It’s hilarious how well this fits.
It’s hilarious how well this fits.
He recently denounced his PUA status actually, because he senses the winds of K-shift blowing (see all the immigration articles?), he’s trying to distance himself from his own degeneracy. It’s like the Little Red Hen, or the Ant and the Grasshopper, don’t let him swoop in near the finish line and take your hard-earned belongings. His largely brown followers (most PUA is non-white) will come right in after him and trash the place like Cologne on New Year’s. Too soon? Well that’s what happens when you let them in, they can’t run their own countries or even be men and defend them, why do you think they’re worthy enough to walk amongst you? Why do you let them walk right in and call it home? After the EU mess, really?
He’s trying to sweep his PUA stuff under the rug to pass for respectable. He may be non-PC, but that doesn’t make him correct, nor Right wing, and never respectable. The way he conducts himself demonstrates this much. He’s a far-left liberal (who refuses to give his ‘notch count’ btw, white women as tokens) based on his sexual history (which you cannot hide or lie about) who sees an opportunity to make a quick buck and he’ll say whatever he thinks you wanna hear to do it.
Roosh is trying to cuck the Right wing and traditional ideas.
“Presumably, he’s embraced far-right ideas because it’s hip right now to do so. [DS: YES] He obviously isn’t a White nationalist, because he isn’t White. He also promotes weird serial-sex behavior which doesn’t really fit with a traditional society, at all.” [it poisons it]
“Regarding all these arguments about “should we support Roosh????”
“no, you obviously shouldn’t support a Moslem guy who promotes pointless serial-sex (even if he is apparently promoting that less than he used to) and whichever other weirdness. If he’s putting out good material, fine. Just say “some of this material is good, but I don’t support the man overall.”
You’re only as strong as your weakest link. If you drop the bar for him to step over (that’s how low it’ll need to be), you’re done. Once you say a brown Muslim opportunist liar can boss native White Europeans around and tell them what’s masculine and how to run the West, it’s over. You’ve been cucked. Install the Caliphate he clearly wants already, praising Islam when he happily lives in all the places it’s NOT. Remember taqiyya. He’s signalling to you guys, it’s false. If he really believed that stuff, he’d have been practicing it his entire life. You should expel him from Europe at least and limit the damage his ilk are doing, it’s antisocial predation at best and rape/coercive sex jihad at worst. He’s doing the same things as the rapefugees, advocating the same things (using white women as free whores), we need to send a strong defensive message: Europe is not your brothel.
He’s like that obnoxious fence-sitter who tries to say they’re socially liberal but economically conservative. No, you can’t play both sides in politics, you have to choose. He profits for a living from the worst dregs of society, he repeatedly states how he’s proud of it and he should be ashamed of it (if he truly leaned rightward). Instead, he’s trying to expand and profit from the Right too. He’s a con artist. Wake up, people.
He wants to play both sides, don’t let him.
n.b. Men aren’t animals, they can no more excuse their behaviour with ‘muh evolution’ (which he doesn’t believe in) than women theirs. In fact, for most of history, women were thought to be the more libidinous sex and the Bible supports this so if you maintain that pseudologic, sluts are A-OK and should be encouraged because naturalistic fallacy.
Don’t be taken in by this worm, you don’t need his followers, they know where we are and they don’t read us.
He doesn’t even have that much support anyway, most people hate-read him. If those meetings had gone ahead, a few dozen might’ve showed up, maybe a few hundred. And they’re all low-status plebs to turn to his twisted Self Help in the first place (lie about your STDs, refuse to wear a condom, get her blackout drunk and force her=called LMR in PUA lingo). They’re just as vindictive toward Patriarchs (they see as spoiling their entitled fun blocking access to ‘their’ women and making up law to protect women from harm) as they are to women (even and especially the ones who don’t sleep around, who they still defame by calling them sluts and whores).
If you’re a traditional person considering sympathy for such a beast, look no further than the things he has actually written, completely seriously. Refuses to retract. Note the things he doesn’t do, like removing his PUA books from sale if he’s really over it when he’s doing the equivalent of throwing his hands up saying I’m not a PUA! I just practice it, teach it and have literally written the books on it! I’m not a rapist! I just wrote an article with that literal title and teach men not to take No for an answer!
Goddamn it people, look, I did the research for you.
We haven’t even begun on the cosmetic surgery to pass for more White. That’s one hell of a honker.
If you thought I was exaggerating about the anti-white racism and active profiling, here’s a taster.
How dare he badmouth another race like that, especially one he is so eager to exploit. How is that NOT racist? Note, to escape these terrible white devils, he went… to Europe.
Read the degenerate post where I mostly quote him. It’s so, so much worse. I wanted to throw up.
