Why are so many Jews sadists?
Claire Bronfman is jewish and heiress of her late father’s Edgar Bronfman’s Seagram’s liquor fortune (6) and according to reports she is the most brutal and sadistic figure in the entire of NXIVM. (7)
Why are so many Jews sadists?
Claire Bronfman is jewish and heiress of her late father’s Edgar Bronfman’s Seagram’s liquor fortune (6) and according to reports she is the most brutal and sadistic figure in the entire of NXIVM. (7)
Men and women are trafficked everyday.
There should be warning about this in schools.
Schools practically deliver them by saying things like ‘follow every opportunity!’ and ‘don’t upset the interviewer’!
There should be hierarchy in legitimate work, yes, but not a huge difference in the balance of power.
This isn’t master/slave.
That only encourages (currently Boomer) elders to abuse their position.
Men also become targets for sexual harassment, serial bullies etc.
Your boss isn’t your parent. Nagging is unacceptable.
Human slavery would be nigh impossible without “libertarians” talking about prostitution as a right (it isn’t, that’s a fundamentally dishonest* spin on what a right is**).
What they don’t mention is that many of them have mental problems (so much for consenting adults), drug problems (force/blackmail, memory issues) and in American brothels the hookers are locked in and cannot leave.
Yes, the average household dog has more freedom. There’s no such thing as prostitution, only slavery. It is institutionalized rape of white men, children and women.
“But if they want it…”
Stockholm Syndrome, no.
The amount of gaslighting alone, combined with drugs, means no human would be capable of thinking clearly.
Remember MKUltra, humans are malleable mentally.
*in bad faith
**As a ‘service’, it involves the market and by that logic, there’s also a market for bestiality, necrophilia and pedophilia. Market doesn’t make right.
If you want to finger the true cause of American degeneracy, it’s “Israel is our greatest ally, let your daughter become a hooker” libertarianism.
Think that’s a non sequitur?
And who sells her the pharmaceuticals to do it?
You can taste the 80s average IQ.
One full SD, emphasis on the D, apparently.
Many Olive Oatmans, few of them white.
The noble savage trope is incredibly racist – and statistically false.
SJWs: You can’t pretend to care about women then act like Chief Indian is a victim.
He was saying rape gangs, you classist bigots.
I was going to put white slavery but most people probably don’t know that slavery is primarily sexual.
To this day.
Notice they never try it on with middle-class girls.
They know they wouldn’t get away with it.
“these girls say they were” the judges forced to prosecute don’t believe them, consent should be age of majority and never presumed but then the pedo politicians wouldn’t have a cover either.
And why are they given special treatment on religious grounds in prison?
What if their religion were the anti-prison platoon? It’s absurd.
The point of prison is you have no control. And don’t put them all in one block. That’s a freedom of association.
This is slavery. Call them what they are: white slavery rings.
The only way to deter these predators is bringing back hanging.
The majority wants this. It was taken off the books illegally, without a vote.
Twice they crashed the Parliamentary petition website on that issue shortly after it went up.
It’s the most pertinent solution to people who should not be allowed out.
Sympathy for the victim, not the predator.
Unless of course, the girls and women are finally allowed their right to self-defense? Battered wife syndrome for slaves? Don’t attack someone without expecting them to attack back. First World logic.
It’s like the men who stupidly slap a woman on the arse and object when she slaps them on the face. Well, you started it. If a man did it to them, they’d escalate to a punch, minimum.
We probably need a return of etiquette laws. Hell, just enforcing harassment and stalking law.
These monsters were allowed around these girls. Like leaving that goat in Jurassic Park.
Prosecute the aiders and abetters just as severely. Name, shame, face in the paper.
Of course, the surest way to trigger a Muslim slut is to call them a slut.
They think nobody would dare. Just describe them. Narcissists are easy to trigger.
Also, let the wife leave them for “adultery”.
The rape culture is imported.
It’s low IQ so fixing it is not an option. Deport or hang.
We did this with our native rapists for centuries and it’s the reason they’re so low prevalence nowadays, the DNA was largely wiped out. White nation safety didn’t just happen, it took a lot of rope.
People forget, and then we need to begin again.
We can’t enjoy it any longer because people who want to destroy us invited the snakes in.
