What got me interested in the longevity of society?

I was obsessed with the question, why did Rome fall, why did Romans fail?

It fell for three reasons and failed for one. It fell because of the fractional reserve ‘fiat’ slavery that ensnared everybody, the decadence of the patrician classes trickling down via moral decline to full degeneracy of society and solar-incited crop failures (fed an army but mostly women, children aka the future). The Empire failed because of the People, they were no longer a People, homogeneously, by inviting their former slaves, who doubtless believed they were Roman citizens too (magic dirt), and breeding with them, the composition of the Roman people became weak and remains weak to this day. Otherwise they’d have bounced back, the sins of the father, onto the son. Once water has been sullied, its original purity is lost. Empires fail when they take slaves instead of slaying the conquered, that communist laziness. Think about it, you’re inviting a known (pissed-off) enemy back home to influence your future. Rome was literally polluted with the blood of losers, a society which initially prized itself on strength, vigour and bloodlines. Their dysgenic dicks led to their demise, one family at a time. They enabled spoiled sons and eventually lose their fortunes.
Shortly after my research, I discovered all Empires fail by the same pattern.
Look for wheat yields, if you want. Europe has the best records. The Middle Ages drop in wheat really revolved around Renaissance degeneracy. Read r/k into it, maybe biohistory or HBD but it’s all out there.

It’s WIKI TIER.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_ancient_Rome
“The final way a slave could be obtained was through birth: if a female slave gave birth to a child, that child became property of the slave’s owner. Extramarital relations with women who were not citizens was not considered to be adultery under Roman law (and Roman wives were expected to tolerate such behavior), so there was no legal or moral impediment to having children being fathered by a slave’s owner or overseer.”
They preferentially bred with their slaves. I’m sure such anti-Christian adultery and random heirs running around caused no problems, least of all accidental incest. Christianity came too late to save them. #badum-ttssh

Screwing their ‘slaves’ emboldened them, the sexual validation made them consider themselves equals, as nothing else does:

“Land owners also faced problems with slave rebellions at times.”

no shit?

“In addition to invasions by Carthaginians and Celtic tribes, slaves rebellions and civil wars which were repeatedly fought on Italian soil all contributed to the destruction of traditional agricultural holdings

Civil war? What changed? Except the population. And its new savage composition.

Don’t open that door.

“Also, as Rome’s agriculture declined, people now judged others by their wealth rather than their character.”

Materialism and hook-ups because it takes two to Devil’s tango. Every time men drop the ball of leading society as a moral authority, they blame women. Um. Nah. Stop fucking cheap pussy. It brings down Empires.

And the yuck factor of what certain modern men are willing to sleep with (manjaw mongrel mystery meat types) is subconsciously putting off white women from considering wanting kids with them. You see pics of their “ex” and go, ew no. All women do this. All races do this. You could actually do a study on this, if he shows a pic of a same-race girl or other, odds of wanting another date? Nobody’s jealous, it’s disgust.

https://www.washington.edu/news/2016/08/17/study-finds-bias-disgust-toward-mixed-race-couples/

Participants responded faster to images of same-race couples and selected them more often for inclusion in the study. More significantly, Skinner said, participants showed higher levels of activation in the insula — an area of the brain routinely implicated in the perception and experience of disgust — while viewing images of interracial couples.

“That indicates that viewing images of interracial couples evokes disgust at a neural level,” Skinner said.

Nobody’s jealous of the mud sharks and rice cookers. Like nobody is jealous of fat girl tits.

Sure, that one part is nice but…. at what cost?

The guys who brag about their exotic exes end up lonely for a reason. High flight risk. Not to mention shitty taste. Likely poor parental skills. Low racial loyalty – including to their own kids. Then the fact mixers are by default lower quality to the point they can’t ‘make it’ with their own. Just… no. Women would literally rather buy a tiny handbag dog than breed with a weeb, for the most common example you can ask as a socially acceptable question at the bar and get away with. As a cost/benefit analysis, it just isn’t worth it. Women contribute more to their existing family’s survival with relatives than squandering personal resources on inferior genetics, men do not get this. They assume all women have baby rabies. Nope. Women filter to keep the species somewhat intact, the debt system has made the low quality women bolder. And this applies across the races between women, actually, any out-group involvement. I guess it’s a K motivator among women for the tribe’s collective gain. To reject the disloyal genetics plus the risk of outer diseases. I’d be willing to bet money in a study the girlfriends of such weebs would be more likely to abort his baby than average, more willing. I’d guess her oxytocin with him is also lower. Whether or not she’s the same race as him.

https://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.com/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html

“In evolutionary terms, one could argue that mixed-race marriages are maladaptive in that they reduce a person’s overall genetic fitness – i.e. passing on copies of one’s own genes.  In a multiracial marriage or relationship, one is showing altruism toward a partner who shares fewer genes than a co-ethnic would share.  A parent will also share fewer genes with a multiracial child than with a same-race child.”

Instincts evolved for a reason. Genetic distance means white people always lose, mathematically, as the recessive race. I’ve posted about it before. White parents of mixed kids are less than half related to them, that’s why non-whites want us. The white party’s cucking themselves. If you could fill up a soda cup in a bigger or smaller size, you’d go for the best deal for you. Genetically, they can pass more on with a white partner as their vessel. The white parent’s unique traits are lost by recombination/mutation, dilution of mixing per se plus regression to the mean e.g. with iq. That’s also why supermodels have plain or fugly kids or parents.

Blaming mixed people for their health problems is bloody evil e.g. shaming mixed blacks in America for a “bad diet” predisposing them to heart conditions, outsized to the common population. Turns out a lot of the white guys raping their slaves had awful cardiac health.

This is why patriarchy’s approach to rape claims is “hang ’em high”. The law must be a deterrent and since their intention is to extend their lifespan by breeding without masculine commitment, a death penalty of rapists is just.

Men acting/bluffing like they’re morally better for being sexually weaker is just sad.

https://speedywordz.blogspot.com/2015/12/cut-your-coat-according-to-your-cloth.html

Control the rest of the world and still, if you cannot control yourself it won’t matter, no respect.

