Mindfucking is our game, that’s our mode of interpersonal aggression and dispute resolution. This is pathetic meddling like the SJWs crashing the AVFM conference. You’re just like those normalfags. Traditional people don’t need you because we’re self-reliant and genuinely independent. Quit with the megalomania Savior Complex.

The manosphere is deteriorating in quality, the logic has fluttered out the window.

Feminists hate anyone who fucks men, including other men

We have the same reaction to you as the lefty atheists who claimed to be Islam experts overnight after the Paris Attacks, trying to lecture us on what it “really” is and how it “should” be (Hume spins). Your opinion is invalid. Your opinion does not count. You can have it, but nobody will listen to it.

Notice they’re suddenly trying to hop the r/K fence? No. It doesn’t work. Ks have standards. We guard our borders. It’s like they’re switching to saying Pro-Family but have abusive ideas of how a family should be led since their fathers did such a cracking job with them… (you’re not a King, you’re not always right, you listen to your commander in chief and if you make that whip noise seriously you’ll only attract dull co-dependents), it’s a power-trip fantasy. They’re White Knights. They want to save us (traditional) women and we’re the type that, by definition, don’t need help.  Go save a ho, Captain! We don’t want what you’re selling, you can’t buy in with us that easily. They don’t even want to be fathers, they find the idea of fatherhood deeply repugnant (r-types gonna r) and think it’s all the woman’s business. If real Kings can play in Palace nurseries, so can you. You take responsibility for the life you make. I figured out their deal, a while back. I didn’t want to write it up but they actually have a fetish. It’s called an impregnation fetish. That’s why they go on about female rape fantasies (which don’t exist, see post), as projection from their own, yet again. If the woman actually got pregnant they’d run like the little bitch cowards they are, the apple from their own deadbeat absentee father’s tree, while talking up a big heap of bullshit on Patriarchy and how important fathers are. Talk is cheap. Stick around for two decades making a meaningful contribution to society without deferring your agency to the opposite sex or pretending like your little brain controls big brain and maybe people will begin to respect what you say.

You wanna do God knows what on your own time, with your own money, in a way that doesn’t affect me whatsoever?

looking for a fuck to give loki thor 2

Go ahead. I don’t care. You be as degenerate and filthy as your nature compels you. That’s open-minded and that’s tolerance. It’s your soul, your karma, your own life you’re ruining. In fact, I’ll enjoy the show and laugh when it’s called in. People get the life they deserve. You wanna make the wrong choices, don’t go crying to us, Grasshopper, we’ll leave you outside to freeze come winter.

HOWEVER.

You start trying to control free people’s lives like they’re your fucking slaves and you have any rights over us? Die. It’s a human impulse and right to be free and I honestly hope there is a Hell for preachy people like that.

i hope you fucking choke love heartbreak

Going about it in the sneakiest, r-typiest way too (propaganda) just shows up what they truly are. Deceptive rats, which are an r-selected species. Mind your own business, fix your own life. Butt out of other people’s and sort yourself out.

There’s no such thing as ‘rape fantasies’

‘Rape fantasy’ is having a moment as an idea. Change the record.
wrong dr house urgh shut up idiots

They don’t exist. It’s an oxymoron. The only possible exception for mental states including self-destructive fantasy up to suicidal ideation are made for the mentally ill, but these are the same people who can chew on their intestines (please don’t ask me how I know that story). The mentally diseased have no bearing on healthy populations, like diabetics on what blood sugar should be.

Rape is legally and morally defined as non-consensual. That’s it. Rest is details.

When you choose to fantasize, that’s psychological consent. It doesn’t require another person, it doesn’t require actions. You are allowing scenarios to play out and furthermore, far being being submissive, the person is in complete control (unlike, say, rape).

It’s a frame laid and exploited by feminists as an excuse to get paid to talk about rape in academia and their supposed rape culture, as few men would find them attractive enough to ever target them (we all know rape is a sexual crime), it can become an obsession. That isn’t an obsession with rape although it seems that way to an outsider but a pre-condition of it (desirability) and functions in much the same way as men fantasizing about a starring role in a porn scenario. Other outlets might include comfort eating or comfort drinking in undesirable men.