Start with the schools.
Why are taxpayers funding any religious schools or religion taught IN schools?
No religious teachings should go through the state. This is preaching.
Ban RE. It’s an abuse of human rights.
It has no place in a school’s compulsory curriculum, it’s too complicated and there are too many religions to teach below a university level.
Freedom from religion is a freedom too.
(Even atheistkult can get behind this).
Nowadays, we’d call it trafficking/slavery.
Back then, they pretended it didn’t exist. To protect powerful men. So male privilege did exist, just rich male privilege.
I’d love to have Q or something like it open up these old cases and expose what really happened.
Vindicate Humiston, for one thing. It would draw a lot of normies’ attention.
It feels like recent history is Swiss cheese, giving people answers is a proof without being sued because all the culprits are now dead. There is no reason NOT to release this and I’ll be disappointed if there’s no review of history given present gatherings.
They always call people a crank if they’re onto something. Journalists gaslight and slander all the time. If you notice anything true, you’re just mad or hysterical or crazy or deluded. …No.
This was like a one-woman chan, it’s amazing.
This is so r-selected it’s staggering.
A guy shows up and says property should be abolished, he should be treated like a King though, and women should be forced into marriage with violent adulterers (bigamists) who wanted a ‘legal’ form of Red Army rape because something something ‘love’.
The cage the monstrous leaders’ corpses were kept in is still up in Munster, good riddance.
“Soon Jan Matthys himself arrived, a tall, gaunt man with a long black beard. Matthys, aided by Bockelson, quickly became the virtual dictator of the town. The coercive Anabaptists had at last seized a city. The Great Communist Experiment could now begin.”
“Matthys called therefore for the execution of all remaining Catholics and Lutherans, but Knipperdollinck’s cooler head prevailed, since he warned Matthys that slaughtering all other Christians than themselves might cause the rest of the world to become edgy, and they might all come and crush the New Jerusalem in its cradle.
It was therefore decided to do the next best thing, and on February 27 the Catholic and Lutherans were driven out of the city, in the midst of a horrendous snowstorm.
Ah! The Russian method.
In a deed prefiguring communist Cambodia, all non-Anabaptists, including old people, invalids, babies and pregnant women were driven into the snowstorm,
Socialists do care – about themselves.
The grasshopper should’ve been left to starve in the story.
and all were forced to leave behind all their money, property, food and clothing. The remaining Lutherans and Catholics were compulsorily rebaptized, and all refusing this ministration were put to death.”
I think we’ll have to bring this back, the cage method.
You can see they deserved it.
“With every person drafted for siege work, Jan Matthys launched his totalitarian communist social revolution.
The first step was to confiscate the property of the expelled. All their worldly goods were placed in central depots, and the poor were encouraged to take “according to their needs,” the “needs” to be interpreted by seven appointed “deacons” chosen by Matthys.”
“When a blacksmith protested at these measures imposed by Dutch foreigners, Matthys arrested the courageous smithy. Summoning the entire population of the town, Matthys personally stabbed, shot, and killed the “godless” blacksmith”
Foreigners with a sense of entitlement.
Thank god we learned our lesson.
Multiculturalism is just a slow invasion.
“A key part of the Anabaptist reign of terror in Münster was now unveiled. Unerringly, just as in the case of the Cambodian communists four-and-a-half centuries later, the new ruling elite realized that the abolition of the private ownership of money would reduce the population to total slavish dependence on the men of power. And so Matthys, Rothmann and others launched a propaganda campaign that it was unchristian to own money privately; that all money should be held in “common,” which in practice meant that all money whatsoever must be handed over to Matthys and his ruling clique.”
Banks, we call them banks.
Strangely, they are run by a religion. Must be a coincidence.
“Food was confiscated from private homes, and rationed according to the will of the government deacons. Also, to accommodate the immigrants, all private homes were effectively communized, with everyone permitted to quarter themselves anywhere; it was now illegal to close, let alone lock, doors.
No such thing as burglary.
Communal dining-halls were established, where people ate together to readings from the Old Testament.
This compulsory communism and reign of terror was carried out in the name of community and Christian “love.””
White Sharia has already happened. For similar, low IQ reasons, it also failed.
There’s a reason nobody trusts missionaries.
