Well obviously men can be raped

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-49057533

it’s just far less common due to the higher upper body strength of male attackers to females (easier pickings)

but like many rapists, the female (or unstudied, more common male on male) kind will incapacitate the victim if they can (proving intent) with alcohol, other drugs or physical restraints, like the male-to-female counterparts

“Another is that men view all sexual opportunities with women as positive.” more Jewish lies

“In fact, Weare says, “an erection is purely a physiological response to stimulus”.” they get it for no reason during sleep…. more porn lies that physical arousal = mental consent. Women are wet most of the time, it’s just the body keeping everything running, but porn lies.

“Men can obtain and sustain an erection even if they’re scared, angry, terrified etc,” she says. – more likely, especially in children or virgins or someone with a moral reason to object like religion, because fear is physical arousal.

Men own their own bodies, it should be assumed they do not give consent, that’s how the system works. Legally, the assumption is no. Like a bank can’t take your money assuming you consent. The military can’t deploy you assuming you consent to join. Porn has gaslighted white men into thinking their only value is sex toy for cheap women.

The only legitimization of consent that worked was the traditional society solution of marriage. But rape by fraud has always been illegal, including where the non-consent (because all consent has conditions, like the person being who they claim, certain contraception being used etc) was known by both parties at the time.

But consent doesn’t hold up outside an honour society, especially when sexual predators are also compulsive liars.

The ignorance about biology is intentional, blame the victim.

“There’s also research that shows women can respond sexually when they are raped (e.g. have an orgasm) because their body is responding physiologically. This is an issue for both male and female victims that is not discussed enough, but there is clear evidence in this area.”

forced orgasm is not pleasant, for either sex, it’s actually a form of pain, physical and mental

(((porn))) lies

this is about as surprising as the knee hammer test causing a reflex kick

for the same reasons, reflex, nerves

even electricity can stimulate men to orgasm, the pain of extreme electricity too

not that it’s common in female cases, they just are physically capable of it because stress tenses muscles

again quelle surprise

the brain cannot shut off the spine, it’s biologically impossible

A number of the participants in Weare’s 2017 study reported FTP experiences after getting extremely drunk or high, and being unable to stop what was happening.

In the first world, people should be able to get drunk without being raped.

Or what’s the first world?

One of those interviewed for the new study describes going home with a woman after a night out clubbing, and blacking out after being given what he suspects was a date rape drug. He says he was then forced to engage in non-consensual sex.

That could’ve turned into an kidney murder story too. Clubbing is really hunting grounds for some r-types. Hold the bars responsible for the drugs. Sometimes the bartender’s in on it.

Although (anti-white) misogynistic murderers/rapists (future serial killers) have a new excuse: “sex games”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/jul/25/fatal-hateful-rise-of-choking-during-sex

while no human can actually ‘consent’ to be murdered, attempted or otherwise

it reminds me of the dysmorphia people who want to be blinded or have their legs chopped off

their consent isn’t valid for self-harm

and the “I was just following orders” excuse has never flown

they say porn has no influence on behaviour but it should clearly be banned, trafficking issues aside

it’s (((their))) way of ruining families and marriages with global mental competition.

The Bible clearly states looking at another with lust is adultery. Porn is un-Christian and clearly Satanic (all the violence kinda hints).

The misogynist murderers like the kink excuse because 1. it’s something to brag about in this sick world and 2. it humiliates the innocent woman. It also implicitly tries to justify what was rape – of them while alive or as a corpse, obviously they’re admitting to necrophilia. And the charges are being REDUCED for that.

All rapists are r-types, sexually aggressive up to cruelty, just write laws that punish r-types and leave the good men and women alone.

I assumed the men being raped also exhibited the researched (and linked here) “freeze” behaviour?

in women, the post-trauma freeze response leaves more semen inside, increasing the probability of pregnancy.

Another describes being coerced into sex while working at a holiday camp one summer, while he was a student. A female co-worker had discovered a letter he had written to a boyfriend, and threatened to out him as gay unless he slept with her.

Coercion vitiates consent, still rape.