So the next time somebody starts using this phrase as if it’s anything other than a non-sequitur, please correct them.

Idiot isn't as much a person as a process of doing things wrong

Rape – legal term, crime. Real.
Fantasies – fictive construct, common. Real. Harmless, frequently.
These things are like oil and water.

I think some men get off on the idea women have ‘rape fantasies’ as a kind of permission for their own fetishes because they have domination, pain-inducing fantasies. If they actually do want to rape a woman, that’s screwed up and they need professional help. When sex goes from something pleasurable to something intended to inflict pain, sex is instrumental and it’s a lot worse than say, torture with medical implements, it’s more personal, more psychologically scarring because it ruins intimacy for the victim (male or female).

I think the feminists laugh at male rape prison jokes from a similar motive, that the male domination fantasies (willing in porn, unwilling in rape) make it kind of okay because their own fantasies lend permission to the concept of being dominated regardless of the individuals and specific scenario involved (hence the reason all rapists say it was consensual, they don’t know what consent is or they delude themselves with this BS that ‘she really wanted it’).

It’s dangerous for both sexes as both are at risk of rape and both are at risk of mistaking consent and becoming a rapist with these myths flying around.

Nobody calls it a domination fantasy although that’s what really goes on in both sexes, it has nothing to do with rape. Rape sounds edgy to certain, terrible types of people.

It’s as ridiculous as saying that men have burglary fantasies or women want to be murdered. There are insane people, but we don’t think their delusions are real. There isn’t really an evil chicken on the ceiling. There is never a reason given for why sex and the other side, rape, is supposed to be an exception, yet there is an appeal to this exception.

I just got a comment from a real misogynist

Bet he was ugly. Very bitter about it too. I was repulsed by him in text, actually nauseated, imagine the face!

Well, it was more like an essay arguing that women are subhuman and all men should be free to rape all women at any time. It’s so extreme I considered it might be a feminist fake, but they aren’t that creative in stupidity.

He’s probably a reddit sperg. Definitely not white, and hates white people. Maybe a fake MGTOW aka VirginTOW. Certainly an omega, the lowest a human can sink. He’s like the sexual equivalent of a gold-digger, he’ll die in the collapse thankfully. There were some interesting implications to this train of thought that I’m still laughing over (misogynists can’t stand a woman being happy and laughing).

Women don’t have property rights – over our own body (the only way property rights make any logical sense, you know, it begins with your body and then you stake a claim on things beyond it).
Women can’t have jobs. Women aren’t good at any work ever. Women can’t be smart. And apparently, even female scientists aren’t “real” scientists. And even if a woman had a job, like being a Grade A doctor for example, she could refuse to treat someone medically, but not refuse rape?
Women aren’t equal humans with the right to consent (and conversely, deny that consent).
Humans aren’t social beings which require certain social norms to be observed (such as respect and no crimes like rape) for any form of human group to function without chaos.
There is no family loyalty or friendship bond which would form a protection cartel.
Beauty is a literal commodity and you must pay other humans for what is God-given/genetic, including from your father (can you guess how).
No idea just how viciously a woman can resist an attempted rape. He’d get bitten and cry home to Mommy about it. Freud was right about the disturbing connection between these lowest of the low, and their mothers, who are almost like Madonna figures.
No mention of homosexuals or bisexuals.

What gets me about these r-type losers is the entitlement.

R-types’ irrationality: Sex is all we want, we place the highest value on it of anything in the whole world. Give it to us for free with no strings or requirements or duties placed on us because our mother didn’t abort us like she should’ve done. 

Even obtaining a real object like food is layered by complex social rules and requirements. Essentially, he was condoning female slavery. Do you remember how that worked out for Jabba? Do you remember how he died? Even peasant revolts are a thing and you’re only taking their grain, you want to treat a human with unique thoughts and a right to existence equal to (probably greater) than you own, like a Fleshlight and you think they won’t brutally murder you? How retarded can one loser be?

