‘Follow your heart’ is old advice

Like, hella.

0v0

Follow your heart as long as you live,
Do no more than is required . . .
Don’t waste time on daily cares
Beyond providing for your household;
When wealth has come, follow your heart,
Wealth does no good if one is glum!

http://www.humanistictexts.org/ptahhotep.htm#Follow Your Heart

It meant more in Egyptian culture, canopic jars, spirit types etc. They had about 5-6 types of soul.

Speaking of—-

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Tale_of_Two_Brothers

Why yes, JK Rowling is totally original as an author and didn’t completely rip off The Worst Witch.
Speaking of luvvies? Here’s a dramatic irony;

Benedict Cumberbatch – feminist, member of the Garrick (it’s a club that excludes women).

E-book: Baudrillard’s Selected Writings

http://www.humanities.uci.edu/mposter/books/Baudrillard,%20Jean%20-%20Selected%20Writings_ok.pdf

Don’t be so quick to write off the liberal arts.

A new humanism?

Serial conditioning

In the themes of competition and “personalization” we are better able to see the underlying system of conditioning at work. In fact, The System of Objects, the ideology of competition, which under the sign of “freedom” was previously the golden rule of production, has now been transferred entirely to the domain of consumption. Thousands of marginal differences and an often formal differentiation of a single product through conditioning have, at all levels, intensified competition and created an enormous range of precarious freedoms. The latest such freedom is the random selection of objects that will distinguish any individual from others. In fact, one would think that the ideology of competition is here dedicated to the same process, and consequently to the same end, as it is in the field of production. If we can still view consumption as an independent activity (profession liberate), allowing the expression of personal preferences, while on the contrary production appears to be quite definitively planned, this is simply because the techniques of psychological conditioning (planification) are not as developed as those of economic planning.

Two words: personal branding.

It’s stupid and anyone who engages in it is also stupid.

We still want what others do not have. We are still at the competitive and heroic stage of product selection and use, at least in Western European societies (in the East the problem is deferred) where the systematic replacement and cyclical synchronization of models has not yet been established as it has in the United States.

Psychological resistance? The force of tradition? More simply, the majority of people are still far from achieving the economic status where only one repertoire of models would be available as all commodities would comply with the same maximum standard; where diversity would matter less than possessing the “latest” model – the imperative fetish of social valorization. In the United States 90 per cent of the population experience no other desire than to possess what others possess.

*cough iPhone 7 cough*

Free: The SJW attack survival guide

http://www.voxday.net/mart/SJW_Attack_Survival_Guide.pdf

Free to download, a cropped version of C7 from SJWs Always Lie by Vox Day.

well done damn bloody well good job IT Crowd

Freely share and distribute with those who might fall afoul of the Thought Police (basically everyone).

dis gonna be good anticipation pull up a chair listen watch

Book: The Man Who Would Be Queen (transgender psychology)

http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/JMichael-Bailey/TMWWBQ.pdf

Link thanks to SuperMisdreavus. Whole book.

Autogynephilic and Homosexual Transsexuals: How To Tell Them Apart at pp.192

I don’t count the homosexual ones as you well know because they just come under a queer type of gay really, but good luck getting that back into the DSM when it’s more political than the literal Bible.

And although Blanchards ideas are fundamental to an understanding of transsexualism, they might not matter that much for helping transsexuals, which most clinicians have as their first priority. With luck, the next revision of the DSM will distinguish homosexualfrom autogynephilictranssexualism. But will popular features on the transgenderedbegin to mention the teenage masturbatory cross-dressing? Will The Cher Mondavi Storybecome a made-fortelevision movie co-starring Robot Man?Probably not, and it is a pity. True acceptance of the transgendered requires that we truly understand who they are.”

This is why natural women have an aversion to cross-dressing men. Disgust, if they’re honest.

Rather, sex reassignment has a rational choice component: Can I make it? Will I be happier as a female? Will I be more successful getting straight men as a woman than I am at getting gay men as a man?(The last decision has to be weighted by a particular transsexuals degree of preference for straight versus gay men. Most vastly prefer straight men.)

Normal men need substantial legal protections from rape by these creatures (the homosexual type usually). Open disclosure prior to offer at least. And the men who think they can fuck a man with breast implants and count as ‘straight’ need some serious social correction, it’s a damaging delusion when you consider the STD risk.

Prostitution is the single most common occupation that homosexual transsexuals in our study admitted to. About half of them have worked as prostitutes at some point….

The rate of HIV infection among transsexual streetwalkers is very high, partly due to the high rate of intravenous drug use.

The self-destruction – this is why people avoid them.
You don’t want these “straight men” passing these diseases onto the very women normal men sleep with, in general sexual marketplace circulation. It’s a public health risk.

The manosphere need to nip this in the bud and make it law for these men to out themselves.

Living on the edge is more out of necessity than desire. Most of the homosexual transsexuals I talked to had similar dreams for the future. They wanted to get their surgery (if they had not yet had it) and meet a nice, attractive, and financially stable heterosexual man who would marry and take care of them. This is obviously similar to the hopes of many non-transsexual women. When I was conducting my study of homosexual transsexuals, I routinely asked them if they knew anyone who had realized this dream. No one did.

 err what wut wtf scared rdj

oh shit omg what is this

Your move, guys.
Your move.

Reading Material: The Mating Mind

Read here: https://ontherapyaspse.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/geoffrey-miller-the-mating-mind.pdf

I highly recommend this. You won’t see dating the same way again. One of those topics everyone has a passing interest in.

Selection pressures on mate preference in humans. How do we seek novelty?

Wit, intelligence, kindness, and fitness – the sort of things most people wonder about when applying evolution to humans.

vivien leigh wait what surprise beautiful

 “If these quirks influenced the sexual choices that shaped the mind’s evolution, then the mind could be viewed as an entertainment system that appeals to the psychological preferences of other minds. Just as some books become best-sellers for their contents rather than their covers, our ancestors attracted mates by displaying interesting minds, not just shapely bodies and resonant voices. Our minds may have evolved as sexual ornaments, but ornamentation is not limited to a superficial appeal to the senses. As far as sexual selection is concerned, creativity can be ornamental. Consciousness itself may be ornamental.” Chapter 5, Ornamental Genius