As for the fantasy line, lad culture is toxic to young men (funded by magazines pushing holidays on men) and it’s also impossible to have a fantasy (controlled) about something you do not control (an attack). What those ones actually have is a domination fantasy, inaccurately and immorally described as ‘rape’.

The choking thing is a Muslim fantasy, however. Nobody will study that.

The bloodletting extension is Jewish, like that creepy comic writer in America.

Strangulation – fatal and non-fatal – “squeezing”, “neck compression” or, as some call, it “breath-play” – is highly gendered. On average, one woman in the UK is strangled to death by her partner every two weeks, according to Women’s Aid. It is a frequent feature of non-fatal domestic assault, as well as rape and robbery where women are the victims. It is striking how seldom it is seen in crimes against men.

misogynists, as well as being would-be rapists (opportunity or not) also have fantasies of murder they eventually want to act on

it’s been known since Jack the Ripper

Numerous studies have shown that non-fatal strangulation is one of the highest markers for future homicide, which is why Australia, New Zealand, Canada and most US states have developed preventative legislation to strengthen police, prosecutorial and sentencing policies that surround it. In most US states, for example, it is now compulsory for police to charge strangulation assaults as felonies. Yet in the UK, they can fall under battery – the mildest assault possible.

so is a bruise, for comparison

since they love choking so much, bring back hanging

what’s good for the goose is good for the gander

Susan Edwards, a barrister and law professor, has spent decades fighting to make strangulation a stand-alone offence.

21st century.

“In the UK, it’s routinely minimised at every level,” she says. “It’s presented as a momentary loss of control. Attempted strangulations often leave no visible injury and fatal cases too frequently end in light sentences. You hear things such as ‘lover’s tiff’. A cardiac arrest can occur within seconds during strangulation, so there’s also the defence that strangulation wasn’t the cause of death.”

hypoagency in misogynists, imagine my shock

“women are the weaker sex, which is why you need to dominate them with violence”
“I didn’t mean to kill her your Honour! it was only attempted!”

And now, a new defence has been added to the mix – consent. Fiona Mackenzie, an actuary, set up We Can’t Consent to This following the outcry over the so-called “rough sex killing” of Natalie Connolly, 26, by her millionaire partner John Broadhurst, 40. Despite the victim having 40 separate injuries, including serious internal trauma, a fractured eye socket and bleach on her face, Broadhurst received a sentence of three years, eight months for manslaughter.

Bleach on her face trying to dispose of the body. For those not in the know.

Do not defend a psychopath MO.

“People were talking about this defence as if it was one isolated incident and I knew it wasn’t,” says Mackenzie. Although English law does not recognise consent to choking – or any physical harm – in the context of consensual sex, the Labour MP Harriet Harman has just announced her intention to have this underlined again in the forthcoming domestic violence bill. “It needs more emphasis because defence teams are increasingly offering it up, maybe because rough sex has crept into the mainstream,” says Mackenzie. “I’ve had so many women get in touch to say they have been horrified on Tinder dates by partners who have choked them during sex. If you’re dating, it’s expected of you and if you don’t go along with it, you’re boring.”

not consenting to attempted murder

PUAs are rapists, more proof – because she can’t withdraw consent if she cannot talk.

No really, that’s a given reason. I’ve seen on forums they claim it works because she can’t tell you to stop.

“But the next thing I remember is waking up gasping for breath with him on top of me. I’m not sure how long I passed out for. I booked an Uber at 6.30am to get the hell out of there. The next day, I saw the bruises on my chest. We spoke after this and all he said was that, ‘we both got a bit carried away’.”

You have to go to A&E, brain damage possible with any ‘passing out’.

Blaming her, yep, PUA. It’s incitement to attack women in many cases, including overt advice to choke a woman to display ‘alpha’.

At what point does stupid trip over into evil?

“Both those women were very young, and very drunk, killed by much older men they had met just hours before,” Mackenzie says.

Textbook sexual sadist.

There’s going to be a register, isn’t there?

But, historically, it has been “niche” and an overwhelmingly male pastime.

More diversity imported from the gays. Many killers in old studies were actually homosexual…. coincidence?

