Aging fathers, ugly kids

That’s one solid explanation for why people are generally uglier nowadays, even the healthy weight.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886916311035

Paternal age negatively predicts offspring physical attractiveness in two, large, nationally representative datasets

Freeze your sperm at 18 for optimum freshness.

Effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness is investigated in two datasets.

Various covariates are utilized.

Significant negative effects are found in both datasets.

Effects are independent of birth order.

Findings consistent with paternal age as a source of new mutations in offspring.

Abstract

The effect of paternal age on offspring attractiveness has recently been investigated. Negative effects are predicted as paternal age is a strong proxy for the numbers of common de novo mutations found in the genomes of offspring. As an indicator of underlying genetic quality or fitness, offspring attractiveness should decrease as paternal age increases, evidencing the fitness-reducing effects of these mutations.

That’s a hard rectal red pill.

I’m sure the manosphere will try its hardest to ignore like the dead and defective babies.

https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Sins-Of-The-Fathers

The problem is, you think you have time.

Thus far results are mixed, with one study finding the predicted effect, and a second smaller study finding the opposite. Here the effect is investigated using two large and representative datasets (Add Health and NCDS),

holy Jesus a sound method

I almost fell off my high horse

both of which contain data on physical attractiveness and paternal age.

Validity! Validity! My queendom for some statistical validity!

The effect is present in both datasets, even after controlling for maternal age at subject’s birth, age of offspring, sex, race, parental and offspring (in the case of Add Health) socio-economic characteristics, parental age at first marriage (in the case of Add Health) and birth order.

The confound control is practically orgasmic, I can’t wait to see how they mansplain this one away.

That is perfect method. But it triggers butthurts and their precious feefees are hurt by the mere implication that degenerate older dads are bad for their kid’s health. Because all those upper crust respectable 1950s dads were like “60 is the new 20 lol!” Who gives a shit if your kids need you past high school? You got more priceless clubbing times you don’t remember, that’s what really matters. Not seeing your grandkids.

Class, race, sex, age at marriage, birth order, maternal age, offspring age – there’s literally nothing else to control for. Nothing. It’s flawless.

THESE. ARE. THE. STUDIES. WE. NEED.

Logically, since women are born with most of their eggs, there wouldn’t be a maternal effect. It isn’t constantly replenishing like the male gamete. Cell division’s a bitch. Male lifestyle for all his years prior

https://www.nhs.uk/news/pregnancy-and-child/dads-smoking-before-conception-harms-kids/

affects the child at conception (and even which sperm is conceived) far more than the details of pregnancy (minus pollutants it’s pretty much the same as in ancient times, the womb is not a new environment).

Maybe add child health although those studies already exist to cross-reference with attractiveness?

As in, are the girls more womanly as adults in WHR and the boys have more manly frames (broad shoulders, narrow waist, which should be a metric of its own)? Or less gender typical? Even androgynous, or fully gender-atypical?

Do younger or older fathers produce better-looking kids in the gendered sense?

[We can tell by looking at old photos but let’s pretend.]

Give me a time machine, please. The ugly wigger types hurt my eyes.

[I have also noted mannish looking sisters tend to be the older, “ugly” sister of two -coughs Beatrice- and the girly looking brothers tend to be the younger, usually gay one. Cannot unsee.]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595000682

e.g.

“In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance). Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms. The male beard is not obviously related to phenotypic quality and may have evolved through a process of runaway intersexual selection.”

The beard can also be a sign of poor grade genes e.g. savages, wolf man. Overall bone structure uber alles.

Maybe factor in sexual activity of the father prior to conception? Especially partner count and STDs. STDs are known to harm attractiveness in the host [coughs David Beckham, most of Hollywood] so why not the offspring’s?

Back to the top study:

The apparent robustness of the effect to different operationalizations of attractiveness suggests high generalizability, however the results must be interpreted with caution, as controls for parental levels of attractiveness were indirect only in the present study.

aka please don’t sue us but you know it’s true

But you can wait forever because the Jews said so!

Say, who owns all the biotech and IVF companies?

https://www.fertilitybridge.com/blog/2018/4/11/battleforivfmarketwallstreetvsprivatepractice

[chuckles in Israel shekels]

https://hmcisrael.com/specialty/ivf-israel/

“According to statistics, around 20% of couples wishing to conceive are faced with certain obstacles that inhibit a successful pregnancy.

Fertility Treatment is one of the most prioritized fields of medicine in Israel.”

Sure, you can wait for decades! Also, cut the kid when they’re born!

