Comic: European identity and multiculturalism replacement

my edit, riff off it and use elsewhere, it’s the far Left’s original attempt to meme on this issue, pre-internet

It’s been a while since I’ve taken the piss out of Captain Euro and it’s high time more people knew about him. The overt rip-off of the early 90s Action Man cartoon style. Read a few of the comics, read his Twitter (@captaineuro) it’s total cringe. They’re meant to be politically neutral. How is he not a re-appropriated meme for the Alt Right yet? He’s like Superman, a classic white male protagonist hero. Comics are sold to schools.

Funny how they use the image of Ubermensch strength, in this and Commie propaganda, while denying hierarchy and liberty that leads to it. The SJWs should start a petition calling for Captain Euro to be replaced by an African Muslim lesbian. It’s been three decades.

BTW the Eurokorps already exist, for all this talk of a federal European army.

Cropped version for stealing

How’s that for a ‘conversation’ starter?

Empire and economics (inflation, deflation, hyper)

Speculative but educated post. I wrote this a few days ago but took those off out of respect.
It goes from professional to shitpost-territory. A lot of known-knowns you’re supposed to pretend not to know.

8,000 words, most of them shit-tier.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/inflation-or-deflation-debate-continues.html

“A key issue in this debate is that not all debt is created equal, while a parent often absolves a loan to their child the bank seldom forgives a loan on an automobile. Sometimes like in the reality game show Survivor it comes down to who is left standing. I contend winning does not always come down to who is the best, strongest, or smartest, but that luck and many other factors also come into play in how things unfold. For example, imagine two widget factories on the hill outside of town and both with the same pricing and quality product but financially weak, if a storm knocks out production at one factory resulting in its closing the other would benefit from inheriting its customers and maybe even able to raise prices. This comes down to the idea of old fashion supply and demand. This revolves around the supply of money just as much as it does to the supply of the commodity it is being used to purchase. We are often forced to question the formulas used to compute inflation.”

On hyperinflation risk;

“I continue to contend the primary reason that inflation has not raised its ugly head or become a major economic issue is because we are pouring such a large percentage of wealth into intangible products or goods. This includes currencies. If faith drops in these intangible “promises” which is the base of our financial system and money would suddenly flow into tangible goods seeking a safe haven inflation would soar. This theory will be explored more in part 2 of this three-part series.”

Hm.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/coming-economic-end-game-may-be-more.html

“Following this and I do mean following as by “several” months, central banks will be forced to unleash such a massive amount of new currency into the system to combat the scourge of deflation that it will stagger the mind. This will in effect clear the deck of deadwood through hyperinflation and pave the way forward to introduce a new or a “batch of new” currencies.”

I don’t think we’ll trust the old money-lenders with a new currency. There’d be no faith without a change in leadership and I mean total.

The debts that are not written off will become a moot point in that most will be devalued and paid off in worthless paper. The important issue will not be fairness but how to get from here to there with the least damage to the institutions and wealth those in power seek to protect. Sooner or later all great Ponzi schemes must come to an end.”

Student loans are bullshit, exhibit A. You can’t tax labour that hasn’t happened.

You can expect promises to be rewritten and broken. Rules will change as we go through the wash. Most people will see their assets rinsed away as society is put through the wringer. For example, expect the cost of living adjustment on social security to be modified reducing payments to the elderly. Adding to the woes of retirees is that many pensions will be forced to reduce payouts and break promises as the returns on their investment fail to meet expectations. Many of the guarantees and paper promises granted over the past decades will prove to be less valuable than the paper they are printed on.”

Pensions were immoral anyway, fuck the people who never bothered to save.
You can’t promise someone else’s money, especially in the future, that may never manifest (Rise of the NEETs).
The pensioners wish to tax the blood and tears of the young, if work’s so good for everyone, they can join in.
Real estate will drop like a stone in the ocean, it was puffed up by foreign investment from dodgy governments but without anyone willing to purchase at (their) prices, the move to cashless will try and curtail any black market bartering. We’re already living under Junk Food Prohibition to anesthetize us.
There is no such thing as a blue chip. All stocks are equally worthless without workers. Marx didn’t account for the stock market but it requires cooperative workers and a stable currency. Cue laugh track.
I dislike this gloomy tone but there’s no way around it. The loss of personal savings by citizens is the tragedy, shitty
investments in the property bubble deserve to die, you have an obligation to maintain property the same way as a classic car.
At least cars are valuable by brand and model, the location of your home is dependent on local demographics so it’s no wonder immigration is an *issue* to those with large holdings wanting to preserve their ill-gotten gains and continue to squeeze the youth like we won’t snap at some point. The low-IQ imports may be violent but otherwise not a threat, it’s the people who placed us in this situation for greed that must be dealt with in the French way.
Generation Rent doesn’t just apply to houses – we stream, we eat out and we’re raised on convenience. When all that supply chain goes away, a lot of former Communist Guardian readers will become capitalist without their coffee fix. If you count latte as coffee.
Of particular note will be the starvation of the public sector, as it deserves via unfunded liabilities (i.e. grand theft stato). The Unions will attempt to demand value that doesn’t exist at the same time the gibs are spoiling and rioting for their soma of shitty tech and shittier food.

“Many of the guarantees and paper promises granted over the past decades will prove to be less valuable than the paper they are printed on.”

As a child, I was told never to trust an IOU because you never know what will happen to the person writing it and neither do they.

“As pawns in this game, we can either choose to sacrifice ourselves or fight. In this case fighting means to undertake a strategy that protects what we can of the life we have created within the power we have been granted. The fact you are reading and thinking about this subject puts you in a far better position than the masses who see before them blue skies and unicorns grazing upon a hill.”

The fatted calf who thinks it’s going on a pleasant walk.

“Make no mistake, we cannot and should not look for a white knight to come riding in to save the day, no such leader exists to lead us out of the economy hell we have created.”

Yes, no such person exists, except the rebuilding effort after the expulsions. Deporting the traitors is more important than the invaders and this way they ruin whichever country they land in. You shouldn’t want to save this system unless you’re one of them.
The normalcy bias and expectations of Economic Jesus ready to forgive all our fiscal sins is keeping it ticking over.

“hard assets need to be in your possession and hidden away.”

TP and painkillers, got it.

http://brucewilds.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/empires-often-collapse-from-cancer.html

The problem appears to be usury. It’s really economic slavery. Babies can’t sign contracts and give consent, however much you want to financially circumcise them of a liberty-filled future.

