Aging fathers, ugly kids

That’s one solid explanation for why people are generally uglier nowadays, even the healthy weight.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886916311035

Paternal age negatively predicts offspring physical attractiveness in two, large, nationally representative datasets

Freeze your sperm at 18 for optimum freshness.

Effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness is investigated in two datasets.

Various covariates are utilized.

Significant negative effects are found in both datasets.

Effects are independent of birth order.

Findings consistent with paternal age as a source of new mutations in offspring.

Abstract

The effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness has recently been investigated. Negative effects are predicted as paternal age is a strong proxy for the numbers of common de novo mutations found in the genomes of offspring. As an indicator of underlying genetic quality or fitness, offspring attractiveness should decrease as paternal age increases, evidencing the fitness-reducing effects of these mutations.

That’s a hard rectal red pill.

I’m sure the manosphere will try its hardest to ignore like the dead and defective babies.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Sins-Of-The-Fathers

The problem is, you think you have time.

Thus far results are mixed, with one study finding the predicted effect, and a second smaller study finding the opposite. Here the effect is investigated using two large and representative datasets (Add Health and NCDS),

holy Jesus a sound method

I almost fell off my high horse

both of which contain data on physical attractiveness and paternal age.

Validity! Validity! My queendom for some statistical validity!

The effect is present in both datasets, even after controlling for maternal age at subject’s birth, age of offspring, sex, race, parental and offspring (in the case of Add Health) socio-economic characteristics, parental age at first marriage (in the case of Add Health) and birth order.

The confound control is practically orgasmic, I can’t wait to see how they mansplain this one away.

That is perfect method. But it triggers butthurts and their precious feefees are hurt by the mere implication that degenerate older dads are bad for their kid’s health. Because all those upper crust respectable 1950s dads were like “60 is the new 20 lol!” Who gives a shit if your kids need you past high school? You got more priceless clubbing times you don’t remember, that’s what really matters. Not seeing your grandkids.

Class, race, sex, age at marriage, birth order, maternal age, offspring age – there’s literally nothing else to control for. Nothing. It’s flawless.

THESE. ARE. THE. STUDIES. WE. NEED.

Logically, since women are born with most of their eggs, there wouldn’t be a maternal effect. It isn’t constantly replenishing like the male gamete. Cell division’s a bitch. Male lifestyle for all his years prior

https://www.nhs.uk/news/pregnancy-and-child/dads-smoking-before-conception-harms-kids/

affects the child at conception (and even which sperm is conceived) far more than the details of pregnancy (minus pollutants it’s pretty much the same as in ancient times, the womb is not a new environment).

Maybe add child health although those studies already exist to cross-reference with attractiveness?

As in, are the girls more womanly as adults in WHR and the boys have more manly frames (broad shoulders, narrow waist, which should be a metric of its own)? Or less gender typical? Even androgynous, or fully gender-atypical?

Do younger or older fathers produce better-looking kids in the gendered sense?

[We can tell by looking at old photos but let’s pretend.]

Give me a time machine, please. The ugly wigger types hurt my eyes.

[I have also noted mannish looking sisters tend to be the older, “ugly” sister of two -coughs Beatrice- and the girly looking brothers tend to be the younger, usually gay one. Cannot unsee.]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595000682

e.g.

“In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance). Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms. The male beard is not obviously related to phenotypic quality and may have evolved through a process of runaway intersexual selection.”

The beard can also be a sign of poor grade genes e.g. savages, wolf man. Overall bone structure uber alles.

Maybe factor in sexual activity of the father prior to conception? Especially partner count and STDs. STDs are known to harm attractiveness in the host [coughs David Beckham, most of Hollywood] so why not the offspring’s?

Back to the top study:

The apparent robustness of the effect to different operationalizations of attractiveness suggests high generalizability, however the results must be interpreted with caution, as controls for parental levels of attractiveness were indirect only in the present study.

aka please don’t sue us but you know it’s true

But you can wait forever because the Jews said so!

Say, who owns all the biotech and IVF companies?

https://www.fertilitybridge.com/blog/2018/4/11/battleforivfmarketwallstreetvsprivatepractice

[chuckles in Israel shekels]

https://hmcisrael.com/specialty/ivf-israel/

“According to statistics, around 20% of couples wishing to conceive are faced with certain obstacles that inhibit a successful pregnancy.