We need more future little Viagra users.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.2307/2648044

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7752-female-genital-mutilation-can-cause-infertility/

Does Circumcision Decrease the Fertility of Sperm in the Male?

“However, birth rates are much higher in countries where the men are predominantly uncircumcised.”

There is no question that an uncircumcised man has a cooler penis than a circumcised man in the flaccid state. For some reason, removal of the foreskin is the reason for this. There seems to be some sort of temperature sensor in the foreskin that may control penile temperature. Removing the foreskin gets rid of this sensor.

It only takes a few temperature degrees of difference to damage sperm. As the penis is in close proximity to the testicles, it’s quite likely that a cooler penis would help keep the testicles cooler (Remember that men are more potent in the colder months of the year). Under these condition, if the testicles got too cold, they can always be retracted closer to the body.

Almost like God gave men a prepuce solely for this evolutionary function in reproduction.

…Now consider this: Circumcised and uncircumcised men have the same penis temperature on full erection, as we stated earlier in this article. So, clearly, there is a specific reason why a natural-uncircumcised penis remains at a cooler temperature during the flaccid state. When the penis is erect it is no longer in close proximity with the testicles, so penile temperature should not affect the testicular temperature at this phase (be the penis circumcised or uncircumcised).

Upon orgasm, the penis tends to retract more into the pelvis (at least with my experience). Due to the friction and increased blood flow that occurred during the sexual act, it makes sense that the penis will have an increase in temperature in a flaccid state post-sex than in a flaccid state previous to the sexual act. Could this retraction be another mechanism for the “heated” penis to steer clear of the testicles?

Go there, science.

Circumcision and Male Fertility: Is There a Link?

Scientists have recently concluded that circumcision can help with infertility in males suffering from two very specific diseases.

So… not generalizable.

Some woman perv studies after all that penis talk.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513814000269

Women’s faces and voices may be cues to their reproductive potential. If so, then individual differences in indices of female fecundity and residual reproductive value, such as hormonal profiles, body composition, and age, should be associated with women’s facial and vocal attractiveness to men. However, previous research on these associations is sparse, has rendered mixed results, and is limited to Western samples. The current study therefore explored relationships between correlates of reproductive capability (testosterone levels, age, and body mass index [BMI]) and facial and vocal attractiveness in women from industrial and foraging societies. Women’s facial and vocal attractiveness was associated with each of these indicators in at least one of the two samples. The patterns of these associations suggest that women’s faces and voices provide cues to both common and unique components of reproductive potential and help explain the evolution of men’s mating preferences.

Lesson: Avoid the manjaw.

Women change their vocal pitch all the time though. European women are taught to make it lower at school (speak up = louder, lower pitch), Asians try to make it higher. The key is how they sound when hysterically upset. That’s their true level. Europeans go up, Asians down.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513812000475

Attractive facial features in women are assumed to signal fertility, but whether facial attractiveness predicts reproductive success in women is still a matter of debate. We investigated the association between facial attractiveness at young adulthood and reproductive life history—number of children and pregnancies—in women of a rural community. For the analysis of reproductive success, we divided the sample into women who used contraceptives and women who did not.

So partnered, married women. Not single ones.

Introducing two-dimensional geometric morphometric methodology, we analysed which specific characteristics in facial shape drive the assessment of attractiveness and covary with lifetime reproductive success. A set of 93 (semi)landmarks was digitized as two-dimensional coordinates in postmenopausal faces. We calculated the degree of fluctuating asymmetry and regressed facial shape on facial attractiveness at youth and reproductive success. Among women who never used hormonal contraceptives, we found attractive women to have more biological offspring than less attractive women. These findings are not affected by sociodemographic variables. Postmenopausal faces corresponding to high reproductive success show more feminine features—facial characteristics previously assumed to be honest cues to fertility. Our findings support the notion that facial attractiveness at the age of mate choice predicts reproductive success and that facial attractiveness is based on facial characteristics, which seem to remain stable until postmenopausal age.

Menopause is not the face equalizer you think.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816302318

African and European perception of African female attractiveness

Dare you to do the same study with every race judging every other.

Majority of research on attractiveness is restricted to faces of European origin. The perception of attractiveness may, however, vary across communities due to variations in both facial morphology and local standards of beauty. We investigated the relative contribution of four facial markers of attractiveness based on 101 female facial portraits (standardized, non-manipulated) from Cameroon and Namibia, which were assessed by local male raters and by raters from a distant European population, the Czech Republic. Images from Cameroon include only women of Bantu origin, while Namibians are represented by women of both Bantu (Owambo/Herero) and Nama origin. While controlling for age and BMI, we explored the relationship between female attractiveness and a set of facial traits: fluctuating asymmetry, averageness, shape sexual dimorphism, and skin color (rated and measured in CIELab color space).