The world doesn’t owe you anything. Ever. At all. The world owes you NOTHING.
This applies to men, women, human, animal. We are entitled to nothing. You don’t even get a gold sticker for being born. 

In a primitive environment, they’d have been bludgeoned to death by their own mother for trying it on with their own sister (or possibly, their own mother). A few years ago, I’d pity this type, I’d try to reason with it and help it. Now I’ve fully transitioned to K-selection, I can laugh heartily, mock/amygdala hijack the poor sap, and remind myself he wouldn’t last 2 minutes in a fight with a real man. Let alone dare speak to a reasonably attractive woman like me in public. You can see his rant in the link above, here’s my reply;

Foreveralone, wow, I’ve seen all your memes. And when gay men want to rape you, since they’re men and only their desires matter, that’s their right, as you said. Because you can’t deny consent to a man. 🙂

It would backfire on nancy boys like you. Don’t drop the soap.
And might I remind everyone that it still counts as rape with other objects e.g. a stick, a cactus or a wide piece of metal pipe. So the women could rape him too.

Feminist Claudia Boleyn’s 10 common misconceptions about feminism DEBUNKED

This came up when I was re-watching AVFM videos. Specifically this one about feminist shaming tactics, by a real woman.

“There’s no way they could’ve seen the video or read the post” (before disapproving of her or questioning her)
I get the feeling this is gonna be fun.

“I think it’s important to listen to what feminists have to say on feminism.” Deal. If you think it’s important to treat non-feminists as human beings capable of an equally free and justifiable opinion that happens to differ from yours.

She yaps on for ages about her personal blogs. Just plug them and get it over with.

“There are so many comments that think they’re arguing with me but they’re literally agreeing with me in different words.” ~ Claudia Boleyn

“We’re really not a hate group.” Except patriarchy. Already this is worthwhile.

1. Feminists are fat, hairy lesbians?

Stereotype. Without any studies on feminists, we cannot know either way. I would read such studies.
“Some of us are fat, some of us are hairy, some of us are lesbians.” So you’re saying it’s true. A stereotype needn’t apply to the entire group. Then she says she’s queer but not a lesbian.

2. Feminists hate men

Answer this: which sex is patriarchy? Which race? Which class?
“Feminists don’t hate men, feminists hate partriarchy.” So you are a hate group.
She speaks about it like a faceless entity. No, every group is comprised of people. Who are these people you hate?
“Upheld by men over women.” So you do actually hate men. Women cannot be patriarchy, so by hating it you can only hate men, the people behind the label.
She goes on about a “dangerous way of thinking” about traditional gender roles, those are based on women carrying the babies of the species. I will omit her little whines for clarity where they’re not funny.
“Feminists don’t hate men because they are men HOWEVER, feminists do have a hatred and a dislike for men that-” I’m gonna stop you right there. You don’t get to tell men what to do. Who died and made you Pope.
Misuse of Strawman fallacy.
She goes on to say if a man conforms to the behaviours she personally finds socially desirable, she (and feminists) won’t hate him. Oh! So the lucky few will be exempt from your hatred! How sweet of you! How gracious to spare them!
“The problem is that there are unfortunately a lot of men-” Yeah we get it. -“that don’t” We know. You want male slaves bowing to your whim. We know. “And yeah we have a lot of resentment towards them and that’s fair enough.” Would you castrate these men? Take away their symbolic and literal manhood? Serious question. Should male castration be a feminist punishment?
You say stereotype as if that makes it untrue. Stereotypes become so because they are generally true.
She keeps blaming the media. Granted, the MSM lie, but they can’t lie about everything. If a feminist does something wrong, they will reference it. It’s their role in our culture. That isn’t bad, it’s socially responsible in the public interest.

3. Feminists don’t care about men

You hate them by default because everyone in patriarchy is one and as you said a few minutes ago, you hate that. Hating is worse than not caring. “Liberation for women especially.”

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal ~ A fictional pig.

