Links: Everybody is racist and incitements to genocide

Linkspam incoming. More rabbits than Watership Down.

Everybody is racist, rejoice! The SJWs have nothing to hang over us right? (Although this explains their rhetorical bizarrely-secular Original Sin argument). Social justice is secular holiness.
https://aeon.co/essays/unconscious-racism-is-pervasive-starts-early-and-can-be-deadly
Excellent, we can all stop using the word since it means nothing.

“My friend and I didn’t challenge his ‘facts’, but once he left, we reflected that racism could strike even in the most seemingly liberal of spaces.”

Holding all brown people to no human standard compared with whites and expecting them to act like animals; thieving, raping and murdering, isn’t racist? In light of later evidence in this very article, it’s hilarious to pretend he could challenge the facts.

“The researchers measured increased ACC activity in the brains of those viewing painful expressions on the faces
belonging to their own race, but decreased ACC activity when viewing pain in another race, uncovering a racially biased difference in empathetic response to pain in the brain.”

Biology is racist? Wouldn’t that make it… evolved? Biological paradigm, I know, it hurts the head of liberal arts major, but what was the subtitle of Origin of the Species again?

“These results were disturbing [DS: what a scientist], but were they truly due to race alone? Isn’t race just another group that people tend to rally around?”

Nope, dope. Ask forensic anthropologists. They could tell what race you were hundreds of thousands of years from now, dumbo.

“This study suggests that being on a team of people who share your beliefs doesn’t trump the effect of racial bias, at least as measured in the brain by fMRI.”

All the evidence points one way but they continue to swim the opposite. These people are not scientists. Who follow the evidence.

we bury it deep in the subconscious in layers of denial to protect our social reputation. We might explicitly deny our internal reactions, but implicitly we follow their whispered mandates right down the line.”

Why do they keep using this possession metaphor? With racism as the Devil?
It’s like the witch trials, denial as proof. These people are deranged. Where’s the null hypothesis?
Social suppression is a byproduct of political suppression. People don’t want to ruin their lives over having the wrong
opinion for their time and place, because the so-called liberals don’t really follow Article 8 of the Human Rights Act, that says freedom of opinion is a right. An actual right, not a free stuff goody bag of positive claims.

“At least in this study, black people seem to be more equitable in their evaluation of others’ pain, acting in a more race-neutral manner when unconsciously primed.”

I can explain that. Outsider status. Lower social status. They feel more intensely negative affect. She must know this, but she’s clearly trying to skew it as if black people are superior? Das racism.

“As a black woman…”

Oh here we go. Why am I not surprised she hasn’t seen any of this from a neutral standpoint?

“These stereotypes can be so pervasive that even black people can be affected, showing less empathy for each other that they do for white people.”

correction ohuhno idiots
Logic has gone on vacation because these people are insufferable idiots.

“The effects can be so pervasive they aren’t limited to adults, and not even to the brain.”

THEN IT ISN’T NURTURE. IS IT.
Sociologist’s fallacy from people who aren’t even sociologists. If you can’t measure it, that doesn’t make it environmental. It makes it measurement error.
Already they want to go in with the brainwashing/social engineering because teachers know better than evolution, right? What could possibly go wrong? It isn’t as if Education majors have practically retarded IQs compared to peers.

“it’s important for us when we think about ways to increase empathy”

See the way they try to rally group support, based on a personal opinion? A baseless one at that? Why should you change it? What arrogance to think you must tamper with evolutionary constructs, how can you know better? Empathy is earned from a sincere connection.
It’s almost as if these people don’t feel true empathy, but an intellectual sympathy compared to the self, like a narcissist. That would explain the socialist cheating in studies, they feel entitled to get one over on the group while mouthing platitudes about unity. Behaviour>Stated Beliefs

‘mortality salience’ points to a selection pressure and natural selection aversion in avoiding death for the insane sake of being nice. Who cares what they think of you, if you’re dead? (And your whole tribe, they forget that. Even chimps are racist -to the outgroup tribes- and commit violent genocide with war, good luck pinning this on ‘culture’.)
How many nice apex predators do you see on the planet…? Might as well search for the Dodo. These people are ill-adapted for any culture not as easy as our present one.