In the Cameroonian sample, local male raters favored lighter-skinned female faces with morphology closer to average. The attractiveness of Nama women as rated by Nama men positively correlated with lighter complexion, but this did not extend to rating by Cameroonian men. The attractiveness of Namibian Owambo/Herero women was positively associated with facial femininity and lighter complexion when judged by both Cameroonian and Nama male raters. In all samples, the attractiveness as rated by Czech men was predicted by age and BMI, but not by skin color. We found no significant association between attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry in any of the tested samples. When controlling for age, the effect of skin color on attractiveness turned to be non-significant in the Owambo/Herrero and Nama sample, but remained significant in the Cameroonian sample. Variations in skin color thus represent an important factor of African female attractiveness within the African context, but they do not seem to affect judgements made by European raters.

They don’t want any of them.

Sensitivity to some facial markers of female attractiveness thus seems to be restricted to regional populations and/or constrained by shared ethnicity.

Paler women have more oestrogen. So duh.

Women reject old guys who’d give them dead or ugly kids:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816301283

“This finding is consistent with men’s stated preference for young, fertile women in mating and suggests that the typical pattern is generated by women’s limiting role in mating.”

aka their gender role

“older men tend to marry older women, including those who are peri- and post-menopausal”

TIL Korea is so degenerate it has slave markets. Ooof.

So much for the myth that young women have the hots for them. Yeah, I’m sure the Jap schoolgirl came onto you, right perv?

Deadbeats are the end of the West:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513816303671

Research in evolutionary psychology, and life history theory in particular, has yielded important insights into the developmental processes that underpin variation in growth, psychological functioning, and behavioral outcomes across individuals. Yet, there are methodological concerns that limit the ability to draw causal inferences about human development and psychological functioning within a life history framework. The current study used a simulation-based modeling approach to estimate the degree of genetic confounding in tests of a well-researched life history hypothesis: that father absence (X) is associated with earlier age at menarche (Y). The results demonstrate that the genetic correlation between X and Y can confound the phenotypic association between the two variables, even if the genetic correlation is small—suggesting that failure to control for the genetic correlation between X and Y could produce a spurious phenotypic correlation. We discuss the implications of these results for research on human life history, and highlight the utility of incorporating genetically sensitive tests into future life history research.

I don’t think debtor’s prisons will come back – but if you breed it, you should feed it. I think the abandoned women that existed since Biblical times will just hire bounty hunters to shoot the first family deserter for a share of his life insurance policy.

Patriarchs everywhere would rejoice at culling the cads. The women get a widow’s pension.

Everyone wins. Hey, you said “until death do us part”. Men used to die by their oaths.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381400052X

I have noticed that immigrant men have a higher pitch than their non-immigrant relatives.

Maybe the act of immigration impairs masculinity?

Low male voice pitch may communicate potential benefits for offspring in the form of heritable health and/or dominance, whereas access to resources may be indicated by correlates of socioeconomic status, such as sociolinguistic features. Here, we examine if voice pitch and social dialect influence women’s perceptions of men’s socioeconomic status and attractiveness. In Study 1, women perceived lower pitched male voices as higher in socioeconomic status than higher pitched male voices.

A lot of PUAs get shot down for 1. being brown and feeling entitled to a white woman, the lowest miscegenation group also further sickened by repeated forced “refugee” interactions and 2. having a high pitch voice and effete face compared to their national relatives. Compare within the white race, the “Latin lover” in Italy versus Italian immigrants raised and living in London, who sound like cartoon chipmunks by comparison.

Yes, we notice.

No, you can’t change it. We notice.

Same applies to white men who moved South so it appears to be immigration. Either being an immigrant or the act itself makes a man less manly. Most obviously, torso body fat deposition like a woman of their group and the sisters become like the men at home, more athletic.

In Study 2, women independently perceived lower pitched voices and higher status sociolinguistic dialects as higher in socioeconomic status and attractiveness.

It isn’t the money, it’s the genes.

Good genes, good brains, good money. Fixating on the money is what ugly guys do – Muslim prince to Jewish media mogul.

We also found a significant interaction wherein women preferred lower pitched men’s voices more often when dialects were lower in sociolinguistic status than when they were higher in sociolinguistic status.