“We need a good war” – yes, but not the kind that costs money.
The democratic comes first, then the civil.
A money war is what all elites want and spoil for the head of the supply queue like fat pigs.
Their children have two passports and a private jet, they won’t enter military service.
Anyone with a second passport cannot be considered loyal to their country.
I think a lot of the young are going into credit card debt for necessities or because they believe it’ll be written off once
the companies go under. Self-sabotage, sabotages the system.
The middle-class and middle-aged will pay with their assets, as they deserve.
In this system, it pays to have a lot or almost nothing.
Lower Boomers and Upper Gen X are fucked.

from counter signal memes

It isn’t the 1% or the .1%.
It’s the 20% or so (uppermost tax bracket, The Rich) supporting them.
Chop down the supports, usually in investment banking and they fall too.
“the massive government that promised so much.”

If you believe in a free lunch you deserve to wash dishes.

“Corruption and crony capitalism are cancers on society that continue to grow if not constantly addressed with harsh
measures.”
Who are these cronies? Why not begin a list?
You know, for when the bill comes.
“The whole concept of economic growth is based on an ever growing trend of year over year increased production.”
Modernism.
One line beforehand:
“the question remains as to when and what the new rules will be.” Traditionalism. Localism.
That these people are blind to that option show it is the way it must go.
“By removing the incentive for people to save and encouraging risk we have eroded the quality of economic growth.”
And people.
This will be a hard reset selecting for character. The question is what character.
“in short, we have to move forward faster in each coming year just to keep growing.”
Carlin’s Circling the Drain
“All this underlines that we are living in “interesting times” while playing havoc with the value of things and what they are worth”
Speak for China.

Patriotism for which country, is the political question? Which principles governing which country and which policies from which time periods? That is all the NRx, Alt Right and other traditionalist groups are discussing.
The Fall of the Empire is a given, but how do we replace it without losing our living standard?
Who wants to go Amish or Sharia?

comment
“Do you supposed that America is cursed for not praising God in spirit and truth anymore, but rather in vain?”
You must abandon God before God abandons you. You don’t notice this…until you know it.
America became the nexus of decadence, rewarding degenerate citizens. They deserve to collapse.

Demographics is the science economics wishes it could be.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/why-world-economy-likely-collapse-1-simple-chart
I once read a theory that humans do sense impending disasters like other animals.
However, this is reflected in our breeding habits, because we don’t want to lower overall family fitness and lose everyone by increasing strain with a baby’s constant needs. In a war, the crying also makes you hard to miss. I never forgot it and I think there is something to it. Even Guardianista are delaying childbearing because of a deep, gut feeling it’s a bad idea right now. Babies make you easier to enslave because you can be threatened and protecting them places the mothers out in the open or other dangerous positions. Especially if the family is on welfare or otherwise incapable of feeding itself, the hosts will all die. Those adopting foreign babies are playing both sides – whoever wins, they do.
It is no coincidence 65IQ Muslims breed like rabbits in Europe – they plan on many of them dying.
As long as the West contains pre-war native levels, we are fine. Baby Boomers are surplus to requirement. We can rebuild along Empire lines with Empire numbers. There is greater IQ DENSITY per individual, nobody other than the West has this advantage, so sub-replacement isn’t as terminal for us as it would be for other races. This assumes good operations, healthy society.
Part of the reason so many Indian and Arab men are coming here – they sense good pickings of women.
Whether we’re game or not.
They underestimate the ancient spirit, even of the women. Whites have been in slumber a long time. Like an angry bear in a cave stirring. The Boomers didn’t have enough kids, another pressure onto the heap of burning grievance. To do what a brood used to. When the middle-class Marxists realize Marx was a parasite and there’s no free food unless they’re the ones producing it – oh, the sea change will be a tidal wave. Students turning on the lying teachers who burdened them with debt for the privilege.
“These trends are about to get much worse, from an economic and consumption standpoint.”
Civilized peoples aren’t supposed to keep reproducing this much, nukes have made typical war corrections redundant.
A compact society of high-IQ and high-skilled is most flexible to political and long-term social change.
Europe is the most compact for our quality.
We can even drop to Industrial Revolution levels or possibly agrarian before that.
What about India? China? Can you picture Dubai without trucks of water and expensive lipsticks for the whores?
MENA will experience Full Malthus. The r-types sense this and try to flee, but they are the first wave of locusts, ironically they trigger the events. Do you really think the mixed race will remain here when times get tough? They’ll flee where resources are cheap – real home i.e. Pakistan, Afghanistan, India etc. Rats swim as the ship sinks, they don’t wait around.
They know the natives will want a return on their civic investment but they’ll soon discover their charity needs to be
recouped somehow.
“All the interest rate cuts and debt has been undertaken under the paradigm that it would be more easily repaid in the future…but now we’ve come to “the future” where there are fewer of us to service the debt, buy homes, buy cars, consume our way to prosperity…or pay the taxes to keep the social systems solvent.”
In the post-war period – they had one job. Fuck enough to make plenty of kids.
They failed and that’s why evolution says they deserve to starve to death. Not the young they robbed of the same youth they enjoyed at the expense of the blood of their own elders. They are grasshoppers without a fiddle and winter is coming.

speaking of, wasn’t this one of mine prescient?

“Absent a growing population of young to buy their assets (IRA’s, homes, etc.), we have a small problem (central bank asset purchases to the rescue).”
Ponzis collapse spectacularly. Billionaires won’t buy in the suburbs.

#NOBAILOUTSFORBOOMERS

“The implications economically, financially, societally, etc. etc. of a collapsing population of young and soaring older
population should be ringing alarm bells…but instead our politicians seem officially mindless (or intentionally misleading the populace) in the face of a cataclysmic shift.”
They’re fucking vampires and a stake should be driven through their black hearts for selling us into slavery for a few tacky holidays and wife-swapping fuckparties. They even want our blood’s proteins to stay youthful and fuck us over longer. We’d be farmed if they could, they’re sociopaths.
The elderly of our time are (in general) deserving of DIS-respect.

Here it gets juicy.

comment
“Someone should do something about those goddam africans….”
Just wall the whole continent off and let them either kill another or evolve. Leave them a hundred or two years.
Technology won’t save you, as libertarians are discovering.
We don’t have food, but we have 3D printers!
Nobody mentions food security.
We have become feeders, suppliers of the Third World. When the tax money stops filtering to the evil NGO complex, they’ll come find us to collect the caloric jizzya.
“That’s why they are called Jungle bunnies, they breed like rabbits.”
“The sooner it collapses the better for us young people. I want time to rebuild a little wealth after the previous
generations’ combined fuck up ruins everything before im too old to do anything useful”
The question becomes, what can’t they steal like Cyprus?
Franklin said to empty your purse into your head and then no man could take it.
Wise advice.
As for who dies first, the fatties.
The Government knows this and is hastening the process. How?
They know the book Nudge.
EITHER they lose the fat and become more productive, costing less too OR they let reaction formation kick in and eat themselves to death, also saving the state money.
I feel like the only person seeing this.
“Planned obsolescence has meant ‘consumption’ is at artificially high levels to begin with IMO.”
This includes people.
Tell me, which races have the greatest tendency to fat-store?
It isn’t the whitey, is it?
“Meantime the main problem is where to live. Most white people are still asleep, and you don’t want to live near them because they tend to get upset when their eyes are open.”

