The Asian Questions

Off the top of my head, as promised,

  • Have you looked at the torture techniques these people practiced up until very, very recently?

feel free to write on these independently or come up with your own.
I’d be curious about a similar list for Whites. I’m fine with criticism.

  • Is nobody going to mention the fetishes?
  • They move to white universities and white-majority territories, why are they always unhappy with their own kind?
  • How many have ruined ancient Western monuments with scratchings and name carvings like a chav?
  • Without instruction, from baby age up, where would they be? Where’s the initiative? The culture must suppress and control them but how deep does this infantilisation go? Plenty of middle-aged men are under their elderly mother’s thumb, since they’re Matriarchal cultures?
  • Serious attitude angle worked in the media to boost the appearance of intelligence, rampant cheating when they measure themselves versus other races do, plenty of credentialism, really studious but never beyond curriculum (will this be on the exam?) Where is the Asian genius?
  • Care for attaining rank not performing role, tend to outsource and ethics are dodgy (type a country and ‘product scandal’, see what comes up, or ‘Country is selling’). China sells human flesh. They do. You can also buy dolphin and tigers.
  • Western manufacturing standards are laughed at. Why does everything break?
  • They don’t produce any classical art, they only copy and recite like a robot. WTF is that? If we LARPed their culture, we’d be professionally lynched. Burn The King & I.
  • Selecting for obedience doesn’t make for leaders, they lack the MAO genes to be useful in a war. If it weren’t for the staunch ingroup preference, they’d have been outbred or competed long before now.
  • If they’re so smart, why can’t they pool their IQ to make a better academic culture from the ground up?
  • Why do they have an aging population when they like math?
  • I don’t think white people understand just how much Chinese people hate them. They’re just good at hiding it most of the time. Fake smiles are common between LA and Japan. When will America realize the trade deals always favour the House? i.e. inferior grade metals.
  • It isn’t a class thing, it’s a race thing. They have long memories, like Muslims going on about the Crusades, but Opium wars. Why do they seem to have eerily gotten over things like Hiroshima instantly and without a shred of malice?
  • Why is social climbing still seen as the white thing to do?
  • Cool Asian Girl has replaced Cool White Girl and nobody is discussing it. The Cultural Marxists encourage this.
  • Have you noticed how they hate white people but steal our names, move into our cultures (even AFRICA) and breed with our men? Asians are the race that invented invasion, distinguish all of this from that.
  • Christianity has failed there but Islam is thriving, why is this?
  • There’s no distinction between men and women that they don’t force e.g. dress. Why is their sexual dimorphism so low? At least Africans look like adults, and it’s strange that mixed black/white children are criticized as ugly when far worse in the looks stakes are Asian combinations, who look alien-like. Nobody is ever allowed to talk about this. A black/white girl is going to be far, far prettier than an Asian/white hybrid mix. They appear to have worse health but it’s hardly studied e.g. the tendency to obesity seems greatest in this group of all groups.
  • It’s a fine line between love and hatred… about as thin as an alimony check.The Chinese judge their own as inferior to mixed half-whites. Is this purely based on appearance?
  • Why are they cut slack? When they do something wrong, people write it off. It must have been a mistake.. No?
  • When the West(ern Industrialization) from the British Revolution falls, they’ll eat each other. What happens when America stops providing its farming exports, including technology to keep the soil fertile?
  • They eat dogs and calls rice cuisine…. they are the most r-selected by population, over HALF the world and invading Africa. Why does Chinese food have such a great reputation when it’s on the level of a kebab?
  • Well, SE English average IQ is around 102. Highest SE Asian score average is 105. That’s WITH cheating in most cases and extra tuition, they’re maxxed out – plus the social science margin of error is 5% ….
    or 5 points. When the white man tries again, how much farther can we soar past them and what will the reaction be?
  • The worst SJWs are asian because collectivism should be a sin. Many evils are done in its name, see Holodomor, I chose a non-Asian example. Will Asians take over SJWism until it becomes synonymous or try to play both sides?
  • Why are the absolute worst divorce rape stories…. Asian ball-buster Tiger Mom? (Abusive)
  • Anime rips off non-Asian culture because they basically don’t have a history e.g. Yu Gi Oh rips off Egyptians so much I’m shocked the SJW say nothing, there are many Arthurian stories and their character have creepily white features. How much are we supposed to take when those shows are basically extended adverts for toys that you pay for? Why isn’t there a study on anime viewership in children reducing IQ? It might not be the internet or screen technology in general.
  • Why haven’t they evolved lactose tolerance and why continue to use famine chopsticks to draw out the process of eating?
  • There’s no Chinese language, for example, there are many, why isn’t there an efficient superior one? None have special properties to explain the world. They don’t want to evolve.
  • They expect the world to cater to them, why the entitlement?
  • The cultures suppresses the emergence of personality disorders in public but Princess Syndrome and Little Emperor are known problems, looming larger than in the West, suggesting that they’re incapable of K-selection and nobody connects narcissism to Asia, why is nobody studying it?
  • What are the values and principles aside from r-selected large families? …Anyone? They seem curiously blank, like a Mah Jongg tile.

I may add to this as inspiration strikes.