Fertility Treatment is one of the most prioritized fields of medicine in Israel.”

Sure, you can wait for decades! Also, cut the kid when they’re born!

We need more future little Viagra users.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.2307/2648044

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7752-female-genital-mutilation-can-cause-infertility/

Does Circumcision Decrease the Fertility of Sperm in the Male?

“However, birth rates are much higher in countries where the men are predominantly uncircumcised.”

There is no question that an uncircumcised man has a cooler penis than a circumcised man in the flaccid state. For some reason, removal of the foreskin is the reason for this. There seems to be some sort of temperature sensor in the foreskin that may control penile temperature. Removing the foreskin gets rid of this sensor.

It only takes a few temperature degrees of difference to damage sperm. As the penis is in close proximity to the testicles, it’s quite likely that a cooler penis would help keep the testicles cooler (Remember that men are more potent in the colder months of the year). Under these condition, if the testicles got too cold, they can always be retracted closer to the body.

Almost like God gave men a prepuce solely for this evolutionary function in reproduction.

…Now consider this: Circumcised and uncircumcised men have the same penis temperature on full erection, as we stated earlier in this article. So, clearly, there is a specific reason why a natural-uncircumcised penis remains at a cooler temperature during the flaccid state. When the penis is erect it is no longer in close proximity with the testicles, so penile temperature should not affect the testicular temperature at this phase (be the penis circumcised or uncircumcised).

Upon orgasm, the penis tends to retract more into the pelvis (at least with my experience). Due to the friction and increased blood flow that occurred during the sexual act, it makes sense that the penis will have an increase in temperature in a flaccid state post-sex than in a flaccid state previous to the sexual act. Could this retraction be another mechanism for the “heated” penis to steer clear of the testicles?

Go there, science.

Circumcision and Male Fertility: Is There a Link?

Scientists have recently concluded that circumcision can help with infertility in males suffering from two very specific diseases.

So… not generalizable.

Some woman perv studies after all that penis talk.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000269

Women’s faces and voices may be cues to their reproductive potential. If so, then individual differences in indices of female fecundity and residual reproductive value, such as hormonal profiles, body composition, and age, should be associated with women’s facial and vocal attractiveness to men. However, previous research on these associations is sparse, has rendered mixed results, and is limited to Western samples. The current study therefore explored relationships between correlates of reproductive capability (testosterone levels, age, and body mass index [BMI]) and facial and vocal attractiveness in women from industrial and foraging societies. Women’s facial and vocal attractiveness was associated with each of these indicators in at least one of the two samples. The patterns of these associations suggest that women’s faces and voices provide cues to both common and unique components of reproductive potential and help explain the evolution of men’s mating preferences.

Lesson: Avoid the manjaw.

Women change their vocal pitch all the time though. European women are taught to make it lower at school (speak up = louder, lower pitch), Asians try to make it higher. The key is how they sound when hysterically upset. That’s their true level. Europeans go up, Asians down.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513812000475

Attractive facial features in women are assumed to signal fertility, but whether facial attractiveness predicts reproductive success in women is still a matter of debate. We investigated the association between facial attractiveness at young adulthood and reproductive life history—number of children and pregnancies—in women of a rural community. For the analysis of reproductive success, we divided the sample into women who used contraceptives and women who did not.

So partnered, married women. Not single ones.

Introducing two-dimensional geometric morphometric methodology, we analysed which specific characteristics in facial shape drive the assessment of attractiveness and covary with lifetime reproductive success. A set of 93 (semi)landmarks was digitized as two-dimensional coordinates in postmenopausal faces. We calculated the degree of fluctuating asymmetry and regressed facial shape on facial attractiveness at youth and reproductive success. Among women who never used hormonal contraceptives, we found attractive women to have more biological offspring than less attractive women. These findings are not affected by sociodemographic variables. Postmenopausal faces corresponding to high reproductive success show more feminine features—facial characteristics previously assumed to be honest cues to fertility. Our findings support the notion that facial attractiveness at the age of mate choice predicts reproductive success and that facial attractiveness is based on facial characteristics, which seem to remain stable until postmenopausal age.