A little more on the agri page:

Roman agricultural practices may have contributed to soil depletion throughout the Roman world.”

The same rules apply elsewhere.

If you look at the British Empire, it was the foundation of globalism. Sorry but… yeah. We got too cocky and that’s why we fed them. We fed the bear.

White saviour became white martyr. Depicting Jesus as white was a mistake.

Culturally, the degeneracy started by Victorian hypocrites.

All the Victorian brothels enabled by weak priests, cheating judges and stupid wives (enjoy your syphilitic dead baby, remarkably preserved in its jar to this day) instigated the cultural norm of sexual deviance looooong before the 1960s.

The wages of sin are death.

Stop slutting.

Reject usury.

This isn’t hard.

The atomised late Roman

Does Stoicism Extinguish the Fire of Life?

An honor culture can only function in a society in which there is a shared code — clear rules, standards, and expectations for interaction and engagementand within a closed community of equals. But as the Roman Republic transformed into a sprawling, porous, far-flung empire, its society became increasingly large, complex, and diverse, and “The citizen of Rome became a citizen of the world,” this common, level playing field disintegrated.

In an honor culture, you can only be insulted by someone you consider an equal. But in Roman society, discerning who deserved this level of respect, and whose slights to take seriously, became increasing difficult and unclear. If someone possessed a different set of values, was a citizen still honor-bound to care what they thought?

relativism

Early Romans had shared rules of engagement — boundaries that checked their competitions and kept them civil. In the greater chaos of the empire, in the absence of shared norms, citizens made the rules up as they went. It was every man for himself. In fact, the less a man cared about honor, the more unable he was to be shamed, the more strategic advantage he gained. Early Romans had not played to win, but for the sake of engaging in a good fight; now, citizens were prepared to win at any cost.

cucks
the noble loser
the traitor
saving face
political gain > spiritual

Romans thus came to see contests as unequal and destructive. Those who engaged in competitions under the old assumption of participating on a level playing field, found instead that the odds were stacked, and this gap between expectation and reality engendered great bitterness. As did the fact that it seemed more and more men began receiving commendations, laurels of honor, who hadn’t actually earned them.

nepotism
favouritism
no meritocracy or scant

As a result, Romans became disillusioned and began to withdraw from the contest, from active engagement with their fellow citizens and civic life. “When competition was insupportable, then paralysis, the desire to hide, and the desire to be insensitive and autonomous became widespread cultural phenomena. With the loss of the good contest and the rules that framed it, cold, callous, brazen shamelessness became a cure for shame.”

apathy
nihilism
hopelesssness (a sin if you check with Catholics, despair)
self-sabotage
atomisation
casualisation
“individualism” ego rationalisation, vanity (good for self and appearance’s sake, not for thede)
mentacide

“Shamelessness” for the Romans did not necessarily mean, as it does for us, to be unvirtuous, but rather to literally be incapable of being shamed. That is, the shameless care nothing for what others think of them.

dullards
spiritually vapid celebrities or role models

It always starts with the men doesn’t it?

Weak personal morals/actions of men, appeal to exception and excuses, weak moral authority > no honour > loss of respect to other men and all women, no social power, nobody listens. The levy breaks, the dam bursts. “If it’s okay when they do, why not me?” Monkey see, monkey do. Children don’t listen what you say, they witness you.

A hierarchy of modern men would rank far below late Romans, but how often do they virtue signal against men who’d at least risked death in battle? Like, STFU. They could build houses and fires. They were useful. Women hate gammas for the fake signals like that. The snarky “I’m so much better” – then DO something, DO anything useful!

Fathers should stick around to tell their sons this, it isn’t women’s business and we resent this novel pressure to kinda ‘mansplain’ to boys what they should already know as adults – STANDARDS.

Women who complain about the manchild are 100% right, there shouldn’t be a word! Nor mantrum! We shouldn’t understand what it means nor see it!

While today we tend to admire this kind of radical indifference to public opinion, to the Romans unbounded autonomy was the mark of a man whose energy had been drained, whose being had been destroyed;

libertarians are lazy, in practice

excuses to do less, altogether

as Cicero put it: “To take no heed of what other people think of you is the part not only of an arrogant man but, to be sure, of a dissolutus.” How could someone who remained unmoved even in the face of legitimate criticism, who refused to be ashamed even when confronted with their culpability, ever be trusted?

the shameless man, the attention-seeking psychopaths as role models based on short-term results

high time pref parasitism on society

[see Hare’s work]

Still, even Cicero, though himself a political leader, was sympathetic to the impulse to become callously disengaged, rhetorically asking, “what spirit trained in these times, ought not to become insensitive?” Elsewhere he quotes a line of Euripides: “If this mournful day were the first to dawn for me, had I not long sailed in such a sea of troubles, then there would be reason for anguish like that felt by a colt when the reins are first imposed and he bridles at the first touch of the bit. But now, broken by miseries, I am numb.”

it isn’t an excuse

it’s egocentric to assume the world must care about your trivial problems or bow to your whims, princess

Social media has even made men princesses who “need” their coffee and “need” a chest wax and “need” to take a selfie. Is all that really a need or are you an entitled brat?

Hollywood tells us stuff magically happens. That’s why people pay – to see the FICTION.

Reality doesn’t allow escapism but genetic suicide comes close. Moral self-destruction.

The Bible warns about disconnection of the spirit, it’s the ideal condition the Devil wants, all you have left is the animal body, hedonism. There’s no judgement or conscience or sense of higher things, basically Nietzsche’s abyss wasn’t death, it was hedonism. It leads to excuses for oneself – a form of moral relativism.

In this self-imposed withdrawal and “the collapse of conditions for healthy competition in ancient Rome . .  . various strategies [had to be] devised by the Romans for creating a new emotional economy and redefining their spirit.” Said another way, “With the loss of the rules and conditions of the good contest, the entire language of honor ‘imploded’ and had to be ‘reconstructed.’”

oh yay critical theory

This reconstruction process would involve nothing less than a complete inversion of values, and produce multiple radiating effects on Roman society.

pride from shame
free from diseased
individual from alone

Honor centered around control, constraint, consistency; the ideal man becomes he who is poised, tranquil, disengaged. The passive values were elevated above the active.

