Facecrime is here

h/t https://abruptearthchanges.com/2019/01/23/orwellian-face-crime-maga-kids/

Being white is now the crime.
It was acting white, then dressing white then talking white.
The bullies going after these kids are the new witch finder generals.
Kafkatrapping anti-white classists against the working poor.

Breathing while white.

We’re enemies? Fine, we owe you nothing.

And no bailouts.

White people aren’t bowing to the savages anymore, what a beautiful act of defiance.

Only a savage would walk up to a random guy and try to intimidate them with some weird song and a drum. If anyone’s cursed, it’s the group with an IQ in the 80s who fucked their cousins and brag about what losers they are.

What really happened:

The composure, the character, in one so young.

It’s almost Buddhist or old European. Dignity.

I am the future, old angry man.

They should’ve chanted about IQ and GPA (generally) and sung Tomorrow belongs to me.

It’s time we used musicals. Weaponise the gay.

The old man isn’t an elder.

He has no place among white Christians.

It’s respect YOUR elders, not other people’s!

Second-class natives

This is the common opinion.

“Just ‘cos you see something, doesn’t make it true,” says the fat piggy.

They gaslighted him on national TV, also the common reaction.

“Positive discrimination” is genocide.

The taxes of one, who cannot afford children, paying for the breeding of the other.

That is slavery.

It’s kinda like handing all that money to criminals, including rapists, and the victims get nothing.

We live in a culture that celebrates evil.

It rewards laziness, greed, lust. It punishes hard work, honesty (a Christian virtue) and prudence.

We could just place all new immigrants in Hampstead and other very lefty areas. See how they like it.

comment

The people on this panel need a lesson in classical philosophy. Let me make it as simple as I know how. Hatred is a SIN, NOT a crime.

wrong, “hate what is evil”

you’re supposed to hate, if it’s righteous

if it’s a hatred of injustice

I could sit in a rocking chair in my basement all day and all night hating you. I could gather with my friends (if I had any) and we could hate you collectively—even gleefully. And we would be in trouble with God—but not with the government. We would only be in trouble with the government if we robbed you, or killed you, or beat you up, or lied to you or lied about you, or raped your wife or daughter, or burned your house or business, or any number of other such ACTS. But I could sit in my own home hating you 24/7/365 and I would have broken no civil or criminal laws, and no government agency could justifiably arrest me. In brief, so called hate crimes are an attempt of government leftists (aka, marxists) to blur the line between church and state for the purpose of usurping that which belongs to the Creator by unworthy and unwise creatures. Equally, as frightening is the realization that the recent invention of so-called Hate Crimes is a nascent attempt of government at not only regulating and punishing what it may adjudge as wrong-speech, but wrong thought! For the government to be able to declare hatred as a civil crime opens the possibility of an incalculable number of great and grave injustices. In the past, both secularists as well as many who are religious INSIST such distinctions must remain, and for good reason–especially in this age. When the people sit passively and allow the government to blur the lines between sins and crimes we passively allow our governments to seize a monstrous amount of power over the individual that will result in the complete loss of all our civil liberties. So, to Hell with all these glorified so-called elite experts on this panel. Know this: you cannot arrive at the right answer when you cut God and the transcendent out of the equation.

Love the boot on your face. Hatred is illegal. Negative emotion is banned. Lick the boot.

Thoughtcrime. You’re free to agree.

And if they come for the traitors with a rope, they’ll cry “what did I do? I’m innocent!”

You see those French vest protests? Just ‘cos you see something, doesn’t make it true…

Well, they read all the history books at their posh schools. They should’ve known this was coming.

Marx was smart enough to know the working class holds the power, the middle class delegating all this bullshit is nothing without them. You don’t replace your base.

Asians are now more privileged in Britain, more of them are middle-class (census data), the face of poverty is white in our homeland. Why? All the charity money is thrown based on skin colour. Middle-class people are getting grants and loans and help, because of who their parents are. That is injustice. That is a caste system.

comment

Britain should always put British born citizens first and that goes for any country, the indigenous people should be first in their homelands otherwise you will lose the identity of what that nation is. I want the world to be diverse just not my country or city or street for that matter. I want a strong community that can relate to each other and look after each other, why is that okay for everyone but white people?

Imagine what will happen when the immigrants of the past century find out the welfare state is broke.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/04/25/we-are-totally-fucked/

It is broke. They are here to pay.

“The world needs anger. The world often continues to allow evil because it isn’t angry enough.” ~ Bede Jarrett

It started with the women, told to sit down and shut up. Who cares if you’re publicly harassed, children bullied, daughter threatened with rape?

Then they tried it on the men. Mostly, they sat down and shut up.

White ppl r ignorant lol

Basic Guardian bitch comment:

Look closely and you might spot some anti-white snobbery.

I know it’s difficult to read between the lines but in this case there is no longer a line.

They hate white people.

Replace with any other group and they’d be calling for arrests.

Do they know white people are protected by the Equality Act?

“These low-information Jewish voters take pleasure in their own ignorance and bigotry.”

