Weinstein isn’t the only one

That’s the real story, isn’t it?

How clear does it have to be when they start on lesbians?

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/jia-tolentino/how-men-like-harvey-weinstein-implicate-their-victims-in-their-acts

If you have ever experienced sexual assault or harassment, you know that one of the cruellest things about these acts is the way that they entangle, and attempt to contaminate, all of the best things about you. If you’re sweet and friendly, you’ll think that it’s your fault for accommodating the situation. If you’re tough, well, you might as well decide that it’s no big deal. If you’re a gentle person, then he knew you were weak. If you’re talented, he thought of you as an equal. If you’re ambitious, you wanted it. If you’re savvy, you knew it was coming. If you’re affectionate, you seemed like you were asking for it all along. If you make dirty jokes or have a good time at parties, then why get moralistic? If you’re smart, there’s got to be some way to rationalize this.

When you are a young woman, and you believe in your own worth and personhood and agency, it can be hard, despite the clichés that govern this situation, to understand that an older man who takes an interest in you does not necessarily share these beliefs. And, of course, young women are not the only victims of such crimes. But this is a basic and familiar pattern: a powerful man sees you, a woman who is young and who thinks she might be talented, a person who conveniently exists in a female body, and he understands that he can tie your potential to your female body, and threaten the latter, and you will never be quite as sure of the former again.

Afterward, you are rarely presented with even a single good option. Stay silent and you have acquiesced to whatever happened. Tell a friend and nothing much will be done. Come forward to an authority figure and you’ll face unfair consequences: people will be uncomfortable around you, perceiving ulterior motives; people will look for reasons that this happened to you, specifically; maybe you simply won’t be believed. There will be retribution—the power dynamic in these situations makes it a foregone conclusion. Men like Harvey Weinstein prey on women who are inexperienced enough that they can be penalized if they say no and implicated if they give in….

The real question is: one-off or systemic?

http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/246724/the-specifically-jewy-perviness-of-harvey-weinstein

Is there a prostitution problem in Hollywood? Drugs? Casting couch? Human slavery/sexual trafficking?
Vices rarely arrive alone, they travel in groups.

It’s the same with criminals.

Little-known fact: confidentiality agreements are void on matters of criminal activity. No employer is higher than the State or Crown.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/from-aggressive-overtures-to-sexual-assault-harvey-weinsteins-accusers-tell-their-stories

The playboy trope allows them good cover.

In this century it seems, the victims are using the tools of the internet to speak out.

Some employees said that they were enlisted in subterfuge to make the victims feel safe. A female executive with the company described how Weinstein assistants and others served as a “honeypot”—they would initially join a meeting, but then Weinstein would dismiss them, leaving him alone with the woman.

Sounds like a systemic abuse of power.

“That’s the most horrible part of it, and that’s why he’s been able to do this for so long to so many women: people give up, and then they feel like it’s their fault.”

Anyone who disputes that has never been in a physical altercation.
Adrenaline runs out surprisingly quickly.

She said that she told Weinstein, “I am not a whore,” and that he began laughing. He said he’d put the phrase on a T-shirt. Afterward, Argento said, “He kept contacting me.” For a few months, Weinstein seemed obsessed, offering her expensive gifts.

Lovebombing. Twisted, makes them look good and rubs it in.

“He drags your name through the mud, and he’ll come after you hard with his legal team.”

“He started massaging my shoulders, which made me very uncomfortable, and then tried to get more physical, sort of chasing me around,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biastophilia

Weinstein said, “Oh, the girls always say no. You know, ‘No, no.’ And then they have a beer or two and then they’re throwing themselves at me.” In a tone that Nestor described as “very weirdly proud,” Weinstein added “that he’d never had to do anything like Bill Cosby.” She assumed that he meant he’d never drugged a woman. “It’s just a bizarre thing to be so proud of,” she said. “That you’ve never had to resort to doing that. It was just so far removed from reality and normal rules of consent.”

I could feel that the more I was freaking out, the more he was excited.” She added, “It was like a hunter with a wild animal. The fear turns him on.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_sadism_disorder

No, urges are not an excuse.

Every sexual predator says that.