If you want a prompt, these redpilling questions can usually be pre-empted by

I just think it’s funny that-

Link: Inferiority: the opposite of genius

I don’t expect those who pretend to care about the IQ dearth to read around.
I post these things for the intellectually honest.

Hating women

It may seem strange to include this specific form of hatred with the list, but a fact is that many inferiors have a deep hatred of women, which makes it a characteristic of inferiority.

If we’re examining personality traits of inferiors, it is completely valid as a behavioural marker.

Just as with geniuses, most inferiors are men. The ultimate in this are feats like the burning of widows, or demanding women to spend their lives indoors or walk six metres behind their husband, covered from head to toe with their genitals cut up beyond all repair.

In addition, rape is standard behaviour of inferiors, typically resulting in the conception of multiple children with many different women. Relevant in this respect is that imprisoned males in Western countries conceive more children than do males on average, mirroring the phenomenon that in primitive hunter-gatherer societies the males with the most offspring – as confirmed by modern D.N.A. studies – are those who have made the greatest number of kills in tribal warfare.

Uncivilized breeders who can’t cooperate to literally save their lives, sound like any type of selection we know?

Don’t hate me cos you ain’t me.
“We feel more stress, but we cope better. This explains how we put up with stupid men.”

It’s useful to define a thing by NOT, in computing as in people.

It’s logical that if they didn’t hate, they couldn’t rape. It’s selected for, but let’s not go naturalistic fallacy and pretend a First World society can stand for it.

Intelligent people are capable of working with those they dislike without wanting to brain them and drag them back to the cave. Something about not being a monster.

The ‘trick’ to redpill is to accept things you don’t like because reality won’t change.

A Critical Review of Genius Famine’s Review

Because it’s been years since I read the book, (it actually came out in 2014-2015, moron) I’m going to ‘review’ (rip to shreds cruelly) this review. [tldr: Y’ALL NEED HBD, JESUS.]

5,000-ish words. Putting the shit into shitposting.

Because I can.

I feel I’ve lost YEARS off my life doing this, like the machine in Princess Bitchin’ Bride.

That’s its name now.

They’re bigging up Charlton because so many others (including yours truly) did first. Happy little lemmings of the online trend.
I’m happy for him and his co, Genius Famine is a solid 4-star book. It’s actually K-selection, that missing puzzle piece, a norm of religiosity is a part of it, not the other way around. Also, excess religion kills everyone. Massive hypothetical problems right there. MOVING TAYLOR SWIFTLY ON.

I need another yacht party, preserve me in Russian Standard.

WE NEED HARDER SCIENCES. It’s a little like porn, the soft stuff is never enough.
“intelligence is negatively correlated with genetic signs of high mutational load–such as an ‘asymmetrical’ (ugly) face”
I linked to that the other day lately, and I’m basically the ONLY person round these parts who calls it mutation load when the correct scientific nomenclature is ‘genetic load’. I thought mutation/al was more descriptive. I am one literary bitch. WHO is stealing my shit?
Naturally, the only solution to an unnatural, manmade boom is artificial eugenics. I digress. There isn’t even a bar cart in sight. It’s my inner alcoholic.
Charlton tries so sincerely to answer an HBD question with philosophy, applying religion to (a problem of) evobiology is one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard. My linking to his blog was intended as a supplement, not the substantive meal. For that, look up key HBD authors. If God himself came down on a fluffy cloud and zapped people with lightning bolts like a rock star Zeus, it still wouldn’t change the fact DNA exists and evolutionary genus have undergone speciation. If God created everything, why is any of his creation a bad thing to you? Where is your faith? Why wouldn’t He want us to understand all the incredible detail He threw into this video game? He’s got the whole world in his hands. So technically, God is cupping your balls. Respect Him.
The Industrial Revolution is fingered in A Troublesome Inheritance (uncited) but the evidence to support it is limited. Sharing the technology seems to have been the problem, the profit motive. Releasing certain technologies puts them in the hands of the low-IQ by default. This doesn’t end well, see the concepts of game theory and the arms race for further details.

There were actually two sexual revolutions before the one we know of the 1960s. Boomers are not the pivotal generation of history. The 60’s finale is the nail in the Western coffin with the Long March Through the Institutions, as the brilliant minds of the prior century finally died off.
1 – The Romantic Movement of the early 1800s. You’ve heard of it, Byron? Suddenly feelings were more important than facts and everyone realized what a special snowflake they were.
2 – The Belle Epoque and a little beforehand. The lifetime of Oscar Wilde fits it neatly. Again, the postwar generosity of K-types to struggling unfit societies in the name of God is the problem. Yes, I posit that Missions from God are demonic. When you consider everything they spawned to the outgroup is suffering – from the continued spread of leprosy, booming and starving populations, the rise of HIV, NGO child rape scandals and various tribal wars over scarce resources, the do-gooders of the 19th century killed it for the whole world of the 20th onward, who have had a dependent child in the guilt over the Third World it created ever since. Prove me wrong, internet. I know you can’t.

There’s an academic book, about 500 pages, called Pathological Altruism if you wanna know the mindset behind dumb white people who selfishly think the whole world should aspire to be Just Like Them. As if that’s possible or desirable. It’s written by a woman though, so I don’t expect it to make the same splash in this part of the internet, that constantly complains there aren’t enough women (while insulting and ignoring our contributions, bc thinking tits are terrifying).