Capacity to protect. Not a desk jockey. The middle-class is effeminate. They want army. No cowards.

Women also perceived lower pitched voices as higher in socioeconomic status more often when dialects were higher in sociolinguistic status than when lower in sociolinguistic status.

Women know quality, really? Almost like our lives depend on it.

Finally, women’s own self-rated socioeconomic status was positively related to their preferences for voices with higher status sociolinguistic dialects, but not to their preferences for voice pitch.

Plenty of men chose to marry down to get a looker out of their genetic league, hypergamy.

Erotic capital is worth it, as you can tell by the fertility study above, even post-menopausal they’re better-looking.

Hence, women’s preferences for traits associated with potentially biologically heritable benefits, such as low voice pitch, are moderated by the presence of traits associated with resource accrual, such as social dialect markers. However, women’s preferences for language markers of resource accrual may be functionally independent from preferences for potential biological indicators of heritable benefits, such as voice pitch.

Women…. making…. mate choices?

mutation load is important?

 

Redpill 101

This may be reproduced elsewhere freely on the understanding there is no distortion, editing, credit-stealing or profit.

If I could talk to every thirteen year-old, here is what I would tell them, anonymously. Because God knows, we need primers. Sincere, accurate primers. 3,500 words approx. Here’s what you need, to get up to speed.

You are a slave. You may not believe but your prison is money. You do not need a birth certificate, it is a deed of ownership. The filigree paper betrays its bond status and the ‘government’ representing your owners are entitled with it to take out debt (the hallmark of a serf) on the basis of your future labour. You do not need to consent, you were born to them so they own you. You can never escape this, they own your children too. Your birth certificate is assigned a number. It may not be burned into your arm but it defines you and your entire life.

‘Net worth’ is an illusion, that number is everything.

Do your owners have birth certificates and numbers? Nobody knows. You cannot check because you are not allowed to know their full names, they stay conspicuously off every ‘rich’ list and you wouldn’t know their face if you passed them in the street. But you’re so smart, right?

Well, if you’re reading this, I think you are.

The government is not the representative of the People, the government is a representative of the private banks. As it stands and this is self-evident. The government produces nothing, neither does any bank. Fountain pen money is a fantasy, an illusion, utterly imaginary. Your entire system of ‘work’ is based on a lie. There is no such thing as a public bank, they made it illegal. Regulations stifle more honest competition. We live in a plutocracy pretending to be a meritocracy, otherwise you’d revolt at the blatant classism. You’ve probably never heard that word before, you’re not allowed to know it. The talking heads on TV and Twitter cannot use it. They fear it though, they’re deathly chilled if you bring it up and speak of it in hushed tones, privately. I heard them. These people are not your intellectual betters. Look at their mess of a private life, they’re useful idiots. They are often your moral inferiors. This applies all the way up to the top, your owners and theirs, for they are Plato’s natural slaves. Education is not IQ and they own academia, they are not better than you. They need those barriers to oppress you. Without the advantages their children inherit (read: not money, but power) they would demonstrate inferiority to you, hard workers. The leech resents the host. You hold up their pyramid, the original pyramid scheme.
If you were ever to realise this, you would severely reduce consumption of their poison products, the ones they make because they hate you. Every single mention or sighting of a consumer product in a video or article is an advert. This is an open secret. Fight Club mocked it. Influencers don’t discover a product all at once by chance, they’re like drug pushers with shitty candles. Do you think spending like the indebted will get you socially accepted? They rely on that feeling to control you and it is control, to coerce you into convincing yourself. If truly influential and hence worth befriending, they are not spending their money, but their great-great grandparent’s. You are not spending the same money. The first piggy at the trough gets the most grain and the core banks trickle down their nonsense to the lesser and down through the classes until the poor’s purchasing power is almost nil. The journalists faint on a well-placed couch and bemoan why, oh why don’t they have savings? Their parents were exploited too, through many generations. Records of banking families from the time of bubonic plague show the same names as today, what regression to the mean? Don’t read Galton. They cannot simply give you a fair (minus verbal section) IQ test age 12 (SATs are now banned here) and be done with it, their rotten fruit would suffer. Their weak seed would wither and die. The game is rigged. Glamour and luxury are illusions pushed by people who think a few zeros will make happy. But a zero is empty. Hollywood people are miserable, in a mansion. They lie for a living and their spouse is homosexual and cheating. This applies to your owners too. The faux elite, as they encourage you to call them. The real secret is that there is nothing elite about them. If you spoke to them at a bar, they would not dazzle you with poetic phrasings or the calibre of their intellect. They are over-educated morons, parroting things you’ve been culturally indoctrinated by their parents to believe are important – abstract ‘art’, wine, moral relativism and white walls barren as their personality. They mock things they use to gain advantage, used by God himself as signs to us of divine providence like the birth of Jesus but do not wish you to notice nor use these gifts yourself, as the early Christians did. For example, astrology has better predictive outcomes when studied scientifically than therapy. You are not told this. They time their money movements and wars to this. Most therapy exists to shame you for your existence or to trap those noticing the evil of this system (a gas-lighting effort) and push, you guessed it, more poison products. The poisoned apple to our Snow White. The longer you go to therapy, the more likely you are to kill yourself. Freud’s talking cure worked on no genuine pathology (and he was a doctor) but he was trying to fix his hereditary neuroses via intellectualisation and projection, things all congenital idiots do. Obviously, the problem is never them, just their life. It’s a confounding coincidence. Jung was right to leave him and his narrow, inapplicable “Jewish psychology” as he called it, that encouraged self-loathing (they are the only modern matriarchal culture) instead of cultural love and self-culture, as it was called. It’s been rebranded as individualism and self-improvement to sell you overpriced shit in January. To keep you feeling alone and vulnerable, atomised and adrift. Gyms exist to encourage an eating disorder, you do not need a homoerotic gym cult to exercise. Gym products can be more expensive than child support. This is the tip of a huge iceberg of deceptions, they trade in lies, quite literally. They tax your existence and claim to own the very air you dare breathe. It isn’t bad unless they can tax it. You tune into The News (not some news, or a selection of news, THE news) to find out what’s bad, admit it. You tune in for your chosen frequency of brainwashing because, relatively, it’s a short term relief. That’s how they “make” the BIG bucks. Big zero.