There is nowhere to run. New Zealand is now getting problems. White Flight is finished.

On feminism:
“Human fecundity is inversely proportional to female literacy rates. Compulsory education is killing us.”
reply “Yeah, once the wimmin learned blowjobs and masturbation in school it was all over for civilization.”
Mentioned only yesterday (as of writing), it isn’t a reproduction problem, and from all this it isn’t a problem. It’s preparation. The reproduction problem was a marriage problem. You should ban sexual entitlement. There is only the exclusive conjugal right.
Allowing people to spill their seed all over the place means they don’t reproduce, they take measures against it.
“Yes the obvious solution of too much government is to get government more involved in everyone’s lives, forcibly sterilizing people. We’ve had TOO MUCH freedom, see? It’s not that government and politicians made promises they can’t keep.”
It’s already dysgenic except for abortion and euthanasia.
Why not full eugenic?
“Just get rid of sec 8 and foodstamps. You’re on your own. It can’t happen all at once, but we need to slowly transition that way. These people with no skills should be out working farms in rural areas anyway because we shouldn’t be shipping food 1000s of miles around the globe before it gets to us. They never should have been herded into the cities in the first place. And if you don’t like your station in life, tough. Get some skills. Education is free on the internet these days. There are plenty of libraries. And if you think your poverty gives you the right to get violent and rob people you should be put to death. We used to hang horse thieves, not give them room and board and then welfare. The problem is not too many people. The problem is too many people think everyone deserves access to resoures they don’t own simply because those people exist.”
Like I said in why practically is the Left dead? abolishing the death penalty made a life of crime a possibility and we pay for those aggression genes to breed! A little eugenics required just to get back the old levels!
Resources are placed there by people who earned them, unless they buy on credit. Stealing property is a theft of the owner’s section of mortality to pay for it. Resources are individual, collective only to a family level based on CONSENT.

“Put all hot females in breeding camps and have the most fit males inseminate them then then pay people to raise them. Stupid, genetically damaged animals shouldn’t breed.”

Forced breeding? Like animals?

It’s disturbing how often people seriously suggest rape in civilization, the genetic theft worse than an object. Only the top .1% of men would be required for that, the rest could easily be exterminated like termites. What are the odds the guys suggesting it fit into that bracket when they can’t get, keep and satisfy a single woman? It would also require perfect IQ scores, and many making those suggestions are Third World trash stock. The odds are not in your favour if you had the shit for brains to comprehend them. White women are not your obedient concubines. And the fathers need to stick around to parent or the kids end up damaged, how many want to fuck and run? Fucking r-types, there’s a reason Patriarchy hanged them, they deserved it. Shit for brains and matching morals, just bestial.
They also seem to think Patriarchy means rape when it’s protection FROM rape by fathers and brothers.
Women have 9 months to abort and will out of spite, do not fuck with us. Reproduction must be consensual or men, for example, can easily be cucked.
Punish those who deliberately fuck/breed with inferiors. Especially social isolation. Let them become Morlocks.
The Great Replacement is supposed to distract us from the real need to clean house.
Let’s send all the liberals and bleeding heart celebrity luvvies to Africa once SHTF. They’ll be the only white meat, very moist.
“The writer of this article doesnt seem to understand that the niggers in Africa will literally eat each other if big problems start in the west or Asia. They cant even comprehend basic private property rights and we are to assume they will continue to pump out kids after the free shit from the west stops flowing. There is a reason why niggers didnt massively outbreed civilized folk before we showed up, that shit didnt just fall out of the sky. On top of that, once the medical technology or expertise the west provides to Africa disappears, theyll go back to dieing before theyre even twenty fucking one. I cannot stand these fucking idiots that somehow think Africa became so populous in a vacuum. These charts that try to predict the future are fucking retarded and so is anybody that gives them even a second glance.”
China is shipping human flesh, as mentioned. Whose flesh, is the question?
Outbreed actually means miscegenerate, not to overpopulate.
The white farmers sense the danger and want to move. If your ancestors are dumb enough to move in with savages who believe in cannibalism, please stay there. The gene pool will get a good clean of long-overdue stupidity.
The nitrogen fertilizer is required from the West, the chemical knowledge to produce it, even were the African farmers (real Africans) to suddenly all learn farming and grow a new continental personality. They’re lazier than Italians in July.

The British Empire was a mistake because it was the African Empire and the SJWs get that right. However, we don’t owe them jack. We gave them too much. We need a compound interest on our investment and we’ll step over their corpses once they’ve all killed one another in a probably religious cull back to sensible population levels.
civilize or economize, motherfuckers

It’s very easy to recoup your losses from a dead body.

