Marrying off children is always wrong

I wouldn’t trust people who think otherwise with a goldfish for the weekend, they might try to insert things into it.
The internet has made men deviant by placing all this monstrous filth at their disposal and they can congregate and assure one another it’s normal. Born this way, right? 

People are not possessions.
One triumph of the First World is self-possession.

You’re not even a fully developed adult until the mid-twenties.
It’s biological, look it up.

I mention this because some terrible people claiming to be right-wing want slaves. The original kind, the one that is purely for the purposes of rape. Instead of acknowledging they want someone they can rape and beat and, in their mind, get away with it, they try to make it socially acceptable – by insulting the institution of marriage.

That’s why they claim to be right-wing, trying  to make pro-marriage, pro-….whatever messed-up things they can think of, only to claim, what, that women want abuse? Nobody in the history of the world has ever believed that, if you’re a shit person at least admit it to yourself.

Women went to convents to avoid marrying these types of “men”.

Both parties enter any legal contract willingly.

There shouldn’t be any underage marriage, anywhere. It’s an oversight we’ve yet to correct.
If they’re not adults they cannot consent.
Children cannot consent.

Yet you see these creepy conversations in certain places about when to ‘get’ a girl (a Middle Eastern idea they openly admit, like bride kidnapping) so she can be brainwashed and conditioned into being a domesticated slave. 1. That doesn’t work, 2. that isn’t legal, 3. you won’t like your ‘purchase’ once it grows up and has a personality and will and intelligence likely above yours.

I love how many Thai brides and the like are divorcing their green-card old fogey husbands after the required years, who genuinely thought in all their smarts that these teenagers would be attracted to them, three, four or once I saw, five times their age. They’re not going to stick around and look after you. They think you’re a creepy lech, they hate you. Who wants to care for a person like that? Does it sound sexy to you? They weren’t attractive in their prime to begin with. Don’t expect Asian women to be all-about breaking out the adult diapers for your sagging ass, they’re just better at playing you for a while, as LBFMs. That’s if they don’t murder you and take your money, as younger wives have done for millennia, especially when forced by social circumstance i.e. money.

Completely one-sided and never foisting this on underage boys (like they can afford to slag off Ancient Greece) from a remnant sense of shame and disgrace, they expect somehow there’ll be a surplus of young women, despite how Those cultures have the opposite problem, and they’ll all be magically dying to marry men old enough to be their grandfather, or great-grandfather.

It’s sick.
It’s pedophilia.
It isn’t right-wing, it’s totally r-selected, early marriage is literally one of the cornerstones of r-selection, degenerate to boot, legally and morally wrong in every sense (the if she bleeds thing is completely medically false naturalistic fallacy, women died a lot that way so society stopped it and menarche never used to be this early, it used to be 17-19), it’s a state-sponsored form of child rape to trap an adult while they’re too weak to defend themselves and deprive them of any self-sufficiency (basic education), putting her in a big dress and a parody of a ring ceremony doesn’t change that fact.

God can see you.

Do you want to live in that craven culture?

And none of them developed as a strategy with an aging population, men used to die around middle-age, as we’d call it now.

I’m not going to allow them to pretend that’s ever been traditional. It isn’t anywhere in the Bible to sell your kid sister like a more fuckable goat, maybe convert to Islam if raping little girls is your thing.
It’s a case of how low can you go when raping children is socially acceptable. Why not primary-age? Nursery age? Newborns? Slippery slope is very real in this case.

There are sickening conversations about How Non-White Countries Do Things.

Yeah, cos we should model ourselves on them, huh?

Have you seen their standard of living? Do those people seem happy to you?
They’re wading through rubbish and shit nine times of ten. They rely on us like dependents for food and water. Have you looked at the IQs? Is that not a dysgenic breeding habit, to be discouraged?

And they basically only mean the pretty ones… with standards… okay, how is it physically possible for the above-average to become the average?

So what if Japan has an age of consent of fourteen, you sick fuck??

A virgin would still know you’re a terrible person and be dissatisfied with your sexual performance, girls are not stupid and teenage girls are the most critical species on the planet. It isn’t Hell Hath No Fury Like A Man Scorned, is it?

The vagina isn’t even necessary for female sexual pleasure, Freud was trying to massage his own ego, basically everything a woman needs is in the structures broadly called the clitoris, the homologue of the penis. These omega male powertrip fantasies about being the big strong man of Mills and Boon dreams slaking a nubile young woman’s lust are hilarious in the era of Ann Summers and the like. [I’m not insulting male sex toys either, it’s just a fact.] Women even have a prostate, there’s a female prostate, and it has basically nothing to do with what men do.

When her hands are better than you, and she sees better men for endurance online, she’ll have plenty of opportunity to mock you, and you can’t escape. That’s the real reason the beatings happen. Weak men try to show dominance, fail as they do, and take it out on the women and animals. The pattern repeats. Nobody is happy.

And if you marry to become a patriarch, do you want your children raised in fear, knowing their mother hates you?

The West has love matches because they’re better for the whole family. It’s civic and key to our success.

Children aren’t possessions or status symbols either. Keep your mutt, those enjoy obedience and humiliation.

Would you sell your daughters off for the same treatment? Probably not.

Like a cult, the mothers help too, it’s the cycle of abuse.

That watermark is unfortunate.