Simple test: will he do something non-profit? No money, no attention? Never in a million years. It’s all about him, he’s using you.
He seems to be the type to keep a spreadsheet of targets and their attributes. We know he deliberately targets women based on their race, he seeks out White women specifically and that’s why he keeps living among us in Europe. Worse, he’s teaching others to do the same.
A far better metric of his ‘success’ with women would be to ask for Total Notch Count and Total Amount Expended Obtaining It.
Is the average cheaper than a hooker?
I mean, this is how calculating he is about it. Like a predator.
For another interesting article see:
It’s been said elsewhere in far more eloquent prose that feminism is an ugly girl’s excuse. Roosh and his PUA fuckboys are selling the same delusion to ugly or loser males. A man needs a woman like a fish needs a bicycle.
The more you dig on him, the worse it gets. Moving into the realm of speculation here but I wouldn’t be shocked.
This post apparently outs Roosh V as a sex tourist and there are other posts discussing the various evidence. There are several other allegations he has never publicly denounced, in fact I’ve never heard of them before e.g. “He is also on several public security lists in USA. There are suspicions he might be engaging in more serious stuff like pedophile.” I find it strange he has never addressed these, you’d think he’d bring that up?
It’s easy to have a dig at SF’s expense (many people do) but it’s just a site, less edgy than the chans, and considering how much the SJWs hate them, how much worse must this aged likely-diseased slut be?
They get this right, the reason everyone wants a European: “Europeans are cute because men selected cute women and women selected handsome men.” The Ice Age was very good for us.
Why does the Left keep putting the Right on the defensive?
reject your heathens and we won’t accept you
Why do we allow them to claim moral authority?
Neither wing should like one another, that’s the purpose of an adversarial system.
moderates only (who stand for nothing) is anti-democratic
What is behind the Rise of the Cuck?
Turns out this has a name: the salami tactic. Rhetorically cutting their todger off.
And the Left are acting like Nazis.
Literally. That’s what the Nazis did. The people with Worker’s Party in their name.
The term is also known as a “piecemeal strategy“, as used by the Nazi Party (which preferred the term Gleichschaltung) to achieve absolute power in Germany in the early months of 1933. First, there was the Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933, which rattled the German population and led to the Reichstag Fire Decree, which suspended many civil liberties and outlawed the Communist Party and the Social Democrats.
Since the Left consider this acceptable in the 21st century, if the Right chooses to pursue this course in kind, there is no ethical issue. What’s good for the goose…
Any excuse to use this gif.
-is not a new idea.
I got a bloopity-bloop (notification) on an AC post where I gently chided him for misinterpreting the PC HQ that is the UK. What would I know, after all, I only live here.
Lookie who likes this idea;
However, if you look hyar;
It isn’t even a novel idea on this very blog, and I’m happy to admit I’m half-arsing it. I colloquially used it in June.
I’m hardly having another Cassandra moment.
It’s been going round for ages, and predates the internet.
The concept No enemies to the Left? That was stolen from conservatives back when they ran academia. You know, when it had a prestigious reputation and wasn’t a total scam? To protect papers from infiltration in the editing process. I heard this in confidence so I can’t source it [personal correspondence] but you’re welcome. If anybody can find a source willing to go on record please divulge.
p.s. Sorry if I have to keep explaining ‘my’ ideas but they’re gaining traction elsewhere and I can’t stand misinformation.
As Anonymous Conservative said;
Sit by the river long enough, and the bodies of your enemies will float by. The key will be Conservatives vowing to never help any liberal survive the mess they have created, or fight the monsters they have previously supported. They are not our people, they are our enemies. And they will deserve everything they will get.
This needs to become a meme among the right.
Half the nonsense they pull, they do it because they assume they can always come crying to us, false patriotism in hand, when it backfires on them. We must make our position clear – you have Othered yourself from the nation, we owe you nothing.
I can see the point. I think this is r-type low-IQ low/no Need for Cognition dominance as culture panders to the lowest denominator who is crucially – easily parted with their credit cards. When the credit tap dries up, we’ll see a flip, in my estimation. Salesmen go where the money is. In a monetary vacuum, nobody looks up to these people. Adverts are a dream that consumer buys into. They matter. They have importance. There are things catered to them, after all. Increasingly, they shape their identity around what they are told is valuable about their ‘demo’ by the master puppeteers.
However, the use of degenerate in Europe refers to primarily sexual or rarely, other form of antisocial abuse with traumatic shockwaves to surrounding societal structures (mostly drugs, because the rush and risk is similar to sex).
