The people who hate you want doubt, despair, hopelessness.
Deny them it.
They play dumb. Men moreso.
The people who hate you want doubt, despair, hopelessness.
Deny them it.
They play dumb. Men moreso.
Alternate title: Damsel in distress, pathological altruism edition.
This toxic colonialism is bullshit. Deport the cuckians first.
IQ has nothing to do with gullibility. Predators have their own intelligence.
It isn’t charity with somebody else’s money. Damselling is pride.
(And by all definitions I know, treason!)
If it’s about love, why do they want money? – hookers come in many forms
Behold, the savage prostitute. A dog turd spray-painted gold still smells like shit.
“I don’t care if she’s a stripper, we’re in love!” Geopolitical edition.
World, you aren’t a damsel, you aren’t even a dame. Whitey is not your husband, we owe you nothing.
Okay, I’ll be happy to give them a one-time lump sum if they 1. leave us alone and STFU on it forever and 2. are forbidden from using White developments, all of them. Globalism is expensive.
Technological multiculturalism is killing us. Literally.
This is more brutal than me.
“People who always have a need for approval from others give out signals that there’s something wrong with their lives.”
What to add? What to add?
Narcissists and borderlines and psychopaths will make a pretense at feeling like this and using these, to play the victim and use others. Look at outcomes. If they got what they wanted all the time, they’re not the victim here.
Little Emperor Syndrome is genetic. I never met a brat without brat parents.
Great point, but reverence for marriage itself is what we’re aiming at. It isn’t about any individual being ‘happ-y’, like every divorcee ever crows, humans aren’t like dogs, happiness doesn’t happen – it’s a useful excuse to do whatever they want in the moment, usually swinging, the true origin of hookup culture. Liberals started acting like everything was all ‘for the children’ the moment they wanted access to the neophyte brains of the conservative’s children. A behaviourist once said ‘give me the boy at 7 and I’ll give you the man’. You give a liberal your kids from 3-18… and they’re a drooling moron.
Once the ‘consenting adults’ excuse to morality doesn’t apply, they have NOTHING.
Unlike most lists, actually not BS.
This is exactly what they do, I’ve found recording their lies and inconsistences to be especially helpful. I have a particular distaste to the religious examples, but it does befit the CHINO.
For example, narcissists always project to me that I am;
It’s one of the best ways you can tell you are truly intelligent, because a stupid narcissist will always think everyone else has the accusation of stupidity as their greatest weakness as well. They will state the opposite of the truth, making up character flaws, trying to cause doubt which develops into a neurotic complex (if you believe the best thing about you is the worst you will believe anything else they tell you), perhaps a condition they fuel up to suicide (why they say “please kill yourself”). They’ll bitch about you behind your back, but that’s a sign you’re doing something right, as they wouldn’t dare confront you to your face, like an adult.
I know I am not any of those things because super-empaths, Nature’s mirrors, really like me, they find me chill and serene (unlike the narcissists, who sometimes try and call me angry, piping-hot with rage, when I’m more, at most, like irritated at a buzzing fly in my face).
It’s difficult to take those people seriously when you’ve been told by some expert authority figures (many in psychiatry) how one is the complete and total opposite of these flawed, pathetic creatures, and how refreshing that is. “Too honest” is my fave. As if that’s a real thing.
Think of it from their perspective.
They want to be positive things A, B and C. Desperately. Their whole life has been leading up to it.
They come across someone who is A and it irks them. They make snide putdowns about how being A is “fake” behind their back. Fake nice to their face.
They come across someone who is both A and B. This angers them and they try to bring this person down to their level of misery by turning their greatest strength against them – you’re not *really* AB, they’ll say, you’re the opposite, the universally hated XY, and you should feel guilty and hate yourself for being those things.
They come across someone AB and C. Rage fires on all cylinders. This person must be destroyed, or if not, cast from even their peripheral vision (i.e. urgh, I’m trying to forget <person> exists). They become bitter, vindictive, spiteful, and if this is responded to accordingly by the victim, yes, they are a real victim to this damaging monster, it should show up to their friends as an alarming lashing out. The narcissist will blame the victim, of course, it was their fault. They are normally the opposite (a sort of reverse projection again to look saintly). If the friends help purge the evil influence, which makes them act in a way that scares their friends, they won’t be angry anymore and need to take it out on anyone (including, the friends who refuse, implicitly). This causes monstering. “Nobody likes you”, “The world is a terrible place with you in it”, and “kill yourself” are all the things they believe about themselves. They have no logic behind them, unless it’s twisted beyond recognition.