She said it was “a classic case” of “someone not understanding the word ‘no’. . . I must have said no a thousand times.”

Ask any expert, “No” makes rapists harder.

De Caunes told Weinstein that she was leaving, and he panicked. “We haven’t done anything!” she remembered him saying. “It’s like being in a Walt Disney movie!”

One male former staffer said that many of the women seemed “not aware of the nature of those meetings” and “were definitely scared.” … He said that he was never asked to facilitate these meetings for men.

They spoke about what they believed to be a culture of silence about sexual assault inside Miramax and the Weinstein Company and across the entertainment industry more broadly.

“I know that everybody—I mean everybody—in Hollywood knows that it’s happening,”

Arquette said that her silence was the result of Weinstein’s power and reputation for vindictiveness. “He’s going to be working very hard to track people down and silence people,” she explained. “To hurt people. That’s what he does.”

She said that she often thinks of something Weinstein whispered—to himself, as far as she could tell—after one of his many shouting sprees at the office. It so unnerved her that she pulled out her iPhone and tapped it into a memo, word for word: “There are things I’ve done that nobody knows.”

The problem with assuming most rape accusations are fake… is that those counter allegations are statistically fake. No smoke without fire.

Matilda Lockhart and the American savages

https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/flo02

 According to Maverick, the girl never recovered from her experience and died two or three years later.

They deserved to be conquered, there’s no such thing as a noble savage.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2016/08/23/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-native-american/

MRAs for custody of rape babies

http://bust.com/feminism/193580-man-kidnaps-rapes-and-impregnates-12-year-old-girl-and-now-is-taking-her-to-court-for-custody.html

They never talk about these cases.

In September 2008, Christopher Mirasolo, 18 years old at the time, kidnapped three 12-13 year old girls for two days in a vacant house near his families property. He now has joint legal custody of a child conceived out of that rape. 

The Detroit News has been following this story, stating that one of Mirasolo’s initial victims discovered she was pregnant the same month he was convicted of rape. Mirasolo served only six months of his one year sentence for that incident, and in 2010 was later convicted of another child rape and served only four years of the 15 year sentence. Her family was told he only served 6 months because “first-time sex offenders weren’t sent to prison because people come out worse after they go there” and he needed to care for his sick mother.

Oh no, the rapist might get raped. Think of the criminal, won’t somebody please think of the criminal?

Now, he has been awarded joint custody of the baby boy the first victim has been raising since she was 13 years old — but how? Apparently, through some shady legal nonsense, he illegally got her address and claimed she consented to adding his name to the birth certificate.

12.
Consented. 12.
This is the company you keep.

Like forging documents approved by a minor makes you look any better?

Now, because his name is on the birth certificate, he has been granted joint custody, and given the ability to be active in his child’s and his victim’s life. The victim and her attorney insist this all started after aid she recieved from the state was being investigated – ya know, a single mom can’t get health insurance AND food for her baby without some bureaucrat sticking his nose where it doesn’t belong.

Yeah, the man is always the Real Victim here, right?

Classic DARVO.

You know if a Muslim did this the internet would go batshit.
Why are Muslims held to a higher standard? Why?

Child bride advocates: We adult men have to rape children because women might choose not to fuck us! They can’t be allowed to say no, they’re not really people* with the right to reject. But we tell them and ourselves it’s good for society. Since when have rape babies ever gone on to be, like, serial killers or something? Don’t oppress me with genetics.

*bestiality is the argument in favour? The best argument in favour. If you’re in favour of infantilising all children, good, but then you shouldn’t want to fuck them.

Why is a white man allowed to get away with any of this?
Do you still believe bleeding is the stable, reliable indicator of breeding ability, rather than a bizarre outcome of xenoestrogens in the modern world?

MRAs are responsible for this child abusing shit.
No, random men do not have any rights over random women. Sexual or otherwise.
They never did at any point in history, that’s an internet myth. You are stupid for believing in it.
There is fuck-all proof because it’s made up as the tooth fairy.

Keep your white Sharia and move to Saudi Arabia where you belong.
If you want someone to abuse, get a dog. Wait, they love their dog more than any wife. I think I see the problem. It’s them. They should be sterilized.

