When you think about it we live in the most unfree, tyrannical society ever.
Holding a public opinion gets you arrested and thrown into a dangerous, deprived place full of armed disease-ridden savages who want to psychologically torture and kill you for breathing because something something Crusades.
Show me any time period in history that tops that for the average citizen.
Only the genocidal witch trials maybe. MAYBE.
We will be the future’s dystopian historical setting.
If the State enforcers don’t like the parents, they can steal (and sell) children.
That is slavery, literally. Thanks, Blair! (not accidental)
The Lefty McCann parents still have their kids. So who’s getting robbed in the most evil (genocidal) way and their children literally abused in a system that doesn’t care, they have worse life outcomes across the board (there are many many cases if you look)?
Above: we make it worse in every way, let us magically make it better with even more money.
Abuse cases involve physical, sexual and psychological abuse, plus the fundamental isolation (human right to family life) of being kidnapped on top of prison structures (Orwellian “care homes”) inflicted on innocent people (the places have guards, it’s a prison) – so taking them out of those alleged* situations isn’t the real motive, is it? There are druggings (poisonings) and tasers involved if the child resists their effective imprisonment.
But making “bad people” aka bad parents not have kids in the first place is “evil”?
No, only if you wanted to sell them.
Sorry, “financial incentives”.
We live in a world of fat teachers reporting children for obesity. I didn’t realise they were doctors.
Why not arrest the teachers? If the children weigh in (humiliation is illegal but they do) then why not the teachers in front of the kids?
*Implying public servants never lie to justify their job, you kidding? Why are family courts not public as common law dictates yet socially valid? That makes them technically illegal and they will be outed eventually.
Why doesn’t a child have a say in who they’re sold to? (Forced adoption is the PC term for legal human chattel, fridge horror is knowing taxpayers fund their own children being sold from them).
Why conduct social engineering experiments on helpless children they know to cause bad outcomes e.g. two “dads”, single foster parent, mixed religions that mutilate the genitals of children?
Adoption studies show it doesn’t work, they still end up like their birth parents, so “improvement” isn’t a valid excuse anymore (Jayman covered parenthood and adoption facts that go against “common sense”).
Care homes are just children’s prisons worse than 99% of the situations (they appeal to exception) they seek to “rescue” the child from and get this, many are actually privately owned.What’s the first thing a pedophile would buy into?
Their testimony, btw, is not believed, especially if they put drugs in the kid’s food.
A prisoner in for child rape has more rights and public respect for their feelings than a child in a “care home”.
So they’re taken out of a home that’s probably fine but poor (money into the home would help instead of giving it to busybodies who want to control freak a child’s life because they’re childless**) and instead abused in a system of all types then cycle of abuse means they’re likelier to “need” that system in future like a hole in the head.
Where is the logic here?
Dependence, never trust a socialist. You’re better to them weak or dead.
The state grows as the people wither.
** Measure a social worker’s saliva serotonin when they get their (sexual) high off being a control freak and order the kidnapping of children. It would be comparable to SS camp guards in Nazi Poland. Do that study, Peterson, become a legend in psychiatry. I won’t take credit, I swear. It would come under pathological altruism despite being sadistic, deliberately abusive but masquerading as altruistic for a dual boost (covert narcissism).
The McCanns neglected their children obviously, but who’s to say what is neglect and abuse? The SS as they’re aptly known tried to take children off people for political party membership (never a left wing one, it was libertarian UKIP), for being Christian and for teaching them “bad” habits like making gun noises at school during lunch or being unPC, telling the black kid at school they aren’t English and never will be, they’re African (biological fact). That last child was put on a list. Literally.
The SS are the enemy. Any excuse to intrude in your life and threaten to genocide (c, e and usually b) a bloodline they hate, think SJWs with power over innocents. For b, there are plenty of studies that keeping a child from their relatives exerts profound psychological damage, it’s essentially a form of torture.
It’s political war on your very bloodline, that’s worse than murder!
At least the child would survive you! And be raised by family, where the only good scientific outcomes happen!
They called the Rotherham rape victims prostitutes. They still do.
That is not even feminist. That’s gaslighting for terrorists (sexual terrorism), a form of treason.
Abuse of public office? Neglect (irony) of duty of care? Privileging adults over children they are sworn to defend? (They swear oaths in kangaroo court but an oath to do their damn job hasn’t been brought in because….?)