“Gender roles which are harmful to all people.” Then why do trans people have such terrible mental health? They’re the living experiment of what happens if you choose to ignore your biology. It fucks you up. Hey, who cares about studies, that show women are flocking back to the kitchen by choice? Your activism isn’t a finite resource. You are choosing to spend your time on women and exclude men, instead of making your activism equal in its support. “Although it isn’t about men and I really have to stress, it isn’t about men as a focus, it does help men too.” No evidence.
How do you define weak? A lack of testosterone or other key chemicals in the body? In which case, effeminate men are weak, there are differences in body chemistry. Is it feminine behaviour? That is a choice. Make feminine behaviours acceptable to both men and women and that would disappear. Except feminism tries to masculinize women, so you can’t do that.
The stiff upper lip applies to everyone. Crying at your work meeting about your lover chucking you isn’t acceptable behaviour for anyone. Does she have a bingo chart? Here’s a detour on gay men. “Surely having two men in a relationship makes it more manly.” Except studies prove you wrong. They aren’t in relationships, they’re man whores. Lack of ability to be monogamous isn’t effeminate. She talks about being free with emotions. I once read a great joke on tumblr;

“And be free from these horrible boxes.” What about freedom of choice? What if humans naturally gravitate toward greater wellbeing in those roles? Will you deny them? Does this include all value judgements? Freedom from success and failure altogether, the ultimate duality? Cos that’s Communism in a nutshell. “That’s a benefit to everybody” – who would’ve been a life failure and loser under any other regime.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.” ~ William John Henry Boetcker

4. Feminists think all men are rapists

– and never women. False accusations too? You missed those out, huh? I guess you just forgot. “Anybody of any gender can be a rapist, a woman can [bold mine] rape a man… anyone can be a rapist.” True in reality. Legally, only men because it requires penetration. Where’s the picketing to get that law revised? “The vast amount of rape is done by men” – reported. Reported by the usually female victim, processed in the system and taken seriously. You can’t claim a negative is true because the fact is self-report biased. If you count prison (if criminals are human), more men are raped. Truthburn!
“Feminists believe in the humanity of men.” You think men are human? Congratulations, you qualify as…. normal. Does victim blaming happen to men? Does it? You’re skewing this to be gynocentric. I know you won’t reply to this. It’d expose you as a fraud. Saying a man cannot help himself to sex is misandrist, men have free will. “We believe that men are just as intelligent and rational as women.” Science calls your bluff on that. The structure is undeniably different. Don’t think we didn’t notice the way you made it sound as if men were catching up to women, instead of the reality, vice versa. “Men should be held accountable for their actions the same as everyone else.” The same as women, you mean? Except women aren’t. Women have an easier time in the criminal justice system, laxer sentencing. Actually, most of the feminist rhetoric I have seen portrays men as default rapists (teach men not to rape) with no self-control, so they’re completely sexist, yes, I agree.

5. Feminists don’t have a sense of humour

“We just don’t particularly like jokes that make fun of (pause) oppressed groups and that bully them.” So it’s true. You seem to say a lot of things you believe in cognitive dissonance, without realizing that to an observer, you come across in a totally different, contradictory and ignorant way.
Do you make ‘jokes’ about MRAs? PUAs? Cis people? Straight people? White people? In multiple videos? That last: “They all kinda look like their souls have been sucked from them, two of the young women look dead because of poor editing… they appear sort of ethereal and grey [that’s racist] …. that’s the only reason you can have less charisma than the people in this video [bullying, not addressing their points ad hominem] … there isn’t a problem with Islam” [you’re a feminist, they’d have a problem with you] Multiple uses of “fantasy world.” You are not one to judge. “I cannot think of a single instance of racism against white people. … It’s like a weird victim complex going on.” Projection. “They don’t stand for anything really [contradicting self in X uses of racism card] I don’t actually think there’d be anything wrong with a world where there was a majority of people of colour” That’s genocide (UN), the definition includes race replacement and destruction of native culture (see: Native America). So officially, feminist Claudia Boleyn is in favour of genocide as long as it is of white people. On the video, she added a text bubble editing her own spoken, recorded words *a country in which. “It’s so poor it’s hilarious.” Classist. Need I add the term POC is offensive to white people? As if white people have no colour and aren’t people.