The final paragraph slays me.
“All this means that the average police officer has quite a lot to deal with in terms of preventing racially biased
actions.” No. Their job is law enforcement. Nothing else matters. They are not state entities enforcing state mind control. Nobody has that job. Teachers need to teach the objective curriculum and pass tests, not control their pupil’s opinions and home life (that they have a right to, privacy, according to Article 8). Quit overstepping. Jobsworths like this are tyrants in waiting. Communists called them useful idiots, because they always believed that eventually, they’d be trusted with the reins of power if only they kissed up enough.
As you’d expect from someone with such a low IQ (she can’t use basic logic and fallacies elude her notice), her advice is insipid and irrational. She said earlier that making friends with other races has no effect on the brain’s response set and also self-awareness would kill the evil ghost of racism, when the only conscious control was top-down suppression and overcompensation – that isn’t a natural reaction and cannot replace the instinct for self-preservation. Little known fact: instincts always re-surge, and violently, if we believe history. If the West is so terrible to black people, it’s a wonder all the African Americans (really just Africans, Magic Dirt only works on Dracula) haven’t moved back to their homeland… Ironically, in making out White People to be the problem, even in places they don’t exist or live, they are engaged in their own form of scientific racism, purporting that whites are somehow inferior (culturally, socially, morally).

https://aeon.co/opinions/does-one-ethnic-group-own-its-cultural-artefacts
Yes.
Obviously. They made it, they own it. Cultural appropriation is one of those rare things SJWs got completely correct. Make your own, cultural welfare (symbolic theft) is wrong.
While it is technically cultural apartheid, there is flagrant disrespect in taking and using symbols and objects and
ideas (non-scientific) that are not one’s own, especially without careful handling and when such things are mocked or perverted (an insult in need of reply).

“Instead of decolonising museums, the new practices echo and reinforce a racial discourse. [DS: whose fault is that?] They present an idea of culture as fixed and immutable – something people own by virtue of biological ancestry. This racial view of the world should trouble us.”

That’s literally the only reason we have a diversity of cultures TO display. These people are never happy.

“It also follows, according to the logic of identity museum practice, that those outside the culture cannot truly understand it because they’ve never experienced it. It’s an approach that creates barriers between people. And also between people and artefacts. It advances the idea that cultures are separate and irreconcilable.”

A special kind of stupid.

“But handing over the right to narrate history to those with the approved ethnicity is not the way that knowledge works.”

Cultural symbols, subjective, not knowledge. They belong to those who created them and imbued them with meaning, like a sigil.

“There must be universal access. [DS; citation? reason?] That is how questions can be explored, and old forms of authority challenged.”

SJW Entryism at its finest. Let them in. Let them destroy you from the inside. We tried to warn you. Cultural Marxism doesn’t care. It is a prion disease – self-perpetuating to destruction by way of madness.

“It creates an idealised version of the past – one that never accounts for itself, because it cannot be questioned.”

They want to rewrite the past, trust these people…

“all kinds of information about past indigenous people, particularly religion, is now deemed ‘culturally sensitive’ and unsuitable for public discussion in these museums”

– because they’ll be disgraced as ‘racist’ and have funding withdrawn for going into the gory details of savagery and
depravity of raping babies to cure disease and eating them because they’re too dumb to grow crops and live in the desert knowing crops can’t grow but expecting them to, magically. Hell, Brit Druids used to sacrifice people for a good harvest, everyone has skeletons. Who wants to hear their ancestor was a monster?

Yet more genocide. Ask: Do these people really have the child’s best interests at heart? Knowing the Romanian Orphanage Studies, etc? Knowing the psychiatric problems caused by separation and proven conclusively? Rabbits thrive when their competition suffers, remember that. 
https://aeon.co/opinions/if-babies-were-randomly-allocated-to-families-would-racism-end
Article 2(e)

“Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”
As covered here: http://wp.me/p10lxG-1nI
Incitement to this (and other) genocide is a crime, per se. Round ’em up, boys. Round. ‘Em. Up.

  • “Third, the superficial connection between colour and culture would be severed. Racism would be wiped out. Racial ghettos would disappear; children of all races would live in all neighbourhoods.”

The delusion is strong. ….Based on WHAT? Sky fairies? Wood nymphs? WHAT.

“genetic chauvinism”

This term again.

omg why no facepalm god ugh wut

I feel it will be popping up a lot as HBD findings hit the MSM. The truth is bigoted, you know. Science is the tool of the Patriarchy because it exposes professional liars. Like, say, how distant twins have similar life outcomes and parenting has hardly any positive effect on the child (although there can be harm, obviously)? How identical twins raised by different parents (adopted by strangers) embody the phrase: blood will out, because genetics triumphs over local pressures? The Cinderella Effect, no? Nothing? No admission or twinge of guilt?
quillette.com/2015/12/23/how-to-find-a-parenting-effect-2/
quillette.com/2015/12/01/why-parenting-may-not-matter-and-why-most-social-science-research-is-probably-wrong/
nb. Hence my coverage on the human rights violation and a slavery of our time: politely referred to as ‘forced adoption’. There are plenty of cases of care homes (child, special, elderly) abusing their charges coming out and more to come, I’m sure.