These people brought in Sharia courts in the West. A parallel legal system, also illegal and invalid.
They are the biggest child abusers in the world, by number and horror.
Look up the woman from Italy (white foreigners aren’t safe!) forced to have a C-section (which could’ve killed her!) so they could steal her pre-term (now at-risk) baby before she left the country legally to go home!
This happens every day, ruled in secret courts.
You don’t hear about it because years after the case, the poor parents can’t legally talk about it!
Is that justice? Ah, no reporters that way. Clear motive why it’s “contempt of (illicit) court”.
MRAs need to make family courts public before any otherlegal changes can happen, idiots.
Oh, and they target poor couples who can’t afford to legally defend themselves from the slander of monstering. Vox Day won’t dare mention this mess. A study of children taken by class membership would definitively prove the social injustice and its precise genocide.
No court should be secret in a free society.
It doesn’t protect the children, it protects the slave owners.
Why can’t the child sue the person who bought them?
I’m busy running around for this GE which surprised me so, so much, like I did Brexit last year.
My prediction? The WWC want Brexit and they’re angry. They voted for it and the supposed conservatives (cucks) aren’t delivering. The working class won’t vote Labour after Rotherham, the traitors have lost two, three generations easily and the old 20th century WWC loyalty goes along with it.
Miliband’s out of touch comments about Islamophobia really sealed it, however socialist Corbyn tries to virtue signal, it’s obvious he doesn’t care about workers from this country and the London mayor isn’t even British. Meanwhile, Trump cuddles up to Merkel over May and nobody says anything. Surrounded by deceivers.
Third party protest votes will be the way to go, and post-Brexit, there’s one obvious candidate.
A coalition is a distinct possibility, but it eats into Labour so for now the Tories won’t care.
“Anonymous took down child porn sites on the dark web, they also took down many scam sites. Freedom Hosting was the target of Anonymous that said that 50% of over 10,000 sites were child porn.”
You can tell the real Anonymous because they have a sense of humour and don’t bloviate until after something is done.
Where do they get them?
“Social services, adoption services.”
Rotherham was one of many.
“Word. This is the only conspiracy I’ve ever seen get censored on the internet. There has been a lot of crazy stuff that has flown around, for some reason this topic is the unique one.”
“It’s time for Trump to declare war on child sex trafficking in this country. Force the entire House & Senate to back it…and watch who tries to refuse.”
Slavery. It’s the classic model.
Start with Michael Jackson. Yeah, the whole file, you know he had peepholes and secret cameras, currently rotting in Hell.
There is so much medical and psychiatric evidence of child abuse that at this point in time, anyone denying it is practically outing themselves as a pedophile. Life outcomes, suicide, these are not ‘relationships’ and consent is medical, so if anything it should be 18. Enforced rigorously.
“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”
Victim blaming. Why Rotherham happened. It was deliberate. It was a social experiment.
Almost as if they have a …Common Purpose.
Read UK Column people. Before it’s exposed, if ever.
Common Purpose could be nominated as the first SJWs, they are far, far Left on all matters degenerate and especially sexual. Animals? Fine. Kids? Whatever. Dead people? Clump of cells, nobody in there to consent or object. Even the acronym CP is also internet slang for child pr0n. Their symbol is an innocent little butterfly apparently.
I would write more but I am scared, truthfully, because they get to people. Anyone who speaks out openly, in public, you don’t really hear from again.
A lot of their fellow travellers are known to police, and travel openly, untouchable by national law because they’re rich and registered overseas.
They deserve the same treatment as the other kinds of rape gang. It makes me sick to share a city with these scum.
Meanwhile, the Tories toast to their glorious opposition’s stupidity in hiring a senile white man.
“CP has been rather reluctant to explain exactly what change they are seeking, but clues are to be found in their widely pro-EU approach, and their desire to fill the ‘invisible space between the individual and the State with their people.'”
“In targeting young minds with their quasi political change agenda, CP under the hand of Sir David Bell has worked to use the secretive Common Purpose networks to tap into education budgets and thus spread their ‘charitable’ political agenda at the expense of the taxpayer. Moreover this has been done by using staff who have not always been police CRB checked, but who can use powerful and largely undeclared applied behavioural psychology. ”
“Scriven selected Sheffield City Council’s own Executive Director of Children and Young People and Common Purpose trained ‘leader’ Sonia Sharp to investigate and report. Sharp had previously been in the same Director’s post in Rotherham during the widespread abuse of youngsters in the town and under the protection of the Rotherham Council.”