“Muslims vote against their own interests and then feel sorry for themselves because their lives are so impoverished.”

“If a woman is hungry, tired or poorly educated, how can they shoulder the burden of reading actual facts and figures from reputable sources?”

“Do you want someone else to make your decisions for you because it’s easier to trust a journalist than-”

wait nope can’t have that one, can we?

“Surely, that would be condescending and paternalistic.”

The word that magically eludes them is CLASSISM.

They cry if you use it.

From

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/23/trump-boris-johnson-rightwing-populists

The worst low information voters think they’re high information academics because they trust journalists and fall for every pie chart they see.

Here’s a breakdown of Guardian readers:

Rich people own papers, you morons.

Beautiful comment:

What we really need of course is more middle class Leftists telling us how the working class really want Marxism, Socialist dictatorship presided over by Left-wing know-it-alls, uncontrolled immigration, multi-culturalism to fragment communities, and political correctness so that certain groups can be held to lower standards of behaviour in the name of equality.

Apparently the working classes have been gagging for all of these things for years but have failed to understand it because of false consciousness and the evil media etc. etc. etc.

And the favoured classist metaphor is a reply:

want some salt for that chip?

Call out the classism and watch them utterly fail to behave with anything less than contempt to those they deem inferior.

Another reply:

How do you explain that if everyone being white and British equals peace and prosperity? How do you rationally make the case given there are places all over the world mono cultrual which are pure shitholes and places awash with a 100 peoples doing great?

It’s called IQ. National IQ. There’s no such thing as British anyway, the Empire is dead. British doesn’t exist. I’ve never met a British person. I’ve met English, Irish, Scottish and Welsh, never British. You could write Martian on my passport, it doesn’t alter my DNA. The EU doesn’t exist either. I’ve never met an EUian.

Moreover, burden of proof is on the people who want whites on reservations in their homelands, why that should happen by replacement. Third World fertility is endless, inevitably that would result.

He goes on

Thank heaven people die, this generation of morons will one day go and then there might be at least a rational debate not involving the modern equivalent of

“My crops died, it was Goodwife Adams cursed my fields, burn the witch and all will be well”

that blaming a few tens of millions of immigrants worldwide for today’s woes is.

I hope he can hold that civil debate in Arabic.

This is why demographics need to be taught in schools.

To another comment:

but liberals don’t deliberately spread racial and ethnic hate the way the right does. So there is a difference.

I need a ciggie, I’m spent.

Race and ill health

Scrambling for nurture excuses, are we?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25526/

Fails to account for IQ, social mobility isn’t equally possible.

The participant with a higher visual acuity gets the pilot position.

Unless they’re seriously suggesting we should dole out positions and their responsibility (legal) on the incompetent? That sounds more like a curse on them.

The simpler explanation (Ockham) is that health impacts the ability to strive and lower IQ causing poorer lifestyle choices compounds the ill health as a permanent feature.

How to truly test this?
Within a race, some castes do poorly and this is both represented in lower IQ scores than their genetic kin as well as “poor” health. Where one caste e.g. Western-living Indians, represents a middle-class (as in the UK), white people are at a distinct disadvantage – disproving and debunking the privileged status hypothesis. So-called “positive discrimination” or reverse racism, leads more opportunities to the class who least deserve it (financially stable) purely on the basis of race (racist).

Race isn’t a qualification. To treat it as any sort of meaningful status opposes the Race Relations Act.

The BBC should’ve been stripped of taxpayer funding the moment it refused to hire white people, the taxpaying majority. As a point of fact, how come they’re allowed to turn a private profit? Isn’t that also a monopoly?

You can’t study class and discrimination without classism but ah! They won’t do that!

Wonder why.

How hard do white natives work to reach a given position, eh?

The question never published nor studied.

Who has it easier? It would be easy to study but I’ve seen nada.

Does meritocracy cease to apply if your skin has a certain level of pigment?

Is this the new coffee-coloured aristocracy? Reign of error.
When you hire someone on the basis of skin colour, you make everyone who looks like them look similarly incompetent. Who’s racist?

Public interest, equality in hiring/promotion/wages and all that.

Favouring one party is a direct oversight spurning the other.

Over-representation is treason. i.e. Should whites govern Africa?

Bias is scientifically proven, ruling over the outgroup impartially is impossible for all races.

Whose interests do they represent in practice? That would prove neutrality, if they also plugged white and poor causes. …No? Have they ever represented the majority …. in a democracy? Anything less is indeed treason.

It comes down to this: who pays the academic’s share of taxes for these divisive papers?

Are the poor working two or more jobs expected to slave away for those who write inciteful documents encouraging their oppression?

Einstein noticed things

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44472277

In them, he makes sweeping and negative generalisations, for example calling the Chinese “industrious, filthy, obtuse people”.

Einstein would later in life advocate for civil rights in the US, calling racism “a disease of white people”.

In other entries he calls China “a peculiar herd-like nation,” and “more like automatons than people”, before claiming there is “little difference” between Chinese men and women, and questioning how the men are “incapable of defending themselves” from female “fatal attraction”.