Nowhere to run

Excellent, I knew the Guardian would have to go over classism eventually.

Let’s see if you really want the diversity when your kid’s being punched in the gut.

Look no further than Diane Abbot’s kid. The Left MPs are the worst for this.

Admittance should be based on IQ, not sex, not age, not religion. IQ is the academic metric, that’s the purpose of teaching different levels of information – to adjust to their probable IQ, not their age.

Age is a weak proxy.

Allow MOOCs for most basic credits, including the political stuff (no presence required), allow summer credits for smart kids to get ahead, let the kids leave at 14 for work if they want. Let them leave as early as they qualify to.

Put cheating parents and transcript frauds up on criminal charges, it’s worse than lying on a CV because it deprives a more deserving child at a critical window of time and a meritocracy is meant to be about deserving. Also, fix child nutrition, no more omega 6 heavy brain fog diets then wondering why the state school kids are slow and shrunken.

The middle-class are oppressing their fellow whites by escaping the diverse enrichment with their own kids, it’s apartheid education, exactly. Whoever gave you that term deserves a medal, and a parade. And a lifetime supply of good chocolate. A+++ doubleplusgood meme magic.

For thee, but not for me. This isn’t cricket, bitches.

If they care so much, home school.

Unless they’re lazy, which we know they are. Both parents want to avoid their spawn to go to work. The middle class fallacy – they think if they throw money at a problem, they can fix it. If their child is stupid, because it’s the average of the parents, they throw money in ‘tutoring’ – that’s cheating, legally they’re meant to get exactly equal lessons to take the same bloody tests, that’s the only way it functions AS a test, so that’s next on my hit-list. Inaccuracies in testing validity caused by cribbing from prior exam papers.

You cannot undermine the entire purpose of the fair test by giving some test-takers the equivalent of performance-enhancing extra booster lessons.

Stop grading on a curve, it punishes the child for the actions of the other children, making it technically cruel (life-altering) and unusual punishment, it’s witch trial logic, they are NOT magically responsible for the whole class, it is used by teachers to hide their inadaquacies – individual test taker, individual grade.

As for ‘getting rid of selection’ that makes no sense except at a Uni level.

Where it counts. Not based on race or sex or anything but IQ.

We all know UCAS is rigged to whoever can get little Tarquin into the most extracurriculars.

Why are Unis allowed to accept based on class-privileged behaviours like foreign travel? That has nothing to do with the child’s intellectual ability, does it? The middle-class is anti-merit and pro-classism, so let’s tear down the barriers to their white majority enclaves and see how they like it.

My fellow white.

Most Guardian readers are in that category. That’s a nice petard you have there.

See, they rely on us being loyal mindless workers for them when they are openly disloyal and contemptuous to us.

If open borders are so great, let’s use the teachers to “open the borders” of education.

We iz raisin awareness, like. Racial awareness, right. As long as they can watch the mob crush us underfoot from their safe spaces, they’ll keep voting for our mutual destruction. We’re helping them.

They’re such snobs, though. They act like poor people can’t read.

“Low information voters” is a dog whistle, it is anti-white.

The TV is almost entirely middle-class, that’s why it’s patronizing bullshit. They value cheap nannies over your life, do not pity them.

You have to work up the pyramid of class to get political traction. The working class know who’s screwing them, now it’s the middle’s turn to learn who really owns the whip hand and has no fear of using it against them.

Stage 2: piss off the middle. Been planning this shit for years, tis good shit.

No country for goodwhites. No such thing as a good white person, to the people they call allies.

Your interests are not safe. I won’t let them be. The beauty of this plan is that it would happen anyway and once set up, you just let them naturally escalate based on the cracked facade of their cheerleader effect. Set it and forget it.

All we needed was to plant a meme. Sow a seed. Throw them an apple of discord. European history has all the answers we need. Let the genetic conflicts flow through you. Diversity + Proximity = PC

We have had to be Jews about this for quite some time, with fine results.

At this point, it’s hilarious to see who’s jewing who quite seriously. Their lack of homogeneity was always their fatal weakness. Divide and conquer, as it would always be applied eventually, force them to see it NOW.