Menopause is not the face equalizer you think.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816302318

African and European perception of African female attractiveness

Dare you to do the same study with every race judging every other.

Majority of research on attractiveness is restricted to faces of European origin. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across communities due to variations in both facial morphology and local standards of beauty. We investigated the relative contribution of four facial markers of attractiveness based on 101 female facial portraits (standardized, non-manipulated) from Cameroon and Namibia, which were assessed by local male raters and by raters from a distant European population, the Czech Republic. Images from Cameroon include only women of Bantu origin, while Namibians are represented by women of both Bantu (Owambo/Herero) and Nama origin. While controlling for age and BMI, we explored the relationship between female attractiveness and a set of facial traits: fluctuating asymmetry, averageness, shape sexual dimorphism, and skin color (rated and measured in CIELab color space).

In the Cameroonian sample, local male raters favored lighter-skinned female faces with morphology closer to average. The attractiveness of Nama women as rated by Nama men positively correlated with lighter complexion, but this did not extend to rating by Cameroonian men. The attractiveness of Namibian Owambo/Herero women was positively associated with facial femininity and lighter complexion when judged by both Cameroonian and Nama male raters. In all samples, the attractiveness as rated by Czech men was predicted by age and BMI, but not by skin color. We found no significant association between attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry in any of the tested samples. When controlling for age, the effect of skin color on attractiveness turned to be non-significant in the Owambo/Herrero and Nama sample, but remained significant in the Cameroonian sample. Variations in skin color thus represent an important factor of African female attractiveness within the African context, but they do not seem to affect judgements made by European raters.

They don’t want any of them.

Sensitivity to some facial markers of female attractiveness thus seems to be restricted to regional populations and/or constrained by shared ethnicity.

Paler women have more oestrogen. So duh.

Women reject old guys who’d give them dead or ugly kids:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816301283

“This finding is consistent with men’s stated preference for young, fertile women in mating and suggests that the typical pattern is generated by women’s limiting role in mating.”

aka their gender role

“older men tend to marry older women, including those who are peri- and post-menopausal”

TIL Korea is so degenerate it has slave markets. Ooof.

So much for the myth that young women have the hots for them. Yeah, I’m sure the Jap schoolgirl came onto you, right perv?

Deadbeats are the end of the West:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816303671

Research in evolutionary psychology, and life history theory in particular, has yielded important insights into the developmental processes that underpin variation in growth, psychological functioning, and behavioral outcomes across individuals. Yet, there are methodological concerns that limit the ability to draw causal inferences about human development and psychological functioning within a life history framework. The current study used a simulation-based modeling approach to estimate the degree of genetic confounding in tests of a well-researched life history hypothesis: that father absence (X) is associated with earlier age at menarche (Y). The results demonstrate that the genetic correlation between X and Y can confound the phenotypic association between the two variables, even if the genetic correlation is small—suggesting that failure to control for the genetic correlation between X and Y could produce a spurious phenotypic correlation. We discuss the implications of these results for research on human life history, and highlight the utility of incorporating genetically sensitive tests into future life history research.

I don’t think debtor’s prisons will come back – but if you breed it, you should feed it. I think the abandoned women that existed since Biblical times will just hire bounty hunters to shoot the first family deserter for a share of his life insurance policy.

Patriarchs everywhere would rejoice at culling the cads. The women get a widow’s pension.

Everyone wins. Hey, you said “until death do us part”. Men used to die by their oaths.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381400052X

I have noticed that immigrant men have a higher pitch than their non-immigrant relatives.

Maybe the act of immigration impairs masculinity?

Low male voice pitch may communicate potential benefits for offspring in the form of heritable health and/or dominance, whereas access to resources may be indicated by correlates of socioeconomic status, such as sociolinguistic features. Here, we examine if voice pitch and social dialect influence women’s perceptions of men’s socioeconomic status and attractiveness. In Study 1, women perceived lower pitched male voices as higher in socioeconomic status than higher pitched male voices.

A lot of PUAs get shot down for 1. being brown and feeling entitled to a white woman, the lowest miscegenation group also further sickened by repeated forced “refugee” interactions and 2. having a high pitch voice and effete face compared to their national relatives. Compare within the white race, the “Latin lover” in Italy versus Italian immigrants raised and living in London, who sound like cartoon chipmunks by comparison.

