Biblical basis of socialism and work ethic

ECC 5

“10 Whoever loves money never has enough;
    whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with their income.
    This too is meaningless.

11 As goods increase,
    so do those who consume them.
And what benefit are they to the owners
    except to feast their eyes on them?

12 The sleep of a laborer is sweet,
    whether they eat little or much,
but as for the rich, their abundance
    permits them no sleep.

13 I have seen a grievous evil under the sun:

wealth hoarded to the harm of its owners,
14     or wealth lost through some misfortune,
so that when they have children
    there is nothing left for them to inherit.
15 Everyone comes naked from their mother’s womb,
    and as everyone comes, so they depart.
They take nothing from their toil
    that they can carry in their hands.

16 This too is a grievous evil:

As everyone comes, so they depart,
    and what do they gain,
    since they toil for the wind?
17 All their days they eat in darkness,
    with great frustration, affliction and anger.

18 This is what I have observed to be good: that it is appropriate for a person to eat, to drink and to find satisfaction in their toilsome labor under the sun during the few days of life God has given them—for this is their lot. 19 Moreover, when God gives someone wealth and possessions, and the ability to enjoy them, to accept their lot and be happy in their toil—this is a gift of God. 20 They seldom reflect on the days of their life, because God keeps them occupied with gladness of heart.”

Dark.

Bonus: a check against the cult of natalism.

Ecc 6:3

A man may have a hundred children and live many years; yet no matter how long he lives, if he cannot enjoy his prosperity and does not receive proper burial, I say that a stillborn child is better off than he.

7

Everyone’s toil is for their mouth,
    yet their appetite is never satisfied.

It’s called ‘inside money’

Bank of England Admits that Loans Come FIRST … and Deposits FOLLOW

All of it is a liability. All of it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inside_money

In monetary economicsinside money is money issued by private intermediaries (i.e. commercial banks) in the form of debt (credit).[1] This money is typically in the form of demand deposits or other deposits, and hence is part of the money supply. The money, which is an asset of the depositor but coincides with a liability of the bank, is inside money.[2]

Inside money is thus a liability (equivalently a negative asset) to the issuer, so the net amount of assets associated with inside money in an economy is zero. Most money circulating in a modern economy is inside money.[3]

There’s no such thing as a rich person. They just have a bigger credit line.

Be jealous, people, they’re allowed to get in more debt!

Even the banks aren’t rich, the money is a debt, a huge liability created by nothing, no value of labour behind it, aka fountain pen money.

O mountain of Mine in the countryside, I will give over your wealth and all your treasures for booty, Your high places for sin throughout your borders.

And you will, even of yourself, let go of your inheritance That I gave you; And I will make you serve your enemies In the land which you do not know; For you have kindled a fire in My anger Which will burn forever.

Thus says the LORD, “Cursed is the man who trusts in mankind And makes flesh his strength, And whose heart turns away from the LORD.

For he will be like a bush in the desert And will not see when prosperity comes, But will live in stony wastes in the wilderness, A land of salt without inhabitant.

https://biblehub.com/jeremiah/17.htm

Rely on yourself.

“Blessed is the man who trusts in the LORD And whose trust is the LORD.

“For he will be like a tree planted by the water, That extends its roots by a stream And will not fear when the heat comes; But its leaves will be green, And it will not be anxious in a year of drought Nor cease to yield fruit.

…”I, the LORD, search the heart, I test the mind, Even to give to each man according to his ways, According to the results of his deeds.

As the great philosopher Britney said, you better work, bitch.

Not for the Banks, not for Amex, for yourself.

“As a partridge that hatches eggs which it has not laid, So is he who makes a fortune, but unjustly; In the midst of his days it will forsake him, And in the end he will be a fool.”

You are not rich because you cucked enough for The Bank (central) to give you more zeros.

It’s an empty parking space and you’re claiming a car. An invisible car you cannot drive.

Might as well claim prime real estate circling the moon designed like a teapot.

If you are incredulous about the system, you understand it.

Rich people, the Rich, the 1%, don’t exist.

The Emperor has no clothes.

Do not be a terror to me; You are my refuge in the day of disaster.

Let those who persecute me be put to shame, but as for me, let me not be put to shame; Let them be dismayed, but let me not be dismayed. Bring on them a day of disaster, And crush them with twofold destruction!

Stock traders have IOUs. Paper you can burn, digital is a poxy etch a sketch in 4k.