Defund middle hobbies from (((theatre))) to abstract tat, go after their (((schools))) and ‘job opportunities’ with foreign visas. Expose the domestic slavery of paying illegals less than the socialist approved minimum wage. Go after IT for tax evasion, pay the Beast. It’s about time the working class fucked them back for a change, innit?

After all, Shakespeare is racist.

It works because it’s so trivial.

We must replace your cultural heritage of white supremacy privilege kek. I shall not rest until every white academic is replaced by a proud lesbian of colour. Let’s see if you care about anti-white crime when little Noah gets acid attacked at his new, re-educated state school of Benetton colours.

White culture must be defunded, deplatformed and your statues torn down. You’re not proud, are you?

…Are you?

If they won’t let Muslim taxi drivers take their children to school, they’re not very PC, are they? Who cares about your safety, Tarquin? Eat your halal meal and be quiet.

They are supremely cold people. You must understand them. They betray their people, they “identify” with white culture. This is why they laugh at Rotherham rapes but get offended if you try to cancel a play.

The Left has to move faster because we’re forcing their hand, while demographics are still mildly on our side.

The truth is, the vibrants have no loyalty. They are not your foot soldiers. We can easily move them but until recently, we assumed group loyalty. If you can blame our little girls for being raped, we can let the enrichment fuck all of you too.

Voila! More progress now in the past five than in the prior fifty years.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/28/rotherham-child-sexual-abuse-six-more-men-convicted

What a coincidence.

They’ve been telling (gaslighting) the working class for centuries that if an ((immigrant)) happens to be more capable than they are, they should be replaced.

It’s amazing how you all think I do nothing but stuff I want to happen magically does?

Keep hanging your useless faggy banners over motorways, arseholes.

Link: The 8th grade exam, 1895

http://reactionarytimes.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/the-one-room-school-house.html

I couldn’t pass this, I’ll be honest. And I read 19th century literature extensively, it isn’t the wording.
I’m not American though, so perhaps that’s an excuse?
The Victorian RT, the best proxy for true IQ, was higher than in modernity. Flynn effect is largely fake, excepting nutrition (especially iodine and later folic acid), a one-time boost of the mean, not the upper limit.

Largely it’s in avoiding toxins.

How many mothers know you’re not supposed to make up baby formula with fluoridated water?

Want social justice?

Stop grading kids on a curve. It shouldn’t matter what the person next to them did, either they know it or they don’t.
Quit using pop culture, especially rap, which is racist since blacks have an advantage. If they want to leave education early to pursue trades, let them. Do not allow the bright children to act as unofficial TAs unless they are getting paid. Discipline early and strictly. Exclude frequently. NPD thrives on attention. Bring in gifted programmes, blind-qualified, not appealing to the lowest common denom.
Test teacher IQ stringently. If IQ doesn’t count, neither should grades aka bring back Pass/Fail wherever possible since that’s clearly the ‘standard’.
No extra points for hobbies.
No marks for charity work, which is truly slave labour.
Teachers held accountable by students e.g. grading on-time.
Acknowledge the hierarchy of power, you are not friends, teachers must be mature, neutral role models i.e. no personal stories, no turning up drunk, political lecturing is fined.
Dumb teachers lead to dumb everyone.
The Victorian schoolmistresses (yes, women worked before they voted, America) used to have to learn particular skills, one that stuck out was the ability to draw a perfect circle in chalk on the board with one hand. How many tenured professors can do this?
Obviously, no obese teachers until they cut the chub. It’s a bad influence on the children, since they’re all Tabula Rasa, constantly lectured on how Not to be fat… by the fat.

Education is still the answer but most children shouldn’t be in it.

http://greyenlightenment.com/despite-indoctrination-a-college-degree-may-still-be-the-best-path-out-of-poverty/

Sorry liberals, students need rote and repetition

It works and it’s the same reason Asia is trashing the West.

They are big on rote.

http://nautil.us/issue/17/big-bangs/how-i-rewired-my-brain-to-become-fluent-in-math-rd
“Worse, students often believe they understand something when, in fact, they don’t. By championing the importance of understanding, teachers can inadvertently set their students up for failure as those students blunder in illusions of competence.”

Oh look, all the problems and here’s the source.

I don’t think it’s inadvertent.
Understanding concepts is lazy introductory work. They’re trying to turn STEM into something like English lit, where your ability to blag counts for something.