Btw, anyone interested by these topics:
https://www.coursera.org/course/behavioralgenetics

I’ve heard good things about that course, it isn’t all saccharine ego stroking.

Onto a global topic.

Saving the world doesn’t work.
https://aeon.co/opinions/why-humanitarian-intervention-goes-horribly-wrong
For those considering the genocide in MENA among others.

“Nearly 200 states signed on. Many scholars, activists and NGOs are guided by the ‘responsibility to protect’ doctrine. They point to the 2005 UN endorsement as evidence that it has become a norm that is global and enforceable.
Unfortunately, these lofty claims have no basis in reality. To begin with, R2P cannot be enforced.”

nb. Agenda 21 amusingly refers to native populations and the duty to protect them, pity it isn’t applied equally.

Postmodern law. Where genocide is good? You can’t outrun a gun.
https://aeon.co/opinions/here-comes-pseudolaw-a-weird-little-cousin-of-pseudoscience

It’s a con, like those Get Rich By Blogging people. It’s a diary. They’re adult men who keep an online diary.

Inattention and immorality
https://aeon.co/essays/busy-and-distracted-everybody-has-been-since-at-least-1710
It’s about respect for elders and traditions, except present elder are Boomers, who have no traditions to pass on. That might be the problem.
‘an epidemic erosion of attention is a sure sign of an impending dark age’

The teachers don’t want to do their job and instill values like concentration (parents neither, but teachers are supposed to be trained and get paid for this).

Born gay is stupid and dangerous, especially if you’re gay

http://aeon.co/magazine/society/why-born-gay-is-a-dangerous-idea/

It’s been obvious to me since the beginning. Never rest your laurels on a single hypothesis – nor legal matters either.
Think of it this way – would you bet all your Finals on your answer to a random, ultra-hard question?

secretly amused laughing lol rdj saints yeah fuck you

For societal deviance and destruction of the Old Order, would you bet your life on a piece of speculation?

joker DC smile smirk evil grin lol haha

Exactly, it’s suicidally stupid.

There is a funny HBD parallel to this in race, their “rationales” oppose one another;

Yet one stark difference between these civil rights movements has escaped notice.

African-American activists aggressively called out {?} arguments about genetic and biological differences as legacies of racist, Nazi science. By contrast, the marriage-equality movement has embraced biological determinism. Gay and lesbian activists have led the way popularising the idea that identity is biologically determined.

Now, if their side is totally and completely wrong about one thing e.g. Gay Germ Theory withstands, what are the odds they’re wrong about their other ‘sciences’? It amuses me, is all.
I mean;

 The battle for gay marriage has been won, and other, even more challenging battles lie before the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) movement. To succeed in them, activists and scholars must abandon the fundamental fiction they have propagated.

Can you blame me?

david tennant 10 lol laughing cracking up

When politics and science mix, it’s hilarious.
They cannot win.
Even if there were biological predispositions, they’d be aborted out of the human genome. Either way – they’re fucked.

Nazi science was committed to uncovering the genetic differences associated with perversion, be that Jewishness, homosexuality, the Romani, people of colour, the mentally ill, or others deemed ‘born that way’.

All science looks to cause. ALL science. Like, that’s why we’re here.
We see a thing and we go – why did that happen? – about a billion times.

sherlock bbc cracking up lol laughing so hard

When we find differences between the forensic races, it’s called scientific racism by idiots. Nah, it’s forensics bruh.
Like, what will it be when we eventually find causative factors for gayness, whatever they may be? Scientific homophobia? That’s it – I’m using that phrase the next time some libtard says Born this Way.
These ridiculous SJW restraints on science won’t allow jack to get done. We’ll sit round twiddling our thumbs because drawing conclusions about people is bigoted stereotypy. Found a cure for cancer? Nah man, we don’t care, that’s albeist!

What is deeply ironic is that nowadays you could get the Jews to walk around with a Star of David on their clothing by choice if you made out it was the fashionable thing to do.

But both share the presupposition of biological determinism: that genetics determine identity; such genes must result in either elimination or embrace. This suggests why the activist alliance with genetic determinism yielded such successful results. [people respect science over rhetoric?]

Sweet while you’re in power (like now and Cathedral support for the useful idiots) or the explanations are nice and fluffy (e.g. pure genetics). What if they’re disgusting (i.e. pathogenic)? What happens when the Opposition take over, eventually? You only need to genocide a tribe ONCE. It’s like terrorism in that regard.

TLDR: LGBT, W/E+?

you're fucked lol tilda constantine gabriel

Afrocentrism, magic powers and “people of color”

Wonder where the term POC comes from?