Riches are your value, your labour, your worth. What you can DO.

How many rich people can clean a toilet? What is their net worth?

Many of them don’t realise this (Birkin lovers) but the top tier (Rothschilds etc) do.

They waste decades of life to pay fealty taxes for a box.

They were too cheap to install walls and cheaped out with white paint too.

Lead paint is white. You breathe it in. It also glazes that Chinese teapot.

White glazed Ikea table, fast furniture? Lead paint. Any cheap white paint (from China) used in your home on anything. Lead. You didn’t plan on having kids, right?

Kiss the ring of modernism, tastes like cancer.

It’s cheap because it asks for your soul.

We willingly trade our value for their paper, their zeroes, their system.

Who has the value here? Really? If we all downed tools, who would we notice missing?

Why was Cromwell’s corpse dug up and dragged through the street?

Why did England briefly and successfully use sticks as currency?

Does the Bank of England belong to the English People?

If we twig, if the penny drops and we figure it out, are they rich?

Are they really?

The car that needs a mechanic, the house that needs a plumber, the inept parents who need a nanny, the kid who needs a tutor, the computer that needs a nerd. The home owner who can’t use their own kitchen and needs a chef.

They’re useless children without the workers.

HELPLESS.

If we reject inflation as a tax on producers of society by merchants, what can they do?

Force us to work? Nope.

That’s why they need to keep you distracted, desperate and hungry, fearful of the next meal.

You don’t have to become poorer every year.

That’s their system. It’s the illusion, mirage you work for that gives them power.

Consider, an income of zero, could a rich person live off that? Naturally.

They don’t need Money IN, they’re rich!

Wait, they can’t afford a year’s worth of property, car, school tax etc. without fresh income?

What does rich mean, then?

It’s a system of illusion supported by modernism. It’s temporary.

See:

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2014/05/01/seeing-the-future-on-economy-culture-decline/

Fucking CALLED IT.

song at 23:10, watch at 2x speed

Men make more money from marriage than women

http://www.mademan.com/want-to-get-rich-get-married/

I bet that red pill hurts when you take it up the ….

A new study released by the Pew Research center is suggesting that increasing number of men are getting a larger economic boost then their partners when they get married. This has changed over the last decade as women, as a sex, have increased their education level and, subsequently, their earnings. Basically: you’re much more likely to marry a rich girl than you used to be. Maybe it’s not as expensive to fall in love as we thought.

Are we gonna complain? Are we calling you all sorts of things, like parasites? No. Because that’s a cheap dig at the opposite sex and the economy is down, a family has to stick together against the world. Yet still, I get the feeling the usual suspects are going to try and claim victim here (still, despite making bank) and insult women for supporting themselves (aka responsible adulting) and contributing to the home (as men have been asking us to do now two incomes are required to live). We literally cannot win, some people will always complain whatever we do.

Naturally, this shoots their hypergamy idea (not the academic real kind but the stupid idea women only marry to gain male status) and kicks it into its own grave, so don’t expect most of the manosphere to accept the mathematical truths coming out, like the female IQ increase over men (when they take literally the same test). Hypergamy died in the last century. With love matches.

Shocker: Rich women don’t want gold diggers either

Note the sad MGTOW comments justifying their failure with women as the fault OF women and extolling Thai brides.

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/640467/Rich-decline-date-men-earn-less-good-looking-dating

They can’t read.

They surveyed rich women and tested for shallowness. The women weren’t shallow, they didn’t want a handsome man if he failed as a provider, as a man, knowing looks fade anyway.
Rich people are acutely aware of gold diggers, of course rich women were raised to avoid men with nothing to offer. (You didn’t earn your looks).

Salary is often a reliable proxy for intelligence. If you’re somewhat intelligent, you should be able to make more money than average. This isn’t hard to understand. Higher IQs contribute more to the economy. It’s a reliable indicator.

that's enough stop please karen will and grace

The only thing they proved is the importance of class. Idiotic Americans.
You don’t get to play out of your league as a man. How is that worth bragging about as a mark of superiority? Oh, these rich women would’ve rejected you for having nothing to offer while you coast on looks, aren’t they terrible? Women have a narrow window but not by much, one or two levels higher, tops.