This whole comment, damn that’s some Super-Fine research, segments;
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-24/why-world-economy-likely-collapse-1-simple-chart#comment-8862487
“It’s true. In the age of exploration, western anthropologists found food to cannibal tribes in a 2:1 ratio along the major african rivers. Food Cannibal Food Food Cannibal Food Food Cannibal….”
“A single man single woman household is something that evolved in North Western Europe during the last ice age. Women had to be beautiful (to show fertility) and able to bear and raise children in the harsh ice climate; men needed to be robust to hunt for long periods.
There are some 30,000 years of differential evolution between Africa and Western Europeans. Isn’t it likely there will be differences?”
Evolution doesn’t stop at the neck, ever.
“This time, the African’s – rather than eating each other, will just walk or boat into Europe.”
Not with British naval supremacy, mate. We can save Europe or just ourselves. I’m waiting to see where my stake is.
“Quote from A troublesome inheritance” A gentleman and a scholar. Tally ho.
Evolution is made by fucking yes but 2/3 up to 75% mostly by killing. This goes for any species, we’ve delayed Darwinism and defied natural selection for so long it’s going to be swooping Death. Hopefully Black Death will go on a comeback tour. I’m such a fan.
History won’t smile kindly on the African uplifters, including the original missionaries. Fucking idiots.
Slavery killed the Empires, thinking those inferior enough to allow conquest deserve a seat at the feast.
Those are your resources for your genetic kin. Do not assist the outgroup or you die.
The Victorians ignored this to fuck the available Oriental and African women. Once again, lust destroys anything good. If they couldn’t fuck slaves, they wouldn’t want to invade or keep them. As bad as the Ottomans in places.
Asia will go back to rice farming if they’re smart.
Otherwise, more crazy Emperors and Communism.
Leave them to it. They’re bloodthirsty in those harsh times anyway.
“Analysis of genomes from around the world establishes that there is indeed a biological reality to race, despite the official statements to the contrary of leading social science organizations. A longer discussion of this issue is offered in chapter 5, but an illustration of the point is the fact that with mixed-race populations, such as African Americans, geneticists can now track along an individual’s genome and assign each segment to an African or European ancestor, an exercise that would be impossible if race did not have some basis in biological reality.”
They haven’t mentioned the mixed-race psychiatric problem. When you hear ‘mental health issues’ check the status of the person talking. Oh, an evolutionally novel combination? High genetic load? No wonder it goes wrong. It’s like randomly mixing botanical extracts. Odds are you’ll end up with poison. Most mutations aren’t bad but fatal. Not always for the host but the host nation.
“The Cro-Magnon. Our ancestors. Athletic enough and intelligent enough to beat off H.Neanderthal. That we are not as robust as Cro Magnpn I assume is the result of changing sexual preferences and the value placed upon the effete aristocracy.”
Wars where only the fit fight and die. If it were equal and all fighting-age men went, that would be different.
Hardier men would develop in a few generations.
More dimorphism so also softer better-looking women too.
It isn’t just the breeding of the white peoples, it’s the quality!
“Lucky for us I don’t think demons can feed off robotic energy. Right? You got to keep some of the livestock alive to breed and raise the next generation?”
Rabbit farming, except the rabbits are the farmers. Who will guard them? Who is without bad blood? At that intergenerational level only blood pays for blood, only justice can be served before anything else.
This post turned really dark but it’s interesting.
At least as a thought experiment.
It reminds me of that tourist story where the Africans demanded children because there was no food and they were hungry. Now the question is, how long until they demand white children in Europe like Aztec sacrifices (no current leader in the big countries has a child among them!) and will they demand from the largest number group, the Muslims?
It would pay dividends to have two historic enemies destroy one another, to have the African eat the Arab and then dispense with the lower IQ remnants for the crime. History is cruel so that will likely play out.
I don’t like it but peaceable solutions are running low. Bear in mind, it takes about three weeks to starve. A year or two and enough cycles of hunger will have reduced their numbers drastically.
They are locusts near a food source, they salt the earth in effect.
If Africa weren’t so huge in real cartographical terms, they’d have gone extinct long ago.
South Europe is particularly screwed but they deserve it. Fail to protect your borders, get invaded. Like the Russians, the North has a secret weapon in the climate and our ability to banish. One harsh winter is all it will take and like in Game of Thrones, they will go South, where food is plentiful. Italians still butcher their food. They’ll be fine.
What do the runners want to replace this with? Chaos is an excuse.

“central banks operate in fiat.. which means fake… but they always prepare a new one in a new country when they have the current one set to collapse… think China now… .RUssia has always been the outlier.”
“Think for a moment of the thirty to fifty years of Suppressed Technology, Military Tech, Alternative Free Energy & Life Extension Tech that has been with held from Public Knowledge.”
“And, since Africa has 9 of the 10 lowest IQ countries in the world (and the average IQ of the whole continent is approx 75) the only population growth, on the planet, will be coming from people who would, on average, be regarded as mentally retarded in the US and Europe…. So it is even worse than the above maths indicates.”

Data? How dare you reply to emotion with reason!
“Wow – white folks are doing a great job “saving” Africa. Kudo’s. Too bad the God will have the final say on Africans.”
Mother Nature May I?
“Why can’t Africa produce something and be a net positive? Why would they be excluded from world population?”
Because you don’t count dependents as adults.
There is no need to import the low IQ or keep slaves minus sex slavery (rape) since robots came in.
So this coming Empire of Who-Knows-Who might be different.
A religion will rise though. Without the State mandating charity at the point of a gun. Christianity might be it as long as we remember compassion has survival limits.
The EU is failing because it believed egalitarian cog theory. The idea is you can be a lazy fuck and retire early as long as there’s some sap to replace you. You can’t replace the high-IQ with the low.
They become a greater drain by far. Then there’s the family they bring over…
On this vast scale, regression to the mean is law. Low-IQ becomes a chaotic entropy.
Europe has been suppressing its fertility and ability for decades. We’re overdue a resurgence of prosperity.
Do you think we’ll want to share?
Do the luvvies want to pay Commie taxes?
Smith was right, ‘human beings are a virus’. The r-selected, that is.
Equilibrium will come to you like Samael.
“which makes the remaining population wealthier on a per capita basis.”
It’s the Golden Goose ratio. More producers, more production on average minus the genocidal policies and disincentives and fewer drains = retention of wealth, compounding.
Foreign charity, the soft imperialism, gave the grandchildren’s birthright away because that anorexic attention whore Audrey Hepburn couldn’t stand to see African children thinner than her. Meanwhile, her own money went entirely to her own spawn. She didn’t surrender any to her own state, let alone the foreign.
Any suggestion of pathologically altruistic policy should be met with: YOU FIRST.
That wealth would have compounded nicely by now. Imagine no debt at birth but an investment. Sweet.
You don’t raise awareness, you raise funds. Other people’s funds. By attention-whoring, middle-class begging to grind down the working class, it’s classist, it kills the homeland competition. They know they’re doing it, they never do local charity work with the poor because they detest them.
You’re not Mother Theresa, she also took other people’s money despite dodgy origins. How nice of her.
End virtue signalling the assholes partake in like a traitorous sport and they’ll quickly find something else to do.
If you want to uplift another country so badly, you should be forced to move there. Also, petition to deport all white Muslims to Saudi Arabia, since it’s so peaceful and not at all Islamophobic. Hold them to the consequences, HARD.
Africa “have yet to pollute their lands because they aren’t yet industrialized.”
False, China recently bought Africa, including its people and nobody cares. Asians are ruthless in destroying natural
resources, look at Japan.
“And most importantly, they are over there and you are over here; they aren’t bothering you at all so why do you care how many babies and by whom that they have?”
~facepalm~
Why cuck for them? Why? Note mentioning the savagery, the rape, the cannibalism, the murder and political corruption triggers them. AKA the Truth.
He goes on!
“Africa has *plenty* of room to grow, that is why so many indians and chinese are moving their. Those two groups are like cockroaches (especially the chinese). They’ve overbred and they’re overcrowding their filthy countries so they emigrate and africa is slowing being taken over by them — so they can destroy those countries too. Africans aren’t bothering anyone; for the most part they stay on their continent and don’t bother anyone.”
Excellent, all Asians can move to Africa and Africans stay there because open borders and avoiding evil Whitey with our demon science.
He’s right about the Chinese though. People are only nice about them because of food. The food is terrible, you have bad taste America. Anytime someone says their favorite food is Chinese, you can ignore them. They eat cardboard with soy.