Big zero > little zero, you see. Gold stars for grown-ups. ‘Net’ worth, because you’re a big fish, aren’t you?

But… the “most powerful nation on the face of the Earth” – source, has no savings. Hmm. People with savings have power. People with savings can tell corporate masters to do one. People with savings get to look around and notice the way society is going. People with savings have options.

You’re not allowed to have options.

Vote for Liar A or Liar B. Buy rank poison cola A or B. Breed with useless eater A or B. Wear short polyester in style A or B. People in concentration camps weren’t suffering the indignity of polyester.

Do everything you’re supposed to. You’re so individual!

Your teachers tell every kid they have potential. Yes, the potential to fund their unearned retirement.

Normies have a shit quality of life because they trusted these people, the enemy. The enemy of the people. Know them by their fruit.

“National” debt – not “politician promises”. Cultural Marxists lie with language, including Master-Suppression techniques.

Papers and radio are propaganda, they dumbed down the language and what was discussed. Watered-down communications. Families used to talk to one another. Wartime conveniently encouraged them to gather round the radio instead. Storytelling made us loyal to one another as a culture, online this is called a chan. When the ancient philosophers gave speeches, who ever said they weren’t funny? Could you listen for hours to something that wasn’t funny? Did they walk miles for something that wasn’t funny? They’re more George Carlin than anything if you learn how to read them. It’s the same with plays. What we find funny hasn’t really changed in two thousand years, the ‘media’ limits our self-culture by force-feeding us bullshit and clipping our critical wings. People have urges and are lied to about why. Sexual arousal can never be based on fear or disgust, they say to men, you must secretly want it. This is gaslighting. To women, you want to watch this cooking show online not because you miss your mother but because it’s trendy. …Food is a trend now.

They have fully monetised food.

“You can’t eat that!” “Are you sure you should eat that?” “I read you shouldn’t eat that!”

And they have the nerve to lecture you on the evils of shaming and ‘body positivity’.

Yes, they’re very pozzed alright. The only non-sinful pleasure we must take daily. The only response to “Why are you eating that?” should be “I need it to live, fuck you.”

The Little Hitlers are party cogs, aware of it or not. The gestapo was nothing without informants, the papers have nothing without SJWs whipping out their phones to film half an argument. They are never named for their ‘service’.

There are seven million views on a woman poaching an egg, clearly something is very wrong here.

They turn you against one another with petty irrationalities as a distraction, a red herring from the system. Mentacide precedes bodily genocide. You fall over one another internationally, begging to be exploited.

Does America have a military without Israel’s guns?