Their Muh Hypergamy doesn’t apply when the woman is more valuable, does it, dipshits?
The manosphere hypergamy is not what the studies show, the true meaning of the term requires marriage, and the studies also show hypergamy doesn’t apply to the 21st century, numbers dropped like a rock. If hypergamy were this evil thing giving women all the power, you’d expect they’d know this. Are they happy? Never.

looking for a fuck to give loki thor 2

I’ve met happier feminists than these guys.
Now it’s just getting sad.

Video: Passive income is a con

A Get Rich Quick Scheme that assumes a super-high ROI by doing a little of something easy.

Think about it – the people pushing it? They’re selling themselves. They can’t do it either. They need you. What’s that? A Ponzi scheme.

The ebook bullshit is merely the latest example.

It’s like publishing – most books are terrible. Most books aren’t bestsellers, let alone classics.

If you don’t want to work at it, you’ll always be poor.

Some men could be born with a King’s ransom – and they’ll still piss it away and die poor.

Show me.

Thing is, if they’re not working, we’d never hear about them. If we hear about them, by default they must be working. Whether they ‘count’ it or not.

“Why should either two men live at the discretion of three, or three at the discretion of two. Both propositions are absurd from a reasonable point of view. If being a slave and owning a slave are both wrong relations, what difference does it make whether there are a million slave owners and one slave, or one slave owner and a million slaves? Do robbery and murder cease to be what the are if done by ninety-nine percent of the population?” ~ Auberon Herbert

The 1.54% Boomer Riche

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/27/number-of-millionaires-in-uk-rises-by-200000

One in 65 UK adults now a millionaire, latest figures show

snort lol laugh haha hmph derision yeah duh really uhuh mhmm princess bride

I wonder which generation this could be (mainly).

The number of millionaires in the UK has shot up by 41% over the past five years, with one in 65 adults now classed as having a seven-figure fortune thanks to booming house prices and stock market gains.

The stock market thing is usually a fluke, real estate is the prime moneymaker.

There are now 715,000 millionaires living in Britain compared with 508,000 in 2010, data from Barclays UK shows. Nearly half (48%) of all new millionaires since 2010 live outside London and the south-east.

The bank’s prosperity index found that Reading, Cambridge and Birmingham are the most affluent cities outside of London, and the east of England is the third most prosperous area.

Surging property prices and big returns in equity markets in recent years have combined with higher wages and employment rates to create more millionaires as the UK economy gets back on track.

It isn’t back on track but OK.

The research shows that every UK region is now more affluent than it was five years ago, with measures including household wealth, gross domestic product (GDP), exam results, charitable donations and entrepreneurship taken into account.

QE does that.
They mean NGOs, not charities. A lot of embezzlement.

According to the Office for National Statistics, the richest 10% of households own 44% of household wealth.

And which age group are they? Pray tell.

Akshaya Bhargava, chief executive of Barclays Wealth and Investment Management, said: “The UK is becoming more prosperous, with every region having grown in affluence since 2010. It is also encouraging to see that regions and cities are starting to close the gap with London in terms of prosperity, with the north-east, for example, seeing business growth rates behind only London.”

London and the south-east remain the most prosperous regions, and the capital boasts the most millionaires, up 48% in the past five years to 191,000 – more than the combined millionaire population of Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and northern England.

The east of England comes in third behind these two, as rising house prices push more wealthy Britons outside of London, with 23,000 more millionaires calling the eastern region their home.

Reading is listed second for prosperity in the UK, according to the index, with average earnings of £30,562. Growing numbers of entrepreneurs in the UK is also seen as a factor in increasing wealth, with Cambridge emerging as a startup hub and ranking third.

The north-east and Newcastle fall low on the prosperity index. But the study showed the highest rate of growth in millionaires was in the north-east and Wales, both up 50% since 2010. The study said northern regions “may be on the cusp of change, with the north-east leading the way”.

Despite the jump in wealthy Britons over the past five years, the research said growth in millionaires was expected to return to more normal levels over the long term, with a 9% increase in the UK expected by 2025, in line with GDP growth.

Almost like they brought in a new tax on BTL (buy to letters).

If we go back to before the Boomer panic of the Guardian, to  2011: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/feb/28/baby-boomers-secret-millionaires

The inadvertent burden baby boomers have bequeathed the young is sending Britain broke.

…Yet the accusation that boomers are protecting themselves at the expense of everyone else still stands, because relatively ordinary boomers will retire as millionaires, paid for by younger workers. Even the poorer over-50s need to recognise they are going to take out of society more than they put in….