“I couldn’t help but reflect back on the West Point-trained engineers I’d worked with in the Army. Their mathematically and scientifically based approach to problem-solving was clearly useful for the real world—far more useful than my youthful misadventures with math had been able to imagine.”

The sound of liberal arts majors weeping.
What goes unmentioned is that high neural plasticity exists in the innately intelligent. Stupid people are stuck and past a certain age, can’t learn new tricks. Considering the low IQ of Education majors, perhaps they’re literally incapable of teaching these things? Wouldn’t we have to fire them? Or pay them based on performance?

“I was beginning to intuit that the sparse outlines of the equation were like a metaphorical poem, with all sorts of beautiful symbolic representations embedded within it.”

The liberal arts refuses to believe other subjects possess emotion. Or beauty.

“Time after time, professors in mathematics and the sciences have told me that building well-ingrained chunks of expertise through practice and repetition was absolutely vital to their success.”

Lazy teachers screaming in the distance.
It’s very simple.
Go back to the old repetition or don’t bother sending the kids to school because they’ll literally forget everything over summer anyway.

Paper: Non-whites are better off in Britain than White Britons

https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/migration-and-social-mobility-life-chances-britain%E2%80%99s-minority-ethnic-communities

The schools and academia seem to be the cause of this racist rot. Natives are being dispossessed, in a browner country this would rightfully cause outcry from liberals.

Unemployment in certain races is written off as a victim of circumstance rather than a possible lifestyle choice.

  • Exploring differences between religious groups reveals that, controlling for their backgrounds and other characteristics, Jews and Hindus are more likely to end up in a higher social class than their Christian counterparts; Muslims and Sikhs have lower chances.

Christophobia? (now a minority in schools in their own country, scored down on assessments for being ‘too white’)

Sikhophobia?

Jewish Privilege?

Hindu Privilege?

… Brown Guilt?

BTW The economy is screwed.  Some of these findings are not based on merit (IQ).

The purpose of Education

“In our dreams, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present education conventions fade from their minds, and unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning, or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, editors, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have an ample supply…The task we set before ourselves is very simple as well as a very beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just where they are. So we will organize our children and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way, in the homes, in the shops and on the farm.” – General Education Board, Occasional Papers, No. 1 (General Education Board, New York, 1913) p. 6.

Link: Assortative mating and class

http://www.unz.com/jman/the-son-becomes-the-father/

Hardly any social mobility. No hypogamy. No hypergamy (the small-scale sociology theory seems to be wrong over many generations when you look at the genetics). I wasn’t expecting that. It shows psychology has its limits too, when they’re looking in the wrong place (teachers) and asking the wrong questions (how valuable is an education?).

What we see is clearly an argument for sexually selective Leagues. (Bear in mind, it would count MMV as well as SMV). It seems to be mostly genes.

The idea that this transmission of status over time has been as Clark found it squares well with another facet I discuss frequently on this blog: the fact that parenting doesn’t have much of a lasting effect on children’s outcomes.

Although parenting can let the team down if it’s atrocious (i.e. modern) and without instinct. But it seems later generations might have hope of regaining lost ground. Presumably there’s regression to mean in parenting quality, and since most people are totally forgotten by the 4th generation it’s no wonder we see no effect.

The interesting thing is that even the people who take me seriously on this point still believe that there’s something their efforts can do, beyond keeping their children fed, clothed, clean, and cognizant of the basic ways of the world. Steven Sailer frequently suggests that the outcome of poorer children, especially those of color (mostly Hispanics) would improve if they had fewer of them, and hence could afford to invest more in each, despite the fact that this doesn’t hold up in adoption studies.

It’s an oxytocin-based instinct, but it only seems that the majority of the affectionate instinct actually needs to be applied to the spouse (in both directions) to maintain the stability for the children. Another reason divorced parents are awful. Also, I wonder whether this would change the minds of any cuckolds saying they ‘don’t mind’ if a child isn’t theirs, as long as they raise them? This applies to women raising the children of former wives too.

This study found that “cultural transmission” (i.e., from parents) couldn’t explain the pattern seen in children (indeed, the parent-child correlation was negative once you removed heredity). The non-parental environment explained the variance, suggesting that other influences, such as peers, likely explain the results.