The over-educated aspect has merely trickled down in the middle-class ‘journalist’ class to the point it becomes noticeable. The sarcastic ‘elite’ are mediocre after many generations of incest at best, and usually below average. It’s pissed away by the third generation under ordinary selection pressures (money, fame etc) because decadence sets into the second generation and degeneracy into the third. Degeneration is in the germline, it’s epigenetic. It would be game over (game: they are playing us for fools) for their long line of sociopaths.

Go Galt, avoid debt. Don’t buy tat, happiness comes from your cultural heritage. Those ‘luxury brands’ were all made in the same Chinese factory by child slaves, the difference is branding. Shame the Left for their slave phone, their slave-picked coffee, their slave-grown drugs. They own more slaves by volume than any plantation merchant. They have no virtue as consumers. Tim Cook fucks little boys (and suffers from a case of Podesta face) but they still buy Apple products. There are more slaves alive today than ever, yet they gaslight these rape victims as ‘sex workers’ to supply their Weinsteins, ignoring the suicide rate and abuse histories. The market is owned by merchants and merchants cannot turn a profit unless they convince you not to seek out the goods yourself. They must be the middle man, they cannot work. Meaningless bland items belonging nowhere will make you miserable. Burn your Ikea furniture, it’s illegally sourced from Ancient European forests anyway. Watch that scene in Fight Club, they’ve been mocking you this entire time. Faux rebellion is the worst thing you can do. Rebellion in this system isn’t buying shit. It’s buying less of their shit.
They are trying to snare you into giving up various self-reliances e.g. carpentry, from harvesting your own water to growing your own food. You need them, says the abusive spouse.


They have been doing this for generations, it’s well documented. They want you totally enslaved before they replace you with machines. You think those machines will work for you? Why? The sum value of your organs doesn’t touch that thing. At this point, your life becomes redundant to them, they’ve been selectively breeding you for obedience over two world wars and many smaller incidents, including the civil war they propagandise as ‘terrorism’.
Do not fund people who hate you. This is most important when it comes to the food supply. Buy the best or the cheapest profit margin at the smallest local brand. Do NOT fund them. Every penny of your productivity into their siphon is a drop of blood signing your death warrant. A cow that produces no milk infuriates the farmer. Why have adverts been getting aggressive? They resent you for their need of you and are actively using their funds to replace you – this includes genetic engineering. Give them no genetic blueprint of you, your DNA contains your family’s abilities. They are thieves of time and talent.
They want you to distrust your kin. Do they distrust their own? They want you to believe in a global brotherhood or sisterhood but you are not related to those people, they have different aspirations for the world you must live in. Would you want to live in their country? If not, you are not kin. Culture is genetic, wherever we go we carry our ancestors with us.
They have been selectively breeding us like racehorses since at least the time of Darwin. They are Social Darwinists of the worst order by their action and dehumanisation of us all. They profit from your sons dying on the battlefield, they take a cut when they push poison into your baby’s formula. They will steal the best (genetic combinations) and cull the rest with no guilt whatsoever. All their talk of sustainability bars discussion of population size, density and national IQs. You are not allowed to notice. You are not allowed to think for yourself, any more than a farm animal questioning the farmer.
Theft, called debt, called usury, is the primary weapon. Fractional reserve is the con, the system of your slavery. This tune is winding down and there aren’t enough chairs. Do not attack one another, they want you to pick yourselves off, go after the people who set this up, who designed the system and did this to you. Inflation doesn’t exist, it’s a myth. There’s no “miracle” in compound interest – they breed and steal from the poor. It’s slavery, work to live, slaves paid ‘income tax’. Mortality is used as a weapon to weaken the workers. You earned water and they put a hole in your cup, to drain it for themselves. They don’t work and they certainly don’t pay tax to themselves!

Do not permit leeches wherever possible and guard your food from poison. This is very simple.

Saving for retirement means nothing if you waste it in a hospital or die young. Most disease is caused by the bad diet from foods their relatives produce and design to be appetizing to you, like force-feeding a duck or a pig. They know this because they bought out or, by corporate espionage, forced out the competition to dominate the medical market. Which country owns all the biotech? Which country is holding humanity hostage?
Deny them their ‘gender war’. You need family, they need family too. The corruption and evil is intergenerational. Family loyalty frightens them in the commoner. They incite child and teenage rebellion, sowing seeds of discord for years. Teenage rebellion was invented in the 20th century, vital for GDP. If you don’t listen to the experienced, you’ll make costly mistakes that could’ve been avoided. There is nothing more cliche than a teenager who irrationally hates their parents. Do not be a worthless stereotype, they lose. The life outcome studies on bullies and ‘popular kids’ are clear. They were completely average and conformity got them ….nothing, as they merit.