It’s true that India and China are fucked in unique ways. India will kill itself with the excess male population. China might go down with a fight but I don’t care as long as their cunty new millionaire ‘Princesses’ are sold to Islamic State.
The parents care about money and baby, it might happen.
Traps need bait.
If we want to conquer terrorism, feed them Chinese.
They have the biggest glut of population and no low-IQ excuse.
“Those Muslim groups that claim they will defeat the west by producing many more children paid for by full public assistance seem to understand this.”
That only works if you’re the minority sucking off the state. The ratio? They can’t do math.
Those ‘men’ bred from weak mothers will run off as soon as they’re expected to throw a punch. Notice they never do fist-fights? They’re cowards. Even suicide must be quick to them. The women will also leave but only after trying to whore themselves to dhimmi white men. We already see this with Indians because of their caste system, Muslim women also HATE (all caps) white beauty.
“Not to mention that major universities are shaming young white males for getting erections. Hillary kept warning about how the Pubs wanted to turn back the clock, but haven’t the Dems reinvented Victorianism?”
White men aren’t allowed to act black.
Case – closed.
“The green revolution prevented what would have otherwise been regular famines by now. The green revolution requires massive petroleum inputs to continue providing food for a global population of this size. It is not a sustainable proposition for the world population to continue growing. Perhaps the planet population peaking voluntarily is much better than the other alternatives.”
SANITY!
Let me love you!
Famines are cleanses for the colon of humanity.
“World population will never exceed 9 billion. … It can take less than 3 generations to become extinct.”
Shorter if you castrate and sterilize your enemies. History is fun.
That’s from the Muslim playbook!
“The big problem I see is plague. At a certain point of overpopulation, diseases start to spread, and that can be a really, really nasty way to solve the population problem.”
u r b a n l i v i n g
Such a misnomer.
These people can’t grow radishes.
“Once white people took up socialism they bought into its promises and they stopped having large families (who would have supported them if there was no government support). Add to this abortion and the pill and white people in America and Europe did not produce enough tax payers to support the socialist Ponzi scheme”
s e x u a l  r e v o l u t i o n

Promiscuity kills. Syphilis is coming back. There’s your zombie apocalypse. It rots your fucking face off. Your balls can literally drop off, like raisins. It’s like infective frostbite for your squishy bits.
It also makes the infected rabid. Insane. Sounds like a nice Apocalypse we got brewing.
If the sex-obsessed could be shipped off to an island and once sterilized, spend the rest of their lives fucking each other without medication, under the condition that they never bother the breeding population again or return, we’d ‘lose’ their genetics in a hundred years or so. And never have this issue again.

It’d be something incredulously disbelieved in history books. The Human Bonobos.
It’s like full drug legalization, that had a culling effect. Then after-WW2 only doctors could write prescriptions and we started getting more dross surviving. Let the bachelor alcoholics die in misery.
It’s a great example for the kids. Kids need negative role models, to see them suffer, more than any positive ones.

“There were 76 million people born between the years 1946 and 1964, the traditional window for the baby boom generation. That means that they will retire over a 19-year period. Simple math shows that 76 divided by 19 is 4 million, or almost 11,000 people a day. Say 1,000 die a day. The biggest event in America today is we have l0,000 Baby Boomers retiring each day for years to come. The biggest problem in America is we cannot for the duration support these retiring Baby Boomers. The reason we cannot support these baby boomers is we have not produced a large enough group of supporting taxpayers.”

Well the ones who didn’t have kids because they were too selfish won’t have anyone to defend them against the local marauder rapist gangs.

“Why are Muslims the primary people imported? Muslims don’t have abortions, take the pill and Muslim women are not single moms. It is not uncommon for Muslims to have the 6 to 10 children like white families used to have in America. Congress is counting on this group to generate the missing tax payers.”

Simply ban child brides and mutilation (circumcision removes incentive to be a slut). Pass them free contraception on the quiet, especially shots or implants while their father is away. Feminism will kill the Muslim, freedom isn’t for everyone.

Encourage every Muslim to become SJW. The Unis are doing this already.

Corrosive pop culture will westernize them, fund some Rihanna. Technically they are single mothers since there is a paternal failure to provide. They get disability which matches the IQ, a great excuse to boot them wherever we like. This is assuming they don’t place the dhimmi SJWs in the old Nazi camps once they become useless.

Possible.

“Why is America a bankrupt government? Revenue from current taxes is too low to pay for increasing entitlements and retirees. Deficits and debt plug the entitlement hole until immigrants produce enough taxes to fill the entitlement hole . Government is betting immigrants will produce the taxes to pay for retiring Baby Boomers before America goes belly up. Once the U.S. world reserve currency runs out and the government can no longer print bucket loads of money and debt they will strip the U.S. citizens cupboards bare to keep going.”

You can’t tax work that doesn’t happen.
They immigrate to make more money than they wish to provide the state.
You’ve been played.
I was once told, as many others “you’re entitled to NOTHING, nothing you didn’t earn. And that becomes yours, nobody else can give it or take it away.” The last part was naive but hearing entitlements makes me wanna reach for a hammer.

‘”Overpopulation” is not a problem, nor will it ever be. The global population will never exceed 9 billion, for which this planet is amply capable of sustaining. Paul Erlich predicted overpopulation would lead to human extinction by 1990. Real world studies have shown that this is not possible. Overpopulation is just another scare tactic by the left.’

Has a point, they only ever say breeding is a problem when whites do it, eh?

Guess the race. You can’t check, but it’s manospherian PUA rapist logic at work, you can totally guess.

“Why do you even *care* about what’s going on with Africans in AFRICA? They aren’t trying to rob you or sleep with your daughters or sign up for foodstamps. Yet that’s what is being discussed. If they want to have tons of babies, chuck spears, eat each other why do you care? They’re not doing it here, there doing it 1000’s of miles away from you.

Let’s face it; you poor put upon (mostly) white men need to stop crying about shit that doesn’t concern you. You whine about the pitifully small entitlements minorities get but most entitlements go to white people. And the biggest amount aren’t even called that — they’re called bailouts. Trillions of dollars to rich white bankers. But you focus on some poor black woman living in a dangerous ghetto, barely scraping by. You bunch of asshole, racist hypocrites. You’re the ones who created this mess, not the minorities who don’t have any power in this society.
Worry about your own limp, viagra dependent penises and stop worrying about what africans are doing with theirs.”

‘OMG why do you care about your genetic kin? Why do you CAAAARE? Always the same YYYYYY-ine.
Just let them be raped! They want that masculinity, running away is part of the ‘Game’!
They don’t want you White Man! Step aside and let the real men gang rape them! Celebrate that your race will die! Don’t be racist! p.s. send more foreign aid, our Cousin Chuck needs a new child bride’

Those who gain from the Gravy Train lie about it.
(((white))) bankers was the best bit
They act like they’re scraping by, off their own money. Money to one outgroup is less to the ingroup. It is DEPRIVATION that is the trick to genocide. It’s demographic theft between any group, race, sex, age etc.
Tragedy of the commons looms large in immigration issues. Less for the natives, less for the earners.
when called out;

“The EU is allowing those people to come there — the Northern Africans are not forcing their way in. Just like the rich, white, powerful people are allowing Mexicans to flood this country: because they want them here. Why, I don’t know but those people are invited and if they don’t want to deal with their uncontrolled growth, just stop letting them in.”