Yes, we notice.

No, you can’t change it. We notice.

Same applies to white men who moved South so it appears to be immigration. Either being an immigrant or the act itself makes a man less manly. Most obviously, torso body fat deposition like a woman of their group and the sisters become like the men at home, more athletic.

In Study 2, women independently perceived lower pitched voices and higher status sociolinguistic dialects as higher in socioeconomic status and attractiveness.

It isn’t the money, it’s the genes.

Good genes, good brains, good money. Fixating on the money is what ugly guys do – Muslim prince to Jewish media mogul.

We also found a significant interaction wherein women preferred lower pitched men’s voices more often when dialects were lower in sociolinguistic status than when they were higher in sociolinguistic status.

Capacity to protect. Not a desk jockey. The middle-class is effeminate. They want army. No cowards.

Women also perceived lower pitched voices as higher in socioeconomic status more often when dialects were higher in sociolinguistic status than when lower in sociolinguistic status.

Women know quality, really? Almost like our lives depend on it.

Finally, women’s own self-rated socioeconomic status was positively related to their preferences for voices with higher status sociolinguistic dialects, but not to their preferences for voice pitch.

Plenty of men chose to marry down to get a looker out of their genetic league, hypergamy.

Erotic capital is worth it, as you can tell by the fertility study above, even post-menopausal they’re better-looking.

Hence, women’s preferences for traits associated with potentially biologically heritable benefits, such as low voice pitch, are moderated by the presence of traits associated with resource accrual, such as social dialect markers. However, women’s preferences for language markers of resource accrual may be functionally independent from preferences for potential biological indicators of heritable benefits, such as voice pitch.

Women…. making…. mate choices?

mutation load is important?

 

Stop the fake debates please

I can already feel the heat of hate I’m going to get for this.

There’s a broken record.

You’re being played.

What strawman?

Not all (crime) are (demographic) is an excuse to dismiss data.
Probability data. It happens to the HBD crowd all the time.
A derailing tactic intended to keep you ignorant and fixated on casting aspersions (ad hom). Bullshit rhetoric. There’s no debate. It’s the statistical equivalent of anecdote and rejects the heinousness of the crime in question. In a civilized, First World society, the acceptable number is zero.

They want you to forget this.

(I also think that traumatizing a person with crime should be an aggravating offence, we already implicitly have this but it’s been forgotten in sentencing for political expedience e.g. aggravating factor for taking a child’s innocence away or raping a celibate/faithful Christian or a virgin, same principle. It could even apply to male rape of a straight man, since there is another layer to the trauma based on the individual’s beliefs and identity. “Hate” crime should be put toward those ends if anything, protecting the in-group against the out-group of the really spiteful (anti-Western) predatory targeting and life ruining. The system we have is broken because it defends the out-group like infantile damsels when they are literally criminals explicitly targeting the in-group of the society they chose to live in. That is “sexual terrorism”.)

I’ll take the one with more data as example.

Muh “not all men are rapists”

– but most rapists are male, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data (including race) and publish it.

Seriously, try to find rape data by sex and/or sexuality, I did. Couldn’t find anything reliable. Isn’t this suspicious?

We need a data collection charter where such information in the public interest must be collected and published freely, with no distortions. Including the rate of demonstrably false accusations. It viscerally sickens me that a raped man by another man must expressly state he isn’t homosexual to be taken more seriously. Where are the libertarians on that privacy? Consent is never an assumption, property rights begin with the body.

You’re being hoodwinked. So I looked up American data since a lot of you are filthy Americans.

You won’t pay attention unless I’m talking about you.

Best I could find in a moderately long search attempt.

https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=317

OT but “Attempted rape includes verbal threats of rape.”
How many men plead ignorance on that one?

All this insufficient data (even at collection stage) is intended to keep men and women at one another’s throats. To lower the fertility rate. It is dyscivic.

Sex-based triangulation. You cannot fight the system that oppresses you if you’re busy engaging in an impossible game of one-upmanship.

They also want to deny unPC but true stereotypes by hoping you won’t ask for full datasets.

Your taxes are paying for them already, you should get all the information.