HBD answers the concerns about inter-class fertility/fecundity, because class is rather constant based on your genome down the centuries. As in, social mobility has its limits. You can look all this stuff up in your own sweet time, you are literally online to be reading this, you’ve got no excuse.
This is forbidden science because it is predictive. The current paradigm of equalism is not.
The factors mentioned in this article precisely fit into other topics.

Family size – time preference, present and historical age at marriage, cultural expectations, national wealth and debt. Therefore, you’d expect Western(er) fertility will NEVER rise until national debt is removed as a dysgenic pressure. Not one of you wankers boo-hooing over the future has mentioned this. Clarey got close.

Not as random as it sounds.
I say Westerner because Magic Dirt isn’t real and we don’t want to bring up fertility in the West using non-Westerners, who have their own homeland to despoil. People are not interchangeable cogs, personality is genetically heritable too! You can’t build high-trust healthy societies with people who prefer to marry their child cousins and rig elections.
Luther, while based AF, not so much, on these topics.

The word dysgenic isn’t used in these conversations either. Atheism may be dyscivic but agnosticism is a human right. The Pope hates this.
Personality metrics are as important as IQ. Plenty of the world’s leaders are above-average IQ, they know what they are doing. These are the Fifth Column.
By chance alone, they couldn’t keep doing exactly the wrong thing for the People.
There are many myths about Christian fertility. If you breed beyond your ability to provide, another tenet of the religion, then all the children and the entire family die. This happens quickly or slowly, with reduced prosperity and poor marital prospects in times of K-selection, that either cause no marriage to occur, sub-standard fertility in the non-assortative pair match, excess labour and no creative production (bad for epigenetics) and/or mutation accumulation. Time preference correlates to industriousness and what we now call grit but is essentially prudence.
It’s tempting to claim Idiocracy! because listing pop culture in place of papers is part of the dumbing down you so despise but first you must understand what an Idiocracy is = r-selection.
The K-shift we are undergoing is a prelude to the Malthusian contraction of population better known as the Malthusian trap. Think the big toothy metal things in cartoons.
You cannot describe demographic patterns without the Malthusian trap.

Nobody cites the meme “demographics is destiny” when that’s obviously the topic too. If you’re trying to make the complex easy to remember for simple readers. I just use GIFs to break up the text. Evidence of too much thinking intimidates them, y’see.

Get with the clickbait times, grandpa

The best argument I have seen on the spread of upper-class genes by the death of the lower orders was the spread of Black Death. This happened in bursts that appear to correspond to social and cultural leaps. It also targeted the urban leeches.
It is not a coincidence.
The strangest regressive trend is the spread of STDs, which are not purely r-selected, since the species must reproduce in K-types too and spouses do cheat. In the era of premarital sex, they may have brought the infertility or birth-defect causing pathogens (by mutating development) into the marriage itself. Religion happens to prevent these problems e.g. no prostitution, keep celibate, it doesn’t answer them. The strongest candidate for a shift after Black Death is the probable damage caused by Syphilis. I noticed this but I haven’t found anyone to explicitly study it.
There is also the matter of atheist scientist superhero. It’s a myth of scientism. There is social pressure. Anonymously, plenty of scientists identify as non-atheist, something else. The atheism probability exists on a bell curve of one to two standard deviations; beyond this, belief in the supernatural and faith in bizarre, paranoid delusions also increases greatly.
That’s why they tend to go a bit ..loopy at the end. Especially the mathlete Olympiads.

There’s a shocking lack of historical (OLD, dusty-ass) case studies (Freud did this! If Freud can do this!…) and historical or cultural asterisks on the (largely but hardly acknowledged personality) theories of Genius Famine, but the bare bones is correct.

Here’s where I go off on one.

“The emancipation of women only worsened this fall in IQ, argue Dutton and Charlton.”

There is no evidence and quite the opposite, as child IQ conforms highly to maternal IQ and there is growing evidence about the benefits of delaying motherhood, at least until after the teenage years, once the body has stabilized and ceased to grow. Men traditionally delayed fatherhood too but don’t expect parity in discussion because questioning your priors is so sissy apparently.
The suffrage was universal, as the most cursory reading of history will confirm. Women could actually vote in many places before it anyway. ‘Women’s suffrage’ is a feminist myth.
I’ve covered this and so have others, in extensive detail. Modern young woman is more conservative than the average young man and in Charlton’s own country, women now vote more conservatively than men. This is a mathematical trend you can take to the sperm bank. Calm down.

Fridge horror. Did nobody bother to look this all up?
Where is the intellectual curiosity in intellectuals these days?
You don’t just get to proclaim an opinion because of your name or its letters, or else we’d take Lena Dunham’s advice on the biology of abortion. This is called an appeal to authority, emotional children.


It’s also another reason I go anon. I don’t want to get attacked IRL for stating basic truths any asshole could point out with five minutes and an internet connection. You are already in the place you need to be, I’m crudely drawing a map.