Good for a society of strong defences, death for a society of weak ones, permitting invasion for shekels.

Virtue < Virtue signal

e.g.

I can be a slut, if I criticize sluts.

Moral hypocrisy, hallmark of degeneracy. The bottom of honour’s barrel. Drunken chambering.

Soldier becomes selfish slutty peacock, basically. It’s Calhoun but IRL. Needn’t be slutty with the opposite sex either, people forget that. The homosexuality rates are an outcrop of this noxious social weed where we don’t expect successful men to marry faithfully.

Shame is GOOD and JUST and NECESSARY for civilization.

“judge not lest ye be judged” refers to using the same societal standard for the entire society i.e. NO exceptions based on class, wealth, sob story etc etc

It does NOT say “never judge” – notice that?

Double standards are the first weakness e.g. cheating in sports.

Read the rest yourself, it’s jarring.

Fifth, as Romans collectively withdrew from participating in a contest culture, they ironically began to lionize the individual who continued to play the game, and did so with a “winner-take-all” disregard for the old rules. The “man not prepared to lose” was idolized.

Instead of competition being something in which every average citizen took part, the masses mounted the bleachers, to cheer on, and live vicariously through, the few “gladiators” still in the arena. As spectators, they both worried over and felt excited by the rise of would-be tyrants who were willing to crush anyone who stood in their way; the thrill of the cult of victory,

infantilising the criminal

siding with the anti-hero

sports substitute for war

idolatry cult – celebrity role models

Cult of voyeurism, we even have that with fucking now.

There was a rarely mentioned line in Fight Club, “this isn’t love, it’s sports-fucking”.

That’s it, right there. That is the essence of the degenerate. The sick men who look up to the unreal Tyler ignore the fact it’s satire, it’s mocking them. But they are shameless. They make all sacred things worldly.

Teenagers are brainwashed but anyone older who views it feels a little disgust, if their conscience, moral compass functions. Tyler says “God hates us”, he means himself. His God is the Narrator, and does hate the impossible fake* ideal. Tyler is Ikea Model Man, a product of society and NOT a person. Americans in particular miss all this subtle irony, since it’s like an ego play. He remodels his kitchen, then his reputation. It’s ridiculous, a morality play. If you could be transplanted into the “perfect” body of a warrior, you’d still be a coward. It’s your soul, your character.

How many buff gym dudes with tatts nowadays would refuse the draft more than the scrawniest Boomer?

Some Boomer-bashing comes from weaker men. Would Tyler go to war? But he runs a military cult.

Tyler knew he was a character, from wall breaks, and would be destroyed in the end like a Devil on the shoulder.

A mannequin of postmodern immoral “manliness”. A man with the appearance of a God and the low morals of a Devil.

*worldly, hedonistic, materialistic, VAPID, Tyler is all-looks

Vapid: I don’t need women ….but here’s Marla, fuck capitalism ….but start a business, I have depression and no purpose ….except I’m energetic and obsessed**, who cares about appearances but punch my face, he’s basically a bloody thot, come on. Well ‘ard, he call them here, like a chav. Can you imagine what he’d do alone? Nothing, he has nothing. It’s like James Bond, if he can’t shoot it or seduce it, he isn’t interested.

Edgy McEdgelord, Puncheyface Champion.

Shocked he didn’t get Marla to strangle him during sex with apron-strings.

Print it, Hollywood!

A chav with better threads.

Modern men are sports-fucking civilization to death. No love, totally sterile of meaning. All about the cult of victory and selfies. Muh “men invented civilization” bullshit is proof, number 1 white men (and women) and 2 get off your arse then and at least maintain it!

It’s like the son of a famous gardener standing before a pile of weeds and bracken, pontificating how it’s HIS garden and it won awards and it’s HIS HIS ALL HIS.

On behalf of all women: STFU.

Be useful and still, STFU.

Be Spartan with your words, please.

** fucking uwu lad

“America is the greatest country in the world”

Hear me out before you hate me.

As far as historical achievement goes, England is the greatest country on Earth. That’s why we made America, England mark 2: Guns, lots of guns. The first Bill of Rights was English, we had the peasant’s revolt, our own Renaissance/Golden Age and more influence on the world’s learning than anyone else before. More geniuses came from our kin than any other part of the world. America has yet to replicate that intellectual impact (although the fake Jews have tried to posture as something like it) and hasn’t seen a single true genius of American birth in at least a century. Face it, you’re dysgenic.

But we love you irrespective of that.

All the things you value about America originated in mother England, your cultural and kin homeland. ‘America’ has only existed insofar as it was England, transplanted. Since it lacked homogeneity and shared, civilized culture, there is no United States – if there ever was. You still claim to believe in the Rights of Englishmen, with the high trust WEIRD honour culture of Protestant individualistic honesty, while denying its import. Was Henry VIII American now? Catholic countries are looking equally shit right now, from Spain to France to Mexico. The people make the culture, true but adopting a foreign, short-term culture (muh marry young and have too many kids in poverty) is also death. Without the women it detests, Vatican City would die out in a few generations. These places are cultures of death. There is no holy life that Jesus celebrated in them. They must import or else, like a leech without lifeblood, they die.

Likewise, you cannot have warring tribes in the same space – in Shakespeare plays as now. Darwin showed us humans always compete, always! Why aren’t you allowed to teach him in your schools? A “melting pot” is either a loss of each group’s interesting traits (which were unique and precious in their selection) or else one group swarming another once they have the numbers to conquer, as we witnessed in genocidal chimps. Humans are not special exceptions to these natural laws, there are no exceptions.

You’re speaking English – not French or Welsh or (until recently) Spanish. Do not forget your roots or you’ll die like the tree in the frost Tolkien warned us about. Instead of a Tolkien, you have a John Green, selling grubby teen cancer death plots to corrupt your children.