A niche conspiracy theory from Afrocentrism.

TLDR: Black people naturally have magical powers because of their skin colour, they are the (semi-divine? superior) “People of Color” (POC is a dogwhistle) and the White Man hates them and hunts them and ruins their life etc… because he wishes to suppress their magic powers. POCs should destroy the White Man and white people and finally claim their magical abilities no I am not joking and this is taught in schools to black kids.

http://www.csicop.org/si/show/magic_melanin_spreading_scientific_illiteracy_among_minorities/

The alleged properties of melanin, mostly unsupported, irrelevant, or distortions of the scientific literature, are then used to justify Afrocentric assertions. One of the most common is that humans evolved as blacks in Africa, and that whites are mutants (albinos, or melanin recessives) (Welsing 1989; King 1991).

whites probably are mutants, but from Neanderthals
mutation is good though, evolutionally speaking, we’re evolved

…The high rates of murder, of imprisonment, and of drug use, as well as the high rates of unemployment among black males, are cited as evidence for the conspiracy. ….

sherlock bbc cracking up lol laughing so hard

Agency? Anyone???
Yeah we mind-control their superior brains into killing one another, ignore the MAO genetics.

…From this he develops an “equation”: CNS + EMS = HB (human being) – that is, whites are not fully human. Others, such as Richard King (1991), express the same idea by their repeated use of the term hueman instead of “human,” with the connotation that only people with color are truly human. The idea that people to be discriminated against are not fully human has always been used by racists as a justification for their actions. It is sad to see it being used by people who have suffered so much from racism themselves.

…The consequences of a wide acceptance of this notion by AfricanAmerican schoolchildren could be quite damaging. Children could reject appeals from teachers to study hard for years in order to be prepared to become scientists. Black children could respond that in order to be a scientist all they need do is “Let my melanin pick up the vibes.”…

This justifies tribal voodoo doesn’t it. Remote viewing is probably BS, unlike psionic study which can be objective with computer testing. It’s one step away from spirit guides.

She alleges that Greek oracles were black and that their melanin enabled them, as it does present-day blacks, to foresee the future.

The group with the lowest time preference? Are you kidding me?
The Greek oracles were beauties from noble families, they were pale like ghosts from being indoors all the time, it was part of their thing: “All agree, however, that young girls were selected and carefully trained so that they could transmit the high inspiration of the god without in any way marring its purity and meaning. Later it was found prudent to use married women — who were required to live apart from their husbands before and during their oracular duties. In fact, even those who consulted the Pythia were expected to practice chastity, and also to undergo purification, offer sacrifice, approach the holy precincts with reverence and trust and, when waiting in the vestibule, to remain silent, thinking pure thoughts.” ~ source Yes, that sounds like a black girl – timid, virginal and obedient. Oracles were pagan, European pagans. Fuck these people appropriating European culture.

These people just make it up as they go along. Anything good, they claim they did it. Was Einstein black too?
Afrocentrists are like the neo-Nazis who are pathetic enough to think doing nothing with their lives but complain about their skin still makes them superior – nope, you still have to try. You have to accomplish on an individual level. Afrocentrists can’t admit that until Whitey came along and built taps, sewerage systems and gave them medicine less likely to poison them, they were living like savages and a few places still do. They weren’t building compound microscopes and eyeglasses like Europe. There is photographic Victorian evidence if you go and look, various books from the time document it. A lack of intellectual curiosity doesn’t make a person evil, we can’t blame them for being backward by comparison, but it isn’t something to encourage, nor to steal the accomplishments of others, betters, for your own self-aggrandizement (including people within your race you are not related to, e.g. I like Goethe, I am not German; I like Shakespeare, I can claim him as kin, extended family).

As the theoreticians behind the Portland Baseline Essays, they can increase scientific illiteracy among those poor urban children who are most in need of better science teaching. These children do not need pseudoscience traveling under the guise of multiculturalism.

If they’re dumb enough to believe it in the age of the internet in their palm, they were never going to be a scientist.

[Ancient Egyptians weren’t black, the royal family was actually ghostly pale, and the pyramids weren’t built by slaves but paid employees, partially paid in alcohol.]

n.b. Psi can mean anything an author wants it to. It’s kinda like The Force in that sense. Psi can be studied scientifically, with Random Number Generators and various objective equipment, but it’s very rarely applied to the same scientific standards it should be. Extraordinary claims do NOT require extraordinary proof – all claims should be held to the same normal, objective standards, without raising the goalposts for hypotheses inconvenient for the Scientific Establishment. Everyone should play by the same rules and require the same burden of proof – that is science and its process. A skeptic doesn’t ignore a subject because it is unpopular, those are scientism devotees.