“They have far fewer children than less intelligent women, who are more likely to become pregnant young and by accident”

That is a failing of the Sexual Revolution, availability and attitudes to contraception, the abandonment of fathers and all those things combined that caused the monolithic rise of the modern welfare state. These are the true culprits of the issue, not voting. Most socialists are men, for example. Cthulhu swims Left. The voting is splintered far more by race than it ever could be by sex, and not one of them has the stones to finger ‘race’ as an issue. Try studying Voting Behaviour 101. See the recent election of Trump, where white women mostly voted for him and hardly any non-white. It’s a racial composition matter.
On a finer note, I’ve yet to see a modern civilization that isn’t white in root or base. I don’t see civilization as a bad thing either, it depends what you consider Peak, a question the NRx keep bitch-slapping over, especially in the Catholic blogs, that I feel Brucey would enjoy.
It is also strange to note that they deny intelligent women exist – until it’s tempting to criticize us for our responsible breeding habits.[But if we’re irresponsible, we’re also evil single mothers? Because all conception is intentional, right? And the father will definitely marry them, huh? And finding a spouse is so easy for anyone, m/f, not-dumb? And they have magical solutions for all these conflicts of the postmodern with the biological? Without actually going into the biology of it? ] Intelligent women breed far more often than intelligent men, if you look historically. They do not. There is no comparison of the sexes upon which to make these snide remarks. They fixate on one half of a whole problem. Blame Women! as your standby is literally sexist (and stupid, these are societal issues). As would be Blame Men! be sexist, and stupid for similar, anti-natal reasons. I proffer Blame R-types, since they are exactly the problem here. It doesn’t stroke the ego but it settles the mind.

Women discuss family problems far more than men, you just don’t look for us.
Family politics is literally our domain, the home.
You don’t get to pretend this is your area. It shows. Low EQ and SQ.
Men crowd around a table and discuss money, women discuss socially.
Maybe ask mumsnet how easy raising babies is today?
IF so, why no more stay-at-home dads and let her do the ‘hard work’?

The looming factor post-IR isn’t mentioned once. The world wars were incredibly dysgenic.
The healthy and young and brave died. The cowards and feeble and corrupt remained safe and plump and sexed at home, to later provide for their children (Parental Investment Theory) and give them an advantage over war widows (the reason for our welfare state).
Draft limitations are a problem not one man has the courage to mention.

You spared the genetic detritus. Darwin is laughing at you.
Might I impose that this selective blindness is an arrogant bias, on part of a sex who wishes fully to blame the Other?
Where geniuses do breed, they do not mention the potential for dead-end mutations e.g. Goethe’s children.
I suppose they mustn’t know? That’s encouraging.

Not to mention the female germline is more stable. The male is prone to mutations, because it’s constantly regenerating. So any problems with homosexuality, for instance… yeah, that isn’t on women. Infertility in men is literally measured by their mutations. Little X-men swimmers. The superpower is schizophrenia.

The American Model of collegiate academia killed the Medieval University of Europe. Chief among the concerns is tenure. There is no sound reason for tenure, a form of academic welfare. Naturally, I expect too much for academics still in the Matrix-like system to admit this. Universities have too much money and hence waste their time. It’s affluenza on the level of an organisation. I do not expect that idea to be popular, but it is the truth. If Harvard couldn’t be left money in donations and wills, would it be so arrogant? Would the conceit spread to its founders? Why is the state teat extended to these people? They have become like the modern church, with the same problems e.g. tax exemption. The Bible says ya gotta pay taxes. The Vatican gets around this by being the State. Again, I don’t expect these problems to magically wax into focus given the bias of the writers, I have to mention it.

And someone’s going to act like it can afford to go unsaid.

“Academics contribute to this by getting funding, publishing frequently, and attending conferences.”
The social scene is poison. There, I said it. It’s populated by the midwits Vox Day complains about. They think they’re clever because they all mutually agree. Aren’t they lovely? Good in front of a camera, bad thinkers.

It is a little sexist to call the model of fault Head Girl when her role is often second to Head Boy and anyone British knows what a massive kiss-up the Head Boys are. Most of the leading academia they complain of is still generally male, so I wonder how they can square that circle…