America signed its own death warrant in blood long ago. Rome fell because of its Empire ambitions (you cannot lead your inferiors, they consume you) leading to a weakness of the Roman people and eventual loss of identity.

What is there to fight for? What is there to protect? What is there to do but witness the last gasp of a once-great civilization?

You have trouble recruiting for your military too – or so I hear.

Where did American time preference go? Ask first: Where did it come from?

The great cathedrals required we be stewards of our kin for centuries. America never built a single castle. Nothing in your country was ever intended to last. And you’re proud of this? It’s obscene.

You can tell a lot about a country and its values by their architecture, is all I’ll say.

Where is your homogeneity? Where is your style? What are your materials?

Thailand has better home ownership laws than you and they openly allow child rape. What does that say?

The pretty speeches of American greatness are ringing increasingly hollow, like Anglo Powell describing the British Empire spirit after two world wars did before that. Your best days are clearly behind you but this won’t be a permanent situation unless you ignore it, put it off like rising consumer debt.

Re-capture the Zeitgeist, nobody else has enough strength left.

The gun-hoarding suggests you are not as happy with your ‘country’ as you’d like to seem, either.

Consider the mistakes of Rome again and do the opposite. They suffered from outbreeding depression, in short.

The patrician families selected the wrong suitors for money over a handful of generations and went extinct for it. They were foolish in the only way that mattered: their survival. It only took a few greedy sons marrying wealthy merchants or former but exotic-looking slaves (with slave IQ) and kaput, the whole family line dies. Regression to the mean of abilities is bad enough (Galton) but do not encourage it by marrying moral and intellectual inferiors. You muddy your bloodline, the line ends in short order. In the better times of all patriarchy, daughters were protected, bachelors were taxed (Sparta) to curb the moral decay of hedonism and to inherit, the elders of the family must first approve of their son’s marriage.

Do not forget this.

Men who sexually select poorly fail as surely as women with the same sin (a decision always based on lust). Owing to the fact divorce didn’t really exist, they paid for that error with their entire genetic future, gone. Only the official heir got family support, as it should be.

I’m sure they felt very beneficent as the invaders from the Germanic lot and others washed over them. One generation of maternal softness in fathers or unchecked lust in sons is all it takes. I’m sure they were very proud of their altruism and open-mindedness right up until their entire line died and it was all for nothing. 

The purpose of parents is to control their child until they are in a suitable marriage.

Some of you know all of this barring the specification suitable.

Bad wife, bratty children. Decadence is first produced in the choice of spouse.

Kings were vetoed in their choice of bride by the clergy for this reason. Kings!

Pic unrelated.

Nothing else makes the ‘right of Kings’ to rule divine.

Allowing your sons to marry dumpy foreign thots who put out as a mate capture strategy (having nothing else to offer) is a big nail in the coffin of your future. Young men are made vulnerable by vasopressin and feel they ‘love’ the slut who puts out. It’s a biochemical hook and your sons are the fish. No, he won’t find a wife by sleeping around, he’ll find a whore by definition. This is why relatives barred such a union in better societies and times and further, refused to fund the promiscuous or lascivious child whatsoever until they complied. Why do you think the upper-class still have their money after centuries? “Cutting off” the rotten branch. THAT is the core of conservatism, nothing less. The child didn’t need to ‘understand’, let alone agree (it isn’t their money!), the future of the family line was not up for negotiation, they simply needed to honour the wisdom of their parents. [Hooked: New Science on How Casual Sex is Affecting Our Children goes into the biology side of the chemical slut hypnosis.] Brain-addled boys (not mature until around 25) are not making lifelong decisions and must be stopped from ruining their life at least – stopped by their parents. There is no weakness in the child that is not in a parent first, so to exclusively blame the fruit of the tree is churlish. 

America’s temporary superiority from the dollar came after the Empire pound as reserve status. The usurers like us to fight one another, classic triangulation tactic, once there is no more labour to extract from the workers.
You work for your own destruction. Look no further than Planned Bachelorhood. You fund the people who will wipe you out in a war to settle your ‘debt’ to them.
A cultural alliance is over-due but American exceptionalism needs to die, or the American founder stock die with it in their indulgent patrician flavour of arrogance.

Great cunt-tree.

“Let him marry the seductive slave girl, what’s the harm?” – a Roman patrician, probably.

Do not weaken your seed stock with tainted grain. The Bible warns about all of these things expressly. Why is that? Have you forgotten or do you think American exceptionalism will spare you the wrath of the God you claim to follow?

https://biblereasons.com/evil-women-and-bad-wives/

Like Babylon it will.

Revenge is mine, saith the Lord.

In biology, breeding is the reward. You have produced incentives for worthless whore DNA, in both sexes. Being ‘sexy’ is not a valued quality in any civilization. It isn’t hard, either. With enough plucking, waxing, tanning, lipo, implants, anyone can look like that nowadays. Check yourselves and do better, America used to. I can’t picture Mark Twain electing to vainly show off his tan on holiday in just a pair of tiny gay short shorts. That you no longer bat an eyelid at this late-stage Calhoun rat behaviour, is more disturbing. America used to be globally respected when it had the patrician dignity of its English predecessors. (We’ve mostly lost it too but that’s a slightly different issue, not least because we’re presently imitating ‘American’ aka LA ‘culture’.)

It is not yet truly lost, merely forgotten.

However, the time is nigh. You don’t have long left, look at the white minority statistics and know some people lie on those surveys.

48% of Gen Z (at least) are non-white.

https://www.npr.org/2018/11/15/668106376/generation-z-is-the-most-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-yet?t=1566970164340

You’re almost dead anyway. 39% of Gen Y was non-white. These are the breeding generations.

You wanted a melting pot, you got it. That I understand but there is one thing outsiders cannot: Why are you so proud of your racial extermination? That’s what ‘melting pot’ means – you lose.

Again, why didn’t they teach you this one snippet of Darwinism? It’s vital to understand history.

You will end up in a Marxist pile of starved or shot bodies at this rate, unless sudden and decisive action is taken. It is mathematical fact and you’re all cravenly dodging it. You’re hipster rebels, poseurs of patriots. You protect nothing of your own, in reality, and defend even less from your ancestry.