If you happened on this page because one of these is after you, you have my sympathy.
You are the Victim. You can’t handle them. You must kick them out of your life, which revokes their power to ruin yours. When you’ve made it clear it’s over, they will expect you to crawl back (they’re narcissists) over the broken glass they made with your own pain. If you still have friends in common, the best revenge is to let those friends know how happy you are, since the narcissist will fish for this information.
This isn’t an internet thing. It’s science: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Pathological-Altruism-Barbara-Oakley/dp/0199738572
Everyone needs to read this book. Damn, I need someone to upload a PDF to link to.
Essentially, everything wrong with the West exists because it exploits this psychological niche. These people have a compulsive need to give up everything they have to the point of their own destruction, and in fact, get a perverse enjoyment from the situation.
Article referenced, not as good as a whole book of research but still – http://www.pnas.org/content/110/Supplement_2/10408.full.pdf
Oxytocin’s effect of envy and gloating directly explains SJWs: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/oxytocin-hormone/ e.g. “Educate yourself”, “Check your privilege” and other patronising non-comebacks designed to shut down debate. It’s relational narcissism. http://gradworks.umi.com/35/15/3515488.html They have nothing else in their lives. An identity movement allows them a platform for power-tripping and control-freakery (semi-religious) with no other qualification than their existence.
Normally these people would wither on the vine. The Internet has allowed them to congregate and reinforce one another’s issues, until they become a toxic, virulent hypersensitive meme. Wouldn’t you know it, reification is a Marxist concept. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reification_(Marxism) See: Patriarchy, Rape Culture, Sexual Objectification. I guess all this connection to Cultural Marxism’s philosophy is a massive coincidence.
n.b. Oxytocin increases abuse risk too, including verbal abuse. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/talking-about-trauma/201507/love-hormone-oxytocin-linked-domestic-violence
I’ll interject with a little background since I happen to know something to contribute.
I once heard a thought experiment from a nouveau realist artist. They’re trying to bring back form.
If you were walking around a scrapyard, and you found this work of “art”, a little distressed and muddy, would you know what it was? Would you recognise it? Furthermore, would you feel compelled to ‘save’ it?
I’ve yet to find a better test.
AC has touched on this profound schism between the ancient standard of art (K-selected amygdala) and the postmodern ….excuse.
Historically, the turnaround point could have been at two places. The backlash against The Academy in Victorian times (Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood’s sexualisation onward) or, it laid the groundwork for the likelier of the two. A backlash against Nazi Germany, itself in contrast to “Degenerate Art” aka what we now laud as Modern, almost a century later. When the Nazis lost, it became a show of Allies’ patriotism to oppose the Nazi standards and anything symbolically on a tangent with them (Hugo Boss suits included) and to fill the vacuum with whatever was disgusting, depraved or shocking (cough Holocaust porn cough), and call that “beautiful” to mirror the implied equality of humans (with mud) versus the racial hierarchy. What a lot of people don’t know is that the Nazis did showcase an exhibit of this inferior artwork…. next to ideal Nazi examples with perfect lighting. The contrast was apparent. Hence, when the Jews opened their own art galleries after the war, which style of art do you think they bought? Art is a market after all, a lot of money in it, and even today, the market is overvalued thanks to billionaire tax breaks. When those stop, the market will collapse, and the New Money from China will be left holding its dick.
Naturally, there are those who disagree with the analysis but the timings and statements about the only true art being ‘political art’ are persuasive ipso facto;
We can easily dismiss demonising talk of the Jews who destroy art in order to break Aryan spirit.
…Photography is to painting as pornography to real women. Both create an illusion of real thing, but leave a lingering emptiness. In the long run, the real thing suffers. Pornography undid many happy unions. Reproduction of art conditioned us to view uninspiring beauty. It is difficult to view a painting of Mona Lisa without instinctively comparing it to its endless reproductions. In a way, the modern art was a botched response to reproductions, for an artist needs to attract attention of blasé viewers. unz
Yet, if you dare suggest there is an objective standard of beauty, and that art must depict both beauty and technical expertise hard-won from thousands of hours in studio, the sudden shuffling of feet to disassociate with you would create another, firmer impression.
The current line? Personal ‘expression’. Lauding the Self and all it makes (cough period art cough) as God.
Think: Is the issue with the artist or the viewer?
A culture can be readily judged by the superiority or inferiority of their artwork.