The obedience of school is the Prussian model. It’s based on the male military complex. Before that, the rote form to teach monks. ..Were they girly too?
Boys’ schools do not magically produce geniuses on par with Tesla. Women and femininity are not the problem and assuredly not a weakness. This is a cheap, trivial argument. The problem is sub-par management, which, if you look at politics too, is decidedly male. Is the masculinity a problem? No. Gender has nothing to do with it. The people running the show are simply incompetent, due to generations of suck-ups getting promoted, largely thanks to credentialism.
I fear they may be a little intimidated by the findings that girls’ scores have exceeded boys’. Well, if we stopped grading on a curve, used a mixture of testing metrics (papers and exam because there are problems with both), in an anonymous exam condition it’s the same paper, either you know your stuff or you don’t. If we stopped grading on a curve, male grades would slip further down because they don’t care, they’re kept in education beyond vocation age (13-14). Girls are more receptive to any instruction, including education. Blame the white matter, learning is a social experience. Maybe in one-on-one tutor setups boys would do better, but good luck getting state funding for that!
Also, why do grades need to be an intersex competition? Curriculums have always been crap, you’re meant to go beyond it.
“This person will be excellent at playing the academic game and will make a great colleague. But they won’t innovate; won’t rock the boat.”
The problem there is a culture called collectivism, it is the opposite of Western individualism and dampens creativity. Snuffs it, kills it dead. It’s prevalent in Asia, not female-only spaces. You also cite a personality trait called agreeableness and another, conscientiousness. Personality types are not wrong per se, they have a place. Bad academics were hired there by other bad academics who slipped through the old net and now academia is bad. Where is the XX in this, specifically? There were all-good female colleges and still are, same with boys’. Don’t grasp for simplistic bullshit.
If you knew as many stories about Catholic boarding schools as I do, you’d know godly obedience is not the norm. Have you heard of St Trinians? If anything, the veil of religion is an excuse to misbehave, because you can just go out on Saturday and confess to a priest on Sunday and it’s all fine with The Big G by Monday.
Naturally, I don’t expect two men to know this. However, it’s their job to check.
Part of the rationale of mixed sex schools was to reduce rebellion caused by sexual frustration, by channeling it socially. It has been moderately successful, except class sizes present a new issue.
The above incompetent management issue applies to religious schools for boys as well, that also have rampant abuse (fagging), pedophilia and homosexual problems... don’t ask the ‘hard’ questions though, guys. Very manly.

“Once upon a time, they note, a ‘country vicar’ had lots of free time to research” –botany, no
You can’t build a quantum tunnel in the average English garden. Stop it. Citizen science is dead barring medical trial subjects.
Ironically, those botanical studies led to the theory of evolution. It is strange to read a man who clearly doesn’t believe in evolution, make references to biology that stands on it.
There were also scientific nuns. They do not get a look-in (ever) although they meet the criteria of being both heavily religious and scientific….
Moreover, the search for Adam and Eve led to fossil studies. It’s almost like you can’t suppress epistemic truth and this upsets idiots.

“The genius has no institution to nurture him and his potential will not be fulfilled.”
He has never needed one, he needs a shed.
Scholarly pursuits didn’t begin in the Middle Ages!

Let’s wrap this up a little.

The problems are thrice:
1. if everyone is equal, nobody is special and there’s no such thing as genius. We don’t need to worry about it or nurture it because we must deal with the dullards and dunces, who need us the most, say the low-IQ themselves, who want to feel superior to someone.
2. if geniuses can’t get credit and funding, they can’t do anything. Duh. Science has a price tag.
3. if geniuses somehow happen to succeed, society looks for any way to tear them down out of envy, from claims about mental illness (currently, autism) to political reasons or simply Tall Poppy Syndrome.


“But we have reached a point where our lives are so secure, and where death is so remote, that we no longer believe that our lives, or our society, has eternal significance.”
All Cultures Are Equal lies. PC censorship, yes, we know about.
Punishment of in-group preference.
I mean, these concepts aren’t hard to research.
Most exist on wikipedia, for beginners.
“Western society is selfish; the human race is damaging the Earth.”
Those are two separate points. Europe is the only continent below replacement level.
We are the only sustainable continent. No conversation on sustainability can be had until we address population. The Left thinks it owns the environment as a topic, but they’re really retaining ground so we cannot discuss this in the mainstream, public spheres (denying a platform?)…
“In addition, our high level of comfort means that the problems with which a genius may now grapple are either too theoretical to care about or too long-term to think about now.”
“He will cause offence and question the dogmas which give us the comfort of certainty all for the sake of a problem so distant that most of us can postpone thinking about it.”
Lie. I’m sick of these sweeping statements that pretend to be scientific. You get some jumped-up upper-middle class white prick who thinks he’s the next Hitchens because he ‘cares’ about XYZ topic (right-wing virtue signalling). Hitchens read books before mouthing off. For many years. Go back to reddit if you want delusions of grandeur.
“In this context, of life not being serious, we would expect the genius to be pilloried.”
How is life less serious now for anyone paying attention? Literally how? Where is my surfboard to coast?
It’s more serious and seriously depressing than ever!
Sweeping statements!
Geniuses are not insulted, they are denied. They are disqualified so as to be ignored! The findings may as well not have happened!
The cultural message is Noblesse Oblige is dead. We don’t need you, we haz iPhones.
Unmentioned goes the fact that most illustrious scientists were members of the aristocracy. I guess Neoreaction slices a little too close to the nerves!

Academia just replicates the environment of aristocracy – badly.
Look up the story of ‘snob’.

“And geniuses are more sensitive than most.”
In themselves, yes. Externally? Have you read the stories about Newton? He was a Grade A pillock socially, a total misanthrope who neither cared about nor sought approval. It was awesome.
He was worse than House. #herogoals
But I suppose the author wants to self-identify (Hello, Millennial) with Illustrious Status Group by the convenient emotions of existence. Why? If what you’ve written in that very paragraph is true, you’d be signalling anything you could that you were anything BUT a genius, if they’re so openly reviled!
Common sense, there is not.