Why else do you think mothers care so much about who their child has for friends?
It can predict crime, drug use and all sorts (peer pressure).

This issue squares the matter with Gregory Clark’s results. That is, when you consider other facets, education per se doesn’t seem to mean much in the end. Apparently, you can’t teach moxie. This is revealed by the fact that every trait “going in” that shapes a person (and should be relevant to educational attainment) reliably shows absolutely no shared environment impact.

The Middle Class fallacy. Grit and resilience come into it too (the upper class have it, the middle class despise it).
You could put little Tarquin in the best school to ever exist, it won’t make him a genius.

…including one’s work preferences and interests, the presence or absence of mental disorders, and including the features of a person we think of as “character.” Parents leave no lasting effect on any of it, aside from what they bequeath to their children genetically….

The upper class try to teach their children life skills like grit too.
The middle class assumes it will just happen. Guess who wins.
We’ve all heard comparisons of our character or habits to deceased family members, right?
I would like to see hobbies compared genetically because birth order and sibling rivalry supposedly make children opt into different ones despite genetic similarity.

Who you choose to have children with is the most important decision of your entire life. No pressure. 

Indeed, when we consider the effect of measurement error (adding it to the heritability estimate and to the somewhat nonsensical negative gene-environment correlation values), the heritability of political attitudes and social values skyrockets, being upwards of 85% (74%) for views towards pornography in women (men). The heritability of overall political orientation, when accounting for measurement error, teeters on 100%!

Liberals and conservatives will be battling for a long time to come.

Bodes well for r/K.
I think this is why K-types seem so betrayed when divorced. Total speculation. I’m sure a lot of spouses cheated on would like to stone the 3rd party responsible. Religion is a good excuse to kill the competition.

(Hence the “shared environment” ≠ “all environment.”)

That needs to be made clear for the all  would-be sociologists.

But that’s all OK, yes? The whole point of education is to “shape” the raw individual beyond his/her genetic predilection, right? Wrong.

Education cannot change potential, it can only improve performance up to the ceiling OF potential, how many times do I have to say this?

The problem is that everything that comes out, the adultout comes, shows a shared environment impact that is also zero.

If your parents were screw-ups and couldn’t hold a marriage together, you’ll probably be a screw-up too. It’s the circle of life.

OK, so you might be willing to accept that you can’t shape your child’s personality or values. You can’t control his major life outcomes. You can’t even control how much money he will go on to earn. But surely you can do something useful, like leave your children a lifetime of happiness, right? After all, I believe, and advise, that a parent’s key duty, after ensuring that their children grow up healthy and safe, is to ensure that each has a happy childhood. Surely that must count for something, too,? It does, in the form of fond memories of childhood.

This is so brutal. So redpill.
The lesson is choose your spouse wisely and once you’ve got them, stick with them. You can’t choose your own genetic profile, but you can damn well choose theirs! (This is why women are so selective).

One’s lifetime of happiness boils down to genes and to the fickleness of luck.

yes lestat dancing happy cheery morbid black comedy

I’m one of the lucky people who can be contented in a shed.
It’s like when I was told Follow your Dreams and the money will follow! I was always like ‘but if you are happy, why do you still need the money to justify your decision?’, that art teacher did not like me, not one bit. School really is a prison but that’s news to nobody, frankly. You’re there to do a thing (pass grades) and finally they grant your release. Might as well game the system and learn other, more useful things with their resources while you’re there.

He will be who he will be. It’s only my job to help him get there, and pass on the legacies of all those who came before him. I did all I could do: I married well. Beyond that it’s in the hands of “fate”.

That’s the healthy parental attitude, not the Trophy Child, as I call them, where they need something to brag about like it’s a prize-winning pet or the Dead Dreams Model where the child is pressured to do what the parent wishes they had (a whole career, not little stuff).

The vagaries of the circumstances no doubt imbued good fortune on some and dashed the success of many others.

Whether your society (born into) was just and meritocratic, I’d wager.

But through it all, the thing that is at the root of continuity – DNA – remained the active ingredient to propagate lineages in their respective places through out the ages.
It is as it was said in the Richard Donner Superman films: “The son becomes the father, and father becomes the son.

Superman quotes now? Epic.