This is why even the English now laugh at you and your callow pride. We know the mixed hordes (barbarians still) will vote in your Marxist enslavement, it’s only a matter of time.

Mass deportations, including of ‘families’ complete with white race traitors, will become necessary for you to just continue with ‘your’ culture, your capitalism, your genetic kin and its earned resources, built up over centuries.

The self-hating Anglo stock (r-types) are siding with the new victors, dysgenic raceless survivors, the ones now saying ‘punch a white’ (code Nazi) while putting on a Communist boot to place upon your ‘Merica necks and stamp. You must police your own kind. If men do not hold other men morally accountable, who else is there? Countrymen have an obligation to one another not to make things worse.

You mock the English for being weak (very oppressed by the ‘City’ of London but okay) but we generally disapprove of race mixing, unlike Americans. You perversely celebrate the virtues of your bought waifu. You are already, in this regard, a culture of death, just as surely as the Vatican.

Look at the number of your men lost to out-group unions, a zero sum gain for the Communist voting bloc in future.

Voting behaviour is genetic. There are studies. The ‘blacks’ you complain about are in fact mixed too. Generations of polite arguments and ‘logic’ mean nothing.

You are not being half as calculating as a white man should be, historically, even if you had the lowest of morals. There is a way to have your cake without stealing from your tribe. There is no vive la difference – the Trojan says this at the gate. Look at Greece, look at France. Socialist shit-holes.

Your enemy has told you what you’re doing to betray your country.

To answer the two common complaints from weasel word traitors:

So what if they’re sexy? Sterilise them and put them in brothels if you want to be using them solely for pleasure. So what if they’re nice? Their IQs are in the dumpster. Lots of imbeciles are nice. Child IQ is closest to maternal IQ. Do you want retarded offspring, compared to what you could have won? They can be very, very nice when you go visit them on holiday in their own shithole of a country. There is literally no need to import anything, least of all cheap pussy. Buy a fleshlight, degenerate.

Location: Burning Man.

If you disown your people in all their uniqueness for the baited hook of the exotic (their own men don’t want it, they know it’s toxic), at least leave the country permanently for the foreign clime first.

Do not shit the bed for the rest of us, we don’t have a second homeland. Trojan pussy is toxic pussy. That’s how the Spanish sailors were attacked by germ warfare, whichever disease you think did it.

Do not spread that shitskin loin fruit onto us (muh fellow ‘white’) and insist we pay for its sniffles, schooling and future STDs. No.

If you wanna marry out, have the decency to move out. Assuming she still wants you and not a green card to bring in all her cousins. Why are SJWs allowed to marry white men? Did you never ask? They are very spiteful in the target of their seductions, they want to keep you from a white woman and get you to fund your own destruction. They don’t want you because they like you, does the lion like the prey it follows? A trophy whipped white boy holding an alien baby is a status symbol among non-white women.

Pic unrelated.

All women instantly get the meaning: operation cuck.

By fighting, cuck to Israel. By fucking, cuck to Ting Tong. A cuck by any other name is still a cuck.

Henry Cavill was almost cucked completely by that hunter mutt but he heard she was trying to get pregnant and all he wanted was a rimming (from a man, truth be told). I’ve heard stories of reproductive abuse that’d turn your hair white. We all heard about NBA thots emptying out used condoms but the lowest is pipetting from the rectal cavity for re-application elsewhere. White men are totally ignorant of this, never told it’s a risk. Why?

Do not bring in the Trojan bastard anchor babies to bring down your filial culture. War is genetic.

h/t Millennial Woes

I suspect your next civil war will involve a roving group of executioners insisting to inspect the face of the wife before deciding whether to move onto the next house.

Corruption of moral standard is a vehicle for predators, in more ways than one.

https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2018/09/23/possible-motive-and-secret-history/

“It’s okay if I do it” – no, we must check everyone in society, you’re free to leave if you don’t like it, snowflake. Society is made up of individuals either doing the right thing or fucking it up deliberately hoping the rest will clean it up. Pro and anti-social, respectively. Adult patriarch and manchild.
When you choose profit over people, you perish. Personal profit includes tawdry appeals to Muh Dick.

American men were respected, even revered, in their true, natural culture of low time preference and pro-family concerns, including health and longevity. Acting ghetto is the opposite of this: artificial, hedonic, anti-natal, anti-national. They’ve become inverted Oreos, cultural deathknells of the change for malleable beige people sweeping us from the globalists. They are a kind of genetic shill, for mixing into non-existence, eventual white genocide. Self-extermination is worse. And you wonder why the culture is rapidly degrading?

Honey, you haven’t seen nothing yet.

America was a bastard in the genetic sense, the first major multicultural experiment with white people.

Cui bono? Who profited? Do you actually think the move to leave your kin, your protectors, to be ruled by cryptoJews was a move taken by Fellow Anglos?

“The races will cheerfully submit”…. After years of pornographic programming to get hot to chunky but squat mixed thots, they sure do.

Mixed people age visibly a lot faster than their non-mix parents too, they’ve yet to study that. It must be genetic. Do not fall for boob goggles. Wanting to sleep with someone doesn’t magically make them a good person, it’s just a Hollywood-planted fetish telling you that in siren song.

I am aware I’m pissing in the wind trying to turn stiff-necked American apostates (thou shalt not adulterate) onto the reality of their permissive suicide.

It’s heartbreaking, actually. I fear once America goes for good, we’re all doomed. America is meant to lead as example, none of us have the remaining strength. We can only follow the current cultural leader, while it’s still culturally white.

I don’t think you’ll do it. I think you’ll bitch, whine and nag about the Great Replacement but refuse to take the actions necessary to save yourselves, to salvage your once-great place to live. God forbid some hipster call you mean, better sell out the country.