“Life will become harsher and simpler and, eventually, more religious.”
This is already happening with economics and I linked to Jaymans exemplary coverage of liberal fertility being a feature, not a bug.
They tend to assume all religion is good for science though, when clearly it’s just the one (Protestantism) that allows it.
Not one big Mormon scientist, is there? Catholicism literally killed people for doing maths during the Renaissance. We could be living on other planets and piloting flying cars by now if the Pope weren’t a thing (and nothing in scripture says we need one). The Bible actually says to beware of false prophets who try to replace scripture and that God wants his followers to be happy and prosperous. That would be an easier sell, huh? Human rights aren’t really negotiable if you want someone’s labour so persuasion is the trick.
“At the moment, it seems that there’s nothing we can do to stop this short of a horrendous reversion to pre-Industrial levels of child mortality.”
We won’t stop magically knowing how child-rearing has evolved, this kind of knowledge isn’t academic. It’s preserved in the matrilineal line. This is obvious.
No blackpills unless they’re real.

“But if we could better nurture genius then somebody might come up with a solution before it is too late.”
Almost sounds like the entire point of eugenics. And do you want historical reversion or progress? Biblical living standards or First World ones? Decide. Pick one.
Also, way to pass the fucking buck. You want it? You do it, prick.

These people say they’re So Smart (complete with IQ claims) …but not smart enough to get off their arse and actually do something.

Sure thing, kid. And they call us damsels.

Your armchair philosophy is gonna Save Da World.

Adults in the room, inwardly:

Why should a Feynman work for you?… There is no sane answer to this question. Rand’s stake of a point in the heart of greedy vampire societies that don’t appreciate the people who make it so good. Marx said who do you work for? Rand says WHY.
God-damn the entitlement of normies to the hard-earned property of the intellectual.
Fruits of one’s labour, a human right. Read your philosophy, child. Sowing, reaping…

It justifies the homesteading and other stuff you advocate when civilization ‘dies?’ If tribes in the middle of nowhere can acknowledge this, the higher IQ should be able to wrap our heads around.
Anything less is slavery. It’s a theft of one’s LIFE-TIME.

It is evil. Bible says a man who will not work, should not eat.

Aaron Clarey has actually covered this, there is no greed, there is only theft. It’s well-known in economics that anything less than a choice is force. That’s left-wing, isn’t it? All working [no leisure, no robots] … according to his abilities…[like you can work above them?] in a kind of commune [rejects family]… that contains everyone [supranationalism, no borders, open borders]… for universalism, a value. [we call this multiculturalism, still]
A little on the theft and self-ownership angle. This isn’t egalitarianism in the modern variation that doesn’t work, it’s from humanism, originally.

At most, they the producer get to choose to limit it to potential consumers as they see fit – exclusive to themselves, genetic kin…not everyone. This is Polyanna stupidity, Bill Gates has kept most of his fortune and he’s meant to be the nice one. As stated above, taking things from geniuses is part of the Problem TM. No regulation, no oversight, no Nanny State. Control is part of the ownership conditions. I don’t get to decide to sell your house. They got to that point, you didn’t – they earned the right to tell you to fuck off and build your own spaceship.

Pearls of wisdom are not for the herd of swine. Nope.

“The genius will combine this very narrow intelligence with very narrow interests.”
Hahahahahaha, you’ve never met one, have you?
They take time to decide on topics and between those, they rove. See von Neumann.
Don’t believe the Hollywood trope of a man in slacks sitting in front of a blackboard screaming WHYYYYYY? at the air (or God?) and throwing balled-up pieces of paper at his coworkers who JUST. DON’T. UNDERSTAND. Like that’s *their* problem. The tortured genius is trite and over-used as a metaphor for teenage angst.


“He’ll also be socially awkward and eccentric.”
Define this. Everyone is a weirdo once you get to know them for a few years.
Do you mean autism?
Rain Man wasn’t autistic.

Priors. Whatever fancy fucking name you want. If it makes you feel clever, delta/gamma-tier.

I proceed, insulting nobody in particular.

“They tend to be useless at everyday things”
I knew. I just kneeeew the digs would come in eventually. Point three.
Do you mean all of these people are savants?
And you don’t technically need to be autistic to have savant or splinter skills.

Do they look this up?

*whispers* NO.



If you actually want a society led by people better than you (some kind of aristocracy cmon), to care and take care of you, then don’t play into the enemy’s mind games.

“they are very fragile people and they are not usually interested in money”
Are they children? Can they not develop? Well, if you’re basing that last on the tenured….
“They need long-term security so that they do not have to worry about ordinary things, which they not interested in and are no good at.”
I feel basing this on mathematical niche SWPL men of the 20th century America is a method flaw.
Einstein is not the prototypic genius. Read more.
He became famous as a meme. The tongue meme. You know the one.

“If we can make these changes, insist Dutton and Charlton, then in spite of declining intelligence, it is possible that a genius may be produced who can develop a solution to this problem”

And I must scream.
What problem.
Define the problem.
Use your four operational brain cells.
IF no geniuses = problem, how can we sprout one like a magic beanstalk of N-IQ?
IF intelligence is declining, surely plug the leak in the boat before you begin to bail?
IF there are geniuses, give them the media platform. Give them power. The media platform is the biggest problem because it encourages the stupid. Stop the comedies and MTV reality shit, even the ones you like you must give up America. It’s like taking a dummy from a baby, for much the same reasons.
IF academia is the problem, it isn’t geniuses then, is it? It’s the Cultural Marxist structure that is hostile to anyone that tells the truth.
IF someone had a solution, none of you would listen. That’s your own point, by the way!
Being lectured about degeneracy from a resident of New York.
The irony is five miles deep into Chomsky’s rectal cavity.