These people complain when what society said would happen, does. The classic routes worked where none of the others did, it’s almost-Darwinian societal structure selection. See many atheist countries lately? Yet these individuals are ignorant of history and think their trendy opinions will lead them right forever. When they’re inevitably ruined, as society warned them from childhood they would be, they expect everyone else to play parent and clean up their mess. Bailouts. Everywhere. For adults. They complain they are oppressed and nobody listens to them whine. – Probably ‘cos they know they can’t talk you out of being stupid, it’s a lifelong condition. This is the rationale behind that Law of Power on the ‘unlucky’. The same faulty decision-making will fell you too, if such is the cause of their woe.
Take advice from a suicide on life? Sure, what’s the worst that could happen? They’re naive and destructive, a fatal combination in ANY OTHER SOCIETY IN HUMAN HISTORY.
They failed to grow up and each failure thereafter compounds their issues. Leave them be. The issue is assuming everyone is an expert for having an opinion. Nope, most opinion (has a right to exist but) is irrelevant beyond its dwelling place because it fails basic reality checks. They are marked by their ingratitude to people who humour them, and play parent, who tell them the truth. You don’t want to behave, you don’t want the truth, what do you want? ~ it is sensible to ask. To be God. A life with one half cut out. Rights and no responsibilities. Highs and no lows. These people are an insult to children, they may in future count as a form of antisocial retardation; the ignorance of the laws of physics applied to social beings, of the conflict between biology and agency, of chemistry applied to their under-developed brains. They are arrogant enough to believe they are exempt from the rule of the Universe they inhabit. There is no such thing as morality, there is no objective Universe. If you ask, they believe this. They may as well live in a social media cave (Plato) and be done with it. These people would honestly do better in an asylum than out in the harsh realities of a world they dispute to exist. If we lived out in space, we’d shoot these people out of the airlock for sport. They are a waste of resources and it’s a cosmic joke they support all abortion. A temporary boon in global fertility off the back of the tireless noble Victorian productivity (stone-dead two productive generations later, 1901-1961) they derisively mock allowed them an existential hurrah they have wasted for others before the next Malthusian population-levelling event pops up and takes them down into the sinking abyss of genetic irrelevance, the human equivalent of the Dodo. I laugh at these people, for what else is there to do? The village idiots are running the show, may as well enjoy it. We may not see the men in white coats approach them from the corner of our vision but trust, their time is approaching. As George Carlin said, we’re circling the drain, and things pick up speed as we near the end of this era, as we’ve seen in the past year or two. We are the spectators who live in interesting times.
Morality is a slippery slope, which isn’t a fallacy at all when applied to realpolitik, covered with a shiny hard plastic layer of Doublespeak and called a “trend” instead.
Quintus. I’ll start off with a question that many of our readers may have thought about. Do you believe men are facing a spiritual crisis today? If so, why?
C.P. Yes. Crisis is a Greek word, meaning “judgment.” It is the nature of Truth, that to come in contact with it is to face judgment; it is therefore no surprise to me, that our judgment rises to the level of a crisis, precisely when “non-judgmentalism” has become our only “truth.” The underlying sickness, is the heresy of “modernism,” (sometimes called “liberalism”), which, boiled down to its very nub, is the irrational assertion of autonomy via absolute, abstract “rights,” while one denies, doubts or despairs of knowing the necessary causes of rights’ existence.
“The modernist cares not whether something is Right and True; one only needs the “right” to do something without regard to what is Right and True. The core irrationality is to deny the Right in the name of “rights,” and even to believe that “rights” exist, if there is nothing Right. The modernist society inevitably develops irrationally, in accord with its premises.” ……………….
Note the frame control here.
Most of the people on the Right I know are not at all religious (including moi).
The frame is a dismissal on the basis of ‘silly religion’, neoatheist’s battlecry.
Why this focus?
They refuse to acknowledge there could be any real objection to Leftist policies aside from – God said so.
Perhaps looking in a long view will make it clearer.
It used to be the Right with control. Then the Left rallied and bitched (with no bite) and the Right ran away scared because they feared those labels, thinking they could be backed up.
Now the Left have had control for many decades. The Right are rallying, because they no longer fear those labels. It cannot get worse for them, they are like a domestic abuse victim finally standing up for themselves. They are beginning to see if they stand their ground (as largely K types to the Left’s r) the progressives are such weaklings they’ll cry all the way home. Even their politicians.
This is good news.
Excellent. Except we (GB) already live under socialism. Terrible graphic by moi.
Explained well by the Captain. Crony capitalism, not true capitalism, is somewhere in the light blue region. Statism is the push leftward. Libertarianism pushes rightward.
Nevertheless, dat subtitle: “Without a smaller state, decline is inevitable” Have they been reading me?