Popular – film propaganda speak for bland, immoral, stupid and average.

Popularity isn’t love, it’s Pleasure Island. They told you. Hedonists are losers. They are asses, sold as slaves by psychopathic foxes and Satanists, then working until they die. They told you. The Devil is in the details and, after all, you must consent to sell your soul. Evil cannot be undone.

You need your kin to survive and their propaganda will cause you to deny any preservation instinct at the cost of indebting yourself to them. ‘Rich’ people are allowed to think they’re successful. They are given more ‘money’ the more they seem to have. People say this makes no sense. Why give them a bigger line, the less they need? All the more rope to hang you by, dear!

Why bait a hook with an especially large, juicy morsel? It’s the same principle.

They know how you think, observation is part of the breeding process. Kipling was a Freemason, a religion of male witches who share a hatred and womb envy of women with Orthodox Jews.
Yet, there is no Biblical (lawful, by divine law) debt without a debt jubilee. A car without wheels is just a seat.
A creditor will allow a debtor to take on as much “debt” as they like, so long as they pay it back in real labour i.e. mortality, hours worked. That is the reason. Understand that and you understand the whole system.

You cannot win, it is rigged. It kills you.

Formal alternatives are not allowed but self-reliance terrifies them.
How does one scare a leech? Go on a diet. Rely on what is local to you and proximate spiritually.
Naming the Beast gives them legal power (crony government) but starving the Beast is free and cannot be traced. Disappear off their radar, for the most part. More importantly, talk about things that matter, things that exclude them, debunk them, things they haven’t the wit to care about. Isolate them and they’ll shrivel up and die.

Why is there never a trend for reading past a 7th grade level? Why are children given “YA fiction” with “political themes” instead of the classics? It’s so awful there are new ones every year. If every parent sat down and read their child the Iliad, they’d brick it. Treasure Island is a safer in.

Every attempt you make at true improvement is free. It makes you a little bit better than their heirs. Nothing terrifies them more. This isn’t limited to children, friends too. Note and improve the quality of your conversations. Do you talk about people like some embittered town gossip? Why do they sell smartphones to minors, knowing the medical damage? Their curiosity will divert from art and the classics to a Hollywood whore’s tits.

They do not get to tell us what is important, yet we obey what they offer us. We allow them to act as a moral authority. People who brag to us they do not believe in morality (absolutes like good). They instruct, we obey.

Do not obey. Do not allow it to pollute your life.

Do not believe their lies. Do you think Kylie Jenner is a billionaire? They also feed off of your attention. They feed off of it in ways you cannot imagine. They are living rent free in your head, providing significant opportunity cost to your personal prosperity in life and draining you spiritually with this parody of life they call materialism. If we all stopped treating them as equals, they’d have to create something for themselves. They cannot do this. The Left (media) cannot meme, they can only imitate – poorly. They are too stupid to know the score from within that bubble or have a sense of humour. You cannot fix stupid, so strike. Do not hold or continue a conversation with a leftie. They are not adults.

They are overgrown children. They fully support their own murder (euthanasia, death care pathways).

If they cannot answer the following questions, they are not adults.

Is the Federal Reserve federal? What is it backed by? [faith in men] Is it constitutional -to have private monies?

Does the Bank of England belong to the English people? What is it backed by? [faith in men] Why was Cromwell’s corpse dragged through the street by the English? Why did our best modern financial system involve a currency of sticks amongst workers? [high trust, workers only] Why did the BoE step in to replace this? [war, national debt]

If they cannot explain the ROOT of the thing they use everyday, they are children. They are ignorant by choice, which is worse than being stupid, it is malice.
Love of money is the ROOT of all evil, look for the root in all things. Cui bono? Follow the money. The root of all evil is exploiting human beings made by the true God (creator) to make a ‘profit’. Capitalism, by definition, is consensual and from an even keel of countrymen.

Use their stolen tools in ways they cannot corrupt. Be the better man (or woman). They allowed us online to ruin our families with pornography (adultery, according to Jesus! hypofrontality damage, according to addiction science) and social media to encourage conflict between people we rely on in real life.

There is no pithy ending. Don’t be the problem. The traitors get guillotined too.
Values are delusions if you keep making excuses to never act on them. They rely on your weak character.

