Self-reliant people more satisfied in life

Shocker.

https://www.livescience.com/63094-conservative-meaning-of-life.html

Meaning is personal to each of us. However, a new study published June 15 in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science suggests that some people might be better at finding that meaning than others — and the difference may come down to politics.

According to the study, which compiled survey results from more than 50,000 participants in 16 countries, people who identified as political conservatives were more likely to find meaning and satisfaction in their lives than liberals were.

Political conservatives tend to be happier than liberals, a finding that has been labeled the ‘happiness gap’ in media reporting,” a team of psychologists from the University of Southern California (USC) wrote in the new paper. “One conservative commentator even described it as ‘niftily self-reinforcing; it depresses liberals.'”

 Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.

Historical r/K-like waves in the economy

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-28/approaching-winter-super-cycle-has-turned

Just don’t chart the migration habits of a certain group.

Reminds me of biohistory.

The do-gooders, by “feeding the world”, have killed everyone else.

The world cannot slave to feed Asia and Africa. It is impossible.

Atheist divorce risk discussion

Not a study, discusses a study of scientism.

http://atheismexposed.tripod.com/atheists_divorce.htm

They stated in the press 21% risk, it was actually 37%.

Let’s start with the actual statistics. Was George Barna quoted correctly? We have tried to locate the original stats from the Barna site, and this is what we found:

Achtually. ~lisping~

You can understand why atheists and agnostics might have a high rate of divorce, since they are less likely to believe in concepts such as sin, absolute moral truth and judgment. Yet the survey found that the percentage of atheists and agnostics who have been married and divorced is 37% – (Emphasis mine) very similar to the numbers for the born again population.[3]

You go by if they’ve EVER been divorced, that’s how divorce risk works.

There isn’t a freebie.

“the percentage of atheists and agnostics

who have been married and divorced is 37% -“

I’d also like to see cause, including accusations of infidelity.

Are atheist spouses (no such thing logically) more likely to break their vows to a God they think is a joke?

A survey isn’t really a study, like poll data isn’t a vote, and as we can see, the number crunching sucks.

I’d also need to see the pair combinations and specific divorce risks:

atheist/Jew, atheist/Muslim, atheist/Christian, atheist/atheist.

If they’re a risk to themselves, that would be really damning, they can’t blame religion.

Marriage is religious so the fact they haven’t really studied this topic is indicative.

Barna did not include this enlightening fact in his research. Thus, if 21% of atheists divorce after marriage, and 45 % break up once or more before marriage, what we have is the astounding rate of about 66% of atheist couples experiencing “at least” one break up. If, however, the number is 37%, then we have a shocking figure of 82%. How is that for success in relationships?

82%

dissolving “committed unions”

What needs mentioning is the fact that many atheists do not cohabit as a prelude to marriage. They in fact see cohabitation as “equivalent” to any marriage relationship. Therefore, their cohabitation break ups are to be seen as the end of what was to be a committed relationship. These break ups were not included in the Barna research, thus giving an incomplete picture of the true state of relationships among atheist couples.

yep, should count

especially in America with the idiocy of “common law marriage”

so it legally counts

It should also be stressed that, unlike what atheist propagandists preach on the Internet, it is a well established fact that people who live common law before marriage have a greater, not lesser chance of divorce than couples who don’t live common law. Thus, given the fact that atheists’ cohabitations rates are 51%, it is quite possible that their divorce rates are actually higher than the 37% mentioned by Barna.

Maybe they’re into polygamy (cucking) because they’re physically incapable of monogamy?

We’d also need a follow-up study after a marriage/divorce risk one, on MRI neurological proof of pair bonding structures and ability in religions + atheists.

It would be the KO.

This study could be done.

Breakthroughs in the burgeoning field of neuroscience explain the impact of sex on the developing brains of adolescents and young adults. Through scientific data put in layman’s terms, this book demonstrates that:

  • Sexual activity releases chemicals in the brain, creating emotional bonds between partners.
  • Breaking these bonds can cause depression and make it harder to bond with someone else in the future.
  • Chemicals released in the brain during sex can become addictive.
  • The human brain is not fully developed until a person reaches their mid-20s. Until then, it is harder to make wise relationship decisions.

Historically, people waited until their 20s to marry. Men and women, it also avoided production of too many children from teen marriage and maternal death from biological prematurity.

Source on that:

Laslett: The World we have Lost

Parents and others who care about young people now have the facts to steer them away from making life-changing mistakes, and lead them toward reaching their full potential.

This book will help parents and singles understand that “safe sex” isn’t safe at all; that even if they are protected against STDs and pregnancy, they are still hurting themselves and their partner.

Connect neurological pair bonding impairment to sexual partner total (oral counts) and it’s over for SJWs. That would logically correlate to psychiatric complaints and other poor life outcomes.

https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism_and_marriage

“According to a Washington Post article, “According to calculations based on the American Religious Identification Survey of 2001, people who had been in mixed-religion marriages were three times more likely to be divorced or separated than those who were in same-religion marriages.” [17] Therefore, it would not be surprising if atheist/theist marriages also have increased marital friction and higher rates of divorce since these two worldviews are so different.”

Only makes sense with r/K

http://theoatmeal.com/comics/believe

I wasn’t bristling at all. If it’s true, my incredulity wouldn’t matter whatsoever.

“I find that hard to believe” – faux skeptic incredulity, the worst kind.

Now do one line of posts that offends Democrats. IQ? Debt, GDP? RacexCrime?

I wish they did a series of studies measuring the blood pressure (stress) of different political factions when exposed to counterarguments. Who would be most triggered… and least?

We have something close, however. Long live Haidt!

ACHTUALLY, Conservatives understand the moral reasoning of the Left, but they don’t understands ours (they can’t explain it back).

Haidt: Conservatives Understand Liberals Better Than Liberals Understand Conservatives

When I speak to liberal audiences about the three “binding” foundations – Loyalty, Authority, Sanctity – I find that many in the audience don’t just fail to resonate; they actively reject these concerns as immoral. Loyalty to a group shrinks the moral circle; it is the basis of racism and exclusion, they say. Authority is oppression. Sanctity is religious mumbo-jumbo whose only function is to suppress female sexuality and justify homophobia.”

Bigots project.

Most amusing, they lie about the definition of bigot.

To prove my Kredentials:

Loyalty – the real Social Justice.  (Future)

Authority – competence and investment. (Present)

Sanctity – protection, preservation and value. (History)

The Left’s concerns are childish by comparison. Those values build societies. The Left cannot live in a civilization unless the hard work was done first by workers with those values. It does not belong to them to give away by their own admission (no loyalty, no ingroup preference, no ingroup, nothing owed/received). The modern Left is not the worker, it is the party of the petit bourgeois. That is why it dies. It died with the 20th century that tested it.

Left wing ideology has murdered hundreds of millions of people (Little Black Book of Communism). Social engineering was a tyrannical abuse of human rights e.g. the multicultural experiment. Slavery continues as trafficking and odious debt. Are most pedophiles left or right wing? Guess who’s on the “right side of history”?

We’re called right, we are right and in this century, we’ll be proven right.

If the Left won’t kill you in the womb, they’ll kill you with debt for their charity fun.

You’re free to celebrate your own genocide.