PONNNNNNN-ZIIIIIIIIIIII.

ugh why no please stop god kill me now rdj tony stark

Among other resources;

http://www.nevermindthebuspass.com/wealth/baby-boomers-drive-rise-of-one-in-10-millionaire-households/

One British household in every 10 now has total assets exceeding £1m, according to a new book based on work at the London School of Economics published last week

Wealth in the UK crunched the findings from a comprehensive official survey that took place between 2008 and 2010, and found that 10% of households had total wealth of £967,200 or more….

…As lead author Professor John Hills explains: “It is not that there are millions of people with millions of pounds in the bank, but rather that London property prices and – for those lucky professionals who retain them – final salary pensions have quietly made technical millionaires out of many who would only consider themselves as solidly middle-class”….

i hope you fucking choke love heartbreak

…In addition, over-55s accounted for most of the 2.5m ‘millionaire households’, having benefited in particular from rising house prices. But there’s also a great wealth disparity among households in this age group….

Yet about 1 in 10 of those still managed to fail. Fail to save. Ever. Because magic money.

…The top 10pc in that age group own assets worth more than £1.46m, said Prof Hills, and the typical household had wealth of £431,000…..

…He also warns against the complacent temptation to regard the great surge in wealth at the top end as a “purely paper” phenomenon, arguing instead that it will have implications for social mobility for a long time to come…

translation: Gen Y are fucked.

http://www.if.org.uk/archives/2762/pensioner-millionaires-in-the-uk-identifying-the-numbers

The members of Britain’s baby boomer generation who are just starting to enter retirement have been called “the richest generation in history”. Yet, to a large extent, the British welfare state still treats age as a proxy for need, transferring large amounts of public money to all pensioners in the form of universal benefits, regardless of how wealthy they are.

Old goats for votes.

In order to help further the debate surrounding how Britain’s welfare state should be reformed as the population ages, IF undertook this study to discover how many members of the older generation live in households that have assets of more than £1 million, using data from the 2008/10 Household Wealth and Assets Survey.

The author estimates that in 2011, there were approximately 1.9 million over-60s living in households with asset wealth greater than £1 million, 1 million of whom were over-65 (above state pension age for both males and females). This finding should lead to increased debate about how the British welfare state treats pensioners who have large reserves of private asset wealth, and whether benefits should the distributed according to need rather than age.

Remember the Communist mantra?

no do not want go away displeased

…Pattern? What pattern?

In case you think I’m doom-mongering for Gen Y (Gen X got a mixed bag): http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3108441/Generation-Y-left-pick-6trillion-tab-Report-warns-children-born-1980-2000-face-apocalyptic-levels-debt-Government-spending.html

It begins (from this June);

Younger people are being left with ‘apocalyptic’ levels of debt, a report warns today.

I know the feel, bro

So-called Generation Y, born between 1980 and 2000, will be forced to pick up the bill for decades of Government over-spending, it is claimed.

*throws K-selection confetti*

Analysis by the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS) accused baby-boomers of making unfunded promises on pensions and benefits and then leaving their children to pick up the bill.

Surges of hormones make Hulk angry

Coupled with unaffordable housing, university debts, poor pensions and a ‘rapidly retreating state pension age’, Generation Y now faces ‘a quality of life below that of their parents’.

The CPS accused politicians of ‘fawning over the baby-boomers and older pensioners’ as they were more inclined to vote. The think-tank says the state’s liabilities – including ‘off the books’ spending commitments – is £6trillion, or £221,000 per household.

In the report, Tory peer Lord Holmes of Richmond said people in their twenties and early thirties faced ‘a struggle not experienced by previous generations’ as they had been left to pick up ‘the tab’.

He said: ‘Why should you suffer a standard of living lower than your parents?’.

The think-tank said overall liabilities had risen by hundreds of millions in the last five years alone – despite the country supposedly living in an age of austerity.

The CPS said the bill would be picked up by today’s young people, so-called Generation Y.

Their parents and the so-called baby boomer generation born after the war have been protected by politicians unwilling to upset older generations who are more likely to vote.

…In a devastating analysis, the report’s author, Michael Johnson, says: ‘Baby-boomers have become masters at perpetrating inter-generational injustice, by making vast unfunded promises to themselves, notably in respect of pensions.

 I love this suit and everything about this demeanour