Well shooting them in our territorial waters is no different than shooting them on the land itself.
It isn’t like the water is lava and landing means they get to claim on the state lottery complete with free blond Swedish girls bouncing on their balls. I do mean ‘girl’. They’re disgusting parasites, that’s why their home country doesn’t want them. The NGO-fat lawyers run out of money and it’s down to local justice.
“Africa’s overpopulation ISN’T GOING TO STAY IN AFRICA”
We should teach them how to get to America and end in Canada. They want them, right?
Make lots of Little Congos?
Africa doesn’t cease to exist because you’re too blind to include their chart in your GLOBAL economic calculations.
It’s like studying STDs and missing the brothel down the street because Cindy gives you free BJs once a week.
Whatever it is, not science!
If they TALK about Africa, they have to DO something about Africa. They fear the NGOs. The right-wing is missing this.
Cameron promised to bonfire the Quangos (NGOs), voted in and suddenly went silent and got very cucked.
It isn’t specific charities like Greenpeace. Cui bono? Follow the money. Always, always NGOs!
Government will eat the People or People will kill the NGOs bribing Government. Simple.
“It is very simple, reduce the cost of government to every citizen and the population will increase if there is enough room available to be comfortable.Skinner and many other psychologists have demonstrated this principle with rats. Make a rat town, don’t overcrowd it, provide food that has to be worked for and reproduction will be normal for the species. Reduce the food or make it harder to get and the reproduction will decline.
Put the right amount of rats in a rat city and they will get along with each other and stick with raising a family and finding food. Put in too many rats and attacks against other rats will commence. (every rat needs a certain amount of space and food) The more rats that are added the rat fights get deadlier and the reproduction declines. If you keep adding rats some rats will become psychotic and some will become psychopaths.
Nowadays the people who should be having children can’t afford them so they fiddle with their phones instead of their spouse or girl friend. Who do you think will have the most children; a couple on a farm or ranch who work from before sun-up until after sundown to get ahead or a couple of snowflakes who live in a crowded city with high rents working an 8 to 5 low paying menial job in a small office. The liberals have tried to move everyone into the cities since the 1960’s and maybe now they see the result. As long as the government moves people into the cities and burdens them with high rents, high food prices and high taxes and little living space that population will not grow.”
“only the smarts will have jobs”
money*
only the high-IQ will have money
make money, keep money
Why do they think the productive keep a census? It’s a list of citizens.

The Left has committed hari-kari. It’s Mike the Headless Chicken.
It’s dead but it hasn’t stopped being a fucking nuisance yet.
If you don’t breed, you’re like the dodo or the panda, on the dead side of history.

Cultural Marxism’s pets are coming home to roost and they’re hungry.

Let the animals eat the zookeeper. It’s nature, they’re pacifists, let it happen.
Don’t help them. It’s what they would’ve wanted.

You see a feminist being beaten up by a Muslim Sharia Patrol?

You go, Girl!

You can’t match the objectification of Olga, who doesn’t have a brain… or a head.
http://www.stufftoblowyourmind.com/blogs/behold-headless-woman.htm
Yes, it’s an illusion.

The Left is already totally irrelevant. The end of liberalism and the beginning of fascist bannings.
When you make speech laws like the Inquisition’s blasphemy code in a democracy, people just stop talking to you because they don’t want to go to prison. They also stop listening and talk among themselves.
The internet is a symptom not the cause.
Lefties never go to pubs, all the best political conversation isn’t happening in cock-tail bars.
They choose to socially exclude themselves from the working class, and SJW-ism is just pissing on the working class.

We recently decided the best way to fuck with the Left is never have a conversation with them. Play dumb as they think we are, ignore them and move away to other things and people as they speak. Distract them, cut them off, reduce signalling to nil value. They get louder and more virulent in their sedition, openly calling for the end of white people and heterosexuality, it’s funny if it weren’t horrifying. This is happening in the media writ large but it began socially, first with SJW topics and slowly into the economic. We don’t want advice from someone with a trust fund, which, btw, they will lose.

Nobody deserves to be poor but an SJW.

Anytime you see a leftie, be grey. Greyman protocol. Swim in the crowd. They are looking for righties to trigger at and relieve their anxiety. Block them from social media if they get uppity and try to info-gather. Use the same echo chamber stuff on them but only agaisnt them.
They want a target, they want families to break up and teenagers to shout at. They want someone to blame.
Give them nothing. They grew up on empty praise and attention.
Silence, the yawn of being ignored, is HELL, it is torture to the narcissist.
They are forced to turn on the fellow middle-class, exposing the Beast of their rage, or else one another. It was a matter of time.
Do not engage. We have won the debate based on the elections, the Overton window is ours and there is no debate to be had with ‘hate speech’ for science and people who refuse common sense or rules of evolution, logical. Listening to them gives them the public platform. They can’t buy eyeballs or ears. Do not give them and observers the respect of a peer.
They want to end you and your way of life. Let them starve, go Galt on attention whores.

K-shift is coming, friends.

Harassment still illegal but apparently women need extra protection

This is silly. I saw some anti-fems complaining about it and it made no sense

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/county-in-uk-makes-it-a-hate-crime-to-upset-women/article/2596356

It’s already illegal.

Harassment, assault, stalking.

I got a tingling sensation in my Bullshit O’Meter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_Nottingham#Ethnicity

28.46% non-white.

There’s your necessity.

In an effort to crack down on the alleged “tidal wave of abuse and harassment” women face every day, the county’s police force is now considering things like catcalling and pickup lines to be a hate crime if they are directed toward a woman from a man.

They’re never directed the other way and those things are already illegal, they just made it official.
Because you don’t see it the other way, they didn’t mention it.
However, a woman groping a man on public transport? Illegal.
A woman stalker? They happen to celebrities most famously, illegal.
Women being chucked out by a bouncer for refusing to take No for a reply? I’ve seen that more often than the man equivalent because women assume they won’t be hurt or punished for doing it. Illegal, police can be called.

The law is being applied equally but the crime is not practiced by both sexes in the same manner.

includes behavior targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman.

antisocial behaviour
already illegal
however, hate crime is largely hinged on targeting, so yes, it would be, just like the Rotherham rapists going for white girls
it’s part of their motivation, since nobody can help what they were born
we can’t suddenly become men whatever surgery is available
the anti-fems are usually smarter than this…

Of course, that could include anything a woman deems offensive or unwanted from a man. It’s completely subjective.

Exactly. All crimes are on a case-by-case basis. We have these things called judges and juries to sort it out? Not public opinion, or even personal opinion?
Assault is completely subjective according to our law.
Men commit most crimes, this is an expected pattern that they would be the main perp. In any crime. Based on stats.