Fun fact: Before the French were socialists, they hated the rulers because their children often went missing from Paris or were picked up as vagrants by the French King’s police, never to be seen again. Rumours of purple baths circulated. Is it a coincidence they moved the court to a hunting lodge (all things labelled lodge are a hunting lodge) where captured prey is brought to be consumed in secret? Nowadays, they’re a tad more civilized, it’s called a ‘care home‘, or ‘modelling’ or a ‘club’.

[What do Tim Cook and Henry Cavill have in common? They both enjoy deep explorations of Asian minor.]

“THE LEFT NEEDS PEOPLE TO NEED THEM.”

Can this become a meme?

http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/kanye-and-candace-the-redpilling-of-black-america-and-the-rise-of-free-thinking/

Well done for you waking up.

Welcome to the real world.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-23/kanye-west-redpill-rampage-now-tweeting-scott-adams-left-flips-wig

Ah, Tyler, who are you?

Nobody ever asks, do they?

Let’s get a conversation going about black genocide, then we can talk about white.

Link: The Litmus Test

http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/what-is-big-issue-litmus-test-mass.html

Alt light: Multiculturalism is killing us.

Alt right: The liberalism that caused this is killing us.

Alt light: Brown people are the problem.

Alt right: We’re all the sodding problem!

Blue pill: when they do it, it’s evil.

Red pill: it’s evil.

Blue pill: we’re defending the West.

Red pill: what can we do, apart from laugh and cry over a meme stash?

Blue pill: we have the truth.

Red pill: we wish we didn’t have this.

Blue pill: we’re helping.

Red pill: stop fucking. Please, just… stop fucking.

Dear people who fuck everything up: stop.

Chew on this:

If it weren’t for the Sexual Revolution, Rotherham and Co. couldn’t be written off as a series of tiffs with boyfriends. SJWs don’t oppose Rotherham at all because they see it as collateral damage of what they caused, it’s a sign of their power. The culture you help them to maintain. They control men by the dick and you let them. You aren’t “showing them” at all! That’s why they laugh at you!

The world we live in is a direct outcome of how we act. Society is the mass effect of individual choices to virtue or vice. Evil leads to evil.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomie

Why do you think they got so upset when Trump voters said they wouldn’t sleep with them any more? The one genuine threat is ignoring them. The original MGTOWs got this.

By limiting his sexuality to one quality woman, a man is stronger.

http://www.mythencyclopedia.com/Go-Hi/Hera.html

In their most famous quarrel over love, Hera insisted that men received more sexual pleasure than women, while Zeus argued the opposite. In an attempt to end the dispute, Hera and Zeus agreed to consult Tiresias, a mortal who had been both male and female. Tiresias sided with Zeus, claiming that women had much greater pleasure than men. Enraged by his answer, Hera blinded Tiresias. Zeus compensated Tiresias for his loss of sight by giving him the gift of prophecy.

What is the cost of being an ugly man?

Since this topic is popping up again, I’ll indulge you a piece of new research.
The cost of being an ugly man?
$186k.
Yes, K.
The thing you won’t be after reading this.
Remember, if you’re offended, that must mean you’re ugly.


http://bigthink.com/dollars-and-sex/do-women-really-value-income-over-looks-in-a-mate

My students often interpret this result as saying that women really care about money, but that is not what it says at all$186,000 is a huge difference in income. If women didn’t care about looks and only cared about money, the figure would be much, much lower. This says that despite the impression that on the marriage market women really care about income, the evidence suggest that they also care about looks. They just care about income too.”

They care about not starving in the street after being abandoned. The fact it’s common this abandonment happens in our time is a bountiful supply of evidence that the fear is just.

Sample bias in the gold diggers versus everyone else. The pool wanting looks is all, the pool willing to overlook Darwinian fitness (good genes, high IQ correlates to good looks) for cash is a minority, and would that minority be faithful? Look at adultery stats, no. So really they do get both, just by lying about the looks thing to secure cash first. Most women are too honest to cheat, so they go right for the looks as long as he’s stable and sane.

Sex should not be confused with breeding. Marrying someone doesn’t mean breeding with them nowadays, in the era of the starter marriage. If they ask non-gold diggers about who they would breed with, in either sex, the number would soar because it’s critical to your baby’s health that they possess good genes.

Which sex invests more metabolically, again?

Ignore the lookism at your peril. Women naturally gravitate toward better-looking men (better genetic fitness) during times of hardship, for multi-layered protection. You want women to give you a chance? Fix the economy.

The manopshere won’t tell you things like this (and without twisting the findings) because they want shekels more than your wellbeing.