They’re invaders holding a book, that isn’t better.
As you can see, it’s often much worse.
“All this communization was considered the first giant steps toward total egalitarian communism, where, as Rothmann put it, “all things were to be in common, there was to be no private property and nobody was to do any more work, but simply trust in God.” The workless part, of course, somehow never arrived.”
(((Wow))) imagine my shock. And iPhones would rain from the Heavens!
“everything which offends against love – all such things are abolished amongst us by the power of love and community.”
Anyone who tries to sell you on giving them power over you for weasel words like ‘love’ and ‘community’ is a dictator waiting to happen.
Tolerance is a sin, the Bible never tells you to tolerate evil, quite the opposite.
Outlawing “working for money” is intended to increase dependence.
Like unpaid internships and universal basic income today (and the welfare cliff).
Contrary to the God helps those who help themselves logic of the Bible, which didn’t see money as evil, merely love of it and greed at the expense of rights. Making tax-collectors and bankers Satan?
“For the Anabaptists boasted of their lack of education, and claimed that it was the unlearned and the unwashed who would be the elect of the world.”
“Early in May, Bockelson caught the attention of the town by running naked through the streets in a frenzy, falling then into a silent three-day ecstasy.”
Oh, to see that amygdala. Then the other immigrant friend takes over after Jan.
The first sexual revolution / religious rape / free love fest:
“The elders were now given total authority over the life and death, the property and the spirit, of every inhabitant of Münster. A strict system of forced labour was imposed, with all artisans not drafted into the military now public employees, working for the community for no monetary reward. This meant, of course, that the guilds were now abolished.
No work > Forced labour.
The totalitarianism in Münster was now complete. Death was now the punishment for virtually every independent act, good or bad. Capital punishment was decreed for the high crimes of murder, theft, lying, avarice, and quarreling!
Notable exception: rape.
That’s how you spot the rabbit.
Also death was decreed for every conceivable kind of insubordination: the young against their parents, wives against their husbands and, of course, anyone at all against the chosen representatives of God on earth, the totalitarian government of Münster. Bernt Knipperdollinck was appointed high executioner to enforce the decrees.
Interfering with family life? Doesn’t sound like the socialist teachers we know.
The only aspect of life previously left untouched was sex, and this now came under the hammer of Bockelson’s total despotism. The only sexual relation permitted was marriage between two Anabaptists. Sex in any other form, including marriage with one of the “godless,” was a capital crime. But soon Bockelson went beyond this rather old-fashioned credo, and decided to establish compulsory polygamy in Münster.
City-wide Communist immigrant-led gang rape. And it didn’t just happen one New Year’s Eve.
Which the Red Army would also replicate in Germany, centuries later. Except you get creepy guys idolizing Russia to this day and never mentioning that literal rape of Europe.
I’m sure they rationalized polygamy (really rape and adultery) as Christian duty (as if their bodies were property of the state) despite how the Bible expressly tells us not to marry.
Since many of the expellees had left their wives and daughters behind,
Münster now had three times as many marriageable women as men, so that polygamy had become technologically feasible.
Rabbits wait until most good men are war-dead (The Sexual Revolution happened after World Wars) or poor and desperate to make ends meet then make their move to take the women. By force. How omega.
R-types are just rapists waiting for an opening, a weakness in the native Ks. First they say “don’t defend your women” then it’s “your women?” They fail as husbands and fathers (they can’t even satisfy one wife and are permissive parents). Don’t trust so-called polygamists, usually they don’t believe in an age of consent – or, when given power, consent itself…
Bockelson converted the other rather startled preachers by citing polygamy among the patriarchs of Israel, as well as by threatening dissenters with death.
Won’t let us rape your daughter? Guess we’ll have to make her an orphan.
Basic principle of tribal war. All war being tribal.
Compulsory polygamy was a bit too much for many of the Münsterites, who launched a rebellion in protest. The rebellion, however, was quickly crushed and most of the rebels put to death.
Along with their conscience.
Execution was also the fate of any further dissenters. And so by August 1534, polygamy was coercively established in Münster.
He raped the city itself, ironic.
As one might expect, young Bockelson took an instant liking to the new regime, and before long he had a harem of 15 wives, including Divara, the beautiful young widow of Jan Matthys.