America has no real history, no great stories, no true geniuses, no real culture. Even the food is sugary and pilfered from elsewhere e.g. apple pie. American happily poisons its own food and knowingly eats it until they resemble fat piggies. America encourages its own ignorant children to fornicate with their replacements and supports them in all other sins, while calling it a Christian nation. America has never been homogeneous, they always ‘allowed’ an element of rot and therefore, technically, never a unified country (except legally). If you permit cancer, hostile communities of cells, in a body of anything, eventually it’ll kill you. America is a mongrel nation like Sodom and Babylon before it and this split foundation enabled to feel superior to someone commands such suicidal loyalty that it appears to have secured its eventual failure; whether it happened sooner (now) or later with delayed immvasion laws.

One question strikes me going into 2020:

What if your perverse sense of patriotism, a false nationalism, causes you to become a culture of death?

Isn’t it, already?

 

Was the fornication worth the infanticide of your children?

America is not dirt. They sell you on evil by calling it American.

Well no true Scotsman to that notion.

Everyone who deliberately conceives children with fornication only to kill them wasn’t killed themselves. You are the epitome of the evil of hypocrisy. It saddens me greatly. I’ve been sitting up at night thinking of this, after reading about your demographics. It isn’t the Jews, per se, you are your own enemies. Don’t you see? You gave away your power as a people …for a lacklustre fuck. Just like Rome. The enemy is within, maybe. In more ways than one. They cannot do a thing without your giddy consent, without your willful degeneracy as a nation. Oh, but you’re just one individual, you claim so appeal to exception, you can’t possibly be held responsible for yourself… Last I checked, cultural individualism didn’t mean anti-kin, it was still a culture and hence, pro-natal with ingroup preference; a culture of prosperity made possible by the sacrifices of generations of honest genophilia. Stop calling evil ‘American’. I’m tired of the lies.

Is this ‘American’ cuckoo culture the white people version of the male chick meat grinder slide?

I think so, I hope not.

What slippery slope? Orgies go mainstream

According to the Bible, collapse should be right around the corner.

This has been happening in really warped Boomer couples for decades, but they’re pushing it into the mainstream now to attract young desperate people. As a local, we don’t talk about it. We know it happens, but it’s gross and most of the people are ugly, why bother? Swingers (people who refuse to divorce but flout their vows) and bisexuals (or try-sexuals) are responsible for all those STD epidemics you keep hearing about.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/heaven-circle-the-rise-of-the-sex-party-orgy-in-the-age-of-sex-positivism-a6977606.html

I wonder if there’s any link between “sex positivism” and the increasing rates of sexually-transmitted infections (see article elsewhere on this site)? Morality isn’t just some code invented by spoilsports – it has practical applications, and the lack of it has consequences, which we’re evidently seeing now.

It’s all a bit reminiscent of the last days of the Roman Empire, but I hope I’m wrong.

I don’t, those bastards deserved it.

Deja vu: the European invasion and the fall of Rome

http://www.evoandproud.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/deja-vu.html

….The Romans did have a system of collective defense. By the 4th century, there was an extensive network of walls, forts, and watchtowers along the border, as well as defense in depth—legions stationed farther behind to contain any incursions. But this system failed to allow for a situation where large numbers of barbarians would be invited to cross the militarized border zone with no opposition whatsoever. At that point, they entered the so-called ‘civil zone,’ where defenses were much weaker.

Ancient Border Control sucked too.

The resulting crisis tended to feed on itself. When large numbers of barbarians were invited in, even more decided to invite themselves. The border ceased to exist. There was no longer any barrier between the barbaric outer world and the pacified Roman world, which was home to millions of people who didn’t know how to defend themselves and who had not done so for generations.

soft-handed ninnies, we call them

And so the inevitable happened. The barbarians didn’t wish to destroy Roman society—they just wanted to help themselves to its wealth—-but their very presence made the survival of Roman society impossible. No, they didn’t completely destroy the heritage of Rome.

No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible ~ Stanislaw Jerzy Lec

They came to plunder, not to destroy; moreover, they were already semi-Roman and semi-Christian, and in time the kingdoms they founded would preserve some of that heritage. But the Empire did collapse, as a French historian has wryly pointed out:

Low IQ must be excluded from high IQ societies like aggressive drunks from a club.
Certainly they might have a good time there but that’s not the point.

For the decisive point is that Rome had shown its weakness by admitting peoples onto its territory whom it had been unable to subordinate and whose presence it had regularized without having vanquished them in the field. Contrary to what is commonly said today, the invasions really did happen. The Barbarians were in no way “invited” to settle in the empire. They entered in large numbers by immigration and also, at least in equal numbers, by violent invasion, by piercing the defense lines, plundering the cities, and massacring people as much in Italy and Greece as in Gaul, Spain, and Africa. (Voisin, 2014)….

I was reading about laconic wit earlier;

When asked whether it would be prudent to build a defensive wall enclosing the city, Lycurgus answered, “A city is well-fortified which has a wall of men instead of brick.”

Nordic Spartans? How white were Ancient Rome and Greece?

And that’s why the Ancients had Empires. The IQ required would match.

http://www.unz.com/article/what-race-were-the-greeks-and-romans/

…There is good reason to think that Homer was recording stories handed down during the Dark Age. He was a bard who lived in Ionia, a region on the Aegean coast of what is now Turkey, and if he were making the stories up he would have claimed that the heroes were Ionian. Instead, he sings praises to the light-haired Achaean nobility: Achilles, their greatest warrior, has “red-gold hair,” Odysseus, their greatest strategist, has “chestnut hair,” his wife Penelope has “white cheeks the color of pure snow,” Agamede, a healer and expert on medicinal plants, is “blonde,” and King Menelaus of Sparta, the husband of Helen, has “red hair.” Helen, likewise, has “fair hair,” and even slave girls are light-skinned: “fair-tressed Hecamede,” “fair-cheeked Chryseis,” and “blonde Briseis.” This is significant, for if even some of the slaves were blond it would mean the Nordic type was not unique to the Achaeans, that it was present elsewhere in the Aegean world.