Explain why those aren’t bullying…? Again, who died and made you Pope? And hilariously, please do a video on your view of the European election results! Please do. For real. And another on neo-nazi hipsters. It’d be so funny. You’re like a village idiot: “I hate on people because hating on people is evil!” ~ subtext
“Satire points out how ludicrous the system is.” Yes. There are no limits on which system.
“There are a lot of feminist comedians.” And none of them are funny to normal non-feminist people (it’s a choice, not a default setting). Are you one of them? Please tell me all your stuff is a cerebral parody of social justice warrior princess.

all no none joke humour funny

6. Feminists have penis envy.

You do hate men (#2). Men are defined by humans that possess a penis and testes. If p | q.

You change the question. I noticed. Just because self-hating men called themselves feminist (see #2) doesn’t mean other non-penis feminists don’t hate men. You actually said words to that effect, the exemption. Only people without a penis can have penis envy, so changing the question to owners proves it correct. Womb envy is also a feminist theory, sure, miss it out. Sure, I guess you forgot. If womb envy occurs in Feminist Land, so must penis envy because p | q.
Rights are NOT positive claims.
#killallmen

7. Feminists want a matriarchy.

Do you want feminists in charge globally or not? If yes, that is a matriarchy and you want it.
“It would be a step up.” “We want…. there really isn’t anything wrong with that.” You want to take down a global system, which is anarchic, and you think there’s nothing wrong with it? There are no downsides to regime change or mass societal upheaval? No wars? No deaths? No rapes?

Many soldiers turned their guns against their commanding officers rather… than fight against the enemy. The retreat degenerated into chaos as soldiers looted shops and stores, raped peasant girls and murdered Jews. The collapse of the offensive dealt a fatal blow to the Provisional Government and the personal authority of its leaders. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers were killed.source

“I have to admit, it would be quite fun.”

8. Feminists are a hivemind

How else can you speak for all of them? “When they make a generalization-” Like everything you say? “However we do all share the view-” Then you are. You have the same view. Entirely. “We are sort of a collective, in that sense.” The dissonance is strong in this one.

9. Feminists are like the Nazis.

You are a fascist group. You want complete power with no one else allowed a say. You want an upheaval of all society to conform to your views. You want to police language. You want to leave no cultures alone to mind their own business (or businesses) and rip away natural laws with government totalitarian power. Fascism can be left-wing e.g. Stalin. Nazi stands for National Socialism. Socialism is left wing. The socialist tendencies of the Nazis are the ones being referenced e.g. the suppression of dissenting opinion.

“The Nazis oppressed and hurt a lot of people from this group. They killed people from my community.” Factually inaccurate. People in ‘your community’ aren’t old enough, they wouldn’t be talking about it and they wouldn’t be in your community now if they are, in fact, killed [your grammar]. You are not related to them in the slightest. The genetic line is gone, because that’s what murder is. You’ve never even seen a real Nazi and you’re daydreaming about what they’d do to you. The real Nazis wouldn’t have hated you, they had brothels for queer women. You could’ve got paid. To quote this fantastic takedown response video and this illogical gleeful post of yours on tumblr:  “They’d have passed you around like an ashtray.”
“The Nazis were quite patriarchal.” I must’ve misunderstood that sentence because it sounded as if you were saying present society, being patriarchal, is in fact Nazi. …Then why are you here?

10. Feminists are currently plotting to overthrow national governments and instead create a matriarchy (blah blah)…

She uses sarcasm to avoid answering: “That’s not a misconception, that’s totally true. Yeah you got me there.”
See #7. You want that. You admitted it seriously earlier. Question: do you want to destroy the concept of nation states? The communist belief that national divisions and loyal, patriotic unity of an indigenous peoples within a nation is damaging? Seriously, do you want multi-nationalism or nation state erasure to go with your multi-culturalism? Would you like to see us all living under the yoke of the Empire of the Glorious European Union?
“I hope I’ve given you the strength to go out and crush the patriarchy.” Is your father part of it? Grandfather? Great? Great-great?
I would say boyfriend but…. well. Or are you an asexual too, to add to your special trait list? Fish, meet bicycle.
“Loads of love.” I can feel it.