Bros before what now?
Typical r loyalty.
Anyone who wants a “harem” is basically announcing to the world they’re a rapist.
If all those women wanted to sleep with them, they already would be, by consent, and they wouldn’t want a harem, that kills their ‘lovers’ for leaving.
Remember, Genghis Khan was a very successful rapist.
So-called “conquerors” are the most anti-male icons going, that was some other man’s daughter, sister, wife, mother. Sex traitors.
The rest of the male population also began to take to the new decree as ducks to water. Many of the women did not take as kindly to the new dispensation, and so the elders passed a law ordering compulsory marriage for every women under (and presumably also over) a certain age, which usually meant being a compulsory third or fourth wife.
Rape gangs writing the law.
Thank god we know better now.
Moreover, since marriage among the godless was not only invalid but also illegal, the wives of the expellees now became fair game, and were forced to “marry” good Anabaptists.
This is why you shoot deserters. If they’d betray their country and flee, what right do they have to come back to this?
Refusal to comply with the new law was punishable, of course, by death, and a number of women were actually executed as a result. Those “old” wives who resented the new wives coming into their household were also suppressed, and their quarreling was made a capital crime. Many women were executed for quarreling.
Anyone trying to shut up women is going to censor men too.
But the long arm of the state could reach only just so far and, in their first internal setback, Bockelson and his men had to relent, and permit divorce.
Polygamists are always for easy divorce and multiple re-marriage.
Actually re-marriage is the way they’re hoping to lube society up for it.
Because it isn’t a meaningful, loving commitment unless you can get out of it. And into it. And out. And shake it all about.
Indeed, the ceremony of marriage was now outlawed totally,
and divorce made very easy. As a result, Münster now fell under a regime of what amounted to compulsory free love. And so, within the space of only a few months, a rigid puritanism had been transmuted into a regime of compulsory promiscuity.”
This is what happens if you leave r-selected men in charge.
Chaos. Degenerate chaos. Learn from this lesson of history.
When the SJWs complain about male rule being violent, unfair and incompetent, they refer to r-men. The narcissism of small differences.
“Jan Bockelson seized this opportunity to carry his “egalitarian” communist revolution one step further: he had himself named king and Messiah of the Last Days.”
The Old and New Testaments were specifically written so we’d know to kill these little-dicked despots.
“It often happens with “egalitarians” that a hole, a special escape hatch from the drab uniformity of life, is created – for themselves.”
Communism for all! Except Party members – luxuries for them.
Rule by rapists.
“As soon as he proclaimed the monarchy, the prophet Dusentschur announced a new divine revelation: all who persisted in disagreeing with or disobeying King Bockelson would be put to death, and their very memory blotted out. They would be extirpated forever. Some of the main victims to be executed were women: women who were killed for denying their husbands their marital rights,
rapists, not husbands
for insulting a preacher, or for daring to practice bigamy – polygamy, of course, being solely a male privilege.”
Ah, the insecure double standards of the r-male. You can tell a polygamist is bad in bed when he won’t let his wife sleep with anyone else. But monogamy cannot exist one-way, morons, it’s a single bond between two. There’s no such thing as half loyal to your military either.
Male privilege, huh? The real thing, finally!
As we can see, some males belong on the bottom of the ladder, with no heirs, they’d destroy civilization otherwise.
We are not like bonobos, trust no one who says we were, more like a biological cross between gorilla and chimp.
“So that the king and his nobles might live in high luxury, rigorous austerity was imposed on everyone else in Münster. The subject population had already been robbed of their houses and much of their food; now all superfluous luxury among the masses was outlawed. Clothing and bedding were severely rationed, and all “surplus” turned over to King Bockelson under pain of death. Every house was searched thoroughly and 83 wagonloads of “surplus” clothing collected.
Anytime they tax actual food, you’re entering dystopia.
It is not surprising that the deluded masses of Münster began to grumble at being forced to live in abject poverty while the king and his courtiers lived in extreme luxury on the proceeds of their confiscated belongings. And so Bockelson had to beam them some propaganda to explain the new system. The explanation was this: it was all right for Bockelson to live in pomp and luxury because he was already completely dead to the world and the flesh. Since he was dead to the world, in a deep sense his luxury didn’t count. In the style of every guru who has ever lived in luxury among his credulous followers, he explained that for him material objects had no value. How such “logic” can ever fool anyone passes understanding.