“To date, CP has ‘trained’ many tens of thousands of children and young people in Britain alone, with countless others overseas. The exact number is unknown because CP regards training programmes, exact content and the names of attendees as secret ‘commercial’ information. The lack of clear information on CP’s penetration of schools, colleges and academies should be of immediate concern to parents and those involved in child safeguarding. If CP is such an open trustworthy charity, why is it so secretive about its real agenda around children?”
“Access to children via schools, colleges and other venues, coupled with powerful psychology to change the views and values of children must surely be a dangerous cocktail. Couple this with secretive networks of Common Purpose graduates, and their declared interest in “leading outside authority”, and surely this charity becomes a ‘sweety shop’ for perverts? Does Common Purpose recognise the risk of their operating procedures? From their aggressive stance, it appears not.”
“uniform re-education of children into the new world view.”
Are we going to go like the feminists and say 1 in 69 or some such?
Where are they on this?
Oh, they’re very accepting of men if they’re holding a Koran.
Note: these are the child victims, not the adults and various antisocial behaviour they get away with. Why do you think clubs have been closing? They descend like a plague of locusts to assault you. The harassment laws still apply in clubs, but these low IQ degenerate refuse the rights of women not to be [Third World behaviour here].
You may have heard a while back about the Italian woman knocked out, given a C-section and having had her child kidnapped.
Italians were rightly outraged. This is part of a process called a forced adoption.
It seems this is a much bigger problem than I’d thought. The people who allowed Rotherham among many other unreported cases to happen, and since MW is covering Rotherham abuses of power extensively, I decided to look into their operations. It is chilling and disturbing viewing.
Secret courts. That’s how this happens.
Watch the whole thing, listen to the teenage boy assert his human rights and be pinned down painfully by adult men, handcuffed despite committing no crime and screaming. Tell me there’s nothing wrong with the system.
The targets exist, brought in under Blair, yet I have seen them deny this elsewhere despite evidence. Who sets them and why doesn’t matter, fact is they get paid to traffic children and this acts as incentive for corruption.
Notice the way the social worker (they’re all SJWs and simply get pushed to another council when caught out) smiles when she says about the extreme of taking children for no good reason.
Here, in the first minute of secret filming, they admit to leaving children homeless out in the cold to sleep on a park bench.
A judge himself admits people could be forgiven for thinking the family courts (secret courts) are “neither compassionate nor humane”.
“Maggie Mellon who is the Deputy Chair of the British Association of Social Workers said:
“The policy imperative towards more and quicker forced adoption means we may well look back at this period in horror as we do now to the forcible removal of thousands of children to Australia in the 1930s, forties and fifties without their parents’ knowledge and consent. That was done because it was felt it was the right thing but now we think how on earth could we possibly have done that?””
Already covering themselves as the victims under We Didn’t Know! As they write the reports to make it happen.
Note: The entryism and punishment for critical thought for the honest people who try to take up the career. They are routinely denied promotion or fired for refusing to acquiescence to their superior’s demands, regardless of the child’s best interests. “Risk of harm” is as reliable as a horoscope, guesswork wide open to deception, there is a risk of harm to anyone walking in a public street, day or night. Must we adults be locked up for our own safety? The Court of Protection even confines the elderly, by calling them a danger to themselves (strangely, they get control of the elder’s finances, which I’m sure presents no motive). http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2014/05/27/social-worker-suspended-register-undermining-child-protection-order-application/
No less evidence presented than to Parliament itself, those in charge are fully aware of this and do nothing.
“I have several judgements showing the building of fake evidence at a ridiculous level without even any care for making this fake evidence looking true. It is brutal to say this but social workers perjury, administration cover-up and mock trials are dominating family courts. No wonder why they don’t want the press to see this. In COA I have seen a judge who is now in the House of Lords justifying to a father the removal of his son that way : You show that you could probably be a good father but you will raise your son in the dislike of the professionals (social workers) involved in your life.”
How can the failure to act be explained?
Well, there are plenty of allegations of elite pedophile rings in the UK and this would make powerful people easy to blackmail and control.