They also are intellectually dishonest to report victim but not criminal.
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6427
Revised Oct 2018 data from 2016 (latest).
e.g.
“The rate of violent victimization against males increased from 2015 to 2016, rising from 15.9 to 19.6 per 1,000 males age 12 or older.
From 2015 to 2016, the rate of aggravated assault against males age 12 or older rose from 2.7 to 4.2 per 1,000.
The rate of violent victimization against persons ages 25 to 34 rose from 21.8 per 1,000 persons to 28.4 per 1,000 from 2015 to 2016, and the rate for females in this age group rose from 24.6 to 33.4 per 1,000.”

>implies women are not persons but O.K.

Who attacked them? A ghost? It is a common incomplete sentence and poor grammar. It’s also scientism.

You need a Punnett square and I see none.

Male, female and male, female. Basic stats again? Otherwise an individual reading cannot know their risk.

“Not all men” really is the fake right equivalent of the fake left’s “not all immigrants”.

-but most terrorists are foreign, culturally and racially, it’s just un-PC to collect demographic data….. again.

See the pattern?

You’re chasing your tails.

Red-pill statistics can make men look really, really bad. Men have a right to know the likes of rape data, in particular, because they need to know they’re at great risk from other men as well.

Naturally it doesn’t list the latter but they take one step forward in two steps back by collecting male victim data…. only to neglect entirely listing the female. Mathematics in need of context. Society is not just one group, you collect all the data or it’s close to useless. They know this, it’s deliberate. This is intended to bait silly MRAs who won’t even notice it doesn’t mention perp details.

They do make another error in saying Male for Male Victim rape and subsuming the female in an age range.
Piss-poor data entry. I notice everything.

Collect ALL the data or no, we cannot debate it. 

It would entirely become a futile argument of ignorance. 

They know this. Mathematically, you have no data.

Conveniently, they don’t have to change and lower the crime rate (toward zero) if you don’t know how badly they’re doing their job.


5% of the latest reported US crime was rape.
That’s absurdly high for such a specific and brutal crime.
(This is what happens when you don’t keep serial offenders off the streets).
1 in 20 criminal acts was rape. You need all the data, America.

If I hadn’t screencapped this, you probably wouldn’t have believed me.

Irony! The dramatic irony!

Statistically you’re more likely to suffer domestic violence than stranger violence. That is horrifying. You were over twice as likely to get raped as burgled (1.99% in 2016). Do the libertarians care about bodily rights? Statistically they should care twice as much as about burglaries. The average citizen is twice as likely to be raped as generally assaulted, do you consider non-sexual assault a real problem?

You call yourself the First World? Greatest nation on Earth? Please, lead by example.

We’re right there with you. Bring back the standards of civil behavior, the etiquette. Update it, sure, but you do need it back again, what little data you have is starkly apparent in this. Perhaps enshrined in law, to make sure everyone is clear.

Not all- is NOT how statistics work.
Using big words doesn’t make it a debate.
You are not sounding intelligent to anyone who uses their brain.

Demand more data and think for yourselves.

Fellow Westerners are not the enemy. It is those who keep you shrouded in ignorance and wasting your time attending a digital circus of vicious fallacies. Oh but the delivery of their lies is so sweet, right?

Not all (blank) – they cant.

They don’t have to be.

It’s a false equivalence.

Rape doesn’t belong in the First World and neither do hostile foreigners.

Hopefully you can see why they won’t let me near a television camera.

You’re only watching the puppets who never raise real points. You can’t settle real issues in a soundbite or cheeky Youtube clip.

“Boys will be boys” is pathological altruism enabling the psychopathic of the male population against everyone else and sexist infantilisation.

“THE LEFT NEEDS PEOPLE TO NEED THEM.”

Can this become a meme?

http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/kanye-and-candace-the-redpilling-of-black-america-and-the-rise-of-free-thinking/

Well done for you waking up.

Welcome to the real world.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-23/kanye-west-redpill-rampage-now-tweeting-scott-adams-left-flips-wig

Ah, Tyler, who are you?

Nobody ever asks, do they?

Let’s get a conversation going about black genocide, then we can talk about white.

Link: The Litmus Test

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/what-is-big-issue-litmus-test-mass.html

Alt light: Multiculturalism is killing us.