I quit this topic, for like… five months, until I’ve forgotten why I hate it again.

I already know the default reaction to this post, for example.

How shitposty do I have to be for you to listen to me? This is proof of what I mean, you complain everything spoonfeeds but then throw the rattle when someone dares break it down because it wasn’t how you’d do it. That’s the purpose of teaching, dumbass. You can’t yet. It wouldn’t work.

It isn’t personal, it’s societal. Not everything is about you.

Get new rhetorical strikes, please. Buy some. Get a GF pillow and a sense of humour too.
Next there’ll be a series of E-books on How to Save Western Civ and step one is grab the testes’ cream…
None of this will be glib, for we are truly the damned. How can you fix people who brag about being broken? How can you save what you can’t find? How can you cooperate with people who turn everything into a WWF match?

What does Marx have to do with China?

Thought experiment: What would Marx say?

Vague shitpost of the obvious incoming.

In an all-white society, he was right to fixate on class because race wasn’t a factor.
Still, race has become too burdensome as a factor, people forget class. The Left aren’t wrong to bring it up, merely to blame it for everything. Class isn’t even blank slate, that’s just the way economists lie about it to deny historic responsibility from their field. Bubbles aren’t natural, unless you mean the soap kind. They are man-made – by crooks.
Marx was right that the middle class have to die. What he missed is that middle-class ideas have to die. That would swiftly solve the problem of the chattering class.
There’s no middle-class without a separate identity to carve, an axe to grind, an other to oppress or uplift, in an appeasement display to prevent their own demise or consolidate their position against same-race competition.
The superpower is in the production. During the British Empire, the factories were here, since the Industrial Revolution. Then America, and they had two profitable wars for the right people. Now, China runs the world. The Chinese aren’t being told to learn English, the West is being told to learn Mandarin. The Chinese have enslaved their own people to spread by immigration, to reach by financial influence and to conquer the West in the long-run. Outbreeding us also outweighs in terms of war. They can afford to lose a billion, we can’t lose a fifth of that without going extinct. The West ought to await Malthus with glee.
Mother Russia will always come up smelling of roses, you never mess with Mother Russia. The Chinese under-estimate the Russian, they don’t understand the psychology. It’s passive, it isn’t aggressive, and it settles very well.
Where are the factories? Where are the workers? Where are the means of production? You might say, They never won a war! But they won. They won something and something real. Further, the US never beat the British, not in real terms. Always one step forward, three back.
The USA has never won a war. Look how independence is going. Do you really think the mass immigration from Africa would’ve happened back then under British rule? Neither of those world wars were necessary.
China won the spoils of all that bloodshed with patience and cheap toys. I think it might be Christmas that killed the Christian. Perhaps the Puritans were right.
However, the consent of the Western worker is a fickle thing. The parasite load of the global economy is reaching tipping point thanks to demographic shifts. Really, it’s a tidal wave and you need to keep a weather eye on the horizon to know when to move. The gene pool is full of mud and antibiotic resistant disease.
Nations have been sold out for less short-term gain.
The financial systems rely on worker consent. Marx correctly pointed out that when they realize the game is up, there are no more gibs and no retirement…. what else is left but rebellion? Slaves rebel.
Statist reward incentives are parasitic on the very people who produce them. I won’t sit here grinding on an old wheel. Gen Y and Z will be fascinating to watch as this plays out. Brainwashed from nursery.
I wanted to point out these basic, salient arrangements.
It’s everybody’s problem.
This isn’t a white issue, but whites do appear to be the golden goose – at least in terms of charity ‘aid’.
I’ve said before, you can’t have white levels of prosperity with fewer white people in society.
Resources are contracting because population is expanding past the elastic.
It’s going to snap.
The sustainable nutjobs lose traction because they never discuss the eugenic need for population control. They do on any other species. By comparison, the UN pretends this will happen magically. Humans are a locust swarm on this planet, but not all humans. #NotAllHumans
The common sense necessity to acknowledge this is missing thanks to vice and corruption, the outcome. The academics expect gold-plated pensions. The politicians want to be voted back in. The economists want grants. The capitalists want fatter margins. The same finite resources divided between a sustainable, reduced population (commonly est. 1 billion, possibly up to 2) will result in instant prosperity. Marx believed that reducing the working-class was impossible, since the rich would suffer but- what if the poor don’t work? Marx is ridiculous for many reasons, but not so much as his followers who believe nothing has changed in almost a century and a half. When practically everything has changed and they also brag about this ‘progress’… cognitive dissonance is a brain cancer, kids.
For the poor to be better off, most of the population has to go. The majority isn’t Rich.
Squeezing the rich would only work a few years… they’d stop producing.
Demographics. Economics is an application, either correct or incorrect. Beyond demographics, there isn’t much to say. Economists are not social scientists*. They don’t care about people. They will screw people to get numbers. Economists would be run out of any medieval town, a saner time. They usually sell Get Rich(er) Quick – this is afforded by a broken currency system and fractional reserve leprechaun money.