Celebrities claiming they’re just like you but shouldn’t be taxed like you (nor their films).
Claiming diversity is good and making expensive efforts to avoid it.
I can see how the pseudologic would work.
More important, Bockelson assured his subjects that he and his court were only the advance guard of the new order; soon, they too would be living in the same millennial luxury.
All talk, like Elon “I’m gonna move to Mars” Musk.
Who happens to be a socialist, coincidentally.
And promises the journey to his new kingdom will be “fun” (creep code for orgies). Don’t get on the ship, folks, if you value your holes.
Logically, the greatest good for all would be letting his staff form a union…
Under their new order, the people of Münster would forge outward, armed with God’s will, and conquer the entire world, exterminating the unrighteous, after which Jesus would return and they would all live in luxury and perfection. Equal communism with great luxury for all would then be achieved.”
I’m reminded of Richard Spencer.
Magically prosperous (but anti-merit) ethnostate.
Or Mars. Space Eden. For people too smart to believe in a Savior.
The stars are a nice touch.
“Despite his continual preaching about marching forth to conquer the world, King Bockelson was not crazy enough to attempt that feat, especially since the bishop’s army was again besieging the town.”
Ah, the cowardice! Predictable as a Tottenham match.
“Finally, Bockelson, long fascinated with the theatre, ordered his starving subjects to engage in three days of dancing and athletics. Dramatic performances were held, as well as a Black Mass. Starvation, however, was now becoming all-pervasive.”
“To guard against such a threat, Bockelson stepped up his reign of terror still further. In early May, he divided the town into 12 sections, and placed a “duke” over each one with an armed force of 24 men. The dukes were foreigners like himself; as Dutch immigrants they were likely to be loyal to Bockelson.”
This is why your ancestors never trusted foreigners with promises.
Reminds me of EU “member states” and the region planning.
Why do they want a full army?
“Bockelson would undoubtedly have let the entire population starve to death rather than surrender”
Anyone who has to tell you they’re caring, isn’t.
“As for ex-King Bockelson, he was led about on a chain, and the following January, along with Knipperdollinck, was publicly tortured to death, and their bodies suspended in cages from a church tower.”
They’re still there, the cages.
If only they were women, they’d have instantly been clocked as witches. The vices gave them away as Satanic.
This is why men should distrust other men, especially socialists.
Their luxury comes from your labour.
Today it’s called the Labour party.
I can already feel the heat of hate I’m going to get for this.
There’s a broken record.
Not all (crime) are (demographic) is an excuse to dismiss data.
Probability data. It happens to the HBD crowd all the time.
A derailing tactic intended to keep you ignorant and fixated on casting aspersions (ad hom). Bullshit rhetoric. There’s no debate. It’s the statistical equivalent of anecdote and rejects the heinousness of the crime in question. In a civilized, First World society, the acceptable number is zero.
(I also think that traumatizing a person with crime should be an aggravating offence, we already implicitly have this but it’s been forgotten in sentencing for political expedience e.g. aggravating factor for taking a child’s innocence away or raping a celibate/faithful Christian or a virgin, same principle. It could even apply to male rape of a straight man, since there is another layer to the trauma based on the individual’s beliefs and identity. “Hate” crime should be put toward those ends if anything, protecting the in-group against the out-group of the really spiteful (anti-Western) predatory targeting and life ruining. The system we have is broken because it defends the out-group like infantile damsels when they are literally criminals explicitly targeting the in-group of the society they chose to live in. That is “sexual terrorism”.)
I’ll take the one with more data as example.
Muh “not all men are rapists”
– but most rapists are male, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data (including race) and publish it.
Seriously, try to find rape data by sex and/or sexuality, I did. Couldn’t find anything reliable. Isn’t this suspicious?
We need a data collection charter where such information in the public interest must be collected and published freely, with no distortions. Including the rate of demonstrably false accusations. It viscerally sickens me that a raped man by another man must expressly state he isn’t homosexual to be taken more seriously. Where are the libertarians on that privacy? Consent is never an assumption, property rights begin with the body.