Alt right: The liberalism that caused this is killing us.

Alt light: Brown people are the problem.

Alt right: We’re all the sodding problem!

Blue pill: when they do it, it’s evil.

Red pill: it’s evil.

Blue pill: we’re defending the West.

Red pill: what can we do, apart from laugh and cry over a meme stash?

Blue pill: we have the truth.

Red pill: we wish we didn’t have this.

Blue pill: we’re helping.

Red pill: stop fucking. Please, just… stop fucking.

Dear people who fuck everything up: stop.

Chew on this:

If it weren’t for the Sexual Revolution, Rotherham and Co. couldn’t be written off as a series of tiffs with boyfriends. SJWs don’t oppose Rotherham at all because they see it as collateral damage of what they caused, it’s a sign of their power. The culture you help them to maintain. They control men by the dick and you let them. You aren’t “showing them” at all! That’s why they laugh at you!

The world we live in is a direct outcome of how we act. Society is the mass effect of individual choices to virtue or vice. Evil leads to evil.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomie

Why do you think they got so upset when Trump voters said they wouldn’t sleep with them any more? The one genuine threat is ignoring them. The original MGTOWs got this.

By limiting his sexuality to one quality woman, a man is stronger.

http://www.mythencyclopedia.com/Go-Hi/Hera.html

In their most famous quarrel over love, Hera insisted that men received more sexual pleasure than women, while Zeus argued the opposite. In an attempt to end the dispute, Hera and Zeus agreed to consult Tiresias, a mortal who had been both male and female. Tiresias sided with Zeus, claiming that women had much greater pleasure than men. Enraged by his answer, Hera blinded Tiresias. Zeus compensated Tiresias for his loss of sight by giving him the gift of prophecy.

What is the cost of being an ugly man?

Since this topic is popping up again, I’ll indulge you a piece of new research.
The cost of being an ugly man?
$186k.
Yes, K.
The thing you won’t be after reading this.
Remember, if you’re offended, that must mean you’re ugly.


http://bigthink.com/dollars-and-sex/do-women-really-value-income-over-looks-in-a-mate

My students often interpret this result as saying that women really care about money, but that is not what it says at all$186,000 is a huge difference in income. If women didn’t care about looks and only cared about money, the figure would be much, much lower. This says that despite the impression that on the marriage market women really care about income, the evidence suggest that they also care about looks. They just care about income too.”

They care about not starving in the street after being abandoned. The fact it’s common this abandonment happens in our time is a bountiful supply of evidence that the fear is just.

Sample bias in the gold diggers versus everyone else. The pool wanting looks is all, the pool willing to overlook Darwinian fitness (good genes, high IQ correlates to good looks) for cash is a minority, and would that minority be faithful? Look at adultery stats, no. So really they do get both, just by lying about the looks thing to secure cash first. Most women are too honest to cheat, so they go right for the looks as long as he’s stable and sane.

Sex should not be confused with breeding. Marrying someone doesn’t mean breeding with them nowadays, in the era of the starter marriage. If they ask non-gold diggers about who they would breed with, in either sex, the number would soar because it’s critical to your baby’s health that they possess good genes.

Which sex invests more metabolically, again?

Ignore the lookism at your peril. Women naturally gravitate toward better-looking men (better genetic fitness) during times of hardship, for multi-layered protection. You want women to give you a chance? Fix the economy.

The manopshere won’t tell you things like this (and without twisting the findings) because they want shekels more than your wellbeing.

The Asian Questions

Off the top of my head, as promised,

  • Have you looked at the torture techniques these people practiced up until very, very recently?

feel free to write on these independently or come up with your own.
I’d be curious about a similar list for Whites. I’m fine with criticism.