Homer (and Pindar) describe most of the Olympian gods and goddesses as fair haired and “bright eyed,” meaning blue, grey or green. The goddess Demeter has “blond” or “yellow hair,” as does Leto, mother of Apollo, who is also described as “golden haired.” Aphrodite has “pale-gold” hair, and Athena is known as “the fair, bright-eyed one” and the “grey-eyed goddess.” Two of the gods, Poseidon and Hephaestus, are described as having black hair. As noted above, Xenophanes complained that all peoples imagine the gods to look like themselves…..

Thus, classical Greece was a fusion, both cultural and racial, of these two types of whites. Some city-states, such as Thebes and Sparta, were predominantly Nordic. Others, such as Athens, were predominantly Mediterranean, and still others were mixtures of the two.

300 didn’t feature enough gingers.

applause clap clapping yes well done

Wait, there’s more. On wikipedia;

Grant, after defining the Nordics as having aquiline noses, went back through history and found such a nose and other characteristics he called “Nordic” in many historically prominent men. Among these were Alexander the Great, Dante Alighieri, “all the chief men of theRenaissance“, as well as King David. Grant identified Jesus Christ as having had those “physical and moral attributes”.

Video: The Decline and Fall of the West & Biohistory

http://www.biohistory.org/biohistory-explained/

Biohistory is the study of the biological roots of human social behavior including the outbreak of wars, economic growth and decline, forms of government, and the rise and fall of civilizations. Biohistory proposes that changes in these areas reflect changes in the prevailing temperament of the population, which is in turn rooted in epigenetics.

I’d compare this to a systems theory level of knowledge.

Includes videos;

and one upcoming.

Demographic lessons for Europe from Will Durant, Gibbon re the Romans

“If we had, each of us, upheld the rights and authority of the husband in our own households, we should not today have this trouble with our women. As things are now, our liberty of action, which has been annulled by female despotism at home, is crushed and trampled on here in the Forum … Call to mind all the regulations respecting women by which our ancestors curbed their license and made them obedient to their husbands; and yet with all those restrictions you can scarcely hold them in. 1f now you permit them to remove these restraints . . . and to put themselves on an equality with their husbands, do you imagine that you will be able to bear them? From the moment that they become your equals they will be your masters” (Will Durant, Caesar And Christ, P. 89) source

Which ideology does that sound like?

Will Durant saw the decline of a civilization as a culmination of strife between religion and secular intellectualism, thus toppling the precarious institutions of convention and morality. This is happening everyday as rule of law is being undermined by those that have lost touch with our god-given morality for secular philosophy. To quote Durant:

“Hence a certain tension between religion and society marks the higher stages of every civilization. Religion begins by offering magical aid to harassed and bewildered men; it culminates by giving to a people that unity of morals and belief which seems so favorable to statesmanship and art; it ends by fighting suicidally in the lost cause of the past.

For as knowledge grows or alters continually, it clashes with mythology and theology, which change with geological leisureliness. Priestly control of arts and letters is then felt as a galling shackle or hateful barrier, and intellectual history takes on the character of a “conflict between science and religion.”

Institutions which were at first in the hands of the clergy, like law and punishment, education and morals, marriage and divorce, tend to escape from ecclesiastical control, and become secular, perhaps profane. The intellectual classes abandon the ancient theology and-after some hesitation-the moral code allied with it; literature and philosophy become anticlerical. The movement of liberation rises to an exuberant worship of reason, and falls to a paralyzing disillusionment with every dogma and every idea.

Hello, Atheism Plus.

Conduct, deprived of its religious supports, deteriorates into Epicurean chaos [DS: hedonism]; and life itself, shorn of consoling faith, becomes a burden alike to conscious poverty and to weary wealth. In the end a society and its religion tend to fall together, like body and soul, in a harmonious death. Meanwhile among the oppressed another myth arises, gives new form to human hope, new courage to human effort, and after centuries of chaos builds another civilization.source

Finally, this entire article;

Had every Roman father been teaching his sons righteousness instead of war, and every mother making a home for her children; had all parents assembled their children in their homes instead of the circuses and public baths; had they taught them chastity and honor and integrity and cleanness; would Rome still be a world power? Certainly it was not the barbarians from the north but the insidious moral termites within that destroyed the Roman world empire….

The story of the civilizations of the world is a continued story of the same weaknesses that leave a country helpless and disintegrated.

In our own time on both sides of the Atlantic and the Pacific and in the north and the south, we seem to be following the same trends. Our successes bring us to extravagances, to our seeking for high amusement. We control childbirth and reduce our families. We divorce and break up our homes. Many of our children become orphans in one way or another. We become irreligious and practice evil ways. We indulge in the bestial satisfactions. We crave social activities at the expense of our family life and … we lose our sense of rightness, of goodness, of devotion.

It is easy to see the resemblance between our modern-day situation and that of ancient Rome. According to Will Durant [an eminent writer and student of civilization], “Prostitution flourished. Homosexualism was stimulated by contact with Greece and Asia; many rich men paid a talent ($3,600) for a male favorite; Cato complained that a pretty boy cost more than a farm. But women did not yield the field to these Greek and Syrian invaders. They took eagerly to all those supports of beauty that wealth now put within their reach. Cosmetics became a necessity, and caustic soap imported from Gaul tinged graying hair into auburn locks.

Women won the free administration of their dowries, divorced their husbands or occasionally poisoned them, and doubted the wisdom of bearing children in an age of urban congestion and imperialistic wars. Already by 160 Cato and Polybius had noted a decline of population and the inability of the state to raise such armies as had risen to meet Hannibal. The new generation, having inherited world mastery, had not time or inclination to defend it; that readiness for war which had characterized the Roman landowner disappeared now that ownership was being concentrated in a few families and a proletariat without stake in the country filled the slums of Rome. Men became brave by proxy; they crowded the amphitheater to see bloody games and hired gladiators to fight before them at their banquets.” (Will Durrant, The Story of Civilization, Caesar and Christ, pp. 89–90)

My brothers and sisters, I beg of you to study history—the history of the world. Look at Babylon in Assyria. Look at Jerusalem. Read about Sodom and Gomorrah. The story of Rome and its dissoluteness is in every library. Other cities likewise slipped from high plateaus to low marshes and defilement.