You’re being hoodwinked. So I looked up American data since a lot of you are filthy Americans.
You won’t pay attention unless I’m talking about you.
Best I could find in a moderately long search attempt.
OT but “Attempted rape includes verbal threats of rape.”
How many men plead ignorance on that one?
All this insufficient data (even at collection stage) is intended to keep men and women at one another’s throats. To lower the fertility rate. It is dyscivic.
Sex-based triangulation. You cannot fight the system that oppresses you if you’re busy engaging in an impossible game of one-upmanship.
They also want to deny unPC but true stereotypes by hoping you won’t ask for full datasets.
Your taxes are paying for them already, you should get all the information.
They also are intellectually dishonest to report victim but not criminal.
Revised Oct 2018 data from 2016 (latest).
“The rate of violent victimization against males increased from 2015 to 2016, rising from 15.9 to 19.6 per 1,000 males age 12 or older.
From 2015 to 2016, the rate of aggravated assault against males age 12 or older rose from 2.7 to 4.2 per 1,000.
The rate of violent victimization against persons ages 25 to 34 rose from 21.8 per 1,000 persons to 28.4 per 1,000 from 2015 to 2016, and the rate for females in this age group rose from 24.6 to 33.4 per 1,000.”
>implies women are not persons but O.K.
Who attacked them? A ghost? It is a common incomplete sentence and poor grammar. It’s also scientism.
You need a Punnett square and I see none.
Male, female and male, female. Basic stats again? Otherwise an individual reading cannot know their risk.
“Not all men” really is the fake right equivalent of the fake left’s “not all immigrants”.
-but most terrorists are foreign, culturally and racially, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data….. again.
See the pattern?
Red-pill statistics can make men look really, really bad. Men have a right to know the likes of rape data, in particular, because they need to know they’re at great risk from other men as well.
Naturally it doesn’t list the latter but they take one step forward in two steps back by collecting male victim data…. only to neglect entirely listing the female. Mathematics in need of context. Society is not just one group, you collect all the data or it’s close to useless. They know this, it’s deliberate. This is intended to bait silly MRAs who won’t even notice it doesn’t mention perp details.
They do make another error in saying Male for Male Victim rape and subsuming the female in an age range.
Piss-poor data entry. I notice everything.
Collect ALL the data or no, we cannot debate it.
It would entirely become a futile argument of ignorance.
Conveniently, they don’t have to change and lower the crime rate (toward zero) if you don’t know how badly they’re doing their job.
5% of the latest reported US crime was rape.
That’s absurdly high for such a specific and brutal crime.
(This is what happens when you don’t keep serial offenders off the streets).
1 in 20 criminal acts was rape. You need all the data, America.
If I hadn’t screencapped this, you probably wouldn’t have believed me.
Irony! The dramatic irony!
Statistically you’re more likely to suffer domestic violence than stranger violence. That is horrifying. You were over twice as likely to get raped as burgled (1.99% in 2016). Do the libertarians care about bodily rights? Statistically they should care twice as much as about burglaries. The average citizen is twice as likely to be raped as generally assaulted, do you consider non-sexual assault a real problem?
You call yourself the First World? Greatest nation on Earth? Please, lead by example.
We’re right there with you. Bring back the standards of civil behavior, the etiquette. Update it, sure, but you do need it back again, what little data you have is starkly apparent in this. Perhaps enshrined in law, to make sure everyone is clear.
Not all- is NOT how statistics work.
Using big words doesn’t make it a debate.
You are not sounding intelligent to anyone who uses their brain.
Demand more data and think for yourselves.
Fellow Westerners are not the enemy. It is those who keep you shrouded in ignorance and wasting your time attending a digital circus of vicious fallacies. Oh but the delivery of their lies is so sweet, right?
Not all (blank) – they cant.
They don’t have to be.
It’s a false equivalence.
Rape doesn’t belong in the First World and neither do hostile foreigners.
Hopefully you can see why they won’t let me near a television camera.
You’re only watching the puppets who never raise real points. You can’t settle real issues in a soundbite or cheeky Youtube clip.
“Boys will be boys” is pathological altruism enabling the psychopathic of the male population against everyone else and sexist infantilisation.