  • Is nobody going to mention the fetishes?
  • They move to white universities and white-majority territories, why are they always unhappy with their own kind?
  • How many have ruined ancient Western monuments with scratchings and name carvings like a chav?
  • Without instruction, from baby age up, where would they be? Where’s the initiative? The culture must suppress and control them but how deep does this infantilisation go? Plenty of middle-aged men are under their elderly mother’s thumb, since they’re Matriarchal cultures?
  • Serious attitude angle worked in the media to boost the appearance of intelligence, rampant cheating when they measure themselves versus other races do, plenty of credentialism, really studious but never beyond curriculum (will this be on the exam?) Where is the Asian genius?
  • Care for attaining rank not performing role, tend to outsource and ethics are dodgy (type a country and ‘product scandal’, see what comes up, or ‘Country is selling’). China sells human flesh. They do. You can also buy dolphin and tigers.
  • Western manufacturing standards are laughed at. Why does everything break?
  • They don’t produce any classical art, they only copy and recite like a robot. WTF is that? If we LARPed their culture, we’d be professionally lynched. Burn The King & I.
  • Selecting for obedience doesn’t make for leaders, they lack the MAO genes to be useful in a war. If it weren’t for the staunch ingroup preference, they’d have been outbred or competed long before now.
  • If they’re so smart, why can’t they pool their IQ to make a better academic culture from the ground up?
  • Why do they have an aging population when they like math?
  • I don’t think white people understand just how much Chinese people hate them. They’re just good at hiding it most of the time. Fake smiles are common between LA and Japan. When will America realize the trade deals always favour the House? i.e. inferior grade metals.
  • It isn’t a class thing, it’s a race thing. They have long memories, like Muslims going on about the Crusades, but Opium wars. Why do they seem to have eerily gotten over things like Hiroshima instantly and without a shred of malice?
  • Why is social climbing still seen as the white thing to do?
  • Cool Asian Girl has replaced Cool White Girl and nobody is discussing it. The Cultural Marxists encourage this.
  • Have you noticed how they hate white people but steal our names, move into our cultures (even AFRICA) and breed with our men? Asians are the race that invented invasion, distinguish all of this from that.
  • Christianity has failed there but Islam is thriving, why is this?
  • There’s no distinction between men and women that they don’t force e.g. dress. Why is their sexual dimorphism so low? At least Africans look like adults, and it’s strange that mixed black/white children are criticized as ugly when far worse in the looks stakes are Asian combinations, who look alien-like. Nobody is ever allowed to talk about this. A black/white girl is going to be far, far prettier than an Asian/white hybrid mix. They appear to have worse health but it’s hardly studied e.g. the tendency to obesity seems greatest in this group of all groups.
  • It’s a fine line between love and hatred… about as thin as an alimony check.The Chinese judge their own as inferior to mixed half-whites. Is this purely based on appearance?
  • Why are they cut slack? When they do something wrong, people write it off. It must have been a mistake.. No?
  • When the West(ern Industrialization) from the British Revolution falls, they’ll eat each other. What happens when America stops providing its farming exports, including technology to keep the soil fertile?
  • They eat dogs and calls rice cuisine…. they are the most r-selected by population, over HALF the world and invading Africa. Why does Chinese food have such a great reputation when it’s on the level of a kebab?
  • Well, SE English average IQ is around 102. Highest SE Asian score average is 105. That’s WITH cheating in most cases and extra tuition, they’re maxxed out – plus the social science margin of error is 5% ….
    or 5 points. When the white man tries again, how much farther can we soar past them and what will the reaction be?
  • The worst SJWs are asian because collectivism should be a sin. Many evils are done in its name, see Holodomor, I chose a non-Asian example. Will Asians take over SJWism until it becomes synonymous or try to play both sides?
  • Why are the absolute worst divorce rape stories…. Asian ball-buster Tiger Mom? (Abusive)
  • Anime rips off non-Asian culture because they basically don’t have a history e.g. Yu Gi Oh rips off Egyptians so much I’m shocked the SJW say nothing, there are many Arthurian stories and their character have creepily white features. How much are we supposed to take when those shows are basically extended adverts for toys that you pay for? Why isn’t there a study on anime viewership in children reducing IQ? It might not be the internet or screen technology in general.
  • Why haven’t they evolved lactose tolerance and why continue to use famine chopsticks to draw out the process of eating?
  • There’s no Chinese language, for example, there are many, why isn’t there an efficient superior one? None have special properties to explain the world. They don’t want to evolve.
  • They expect the world to cater to them, why the entitlement?
  • The cultures suppresses the emergence of personality disorders in public but Princess Syndrome and Little Emperor are known problems, looming larger than in the West, suggesting that they’re incapable of K-selection and nobody connects narcissism to Asia, why is nobody studying it?
  • What are the values and principles aside from r-selected large families? …Anyone? They seem curiously blank, like a Mah Jongg tile.