Newsweek reports that now “everything from verbal comments to unwanted physical approaches” will be considered a hate crime. Send a woman a text when she doesn’t like you? Hate crime. Tell your female friend she looks good today? Hate crime.

That’s hysterical over-reaction. From ‘men’. [or someone who panders to the insecure ones]
You are not forced to make lewd comments (always illegal) nor block someone’s physical space or prevent them from moving, say by grabbing (always illegal). Even our police cannot do those things, see kettling, they’re wearing body cams now. Pick-up endorses these things as building rapport, being an alpha dog and ‘escalating’ ‘kino’. …If the internet told you to jump off a cliff….
How could sending a text be illegal if she gave you her number? Did you take the number? Illegal.
If she’s your friend, why would she report you? How is ‘looking good’ an insult??? [This one nonsense example makes more sense further down when you see the ‘journalist’]

The MGTOW-pandering lot want something to complain about again. This isn’t even in your country. You said something had to be done post-Rotherham, this is part of it. Mind your own shit. You have riots, plural.

The only thing mentioned in the Newsweek article that even remotely sounds like it merits the time of police officers is when a man takes a photo of a woman without her consent. Depending on the type of photo and reason for taking it, that can be disgusting.

We don’t base our laws on how it sounds like to skanky Americans?
Without her consent is the entire frickin’ point. Without. As in, cannot obtain. As in, denied.

Erm it isn’t about what makes the man feel comfortable – that’s the point. If you go up to any stranger and cause public disturbance they could report you, whatever your sex or sexuality or fetishes. Begging is illegal, so is soliciting. This is in keeping with the antique laws, old as paper. We are not a high trust society. You can’t expect to be welcomed by strangers, that is unreasonable, entitled and egoistic/emotional. Women are the ones being approached, not their choice, 99% of the time it’s that way around, the ‘men’ in question do NOT listen when told by a fellow citizen to respect their right to be left in peace because of this shit they read online, and then, as these twerps remind us, all women are in physical danger of rape, so we need to be extra vigilant to potential rapists and protect ourselves.

Pick one. Stranger danger or men do their damn job if they’re claiming to be so masculine.
How do we protect ourselves? Well, we banned guns, most knives, we can’t touch one another, so words will have to do. Fire with fire.

That includes telling a creepy stranger who clearly only wants a free hooker and to comment on your body like parts at a butcher to go fuck himself. Men don’t like being treated this way either, they find it humiliating, demeaning and emasculating.* Real life is not porn. There is no entitlement to sex. They could just leave a card and say nothing but where does it call that illegal? Nowhere! Instead they want to reduce the rights of women in the First World. Unmarried women, because it’s less likely they’ll get beaten up by relations, but I’ve seen it tried on married ones too. Those people are trash. Do not defend them, even vicariously.
Those photos are often posted online, another crime. Upskirts on porn sites for example. Faces are shown, identifying information like locations and bus routes. Do most men wear skirts? No, but I’m sure the law would also be applied to upskirts of a man in a kilt if you want to get decked by a Scotsman. Please, go ahead, internet toughie.

There was no intent to disrespect the unknown woman, but now, just because a man took the photo, that could be a hate crime.

Yanks and your emphasis on bloody opinions. High off your own gas. That sounds like a great legal defense, I didn’t mean to. Truly, superb. I didn’t mean to corner her and grab her and refuse to leave her alone when asked. There was no intent to disrespect in any of that behaviour, judge.

Filming in public is illegal, I covered this with pick-up artists filming in London.
Photos can be incitement of harassment or simply derogatory, libelous to the reputation. Especially with lewd comments. Getting the picture? Actions have consequences. If it gives you a sexual thrill from a stranger, it’s probably illegal e.g. frottage. Your ignorance of our law does not excuse that.

All those whiny outrage feminist articles that most people laugh off as first world problems are now influencing actual criminal law.

Look up the actual criminal law.
Fucking spergs. Shoot these people with the anarchists, they’re a waste of air.
Protecting people is so bigoted! ~ retards

If a Muslim comes up to your 9 year old niece and asks a lewd question, this law would protect her. We don’t have guns and almost no right to physically defend ourselves. What else is there, darling?
It’s a reaction to the cultures they freely admit are truly misogynistic. As in, women as cattle-whores. With no choice, so keep trying it on. Any unchaperoned woman is fair game to rape. Okay, side with those people, but don’t pretend your incentive is First World freedoms.

There is no arguing against this if you look it up. Journalists do research, not this vacuous bitching.

Shockingly, domestic abuse won’t be considered a hate crime, even though it is an objectively offensive crime, because it has its own established procedure. Go figure.

Number one. OPINION IS NOT LAW. Ahem.

It won’t be considered a (new) crime (on the books) because it’s already a crime with all the full statutes to cover it, isn’t that TERRIBLE?!

Checkmate, feminazis! You already protect women in the comfort of their own home!

what wtf wut confused shocked are you seeing this omfg how

Also, men are protected from being battered by their spouses too! Because that happens and the law recognizes it! The UK legal system hates men and this is PROOF! ahahahahaha!

“Understanding this as a hate crime will help people to see the seriousness of these incidents and hopefully encourage more women to come forward and report offences.”

Guess the perps. Why would they be afraid of reporting white men in their own country?
Because it isn’t mostly white men committing these crimes.
It’s those who prey on white meat. Sure, screw the harassers whatever their race, same with all criminals, but sexual crime isn’t fine if the perp is a white male. There are no Get Out Of Jail Free cards, unless you’re really arguing for some kind of institutional, legally valid white privilege?

“Women and girls face a tidal wave of abuse and harassment every day. Our law has to send a clear signal that this is not acceptable. It is a crime.”

That woman quoted as if she is wrong, is correct. It’s a re-codification and clarification of the law, this happens locally all the time (case law?). I may think hate crime logic is flawed, severely, but if you’re gonna have it, it’d be a good idea for places like Sweden or Germany to take it up, don’t you think?
The purpose is to DETER more serious crimes, by people who already don’t respect the law of this country.

…who could that be?????

It protects the white women because the men aren’t doing it.

omg really wtf go away no audrey

This will become common, and necessary, as things get worse.

Sure, blame us. Blame the victims. You want tradition, though, right? As long as you don’t have to get off your arse.

It must be nice to have so little actual crime that the police can focus on such things.

It sounds like the nasal tone of a bitchy pajama boy. I could also go into a Swiss bank wearing a ski mask and holding a black water pistol. I don’t because that is a stupid thing to do. Do not act like a rapist if you are not a rapist. If women must protect ourselves, the law must support us in that endeavor because the men forsook their sex’s historical duty.
If women are victims, should the police laugh it off? But when the NYE attacks happened it was all “they’re hurting our women! we must stop this! we need more laws!”

The real question: why do you assume your behaviour toward women would get you into legal trouble?