Hedonists are never ever satisfied, they’ll keep pushing the boundaries of alleged ‘kink’ until society shoots them or they die.

 eventually led to section 63 of the 2008 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act, making it illegal to possess an extreme pornographic image which included acts that threaten a person’s life. However, the cases that have come to court have been ones involving bestiality or child abuse. “It’s not used for scenes of violence, strangulation and rape, which is what was intended,” says Edwards.

A person who wants to murder you does not want sex, they want to murder you. Put the magazines and porn sites up on charges too. That porn is basically a mid-cancelled snuff film.

 The sex game gone wrong was something the police or Crown Prosecution Service came up with, not the defence. “It felt that the police thought she had somehow asked for it,” says Sarah. “The ‘sex game gone wrong’ story was a way of blaming everyone and no one.” The sleeping man was found not guilty. Nothing was ever explained.

will this be the Clinton’s excuse? Andrew’s?

Well done America

New law will force child sex abusers to pay for their own castration before being released from jail

Needs to be surgical, however, and all rapists, considering criminal versatility this would reduce overall crime.

No half-measures.

A new law will force pedophiles whose victims were under 13 to pay for their own castration before they’re released from jail. The HB 379 bill was signed by Alabama Governor Kay Ivey Wednesday after being introduced by Republican State Representative Steve Hurst. It will see child molesters undergo chemical castration, with drugs used to suppress their sexual urges. Anyone who refuses to do so will be considered in violation of their parole and kept in prison.

They want to let the pedos out, this is an excuse.

And lower age of consent to 13.

Obviously.

Explaining the reasoning behind the controversial proposal, Hurst told CBS42: ‘They have marked this child for life and the punishment should fit the crime. ‘I had people call me in the past when I introduced it and said don’t you think this is inhumane?

Forcing rape victims to carry to term is inhumane. The trauma of any rape victim is inhumane.

It’s discrimination based on age, this cannot be lawful.

The rapist clearly cannot be trusted to use their organ in a legal manner.

If there’s a way to do it surgically to female pedos, them too.

Everyone on the rapist’s side should be on some kinda list.

‘I asked them what’s more inhumane than when you take a little infant child, and you sexually molest that infant child when the child cannot defend themselves or get away, and they have to go through all the things they have to go through. ‘If you want to talk about inhumane – that’s inhumane.’

God didn’t say one rape was okay.

Half measures are evil.

Day before 13? Evil. Day after? Go ahead. WTF.

Rape victims in general cannot defend themselves, they tend to freeze, it’s been studied.

A total just world fallacy requiring telepathy, precognition and super strength.

Let’s leave him drunk in a bath-house and see if he can ‘get away’.

Sometimes people narrowly avoid it but they’re still traumatized and the predator is still a danger.

Hurst has also claimed that his bill could deter pedophiles from targeting children, and reduce the number of child sex offenses taking place.

Yeah make them target adult women and make rape babies.

What trauma?

A woman only deserves legal protection and sympathy prior to age 13, right?

Also, if they can control who they target, it’s fully intentional, premeditated predation and the cure is a rope.

But Alabama attorney Raymond Johnson is among those who oppose it. He thinks existing punishments are sufficient. Johnson explained: ‘They’re going to challenge it under the 8th Amendment Constitution. ‘They’re going to claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment  for someone who has served their time and for the rest of there life have to be castrated.’

These people are subhuman and cannot be rehabilitated.

God never said such people could be pure, the sentence was death.

Sexual sadists are not fully human, the neuroscience is clear.

Man ‘found with 21 severed vaginas’ in his freezer appears in court

Castrate them – before they do it to you.

Sexual predators pretty much general criminals too

Why the death penalty is a good idea, clinical side:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12616928

Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders.