I may add to this as inspiration strikes.

If you want a prompt, these redpilling questions can usually be pre-empted by

I just think it’s funny that-

TFW not red-pill according to newbies

My feelings are so hurt I’m gonna start a Youtube AND a Patreon!

http://meme-magic-agency.com/redpill/

There are clearly some BS questions in there.

A few are simply out-of-place PUA/MRA/MGTOW shit.

If you don’t want to roll back the Sexual Revolution of the 60s, you can’t roll back to any prior time period, Einsteins.

Like assuming Universal Suffrage is female-only (look up the actual laws), and the Alpha Bro question with no basis in statistics (the provider breeds, the genetic father remaining – father is a verb – increases fitness according to all known results, to start it’s called the Parental Investment Hypothesis). A ‘psychologist’ should know these things…..

Nothing about HBD or civic nationalism, for instance. It’s more of an Alt-Lite PUA list. You can’t own a concept like redpill. Reddit tried that. This is No True Redpill, trying to outgroup the people with the facts, the people who made this more than a few memes during election season. I have a special helicopter waiting just for you, red carpet for the self-proclaimed Alpha that doesn’t ‘believe’ in evolution.
Blaming the wimminz is what weak men do. It divides the two halves necessary for reproduction, the true purpose of feminism. Not shekels, that ‘genocide’ thing you mentioned…

17309647_193580121141068_377832536047522180_n

I’ve been using this tagline the best part of a decade so you can pry it from my cold dead fingers, you Tinder-loving gym fags. Not one traditionalist question or anything philosophical about how to structure a healthy society, so it’s all normie trying to signal edgy with zero productive ideas. Like critical theory for the right.

18268533_1354733824621330_5671789448836126303_n

You can’t outgroup the original founders, you Roosh-cucking degenerates.

But at least they called me Hitler.

17800007_1893017997654152_4251070920055965993_n

You won’t be a Party member of any Patriarchy without a family.

They’ll get bored when they realize the Alt Right won’t allow them to rest on their arses signalling on Twitter like an SJW. The AR is undergoing a purge of lightweights or else it’ll die and change form like a phoenix. You do have to get up and work for this, and give up all the deviance you’re addicted to. That’s the barrier to entry, not learning certain terms. If you refuse to marry, you don’t believe in marriage, you might as well be Milo. Your ‘sex life’ impresses no one.

But at least they called me Hitler, so you know I must be onto something.

Since when did autist mean factually correct?

Sluts on the morality of slutting:

manwhores

The first was Henry VIII.

I love how they’re going the way of NRx and trying to claim ‘official’ beliefs, like a doctrine of a religion. You don’t get to exclude people. You have no moral authority. You’re not running this show. Your MSM-baiting ‘gatherings’ involve the e-celeb cancer thinking it’s important. You’re as bad as Laci Green, you just come from the opposite claim, totally passively reacting to whatever the Left says, standing for nothing yourselves. Just anti-, opposing, spite.
Way to bury any ideology, formalize. Next these losers will get matching homoerotic hoodies to go with their Man-Gorilla book. What’s the size of a gorilla’s dick again? Tiny.

The people writing this shit are genetic suicides and atheists, their opinion is liberal trash.
Commie by behaviour. Look at dem birth rates… wait, that’s abortion from your ‘notches’. Proud papa. They were libertarian gamer trash porn addicts before Gamergate.

Meanwhile, you know they’re a degenerate slut trying to explain away all the party years (ongoing) by insulting people who score highly too. They’re still living it up in the Pussy Parade and expect an obedient wife to take on their STDs and cheating risk once they start losing more hair and getting fat.

R-types are defined by their selfish entitlement.
However, we know they’re incapable of monogamy so the joke’s on anyone dumb enough to ring it.

Still, better than 8values.

Actual hatefacts to offend everyone

OR
Nevermind, your fear is completely justified.

Feel free to make your own.

So let’s talk about the Red Pill, shall we?

This little red pill where any group is magically exempt from criticism… almost like a privilege. Offense is “how dare you imply my demographic is morally fallible!”

Shall we?