Asian brothels in white countries

http://www.goldcoastbulletin.com.au/lifestyle/the-crackdown-on-rub-and-tug-parlours-and-how-its-affecting-workers/news-story/f447a9659f203785e1047d3ad3327e83

Little Thailands, like the Muslims, they replicate the exact ‘culture’ they run from and it’s allowed? I don’t see the Alt Right rampaging against these forms of immigration, and not all of them are willing (well, none of them are willing without cash, so technically they’re not consenting to sex, and they work there under threat with a pimp). At least some are slaves. So much for whites being morally better in their own land.

http://www.goldcoastbulletin.com.au/lifestyle/sex-workers-speak-out-about-the-crackdown-on-illegal-or-noncompliant-brothels/news-story/19d5f564d8768a11de539f98d54c6c1b

Clearly, white men always have moral authority by the magic powers of whiteness?

I guess we should all turn a blind eye to it.

And obviously, Asian women make such superior wives, they never do the dirty things white women do, for example.

Nobody wants to point out slavery is the original immigration.

 

Another one

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/oct/03/roman-polanski-under-investigation-by-swiss-police-over-new-allegations

If the so-called men of the internet could stop calling every rape allegation fake, that’d be wonderful.

As if there aren’t male victims either. (Not this case.)

Most rape doesn’t even occur in America. It sounds like you’re just defending all male rapists that way. Really bad move, whatever point you might’ve had about anonymity dies.

Overt abortion pill use on rise

More people than ever are accessing abortion pills in the UK

Even though it’s legal, they don’t want it tracked. AKA limited, regulated by their blessed State.
The Pill itself is already abortifacient.

https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/12/the-pill-contraceptive-or-abortifacient/266725/
If that is its biological mechanism (it is) then it’s a form of abortion.

“Studies have not established that emergency contraceptive pills prevent fertilized eggs from implanting in the womb, leading scientists say.”

Naturally, they’re now lying about this and trying to cover up the way it literally works (what informed consent?) to push it legally, including on minors or those women still developing (into mid-20s).
Medically, the rule is if you’re not sure, don’t do it.

“Further inconsistency among pro-lifers is seen in the fact that greater opposition exists among abortion opponents for the morning after pill than for the regular birth control pill, which in most cases is the same medication taken hours later and in varying dosage, but working in the same way

Yes, the same way.
The Pill is a choice to sleep around and have others pay for your pleasure (but not alcohol or other drugs, oddly). Plan B is intended for rape victims. Not really a choice, and not about personal jollies.
That’s why the difference.

“In the case or rape, the intent of Plan B is not to stop life, but to stop the act of the rapist from reaching its ordered end: impregnation, which would be a form of success of the violent assault. Therefore, a Catholic health plan may include emergency use of Plan B in case of rape, provided it is accompanied by a pregnancy test.”

to prove they weren’t already pregnant and lying about the rape

exactly, if it were just pleasure the rapist wouldn’t be doing that kind of reproductive sex
pregnancy is the aim of heterosexual rape, always has been
that’s how r-types reproduce with K-types, otherwise it wouldn’t happen

Reproductive abuse

is the non-PC term.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/juliegerstein/ian-somerhalder-says-he-threw-out-nikki-reeds-birth-control

I guess it might apply to men but that definition has yet to be written since men don’t carry.

https://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Health-Care-for-Underserved-Women/Reproductive-and-Sexual-Coercion

Interesting but incomplete.

It centres around carrying a baby. The anguish, stress, pain and humiliation.
And men complain about cuckolding. Which is an omission.

Most popular actions are

  1. throwing away birth control or tampering
  2. lying about sexual status, including STDs, but especially fertility. This includes specifics e.g. certain positions or pulling out and you won’t get pregnant.
  3. interfering with a pregnancy, like the most common being the classic pushing the woman down stairs or punching her in the stomach
  4. forcing birth control on a woman e.g. in food
  5. coercion not to use a condom or other contraception.

That last one is most common.

Stealthers are not only rapists but yes, it’s reproductive abuse too. A judge would see it that way, no consent was given to the particular acts undertake by stealth/deceit.
This is how the r-selected breed.

I’m guessing that is why Kylie Jenner is up the duff. Hefty toll.