Associations between trait empathy and criminal versatility were examined in a sample of 88 incarcerated adult sexual offenders (29 extrafamilial child molesters, 26 intrafamilial child molesters, and 33 rapists). Considerable criminal versatility was observed, with 60% of the whole sample and 88% of recidivist offenders having previous convictions for nonsexual offenses. Regression analyses showed significant associations between trait empathy and nonsexual offense convictions, but not between trait empathy and sexual offense convictions. More specifically, greater involvement in violent offending (e.g., assault, robbery) was associated with lower levels of empathic concern and higher levels of fantasy. Greater involvement in miscellaneous (e.g., traffic, drug, public order) offending was associated with lower levels of empathic concern. We argue that insufficient theoretical and empirical attention has historically been given to criminal versatility among sexual offenders, especially among child molesters. In particular, we suggest that developments in empathy training for sexual offenders may benefit from distinguishing needs of criminally versatile and non-versatile sexual offenders. More knowledge about trait empathy in sexual offenders, and about situational factors that may override otherwise normal empathic responsiveness, is needed.

Nice to know misogynists are related to pedophiles.

If you don’t ‘think’ a rapist is sexist, I dunno what to tell ya.

You’re probably a misogynist?

It’s odd because most pedophiles are male on male, typically, so two sides of the same coin?

So pedophiles are just misandrists who find it easier to target physically weaker boys? Is that their tactic? While misogynists go more for adult women, being weaker but easier to plausibly deny as ‘consenting’.

Previously, rapists would claim not to know the victim… until DNA.

If empathy must be trained, which it cannot be (brain development, neural pruning) maybe those “incapable” of not attacking people should be put down like dogs, that keep attacking people. You don’t “lose” your temper, you choose to attack someone. Rape isn’t an accident, you hypoagency-pushing liars. If they’re a danger to society and for some obscure, rare, brain damaged reason cannot actually control themselves, they should be locked up in asylums. 

Impulse control is a choice.

Over-ride seems to imply all men as rapists just waiting for an opportunity. BULLSHIT.

My hunger can overwhelm my urge not to steal a croissant… wait, I don’t do that, because that’s crazy. You don’t get to blame the world for your personal weakness.

Muh Dick is invalid.

r-types expose themselves

“It’s you, not me!”

spot the r-type is a fun game

slippery slope is not a fallacy, it’s pushing tolerance for evil

first it’s about letting your son be a manwhore, spreading STDs like a gay guy, causing various aborted pregnancies and without consequence, shun marriage

next thing you know he’s dressed in drag and eyeing the family dog

lefties wanna hook ’em young because if everyone’s doing it, they imagine they can avoid consequences forever

muh sexual expression has no limits, zero limits, there isn’t a level of depravity they won’t hit eventually for novelty thrills

When the Midwest receives demands from Dem voters for food, remember this.

“we explained” excuses don’t make a thing less evil

Never look at their behaviour and hold them accountable. Nope.

Don’t look at the Biblical list of crimes and wonder whether they’re there for a reason.

 

Not even on a date

http://www.agcwebpages.com/BLINDITEMS/2019/MARCH.html

Don’t Drink Near Him: Over the past few years, there have always been whispers of what this A+ list mostly movie actor was like back in high school. They were believable because he had exhibited those same behaviors for several of the years when he first started acting. He would be drinking with a woman and be charming and when she would get drunk he would take her home or to his car and he would rape her. It happened often enough here in town that he wasn’t allowed in some bars. None of the women ever pressed charges, but word quickly spread. Several of his celebrity relationships ended abruptly because of how he treated them. A few weeks ago, I ran into someone who went to high school with the actor and asked about the whispers I had always heard. She said every female in school was warned to never drink alone with him or even near him. She knew multiple friends in school who had not listened to that advice and ended up unable to fight him off because they were too drunk or passed out. Two of those teens became pregnant and one carried the baby to term. The actor knows about the baby but has never recognized it as his own except when he gleefully signed away his parental rights when a man she married chose to adopt the child as his own. The actor bragged that he never had to pay a dime of child support.George Clooney

So much for a game, alcohol is a rape drug.
The company Markle keeps, eh? What a proud feminist.
Don’t let him run for POTUS.

Remember, those women would’ve also been minors. Virgins too, no minimum age.

There’s a superhoe with a similar MO (finding them drunk in clubs) that keeps hiding behind the same-looking women. These people are sick. This type are always called “charming”.