Wouldn’t the judge let you off, if you truly did nothing wrong?
It’s like the ones who say I just wanted to buy her a drink as if that was really It and spiking drinks doesn’t happen. Women are not under any obligation to accept attentions from men, it is dangerous. That’s why men threaten women with rape online, when we can’t even see who it is but they can see us. Playing I’m Not Like the Other Guys snowflake routine doesn’t work, because you are a stranger. The rapists say that too. The ones so nice they have to remind you/tell you how Nice they are, because you can’t be trusted to form that opinion by yourself. Nobody should be given the benefit of the doubt where matters of physical safety are concerned. This isn’t even a sexual point, it’s common sense.

Freedom of association. Freedom. As in, everyone. Nothing to do with voting rights (suffrage was universal, not female) or emotionality (ostrogen is not the emotion hormone, if anything that’s testosterone with clear forensic links to crime and mental instability). There’s really no such thing as too much oestrogen in women, and in men it’s actually too little testosterone, rather than oestrogen, causing their health problems. HBD doesn’t care about your feels. “Estrogen is partly responsible for creating healthy sperm” #science

Do you remember what the excuse was, of the Rotherham rapists to the police?
They’re our girlfriend.
How was this possible?

They picked her up. Between ‘home’ and school. Pick-ups. Literal. In taxis. 

They go on to mention an online poll, about online stuff.
As if that has anything to do with this.
Online. Aka not in public. Not a law. Not even English.

Then-

That actually makes this law misandrist, since only men can be the perpetrators even though women are guilty as well.

It doesn’t say that and case law, a single case, could easily disprove it. With the help of the Equality Act, you silly Yank.
‘That’ says nothing but triggered opinion. You and your specious non sequiturs.

As we’ve seen time and time again from outrage feminists [American] on social media [online], any criticism of a woman is misogyny [patently false]. That would make this article misogynist [if you say so?], but I wouldn’t be prosecuted [but…you just said… it broke a law] — not just because I don’t live in Nottinghamshire [you don’t need to, it’s called a holiday?] — but also because I’m a woman. [nope, a lesbian would also be guilty of harassing women, you utter prat]

This guy (sperg logic, more masculine) is as retarded as Lindy West.
Even she wouldn’t go that far into Whataboutism derailment combined with What IF.
I often slag off male opinions on this topic when they’re wrong, because men are usually the only ones discussing these things. This is an example of a dippy conservative cuck, shilling for shekels like the best Jezebel tarts.

Wait, so all this being triggered is still from a woman, objecting to misogyny objections, even though there’s no feminists in sight?

….Wow America. You used to be cool.
She’s actually siding on the same side as ISIS, because America.

Kevin-Hart-Really-o rlly lies

It’s like a Yank right-wing Claudia Boleyn, she assumes that anything protecting women is automatically bad and wrong based on her political position (more insulting, as true conservatives do not hate women) but actually Claudia is more logical than this person.

It’s almost as if we abandoned our moral standards and manners, and then panicked over their absence and are now trying to bring them back in the form of legislation.

WE?

OUR?

Whither this liberal universalism henceforth stench?

Who is dis bich?

Let’s take bets, shall we?

Well, that explains everything.

Well, that explains everything.

Her message is Don’t listen to stupid women – unless they’re me.

She’s jealous of the women who actually get hit on, regardless of the danger involved. No wonder she hates feminists. Narcissism of small differences, isn’t it?

Spot the difference.

Spot the difference.

We have a self-hating women vying for male attention by insulting herself like a male feminist/self-hating beta and a man-hating woman who wants to fuck men out of revenge by taking their own money to make it possible.

“I’m on Instagram because of peer pressure” reads her Instagram bio.
Yes, her politics are informed by similar concerns.

She is living proof that she is wrong but sees no contradiction.

Women don’t think like me. aka I’m special. You’re a woman. Technically. Proving women can and do, in fact, have differing opinions. Like men. I’m careful to say feminist when I mean feminist, not woman. It’s silly to assume someone always takes a position for sexual attention (like White Knighting) as if there are opinions you can’t hold for logical reasons, but in this case…

Why do I think she’s attention-seeking for her career?
Well before, a few years ago, she was covering such important political topics as milk.

http://townhall.com/columnists/asheschow/2012/08/13/when_did_milk_become_bad_for_you

I will refrain from the obvious joke about guzzling approval.

She also cosplays. According to search engines.

I wonder, if a Muslim were to harass her in this costume, whether she’d be asking for it?

Tbf, she denies it. I doubt that’s her arse neither. Otherwise she’d know about harassment firsthand.

Whatever, point still stands. If that was her in the picture, feel free to harass her whatever she is wearing or doing or even if she asks you to stop, because women are never legitimately the victims of bad men since feminists exist.

All men are good and would never harass, stalk or rape women!
Ignore those pesky crime data reports!

That isn’t just as retarded as the All Victim narrative!
No Victims, heard it here first.

*http://metro.co.uk/2015/06/06/this-is-what-happened-when-a-woman-catcall-men-5233425/
They only included the ones in this reel where men liked it. Try it in real life. Ask random men to smile in the street and watch their Wow you creep reaction. Whoever does it. Have a load of regular feminists go up to men and paw at them, building kino. I said if they wanted to ruin Roosh V, they’d follow him around copying him. Forever. And distribute his step-by-steps in public flyers. Well, if it’s legal and morally acceptable, no problem right? So they can’t complain when other men hit on them because that’s misandrist. Men get to hit on whoever they want, including other men. Watch what happens when we take the brakes off gay rapists.

harassment

No, that is exactly what men do nowadays. They call it banter or lad culture, it isn’t. They walk up to women and speak like that, like they’re in porn. I find recording them makes them go away because they know there’s something to be ashamed of. This law is supposed to make them confine that stuff to anonymous internet comments where it’s less likely to escalate and easier to prove. Young men talking the way rappers only used to get away with in music videos.

It’s an American expectation based on tipping culture, antidepressant culture with pills to make you smiley and the power dynamic of servers. A random woman in the street is not angling for a tip, any tip. A neutral expression is not sad. I once heard a model describe it thus when recounting one instance, “No, I won’t smile at you because I’m not serving you. In fact, I’m better than you because you need my approval and you’ll never have it.”
If women don’t smile at you, maybe you’re the reason?

Any random person talking to you in public is weird. Doesn’t need to be sexual.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/northerner-terrorised-london-by-saying-hello-20151001102473

the world is not America
women do need protection, that isn’t saying men do not
also, women need a labour ward, is this sexist?

these people are still crying sexism for any acknowledgement of differences but also trying to argue the feminist crying is wrong because logic and differences? Idiots.

The retardation of the left

retardedlefties

I wanted to post how cognitive dissonance doesn’t even apply to these people because they cannot see contradictions, not understanding basic logic, but then I also saw how Emma Watson has been showing off her threads surrounded by poor black kids. So I doubled up. The great thing about Twitter is picking on their stupidity in real time.