Video: Trannies that trick men by non-disclosure

It meets the legal standard of rape, especially the fraudulent aspect of it. Sex is still considered biological so to pass yourself off as another thing is like a socially lesser form of breach of promise or false light. Generally it’s a really shitty thing to do. It’s fundamental to the person’s history, their current identity and the attraction, including the natural questions e.g. making babies that arise.

‘Tricking’ is too kind a word. It’s deceptive. I linked to a book here Red Queen or something I think, and many transgender/transsexual types wanted the surgery to deceive heterosexual men. They didn’t even want a bisexual man to take care of them, they wanted to poach a straight and live a fairytale princess life.

Update: this https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/book-the-man-who-would-be-queen-transgender-psychology/

Any straight woman would laugh at that, but it’s a really sad motivation when you think about it.
Especially when you consider that motherhood is integral to that picture.

It’s rape if the person believes you’re someone you are not.
Where this ties into seduction law is unclear.

Claiming ‘phobia’ is ridiculous. Someone is allowed not to fancy you.

Consent magically flies out the window if it’s a hetero man?

The classic example is if you’re married to one identical twin and consent to the other, not knowing it’s the other – still rape. Keeping someone in the dark is terrible for dating anyway, mention it on the first date as a heavy filter because living a lie whatever you are simply isn’t worth it. Why would you want to deny who you were? Isn’t that a major red flag for psychosis? It’s almost counterphobic to suppress like that.

Quite a few Asian LBFMs are actually, biologically men.

As for a whole tag called He Didn’t Know I Was Trans

It’s despicable, and makes them all look awful. Do guys really need to cheek swab you on the first date?

How can you have love without trust?

You can’t claim victim status when you’re the criminal.
The law will side against anyone who behaves like that. As it should.

You don’t get to avoid an uncomfortable conversation to get sex. Although it is a very male thing to do.

We used to hang people for this

While obviously I do mean the paedophile, I also mean the entire family. Know a tree by its fruit. The signs must’ve been there and they knew what they let into that house. Did he like anime? Did he have an Asian ‘girlfriend’ at some point? Did he start trying to change the definition and follow some naturalistic fallacy that any woman who bleeds is fair ‘game’? The signs were there. At no point do the parents blame themselves, despite this ‘man’ living at home. Under their care. What would this be called? An honour-killing of some description, wouldn’t it?
One of the few cases where abortion is not only moral, it is vital.
Followed with the sterilization of all parties involved.

Bestiality brothels shouldn’t surprise you

PETA is suspiciously silent.

http://daily.bhaskar.com/news/WOR-animal-brothels-a-lifestyle-in-denmark-shocking-cases-of-animals-being-brutally–4452570-PHO.html

“Lifestyle choice” now where have we heard that before?
R-types = animal rapists and violent abusers.
Germany = animal porn illegal, rape of animals legal.

I happen to know from a paraphilia researcher that Germany has had bestiality brothels for a long, long time. It used to be known for that in Europe, over places like Amsterdam. S&M and bestiality. That was its USP. It had laws that didn’t expressly forbid them because it was a great way to blackmail foreign diplomats. Picture Hitler crying.
Danes have something similar but who cares about Denmark? Danes with Great Danes, sick bastards.
This is what happens when sexual entitlement meets weak consent laws.
They also use heavily pregnant women to test the pedophilia laws, since they’re technically having sex involving a child.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/prostitution-pregnancy-pornography-exploitation-consent-a7697536.html

Instead of blaming prostitution (and fornication), they blame capitalism. There’s nothing more objectifying or dehumanizing for the species than hookers and sex robot slaves. Is that the best use of humans or robots?

The women-are-property meme is not only un-Biblical (violates the vows about honouring and cherishing), it’s part of the degenerate spiral to paedophilia because if women are property and cannot say NO (withhold consent, the assumption) then neither can little girls.

OT How long before vore becomes an accepted fetish among African cannibals?
The ultimate way to deal with this is to spread out pamphlets from the Koran that forbid premarital or extramarital ‘fun’.
They can’t possibly dispute with this, without insulting their own religion. It becomes No True Muslim.

Nobody chooses the niqab, ‘to submit’, the meaning of Islam’s name. Similarly, no sane woman chooses to become a hooker. It’s exploitation on par with trafficking, which is sex slavery that uses prostitution as its cover.
Nobody owns an unmarried woman’s body, the only sexual right is the conjugal and the religious canon in Christianity clearly states that the spouses own one another’s bodies. Atheists lie, thinking if they can’t control one woman, a whole flock couldn’t possibly refuse to submit…. A+ logic. Having one nagging wife is Hell, imagine a herd.

A white woman’s body isn’t a public squeezy toy and even a dog understands ‘No’, unlike these IQ85 degenerate scumbags.

Actual hatefacts to offend everyone

OR
Nevermind, your fear is completely justified.

Feel free to make your own.

So let’s talk about the Red Pill, shall we?

This little red pill where any group is magically exempt from criticism… almost like a privilege. Offense is “how dare you imply my demographic is morally fallible!”

Shall we?

 

Video: Feminists admit rape gangs, angry

Many councils broke out the shredders so their Rotherham-like state sponsored child abuse doesn’t come out.

The denial shows the real r-types, protecting the pedophiles at any cost to the outgroup.