Adding alcohol to unwitting victim’s drinks is hardly difficult but it is low.

Predators don’t care for who but HOW. Typical rules of sexuality do not apply.

Jack the Ripper

and other, cult-like activities.

Moed Kattan 17a:

“If a person is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known, dress in black clothes, cover his head in black, and do what his heart desires so that God’s name will not be desecrated.”

https://halakhah.com/pdf/moed/Moed_Katan.pdf

For R. Il’ai says, If one sees that his [evil] yezer12 is gaining sway over him, let
him go away where he is not known; let him put on sordid13 clothes, don a sordid wrap and do the
sordid deed that his heart desires rather than profane the name of Heaven openly.14

p.65

some “myth”, that quote

http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/short.html

“do what his heart desires”

kinda refutes the “cooling off period” argument

“Rather than offering carte blanche permission to sin”

errr, we can read?

“do the sordid deed”

Worse than the so-called ‘fake’ quote, is the real one!

“let him”

All prefaced by!

This is why you CHECK. YOUR. REFERENCES.

That page is full of gems

“The same usage occurs in the passage in Talmud Avodah Zarah 37a. The Talmud states that at the age of three a girl is capable of participating in a sexual act. ”

Even Yemen thinks that’s taking the piss.

Wouldn’t it be funny if the Jew/Muslim opposition was a ruse this whole time?

“Native” Americans still savages

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/17/native-american-rape-reservations-sex-assault

You can taste the 80s average IQ.

One full SD, emphasis on the D, apparently.

Many Olive Oatmans, few of them white.

The noble savage trope is incredibly racist – and statistically false.

https://www.hcn.org/articles/tribal-affairs-why-native-american-women-still-have-the-highest-rates-of-rape-and-assault

SJWs: You can’t pretend to care about women then act like Chief Indian is a victim.

Sex Bias in the US Code 1977

Snopes link a suspicious dead end.

https://www2.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf

But the Left loves women, it just wants them to have no legal recourse to the “she consented” lie of rapists (before DNA it was ‘I never touched her’). Because all women are presumed hookers and have no right to refuse, according to the likes of Ginsburg. Libel of a whole sex.

(This also applies to men and children).

If you want to track when the 50s high trust society died, this document


There is no libertarian argument for prostitution because if you can buy a person (as long as you call yourself a ‘customer’ – renting, or ‘pimp’ – owner/master), the Government already owns you and can therefore order you to do things as your pimp. Anything. The trauma, drug addiction and suicide outcomes of prostitutes prove it is to be discouraged severely on a medical level. 

This claims to be all about “opportunity” (p.102 on the doc, p.109 digital) but the purpose of the law is protection against predators.
If it doesn’t do that, it’s invalid rule.

Monsters wanting to remove the shackles of legal consequences from other monsters.

The law doesn’t give you rights, merely enforces them, we have natural rights.

To claim otherwise is to dub women or whoever else less than human. Only non-human animals can be owned (or rented), so arguments for prostitution (rich people rape) are actually anti-Darwin.

Men who think to defend this don’t realize, rape of men happens all the time. Even prisoners of war are usually forced to watch the rape of others before it’s their turn. Most rapists make absolutely no distinction between male and female, young or very old, you must assume you are next in these acts of precedent. Because you are.

Serial rapists happily rape the disabled, elderly, babies… dogs….

you think they’ll care you have a dick?

inb4 “there’s nothing wrong with it”

Plus, if you had a son, would you like your son to be a prostitute?

early p.98 is funny because it’s such a strawman

  • spending money isn’t illegal
  • spending stolen money is – because it’s stolen
  • sex isn’t illegal
  • buying/renting a human is illegal, whatever the purpose*

Don’t play dumb, scum.

According to B, as an owned human in a “prostitution” ring, they’re already kidnapped. Anything that happens to them …is already illegal.

Sex isn’t illegal. Raping a (sex*) slave is illegal.

Paying their owner isn’t less illegal.

And furthermore, it’s a market exchange – using public currency.

Totally the Government’s (and Tax Man’s) purview.