Rome gained the world and lost its soul. As Durant says, “Every new conquest made Rome richer, more rotten, more merciless. She had won every war but the class war. … Now through a hundred bitter years of revolution, Rome would pay the penalty of gaining the world.” (Durant, p. 108.)

His epilogue summarizes: “A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself within. The essential causes of Rome’s decline lay in her people, her morals, her class struggle, her failing trade, her bureaucratic despotism, her stifling taxes, her consuming wars.” (Durant, p. 665.)

We have been concerned with the rapid rise of a public notion that families should be reduced. A congressman whom we know proposed a program of limiting the family to two children. Again, study the history of countries that have done this. It seems that imported laborers, slaves, uneducated criminals often take the place of the children who would have been under supervision and training.

Will Durant queries:

What had caused this fall in population? Above all, family limitation. Practiced first by the educated classes, it had not seeped down to a proletariat named for its fertility; by a.d. 100 it had reached the agricultural classes. … Though branded as a crime, infanticide flourished as poverty grew. Sexual excesses may have reduced human fertility; the avoidance or deferment of marriage had a like effect, and the making of eunuchs increased as Oriental customs flowed in to the West. …

“The rapidly breeding Germans could not understand the classic culture, did not accept it, did not transmit it; the rapidly breeding Orientals were mostly of a mind to destroy that culture; the Romans, possessing it, sacrificed it to the comforts of sterility. Rome was conquered not by barbarian invasion from without, but by barbarian multiplication within.

I could make a joke about British mass immigration but it already is one.

“Moral decay contributed to the dissolution. … Men had now, in the middle and upper classes, the means to yield to temptation, and only expediency to restrain them. Urban congestion multiplied contacts and frustrated surveillance; immigration brought together a hundred cultures whose differences rubbed themselves out into indifference. Moral and esthetic standards were lowered by the magnetism of the mass; and sex ran riot in freedom while political liberty decayed.” (Durant, pp. 666–67.)

The real tragedy is the large number of innocent children who live with only one parent after a divorce or family breakup. In a city not far away from Salt Lake City, 38 percent of all the children under 18 are short of parents. Only one parent is their best record. When children drop to a one-parent basis, that is the announcement of the failing civilization, and it means social disorganization. One survey stated that 70 percent of male prisoners in the United States came from broken homes where they lived with only one parent. (“Home: the Place to Save Society,” Ensign, January 1975, 3)

Ezra Taft Benson (Quorum of the Twelve)

As a free people, we are following very closely in many respects the pattern which led to the downfall of the great Roman Empire. A group of well-known historians has summarized those conditions leading to the downfall of Rome in these words:

“… Rome had known a pioneer beginning not unlike our own pioneer heritage, and then entered into two centuries of greatness, reaching its pinnacle in the second of those centuries, going into the decline and collapse in the third. Yet, the sins of decay were becoming apparent in the latter years of that second century.

19th Century – Industrial Revolution.
20th Century – Computer and Electronic Revolution.
21st Century – ???

“It is written that there were vast increases in the number of the idle rich, and the idle poor. The latter (the idle poor) were put on a permanent dole, a welfare system not unlike our own. As this system became permanent, the recipients of public largesse (welfare) increased in number. They organized into a political block with sizable power. They were not hesitant about making their demands known. [£$£$£$£$£$] Nor was the government hesitant about agreeing to their demands … and with ever-increasing frequency. Would-be emperors catered to them. The great, solid middle class—Rome’s strength then as ours is today—was taxed more and more to support a bureaucracy that kept growing larger, and even more powerful. Surtaxes were imposed upon incomes to meet emergencies. The government engaged in deficit spending. The denarius, a silver coin similar to our half dollar, began to lose its silvery hue. It took on a copper color as the government reduced the silver content.

“Even then, Gresham’s law was at work, because the real silver coin soon disappeared. It went into hiding.

“Military service was an obligation highly honored by the Romans. Indeed, a foreigner could win Roman citizenship simply by volunteering for service in the legions of Rome. But, with increasing affluence and opulence, the young men of Rome began avoiding this service, finding excuses to remain in the soft and sordid life of the city. They took to using cosmetics and wearing feminine-like hairdo’s and garments, until it became difficult, the historians tell us, to tell the sexes apart.

cracking up dawn french

“Among the teachers and scholars was a group called the Cynics whose number let their hair and beards grow, and who wore slovenly clothes, and professed indifference to worldly goods as they heaped scorn on what they called ‘middle class values.’

Hipsters.

The morals declined. It became unsafe to walk in the countryside or the city streets. Rioting was commonplace and sometimes whole sections of towns and cities were burned.

Like a London Riot?

And, all the time, the twin diseases of confiscatory taxation and creeping inflation were waiting to deliver the death blow.

“Then finally, all these forces overcame the energy and ambition of the middle class.

“Rome fell.

“We are now approaching the end of our second century.” (Address by Governor Ronald Reagan of California at Eisenhower College, New York, 1969.)

In 1787 Edward Gibbon completed his noble work The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Here is the way he accounted for the fall:

1. The undermining of the dignity and sanctity of the home, which is the basis of human society.

2. Higher and higher taxes and the spending of public monies for free bread and circuses for the populace.

3. The mad craze for pleasure, sports becoming every year more and more exciting and brutal.

4. The building of gigantic armaments when the real enemy was within the decadence of the people.

5. The decay of religion—faith fading into mere form, losing touch with life, and becoming impotent to warn and guide the people.

Is there a parallel for us in America today? Could the same reasons that destroyed Rome destroy America and possibly other countries of the free world?

For eight years in Washington I had this prayerful statement on my desk: “O God, give us men with a mandate higher than the ballot box.”

The lessons of history, many of them very sobering, ought to be turned to during this hour of our great achievements, because during the hour of our success is our greatest danger. Even during the hour of our great prosperity, a nation may sow the seeds of its own destruction. History reveals that rarely is a great civilization conquered from without unless it has weakened or destroyed itself within.

The lessons of history stand as guideposts to help us safely chart the course for the future. (“Watchmen, Warn the Wicked,” Ensign, July 1973, 38)