There isn’t One solution. There are many. Like a jigsaw. Many problems.
Maybe something like 75% have a similar cause, but they don’t all have the same solution.
People don’t want to look because not only does it 1. suck to live through something you don’t deserve, but 2. the Problem is huge and 3. there are too many details to discuss solutions at this stage of decline. Where’s the will?

*Could we also stop asking engineers and physicists about social science problems? Their opinions are crap. Ask a 5yo.

Also, social scientists are not preachers. Their word isn’t gospel. Neither is a preachers, come to think.

What does Bill Nye, a children’s show presenter, know about how to bring down national debt?
What does Token Black Tyson know about humanities education?
What does ..actually, there aren’t any celebrity female scientists, are there?


A ‘final solution’ won’t fix the social system or the hegemonic cultural paradigm. Yes, you’re very edgy, please move and let the grown-ups talk.

Look at the food security of Asia if you want a blackpill LOL, especially the much-vaunted SE and China (our economic superior). It hasn’t occurred to a lot of  these ‘redpills’ that Asia has only been historically strong because the West is all-time weak. Superpowers are on a see-saw kind of setup.

I think Africa will invade Asia, personally, based on land bridges and farmland.

Aid workers are not saints, they are the devil in a halo.
History will view them as scum, vermin, who encouraged Mass rape, disease and famine.
All for the glory of their pride.

They knew this was coming. They simply don’t care. Look up the disaster of Millennium villages. They wanted their bribe money, free 4x4s, 5* hotels and plenty of brown children to rape.

Google ‘UN rape scandal’ sometime.

TFW not red-pill according to newbies

My feelings are so hurt I’m gonna start a Youtube AND a Patreon!

There are clearly some BS questions in there.

A few are simply out-of-place PUA/MRA/MGTOW shit.

If you don’t want to roll back the Sexual Revolution of the 60s, you can’t roll back to any prior time period, Einsteins.

Like assuming Universal Suffrage is female-only (look up the actual laws), and the Alpha Bro question with no basis in statistics (the provider breeds, the genetic father remaining – father is a verb – increases fitness according to all known results, to start it’s called the Parental Investment Hypothesis). A ‘psychologist’ should know these things…..

Nothing about HBD or civic nationalism, for instance. It’s more of an Alt-Lite PUA list. You can’t own a concept like redpill. Reddit tried that. This is No True Redpill, trying to outgroup the people with the facts, the people who made this more than a few memes during election season. I have a special helicopter waiting just for you, red carpet for the self-proclaimed Alpha that doesn’t ‘believe’ in evolution.
Blaming the wimminz is what weak men do. It divides the two halves necessary for reproduction, the true purpose of feminism. Not shekels, that ‘genocide’ thing you mentioned…


I’ve been using this tagline the best part of a decade so you can pry it from my cold dead fingers, you Tinder-loving gym fags. Not one traditionalist question or anything philosophical about how to structure a healthy society, so it’s all normie trying to signal edgy with zero productive ideas. Like critical theory for the right.


You can’t outgroup the original founders, you Roosh-cucking degenerates.

But at least they called me Hitler.


You won’t be a Party member of any Patriarchy without a family.

They’ll get bored when they realize the Alt Right won’t allow them to rest on their arses signalling on Twitter like an SJW. The AR is undergoing a purge of lightweights or else it’ll die and change form like a phoenix. You do have to get up and work for this, and give up all the deviance you’re addicted to. That’s the barrier to entry, not learning certain terms. If you refuse to marry, you don’t believe in marriage, you might as well be Milo. Your ‘sex life’ impresses no one.

But at least they called me Hitler, so you know I must be onto something.

Since when did autist mean factually correct?

Sluts on the morality of slutting:


The first was Henry VIII.

I love how they’re going the way of NRx and trying to claim ‘official’ beliefs, like a doctrine of a religion. You don’t get to exclude people. You have no moral authority. You’re not running this show. Your MSM-baiting ‘gatherings’ involve the e-celeb cancer thinking it’s important. You’re as bad as Laci Green, you just come from the opposite claim, totally passively reacting to whatever the Left says, standing for nothing yourselves. Just anti-, opposing, spite.
Way to bury any ideology, formalize. Next these losers will get matching homoerotic hoodies to go with their Man-Gorilla book. What’s the size of a gorilla’s dick again? Tiny.

The people writing this shit are genetic suicides and atheists, their opinion is liberal trash.
Commie by behaviour. Look at dem birth rates… wait, that’s abortion from your ‘notches’. Proud papa. They were libertarian gamer trash porn addicts before Gamergate.

Meanwhile, you know they’re a degenerate slut trying to explain away all the party years (ongoing) by insulting people who score highly too. They’re still living it up in the Pussy Parade and expect an obedient wife to take on their STDs and cheating risk once they start losing more hair and getting fat.

R-types are defined by their selfish entitlement.
However, we know they’re incapable of monogamy so the joke’s on anyone dumb enough to ring it.

Still, better than 8values.